Monday, May 9, 2011

LCMS Chaplains To Perform Gay Marriages?
That Would Never Happen in WELS



bruce-church (http://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Time To Escape From The Synod of the Apes.Why Pay...":

The LCMS has always been heavily involved in the US military chaplaincy program--at least since WWII. Now, however, with the military's "Don't Ask, Please Tell" policy of allowing gays, chaplains are being asked to officiate at same-sex marriages:

"HOMOSEXUAL SENSITIVITY TRAINING" AND GAY MARRIAGE IN THE MILITARY

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/05/homosexual-sensitivyt-training-and-gay-marriage-in-the-military-.html

Rhonda Martinez on the Condition of WELS



Anonymous said...
Personally I don't see how there can even BE a WELS Synod convention this summer if there is not complete doctrinal unity amongst the members - both laity and pastors. There must be a common starting point. The synod seems to be in complete disarray. Just the fact that we ~ who have been long awaiting some kind of indication to show which side of the fence the WELS leadership would fall on ~ are STILL waiting... speaks volumes. Wait no longer, their silence tells the story loud and clear. It should be the FIRST thing that's discussed at the synod convention to show the church body as a whole where we stand. That should be followed by a proclamation of what we believe and then go from there. It then becomes decision time for every one of us. Do you stay or do you go? Will you be part of the solution or part of the problem? Sadly, there are many members who do not even know the first thing about these matters or choose NOT to know about them. The way it stands now, we are not even in fellowship with many of our own synod members. How does one get past that to carry on a convention? What other matter could top this one in importance and priority? I, for one, will be watching and making decisions of my own afterwards. I have personally written President Schroeder over the past couple years with concerns and encouragement. It's been my prayer, and still is, that under his leadership and with the help of God, our synod resolves its issues and we are able to read, learn, and inwardly digest God's Word- our Great Heritage, keep its teachings pure, and continue to spread them from age to age. Others before us did that for us. It's now OUR responsibility to do it for others and throughout all generations. There needs to be a quick resolution of all these problems so we can get back to the real work of the church. Rhonda Martinez



Oh, the cost of dicipleship!

Appleton Proves That Speaking to an Errant Pastor, Writing Letters to the SP, Meeting with Pastors, Keeping the DP's Secrecy, etc - All Are a Waste of Time




No, I don't see a problem in Appleton. Nope.



The Silence Is Broken: An Appleton Update

“This issue, and now the silence following it, has deeply shook my confidence in our synod.”
Dan Johnson (5/3/11)


The WELS Conference of Presidents (COP) reports in the recently released Book of Reports and Memorials for this summer’s synod convention:

“One continuing area of discussion is the matter of congregational practices in the areas of worship, outreach, and organization. While fully committed to the scriptural principle of Christian freedom, the COP continues to encourage congregations to determine carefully those things that lie within the realm of Christian freedom and then to exercise Christian freedom with wisdom, brotherly love, and extensive consultation with others in our fellowship who may be affected. The COP maintains, as it has in the past, that our practice in all of these areas should be consistent with our doctrine and should reflect a unified understanding of scriptural principles. It continues to encourage open and brotherly discussion of these matters at circuit, conference, and district meetings, convinced that such discussions, done in a spirit of Christian love and based on an ongoing study of God’s Word, are essential to maintaining our unity, our understanding of Christian freedom, and our clear identity as a confessional Lutheran church body.” (Emphasis added)

The concerns raised by a group of five WELS pastors and two laymen in Wisconsin’s Fox Valley have everything to do with “congregational practices in the areas of worship, outreach, and organization.” They center on the “exercise (of) Christian freedom with wisdom (and) brotherly love.” There’s a desire for “extensive consultation with others in our fellowship who may be affected.” And the concern is absolutely about how “our practice in all these areas should be consistent with our doctrine and should reflect a unified understanding of scriptural principles.”

The highlighted portion of the paragraph above relates why there has been silence since the March 25 meeting. We were told not to write in a blog about anything that was discussed. I’m not saying that I agree with this, but I’ve done my best to respect the request.

I will say this: the concerns we had were answered by the district presidium in a written response. There was a time for discussion, but it did little to bring the two sides closer to a real agreement on the issues before us. Nevertheless, there is a desire to keep talking.

As for Rick Techlin, please stay in touch with his situation by visiting his blog, "Light from Light." I’ve agreed to allow him to speak for himself.

I’m sorry, Dan, that your faith in our synod’s resolve to teach pure doctrine is shaken. As a whole, I believe the WELS is still committed to that. When practices that threaten to upset our unity of doctrine are paraded in front of the public on the internet, a public response may very well be called for, even if it’s not our first choice.

The Intrepid Lutherans’ hope has always been for an open, honest discussion on the matters of doctrine and practice that threaten to divide our synod. We still hope for that, instead of silence.

