Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Jack Cascione Dusts Off the Iron Maiden and Polishes the Thumb Screws




You are invited to discuss this issue on
October 23, 2012

Pastor Suspended for False Doctrine by WELS but Honored in LCMS
In an era of declining Lutheranism we see a spark of vitality in the Wisconsin Synod suspending Pastor Paul Rydecki from its clergy roster for the nearly extinct charge of false doctrine.  While two-thirds of Lutherans in American are accepting homosexual clergy (ELCA) and Christian News publishes reports of open false doctrine in the LCMS in nearly every issue, suspension for false doctrine in the WELS has a medieval tone.  The WELS has not issued any official public charges but there has been a lot of writing on the subject.

Rydecki’s defenders tend to ignore the importance of correct doctrine and define love as permissiveness.  The medical profession would like to have surgical patients cut them as much slack as laity give pastors who are still coming to grips with doctrinal terms?

[GJ - Jack has a rich fantasy life. There is no relationship between the truth and the description above.]

Christian News Published the Story
The October 15 issue of Christian News reports Rydecki wrote: “only those who believe in Jesus are justified before God.”  This statement needs more explanation.  Rydecki leaves the door open for the false doctrine that faith causes salvation rather than divine grace.  Faith doesn’t cause salvation any more than soil around seed makes the rain fall.  “My faith looks up to Thee Thou lamb of Calvary” only takes place after conversion.

The Wisconsin Synod California-Arizona district president Jon Buchholz recently suspended Pastor Rydecki from the WELS clergy roster because he refuses to teach the doctrine of Objective Justification.  The average layperson has no idea what that is.  Rydecki could clear up the entire controversy by simply agreeing that the world is declared righteous in Christ.

[GJ - There you have it, the Walther-Pieper-Rambach-Webber absolution of the world. David Becker reported the story sympathetically, because many people think UOJ is hogwash.]

What is Objective Justification?
The layperson who doesn’t know what justification means has not been reading the Bible nor (sic) understands what happened at the Reformation.  The words justify, justification, and justified appear in the KJV New Testament 40 times.   Being justified means being declared righteous before God through faith by the merits of Christ on the cross.  Objective Justification means the world is justified by Christ’s payment on the cross for all its sins.  It does not mean the world has faith and everyone is going to heaven.  The term Subjective Justification applies to those who believe and trust that Christ paid for their sins.

[GJ - In other words, to justify means to be declared righteous, and that is never, ever applied to unbelievers. If you have Attention Deficit Disorder, the paragraph above makes sense.]

What Did Luther Say About This?
Without using the terms objective or subjective justification Luther describes the distinction between these two doctrines as follows:

“Even he who does not believe that he is free and his sins forgiven shall also learn, in due time, how assuredly his sins were forgiven, even though he did not believe it… He who does not accept what the keys give receives, of course, nothing.  But that is not the key’s fault.  Many do not believe the gospel, but this does not mean that the gospel is not true or effective.  A king gives you a castle.  If you do not accept it, then it is not the king’s fault, nor is he guilty of a lie.  But you have deceived yourself and the fault is yours.  The king certainly gave it.” (LW 40, 366ff)
Luther’s point here is that divine grace is resistible.  There are untold numbers of p eople going to eternal damnation because they reject God’s saving grace in Jesus Christ.  On the other hand, no one has the power to make a decision to believe in Jesus Christ.  The question of why some are saved and not others, according to the Lutheran Confessions, cannot be answered and is only in God’s secret counsel.  The Gospel is God’s gracious offer of salvation through faith in Christ.
[GJ - UOJ Stormtroopers have a quia subscription to this Luther quotation about the objective truth of the atonement. He is not saying that unbelievers are forgiven. He explicitly denies that in countless places well known to any literate Lutheran (i.e.- not Cascione, not McCain, not Rolf Preus, not John Moldstad, not Jon Buchholz, not SP Mark Schroeder).They never quote the Large Catechism, where Luther clearly opposes their dogma.]

