Sunday, August 5, 2012

Hebrews 10 Graphics






---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Hebrews 10 Graphics":

Ichabod -

I think that the picture with Christ on the Cross with the Hebrews 10:38-39 Scripture more or less exposes and destroys the whole falsehood of universal objective justification.

UOJ (universal objective justification) is not only based upon going hog wild over Christ's Atonement. It over emphasizes the Atonement at the expense of Scripture's teaching about the Holy Spirit's work of the "new birth," - conversion. [John 3:1-21 - in context]

But, be that as it may, another form of UOJ is basically based upon the false notion of "sovereign immunity," - that being, that God's Ten Commandment laws no longer apply to Christians, since Christians [supposedly] cannot (genuinely) "sin."

This incorrect and damning "sovereign immunity" doctrine is sometimes [now] labeled “freedom in Christ,” because it is purported that the Christian is "no longer 'under the law.'"

"Sovereign Immunity's" (comparative) analogy is found in the modern day scenario of a diplomat upon foreign soil. Should the diplomat commit a crime that is either punishable by fine; temporary incarceration; life in prison; or, the death penalty, - that diplomat is (therefore) immune to the penalty because he is not on his native soil but upon another's "foreign" soil, and is under immunity protection. And, as the destructive analogy plays out; since the Christian is [actually] living in the heavenlies [Colossians 3:1-2] what transpires here on earth, is therefore inconsequential and is "covered" by the Atonement and the new creation [new man] "immunity."

Finally, I believe that all forms of universalism are heresy - including "universal objective justification" and the one I described above - "sovereign immunity" ["can't sin]. They all can be lumped together under the major heresy category of Antinomianism. And, who initiated that description? None other than Luther, who correctly taught Scripture's chief doctrine of God's grace and justification by faith alone! [Ephesians 2:8-9]

Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org

www.moralmatters.org 

The Ninth Sunday after Trinity. Luke 16:1ff.
The Steward of Unrighteousness




The Ninth Sunday after Trinity, 2012


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn # 628            Shepherd of Tender Youth               3:74
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed             p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #283            God’s Word               3:90

A Difficult Lesson

The Communion Hymn # 175            When I                        3:93
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 50                    Lord Dismiss Us                3:86

KJV 1 Corinthians 10:1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; 2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; 3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat; 4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ. 5 But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness. 6 Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted.

KJV Luke 16:1 And he said also unto his disciples, There was a certain rich man, which had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods. 2 And he called him, and said unto him, How is it that I hear this of thee? give an account of thy stewardship; for thou mayest be no longer steward. 3 Then the steward said within himself, What shall I do? for my lord taketh away from me the stewardship: I cannot dig; to beg I am ashamed. 4 I am resolved what to do, that, when I am put out of the stewardship, they may receive me into their houses. 5 So he called every one of his lord's debtors unto him, and said unto the first, How much owest thou unto my lord? 6 And he said, An hundred measures of oil. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and sit down quickly, and write fifty. 7 Then said he to another, And how much owest thou? And he said, An hundred measures of wheat. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and write fourscore. 8 And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light. 9 And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations.


Ninth Sunday After Trinity

Lord God, heavenly Father, who hast bountifully given us Thy blessing and our daily bread: We beseech Thee, preserve us from covetousness, and so quicken our hearts that we willingly share Thy blessed gifts with our needy brethren; that we may be found faithful stewards of Thy gifts, and abide in Thy grace when we shall be removed from our stewardship, and shall come before Thy judgment, through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.



A Difficult Lesson

This lesson proves how difficult a parable can be – impossible for the unbeliever to discern.

Human reason looks at the Parable of the Unrighteous Steward and says, “This teaches me that I can buy my way into heaven.”

That is why Luther said it must be taught correctly or the monks and priests would make a lot of money from it.

And that is exactly what has happened among the Lutherans today.

First we have to understand the meaning of mammon. This parable is about mammon rather than money itself. Money is a tool for exchange, something the Greeks under Alexander realized. Rather than hoard gold, as the ancient rulers did, they coined it to pay for expenses and buy war goods.

Mammon refers to that money which is in excess of normal needs – food, housing, and clothing.

So the parable seems to say, “Make friends of the mammon of unrighteousness and you can be welcomed into heaven.”

Luther found people easily drawn into despair over works, because that was all they learned from the Medieval Church. This parable is ideal for teaching the wrong lesson.

KJV Luke 16:1 And he said also unto his disciples, There was a certain rich man, which had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods.

First, it needs to be emphasized that this steward was an unbeliever. He is called unrighteous or unjust in the parable. His actions are not commended at all, but his shrewdness is. This can be called an example of arguing from the lesser to the major, typical in Judaism.

If a dishonest, bad, unbelieving steward can be so shrewd that he saves his own job, then how much more should believers be clever in the use of their resources, especially in taking care of their neighbors and the poor?

The steward is the business manager of a large family estate. He takes care of all the daily routines and manages the money. This steward did not do his job well. It was not a matter of bad luck. “He wasted his goods.” Someone had discovered the dishonesty and reported him to the wealthy man. “The same was accused unto him”

Lenski:
In his masterly way Jesus places the essentials before us with a few simple words: the rich man and the dishonest steward. This man’s business was extensive; he employed a general manager with full power to handle all affairs as we see from his dealings in v. 5–7, and the values of his affairs were large. Jesus at once places us into a typically worldly atmosphere which is unlike that of the preceding parables. This steward is crooked—nothing new in managers who have powers like his.
Lenski, R. C. H.: The Interpretation of St. Luke's Gospel. Minneapolis, MN : Augsburg Publishing House, 1961, S. 823.