Pastor Paul Lidtke

16 comments:

Anonymous said...
I can't speak for Dan Johnson, I can only speak for myself. If my confidence in the resolve of WELS leaders to deal with false doctrine wasn't shaken before, it certainly is after reading this. Public sin demands and requires public rebuke. By dealing with this matter silently and enforcing silence on all involved, the leaders of the synod have tacitly expressed their approval of the things going on in Appleton. This is inexcusable. Who cares if the COP puts a paragraph in the BORAM about how nice it is to talk to each other? Talk is cheap. I get the impression that the leaders of the synod are more concerned with preserving external unity at the expense of true Scriptural unity. To paraphrase Ben Franklin: those who would sacrifice true Scriptural unity for the sake of false outward unity deserve neither. Mr. Adam Peeler
Tim Niedfeldt said...
Another tough issue settled with an ambiguous letter that stresses silence, patience, and a promise to talk more. If they were any more effective they could be congressmen. I agree with Adam. I just sit dumbfounded as to why the ministry community can't handle dealing with issues in public, with authority and speed. But at least this BORAM addition is a nice public wuss out. Hmm. Lack of transparency, all talk no action, watered down compromise that ultimately leads to a unity no one is happy with. Where have I heard this tired story before? Tim Niedfeldt
Daniel Baker said...
Perhaps if the synod bureaucracy considered itself to be the leadership of Christ's Church, rather than the administration of some money-obsessed business, we wouldn't be seeing example after example of politicking at its finest. Suffice it to say, I remain unsurprised by this turn of events. Negotiations are not going to win this war (and that is what this is); an aggressive frontal assault is called for. Perhaps we 'die' trying, but there are worse things than leaving the synod.
Anonymous said...
I'm admittedly not fully aware of all that is going on in Appleton. But I've followed the story here and on other blogs. But what, specifically, would you nail Pastor Skorewski to the wall for? (I assume that is whom is meant by Appleton?) I've read about the plagiarism charge. It is disconcerting that a pastor would preach a sermon that is not his own without referencing that it is his own. But I don't think that this is the heart of the concern. Is he non-sacramental? Well, I know they celebrate the Lord's Supper and practice baptism. They might not do it with the reverence or frequency I would like, but I'm not sure I could call that sin. Is it that Pastor Skorewski is non-liturgical? I would call that unwise, but saying that a failure to use the Western Rite makes you a sinner... well... I can't imagine any Lutheran saying that. A Pharisee, yes. A Lutheran, no. Bottom line - I'd appreciate it someone would delineate a specific point of doctrine which Pastor Skorewski has violated, and which, if confronted, would not recant. It seems to me that what the guy is most guilty of is failing to consult with and address the concerns of the other Appleton pastors in the area, as well as other WELS members at large. If that is the case, then the action of the district presidents seems fairly spot on - encouraging more theological study and discussion. To do more, to discipline Pastor Skorewski or remove him from ministry, would require someone to be able to name some specific doctrine that he has violated, and refuse to repent. I have not seen that done yet. It's all been fairly vague, it seems. If his specific offenses have been spelled out here, if someone could please link me to that post, I'd appreciate it. Yours in Christ, Daniel Kastens
Scott E. Jungen said...
Daniel, A good place to start might be the open letter written by Intrepids to Pastor Ski. Scott E. Jungen
Intrepid Lutherans said...
To AP, Tim, and Daniel Baker - What everyone simply must understand is the 800 pound gorilla in the room, which is complete, all-out, civil war in the WELS. If discipline were to be carried out as swiftly and as firmly as many of us believe it should, there would be open rebellion from a large portion of WELS Pastors, congregations, and district leaders; perhaps one-third or more would leave or withhold their support. So, let's all understand what is at stake here. In my opinion, what our more confessional leaders, such as Pres. Schroeder, are trying to do is bring that one third around to a correct understanding and practice of confessional Lutheranism without alienating them or bringing about open warfare. This in itself is a laudable enough goal. However, it remains to be seen whether or not it is already too late to accomplish this. Many believe - I am one - that discipline should be carried out as needed and when needed, and that we must then simply put our faith and trust in the Lord of the Church. If He wants the WELS to continue to exist He is quite capable of making that happen. All of us need to encourage our leaders to do what needs to be done and let Jesus take care of the results. Let us hold up their weary arms in this long battle! To Daniel Kastens - By his actions, more so than his words, Pastor Ski has demonstrated a very clear lack of trust in the Means of Grace, and indeed a denigration of these Means, not to mention making a mockery of the Pastoral office. That makes him a sectarian and not a confessional Lutheran. While I believe he is a Christian, his ministry is not a confessional Lutheran one, and therefore, if he is honest he should not remain in the WELS, and if WELS were honest he would not be allowed to remain in the synod, unless and until his actions matched the promises he made at his Lutheran ordination. Thank you all for your comments. Pastor Spencer
Scott E. Jungen said...
