Saturday, September 8, 2012

A. Berean Explores the UOJ Horror of Faith

When these are the leaders, everyone knows
anything goes.


A. Berean has left a new comment on your post "The Epitome of the Formula of Concord - On the Rig...":

It seems that if anyone ever mentions faith in the article of justification they are labeled as Synergists because its something that we have to do.

Yea...only if you take your eyes off of all the passages in Scripture which says that it is the Holy Ghost alone (divine monergism) who creates and preserves justifying faith in the heart through His Means of Grace...even laymen are able to see that...

Are they just afraid of the crux theologorum? Don't they have enough humility that when it comes to the crux they can't just say, "We don't know because Scripture does not answer that?"

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "A. Berean Explores the UOJ Horror of Faith":

The root of the problem is that UOJists lack the very thing that they despise as a synergistic work and that just happens to be what the Holy Spirit uses to enlighten and reveal the Scriptures and what they truly mean.

They saw off the very branch the Holy Spirit uses to attach Christians to the Tree of Life.

---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "A. Berean Explores the UOJ Horror of Faith":

A Berean -

Excellent observation! And, I'll maintain that the universal objective justification enthusiasts really don't possess a genuine theology of the cross! How can they when their flaccid theory rejects God the Holy Spirit leading the way to create faith in the heart of the human soul? As much as they would pay lip service to "justification by faith" and make occasional reference to the Spirit; they, instead are all wrapped up in their evangelistic "solution" to the world by encouraging their mesmorized congregational members to tell all their neighbors that Jesus forgives them; period! These UOJ con artists will always stop short. That's their very nature. They fail to preach and teach the whole counsel of God. They ride the Atonement of Christ, as if it was the last hobby horse on earth for them to ride!

Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org
www.moralmatters.org

---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "A. Berean Explores the UOJ Horror of Faith":

Brett Meyer -

I'll say it since, (I think) you were too polite:

The universal objective justification die hards, lop off [as you say] the very essence which they so desperately lack and need to experience, themselves! [No wonder they are so stiff and ingrown!]

Not only do they "saw off" [your apt description] faith; they actually do faith dirty and molest it to such an extent that they must even make the Holy Spirit blush by their undermining activity!

Giving the Holy Spirit His due and preaching faith, is, as to them almost as feared as a stake, mirror and cross to a Vampire.

Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org
www.moralmatters.org

The Epitome of the Formula of Concord - On the Righteousness of Faith


narrow-minded has left a new comment on your post "Unanimous Decision - A Surprising Verdict for the ...":

From "The Epitome of the Formula of Concord, Article III, Affirmative Thesis":

3. We believe, teach, and confess that faith alone is the means and instrument whereby we lay hold of Christ, and thus in Christ of that righteousness which avails before God, for whose sake this faith is imputed to us for righteousness, Rom. 4:5.

6] 4. We believe, teach, and confess that this faith is not a bare knowledge of the history of Christ, but such a gift of God by which we come to the right knowledge of Christ as our Redeemer in the Word of the Gospel, and trust in Him that for the sake of His obedience alone we have, by grace, the forgiveness of sins, are regarded as holy and righteous before God the Father, and eternally saved.

---

Affirmative Theses. Formula of Concord, Epitome, III, 
The Righteousness of Faith

Pure Doctrine of the Christian Churches against Both Errors Just Mentioned.

1. Against both the errors just recounted, we unanimously believe, teach, and confess that Christ is our Righteousness neither according to the divine nature alone nor according to the human nature alone, but that it is the entire Christ according to both natures, in His obedience alone, which as God and man He rendered to the Father even unto death, and thereby merited for us the forgiveness of sins and eternal life, as it is written: As by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of One shall many be made righteous, Rom. 5:19.

2. Accordingly, we believe, teach, and confess that our righteousness before God is (this very thing], that God forgives us our sins out of pure grace, without any work, merit, or worthiness of ours preceding, present, or following, that He presents and imputes to us the righteousness of Christ's obedience, on account of which righteousness we are received into grace by God, and regarded as righteous.

3. We believe, teach, and confess that faith alone is the means and instrument whereby we lay hold of Christ, and thus in Christ of that righteousness which avails before God, for whose sake this faith is imputed to us for righteousness, Rom. 4:5.

4. We believe, teach, and confess that this faith is not a bare knowledge of the history of Christ, but such a gift of God by which we come to the right knowledge of Christ as our Redeemer in the Word of the Gospel, and trust in Him that for the sake of His obedience alone we have, by grace, the forgiveness of sins, are regarded as holy and righteous before God the Father, and eternally saved.

5. We believe, teach, and confess that according to the usage of Holy Scripture the word justify means in this article, to absolve, that is, to declare free from sins. Prov. 17:15: He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the righteous, even they both are abomination to the Lord. Also Rom. 8:33: Who shall lay anything to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth.

And when, in place of this, the words regeneratio and vivificatio, that is, regeneration and vivification, are employed, as in the Apology, this is done in the same sense. By these terms, in other places, the renewal of man is understood, and distinguished from justification by faith.

6. We believe, teach, and confess also that notwithstanding the fact that many weaknesses and defects cling to the true believers and truly regenerate, even to the grave, still they must not on that account doubt either their righteousness which has been imputed to them by faith, or the salvation of their souls, but must regard it as certain that for Christ's sake, according to the promise and [immovable] Word of the holy Gospel, they have a gracious God.

