Sunday, March 17, 2013

Hoenecke in the Hands of WELS

Glorified in His Passion, by Dr. Adolf Hoenecke
Published in 1957 - the UOJ erosion was already being established.
This volume is no longer sold by NPH.

LPC has left a new comment on your post "Pastor Paul Rydecki - Excellent Hoenecke Sermon on...":

Dr. Greg,

Agree wholeheartedly.

The sermon indeed is ambiguous enough to be massaged by UOJers to their advantage.

LPC

***

GJ - Since WELS was already changing the Gausewitz Catechism and slithering into UOJ, I have to question the integrity of the publication. Who knows how much it was edited to please the growing UOJ faction?

As one reader said, part three is missing or truncated.

No one practices unionism more Enthusiastically than Carl's son John,
a Church and Change leader.
---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "Hoenecke in the Hands of WELS":

I think it is not that realistic to assume that Hoenecke will not cower to UOJ when pressed.


LPC

***

GJ - Editing is an interesting consideration. I wrote a dissertation, which was edited down by one person. That was edited again. At one point we had a footnote with no content. I could not even tell where it went, and the main editor (Harvard PhD) could not either.

Rolf and Daniel Preus edited their father's last book. The sons are fanatics for UOJ, but they left many gems against UOJ in the book. Each anti-UOJ quotation demolishes the case for Knapp-Stephan-Walther. Besides that, there is no UOJ statement in Justification and Rome.

The Storm-Brownies assume that justification almost always means justification without faith, because they imagine their precious UOJ dogma is the real Gospel. The rest is - you gotta believe UOJ. They call that Subjective Justification!

But justification in Preus' last book exclusively means justification by faith alone. And by exclusively, I mean UOJ does not survive the scrutiny of Robert Preus, in spite of the editing done by his sons.

Back to Hoenecke. All we know for sure about this book is this - that WELS published it while the sect was abandoning traditional Lutheran doctrine for the magic of UOJ. The march toward Universalism and consorting with ELCA has been slow but inexorable. They had no trouble "improving Gausewitz" and later abandoning their modified version for Kuske's UOJ picture book.


St. Patrick's Breastplate - I Bind Unto Myself Today



---


The Prayer of St. Patrick

 

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Judica Sunday - John 8:46-59.Before Abraham Was, I...":

 The Prayer of St. Patrick as sung by the Cambridge Singers, directed by John Rutter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6wp1B16HuQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Judica Sunday - John 8:46-59.
Before Abraham Was, I AM












Judica Sunday, The Fifth Sunday in Lent, 2013


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn #12                 This Day                                         4:80  
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #40            The God of Abram Praise                         4:94 

The Great I AM

The Communion Hymn #305:1-5            Soul Adorn Thyself             4:23
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #410               Jesus Lead Thou On                   4:27

KJV Hebrews 9:11 But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building; 12 Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us. 13 For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh: 14 How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God? 15 And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.

KJV John 8:46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me? 47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God. 48 Then answered the Jews, and said unto him, Say we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil? 49 Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishonour me. 50 And I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth. 51 Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death. 52 Then said the Jews unto him, Now we know that thou hast a devil. Abraham is dead, and the prophets; and thou sayest, If a man keep my saying, he shall never taste of death. 53 Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? and the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself? 54 Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God: 55 Yet ye have not known him; but I know him: and if I should say, I know him not, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know him, and keep his saying. 56 Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad. 57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? 58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. 59 Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.

Prayer
O Lord Jesus Christ, we thank Thee, that of Thine infinite mercy Thou hast instituted this Thy sacrament, in which we eat Thy body and drink Thy blood: Grant us, we beseech Thee, by Thy Holy Spirit, that we may not receive this gift unworthily, but that we may confess our sins, remember Thine agony and death, believe the forgiveness of sin, and day by day grow in faith and love, until we obtain eternal salvation through Thee, who livest and reignest with the Father and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

The Great I AM


KJV John 8:46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me? 47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.