Pastor Spencer, I taught in Lutheran elementary schools for twenty-four years. One of the best ways to lose the respect of the well-behaved, hard-working students in your class is to not, or be perceived to not, discipline the "naughty" ones. Trust me, I know from first-hand experience. We have many "naughty" pastors and teachers in the WELS. (The above mentioned Pastor Ski being one of them.) I and several of the gentlemen above are saying they have lost confidence in the "teacher" because the "naught" ones still get away with the same old stuff. I believe that open civil war in the WELS might not be the worst thing to happen. One of the problems I perceive in the WELS is the number of closed door, don't talk about it, I'll handle it personally meetings. I civil war would cause pastors, teachers, congregations, Districts to stand-up for, and fight for, what they believe. I know the dust would be knocked of those Books of Concord, Scriptures would be studied, the Smalcald Articles read, etc. As painful as civil war might be, can we say that greater study of Scripture and the Confessions is a bad thing? Didn't the Lord of the Church cause His Church to thrive in time of trouble? As laudable as President Schroeder's goal of instruction might be, I believe that time is past. Stand up, state what you believe and confess, and let the "chips' fall where they may. Didn't a monk named Luther do that five hundred years ago? Scott E. Jungen
Lund Family said...
I am a delegate to the WELS convention this summer. I am uncertain that any of this will come up as formal discussion. I do know a few other memorials are on the voting block so to speak. The makeup of delegates is one such memorial. As Pastor Spencer and Rydecki and other suggest, I continue to voice my concerns to local and circuit pastors. They sometime in turn voice concerns to the Minnesota DP. I have written a letter to Pastor Jeske with concerns previously. I certainly hope others write letters in their districts. Whether it happens quickly or slowly, we must continue to be vigilant and faithful in pointing out the problems of doctrine and practice. We certainly would not want to wakeup some day to anything resembling Seminex. My biggest concern is the lack of public communication, even with the Internet today. If its a public offense, we need to have public responses, lest the parties causing offense are seen by WELS as edifying and orderly in their poor practices.
Intrepid Lutherans said...
Scott & The Lunds, I taught in a Middle School in El Paso, TX for five years, and wholeheartedly agree with you. What's true of 1st graders, is doubly true of Middle-schoolers! The best way to loose control of a classroom is to let the trouble-makers get away with disrupting the class! So, I for one agree that we should carry out discipline swift and sure and let the war happen if it happens. My other point is that ALL of us need to let our leaders know WE will support them if and when they do their job. Maybe instead, or at least in addition to, of being "ankle-biters," and criticizing them for not acting as fast as we would like, we need to constantly encourage and support them and tell them we are behind them 1000%. This might do as much if not more than kicking at them to act. Yes, they sometimes need to be criticized, I agree with that. But, more than anything else, I believe they need to know that many are very strongly behind them and will back them up when and if they have to take action. Call it "positive reinforcement." Thanks for your comments and your efforts! Pastor Spencer
Joseph Jewell said...
"The highlighted portion of the paragraph above relates why there has been silence since the March 25 meeting. We were told not to write in a blog about anything that was discussed. I’m not saying that I agree with this, but I’ve done my best to respect the request." That makes no sense at all vis-a-vis the highlighted text. How are "open discussions" especially "essential" open discussions done with "ongoing study" at all compatible with a gag order? It grieves my heart that my synod operates like this.
Mr. Douglas Lindee said...
Mr. Lund, You state matters quite well. And, I'll add, as I've read your commentary over the past, what, couple years or so on this blog and on others, I have been impressed with how careful and well-balanced you've been as you address the concerns of others and express your own. You'll make a fine delegate. I will not be at Synod Convention as a delegate this year. It was my congregation's turn to send a delegate to the last convention – though I volunteered, I was passed over for that privilege. Rev. Lidtke has official duties at Convention this year, however, as a member of one of the committees, but none of the rest of us have an official reason to be there, nor do we have an invitation to be there. We had discussed among ourselves the possibility of having a booth for Intrepid Lutherans at Convention, but have not made a final decision on that. If we do something of that sort, I, and possibly Mr. Heyer, would attend for the sake of attending the booth and engaging in discussion with folks, but obviously we would have no part in the Convention itself. Personally, I am quite positive that no provision for formal discussion over these and similar troublesome issues will be made part of this years' agenda. Nevertheless, I would encourage you and others to make them a part of informal discussion, not only at Convention, but among the lay delegates prior to and leading up to it. When your district delegates meet, bring them up personally with your fellow lay delegates. Point them to our blog articles, or print some out and bring them with you. The fact is, the pressing issues of unity in doctrine and practice underlie all matters of practice that can or will be discussed at Convention. Therefore, while not formal items on the agenda, they will, nevertheless, indirectly be aspects of each item. Informal discussion of them is implicit in the agenda, and reference to them ought to be made from the floor when appropriate. For example, rather than assuming that the Convention is being presented with orthodox and confessional recommendations, all agenda items ought to be critically assessed by the delegates from the perspective of consistency with our body of doctrine and unity of practice across our fellowship; committee chairmen ought to be interrogated from the floor regarding the practices they recommend to Synod; essayists ought to be scrutinized, and if found wanting, suggestion that their work be returned by the Synod in Convention, rather than "received with thanks," will need to be made by the delegates. Continued in next post...
Mr. Douglas Lindee said...
