![]() |
| Lutherans pay me to explain this to them, and they love it. |
The C and C apostates always push the envelope. Then, when they are called out on the carpet for their misdeeds, they act clueless. They knew what Leonard Sweet stood for, but they invited him anyway. At my former congregation, I plunged a dagger into the heart when I confronted the congregation president about the connection that Jeff Davis has with C and C. This was after I informed him that they had invited Ed Stetzer to speak at a C and C conference.
![]() |
| Jeff Davis, Cornerstone, Church and Change board. |
The president claimed that when he talked to Mr. Davis about it, he was told that Stetzer was "dis-invited" due to the controversy that was created. So, Stetzer was invited to speak. But, the C and C'ers claimed afterward that he never was invited. So, with this level of dishonesty, why would you pay Cornerstone big bucks to show you how to fleece the members of your congregation? The president also defended Stetzer by stating that old Ed had actually written a paper that was critical of the Emergent Church movement. My humble opinion would be that Stetzer more closely resembles a "Crypto Emergent" and the C and C guys use tactics very close to the Crypto Calvinists.
![]() |
| Ed Stetzer, on the right, is a typical, angry, Emergent Church promoter. |
![]() |
| WELS - "We love Stetzer. He has a Fuller drive-by degree and he cannot spell either." |
***
GJ - I kept the Stetzer invitation in the news. Finally the Conference of Pussycats told Church and Change to withdraw the invitation - something that never happened with Leonard Sweet or Martin Marty. The radicals depend on things blowing over. They hate seeing the story pursued.
The first step was denying that Church and Change invited Stetzer, so I reproduced the link and the wording of Stetzer's Tweet and blog. In both places he bragged about being hired by Church and Change and a Missouri Synod group. Stetzer had both events on his web calendar as well. That invitation happened after Kudu Don Patterson took a group of WELS workers to Exponential in Orlando, Florida. Stetzer was a featured speaker there. I am sure that was a co-inky-dink that the invitation happened AFTER the Exponential Conference.
That is the fun thing about narcissists on the Net - they leave footprints everywhere. Stetzer even made fun of conservative Lutherans while boasting about being hired by them.
After the invitation was withdrawn (which meant paying a kill fee), the Changers said it was a lie that Stetzer was ever invited. I get contacts from WELS pastors who have heard I was lying about something. So I sent him the link to the Twitter and blog.
The ending of WELS Church and Change this time is just as much of a lie as it was under Gurgle, who claimed the same thing. At that time an innocent told me that Gurgle ordered it shut down. I said, "Then why are they registering people for their next C and C conference on the WELS.net website?" Response - "They are?" I provided the link. Like I said, narcissists on the Net leave their footprints everywhere.
Under SP Schroeder, Church and Change says they are shut down, but they leave their website and documents available for those who know. Mark Schroeder promotes and protects the Church and Changers, who have changed the color of their fleece but not their agenda.
KJV Matthew 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. 21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
![]() |
| WELS Church and Change. Time of Grace. Men of His Word. Grace in Action. WELS Prayer Network. Jars of Clay. Cornerstone. Youth Conference. Etc. Etc. Etc. |





4 comments:
It seems the LCMS has plenty of campus chapels, and their property values have gone astronomical given how they are snuggled in among growing universities. Now, however, LCMS districts are seeking to balance their overdraft checkbooks and pay their exorbitant salaries and benefits and bloated staff, by selling them off right under the existing congregations and their chaplains. Then the congregation is given $245,000 or less from the proceeds, and told to find a new church home, but that's only enough to buy a building of any size far away from the campus that they were meant to serve:
http://steadfastlutherans.org/?p=6503
Rev. Fisk got Andrew Preus to blog for the BJS blog, and Andrew's first post is on hymns and UOJ:
New blogger:
http://steadfastlutherans.org/?p=16782
His first post is on hymnody and UOJ:
http://steadfastlutherans.org/?p=4190
(I think someone else might have mentioned this already in an Ich-comment, but just be to sure...)
bruce-church, read the comments following Andrew Preus' UOJ blather. First comment is from Rev. James Schulz who drops Andrews UOJ on it's head.
Andrew's first defence is the standard taking of the Office of the Keys out of Confessional context. He fails to quote where the BOC states, "6] Let any one of the adversaries come forth and tell us when remission of sins takes place. O good God, what darkness there is! They doubt whether it is in attrition or in contrition that remission of sins occurs. And if it occurs on account of contrition, what need is there of absolution, what does the power of the keys effect, if sins have been already remitted?..."
http://www.bookofconcord.org/defense_10_repentance.php
The debate is interesting and quite typical. The error of UOJ is identified by Schulz but the Stormtroopers simply repeat their talking points.
Post a Comment