Monday, September 3, 2012

Thomas Cole's Landscape with Ruined Tower Illustrates Lutherdom Today


solafide (http://solafide.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "UOJ in Christian Hymnody - Not":

Verse 5 of If God Himself Be For Me is pretty clear. Specifically, "He is the Lord who cleanses my soul from sin through faith."

There is a reason why you won't find UOJ in Lutheran hymns, that's because it is FALSE DOCTRINE. Luther and the others were EXTREMELY clear, because scripture is CRYSTAL CLEAR that justification is by faith alone. If someone who doesn't know Greek can get it and explain it to his Methobapticostal family members, there are no reasons other than persistent error/teaching false doctrine or plain ineptitude to not get it. I don't know which it is, it may be both. However, I do know that Lutheran pastors need to stop taking their "superior's" word as Gospel and start questioning what they were told. Did Luther roll over when Papist after Papist demanded him to recant and tow the party line? No. Thank God he didn't, he did his own research and study into the matter. So why should we be any different?

---


***

GJ - WELS, Missouri, ELCA, and the ELS are teaching Rambach's Halle Pietism, merging the atonement and justification. Their Gospel is false because the faith they teach is faith in UOJ dogma.


Some Graphics from Galatians 2 - Luther's Commentary



This is not a mistake, to repeat the same quotation found above.
Rambach represents the exegesis of UOJ - a false dogma claiming to be the Gospel.
Jay Webber, Jon Buchholz, and Steve Spencer favor the Halle Pietist.




Organ Concert at Historic St. John Lutheran Church.
Milwaukee

M

Lutheran Hymns and UOJ



quercuscontramalum (http://quercuscontramalum.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Extra Nos: UOJers are Huberites, their denials are...":

If —IF— the universal justification of all sinners even without Faith, Word, or Sacrament is such a marvelous and uniquely 'Lutheran' teaching, where does it appear the historic Lutheran hymnody? Surely something as 'incredible' as UOJ would have been magnified in hymns by Gerhardt even if it escaped Luther's attention.


UOJ in Lutheran Hymns - Not in My Hymnal


quercuscontramalum (http://quercuscontramalum.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Extra Nos: UOJers are Huberites, their denials are...":

If —IF— the universal justification of all sinners even without Faith, Word, or Sacrament is such a marvelous and uniquely 'Lutheran' teaching, where does it appear the historic Lutheran hymnody? Surely something as 'incredible' as UOJ would have been magnified in hymns by Gerhardt even if it escaped Luther's attention.




UOJ in Luther's Hymns - Not



quercuscontramalum (http://quercuscontramalum.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Extra Nos: UOJers are Huberites, their denials are...":

If —IF— the universal justification of all sinners even without Faith, Word, or Sacrament is such a marvelous and uniquely 'Lutheran' teaching, where does it appear the historic Lutheran hymnody? Surely something as 'incredible' as UOJ would have been magnified in hymns by Gerhardt even if it escaped Luther's attention.



UOJ in Christian Hymnody - Not



quercuscontramalum (http://quercuscontramalum.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Extra Nos: UOJers are Huberites, their denials are...":

If —IF— the universal justification of all sinners even without Faith, Word, or Sacrament is such a marvelous and uniquely 'Lutheran' teaching, where does it appear the historic Lutheran hymnody? Surely something as 'incredible' as UOJ would have been magnified in hymns by Gerhardt even if it escaped Luther's attention.






Why the Orthodox Welcome Discussion and the False Teachers Fear Debate


Pope Paul the Plagiarist broken-heartedly confessed he did not want justification by faith discussed on Steadfast Lutherans.

McCain's remedy was to post a thirty year-old essay from Robert Preus. No surprise - the key quote comes from a Concordia Seminary St. Louis professor who turned Roman Catholic: Eduard Preuss. This quote states we are forgiven even before we are born. That is an important dogma to consider, because it has become a slogan in WELS. "I was saved 2,000 years ago."

I copied some of my graphics for the Apology of the Ausburg Confession. These brilliant, clear statements about justification by faith came from open debate. The Imperial Diet was called in 1530 to settle differences between the Lutherans and the Roman Catholics. When the Lutherans presented the Augsburg Confession, largely the work of Melanchthon, the Romanists responded with their Confutation.