7. We believe, teach, and confess that for the preservation of the pure doctrine concerning the righteousness of faith before God it is necessary to urge with special diligence the particulae exclusivae, that is, the exclusive particles, i. e., the following words of the holy Apostle Paul, by which the merit of Christ is entirely separated from our works, and the honor given to Christ alone, when the holy Apostle Paul writes: Of grace, without merit, without Law, without works, not of works. All these words together mean as much as that we are justified and saved alone by faith in Christ. Eph. 2:8; Rom. 1:17; 3:24; 4:3ff.; Gal. 3:11; Heb. 11.

8. We believe, teach, and confess that, although the contrition that precedes, and the good works that follow, do not belong to the article of justification before God, yet one is not to imagine a faith of such a kind as can exist and abide with, and alongside of, a wicked intention to sin and to act against the conscience. But after man has been justified by faith, then a true living faith worketh by love, Gal. 5:6, so that thus good works always follow justifying faith, and are surely found with it, if it be true and living; for it never is alone, but always has with it love and hope.

Unanimous Decision - A Surprising Verdict for the UOJ Hive of Enthusiasts



narrow-minded has left a new comment on your post "No One Is Obliged To Use or Accept the Fraudulent ...":

"Theses Opposed to Huberianism," by Aegidius Hunnius, pp.32-33:

Thesis 77

Therefore, if you remove the cardinal question between us and Huber and ask, "Whom did God decree to save in the purpose of His eternal election?," there Christ and Paul answer unanimously: "Those who believe in Christ," and "no one except for them," says the Epitome of the Book of Concord.









No One Is Obliged To Use or Accept the Fraudulent OJ/SJ Categories.
Where the Water Is Murky, Return to the Source

The efficacy of the Word permeates the Scriptures, Luther, and the Book of Concord.
Efficacy is absent in UOJ.


  • I deny palm-reading. 
  • I reject astrology. 
  • I question revelations from the souls suffering in Purgatory. 


And I make it a habit to repudiate Objective Justification and its impoverished cousin Subjective Justification whenever I can.

The UOJ Enthusiasts start from the perspective of their favorite categories - OJ and SJ. Neither one is found in the Scriptures, the Book of Concord, Luther, Melanchthon, Chemnitz, Chytraeus, or Leyser. Their beloved OJ was thrashed by Leyser (Book of Concord editor) and A. Hunnius.

The definition is an explanation of Knapp by the Calvinist Woods,
thus OJ and SJ are Calvinist terms.
WELS excommunicates people for NOT being Calvinists. Think about it.

Looking through my museum of Lutheran and Protestant books, I find the first mention of OJ and SJ in the published lectures of Georg Christian Knapp, Halle University, translated into English by Woods, a Calvinist superstar. My own copy was printed in English years before Bishop Martin Stephan, STD, and Pope Walther landed in New Orleans. The book is still in print.

Stephan studied at Halle and taught Walther his concept of justification, which greatly relieved Walther and literally saved him from death. Walther and his gang of clergy had been under the sway of a morbid, oppressive Pietist. When Kuehn got a call and promptly died, the Walther circle switched over to Stephan together. Cell groups can be quite cohesive. Stephan was a lot more fun, with all his young, female groupies, but future bishop and founder of the LCMS was another control freak. Stephan and Walther created the template for the abusive Lutheran pastor - think my way or you are going to Hell.

The beloved categories of OJ and SJ are from Knapp - not the Bible, the Book of Concord, or any sound Lutheran book The explanation of the categories is from his non-Lutheran translator. How about that, Walther fans?

The UOJ Enthusiasts keep anathematizing Lutherans for not using the terms deployed by a Calvinist. How is this for ironic humor - the terms worked their way into German publications and Walther endorsed them later. Achtung - Walther fans - the pope who warned against any outsider, the man who blamed Stephan's infidelity on the bishop's wife - he borrowed the Calvinist's terms and endorsed them for LCMS use.

On Facebook I keep seeing that Walther quotation, aimed against Methodist hymns. But where was his warning against Calvinist terms in a Halle Pietist's book? The Great Kidnapper kidnapped those terms for his own group. They were not widely accepted. F. Pieper taught them and the Walther-Pieper circle made them canonical.

That is the problem with published theology. The footprints are everywhere. Deny justification by faith? - the old catechisms only taught Luther's justification by faith. Promote UOJ as older than Adam and Eve? - baloney - UOJ has a birth date and a place. We have one fixed datum, and that datum is extremely important. Knapp was the last of the old-fashioned Halle Pietists. He was a giant of his time, even though his book was almost unreadable. That same German book became standard in English for all Protestants in America. When they went to seminary, Knapp was in their library. As the Protestants became more liberal and rationalistic, two justifications merged into one - universal forgiveness and salvation.

The cutie next to Karl Barth is his live-in mistress, Charlotte Kirschbaum.
Karl's wife, Nellie is on the right about six feet away,
like Mrs. Stephan, shoved aside for a younger girl.

The modern Protestant theologians are Schleiermacher and Karl Barth. Schleiermacher matches Knapp in readability. Barth is the superstar for 20th and 21st century theology. Karl and his Commie mistress are also the key theologians for Fuller Seminary.

The 19th century was not an age where every pastor published a book every year. Even recently, a printed book was an expensive budget item. Books used to cost $10,000 and more for an initial printing.  Print-on-Demand means the same book can be published for no initial cost. The Knapp book was on pastors' bookshelves in German and English throughout the 19th century, and people still read it today, thanks to widespread use of coffee, colas, and other stimulants.

Why should a Calvinist's explanation of a Pietist's theology be normative for me or any other Lutheran? The reason most people react against OJ and SJ is the efficacy of the Word (never mentioned by the UOJ Hive). People read God's Word and understand that Christ died for our sins. Their believe and receive God's declaration of forgiveness - justification by faith.