There are several keys to understanding the Bible as the Word of God. Many use that phrase, Word of God, but they do not grasp its meaning – or they reject its meaning.

Apart from inerrant and infallible, inspired by the Holy Spirit – all true – is an important characteristic of the Scriptures:
The Scriptures are consistent. People say, “The passages contain no contradictions,” which is entirely true, but do they carry that out in their explanations? No.

To be treated as consistent, each verse must be seen as linked with all the others, all having the same purpose. The Bible is not subject to man’s logic. The Bible judges all other books, because the Bible is the only book written by God.
It is not reasonable, as man judges reason, because it is the revelation of God and is far above man’s thinking, as Isaiah 55 says so clearly. This is also stated by Paul – who is God’s counselor? (Many are self-appointed counselors and they are the worst kind.)

KJV Romans 11:33 O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out! 34 For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counsellor?

The Bible has one consistent purpose, to teach us faith in Christ. No book of the Bible teaches that better than the Fourth Gospel, where the noun and verb for faith and believe (the same root in Greek) are found so often. In John’s Gospel we have the apostle whom Jesus loved, the one closest to Jesus, revealing His sermons and discussions. These are ideal because they show us so much more in addition to the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke.

The reason for teaching us faith in Christ is to give us forgiveness of sin.

KJV John 8:46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe Me?

This is the big question – what is sin and how can someone be forgiven? We could say either convince or convict or accuse. The Pharisaical understanding was opposed to the Old Testament Scriptures (and still is), which promised the Messiah and taught faith in Him. The wrong description of sin began with doing something wrong.

Jesus’ definition begins with faith or unfaith. Not believing in Him is a sin.

When sin begins as a work of man, then his actions are defined as sin or not sin, depending on what he does or does not do. That is the righteousness of the law, and it did not stop with the Pharisees. I have heard many people define their righteousness as being born in a given synod (wise choice!), being descended from people well known in their sect (but no other), or by never doing something terrible (like questioning the synod’s wisdom).

When righteousness is the righteousness of the law, there is always in impulse to prove it and to hide any possible manifestations of sin. That is why “dry” towns will have various ways to get liquor to people so no one officially notices. One little temperance town had taxis delivering paper bags to homes. They had no need for taxis, but they did not want to be spotted in the liquor store (a sin) while pretending was a virtue. Likewise, Benton County was “dry” for having no liquor sales at all, but every restaurant had a bar and promoted that profitable trade.

So Jesus and His disciples were sinners because He let them “work” on the Sabbath when they pulled grain from crops and ate them to ease their hunger.

There are massive regulations about the definition of work in Judaism, and when that happens, the idea of faith is displaced entirely.

Jesus defines sin as “not believing in Me.”

He said in John 6 that the “work of God” is

KJV John 6:28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? 29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on Him whom He hath sent.

And

KJV John 16:8 And when He is come, He will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: 9 Of sin, because they believe not on Me; 10 Of righteousness [GJ – justification by faith], because I go to my Father, and ye see Me no more;

47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.

One verse clearly follows the other. Jesus divides according to faith or unfaith, because the Scriptures teach the righteousness of faith, not the righteousness of law.

If we apply the righteousness of the law to ourselves, we are condemned, because no one can live up to any law, whether Mosaic, or custom, or personal.

The righteousness of faith means that God declares those who believe in His Son forgiven of all their sin.

As long as anyone is an unbeliever, he cannot hear or grasp God’s Word. It is alien. The work of the Holy Spirit in the Word plants faith in the heart. And there are many approaches, many examples to find in the entire Bible. One will take root. That faith is God’s work.

48 Then answered the Jews, and said unto him, Say we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil? 49 Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishonour Me. 50 And I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth. 51 Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep My saying, he shall never see death.

Jesus’ words caused an instant antagonistic response, as they do today. Jesus was devilish and a Samaritan (not one of us).

The result was a clear definition of salvation. If a man keeps My saying, he will live forever.