The Lutherans immediately responded with their Apology or Defense of the Augsburg Confession. The Apology expanded upon justification by faith. Significantly, the editors of the Book of Concord quoted Luther as saying he was a "theologian of the Augsburg Confession." They wrote this in agreement with Luther.

The UOJ Stormtroopers are terrified of discussion because their minions are asking pointed questions about the anti-Christian, unBiblical nature of their dogma. Knapp's double-justification became Tholuck's single justification. Both taught at Halle University, where Pietism morphed into rationalism. The single justification of Tholuch and Schleiermacher is Universalism. Everyone is forgiven.

The spirit of Fuller Church Growthism and mainline unionism is the same - Universalism. The good news, the message of grace is simple - God is so kind that He does not care whether anyone believes His Word or not, whether they repent or not, whether they trust in Christ as their Savior...or not. God's grace is manifested in His forgiveness of the entire world, without that nasty contingency of faith. The more people examine the rot of Universal Objective Justification, the worse it looks.

I am pleased that UOJ Stormtroopers must come out of the closet and defend their dogma in public. Their rage is being expressed all over Lutherdom. Most Lutherans do not realize that there is an organized concerted effort to pound any outlet or anyone suspected of allowing justification by faith to be expressed.

Trinity Lutheran Church, LCMS, Bridgeton, Missouri (St. Louis) told Christian News that no money would be given to Herman Otten if he published anything by me. Otten told me that himself. I consider that to be an honor. Otten buckled and refused to publish anything positive about Thy Strong Word. The one person who did review it, negatively, is now one of those papal LCMS pastors.

Steadfast Lutherans is UOJ, with some of the dumbest statements ever to see the light of day, but it is also allowing  justification by faith comments. UOJ people want to have the Means of Grace writers banished and silenced forever. The value of the debate is that it brings out the shallow and nasty side of UOJ, which they would rather suppress.

Pastor Steve Spencer, WELS, told me that his sect ripped him for several days when the Intrepid Lutherans posted a slightly critical post. WELS (doubtless SP Schroeder) told them to remove an offensive essay, which mentioned justification by faith. Imagine Intrepid Lutherans being so far off base that they offered any support to the Chief Article of the Christian Faith! The board voted to keep the essay posted.

The UOJ Enthusiasts will lose by winning. The more they try to replace the Chief Article, justification by faith, with their dogma, justification without faith, the more people will study the Word and the Confessions.

WELS Sausage Factory CEO Paul Wendland, salesman for the NNIV, will present a streaming video Bible study on...justification by faith. That is the topic, just to remind people that they will stoop to any deception to present justification without faith.

Anyone who objects to Wendland's propaganda will be met with this barrage:

  • Are you calling the president of our seminary a false teacher?
  • Do you realize the Doctrinal Pussycats have endorsed this?
  • Do you read Ichabod? We pushed him out for objecting to clergy adultery and Church Growth!
  • Do you want all your friends and relatives to shun you for life?

Disagreeing with Wendland will mean automatic excommunication, unless the individual repents and begs forgiveness (an irony, to be sure). They do not mind anyone objecting, as long as they can crush that person and have him come back as a UOJ zombie.

For those who recognize the efficacy of the Word, the exclusive work of the Holy Spirit through the Word, reviewing the Confessions is exciting, fulfilling, and comforting.

Anything I can do to take away carnal security is part of my job as a pastor.













Sunday, September 2, 2012

Extra Nos: UOJers are Huberites, their denials are futile

Extra Nos: UOJers are Huberites, their denials are futile:


UOJers are Huberites, their denials are futile

In the book Theses Opposed to Huberism, by Dr. Aegidus Hunnius, translated by Rev. Paul A. Rydecki from the Latin, here is what the translator says about Dr. Samuel Huber, the Reformed/Calvinist turned Lutheran who ended up being dismissed by well known orthodox Lutherans of his day,...