...Continued from previous post. At this point, after having been at this with Intrepid Lutherans for almost a year now, and in the process having seen from the inside some of the political pressures that are applied to the clergy, I am convinced that, regardless of how critical these issues may be, there will be no "broad uprising" from among them. If the issues were viewed as that important, it would be far simpler for a pastor to lead his congregation out of Synod than to try to change it – but where would he go? He’d have to grin and bear no matter where he went, so why not just stay put and keep quiet? I’ve heard a few confessional pastors among us speak to me this way in the past year. The fact is, although many support IL privately, we have been informed by several young and mid-career pastors that they cannot do so publicly due to very real external pressures that are exerted on them. And among the more experienced clergy – especially the old war-dogs like Rev. Spencer who have been fighting these battles for decades – they simply won't bother with it anymore – but not because they’re tired, and not because they don’t care, but because they've given up any hope that meaningful positive change can occur and will no longer exert themselves toward this end. If positive change is going to occur, then, in my honest opinion, meaningful leadership will need to emerge from among the laity. The laity alone, in the end, however, will be insufficient – but perhaps their leadership will roust otherwise complacent, fearful or burdened clergy to action. "Perhaps" – that's as positive as I can be, humanly speaking. Seriously. But what sort of leadership shall the laity supply? Certainly, speaking out on the floor of Convention, or in committees, is one way. Another may be openly communicating in venues like IL. A third may be openly addressing issues as they are observed in one's own congregation. Just as importantly, I think, is letter writing to Synod leadership and encouraging fellow laymen to do the same. It seems ridiculous that in an “apolitical” institution, such our Synod, “lobbying” for one’s position en masse seems to garner the most attention and respect from leadership – and the greater the numbers, the greater the attention and respect, while the fewer the numbers, the greater the risk, even to one's continuation in fellowship. In principle, this should not necessarily be the case, but observation over time has shown this to be true. Ultimately, we know that the Lord of the Church is in control. Mr. Douglas Lindee
Scott E. Jungen said...
Mr. Lindee, One of the few positive aspects of leaving the teaching ministry is the fact that I am more free to speak my mind. (For better or worse!) I would not have written what I wrote above two years ago. I'm not sure my former pastor and congregation would have minded. I know they feel the same ways on many issues. My current pastor reads this blog. However, there is an unspoken reluctance to "rock the boat." Scott E. Jungen
Anonymous said...
Dear Scott and Pastor Spencer, I just re-read that open letter. I didn't comment on it at the time, because I figured I didn't understand the whole situation. I am certain I still don't. The first objection is that Pastors Jeske and Skorewski shouldn't participate in the conference because the premise is faulty - Change or Die. I certainly appreciate that God's Church will never disappear. But can the same be said of individual congregations. For example, if an orthodox Lutheran church continued to preach in German, in spite of the fact fewer and fewer members spoke German, would not that church eventually "die"? I would be willing to bet both Pastor Jeske and Pastor Skorewski would say they believe the Means of Grace are the only thing that can save souls. I think, as that letter indicates, they are focusing on methodology, German vs. English, contemporary music vs. historic music, etc. I think the terminology is probably bad, a bit sky-is-falling. I'd rather the theme be stated positively, something like, "Being good stewards of the Means of Grace," or "Using All Our Gifts to Share the Gospel." But, bottom line, I don't know you can say for certain that the premise is wrong. The second objection of that letter is more of a concern -- the appearance of unity. But, does simply participating in a conference together signify unity? Did Pastor Jeske and Skorewski worship or pray with these other pastors? If so, that's clearly wrong. But what if they actually gave testimony to the false doctrine of other Lutheran church bodies by their non-participation in such activities? Might they have done that? I still would have concerns. The way the event was promoted, it can give the appearance of unity. But might not that danger always be there with any type of free conference? I'm certain there are some who feel with this recent Emmaus conference, WELS and the LCMS might be moving very close to re-establishing fellowship. That would be a false assumption, but it is one that I could see one making. Yet, a judgment call was made that the potential misunderstanding does not outweigh the potential good that was accomplished by clarifying positions on the basis of the Word and Confessions. I assume that's what Pastor Jeske and Skorewski did too - weighed the potential good vs. the potential harm. I would disagree with their conclusion, but I wouldn't say they have sinned, but simply acted unwisely. Pastor Spencer, your comment - "more by his actions than his words" - is sort of an example of what I mean when I say things seem to be stately vaguely. If the Judge were holding court, and you were the prosecuting attorney, what passage of Scripture would you say Pastor Skorewski has violated, that he would not readily recant if confronted with his error? Daniel K.
Anonymous said...
Rick Techlin made three accusations of false doctrine, pointed largely at Pastor Glende at St. Peter, Freedom, in his January 20, 2011 letter (see pages 14-26). The Intrepids (which includes pastors) said that they stand behind Mr. Techlin one hundred percent. That leaves three possibilities: 1. Mr. Techlin is right and Pastor Glende is promoting false doctrine 2. Mr. Techlin is wrong and the Intrepid pastors are promoting false doctrine 3. This is all just a big misunderstanding. The following sentence in the original post above seems to eliminate #3 as a possibility: "There was a time for discussion, but it did little to bring the two sides closer to a real agreement on the issues before us." That leaves possibilities #1 and #2. In a synod that says we keep its doctrine pure, there cannot be public accusations of false doctrine flying around without public rebuke or remorse about them. The silence addressing the false doctrine continues... Dan Johnson