But, as Jon Buchholz' advisor has said, OJ and SJ have to be carefully presented, the way Jael explained things to Sisera (Judges 5:26). Once Jael-ed, the UOJ pastors (and precious few laity) persecute justification by faith: hounds of the Lord in their own minds but hounds of Hell in reality.

Jael's explanation left a deep impression on Sisera.


---

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2011/10/wels-reformation-summary-from-ac-v.html

This was published almost one year ago, for Reformation, 2011.

Calvinist Leonard Woods Jr. created the language of Objective Justification and
Subjective Justification in his famous 1831 translation of the Georg Christian Knapp dogmatics
textbook from Halle University, still in print today.
CFW Walther endorsed the double-justification OJ/SJ language decades later.


AC V has left a new comment on your post "What Huber and Knapp Have Accomplished In the Olde...":

Your Reformation celebration “WELS Connection” for today: “The history of UOJ in WELS”

We begin with Leonard Woods (1807-1878), born in West Newbury, Mass., graduated at Union College in 1827 and at Andover Theological Seminary in 1830. His translation of Georg Christian Knapp's Christian Theology (1831-1833) was long used as a text-book in American theological seminaries. http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Leonard_Woods

Woods and Andover Seminary were Calvinist.

This is the footnote Leonard Woods (Remember he was a Calvinist) put in his translation of Knapp’s Christian Theology under the article “The Scripture doctrine of pardon or justification through Christ as an UNIVERSAL and UNMERITED favor of God”:

"This is very conveniently expressed by the terms objective and subjective justification. Objective justification is the act of God, by which he proffers pardon to all through Christ; subjective, is the act of man, by which he accepts the pardon freely offered in the Gospel. The former is universal, the latter not."




Knapp was educated at Halle University, the center of Pietism,
and closely associated with August Hermann Franke.

Who was Georg Knapp whose Christian Theology textbook was so acceptable to Calvinists that is was “long used as a text-book in American theological seminaries”? Knapp was a theologian at Halle University in Germany in the late 1700s. Halle was a “Lutheran” University and a hotbed of Pietism and Rationalism.

Tholuck, a rationalist and Universalist, was Hoenecke's mentor
at Halle University.

The year after Knapp died in 1825 Friedrich Tholuck succeeded Knapp’s theology chair at Halle. Tholuck made it his aim to combine Rationalism with Pietism and, in spite of the opposition of the theological faculty of the university, he succeeded in changing the character of its theology. This he achieved partly by his lectures, but above all by his personal influence on the students. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_Tholuck.

Here’s the “WELS connection”:



Tholuck mentored Adolf Hoenecke who attended Halle as a student. Hoenecke often credited Tholuck for bringing him to faith http://www.studiumexcitare.com/content/66). Adolf Hoenecke was the first WELS Seminary professor beginning in 1866 when the Seminary was in Watertown, then in 1878 when it was in Wauwatosa, WI. His dogmatics notes, modified by Prof. John Schaller and later Prof. John Meyer and recently by the Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary staff, remain the basis for dogmatics studies at the Seminary.

http://www.studiumexcitare.com/content/66

To sum it up:

Halle University (Pietism/Rationalism) + Knapp (theology acceptable to Calvinists) + Tholuck (Influencial Rationalist/Pietist) + Hoenecke (UOJ in 2 Cor. 5:19) + Schaller (“Wauwatosa Gospel”) + Meyer (unbelievers are saints) + Kuske (“God declared all people righteous” Catechism Question #253) + Bivens ("all are sinners and all are justified," FiCl Oct. 2011) = UOJ today in WELS.

***

GJ - That is an excellent summary of the history of the Objective Justification and Subjective Justification terms, along with their association with Halle University. Halle, as the center of Pietism, was associated with Biblical studies, Christian faith, and missions. Orthodox Lutherans opposed Pietism, but the later years changed the adversaries. Halle became the center of rationalism in Biblical studies (Semler), and believers were considered Pietistics and mystics in an overwhelmingly rationalistic 19th century, when Stephan and Walther came over.

The ethnic Lutherans coming to America were allied with Pietism and unionism because the alternative was the rationalistic state church opposing them. The Augustana Synod Swedes and the Norwegians had that in common with Saxon Immigration Society in Perry County and St. Louis. The Buffalo Synod was another Pietistic exodus.


Pietist Johann Jakob Rambach was educated at Halle University.

Jay Webber quoated Rambach, the Halle Pietist, against Chemnitz, the senior editor of the Book of Concord::

I can understand why Chemnitz would read 1 Timothy 3:16 in this way. But his reading does not rule out what I would consider to be a necessary corrolary to such a "personal" justification of Jesus. The 18th-century Lutheran theologian Johann Jacob Rambach makes the following observation in his Ausfuehrliche Erklaerung der Epistel an die Roemer (p. 322), regarding the Lord's payment and satisfaction of sinful humanity's "debt" to God:

"Christ was in his resurrection first of all justified for his own person, Is. 50:5, 1 Tim. 3:16, since the righteousness of God declared that it had been paid and satisfied in full by this our Substitute, and issued him as it were a receipt thereof; and that happened in his resurrection, when he was released from his debtor's prison and set free. But since the Substitute was now justified, then in him also all debtors were co-justified."

Later in that commentary Rambach also writes (in a way that shows that he has 1 Tim. 3:16 in mind):

"The justification of the human race indeed also ocurred, in respect of the acquisition, in one moment, in the moment in which Christ rose and was thus declared righteous; but in respect of the appropriation it still continues till the last day."

