The Glory Has Departed

Bethany Lutheran Hymnal Blog


Bethany Lutheran Videos at Each Live Worship Service

Lutheran Books from G. Jackson, Christian Art from Norma A. Boeckler

Alec Satin's Free Online Lutheran Library

We use The Lutheran Hymnal and the KJV

Free PDF -> Understanding Luther's Galatians

Free PDF The King James Version: Apostolic Texts, Precise Translation versus Fraudulent Texts and Heretical Translations.

email: greg.jackson.edlp@gmail.com.

Navigation for Luther's Sermons, Lenker Edition

 

Trinitarian Bible Society


“The Authorised Version translators continued in the textual tradition which the church had used and accepted for hundreds of years. In doing so, they continued the solidarity of both original language texts and also of earlier English translations upon which they based their work.”

The Authorised Version: What Today’s Christian Needs to Know about the Authorised (King James) Version, 2012, p. 2.

Monday, November 11, 2013

Because I Could Not Find a Box of Rocks Picture

SpenerQuest is full of celebrity theologians.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Franz Linden (Franz_mann)
Senior Member
Username: Franz_mann

Post Number: 1795
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Sunday, November 10, 2013 - 10:36 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post


Bret Meyer writes:

Dr. Lito Cruz, "UOJers should realise that they share something in common with Calvinists, they share with them of lumping the Atonement with Justification as one and the same event." 

This is nonsense! UOJ does not treat the atonement with justification as one and the same event. The atonement was necessary for the justification to take place. They aren't the same event, but they necessarily go together, like heads and tails on a coin.

It is the deniers of UOJ that are the Calvinists, because they drive a wedge between the atonement and justification, trying to separate heads from tails, as it were. They give a passing nod to the atonement, but the thing they really crave is justification, as though it could be obtained for us in any other way than the atonement that was made for the sins of all on the cross.

If you ask them how they can be certain that their sins are forgiven by God and that they stand justified, what answer can they give? They can't point to the cross, because they have already debased that act by their theology that so as to deny that it is a guarantee of their justification. Instead, they point to the Means of Grace, as if the Means of Grace do anything other than deliver to the sinner the very same forgiveness that was obtained by Christ at the cross for the sins of all.

This is Calvinist theology. It's been repudiated again and again by faithful preachers of the Gospel. Alas, it must continue to be repudiated until the end of time. Sometimes I wonder if Calvin might not be the AntiChrist. He's got almost as many people believing the same lie as the papacy.

Franz

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Daniel Gorman (Heinrich)
Senior Member
Username: Heinrich

Post Number: 2048
Registered: 11-2004
Posted on Monday, November 11, 2013 - 12:04 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post


Rev. David R. Boisclair: "Mr. Gorman, the anonymous pastor is Rev. Paul A. Rydecki, formerly a pastor of the WELS. He was removed from the ministerium of WELS for the false doctrine of denying the biblical doctrine of Objective Justification."

Could you provide a link to an official WELS website that states that Rev. Rydecki was removed for "the false doctrine of denying the biblical doctrine of Objective Justification"? As far as I can tell, WELS has never publicly released the reasons for Rev. Rydecki's removal, the evidence against him, or any information on how he was tried and convicted.

ELDONA says that the pastor in question was removed because his statements were considered "inadequate" because they did not fully express certain formulations demanded by the church body. ELDONA may have based this opinion on Rev. Rydecki's public after-the-fact account of his trial and removal. If so, ELDONA should footnote Rev. Rydecki's account. ELDONA should ask WELS to verify the accuracy of Rev. Rydecki's account and then document WELS's response or lack of response.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Doug Andersen (Lutherman)
Intermediate Member
Username: Lutherman

Post Number: 357
Registered: 6-2006
Posted on Monday, November 11, 2013 - 12:35 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post


The WELS never acknowledges why they kick out pastors let alone document the reasons...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

George Mueller (Mueller)
Senior Member
Username: Mueller

Post Number: 1055
Registered: 11-2012
Posted on Monday, November 11, 2013 - 8:05 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

That the WELS has treated pastors unfairly does not mean that Rydecki was treated unfairly. Rydecki taught false doctrine and the WELS removed him for doing so. The WELS was right to kick him out. [GJ - Reading SpenerQuest is like being stuck in a locked ward. Let me out!]
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

George Mueller (Mueller)
Senior Member
Username: Mueller

Post Number: 1056
Registered: 11-2012
Posted on Monday, November 11, 2013 - 8:22 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Who is Dr. Lito Cruz? Is he a Lutheran? It doesn't sound like it. Lutherans, no less than Calvinists, teach the intensive perfection of the atonement. Is he denying that we do? [GJ - Who is GM? Is he really Rolf Preus? He knows as much as Rolf does!]