2 And he called him, and said unto him, How is it that I hear this of thee? give an account of thy stewardship; for thou mayest be no longer steward.

This is not an investigation but a firing – not “Did it happen?” But “How did it happen?”
The steward has to close the books, give an account of his management. The steward has one last bit of work to do before he is sent into unemployment.

3 Then the steward said within himself, What shall I do? for my lord taketh away from me the stewardship: I cannot dig; to beg I am ashamed. 4 I am resolved what to do, that, when I am put out of the stewardship, they may receive me into their houses.

This is a bit of humor built into the story. The manager quickly assesses what he has to do because:
  1. I cannot dig for a living.
  2. I am ashamed to beg.

As a fired manager, his prospects are not good, especially since he has probably been living high on the hog and enjoying a high profile.

But immediately he has a plan so that he can get another similar plan. He is not going to waste his energy in sorrow and regret.

5 So he called every one of his lord's debtors unto him, and said unto the first, How much owest thou unto my lord? 6 And he said, An hundred measures of oil. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and sit down quickly, and write fifty. 7 Then said he to another, And how much owest thou? And he said, An hundred measures of wheat. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and write fourscore.

For anyone taught about honesty, this is a shock. He has already wasted his employer’s money. Now the manager is reducing the goods owed to the owner – as a final effort in keeping employed (rather than turning over a new leaf and being a good manager).

The men owing the money are bound to be pleased by this, since the reductions are considerable. One receives a 50% discount. Another, 20%. The two mentioned are just samples of the many who owe the master. He called “every one of his lord’s debtors.”

8 And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.

Jesus did not say anyone was a believer or a good person in this parable. The master is shrewd, so he immediately appreciates the cleverness of his servant.
It reminds me of two dog breeds we watch over – the Cattle Dog and the German Shepherd. Sassy is  a combination of both, and both are known for “independent thinking.” That is exasperating at times, but also something to admire. Once Sassy realized that I did not always lock her kennel door, she began pushing it out each time, to check. Sometimes it is shut but not locked, to keep Precious from stealing her food. Most of the time I lock it so we can go out for a time and not worry about her separation anxiety. She is calmer in her kennel. Sassy knows the implication of each trip. The post office ends in the dog park, so going to the post office is exciting. Dairy Queen does not imply dog park, so she is much quieter and calmly waits for her treat at the end. If I touch an envelope or packing tape, I am going to the post office, so that means dog park and lots of happy barking. Shrewdly, she looks out the window, to indicate how much she wants to go to the dog park. Once outside early in the morning, at 100 degrees, she is not eager to go anywhere.

If someone wants a working dog, does he want a shrewd, independent one who is more trouble but capable of solving problems? Or does he want a cute but passive lap dog?

Shrewdness is the issue in the parable. What is the approach that is admired? What is being criticized? These two are shrewd in business. The owner does not want someone so clever going over to his rivals and favoring them in a deal…again. The owner is shrewd so admires that quality.

9 And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations.

There is an interesting parallel, not obvious in the English. The previous verse calls him, literally, the steward of unrighteousness, which emphasizes his status as an unbeliever.

So the steward of unrighteousness made friends using the mammon of unrighteousness. Jesus is saying – Look at how the unbelievers are careful about their resources. The steward used his position to stay in his job. The owner had a right to fire the man in anger, but saw more to be gained in keeping him.

Therefore, if the unbelievers are wise, the believers should also be wise in the same way.

The mammon of unrighteousness is not “ill gotten gains” but simply extra wealth. But how convenient it would be to say to a Mafia member or a crooked businessman, “Now you have this mammon of unrighteousness. Make friends by building this new college chapel or library. We will put your name on it so everyone knows what a fine fellow you really are.”

Luther makes a great point of showing how the Planned Giving Counselors of his age built more institutions, more churches, while leaving the poor to starve in the streets.

The lesson ends with Jesus saying, in effect, “When money no longer matters, and you enter eternal life, the people you helped will speak up for your good works that followed faith. If mammon can be used to keep a job or build even more wealth, then mammon can also be used to help people in various ways.”

There is a great contrast out there today, which I experience daily. One on hand is the false idea that money will build the church. People pray for grants, because a foundation will answer their needs. Church bodies fling millions of dollars at projects because that will make it work. Congregations spend millions to fix up their buildings because people will attend if they look prettier. Long ago I saw Babtist figures for spending money on evangelism. Based on ad campaigns, if everyone saw the slogan, they would reach millions with their clever slogan, which was either “I found it” or another phrase.

And yet I see congregations with millions to spend, but they have to urge their members to buy chicken wings at one particular business to make more money. There is never enough.

Some people recognized long ago that a congregation relying on rummage sales, and government subsidies, and insurance goods will still be poor. It is unlike the steward, who was “ashamed to beg.” Commercialism, government programs, and “grants” for “free” ads are a message saying to everyone, “We can’t or won’t support ourselves. We need you to do God’s work for us.”

In contrast, I have seen a few people spending a few dollars to get some important works about Lutheran doctrine out in public.

The healthy (sound) doctrine of the Bible is our most precious treasure. Shrewd people value that treasure, knowing that it is not lost by being shared.

Many books are quite expensive. I saw a first edition of Twain for $40,000 but a first edition of Harry Potter was $160,000. A set of Luther’s sermons can be bought for a few dollars, a catechism for even less. I bought a few remaining catechisms from one author. The one remaining went up in price to $80. However, some people have put together scans so everyone can have (and study) the early catechisms for free.

It depends on what we value.

People say they want the best for their children, but they do not spend what matters most – their time – with their children. And they do not give them the best literature to read, the best doctrine to study, to best music to enjoy.

It is not very shrewd to waste money on expensive fads that go away when quality is long-lasting and inexpensive.