***

GJ - The origins of UOJ are a combination of Calvinism and its midwife, Pietism. Samuel Huber was the first Lutheran to claim that the entire human race was absolved in the resurrection of Christ. He was a "former" Calvinist who was repudiated by Polycarp Leyser, an assistant editor of the Book of Concord. Why do Olde Synodical Conference Lutherans teach Huberism, which was utterly rejected by the Concordists still alive when he failed at teaching universal absolution?

Pietism lacks the foundation of the efficacious Word in the Means of Grace, because all Pietists believe the real church is the cell group, which gives energy and power to the congregation,  which is  nothing more than a convenient place to organize the cell groups. That is why the Sacraments and the sermon mean so little to the Lutheran CGM and Emergent Church efforts. The outward appearance of the congregation is necessary for foot traffic, but the real church is the cell group (small group, Bible study group, share group, care group, koinonia group, prayer group). 

Calvin taught that the Holy Spirit works separately from the Word and Sacraments. In fact, the Word and Sacraments are useless unless the Holy Spirit happens to drop by and do his work, according to the Swiss Reformer's published works.

The Olde Synodical Conference represents the triumph of Pietism, rationalism, and Calvinism.


---

LutherRocks has left a new comment on your post "WELS Reformation Summary - From AC V":

Outstanding work. Thanks for posting.

I remember hearing on more than one occasion when I was into CGM...people these days vote with their feet. How upside down is that? We cater to their feet? Or this one...the unchurched come to church for the wrong reasons and end up staying for the right reasons...huh? And the 'poor miserable sinner' is left unattended to...

***

GJ - And where are the "orthodox Lutheran leaders" opposing this Dreck, Joe? They are scheming to start more businesses under the cover of the synod - like coaching, estate planning (their own), etc.

Friday, September 7, 2012

Retired Pastor Raises Intuitu Fide Charge in Jesus' Quotion


Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "The Augustana Synod Understood the Biblical View o...":

Ichabod -

Without looking up the Scripture (as I am very tired right now); didn't Jesus go on, to tell His disciples: "If you had the faith of a mustard seed, you could tell this mountain to uproot itself.......?" [Paraphrase]

In other words; I believe that Christ was telling His disciples: "Forget this business about having and asking for big faith; but exercise the faith that you presently [already] possess!" And, doesn't Scripture say that God apportions a measure of faith to his individual children? Actually, that question by Christ's disciples about increasing their faith was an insult. They had already been granted faith; they just needed to act within the present apportioned realms of that God given faith.

So, it is today in multiplied Christian households where God's children freeze at the very first experience of difficulty; whether it is financial, work related or, whatever. Instead of being like David (who "encouraged himself in the Lord"), Christians don't don't remind themselves of their faith as is the essence of the old Negro spiritual:

"I shall; I shall not be moved. I, shall; I shall not be moved;
Just like a tree; that's planted by the waters; I....shall not be moved!

Jesus is my Savior; I shall not be moved; Jesus is my Savior; I shall not be moved;
Just like a tree, that's planted by the water; I...., shall not be moved!"

The [above] aforementioned song I learned one Saturday night as an adolescent. My father had invited the black Detroit Lutheran minister, Rev. Percy Dumas, to preach for Sunday's Mission Festival; at Trinity Lutheran; Merritt Twp. Bay City. Mom and Dad invited Percy for Saturday evening supper and to spend the night with us. After supper Dad asked Pastor Dumas to play the piano in the living room and sing some Negro spirituals. I'll never forget that evening! There's nothing like singing spiritual songs and hymns that can have the effect of reminding us of the faith that the Lord has given us!

Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org
www.moralmatters.org

The Augustana Synod Understood the Biblical View of Faith - They Read Luther



The apostles said unto the Lord, Increase our faith. Luke 17:5. There are those who hear and read the gospel and what is said by faith, and immediately conclude that they have a correct conception of what is faith. They think that faith is something which is altogether in their own power to have or not to have, as any other natural work. When in their hearts they begin to think that the doctrine is right, and believe it is true, they immediately conclude that faith is present. But as soon as they see and feel in themselves and others that no change has taken place, that they remain in their old ways, they conclude that faith is not sufficient, that they must have something more and greater than faith. Then they cry: "Faith alone does not do it." Why? Because there are so many who believe, and no better than before. Such people are those whom Jude in his epistle calls dreamers, who deceive themselves with their own dreams.

 The true faith, of which we speak, cannot be manufactured by our own thoughts, for it is solely a work of God in us without any assistance on our part. It is God's gift and grace. Faith is something very powerful, active, restless, effective, which at one renews a person and regenerates him and leads him altogether into a new manner and character of life, so that it is impossible not to do good without ceasing. Just as natural as it is for the tree to produce fruit, so natural it is for faith to produce works.

Whoever has not this faith talks but vainly about faith and works, and does not know what he says. For he has not received it; he juggles with lies and applies Scriptures where they speak of faith and works to his own dreams and false thoughts, which are purely a human work. Whereas the Scriptures attribute both faith and works not to ourselves, but to God alone. We should therefore despair and pray to God for faith as the apostles did. When we have faith we need nothing more, for it brings with it the Holy Spirit, who not only teaches us all things, but also firmly establishes us in them, and leads us through death and hell to heaven. 

Devotional Readings from Luther's Works -- For Every Day of the Year -, Augustana Book Concern, Rock Island, IL, 1915

---

bruce-church (http://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "The Augustana Synod Understood the Biblical View o...":

Professor Preus at Irvine, CA, is involved in the Wittenberg Latin school renovation. A big mall (German style) is going up right across the street, so that will draw a lot of people next to the building. They finally have architectural drawings for the renovation:

video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_tm6ocGBqc&feature=share

Pipe Organ Concert - Historic St. John Lutheran Church - September 16, 2012, 3 PM








Ken Schurb Begging the Question - "Does the Lutheran Confessions' Emphasis on Subjective Justification Mitigate Their Teaching of Objective Justification?"