Rev. Rydecki writes in the preface:

Most  notably,  reacting to  Calvinism's  double predestina tion, Huber began to teach that God had elected all men in eternity to salvation  ("universal  election"), and  that  God had  not only redeemed the entire human race through the substitutionary death of Christ  (which  the  Lutheran theologians also  taught), but  that God, for the sake  of the merits of Christ,  had also  justified  the entire  human race,  apart from  faith  ("universal  justification").   In spite  of his teachings of universal election and  justification,  Huber appears never to have reached the conclusion of modern  Universalism  that the entire  human  race will eventually be received into eternal  life.  He continued  to insist  that  faith was essential for obtaining eternal salvation and that a person who rejected the Gospel would thereby forfeit the justification already pronounced upon the human race.

When  Huber's  novel terminology  and  doctrine  were  re jected by the faculty atWittenberg,  Huber then  began to accuse his colleagues, especially Leyser andHunnius, of Calvinism. When no reconciliation  could be achieved even after theintervention of foreign theologians,  Huber was dismissed  from his professorship atWittenberg and banished  from the country in 1595.   Nevertheless, his polemicalwritings and public accusations against the fac­ ulty at Wittenberg continued  forseveral  years, prompting  inter­ mittent  responses by both Leyser and Hunnius 



Observe the UOJer's position:
a.) They deny they are universalist, just like Huber.
b.) They affirm that the human race have been justified universally, apart from faith, just like Huber. See their synodical statements, you will find they teach in effect that God has declared the world already righteous in Christ. Just ask them if man by virtue of Romans 4:25 (their favorite mishandled verse) have been declared righteous already, apart from faith.
c.) When confronted of making faith of no consequence, they deny that too, and like Huber insist on faith, and its lack forfeit the one stated in b.)

Observe further, UOJers call pejoratively their critics as Calvinists, just like Huber!  Observe too how UOJers insists on UOJ/OJ/SJ terminology! Even Robert Preus, prior to his Justification and Rome book insisted on these categories and terms too! You can read their blabbering on this terminology - just wander of at Steadfast Lutheran (Waltherian) blog.

Now ask yourself the question, if Huber (and  by extension UOjers)  was correct on justification, why did the signers and editors of the Book of Concord banish him from their company?

Of course, when you tell UOJers they are Huberites they find this truth hard to swallow and so they deny they are. They play blind. 

Isn't there truth in the saying, if something walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and swims like a duck, it is a duck?



Now please do not get me started on Hunnius' Thesis #1, because the more there the UOJer will be indicted by that thesis and their denial will show they are exercising sophistry.



6 comments:


Brett Meyer said...
New Steadfast discussion where the UOJists refuse to answer and even refuse to show proof of their teachings - Joe Krohn and Kilcrease have a hug fest while Kilcrease renounces the doctrine of Universal Election which Joe proclaims. http://steadfastlutherans.org/?p=22406&cpage=1#comments
LPC said...
Brett, Yes I notice, they are having a love fest right now. They are practicing self delusion amongst themselves. They multiply cop outs and simply ignore the points being raised against their doctrine. Something similar like this happens in the corporate world, they self justify their belief amongst themselves comforting one another by repeating their well worn mantras. LPC
Brett Meyer said...
Romans 2:15, "Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;
Dr. Jack Kilcrease said...
Here's my take on the whole Huber red herring: http://jackkilcrease.blogspot.com/2012/09/samuel-huber-red-herring-in-objective.html Enjoy. I invite the usual name calling and non sequiturs. Bear in mind I won't be responding to them.
LPC said...
Jack, Of course I am aware of your work and your type of arguments. I monitor Steadfast Waltherians even though they have banned me and I read your comments there. I speak to you as a fellow scholar since you have a PhD. Below are my honest comments about your type of (IMHO, low) scholarship which your readers completely do not see since today Lutherans have done theology by proxy. Here are your arguments... Walther in the Baier compendium specifically rejects Huber's doctrine (in fact he has a whole section on it!).  ME: This kind of comment makes think you have not read Calvin at all, which you should because you are a systematician, it is a must reading even if you do not agree with him. Calvin used the same technique that Walther used in the Baier compendium. For example, Calvin elsewhere borrowed concepts from Lutherans without giving credit to where he got them, he made people think that he was trying to be original in some good aspects of his theology. Here Walther did the same thing as Calvin but the reverse. Walther knew well that smart Lutherans would detect he was being a Huberite - but what he did was to attack Huber but at the same time borrowed Huber's nice idea of universal justification. So his Huberian criticism is what we scholars (and I thought you would have known this but I was mistaken), a smoke screen. The authors of Errors of Missouri pointed this technique out and, no offense, between you and Stellhorn and Schmidt they knew more Calvinism than you do today. That is why they gain credibility with me simply because when they spoke about their critique of Calvinism, I agree with them because I was a former Calvinist and have read Calvin's writing myself. You and McCain do not know what you are talking about when you accuse us of crypto-Calvinism. 2. Huber did talk about a universal justification, but his heresy was more about and a reaction to the doctrine of election. Advocates of OJ such as Walther always taught particular election. ME: You make this sound as if it is of no consequence. You have not read Hunnius have you? Did you know that Hunnius wrote more than one tract to oppose Huber? Did you know that Hunnius both attacked Huber's doctrine of Election and Justification at the same time? It is not what OJ teach about Election that is at debPublish Postate at the moment, let us do first things first, and that is the central doctrine of Scripture - Justification. We shall come to the UOJ/OJ teaching on Election later. For after all as Luther said, you may get any teaching in the Bible right (even about election), but if you get justification wrong, you still are in pile of pooh. So you are giving your fans a fasle hope making them think that the Huberian accusation of UOJ teaching is immune from faults in their justification teaching. cont...
LPC said...
cont... 3. Moreover, since Huber claimed that justification was not merely pronounced to all (objective justification), but communicated to all (functional universalism), he has virtually no place for subjective justification. This would pretty much destroy the entire point of the distinction between objective and subjective justification.  ME: Firstly you appear to have not read Rydecki's translation but I will allow your point. Let us assume you are correct. You can do your distinctions until the moon becomes cheese but it won't avail because the issue is not subjective justification, the issue is universal justification as properly taken, to wit - the declaration of righteousness (not the payment of sins but the acquittal declaration). Is there such a thing in Scripture respecting the proper use of the term - justification? You UOJers agree with Huber on universal justification, that is the first starting point. The problem is that Huber was much more consistent than you lot. It stands to reason that if there is such a universal justification, then the so called subjective justification you propose is superfluous. However, to put it mildly you are lying about Huber as if Huber did not believe in personal justification like you do. Huber did not deny the need for faith which in your terminology subjective justification. Jack let me break this down to you so you can be more efficient in your propaganda in promoting UOJ and comforting UOJers. Deal with the question of universal absolution/justification. Show from Scripture and by exegesis where this is found properly respecting the term - justification. For we do not deny that Jesus died for all and hence, atoned for all. We do deny however that atonement and justification are the same. They are not the same. Thus and hence, we deny that though Jesus atoned for the sins of the world, it does not mean thereby that the whole world got already justified/declared righteous in Christ as your LC-MS 1932 Brief Statement Article 17b states. I am in the negative, you are in the positive. In debate, you are expected to show positively by exegesis this universal justification or objective justification you speak about. If you are using Romans 4:25 I have dealt with that verse in this blog countless times. LPC


'via Blog this'

Thirteenth Sunday after Trinity. Luke 10:23-37.
The Good Samaritan



The Thirteenth Sunday after Trinity, 2012


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson




The Hymn # 281     The Savior Calls               1:29
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed             p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #259            Flung to the Heedless Winds 1:64 

The Good Samaritan Is Jesus

The Communion Hymn # 308 Invited, Lord, by Boundless Grace                    1:63
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 464     Blest Be the Tie That Binds            1:39 

KJV Galatians 3:15 Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. 16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. 18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise. 19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator. 20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one. 21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. 22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

KJV Luke 10:23 And he turned him unto his disciples, and said privately, Blessed are the eyes which see the things that ye see: 24 For I tell you, that many prophets and kings have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them. 25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? 26 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? 27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. 28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. 29 But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour? 30 And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. 31 And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. 32 And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side. 33 But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, 34 And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. 35 And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee. 36 Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves? 37 And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.