Rev. Paul A. Rydecki said...
First, the "Appleton update" is not to be understood as a big target with Pastor Ski as the bullseye. The issues being discussed are bigger than Ski. Our treatment of the ongoing situation there is centered around the concerns of a confessional Lutheran WELS layman, and the inexplicable refusal of some pastors and leaders in that district to treat him with respect and answer his concerns in accordance with the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions. Daniel, if you're looking for a point by point explanation of what the issues in question are, then I'll encourage you to read Rick Techlin's two letters (available on his Light from Light blog) outlining the specific issues he and the area pastors are trying to address. Daniel, you played the "Pharisee card" above, and I'm going to have to call you on it. You say "failure to use the Western Rite" would never be labeled as sinful by any Lutheran. Granted. It's not the "non-use" of the Western Rite that's the problem. It's what IS used that's the problem. If not the Western Rite, then use the Eastern Rite, I guess, or any rite that is compatible with Lutheran doctrine. Popcorn, theatrical smoke and lights, pop bands, Wizard of Oz sound bites (literally!), hip duds, and even sermon outlines that all flow from the entertainment based, man-centered, decision theology of the Methobapticostals is incompatible with the Lutheran doctrine in regard to God, Man, Salvation, the Means of Grace, Law and Gospel, Faith, Holy Communion, etc. As for the Change or Die open letter, I stand behind what was written. We do call their participation (in the end, only Pastor Jeske participated) in this conference as sinful and wrong and demanding public rebuke, for all the reasons stated. "German to English" and "liturgical vs. sectarian" is a complete apples and oranges comparison. Exploring ministry methods together with apostates is far worse than praying together with apostates. In the latter case, no one else is brought into their detestable prayer but the participants. In the former, many souls will be affected as church-growth ministry methods are introduced into parishes. Finally, it's absolutely wrong to compare the honest doctrinal discussions among Bible-believing, Confessions-subscribing Lutherans at the Emmaus Conference with the false type of unity of purpose that was explored with apostates at Change or Die.
Perry Lund said...
I would echo Pastor Rydecki's well written statements on the matters of discussion here. I would echo that by saying that Lutheran doctrine is hidden by the use of incompatible methodologies learned from other theologies. It is dishonest to those souls coming to a Lutheran church to do so; of course many of those churches using tainted theological methods hide the term Lutheran as well. Lastly, these methodologies and poor practices cause offense to many confessional Lutheran, confuse many others who see WELS leaders staying neutral while edification and good order are left to chance. As Lutherans, both called workers and laity, we fail to look at the Book of Concord. I too do not refer to it often and regret my lack of effort in understanding how it reflects the truths of the Bible. In particular in reference to the Solid Declaration of the Formula of Concord in article X, we find the very reason the issue of poor practice in our churches burdens our consciences. I will not bore you with the text copied and pasted here. Rather read it in your copy of the Book on Concord or here at http://bookofconcord.org/sd-adiaphora.php in the Internet. The issues is that "most practices" that do not use the Western Rite are done so in a thoughtless and offensive manner and not in an orderly and becoming way that is profitable, beneficial and that preserves good order. It does not edify the Church, rather it edifies the feelings of our sinful nature. Forgive my aggressive wording, but given it is from the Book of Concord and it is part of our confession, I do not think it is an overstatement. Perry Lund Grace Evangelical Lutheran Church Oskaloosa, IA.
Anonymous said...
Personally I don't see how there can even BE a WELS Synod convention this summer if there is not complete doctrinal unity amongst the members - both laity and pastors. There must be a common starting point. The synod seems to be in complete disarray. Just the fact that we ~ who have been long awaiting some kind of indication to show which side of the fence the WELS leadership would fall on ~ are STILL waiting... speaks volumes. Wait no longer, their silence tells the story loud and clear. It should be the FIRST thing that's discussed at the synod convention to show the church body as a whole where we stand. That should be followed by a proclamation of what we believe and then go from there. It then becomes decision time for every one of us. Do you stay or do you go? Will you be part of the solution or part of the problem? Sadly, there are many members who do not even know the first thing about these matters or choose NOT to know about them. The way it stands now, we are not even in fellowship with many of our own synod members. How does one get past that to carry on a convention? What other matter could top this one in importance and priority? I, for one, will be watching and making decisions of my own afterwards. I have personally written President Schroeder over the past couple years with concerns and encouragement. It's been my prayer, and still is, that under his leadership and with the help of God, our synod resolves its issues and we are able to read, learn, and inwardly digest God's Word- our Great Heritage, keep its teachings pure, and continue to spread them from age to age. Others before us did that for us. It's now OUR responsibility to do it for others and throughout all generations. There needs to be a quick resolution of all these problems so we can get back to the real work of the church. Rhonda Martinez