1. This parable does not teach us how one should cheat another; for Christ calls him an unrighteous steward, and numbers him among the children of this world, therefore his wisdom is praised, not his unrighteous dealings.

2. Spiritual wisdom distributes temporal possessions to those who need them, and in their place Christ welcomes the givers into the eternal tabernacle. For he himself says, Matthew 10:20: “Whosoever giveth a cup of cold water unto one of the least of these my disciples in the name of a disciple, verily I say unto you, he shall in no wise lose his reward,” an. d in the day of judgment he will say, “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.” Matthew 25:40.


I. FAITH ALONE MAKES US GOOD, AND FRIENDS OF GOD.

4. The foundation must be maintained without wavering, that faith without any works, without any merit, reconciles man to God and makes him good, as Paul says to the Romans 3:21-22: “But now apart from the law a righteousness of God hath been manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ unto all them that believe.” Paul at another place, Romans 4:9, says: “To Abraham, his faith was reckoned for righteousness;” so also with us.

Again, 5: “Being therefore justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.” Again, 10:10: “For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.” These, and many more similar passages, we must firmly hold and trust in them immovably, so that to faith alone without any assistance of works, is attributed the forgiveness of sins and our justification.

5. Take for an illustration the parable of Christ in Matthew 7:17: “Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but the corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.” Here you see that the fruit does not make the tree good, but without any fruit and before any fruit the tree must be first good, or made good, before it can bear good fruit. As he also says, Matthew 12:33-34: “Either make the tree good, and its fruit good; or make the tree corrupt, and its fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by its fruit. Ye offspring of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things?”

Thus it is the naked truth, that a man must be good without good works, and before he does any good works. And it is clear how impossible it is that a man should become good by works, when he is not good before he does the good works. For Christ stands firm when he says: “How can ye, being evil, speak good things?” And hence follows: How can ye, being evil, do good things?

6. Therefore the powerful conclusion follows, there must be something far greater and more precious than all good works, by which a man becomes pious and good, before he does good; just as he must first be in bodily health before he can labor and do hard work. This great and precious something is the noble Word of God, which offers us in the Gospel the grace of God in Christ. He who hears and believes this, thereby becomes good and righteous. Wherefore it is called the Word of life, a Word of grace, a Word of forgiveness. But he who neither hears nor believes it, can in no way become good. For St. Peter says in the Acts 15:9: “And he made no distinction between us and them, cleansing their hearts by faith.”





---


Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "The Ninth Sunday after Trinity. Luke 16:1ff. The S...":

Ichabod -

Excellent sermon! It's a type of sermon one is little likely to hear in most present day "Christian" circles. It is no small wonder when many pastors step into the pulpit, restless souls become quiet, correctly expecting just another canned sermon which lulls their consciences to slumber and their minds to pacification.

Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org

www.moralmatters.org 

Union Church Bodies: ELCA, LCMS, WELS, ELS, CLC (sic)

"ELCA is defintely a union church body, but all of them?"
Not the Church of the Augsburg Confession.


rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Pastor Bickel - "Please Explain Emergent Churches....":

Salem on the northwest side of Milwaukee was a union church. It was one of the founding congregations of the WELS. Its Reformed counterpart is still located across the street. The first pastor served both congregations.

***



GJ - ELCA has started union congregations quite deliberately, but they are proud of it and put it on the signs.

The LCMS had a whole string of congregations, like St. John in Ellisville, Missouri, as joint members with the Willow Creek Association. I listed them long ago. Some of them went stealth officially, but not doctrinally or worshipfully - where it matters most.

WELS apes the Emergent Churches all over the map, from Indianapolis to Appleton to Chicago to Round Rock and beyond. The WELS staff spent so much dough at Trinity Divinity in Deerfield that the unionistic school named WELS twice in one of their bulletins. Willow Creek is another recipient of WELS donations.

The Little Sect on the Prairie has its movie screen, not-really-Lutheran congregation. Nathan Krause was there the last time I looked.

The CLC (sic) backs the unionism of its most troubled pair, David Koenig and Paul Tiefel, while calling itself...The Church of the Lutheran Confession. Koenig and Tiefel are the ideal unionists - they love every denomination except their own.

Characteristics of a Lutheran congregation and pastor, rare today:

  • Historic liturgy.
  • Closed communion.
  • KJV or a least a version of the English Luther Bible.
  • Lutheran hymns.
  • Biblical, doctrinal sermon.
  • Historic creeds.
  • Knowledge and fidelity - Luther's works, the Book of Concord.
  • Respect for the divine call and congregational property.


Characteristics of a union congregation and church body, almost universal today:

  • No liturgy or a blended serviced aimed at no liturgy in the future.
  • Open communion - or "Don't ask, don't tell" communion.
  • NIV, NNIV, or worse.
  • Pop songs shown on a movie screen.
  • Fill-in-the blanks bulletins, so the vapid message is remembered better.
  • A message or pep talk instead of a sermon, often plagiarized from a false teacher.
  • Training at Fuller, Willow Creek, Granger, Trinity Deerfield, Mars Hill, etc.
  • Protection and promotion for false teachers.
  • Persecution of faithful congregations and pastors.
  • Dependency on Thrivent, foundations, and commercialism to keep afloat.
  • Works with various denominations, but despises Luther and the Book of Concord.
  • No respect for the call, constant meddling, dishonest seizure of congregational property.

Except for the stuff they hide from the innocent:
kidnapping, robbery, adultery, and pledging fidelity to a syphilitic bishop.