Thirteenth Sunday After Trinity

Lord God, heavenly Father, we most heartily thank Thee that Thou hast granted us to live in this accepted time, when we may hear Thy holy gospel, know Thy fatherly will, and behold Thy Son, Jesus Christ! We pray Thee, most merciful Father: Let the light of Thy holy word remain with us, and so govern our hearts by Thy Holy Spirit, that we may never forsake Thy word, but remain steadfast in it, and finally obtain eternal salvation; through Thy beloved Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

The Good Samaritan, by Norma Boeckler
http://www.normaboecklerart.com

The Good Samaritan Is Jesus

I remember the feeling, when this lesson came up in church – Now we are going to get it for not being good Samaritans.

There are so many law sermons on this lesson that one could build a complete set of books: The Good Samaritan Condemns You, Four Volumes.

This Gospel does not start with condemnation, but with blessing instead. And that blessing applies to us.

KJV Luke 10:23 And he turned him unto his disciples, and said privately, Blessed are the eyes which see the things that ye see: 24 For I tell you, that many prophets and kings have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.

Every single person who hears the Word of God is blessed. In those days they were able to see and hear the Savior. Now we hear His words and see Him in the Sacraments.

It is always a blessing because God’s Word is always effective. Those who listen attentively and sincerely will receive divine wisdom and guidance from the Holy Spirit. Also, those who reject it will be hardened and blinded by it, just as those who mishandle electrical power will be harmed by their careless attitude toward something both life-giving and death-causing.

There are many occasions when someone has obstinately resisted the Word but is so disturbed that another visitation creates a moment of conversion, insight, and rebirth. We cannot judge when that will happen, so the Word is carelessly sown, knowing the results are always good.

Verse 24 should remind us that we are more privileged than many prophets and kings. Before the Savior’s public ministry, many leaders longed for the salvation of mankind. They desired forgiveness and peace. They looked for the truth. One could say that the entire history of philosophy has been a search for the truth. Most philosophers today (in academic life) are atheists, so they cannot grasp the basics of truth. They may dance around us in circles with their arcane knowledge, but Jesus said we need the faith of a little child, not the library of a learned philosopher  - to enter the Kingdom of God.

Analogy of Faith
When we grasp the Analogy of Faith, the Scriptures come alive with an endless supply of insights.

Someone asked me about the Analogy of Faith. I forgot the term since I never use the words themselves. But I often bring up that ancient truth of the Scriptures.

Here it is – Since the Word of God is infallible and inerrant, the Scriptures present a unified truth where no contradictions are present. The Bible is the Book of the Holy Spirit, with many human authors but only one divine author, God. Because of that, the unity and harmony we find is the quality given to it by the Holy Spirit. I have emphasized that in all the sermons and Bible lessons. Hebrews uses an exotic set of images and aims at a Jewish group persecuted and discouraged, but the author does not argue against Paul. He teaches justification by faith with different words and images at times, but the same doctrine revealed by God.

Therefore, every verse is connected to every other verse in the Bible. The simpler and more obvious passages can be used to explain the ones that seem more obscure to us. The fault is not with God’s Word but with our understanding of the moment. At times, for instance, people had no trouble with divinity of Jesus, but they could not accept His birth from a mere woman, a sinful woman. Many errors came from that attitude – not from the Scriptures but from man’s culture at the moment. Now people (in general) have no trouble with the humanity of Christ, but they seek to remove the divinity of Jesus. Thomas Jefferson did that with his heavily edited Bible, which reduced Jesus to a teacher of morality.

It is good to note that liberals always pixelate the Bible. They find one passage, one part of one sentence, and magnify that to be the entire message of the Word of God. They magnify it to such an extent that no one can recognize it in context. And they make their newest insight The Law, The Truth. One well known scholar made Jesus the leader of a sacred mushroom cult. I know – I missed that in the Bible, too. I laughed when I read that the mushroom starring in the book did not grow in that area. But the book sold well for a few weeks.

The Analogy of Faith also means that we must teach the Word of God with all aspects in balance, in proper proportion. To emphasize the Sacraments at the expense of the Word (as the Romanists do) is bound to create problems. The Holy Spirit’s work should not be neglected, but it should not be the only element in all teaching, as if the Trinity has only one Member.