What Does the Bible Say?
Anyone who sees a contradiction between, “Behold the Lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world” (John 1:29) and “by grace are you saved through faith” (Eph. 2:8) does not have a correct understanding of the Gospel.  The Bible says in numerous verses that God has forgiven the sins of the world:
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.  John 3:16
2 Corinthians 5:19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.  2Co5:19
1Peter 3:18 For Christ also died for sins once for all, the just for the unjust, in order that He might bring us to God, having been put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit; 
1John 2:2 and He Himself is the propitiation for our sins; and not for ours only, but also for those of the whole world.
John 4:42, 2Peter 2:20, and 1John 4:14 all declared that Christ is the savior of the world.  Rydecki makes us doubt if Christ succeeded.  Rydecki places a wedge between God’s forgiveness, love, reconciliation, death in Christ, propitiation for the sins of the world and God declaring the world righteous in Christ.  How can the world be forgiven, reconciled, loved, and benefit from Christ’s propitiation for its sins, and not be justified by God?  Or does God only love the believers?

[GJ - Only Jack could take the Little Gospel, John 3:16, and turn it inside-out into UOJ. The rest of his special pleading is equally inane. Has he read the book that Rydecki translated? I doubt it.]

What do the Lutheran Confessions say?
"That through Christ the human race is truly redeemed and reconciled with God, who, by His faultless obedience, suffering, and death, has merited for us the righteousness which avails before God, and eternal life." FC, SD, Election. Par. 15, Tappert 619
“Our righteousness rests n either upon his [Christ’s] divine nature nor upon his human nature but upon the entire person of Christ, who as God and man in his sole, total, as perfect obedience is our righteousness.” FC, SD, Righteousness, Par. 549, Tappert 549
If Christ is not the righteousness of unbelievers, it is not possible to become a believer.

Evidence against Rydecki
Consider some of the evidence that Pastor Rydecki is confused on the doctrine of justific ation.
1. “The Confessions do not speak of a sense in which all sinners have already been justified before God whether they believe in Christ or not, nor do I believe the Scriptures to teach such a thing, yet such is commonly heralded among Lutherans today as the ‘central teaching of the Bible.’” (Rev. Paul Rydecki, "Do We Want To Be Dresden Lutherans?" P.10)
2. From "The Biblical Doctrine of Justification on One Page:" by Paul Rydecki
“God credits the righteousness of Christ only to those who believe in Jesus, and thus justifies only those w ho believe in Jesus. (John 3:16-18, 36; Luke 18:14; Acts 13:39; Rom. 3:26; 4:5; 10:10; Gal. 2:16; Phil. 3:8-9)”
3. Pastor Rydecki preached a sermon titled: "Faith is the difference between those who are justified and those who are not."
4. The Wisconsin California Arizona District President asked Pastor Rydecki to answer two questions and Rydecki refused to give direct answers.
1) “Did God forgive the sins of the world when Jesus died on the cross?”
Rydecki’s Answer: Yes. "He forgave to all people the sin, which no one could avoid." AP, IV, 103
2) “Has God justified all sinners for the sake of Christ?”
Rydecki’s Answer: Yes. "The human race is truly redeemed and reconciled with God through Christ." FC, SD, Election, 15
5. Pastor Rydecki is the translator (from the original Latin) of a 16th century, recently published book available from Amazon: “Theses Opposed to Huberianism: A Defense of the Luther an Doctrine of Justification” [Paperback] Aegidius Hunnius (Author).  In this translation Rydecki shows that Hunnius, a follower of Luther, rejected the teachings of objective justification. However, in the opinion of many, including this author, Rydecki has misrepresented Hunnius’ position.

[GJ - Cascione does not understand the Scriptures, the Means of Grace, the efficacy of the Word, the doctrine of the Holy Spirit, the Book of Concord, or the post-Concord era. QED, he is equally expert on Hunnius and Huber.]

Ryd ecki Courted by LCMS Sacerdotalists
Rydecki, an exceptional parish scholar, wants to be a Dresden Lutheran.  This is his term for the Lutherans who migrated from Dresden Germany to the United States beginning in the late 1830’s.  The Dresden Lutherans were also practicing extreme Sacerdotalism, meaning that if the pastor didn’t have the sacrament of ordination, the Gospel, Baptism, and Lord’s Supper would not be effective.  LCMS sacerdotalists (also known as Hyper-Euro-Lutherans who want to revive pre-Walther European Sacerdotalism) publish Gottesdienst.  They recently honored Rydecki with “The Saber of Boldness” for his stance against the Church Growth Movement.  Depending on which LCMS or WELS church one visits today, the pastor may appear in a polo shirt and conduct the service like a YMCA camp counselor with a backup praise band and/or vocalist.  Rydecki’s bold stand against church growth has drawn him to the LCMS sacerdotal movement that views the clergy as the 4th means of grace.  Martin Stephan used to call himself the chief mediator of the means of grace.  The LCMS sacerdotalists’ mantra is “Where the bishop is, there the church is also.”