Saturday, August 4, 2012

Amazon.com: The Harmony of the Four Evangelists (9781468135565): Martin Chemnitz, Polycarp Leyser, John Gerhard, Dr. Richard J. Dinda: Books

The Harmony of the Four Evangelists

Amazon.com: The Harmony of the Four Evangelists (9781468135565): Martin Chemnitz, Polycarp Leyser, John Gerhard, Dr. Richard J. Dinda: Books:


The Harmony of the Four Evangelists, volume 1[Paperback]

Martin Chemnitz (Author), Polycarp Leyser (Author), John Gerhard (Author),Richard J. Dinda (Translator)

Price:$19.95 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Want it delivered Tuesday, August 7? Order it in the next 46 hours and 30 minutes, and choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details 


'via Blog this'

***

GJ - Several volumes of The Harmony of the Four Evangelists are now in print in English. Three of the great Lutheran orthodox theologians participated in this work of genius:

  • Martin Chemnitz - the senior editor of the Book of Concord.
  • Polycarp Leyser - who rebuked the UOJ of Samuel Huber. He was also an editor of the BoC. Early in his career he was considered an expert in justification by faith.
  • John Gerhard - (not to be confused with the hymn writer Paul Gerhardt). He was a prolific author.

Pastor Bickel - "Please Explain Emergent Churches."
WELS, LCMS, and ELS Promote Them, Fund Them, Protect Them

Al Sorum is one of the Church  Growth plants at The Sausage Factory.
Emergent Churches are those where all confessional tags are avoided at all costs. The WELS emergents avoid "Lutheran" and "WELS" but it can sometimes be found in the small print.

Emergent characteristics are:
No liturgy.
No sacraments.
No pipe organ.
No hymns.
No sermons.
No creeds.
Jon Buchholz on CrossWalk - "No problem!"
The clergy dress like they are going to mow the hay or change the oil.
They advocate and practice women's ordination.
They have movies screens for their anything goes song lyrics.

The Lutherans often copy the sermons of their emergent heroes, like Groeschel.
They train with gay activist Stanley, cussing Calvinist Driscoll, space cadet Sweet, Babtist Stetzer, Beeson at Granger, Hyles at Willow Creek, the divinity school at Trinity Deerfield, and various morons at Fuller Seminary. WELS pastors like Rich Krause, John Parlow, Paul Kelm, Steve Witte, Larry Olson have DMins from various false teaching schools. But of course, Mequon itself is a Fuller clone now. They just do not grant drive-by DMins.

WELS has emergent churches all over - The CORE, Doebler's Rock and Roll Church, the Chicago one (where the pastor just loved Leonard Sweet).

The ELS has one too.

Missouri is loaded with them, and ELCA tries its hand claw at them as well.

Missouri and WELS congregations have actually joined the Willow Creek Association, returning them to the good old days of the Pietistic union churches. St. Paul in Germantown (Columbus, Ohio) was a union church for Lutherans and Reformed. So was historic St. John in Milwaukee, if memory serves me.

ELCA went back to union churches, after separating them for a time. WELS, Missouri, and the ELS are up to date with ELCA because they all work together, plan together, and prostitute themselves for Thrivent grants together.

Not a Photoshop - Mark Driscoll is the cussing pastor.
Dressing silly seems to be a requirement.
Face mikes - so cool.
Craig Groeschel is a Methodist EC emergent leader.
Two others are Ed Stetzer, Babtist; Leonard Sweet - New Age.
WELS adores all three false teachers.

Left to right: Parlow, Jeske, Kelm, and Patterson work together against Lutheran doctrine,
so they get the synod and Thrivent loot.


Andy Stanley is a closeted Babtist.
His church does not admit to be Babtist, but they dedicated babies instead of baptizing them.
WELS workers like Ski, Glende, Buske, Parlow worship with Stanley - and love it.
Gretchen earned a regal salary at Doebler's emergent mission in Round Rock.
Doebler famously prayed for a $200,000 grant to hire a worship leader.
In the old days, that was called a pastor.
Dr. Moo wants you to buy the NNIV, ideal for Emergent Churches.


Adulterous Pastor Jack Schaap Praised Emergent Churches


Someone commented on another Schaap video:

Few knew him as well as did I. Yes, he is a perverted, philandering, vulgar deviant unfit for the pulpit, but what does that say for the bought-and-paid-for, spineless clowns behind him who didn't stand up to Hyles for 30 years, or Schaap for 11 years? This church needs to be turned into a shopping mall.

The ministers who get featured have a lot in common, no matter what their denomination is. The fact is they belong to the Synagogue of Satan, like P-Boy, the consultant to Parlow, thanks to a Thrivent grant.

Study Jack Schaap for Clues on the Decline of WELS, Missouri, and the Little Sect on the Prairie

Her father was Jack Hyles,
also a womanizer.


Jack Schaap was fired for having an affair with a teen-aged girl. He is the son-in-law of Jack Hyles, who was known for having multiple partners. Hyles' fundy sons, also ministers, had the same reputation.

Hyles had buttons made that said "100% Jack Hyles." He never lost his job for his many improprieties.

Apparently the huge congregation by-passed the randy sons of Jack Hyles, choosing Jack Schaap instead. Since Jack married Hyles' daughter, they were still keeping the church in the family. That is why insider deals should be avoided. Large independent congregations rely on chips off the old block, but that often disappoints everyone, as the Schuller clan has proven.

Schaap is hard to quantify at the moment. Very little is on the Net. However, his shift from the KJV, after promising the opposite, is an indication. Another one is the growing clan of Emergent Church fans that he built up in the congregation. He began advocating Emergent Church behavior before his downfall.

Schaap's initial pledge about the KJV must have been dishonest. Another explanation is that time spent at Fuller Seminary changed his mind. Like the WELS and Missouri leaders, he felt it necessary to cloak his unionism.