The Synod of the Apes -
An Epic Battle Fought by Only One Side


The WELS Arizona-California District has pushed many ministers out of the parish, but not one of them is a Shrinker.

Jeff Gunn belongs to the Maggot Church Movement, aka Emergent Church. These are designed to feed from the corpses of congregations in their own synod.

Two others are The CORE and the Stelljes parish near Indianapolis. No sermon! Too tired from working on the float.




My inspiration.

Augustana Ministerium (sic) Meeting Now, Discussing Justification

Bishop-for-Life James Heiser, aka Rt. Rev.


Apparently the Augustana Ministerium (sic) is the recruiting tool for the Evangelical Lutheran Diocese of North America (ELDONA), much like Word Alone and the LCMC.

"It is a curious fact in denominational history, that, as an ordinary rule, the more large, catholic, and churchly the title of a sect, the smaller, narrower, and more sectarian is the body that bears it."
Charles P. Krauth, The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology, Philadelphia: The United Lutheran Publication House, 1871, p. 115.

ELDONA seems to have about a dozen part-time congregations so far. The Augustana Ministerium title is historically confusing, since that was the name of a specific group of Swedish-American Lutheran ministers. In fact, Conrad Bergendoff's book about every single graduate of Augustana Seminary in Rock Island is called The Augustana Ministerium.

I am curious whether this conference is delving into doctrine and history or just repeating talking points from seminary.

Here are some ways to judge an essay or book:
  1. Does the author give a fair description of the opposing view, with accurate quotations? Giving one side of the argument is a logical fallacy called special pleading.
  2. What are the sources? All sides of the issue should be represented in the list of works cited.
  3. Are bromides used as a substitute for doctrinal discernment?

Permanent Flooding in Areas of Japan:

KJV Psalm 29:1 {A Psalm of David.} Give unto the LORD, O ye mighty, give unto the LORD glory and
strength. 2 Give unto the LORD the glory due unto his name; worship the LORD in the beauty of holiness. 3
The voice of the LORD is upon the waters: the God of glory thundereth: the LORD is upon many waters. 4
The voice of the LORD is powerful; the voice of the LORD is full of majesty. 5 The voice of the LORD
breaketh the cedars; yea, the LORD breaketh the cedars of Lebanon. 6 He maketh them also to skip like a
calf; Lebanon and Sirion like a young unicorn. 7 The voice of the LORD divideth the flames of fire. 8 The
voice of the LORD shaketh the wilderness; the LORD shaketh the wilderness of Kadesh. 9 The voice of the
LORD maketh the hinds to calve, and discovereth the forests: and in his temple doth every one speak of his
glory. 10 The LORD sitteth upon the flood; yea, the LORD sitteth King for ever. 11 The LORD will give
strength unto his people; the LORD will bless his people with peace.

Quake shifted Japan; towns now flood at high tide


ISHINOMAKI, Japan – When water begins to trickle down the streets of her coastal neighborhood, Yoshiko Takahashi knows it is time to hurry home.

Twice a day, the flow steadily increases until it is knee-deep, carrying fish and debris by her front door and trapping people in their homes. Those still on the streets slosh through the sea water in rubber boots or on bicycle.

"I look out the window, and it's like our houses are in the middle of the ocean," says Takahashi, who moved in three years ago.