This digression helps explain how we need to read this famous but greatly abused Parable of the Good Samaritan –

25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?

It was and continues to be a Jewish tradition to have the teacher answer questions after giving a lesson. One of the interesting parts about this is trying to stump the teacher. That is a great tradition, because it makes the hearers more eager to excel and it challenges the teacher. Just the opposite is the papal attitude – that the teacher is perfect and everyone must bow to his authority just because he has that title. Abusive cults thrive on that attitude.

So we have a valid question, which Jesus turned into a question.

26 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?

The lawyer has to answer his own question, which is good. This is good diagnostic work. He may be right or wrong. One can build on either answer.

27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. 28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.

It is no accident that the answer given is the famous summary of the Law, where there is widespread agreement. The rabbis taught this. Jesus taught this. Luther called it the Two Tables or the two relationships. The first relationship is faith, our relationship to God. The second is our relationship to our neighbor. The Law (better – the Doctrine of the Bible) is summed up in those two relationships.

For the Law salesmen, Jesus’ answer is a god-send. As one said to me, Jesus told us – Do this. It is in doing.

If they could stop there, they might make a Law fortress out of this lesson. But Jesus’ answer is ironic, something lost on those with no sense of humor. Is it possible to do this at all times, perfectly? Giving the fallen nature of man, no – it is not, so there must be another answer.

The lawyer revealed his attitude toward the Word when he said this –

29 But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour?

Or, we might say – eager to justify himself. He was waiting for an answer that he had done all he could do to inherit eternal life. His answer to the question came in the form of the great parable. Love your neighbor? Who is your neighbor? We can see at the end that the neighbor is Jesus, the Good Samaritan.

30 And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead.

“A certain man” means this is a parable, a short story, fiction, with a heavenly meaning.

This is a common occurrence in travel, a common fear. When cash is relatively scarce, clothing is quite valuable. In fact, there are scams today to collect clothing in the name of charity, because of its value. This man was robbed and beaten, left for dead on the road.

31 And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. 32 And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side.

Jesus gave two examples of men who avoided helping their neighbor. The priest and Levite crossed over to the opposite side of the road, to pretend they saw nothing. The roads were fairly narrow, certainly by our standards, so this was a pretense.

There are many priests and Levites today. They see a confessional pastor in trouble. They cross over to the other side of the road. They do not see it. Or they phone and say, “This is all your fault for causing trouble.” They do not help and they shun the fellow-pastor who is robbed, beaten, and left for dead on the road. The willfully blind do not see it.

33 But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him,

Notice that the word “good” is lacking in the text. That has become part of the title, leading us to think this is about good people (who perfect themselves in the Law) and bad people (who are the target of a given Law sermon).

The certain Samaritan is Jesus. His example shows that He alone is the Savior.

He saw the man and had compassion on him. The prime quality of God is compassion, mercy. We have great collects that say God’s power is shown chiefly in His mercy.

34 And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him.

When we are half-dead and unable to help ourselves, Jesus comes to us with the Gospel. We do not have the strength to come to Him. He comes to us in the Word and the Sacraments.

Look at the many steps taken for this this man:
  1. Went to him – God pursues us with His Word, He comes to us.
  2. Bound up his wounds – Forgiveness of sin, justification by faith
  3. Poured on oil and wine – Oil is Gospel forgiveness, wine is the Law.
  4. Set him on his beast – God provides continuing help.
  5. Brought him to an inn – He created the church for the Means of Grace.
  6. Took care of him – The care and compassion are continuous.

As Luther said about Galatians and Paul’s greeting – grace and peace are two great words. Grace comes from God – it is the forgiveness that takes away our sins. Peace is the result of this forgiveness, which we receive through faith.

Even better, this forgiveness is not for tiny sins but for great sins, not for conquered sins (because no one can conquer his own sins) but for nagging sins.
This forgiveness is for many, for all sins.



The wounded does not deserve healing. The wounded needs healing. As we know from many medical shows, the healing needs to start early.

We are not forgiven because we deserve forgiveness. The healing begins with the Gospel, because without forgiveness the wounds continue to fester and worsen. There are many stories of ancients who had one wound and died as a result. One man kicked a stone in frustration and died later from the infection that began from that injury.