The ministers who gush over Church Growth or Emergent Church are always Fuller Seminary victims. So many imitations of Fuller are out there now, that it is possible to become converted away from the Pasadena re-education camp. However, it is not likely. Look for outraged articles to appear later, articles about Schaap that detail his furtive study at those dens of iniquity. Those articles will come from disappointed Fundies who were already outraged by Schaap's weird sexual-Christological theories and his abandonment of the KJV.

Schaap's former church will not admit to additional teen victims. In fact, they are in full cover-up mode already. They have hired a powerful attorney (sound like WELS?) to gather stories from other girls, so they can avoid messy arrests and criminal trials, not to mention multi-million dollar settlements.

Jack Hyles is famous for having the largest Sunday School
and a harem.

Message to Joel Lillo:
A Faithful Remnant Will Teach the Gospel.
Not Personal - But the Truth of the Word


Febreze has left a new comment on your post "Kilcreased Blogs":

Joel, this blog has woken up many faithful Lutheran pastors and laymen. I hope that this blog wouldn't ever go down. It's the lighthouse during a storm. Enjoy your Pietism and universalism, while we'll enjoy the BoC and actually uphold it instead of being a hypocrite.

***



GJ - One dead certain give-away of a flimsy argument is the personal element. Sometimes it is expressed as "My pastor does not agree with you."

Even weaker is this gambit - "You are a bad person. You belonged to various synods. You did not go to our schools. You make people angry. Therefore, you are wrong."

My argumentation and my resume are irrelevant. There is no end to the chaos if people must stake their claims on either one. In fact, that is why so many shallow arguments start with Holy Mother Synod and continue with the Immaculate Conception of someone like CFW Walther. Since few MDivs do any serious study beyond seminary, most cling to the adolescent certainty that their professors must have been right about everything.

Mequon students bind their yellowed dogmatics notes. Their papers are supposed to regurgitate the regurgitations of seminary class. Anything else is dangerous.

Given this cob-webbed scenario, a doctrinal version of Miss Havisham's dreary home, no one should be shocked that pastors defend error by saying, "We actually agree," or "They are just talking past each other."

Ever since the Great Kidnapper landed in New Orleans and signed his oath of obedience to Bishop Stephan, the SynConference has waged war against justification by faith. That is the only justification taught by the Scriptures, the Confessions, and the post-Concord Lutheran Orthodox fathers.

With Wayne Mueller having disposed of the Book of Concord altogether, the Wisconsin Sect now aims to impose universal absolution on God by adopting Murdoch's NNIV, a fictional work so bad that Southern Babtists asked their book stores to avoid stocking the travesty. But WELS wants to make it their main Bible, with nihil obstat on the inside cover, signed by Pope Schroeder.

UOJ just drips from this article of the Augsburg Confession!
The UOJ arguments prove how dull, blinded, and hardened the SynConference leaders are.
---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Message to Joel Lillo: A Faithful Remnant Will Tea...":

Ichabod -

Thank you that you have shown, demonstrated and illustrated with your website some stark differences.

I've always thought that synodical (denominational) affiliation; coupled with (their) perspective church pension systems, pathetically end up being the worldly blood that is thicker than the Gospel water. [1 Peter 5:2-4 ; Titus 1:11 ; Matthew 23:14 ; Isaiah 56:10-11 ; John 15:1-3]

We are told by Scripture that Disciples of Christ are besieged by and affected by the spiritual battle which is waged in "high places." [Ephesians 6:10-18] Hence, it is of paramount importance, to be highly aware of one's spiritual enemies.

Who are a Christian's enemies? Obviously, many unbelievers, as that is expected, as they are outside the pale of Christianity [the church]. But, those within the church are very deadly because they foment and promulgate doctrines of devils, thereby leading souls, astray. [1 Timothy 4:1-2 ; 2 Timothy 3:1-5]

Nathan M. Bickel

http://www.thechristianmessage.org/

http://moralmatters.org/

***

GJ - When people run from their own confession of faith, they are either playing a game of deception or one of concealment.

The UOJ fanatics always cloak themselves with justification by faith, but they mean "faith in world absolution without faith." That has never been justification by faith.

There are many who believe in the Biblical doctrine of justification by faith, but they will not stand up for it, so they really do not believe it at all. If they did, they would confess the truth in the open. But some will object, "I would, but the synod would punish me." How can they believe in the power of the Gospel to erase their sins, the most powerful weapon of all, and yet fear the synod officials and their toadies? That means they really do not believe in the efficacy of the Word, the mercy of God, or His goodness.

God must be terribly weak or blind, to be weaker than the cowardly bullies of synod headquarters, to never see the needs of the faithful. I am going to erase Psalm 37:25 from my Bible, since it no longer applies.

KJV Psalm 37:25 I have been young, and now am old; yet have I not seen the righteous [justified by faith in Christ] forsaken, nor his seed begging bread.


Friday, August 3, 2012

Kilcreased Blogs.
Two UOJ Blogs Are Gone



The Appleton blog:

http://ichabodthegloryisdeparted.blogspot.com/

Blog has been removed

Sorry, the blog at ichabodthegloryisdeparted.blogspot.com has been removed. This address is not available for new blogs.
Did you expect to see your blog here? See: 'I can't find my blog on the Web, where is it?'
---





No posts.

---



Febreze has left a new comment on your post "Kilcreased Blogs":

Joel, this blog has woken up many faithful Lutheran pastors and laymen. I hope that this blog wouldn't ever go down. It's the lighthouse during a storm. Enjoy your Pietism and universalism, while we'll enjoy the BoC and actually uphold it instead of being a hypocrite.

***

GJ - Joel says he agrees with the Augsburg Confession, so why does he want this blog to die? How many blogs have copied most of the Book of Concord? One (1) - Ichabod.