The March 11 earthquake that hit eastern Japan was so powerful it pulled the entire country out and down into the sea. The mostly devastated coastal communities now face regular flooding, because of their lower elevation and damage to sea walls from the massive tsunamis triggered by the quake.

In port cities such as Onagawa and Kesennuma, the tide flows in and out among crumpled homes and warehouses along now uninhabited streets.

A cluster of neighborhoods in Ishinomaki city is rare in that it escaped tsunami damage through fortuitous geography. So, many residents still live in their homes, and they now face a daily trial: The area floods at high tide, and the normally sleepy streets turn frantic as residents rush home before the water rises too high.

"I just try to get all my shopping and chores done by 3 p.m.," says Takuya Kondo, 32, who lives with his family in his childhood home.

Most houses sit above the water's reach, but travel by car becomes impossible and the sewage system swamps, rendering toilets unusable.
Scientists say the new conditions are permanent.
Japan's northern half sits on the North American tectonic plate. The Pacific plate, which is mostly undersea, normally slides under this plate, slowly nudging the country west. But in the earthquake, the fault line between the two plates ruptured, and the North American plate slid up and out along the Pacific plate.

The rising edge of plate caused the sea floor off Japan's eastern coast to bulge up — one measuring station run by Tohoku University reported an underwater rise of 16 feet (5 meters) — creating the tsunami that devastated the coast. The portion of the plate under Japan was pulled lower as it slid toward the ocean, which caused a corresponding plunge in elevation under the country.

Some areas in Ishinomaki moved southeast 17 feet (5.3 meters) and sank 4 feet (1.2 meters) lower.
"We thought this slippage would happen gradually, bit by bit. We didn't expect it to happen all at once," says Testuro Imakiire, a researcher at Japan's Geospatial Information Authority, the government body in charge of mapping and surveys.

Imakiire says the quake was powerful enough to move the entire country, the first time this has been recorded since measurements began in the late 19th century. In Tokyo, 210 miles (340 kilometers) from Ishinomaki, parts of the city moved 9 inches (24 centimeters) seaward.

The drop lower was most pronounced around Ishinomaki, the area closest to the epicenter. The effects are apparent: Manholes, supported by underground piping, jut out of streets that fell around them. Telephone poles sank even farther, leaving wires at head height.

As surrounding areas clear rubble and make plans to rebuild, residents in this section of Ishinomaki are stuck in limbo — their homes are mostly undamaged and ineligible for major insurance claims or government compensation, but twice a day the tide swamps their streets.

"We can't really complain, because other people lost so much," says Yuichiro Mogi, 43, as his daughters examine a dead blowfish floating near his curb.

The earthquake and tsunami left more than 25,000 people either dead or missing, and many more lost their homes and possessions.

Mogi noticed that the daily floods were slowly carrying away the dirt foundation of his house, and built a small embankment of sandbags to keep the water at bay. The shipping company worker moved here 10 years ago, because he got a good deal on enough land to build a home with a spacious front lawn, where he lives with his four children and wife.

Most of the residences in the area are relatively new.

"Everyone here still has housing loans they have to pay, and you can't give away this land, let alone sell it," says Seietsu Sasaki, 57, who also has to pay off loans on two cars ruined in the flooding.

Sasaki, who moved in 12 years ago with his extended family, says he hopes the government can build flood walls to protect the neighborhood. He never paid much attention to the tides in the past, but now checks the newspaper for peak times each morning.

Officials have begun work on some embankments, but with much of the city devastated, resources are tight. Major construction projects to raise the roads were completed before the tsunami, but much of that work was negated when the ground below them sank.

The constant flooding means that construction crews can only work in short bursts, and electricity and running water were restored only about two weeks ago. The area still doesn't have gas for hot water, and residents go to evacuee shelters to bathe.

"We get a lot of requests to build up these areas, but we don't really have the budget right now," says Kiyoshi Koizumi, a manager in Ishinomaki's roads and infrastructure division.

Sasaki says he hopes they work something out soon: Japan's heavy summer rains begin in about a month, and the higher tides in autumn will rise well above the floor of his house.

Jack D. Kilcrease Alert


I saw that Roger Kovaciny had a heart attack in Russia and got fixed up cheap. That prompted me to look up his class at The Sausage Factory.

http://archive.wls.wels.net/files/1977.jpg

There I saw a Jack D. Kilcrease in the class of 1977. Sparky Brenner graduated then, too. So did Howard Festerling.

I know Jack reads this blog all the time, because a post by Paul McCain, MDiv, prompted Jack to mention their mutual universalism in connection with Rob Bell.

The bio for the blogger does not match with the Mequon information, so I am curious. Coincidence? Relatives?

"We fix you up cheap, Rogerski. Recycled stents; work good. Charge $5 thou. Bill $10 thou. Split difference."