Luther pointed out – the oil represents the healing of the Gospel, the wine the antiseptic qualities of the Law.

God’s care is continuous. It is not an instant of forgiveness and “never do this again” but a life-long relationship. Abiding on the True Vine – as Jesus explained in John 15. Note the Analogy of Faith.

Christ created the church by sending the Holy Spirit, the Means of Grace for our life as Christians. He also continues to care for each every one of us.

35 And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.

This is perfect example of how God works through the Gospel, because the earlier steps were not only adequate but far beyond human efforts. On top of those previous ways to help the man, the Christ-figure speaks to the inn-keeper and says, “Here is money for the rest of his recovery. If you spend more, I will pay you back.”

We could see the inn-keeper as those of us within the church who care for others. Whatever we spend in time and money on others will be paid back, when “He comes again.” There are many examples in the teaching of Jesus to show that what is spent or taken away from us will be returned to us many times over (Analogy of Faith again).

Man looks at this as balancing accounts. Why help a stranger? I will be out some money, risk something, and never get paid back, never thanked even. The true Gospel message is to help without expect pay, rewards, or thanks. That is why the visible church is breaking down. Career-minded clergy put their own accounts first and will not risk anything for someone beaten, robbed, and left half-dead on the road.

36 Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves? 37 And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.

Love your neighbor, first of all, means love and trust in Christ. John 16:8ff teaches without any doubt – sin is not believing in Christ.

This is not a Law parable but a Gospel parable. The Law salesmen never realize that good works come from a good person. Faith in Christ makes us good, so forgiveness leads to good works as the fruit of faith.

Thirteenth Sunday after Trinity
Covenant and Grace

"The Old Testament dealt with the promises of God to the chosen people. Thereby God placed Himself in 'covenant' relation to Israel (berith). This relation, like the promises and the gifts of God to Israel, is always onesided. It is always God's covenant, not Israel's, and not a mutual agreement, not a suntheke. This promise and covenant indeed obligates Israel, and Israel assumes these obligations, but the covenant emanates entirely from God."
            R. C. H. Lenski, The Interpretation of the Epistle to the Hebrews, Columbus: Lutheran Book Concern, 1938, p. 235. Hebrews 7:22;        

"To be sure, Baptism is so great that if you turn from sins and appeal to the covenant of Baptism, your sins are forgiven. Only see to it--if you sin in this wicked and wanton manner by presuming on God's grace--that the judgment does not lay hold of you and forestall your turning back. And even if you then wanted to believe and trust in your Baptism, your trial might by God's decree, be so great that faith could not stand the strain. If they scarcely remain in the faith who do no sin or who fall because of sheer weakness, where will your brazen wickedness remain, which has challenged and mocked God's grace? Let us, therefore, walk with care and fear that we may hold fast the riches of God's grace with a firm faith and joyfully give thanks to His mercy forever and ever. Amen."
            Martin Luther, What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, I, p. 57. Treatise on Baptism, 1519  

"And, in a word, it remains eternally true what the Son of God says, John 15:5: Without Me ye can do nothing. And Paul, Philippians 2:13: It is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of His good pleasure. To all godly Christians who feel and experience in their hearts a small spark or longing for divine grace and eternal salvation this precious passage is very comforting; for they know that God has kindled in their hearts this beginning of true godliness, and that He will further strengthen and help them in their great weakness to persevere in true faith unto the end."
            Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, II. 14. Free Will Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 885. Philippians 2:13; John 15:5      

"These treasures are offered us by the Holy Ghost in the promise of the holy Gospel; and faith alone is the only means by which we lay hold upon, accept, and apply, and appropriate them to ourselves. This faith is a gift of God, by which we truly learn to know Christ, our Redeemer, in the Word of the Gospel, and trust in Him, that for the sake of His obedience alone we have the forgiveness of sins by grace, are regarded as godly and righteous by God the Father, and are eternally saved."            Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III 10 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 919.        

"Moreover, neither contrition nor love or any other virtue, but faith alone is the sole means and instrument by which and through which we can receive and accept the grace of God, the merit of Christ, and the forgiveness of sins, which are offered to us in the promise of the Gospel."
            Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III 31 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 925.