Thursday, November 10, 2011

And I myself, in Rome, heard it said openly in the streets, “If there is a hell, then Rome is built on it.” That is, “After the devil himself, there is no worse folk than the pope and his followers.” Against the Roman Papacy, An Institution of the Devil ( Wider das Papstum zu Rom vom Teuffel Gestifft, A. D. 1545)[8] (Wiki link, Martin_Luther)

Pancake Pope, protecting the faithful against
Shrove Tuesday pancakes.
But incest is an adiaphoron.


And I myself, in Rome, heard it said openly in the streets, “If there is a hell, then Rome is built on it.” That is, “After the devil himself, there is no worse folk than the pope and his followers.” Against the Roman Papacy, An Institution of the Devil ( Wider das Papstum zu Rom vom Teuffel Gestifft, A. D. 1545)[8] (Wiki link, Martin_Luther):

"But Bernhard Müller, editor of the Catholic magazine PUR, dismissed the clerics' reaction as grossly hypocritical. He alleged that the pornography scandal at Weltbild had been going on for at least a decade with the Church's full knowledge. Mr Müller said that in 2008, a group of concerned Catholics had sent bishops a 70-page document containing irrefutable evidence that Weltbild published books that promoted pornography, Satanism and magic. They demanded that the publisher withdraw the titles.

1 comments:

Brett Meyer said...

Speaking of promoting pornography...The (W)ELS still defends the homoerotic Martin Luther College video, Party in the MLC, which was not a parody of Ms. Cyrus' song video but of the video created and published by the homosexuals who attend Fire Island Pines. This video didn't mock the homoerotic behavior of the FIP video but enhanced it. If anything, the video simply added to the homosexual desensitization of thousands of boys and girls.

por·nog·ra·phy   /pɔrˈnɒgrəfi/ Spelled[pawr-nog-ruh-fee] IPAnoun - obscene writings, drawings, photographs, or the like, especially those having little or no artistic merit.

By this definition (W)ELS also promotes and publishes pornography and actively defends it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kSdADOIG3Y
To show that this wasn't received as a mocking sodomy here are comments from the homosexuals regarding the (W)ELS MLC Party in the MLC video:
No. 11 · hephaestion
I don’t see the straight college kids as making fun of the gay video. I thought their video was very cute, and I think they just used the Fire Island video as an excuse to liberate themselves to act silly just as the Fire Island guys were being silly in their video. If the college boys had meant for their video to be anti-gay they would have made it anti-gay with really hideous flaming and an ugly tone to the video. What I see is a fun tone… more like “We like being silly, too.” Not “We hate you and want to dehumanize you.” I really don’t think these are anti-gay kids at ALL. Maybe someone should ask them. Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 11:25 am · @Reply ·

No. 13 · hardmannyc · Member · 1071 comments
Yeah, they’re making fun of the Pines boys, but affectionately. And I think some of them are cute! Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 6:32 pm · @Reply ·

No. 14 · Guest
Martin Luther College…not Midland. And these boys are certainly just having fun, no “anti-gay” sentiments here. It was a skit for homecoming. Just a bunch of kids trying to remake a YouTube classic who never thought it would get that many views. Posted: Oct 23, 2009 at 10:39 am · @Reply ·

No. 15 · Alex Taylor
Instead of worring about this video expressing “anti-gay” sentiments(which I personally don’t think it does), lets have some fun with this and get a friendly debate going…which guy is your favorite? cutest? ugliest? are they straight but still adorable? anyone want to give a critique? Posted: Oct 23, 2009 at 5:34 pm