AC V on Demi-Semi Freedom in WELS



AC V has left a new comment on your post "Time To Escape From The Synod of the Apes.Why Pay...":

From the recently released Book of Reports and Memorials for the WELS synod convention this summer:

"One continuing area of discussion is the matter of congregational practices in the areas of worship, outreach, and organization. While fully committed to the scriptural principle of Christian freedom, the COP continues...."

Shouldn't that read: "While fully committed to the Book of Concord as our Synod's standard of doctrine and practice..."?

No, read the current wording as: "While fully committed to WELS pietistic rugged individualism, the COP continues to...."

"...pay lip service to liturgical practices while promoting 'innovative ministries' via mission counselors and Church Growth conferences."

(Contra AC XXIV: "Falsely are our churches accused of abolishing the Mass; for the Mass is retained among us, and celebrated with the highest reverence. Nearly all the usual ceremonies are also preserved,... Forasmuch, therefore, as the Mass with us has the example of the Church, taken from the Scripture and the Fathers, we are confident that it cannot be disapproved, especially since public ceremonies, for the most part like those hither to in use, are retained." And AC Abuses Which Have Been Corrected: "But it can readily be judged that nothing would serve better to maintain the dignity of ceremonies, and to nourish reverence and pious devotion among the people than if the ceremonies were observed rightly in the churches.")

"...to ridicule every Sunday Holy Communion as legalistic and a threat to the status quo." (i.e. "Are you saying we've been doing it wrong all these years?")

Contra AC XXIV: "Now, forasmuch as the Mass is such a giving of the Sacrament, we hold one communion every holy-day,...")

"...to reject as Romish Private Absolution as a regular part of parish life."

(Contra AC XXV: Confession in the churches is not abolished among us; for it is not usual to give the body of the Lord, except to them that have been previously examined and absolved.... Our people are taught that they should highly prize the absolution, as being the voice of God, and pronounced by God's command.")

Hey, WELS pastors out there. Try this experiment. At the synod convention this summer you wear a suit with clerical collar and have your buddy wear jeans with a Hawaiian shirt and note the reactions each of you gets from fellow clergy and district officials. What will "WELS Christian freedom" affirm? Clerical collar? Or Hawaiian shirt? You already know the answer.

Luther - The Word of God Is a Scourge


"Thereby I behead no one, scourge no one with a rod; but with my mouth I whip, punish, flog, and judge. Thus Christ wields an oral sword, not a fisted one. The Word of God is the sword with which He punishes the whole world." What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed. Ewald M. Plass St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, III, p. 1478. Sermon, February 9, 1538. Isaiah 11:4.

Johann Gerhard - On Faith


"The entire Scripture testifies that the merits of Christ are received in no other way than through faith, not to mention that it is impossible to please God without faith, Hebrews 11:6, let alone to be received into eternal life. In general, St. Paul concludes concerning this [matter] in Romans 3:28: Thus we hold then that a man becomes righteous without the works of the Law--only through faith."
Johann Gerhard, A Comprehensive Explanation of Holy Baptism and the Lord's Supper, 1610, ed. D. Berger, J. Heiser, Malone, Texas: Repristination Press, 2000, p. 165. Hebrews 11:6; Romans 3:28.

"To this incline your ears, and be persuaded that God speaks through men and forgives you your sins; this, of course, requires faith."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed. John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983 II, p. 200.

Luther: The Word of God Turned the Roman Empire into a Pile of Rubbish


"The Word seems to be a trifling matter. But it proved to be a thunderbolt so powerful that its impact turned the whole Roman Empire with its wisdom, might, and sanctity into a pile of rubbish. There lay Minerva and the Pantheon with all its idols. So Christ the Hero beat everything down among Jews and Gentiles through the marvelous power of His Word in the apostles." What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed. Ewald M. Plass St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, III,

The page number is missing. Would someone supply it from the 3-volume set? Thanks.

Emmaus Topic Assigned for 2012



Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Banned in Bay View.This Woulda Killed the Reformat...":

The topic assigned to President Harrison is, "The History and Prospects of Free Conferences" April 19-20, 2012.

***

GJ - I hope there were topics rejected for being even more boring and superficial:
  1. Jay Webber - Collar or Rabat Vest? Response by Bishop-for-Life James Heiser.
  2. Roger Kovaciny - Safe Driving. Response by James Tiefel.
  3. Paul Kelm - Copy and Paste: Plagiarism or The Lutheran Struggle To Survive? Response by Tim Glende and Ski, with help from Craig Groeschel.

Monkey See, Monkey Do



First Baptist Fulton - Baptist
http://www.fbcfulton.org/events/        Fulton
http://www.fbcthoreau.com/events/       Thoreau
Crown of Life Lutheran Church - (W)ELS  Corona, CA  (Buchie's district!)
http://www.crownoflifechurch.net/about/