Faith in Him is forgiveness of sin. Forgiveness is salvation and eternal life.

To promise forgiveness and salvation without faith in Jesus is utter blasphemy, but a certain group of false teachers in Synodical Conference glorify themselves for teaching this falsehood.

52 Then said the Jews unto him, Now we know that thou hast a devil. Abraham is dead, and the prophets; and thou sayest, If a man keep my saying, he shall never taste of death. 53 Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? and the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself?

The Gospel Promises cause hatred and division. We can be sure that some among the leaders were converted, but we hear from the opponents first. Ministers are often told by denominational leaders that they should not upset anyone.

Jesus, knowing his audience, deliberately antagonized them by teaching the truth that hurt them the most. As Luther observed, He was not crucified for His miracles or His life, but for teaching that righteousness came from the outside, from faith in Him, not from the inside, from the works of man.

So they brought up Abraham and the prophets, who were dead. This really assumes the very essence of the New Testament. The Torah and the Prophets taught faith in Jesus, which means eternal life for all those teachers. They taught the Gospel. The opponents said, knowing what He meant, and rejecting it – they are all dead! And how can You even imply it. You are not greater than they were. Who do you think you are?

This articulated what Jesus wanted to say. It set up one of the great sayings in the Bible.
 

First He added to their pain –

54 Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that He is your God: 55 Yet ye have not known Him; but I know Him: and if I should say, I know Him not, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know Him, and keep His saying. 56 Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day: and he saw it, and was glad.

This duality strengthens the concept of faith and unfaith: honor and dishonor. We honor what we trust. If we distrust, we dishonor. Jesus is sent from the Father, so the Father honors the Son and the Son honors the Father.

The opponents talk about God all the time, but they have not known Him because they do not believe His Word. Because of unbelief, they do not keep His Word.

But in contrast, Abraham saw the day of Christ coming – he rejoiced, he was glad. (He was justified by faith.)

John 8 and Romans 4 and Genesis 15 all teach the same thing. They are consistent. They teach justification by faith alone.

57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? 58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. 59 Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.

The I AM

Here is a reference to Moses and the Burning Bush, which had two natures, like Christ. It was burning and yet not consumed. The Angel of the Lord, speaking from the Burning Bush, is God. “I am the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.”

I AM does not mean- it’s me, but I AM God. What was God’s name, Moses asked. The Angel said, “Tell them I AM sent you.”

Naturally, when the opponents realized they were speaking to the Son of God, they all began to listen.

No?

They picked up stones to murder Him.

And here is the clear teaching of His two natures. He is a man speaking to them and yet He exists before Abraham. Then, when they sought to murder Him, He passed right through them. His divine nature was not limited by His human nature – which helps us see how it is that Holy Communion represents the same association – the earthly elements and the Body and Blood of Christ.


 Quotations

"These two every preacher should show:  first, an innocent life, with which he may boldly face the world, and no one may have cause to blaspheme his doctrine; secondly, irreproachable doctrine, so that he may mislead no one of those who follow him."
            What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis:  Concordia Publishing House, 1959, III,  p. 1111.  John 8: 46, 59.                  

"For if I perish, no great harm is done; but if I let God's Word perish, and I remain silent, then I do harm to God and to the whole world."
            Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids:  Baker Book House, 1983, II,  p. 176. Fifth Sunday in Lent John 8:46‑59.  

"Christ is speaking here not of the word of the law, but of the Gospel, which is a discourse about Christ, who died for our sins, etc.  For God did not wish to impart Christ to the world in any other way; he had to embody him in the Word and thus distributed him, and present him to everybody; otherwise Christ would have existed for himself alone and remained unknown to us; he would have thus died for himself.  But since the Word places before us Christ, it thus places us before him who has triumphed over death, sin, and Satan.  Therefore, he who grasps and retains Christ, has thus also eternal deliverance from death. Consequently it is a Word of life, and it is true, that whoever keeps the Word shall never see death."
            Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids:  Baker Book House, 1983, II,  p. 177. John 8:46‑59.         