[GJ - Papal promoter Paul McCain was a frequent posted on LQ until recently. He was also on Tim Gende's Emergent Church blog. Pope Paul Without a Call gets around, and gets banned.]

The LCMS Went Through This in 1981
Christ's words from the cross, “Father forgive them” mean Jesus prayed that God forgive the whole world.  However, I once heard Walter Maier II, back in January of 1981, tell an audience that “Father forgive them” means only those who have faith, such as the one thief on the cross and the centurion.  Rydeki has placed himself in the same corner.  Either Rydecki is going to agree that when God forgives people they are also justified or that when Jesus spoke the words “Father forgiven them” He was only speaking about the thief on the cross and the centurion.

LCMS President J. A. O. Preus published his opposition to Maier’s teaching in the “Lutheran Witness Reporter” which led to the election of Ralph Bohlmann as LCMS President instead of Maier.  The LCMS Council of District Presiden ts has long since decided to avoid doctrinal issues and turn LCMS congregations into hymnbook free zones and entertainment venues.

In general, church bodies today who indulge in doctrinal discipline are viewed as arcane anachronists, hardly the stuff of praise bands and hootenanny worship.  In other words, doctrinal discipline is bad for business.  But then, what about truth?  Ten of the Apostles were executed.  If a church body is called to pick up its cross and follow after Christ, defense of the doctrine of justification is the highest ground they can walk.

[GJ - The UOJ always forces their argument through false paradoxes. Either they must agree with Jack or they are obvious heretics. Jack earned an A in talking point repetition for this little essay, an F in Biblical exegesis, and a LOL for logic.]



---

A. Berean has left a new comment on your post "Jack Cascione Dusts Off the Iron Maiden and Polish...":

Under what Luther says: Luther's Works American Edition, Vol. 25, Lectures on Romans - "God imputes to none but the believer."

So, that's something to consider... 



Indeed.

4 comments:

A. Berean said...

Under what Luther says: Luther's Works American Edition, Vol. 25, Lectures on Romans - "God imputes to none but the believer."

So, that's something to consider...

Daryl Meyer said...

Oh to have been a fly on the wall when Rydecki answered the ultimatum; the parallels to the Diet of Worms are uncanny! People have long noted the WELS' "Lift High the Cash" Tetzels, and now they have their very own Eck. How fitting that this should all transpire as we approach the anniversary of the Reformation! Rydecki's quotes are priceless because they beg one to read further in order to understand the entire context. I won't mention the Ambrose quote since you've recently tackled it (yet again!), but what follows after the FC SD quote can likewise never bear enough emphasis because it provides a very simple and succinct summary of our Christian faith from atonement to repentance, faith, justification, sanctification, preservation, and everlasting life. Every confirmation student should memorize these eight points:

1. That the human race is truly redeemed and reconciled with God through Christ, who, by His faultless (innocency) obedience, suffering, and death, has merited for us the righteousness which avails before God, and eternal life.

2. That such merit and benefits of Christ shall be presented, offered, and distributed to us through His Word and Sacraments.

3. That by His Holy Ghost, through the Word, when it is preached, heard, and pondered, He will be efficacious and active in us, convert hearts to true repentance, and preserve them in true faith.

4. That He will justify all those who in true repentance receive Christ by a true faith, and will receive them into grace, the adoption of sons, and the inheritance of eternal life.

5. That He will also sanctify in love those who are thus justified, as St. Paul says. Eph. 1, 4.

6. That He also will protect them in their great weakness against the devil, the world, and the flesh, and rule and lead them in His ways, raise them again (place His hand beneath them), when they stumble, comfort them under the cross and in temptation, and preserve them (for life eternal).

7. That He will also strengthen, increase, and support to the end the good work which He has begun in them, if they adhere to God's Word, pray diligently, abide in God's goodness (grace), and faithfully use the gifts received.

8. That finally He will eternally save and glorify in life eternal those whom He has elected, called, and justified.

Your illustration of Luther's Gal. 3:13 commentary from LW 26 is one of my favorites. His commentary of Gal. 2:15,16 in the Kregel edition is similar: But where Christ and faith be not, there is no remission or covering of sins, but imputation of sins and condemnation.