The UOJ contingent wanted me to read Ken Schurb's essay, "Does the Lutheran Confessions' Emphasis on Subjective Justification Mitigate Their Teaching of Objective Justification?" Concordia, Ft. Wayne sells the essay, which I read years ago.

I forwarded the PDF to Brett Meyer, who replied with the quotation illustrated above.

One part of the essay is correct -

The Confessions never use the word “justify” unless faith is at least in the immediate context. p. 4.

But the next sentence is dead wrong and misleading, because it makes an unwarranted claim:


And they never explicitly distinguish between objective and subjective justification. (The late Dr. Harry Huth used to point out these two facts to his symbolics classes at Concordia Theological Seminary Ft. Wayne. The present writer took his introductory courses in the summer of 1979, and reports both of these observations on the basis of first-hand experience.) p. 4.

The title of the essay and this clumsy thesis are prime examples of begging the question, a logical fallacy.

When one begs the question, the initial assumption of a statement is treated as already proven without any logic to show why the statement is true in the first place. http://begthequestion.info/

The author begins with the assumption of two justifications in the Book of Concord, conceding there is only one (justification by faith) then claiming via a professor that there really are two justifications. The Book of Concord is just not explicit about this alleged fact.

Let us examine the Biblical basis for the Assumption of Mary, using the same kind of fallacy. The Bible never says that she was assumed into heaven. However, Mary appears in the Book of Acts and her death is never mentioned there or anywhere else in the New Testament, making this a real possibility. Nothing disproves the Assumption of Mary.

Here is another winner from the same essay, page 5:


But the scenario has its problems. Most obvious is the one Edward Preuss reports: “The Wurttemberg superintendent Burk experienced . . . [what] seemed to him like a faulty circle:
I am to believe and thereby become righteous. However, I cannot believe this before it is so. And yet, it is not so, for I am first to become righteous. (The Justification of the Sinner Before God, Edward Preuss, tr. by J.A. Friedrich Reprint. St. Louis, n.d.), 22.) “God be praised,” Preuss continues, “the case is different.” It can only be different, however, if one believes in objective justification. This gives him an object for his trust.
There is a place to join this “circle.”


Like I said before, Eduard Preuss is the Bo Derek of UOJ fanatics, an old favorite of Boomers. Preuss left the Lutheran Church for Romanism and used his considerable skills to promote the Immaculate Conception of Mary! Nevertheless, this fact about him is omitted from every UOJ citation. Preuss is introduced instead as a reliable orthodox Lutheran, not an Enthusiast who turned to Rome when he saw a brilliant sunset (see the Fuerbringer book). The Burk mentioned may be the Pietist who wrote an early endorsement of UOJ, recorded by Hoenecke in his Dogmatics.

The LCMS pastors begin with the framework of double-justification, then wedge all their data into that position, as this essay does.

The WELS pastors begin with world absolution. God has declared the entire world, "Not guilty!" Any questioning of that astonishing verdict is considered reason for excommunication. As they say in all the Hitler videos, "The irony will dawn on them later."

Both groups of pastors assume that their synods have taught this truth since the very beginning, whether it was Walther's discovery of the syphilis plague spreading from Bishop Martin Stephan or WELS turning down the loot from the union mission society (no Thrivent, we don't mean you - we love your money).

Both groups contain large numbers of pastors who know that UOJ/double-justification is a crock. Both groups have published materials that teach only justification by faith. Gausewitz and the KJV catechism are two examples easily obtained.



The title of this essay was never a sincere question. Instead, it was a feint, a set-up to make the reader think this was really a research topic when it was a polemic for double-justification. We should pity all the seminarians who accepted the professor's deceptive claims. I have seen similar assertions from the early Robert Preus and from Dan Deutschlander.

Relax readers, it is possible for someone to have erred. My own sins are confessed on a daily basis. Three blogs have been set up and dismantled for that onerous and time-consuming task.

UOJ specialists make it personal, writing, "I do not agree with you." In sorrow, I have to reply, "That does not matter. The issue is whether you agree with the Scriptures and the Confessions." I am only a curator of the Lutheran museum. I describe and stir up interest in the musty old exhibits. Admission is free. I do not have the power to silence anyone, to ban their feeble blogs, to cost them money.

A layman observed, "They criticize Luther endlessly, but Walther is never wrong about anything. No one dares to criticize the American Pope." A poorly-trained man with two years in the parish should not be the ruling norm of Lutheran doctrine in America. Did you think I meant Paul McCain? That fits too.

Luther earned a doctorate in theology. It is true that he studied at a Roman Catholic university and read endless amounts of false doctrine. That seemed to be God's way of preparing him for the Reformation. Pastors sometimes think of that when they rouse themselves to outline a Reformation sermon. Luther spent his life debating doctrine with false teachers. That sharpened his knowledge of the Scriptures and church history, as he observed.

Likewise, Chemnitz earned a doctorate in theology. He also debated doctrine with a host of opponents. He wrote a monumental set against the Council of Trent, but also defended Luther's doctrine against the Calvinists. Chemnitz was uniquely qualified to be senior editor of the Book of Concord and the Formula of Concord. Much the same could be said of the others. I was thinking that the lesser known Concordists and men like Hunnius would put all the synod lackey seminary professors to shame. We are in dire straits.