"Scripture therefore uses these words, 'We are justified by faith,' to teach both: 1) What the reason (or merit) for justification is, or what the blessings of Christ are; to wit, that through and for the sake of Christ alone we are granted forgiveness of sins, righteousness and eternal life; and 2. How
these should be applied or transferred to us; namely, by embracing the promise and relying on Christ by faith alone."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith (1568), p. 107.

"What is the difference between Christianity and paganism? Paganism has no sure Word of God and no true faith in Christ. It is unsettled. In place of the one true God, pagans worship various factitious deities and countless idols with ceremonies, works and sacrifices selected according to human judgment. They imagine that they compensate for their sins with this worship, pacify their gods and make them gracious and purchase, as it were, blessings from them."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith, (1568), p. 19.

"What is the reason for certainty in Christian doctrine?...7. the hatred of the devil over against this doctrine;
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith, (1568), p. 21.

"Creation is the external action of God by which God, seeing all other things, visible and invisible, fashioned them out of nothing with this plan of His that He might establish for Himself an eternal Church to acknowledge and praise Him and in which He might dwell forever."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith, (1568), p. 45.

"The good angels are spiritual beings, created in the beginning after the image of God; that is, they are intelligent, truthful, just and free. They are not part of another species or the souls of people; and they are immortal, ordained by God to praise Him and to be servants of the Church and protectors of the devout, Hebrews 1, Psalm 34, Psalm 103, and Psalm 104."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith, (1568), p. 47. Hebrews 1; Psalm 34; Psalm 103; Psalm 104

"There are eight sins which militate against faith: 1. Epicurean and Academic doubts about God, His providence and the certainty of the doctrine handed down through Christ and the Apostles. 2. A lack of faith toward God. 3. In regard to the forgiveness of sins, to entertain doubts as to whether we are in the grace of God or if we please God. 4. Despair. 5. Stubbornness of presumption. 6. Confidence in human aids. 7. Superstition. 8. Witchcraft."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith, (1568), p. 65f.

"The sins which militate against the Third Commandment are the profanation of the Sabbath through neglect and contempt of the ministry, through Judaic and superstitious observance of the Sabbath, or through a shifting of the ministry into the kingdom of this world. The faithfulness of those who teach is the virtue by which the ministers of the Church, aware of their modest skill in Christian doctrine, carefully and zealousy discharge and steadfastly protect all the duties of the faithful dispenser of the mysteries of God in teaching, debating, comforting and setting their hearers an example of true devotion and of all the virtues. The other extreme are faithlessness, heedless teaching or negligence in office, or deserting the ministry because of excessive anxiety or concern over one's own weakness."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith, (1568), p. 71f.

Saturday, March 16, 2013

LCMS in Bed with ELCA for Malaria Fund, Plus the Disaster of Vouchers

Malaria? He has berry-berry.


bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Mary Thompson -- Wrong Turn on the Road to School":

Vouchers are one of the worst ideas to hit the church, and I'll explain why in a moment. First, think about the malaria project of the LCMS and ELCA and Ted Turner. Turner would only fork out $75 million for Africa if the synods matched the funds. What a better way of voluntarily draining the church of funds! It's the modern day equivalent of Charles the VII liquidating the monasteries, the French Revolution liquidating the RCC in France, or the Austrian empire liquidating the contemplating monasteries under Emperor Joseph. It's getting the church to do what the UN ought to be doing with nations that commit tax monies to the UN projects. That's similar to Harrison's Mercy Journeys giving away money to disaster victims without preaching the gospel to the recipients. Why not let FEMA or the UN do that? The church ought not do any charity in a secular manner, but must always pair charity with a sermon at least. Two days after the victims receive money, they probably don't even remember what the LCMS or WELS acronyms stand for!