---


LPC has left a new comment on your post "Kilcreased Blogs. Two UOJ Blogs Are Gone":

The same way the Huberites were driven by orthodox Lutherans, these UOJ blogs need to die as well.

UOJ is wrong and contrary to Scripture and the Confessions, UOJ bloggers deleting their blogs is the first step to their recovery.

LPC

---
Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Kilcreased Blogs. Two UOJ Blogs Are Gone":



---

Pastor Nathan Bickel

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Kilcreased Blogs. Two UOJ Blogs Are Gone":

Ichabod -

May I present a couple of plausible theories why the fake Ichabod has apparently closed down? You must know me by now that I seldom deny anyone my opinion:

1) Perhaps, fake ichabod was only showing 10 pageviews every two days and the author felt it wasn't his worthwhile anymore to plagairize your web name. Perhaps, he became guilt stricken that he was protesting too much while having to mimic your website's name in order to gain those 5 pageviews per day when some people did their online searches for the real Ichabod site.

2) Perhaps, fake ichabod somehow impressed some Lutheran district and synodical leaders that the author was offered some favor and or a position. Perhaps, fake ichabod was ordered to cease because it reminded synodical bureacracy of the real Ichabod. Perhaps, the rest of the anonymous fake ichabod commenting crew will be harnessed for some new website endeavor, such as extolling the latest church growth fashions and the latest cultural fades. After all, there are so many empty church pews to fill for all those Universalist back door loses......

Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org

www.moralmatters.org

***

GJ - You have a point, Pastor Bickel. No one wants to show page-views. I have them out, with the most popular posts for the week, month, and all-time since June of 2010.

There is no doubt that the Appleton blog was simply fueling what I do. After all, I went there for inspiration and found it as barren as Fox Valley's doctrine. The dog in the manger is keeping the URL. If he cannot use it, no one else can. His other blog is the same way, so some gay blogger renamed it Anonymous E. Clever? I called Tim "Anonymouse" and he callled his really vicious, crude, scatological blog Anonymouse. He even signed his comments that way, until I pinned down his location and identified him (and Joel Lillo, his partner in crime).

Like most bullies, they act all fem and passive when confronted one-on-one. They are only tough when they have a ten-to-one advantage or anonymity.

The Arizona land steal should continue to heat up. WELS does not want its predatory nature out in the open.

---



Pastor Joel Lillo, WELS, Fox Valley, Anything Goes District has left a new comment on your post "Kilcreased Blogs. Two UOJ Blogs Are Gone":

Oh my goodness, where else COULD someone POSSIBLY find the Book of Concord online? It's so incredibly hard to find! Well,maybe someone might possibly find it if they went here: http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=book+of+concord&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

As far as UOJ is concerned: I don't think there is an appreciable difference between what you believe (universal atonement) and the official teaching of (W)ELS (to use Brett Meyer's patented abbreviation). Let me repeat this (and I'll put it in all caps so that Greg's sycophants can know I'm emphasizing this): THERE IS NO ONE IN (W)ELS WHO TEACHES UNIVERSALISM. WE SAY THAT GOD CONSIDERS ALL SINS COMPLETELY PAID FOR BECAUSE OF JESUS' PERFECT LIFE AND INNOCENT DEATH, BUT THAT NO ONE RECEIVES THE BENEFIT OF THAT UNLESS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO FAITH THROUGH THE MEANS OF GRACE.

I think I'm done here.

***

GJ - Joel, you are a poster boy for obdurate ignorance of doctrine.

---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Kilcreased Blogs. Two UOJ Blogs Are Gone":

Ichabod -

Believing Rev. Joel Lillo's claim that WELS doesn't promulgate universal objective justification is like forcing oneself to believe that Obama is a disciple of Christ:

http://moralmatters.org/2012/04/26/obama-not-christian-no-more-than-the-man-in-the-moon-13/

http://moralmatters.org/2012/05/10/obama-proves-again-he-is-not-a-christian-4/

Furthermore, Lillo is blowing hot air. I've documented the universalism in my WELS neck of the woods:

"Pastor Nathan Bickel on UOJ in WELS. Aaron Frey Still Preaching in WELS. How Far Will He Go?"

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2012/07/pastor-nathan-bickel-on-uoj-in-wels.html

Finally, denying something, does not make it go away. Has Pastor Lillo not paid attention to what Ichabod has been exposing? But, then again, that's the denial factor at work [with him].

Nathan M. Bickel

http://www.thechristianmessage.org/

http://moralmatters.org/

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Kilcreased Blogs. Two UOJ Blogs Are Gone":

(W)ELS Pastor Joel Lillo states, "THERE IS NO ONE IN (W)ELS WHO TEACHES UNIVERSALISM. WE SAY THAT GOD CONSIDERS ALL SINS COMPLETELY PAID FOR BECAUSE OF JESUS' PERFECT LIFE AND INNOCENT DEATH, BUT THAT NO ONE RECEIVES THE BENEFIT OF THAT UNLESS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO FAITH THROUGH THE MEANS OF GRACE."

This is not true.

"Then of course there is our life's calling as proclaimers of God's own message. How can the lonely, the depressed, the grieving, the suffering and the insecure be pulled from the pits of their bad feelings unless they hear the objective reality of God's love apart from their feelings; unless they hear no condition attached to the universal salvation Christ procured for them as individuals?"

"What does frightened little Suzy need to hear when she comes to you and says, "Teacher, my Baptist friend told me I'm going to burn in hell if I don't hurry up and ask Jesus into my heart"? What a time to apply the objective reality of Jesus' love for Suzy! What a time to apply Christ's universal salvation to this trembling little lamb!"