Lutheran pastors are so lazy and ignorant that they cannot acknowledge the growth of Robert Preus in his years of scholarship. He was definitely a UOJ cheerleader when he was also promoting Church Growth at Ft. Wayne. He changed his mind about both. His final book records his thoughts about justification by faith. Do the indolent notice, or are they too afraid to open a book that shreds their dogmatics notes?

PS - The Preuss citations in the Schurb reminded me that he promoted many of the current arguments in favor of UOJ, such as "your faith is in faith" or "I cannot believe unless I already have something to believe in, something already accomplished." They never argue, "As Eduard Preuss, who finished his career promoting Roman dogma used to say..."

That is why your curator has to dust off his old exhibits, bring them out the storage room (your storage, not mine) and display them again.


Thursday, September 6, 2012

Doing Works for the Forgiveness of Sins

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opus_Dei



This the papists do not believe, but being blind and obstinate, they defend their abominations, having in their mouths these execrable words: He that doth this good work, or that, deserveth forgiveness of his sins: whosoever entertaineth into this or that holy order, and keepth this rule, to him we assuredly promise everlasting life. It cannot be uttered what a horrible blasphemy this is. For if no flesh can be justified by the works of the law, much less shall it be justified by the rules of Benedict, Francis, or Augustine, in which there is not one jot of true faith in Christ; but this only they teach, that whosoever keepeth their rules hath everlasting life.

                    Martin Luther, Kregel, Galatians 2:15-16, p. 74f.


Note Luther on the Lamb of God Passage, John 1:29



We must learn  to discern all laws, yea, even the law of God, and all works, from the promise of the Gospel, and from faith, that we may define Christ rightly. For Christ is no law, and therefore He is no exactor of the law and works, but “He is the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sins of the world” (St. John 1:29). This doth faith alone lay hold of, and not charity, which yet, as a certain thankfulness must follow faith. Wherefore victory over sin and death, salvation and everlasting life, came not by the law, nor by the works of the
law, nor yet by the power of free will, but by Jesus Christ only and alone.

         Martin Luther, Kregel, Galatians, 2:15-16, p. 74.

We Are in Christ by Faith, And He Is in Us




When we are in the matter of justification, there is no time or place to speak of the law: but the question is, what Christ is, and what benefit He hath brought unto us. Christ is not the law; He is not my work, or the work of the law; He is not my charity, my obedience, my poverty; but He is the Lord of life and death, a Mediator, a Savior, a Redeemer of those that are under the law and sin. In Him we are by faith, and He in us.

Martin Luther, Kregel, Galatians 2:15-16, p. 73.

---

A. Berean has left a new comment on your post "We Are in Christ by Faith, And He Is in Us":

"That at that time ye were WITHOUT Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: But now IN Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ."

Ephesians 2:12, 13

***

GJ - The latest mantra, I hear, is to say the entire world is righteous IN CHRIST, which is nonsense, since only believers are in Christ.

The same tactic is used when UOJ Advocates say, "We are saved BY GRACE." Connecting justification to faith is the norm for the Scriptures and the Confessions. This BY GRACE business is used by the mainline denominations to promote universal salvation.

Long ago I heard liberals say, "You cannot make salvation contingent upon faith!" What about Paul, saying "If we believe...?" in Romans 4:24 - the missing verse of UOJ. What about the Lutheran Reformation, which turned on justification by faith versus justification by works. And, wrote Luther, if not by faith, then it is by works. That puts UOJ solidly in the works camp while taking shelter under their bizarre concept of grace.

But there is a  fake-grace dividend. Universal righteousness makes unionism possible, mandatory, God-pleasing and just plain fun. Universal righteousness, which we find in Schleiermacher and Barth, simply negates any doctrinal or liturgical distinctions. All are righteous. All are forgiven. All are saved. When DP Jon Buchholz distinguishes the WELS heresy from the Evangelicals, he fails to note that he is one with ELCA, all the mainline churches, the Universalists, and various oddball sects.

The Papacy Neglects and Despises the Gospel of Faith.
Roman Catholic Popes Do the Same Thing.
How Are UOJ Popes Spared from This Passage?


Wherefore this doctrine of the schoolmen, with their ceremonies, masses and infinite foundation of the papistical kingdom, are most abominable blasphemies against God, sacrileges and plain denials of Christ, as Peter hath foretold in these words: “There shall be false teachers among you who shall privily bring in damnable heresies.” (2 Peter 2:1) Peter, throughout this chapter, most lively painteth out the papacy--which neglecting and despising the Gospel of faith in Christ--hath taught the work and traditions of men: as
the merit of congruence and worthiness, the difference of days, meats, vows, invocation of saints, pilgrimages, purgatory, and such like.

Martin Luther, Kregel, Galatians 2:15-16, p. 73.

Christians Can Judge All Kinds of Doctrine, When the Teaching Remains Pure


While this doctrine remaineth pure and uncorrupt, Christians are made judges over all kinds of doctrine. They can pronounce sentence against the Pope, that he is condemned with all his kingdom, because he so walketh, and so teacheth that by the merit of congruence we must come to grace, and that afterward by the merit of worthiness we are received into heaven. This, saith the Christian, is not the right way to justify us, neither doth this way lead to heaven. Not by work going before grace, shall I deserve grace, not by my work following grace shall I deserve eternal life; but to him that believeth, sin is pardoned, and righteousness imputeth. This truth, and this confidence, maketh him the child of God, and heir of His Kingdom; for in hope he possesseth already everlasting life, assured unto him by promise. Through faith in Christ therefore all things are given unto us, grace, peace, forgiveness of sins, salvation, and everlasting life, and not for the merit of
congruence and worthiness.