So the reason the vouchers are bad is they are always worth less than what it costs to teach the students. So the state is saying that the church schools can teach public school students, but must pay $2,000 or more per student for the privilege. Furthermore, the school cannot force any pupil to hear the gospel while in school, but must allow them to opt out of chapel, and nothing can be said in the classroom! Anyway, Jeske's school has drained the Lutheran churches' coffers, and this has contributed to the high price of tuition in WELS and LCMS schools, and the great student loan debt of WLC students and LCMS students in the state. Moreover, not much is sent to the LCMS seminaries from WI to aid WI seminary students.

ELCA's Luther Seminary - Too Big To Fail?

"A blessing for Ichabod in this program?
Oh yes, Gracious Heavenly Father,
bless and keep Ichabod
far away from us."
---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "ELCA's Luther Seminary - Too Big To Fail?":

Wow look at the gigantic crucifix on Rev. Wilken, is he trying to say he is more spiritual by that?

Looks like he is wearing the large one to ward off Evangelicals.

LPC

---

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "ELCA's Luther Seminary - Too Big To Fail?":

In the pics with McCain, Weedon et al (above), I notice the large crucifix that Wilken is wearing on a neck chain appear to be made to mount on a wall. I guess he didn't read the label on the package at CPH.

***

GJ - Processional crosses were on sale at Fortress, Bruce and Lito.

---

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "ELCA's Luther Seminary - Too Big To Fail?":

Lito, your comment wasn't posted (hadn't been approved) when I made my comment, so we both thought the same thing independently about one particular detail of this post, which is very coincidental considering how info-laden this particular post was.

"I am so glad I could rig the baby-cam
so I could watch kitty playing while I'm gone."

"My new app counts carbs for me,
and has The Catholic Encyclopedia as the home page for Internet Explorer."

http://www.ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2012/12/richard-bliese-resigns-as-president-of.html


bruce-church said...

I like how the Luther Sem president had to leave after the seminary lost a mere $4 million, but for years student debt has been rising, and that was a-o-kay with the seminary regents.

====

http://www.startribune.com/183099441.html?refer=y

School announces search for new president after losing nearly $4 million last school year.

=========

http://www.luthersem.edu/about/quickfacts.aspx

Tuition and living expenses
$15,000 annually for full-time study
$32,870* annually for full-time study, living expenses and books
*Reflects cost for students living on campus and reflects the 2012-13 academic year

Student debt
31% graduate without seminary debt
69% graduate with seminary debt
Median indebtedness is $42,279
Financial information is current as of October 2012 and is based upon the 2012-13 fiscal year.
bruce-church said...

The only candidate left for the Luther Seminary presidency resigns after it is revealed in the student newspaper that's he's a LCMS member. Could that be because many Luther Seminary M.Div. students looking to go into the ministry are women. 46% of the seminary students are women, and they only have a small music ministry program there, so one can guess most of them are ministerial students. Moreover, the big fad on campus there is multiculturalism and anti-racism. Also, one seminary student was a Lutheran pastor who has conducted numerous same-sex marriages in the past, and even wrote a letter to the new pope about the subject in 2010:

http://steadfastlutherans.org/?p=28005

===========

http://www.luthersem.edu/about/quickfacts.aspx
Male/female enrollment

54% male
46% female

============

Students cultivate anti-racist, multicultural identities:

http://www.luthersem.edu/gmi/newsletter/article.aspx?article_id=92&issue_id=11

==============

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2013/03/14/mn-man-has-papal-connection-over-hot-button-issue/

Now studying at Luther Seminary, [Andrew] Albertsen sent an email from St. Paul when Bergoglio made harsh statements about gay marriage in 2010.

“I told him whenever you say something about gay marriage, think about that you are also issuing a judgment about me,” Albertsen said.

============

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blessing_of_same-sex_unions_in_Christian_churches#cite_note-24

Argentina: The Danish Church in Buenos Aires performs marriages between same-sex couples.[24]

Footnote 24: 2 June 2010).

