 |
| Fox Valley Jimmy |
Fox Valley Jimmy said... Jackson writes on his blog:
"This is a bit too obvious to mention - these sob-sisters have always posted anonymously, yet they attack people by name."
Huh?
So, it's cool to attack people anonymously on your blog (i.e, half the people who comment on your posts), but elsewhere it's immoral? Just like it's bad for people to get non-synodical degrees, except when you get one? Or how it's bad to slander people, except when half the stuff on your blog is a lie. Ok, I get it.
I look forward to the self-righteous and hypocritical response over at the Ichabode!
***
GJ - I look forward to the page-read figures when the foxes and vixens of Appleton are busy writing.
Strangers to the WELS cult need to realize that the clergy think they have a right to engage in ad hominem attacks whenever their false doctrine is questioned. The readers who post on this blog like to address the issues of false doctrine, the purpose for this little Internet effort.
No one reads Ichabod, Appletonians agree. There were 2,000 page-reads today. I write all my own comments, they claim - which I means I took time to write 15,000 comments in the last few years, many of them coming (as if by magic) from Garland, Texas (hometown, Don Patterson, a co-inky-dink) and Appleton (the rotten CORE of WELS).