Martin Luther, Kregel, Galatians 2:15-16, p. 72f.

Hunnius on Faith. The UOJ Fanatics Give Themselves Away.
False Gospel and False Faith



narrow-minded has left a new comment on your post "The Biblical View of Faith Contradicts UOJ Claims":

The UOJers claim that they are not pooh-poohing faith, but here it is from the horse's mouth ("Thesis Opposed to Huberianism," by Aegidius Hunnius):

Thesis 39

Huber completely outlaws and eliminates all regard for faith from the act of eternal predestination, and dreams that, in the act of God's electing, people have been elected to salvation in a bare way, without any view toward faith in Christ. From this it is plain that he contends that they have also truly and properly been elected and predestined to eternal life who have never believed on Christ, including those who never will believe for all eternity. For what else is it than to draw men in under the election to salvation whether they believe it or not?

---



narrow-minded has left a new comment on your post "Hunnius on Faith. The UOJ Fanatics Give Themselves...":

I neglected to add "page 23" in my above citation.

While I'm here, this sounds like Walther's Easter Sermon (Above cited source, p. 25):

Thesis 48

Therefore, it is certain that [Huber] does not include a consideration of faith in election per se, but afterwards subordinates faith to, at most, a fruit [in bold] of an election that has already been completed, perfected, and finished by the sole mercy and merit of Christ, made without any consideration of faith. And [Huber] affirms that it is only an effect of election, required for the goal (that is, salvation) to be obtained.

***

GJ - Narrow-minded, you can see what the faculties of the parochial seminaries cannot, for they are united with ELCA in teaching world absolution and calling it grace. Amazing!

Luther Often Beat into Their Minds - Justification by Faith - Not UOJ



When we have thus taught faith in Christ, then do we  also teach good works. Because thou hast laid hold of Christ by faith, through whom thou art made righteous, begin now to work well. Love God and thy neighbours, call upon God, give thanks unto Him, praise Him, confess Him. These are good works indeed, which flow out of this faith, and this cheerfulness conceived in the heart, for that we have remission of sins freely by Christ.


Now what cross or affliction so ever does afterwards ensue, is easily borne, and cheerfully suffered, for Christ’s yoke is easy and His burden is light (St. Matthew 11:30). But when a man walketh in his own righteousness, whatsoever he doth is grievous and tedious unto him, because he doth it unwillingly.

We therefore make this definition of a Christian: a Christian is not he who hath no sin, but he to whom God imputeth not his sin, through faith in Christ. This is why  we so often repeat and beat into your minds, the
forgiveness of sins and imputation of righteousness for Christ’s sake.

Martin Luther, Kregel, Galatians 2:15-16, p. 72.

Send Your Tax-Supported Children to WELS Schools?
To Funny


Do you want to trust your child's education to these people?

2) The dollar figures that Ms. O'Connell present whether right or wrong are way to (sic) high! There is to (sic) much bureaucracy in this system for good results to have a chance. We can do much better;

Nathan Raddatz commented on TwinCities.com.

Retirement Looms in 2013. Premature Celebration Is Premature


I am Social Security and Medicare qualified in 2013. I may delay SS somewhat, but we are on the retirement path anyway - downsizing and relaxing a bit.

Worship services will continue the same as before. After looking at some possibilities, we decided that it was better to emphasize more writing and publishing.

A number of books are being prepared right now. Getting them finished and published requires some concentration.

Broken Arrows from the UOJ Quiver




The Fifth Petition. Large Catechism. The Book of Concord

85] And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.

86] This part now relates to our poor miserable life, which, although we have and believe the Word of God, and do and submit to His will, and are supported by His gifts and blessings, is nevertheless not without sin. For we still stumble daily and transgress because we live in the world among men who do us much harm and give us cause for impatience, anger, revenge, etc. 87] Besides, we have Satan at our back, who sets upon us on every side, and fights (as we have heard) against all the foregoing petitions, so that it is not possible always to stand firm in such a persistent conflict.

88] Therefore there is here again great need to call upon God and to pray: Dear Father, forgive us our trespasses. Not as though He did not forgive sin without and even before our prayer (for He has given us the Gospel, in which is pure forgiveness before we prayed or ever thought about it). But this is to the intent that we may recognize and accept such forgiveness. 89] For since the flesh in which we daily live is of such a nature that it neither trusts nor believes God, and is ever active in evil lusts and devices, so that we sin daily in word and deed, by commission and omission, by which the conscience is thrown into unrest, so that it is afraid of the wrath and displeasure of God, and thus loses the comfort and confidence derived from the Gospel; therefore it is ceaselessly necessary that we run hither and obtain consolation to comfort the conscience again.



***

GJ - The UOJ-spurts want everyone to read the red print and gasp in amazement, "Luther taught UOJ!"

The context, above and below the rubrics, is never quoted. One can find quotations from the fanatics where they claim Luther was just brim-full of UOJ. I remained staggered that so little spilled from the brim, since the Reformer was so full of forgiveness without faith.

The church historians must have made a terrible mistake in saying the theme of the Reformation was justification by faith. They must not have read the same sources.

The comfort offered in this passage from the Large Catechism is similar to many other passages in Luther and the Book of Concord. The blockheads cannot discern this, but anyone else can. The Book of Concord is easy to read, fascinating to study, and always relevant. When a WELS pastor refuses to lead his congregation in a study of the Book of Concord, because it is "boring and irrelevant," one can guess he never read it a single time. But those statements are winners for being selected for the Synodical Council, so the blind can lead the blind into a pit. Very Biblical.