A very blessed Reformation to one and all!

LutheranUniversalistsBeDamned said...

GJ asks, "Has [Cascione] read the book that Rydecki translated?" It is difficult to tell, but there is so little of it mentioned by Casione, and that only in general terms, that GJ's conclusion, "I doubt it," seems correct. One thing is certain from Cascione's comments, however: others have read Hunnius' "Theses Opposed to Huberianism," and recognize the damage it does to the position of Universal Justification, prompting Cascione to publicly join "them" in questioning Rydecki's integrity as a translator. Cascione writes: "Pastor Rydecki is the translator (from the original Latin) of a 16th century, recently published book available from Amazon: 'Theses Opposed to Huberianism: A Defense of the Luther an Doctrine of Justification'... In this translation Rydecki shows that Hunnius, a follower of Luther, rejected the teachings of objective justification. However, in the opinion of many, including this author, Rydecki has misrepresented Hunnius’ position."

This statement from Cascione, which is also representing "the opinion of many," stands in direct contradiction to objections which immediately surfaced upon the publication of Rydecki's translation, that these Theses applied in any way to Objective Justification. One inconsequential person, who evidently hadn't read the book before he opened his mouth, was successful in spreading the rumor that "Huber only taught Universal Justification, not Universal Objective Justification," that Hunnius' work therefore does not apply to UOJ, and that Lutheran Universalists need not be concerned that their doctrine may actually significantly depart from the doctrine of Scripture and the Reformers. Not so, according to Cascione, as he points out that "the opinion of many" is that these Theses do in fact oppose Universal Justification (or UOJ, or OJ, or whatever), and, instead of even considering that Walther's stark departure from the "sound pattern of words" used by Lutherans for centuries might actually teach error, immediately assume that Rydecki is an unfaithful translator. This is profound arrogance at work. This is profound arrogance in positions of power.

Regarding Hunnius, I expect two things: one, a translation war. No doubt, further editions will be published by UOJ advocates for the purpose of exposing Rydecki's unfaithfulness. The response of faithful Christians in this case will be to disbelieve either party in this affair, and instead to turn to impartial Latin scholars, perhaps even outside the Church, who don't care what Hunnius said.

Second, I expect that we haven't heard the last from Hunnius on the subject of Universal Justification. It may be that, if there is yet any doubt what Hunnius actually said, or meant, in the 'Theses' translated by Rydecki, additional translation efforts will offer undeniable clarity on the position of Hunnius and the Wittenberg faculty.

LutheranUniversalistsBeDamned said...

We can, however, charitably conclude that Cascione utterly failed to read one important work he cited in his public criticism of Rydecki: Rydecki's own recent essay, "Do we Want to be Dresden Lutherans?" Cascione writes, "Rydecki, an exceptional parish scholar, wants to be a Dresden Lutheran. This is his term for the Lutherans who migrated from Dresden Germany to the United States beginning in the late 1830’s." This is not only an error of fact, but its use is clearly calculated to serve his personal political purposes, to tie Rydecki to the same "LCMS sacerdotalists" against whom he has been struggling for quite some time (arguing in favor of Walther's congregational polity and issues of Church & Ministry related to it). This is most unfortunate for Cascione's credibility, as this error appears in the climax of his criticism and thus only succeeds in showing that his entire criticism of Rydecki was meant only to serve his own political purposes. This is a charitible conclusion, for if it should be discovered that Cascione did actually read Rydecki's paper, and still misrepresented Rydecki's use of the moniker "Dresden Lutheran" to serve his purposes, then he is also guilty of defamation.

If one cares to actually read Rydecki's paper (still available on the Intrepid Lutheran's blog, under the link to their Conference information), he will see plainly that the term "Dresden Lutheran" refers to the location of the BoC's publication 431 years ago. It refers to holding to the Confessions as Scripture's testimony, rather than holding to "Synod," a fickle political organization, as the source of such testimony. In fact, in no place in Rydecki's paper does the name "Walther" or the term "Missouri" even appear. Both Walther and Missouri were completely overlooked in Rydecki's paper, and rightfully so. It is a fitting rebuke to Synod worshipers like Cascione who evidently can't bear to have the names of Walther and Missouri and other celebrity figures from the old SynCon, absent from works addressing Confessional Lutheranism.