 At a news conference at the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels, Esther Miller, 54, holding photos of other victims, breaks down while talking about being abused by a Catholic priest when she was a young girl. (Irfan Khan, Los Angeles Times / February 1, 2013) |
By Victoria Kim, Ashley Powers and Harriet Ryan, Los Angeles TimesFebruary 1, 2013, 6:28 p.m.
The archdiocese of Los Angeles learned in the late 1970s that one of its priests had sexually assaulted a 16-year-old boy so violently that he was left bleeding and “in a state of shock.” The priest said he was too drunk to remember what happened and officials took no further action.
But two decades later, word reached Cardinal Roger M. Mahony that the same priest was molesting again and improperly performing the sacrament of confession on his victim. The archdiocese sprang to action: It dispatched investigators, interviewed a raft of witnesses and discussed the harshest of all church penalties—not for the abuse but for the violation of church law.
“Given the seriousness of this abuse of the sacrament of penance … it is your responsibility to formally declare the existence of the excommunication and then refer the matter to Rome,” one cleric told Mahony in a memo.
The case of Father Jose Ugarte is one of several instances detailed in newly released records in which archdiocese officials displayed outrage over a priest’s ecclesiastical missteps while doing little for the victims of his sexual abuse.
'via Blog this'