The forgiveness is already there: Christ paid for our sins. Christ redeemed the world. Not for a few little sins, but for great and terrible sins. We see that in the fallen nature of the apostles. Peter denied his own Savior, but he was restored with forgiveness to be an apostle. Paul and Barnabas argued and split. Luther wrote - one of them sinned in some way. These are examples to show us sinfulness and restoration.

Does this Lord's Prayer passage reveal UOJ to us? Not at all, especially if we actually read and study the Book of Concord. Let's just focus on the same author, Luther.




Large Catechism, The Creed

55] Everything, therefore, in the Christian Church is ordered to the end that we shall daily obtain there nothing but the forgiveness of sin through the Word and signs, to comfort and encourage our consciences as long as we live here. Thus, although we have sins, the [grace of the] Holy Ghost does not allow them to injure us, because we are in the Christian Church, where there is nothing but [continuous, uninterrupted] forgiveness of sin, both in that God forgives us, and in that we forgive, bear with, and help each other.

56] But outside of this Christian Church, where the Gospel is not, there is no forgiveness, as also there can be no holiness [sanctification]. Therefore all who seek and wish to merit holiness [sanctification], not through the Gospel and forgiveness of sin, but by their works, have expelled and severed themselves [from this Church].


Large Catechism, The Creed
38] For neither you nor I could ever know anything of Christ, or believe on Him, and obtain Him for our Lord, unless it were offered to us and granted to our hearts by the Holy Ghost through the preaching of the Gospel. The work is done and accomplished; for Christ has acquired and gained the treasure for us by His suffering, death, resurrection, etc. But if the work remained concealed so that no one knew of it, then it would be in vain and lost. That this treasure, therefore, might not lie buried, but be appropriated and enjoyed, God has caused the Word to go forth and be proclaimed, in which He gives the Holy Ghost to bring this treasure home and appropriate it to us. 39] Therefore sanctifying is nothing else than bringing us to Christ to receive this good, to which we could not attain of ourselves.


Large Catechism, Holy Baptism 
84] For this reason let every one esteem his Baptism as a daily dress in which he is to walk constantly, that he may ever be found in the faith and its fruits, that he suppress the old man and grow up in the new. 85] For if we would be Christians, we must practise the work whereby we are Christians. 86] But if any one fall away from it, let him again come into it. For just as Christ, the Mercy-seat, does not recede from us or forbid us to come to Him again, even though we sin, so all His treasure and gifts also remain. If, therefore, we have once in Baptism obtained forgiveness of sin, it will remain every day, as long as we live, that is, as long as we carry the old man about our neck.

Large Catechism, Sacrament of the Altar
31] Therefore also it is vain talk when they say that the body and blood of Christ are not given and shed for us in the Lord's Supper, hence we could not have forgiveness of sins in the Sacrament. For although the work is accomplished and the forgiveness of sins acquired on the cross, yet it cannot come to us in any other way than through the Word. For what would we otherwise know about it, that such a thing was accomplished or was to be given us if it were not presented by preaching or the oral Word? Whence do they know of it, or how can they apprehend and appropriate to themselves the forgiveness, except they lay hold of and believe the Scriptures and the Gospel? 32] But now the entire Gospel and the article of the Creed: I believe a holy Christian Church, the forgiveness of sin, etc., are by the Word embodied in this Sacrament and presented to us. Why, then, should we allow this treasure to be torn from the Sacrament when they must confess that these are the very words which we hear every where in the Gospel, and they cannot say that these words in the Sacrament are of no use, as little as they dare say that the entire Gospel or Word of God, apart from the Sacrament, is of no use?

Large Catechism, Sacrament of the Altar
70] But those who are sensible of their weakness, desire to be rid of it and long for help, should regard and use it only as a precious antidote against the poison which they have in them. For here in the Sacrament you are to receive from the lips of Christ forgiveness of sin, which contains and brings with it the grace of God and the Spirit with all His gifts, protection, shelter, and power against death and the devil and all misfortune.

Large Catechism, Third Commandment
100] For let me tell you this, even though you know it perfectly and be already master in all things, still you are daily in the dominion of the devil, who ceases neither day nor night to steal unawares upon you, to kindle in your heart unbelief and wicked thoughts against the foregoing and all the commandments. Therefore you must always have God's Word in your heart, upon your lips, and in your ears. But where the heart is idle, and the Word does not sound, he breaks in and has done the damage before we are aware. 101] On the other hand, such is the efficacy of the Word, whenever it is seriously contemplated, heard, and used, that it is bound never to be without fruit, but always awakens new understanding, pleasure, and devoutness, and produces a pure heart and pure thoughts. For these words are not inoperative or dead, but creative, living words. 102] And even though no other interest or necessity impel us, yet this ought to urge every one thereunto, because thereby the devil is put to Right and driven away, and, besides, this commandment is fulfilled, and [this exercise in the Word] is more pleasing to God than any work of hypocrisy, however brilliant.




***

GJ - This selection identifies any UOJ advocate as a dolt, a lunkhead, a lazy-bones who cannot understand anything in context, but must invent reasons to turn things upside-down.

The UOJ Enthusiasts have been causing confusion everywhere for the last decades, especially in WELS. I suggested that the sect should study the Book of Concord. Instead, they dig into their Holy of Holies, the WELS Essay Files, and prove their case with their parochial parodies of Christian doctrine.

The last I looked, out of sheer boredom,  the Holy of Holies contained essays by a known atheist (but one of their own) and the chairman of the first gay Lutheran seminary (but one of their own) unless we count Mequon as first. Offended? Two words - mattress room.