 |
| Dr. Robert Preus always taught UOJ? In 1982 he offered the best quotations against it, the same ones used in Justification and Rome. |
Dr. Robert Preus' 1982 essay about justification is linked here.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5009355/Robert%20Preus%20-%20Justification_essay.pdf
If someone would like to reproduce this in Word format, I can post it so the entire essay is easier to read and share.
Let me know if you have the time and inclination - gregjackson1948@qwest.net
---
Medium Rare wrote this:
Okay, just thought maybe I should read through the Preus paper:
When I hit this line I stopped;
I have to say "How in the world could a theologian come up with
that?"
What part of the Bible does that line up with? As I said earlier.
John 6: 32-71 paints an entirely different picture.
As we both know , it was just one giant step for pietists, called
"Lutheran", toward going completely for Universalism.
I can't figure out what is farther off. Calvinist that deny the real
presence etc. or Pietist (called Lutheran) that teach that all were declared
righteous 2000+ years ago. Oh my!
***
GJ - My response is that the essay is a mixture of UOJ and JBFA. The interesting part is his early use of quotations that obliterate UOJ. I will post those below. They appeared in Justification and Rome, many years later. However, the book contains no UOJ.
 |
| Quoted in the 1982 essay, page 7, and in Justification and Rome. Furtive UOJ can be found asserted on page 9 of the essay. |
 |
| This is a paragraph on page 12 of the essay. |