"Whether it be a personal conversation with our landlord, neighbor or friend, or whether it be a more "professional" conversation with the unchurched parent of a pupil or with the new prospect discovered by the evangelism committee, we know for certain the message we have for them. In our minds there's no Reformed reflection on whether or not this person really is one of God's elect. There's no Arminian condition attached to the forgiveness we hold out to them. The only message that will bring them to faith, strengthen them in their faith and motivate them to want to hear the Word is our simplified version of universal and objective justification."
Page 9
David J. Beckman
Universal and Objective Justification with Special Emphasis on a Recent Controversy
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/BeckmanUniversal.PDF

---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "Kilcreased Blogs. Two UOJ Blogs Are Gone":

Joel could have done a real good job if he followed the rule for minister's scholarship, which is to quote the sources.

Are these CAP lettered words from the WELS official documents? Nope. The words were his interpretation or his own spin of what the official documents state.

So Brett was spot on to replay back for the whole Internet world to see what their synodic leaders really teach and confess.

LPC

---

There is always LaughQuest.


Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Kilcreased Blogs. Two UOJ Blogs Are Gone":

It is no time to rejoice over a couple of websites, apparently closing down. I was reminded of the Scripture:

"Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth: Lest the LORD see it, and it displease him, and he turn away his wrath from him. Fret not thyself because of evil men, neither be thou envious at the wicked; for there shall be no reward to the evil man; the candle of the wicked shall be put out. [Proverbs 24:17-20]

Furthermore, who are a Christian's enemies? Obviously, many unbelievers, as that is expected, as they are outside the pale of Christianity [the church]. But, those within the church are very deadly because they foment and promulgate doctrines of devils, thereby leading souls, astray. [1 Timothy 4:1-2 ; 2 Timothy 3:1-5]

Finally, regarding many Christian pastors' allegiances:

I've always thought that synodical (denominational) affiliation; coupled with (their) perspective church pension systems, pathetically end up being the worldly blood that is thicker than the Gospel water. [1 Peter 5:2-4 ; Titus 1:11 ; Matthew 23:14 ; Isaiah 56:10-11 ; John 15:1-3]

Nathan M. Bickel

http://www.thechristianmessage.org/

http://moralmatters.org/

WELS-LCMS Evangelism: A Parable




250 in attendance (local WELS members) - 3 years ago.
Now - 250 in attendance. 

Why Do the Synodical Conference Sects Wage War Against Faith?



KJV Luke 18:7 And shall not God avenge His own elect, which cry day and night unto him, though He bear long with them? 8 I tell you that He will avenge them speedily. Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall He find faith on the earth?

This parable leading up to this climactic statement is not often discussed. Here it is.

KJV Luke 18:1 And he spake a parable unto them to this end, that men ought always to pray, and not to faint; 2 Saying, There was in a city a judge, which feared not God, neither regarded man: 3 And there was a widow in that city; and she came unto him, saying, Avenge me of mine adversary. 4 And he would not for a while: but afterward he said within himself, Though I fear not God, nor regard man; 5 Yet because this widow troubleth me, I will avenge her, lest by her continual coming she weary me. 6 And the Lord said, Hear what the unjust judge saith.

This is an example of the Jewish argument, from the lesser to the greater. The judge is evil and never stops being evil. He does not care about man's laws or God's, a fact stressed twice for emphasis. But because the widow is never going to stop asking for justice, he acts on her behalf.

The judge is not God - but the opposite of God. Jesus' theme is clear - If an evil judge will concede due to persistence, how much more will our gracious and merciful Father respond to persistent prayers?

This second ending, a warning that accompanies the Gospel Promise, concludes the section -


But will the Son of Man find faith when He returns in judgment?


I cannot find a single passage where Jesus rails against faith in Him. Perhaps some Fuller graduates could cite them for me. They like to say the "justification of sinners" but do not disclose that they mean - the justification of all unbelievers.



Faith is constantly taught in the Bible, because the term means trust - not virtue or making a decision. The object of this trust is the Word of God, because the Holy Spirit conveys Christ to us in the Word.

No one has Christ or the benefits of Christ without this trust in the Word. How can someone be forgiven, righteous, and saved without even having a knowledge of Christ? Nevertheless, the rascals running the SynConference seminaries will protect that notion until Schwan gives them a grant to teach otherwise.

Since the prevailing theme of the SynConference is not faith, it must be fear. As Luther taught, fear is the opposite of faith.

Everyone has fears. Some of them are good and healthy, such as being afraid of sparking high-power lines or  driving while distracted.

Other fears are exaggerated and childish, such as imagining dragons in a darkened room, so mom sprays water into it to chase them away. Various mothers tell me this works wonders. My mother turned the light on.

A similar childish fear is the fear of synod officials. Yes, synod officials are vicious, vindictive, spiteful, and shamelessly self-centered. But they are cowards, every last one of them. They wave around their little weapon and the crowd falls back in terror. That same crowd could rush one of them and offer a tar-and-feather exit.

Faith Lutheran Church in Moline, Illinois stood up to one synodical bully. They said to the ELCA bishop, "If you or your representatives show up on our property, the Moline Police will arrest you." ELCA raged and threatened, citing the Eighth Commandment. The congregation left ELCA and joined the Augustana District of the LCMC.

The Pietists are all works-salesmen. They fret about this big question - What should I do? There is a system to supply about 10,000 rules for a good-conduct medal in Pietism.

The first one is:
Never question Holy Mother Synod.


The second is like unto the first:
Check with Holy Mother Synod about all the other rules.

One rule, being enforced with rigor, is - Never read Ichabod, quote Ichabod, or cite Ichabod. The leaders can break that rule because they enforce that rule. Therefore, when someone complains to me about something on the blog, I tell them, "You should not be reading it in the first place!"

