http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2013/01/the-witch-hunt-has-officially-begun.html#comment-form
While I have no spoon in this soup, I would simply like, with respect for all involved, to say that if a church body has determined for itself a doctrinal position and has chosen persons and processes for assuring that members of the church body in fact adhere to those doctrinal positions, it should come as no surprise when a person who has been removed from said church body and still is running a blog site involving members of his former church body causes those members to come under suspicion of sharing in that person's positions.
I can't see how, as a matter of principle, the actions of the WELS Council of Presidents can be faulted.
It seems only natural that the WELS would wish to assure itself that those who participate on this forum do not share in the opinions and positions of the person who was recently removed from the WELS.
And if they do, would they not also be duty bound to leave the WELS and find their church fellowship elsewhere?
I can't see how, as a matter of principle, the actions of the WELS Council of Presidents can be faulted.
It seems only natural that the WELS would wish to assure itself that those who participate on this forum do not share in the opinions and positions of the person who was recently removed from the WELS.
And if they do, would they not also be duty bound to leave the WELS and find their church fellowship elsewhere?
GJ - Someone asked, "Uncle Waldo, are you preparing someone to replace you?" Apparently, the answer was, "Yes!"
The new Waldo Werning has emerged, ready to fight for false doctrine wherever he can insert his quivering, insecure ego.
Paul McCain, no longer welcome at ALPB or LutherQuest, plops down on the Intrepid Lutherans blog to rekindle the fire built to roast Pastor Paul McCain.
In spite of his pious claims to the contrary, McCain was quick to hail Rydecki's expulsion from WELS.
Apart from papal romances, McCain's only dogma is UOJ.