Believe it or not, SP Mark Schroeder has time to contact anyone who breaks this No Ichabod rule. What was going on at The Love Shack during his Investigative Judgment? Answer - one pastor was running off with $300,000 in synodical offerings. Another was committing heinous felonies against children. Church and Change was growing Exponentially, with the help of rewards and promotions from SP Schroeder.

Party in the MLC? Helpless. Plagiarism of Groeschel? Helpless. WELS GLBTQ and Allies on Facebook? Helpless.

The real question is - What do I believe? Where do I put my trust?

The corollary is plain. Am I afraid of God or man?

Or - what do I leave behind?

Luther and his co-workers left behind a enormous body of work, defending and articulating God's Word. When I quote Luther, synodocats hiss and howl. Melanchthon, Chemnitz, and Gerhard are unknowns to them.

Faith receives what God freely offers. The opposite is a rejection of what God teaches and offers. To stay in favor with the synodical popes, one must constantly deny and reject the Word of God, share in the deception, and rake in the monetary benefits. The synodocats want pastors and congregations dependent on them. But they also toss out the useful idiots who serve them night and day.

The synods, congregations, and political groups ( like Church and Change) are far too generous in publicizing their crafts and assaults. "By their fruits ye shall know them."

Roman Catholic Archbishop R. Weakland embezzled from his church
to pay blackmail to his male love.
No wonder Wisconsin Lutheran College featured and publicized him as their speaker.


Their published dogma is either copied from the Enthusiasts of Fuller or the Enthusiasts of Rome. The gushing references to the Roman Catholic Church are accompanied by their public appearances and speeches at Lutheran institutions.

Instead of repentance, the synods respond about their Fuller and Roman apostasy with denial, then self-justification.

Neuhaus criticized me in one of his publications, for  my remarks
about his lunch with His Holiness, the Antichrist.


Father Richard John Neuhaus was an Evangelical Catholic until he became Catholic, then a priest honored by the Antichrist, then dead.

Although I am healthier than the legal defense funds of most synods, I have a lot more history than future. I simply want people to study the Confessions, Luther, Chemnitz, and their own histories. The foundation is Biblical studies.

As Warren Malach wrote earlier, it is not Christian doctrine unless taught clearly in the Scriptures. I would rather retire in a hut than earn a princely salary--with benefits--for teaching error and defending corruption.

Some indications of unbelief caused by UOJ are:

  1. Pastors do not visit their own sick and shut-ins, but that is no obstacle for a call or a position on the Synodical Conference.
  2. Evangelism is all talk, acting busy or conjuring visions.
  3. Valid, thoughtful criticism is rebuked with slander, such as WELS calling Corky K. "brain-damaged" because he criticized Church Growth. He was dying in the hospital when they said that.
  4. Pastors do not write their own sermons or meditations, but that is defended by the leaders by "many are doing the same thing."
  5. The only discipline is persecution of faithful pastors and laity.
  6. The adulterous, corrupt, and incorrigibles are rewarded and promoted.
  7. Congregations and denominations are admired for wealth and size, not for fidelity to the Word.
  8. Catechism is short-changed, because pastors are too lazy to teach it.
  9. Schools are replaced with state-licensed day-care businesses, so congregations subsidize an extra job for the pastor's wife and her friends instead of offering the Word of God to its children.
  10. ELCA is the secret partner, through Thrivent, calling all the shots for each joint religious project. Shh, do not tell or you will not be invited to the next gathering at a luxury spa.


---

The Holy Spirit is absent in UOJ, too.
See below.


Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Why Do the Synodical Conference Sects Wage War Aga...":

Ichabod - Nice article!

You correctly say:

"Faith is constantly taught in the Bible, because the term means trust - not virtue or making a decision. The object of this trust is the Word of God, because the Holy Spirit conveys Christ to us in the Word........Since the prevailing theme of the SynConference is not faith, it must be fear. As Luther taught, fear is the opposite of faith.

I find:

The universal objective justification enthusiasts misunderstand, and / or totally gloss over this (what you say). Their fear and apparent paranoia of faith being a work, precludes [blinds] them from correctly understanding genuine faith. Hence, their (ungodly) fear; and they are driven further to molest the work of the Holy Spirit (who creates, maintains and completes personal faith in the individual soul).

These UOJ fanatics are blind to their preoccupation and over emphasis of Christ's Atonement work, at the expense of the work of the Holy Spirit; personal faith and belief. A good example of this is LCMS professor Dr. David Scaer's book, "Christology." In his last chapter, "The Ascension and Second Coming of Christ," Universalist, Scaer, mentions nothing of the Holy Spirit and His work - totally dissing the 3rd Person of the Trinity! Unbelievable! Yet, quite predictable! What a shame! What a perversion of ignoring what the Lord has lain out in Scripture! To totally dismiss what happens between Christ's Ascension and His Second Coming denies a major portion of the Gospel! Does Dr. Scaer have the ungodly practice as Thomas Jefferson, blacking out portions of Scripture with which he disagrees? Did Professor Scaer rip out the Gospel of John's Scripture, chapters of 14, 15 and 16?

But, returning to a major theme in your article, - that being the fear factor, exhibited by the universalism enthusiasts:

The Scripture says in the 2nd Epistle of Timothy, that God does not grant a spirit of fear but of a sound mind. When is the last time you ever had an intelligent conversation with a Universalist?

2 Timothy 1:7 - For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.

2 Timothy 1:13 - Hold fast the form of sound words, which thou hast heard of me, in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.

2 Timothy 3:8 - Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith.

Nathan M. Bickel

http://www.thechristianmessage.org/

http://moralmatters.org/