"A church blesses gay couples who want to give themselves to God. La Nacion (Buenos Aires). Retrieved 25 July 2012. "However, not all Protestant churches have the same position. Such is the case of the Danish Lutherans, whose temples are blessed unions of same-sex couples and from which it is supported gay marriage in Argentina. in fact, in Buenos Aires, Roberto Pastor Andrew Albertsen, held in a five religious civil unions between same-sex and hopes to do the same with the marriage, if they are enabled in civil matters. "

===============

http://www.normaboecklerart.com


***
Robert Jenson, ELCA apostate.
He longs to pope.
 GJ -

 PS on Robert Jenson, Luther College, once conservative:


Robert Jenson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lutheranism
Lutherrose.svg
Luther's Rose
 Lutheranism portal
Robert W. Jenson (born 1930, Eau Claire, Wisconsin) is a leading American Lutheran andecumenical theologian.

Contents

  [hide

[edit]Student years

Jenson studied classics and philosophy at Luther College in the late 1940s, before beginning theological studies at Luther Seminary in 1951. Due to a car accident he missed most of his first-year seminary studies, and during that year he immersed himself in the works of Kant and Kierkegaard. Jenson began reading historical-critical scholars like Hermann Gunkel and Sigmund Mowinckel, and as a result he became deeply interested in the biblical texts and in the theological significance of the Old Testament.
At Luther Seminary, Jenson was assistant to the renowned orthodox Lutheran theologian, Herman Preus. Preus infused Jenson with an admiration for the theology of post-Reformation Lutheran scholasticism, and with a strong belief in the orthodox Lutheran understanding of predestination. Against the majority of the staff at Luther Seminary at that time, who believed that God elected individuals to salvation on the basis of "foreseen faith", Preus held that God had decreed the salvation of a definite number of the elect, without a decree of reprobation. Other influences at Luther Seminary included Edmund Smits, who introduced Jenson to the work of Augustine, and fellow-student Gerhard Forde, who introduced him to the work of Rudolf Bultmann. While studying at seminary, Jenson also met and married Blanche Rockne, who became one of the major stimuli for his theological work (one of his later books includes a dedication to Blanche, "the mother of all my theology"[1]).
After seminary, Jenson taught in the department of religion and philosophy at Luther College from 1955 to 1957, before moving toHeidelberg for doctoral studies in 1957-58. Though he had planned to write his dissertation on Bultmann, his supervisor, Peter Brunner, advised him to work on Karl Barth's doctrine of election. Thus Jenson worked on Barth's theology at Heidelberg, and he also studied nineteenth-century German theology and philosophy, partly with the help of the new Heidelberg lecturer, Wolfhart Pannenberg. He also attended a seminar there with Martin Heidegger (and, during a later visit to Heidelberg, with Hans-Georg Gadamer). Even more significantly, at Heidelberg he became friends with another young Lutheran scholar, Carl Braaten, who would later become his "chief theological companion"[2] and his most important theological collaborator.

[edit]Early career

Jenson's doctoral dissertation (revised and published in 1963 as Alpha and Omega) was completed in Basel, with Barth's approval, and so Jenson returned to Luther College, where he continued to study Barth while also developing an increasing interest in the philosophy of Hegel. The faculty of the religion department was uncomfortable with Jenson's theological liberalism, and his openness to biblical criticism and evolutionary biology was strongly condemned. When the college failed to force Jenson's retirement, several professors from the religion and biology departments resigned in protest. From 1960 to 1966, Jenson was thus left with the task of helping to rebuild an entire religion department, and he became especially involved in the development of a new philosophy department.[3] During these years, he also wrote A Religion against Itself (1967), which sharply critiqued the American religious culture of the 1960s.
Jenson finally left Luther College to spend three years as Dean and Tutor of Lutheran Studies at Mansfield CollegeOxford University.[4]Here he was able to focus for the first time on teaching theology, and he was deeply influenced by his encounters with Anglicanism and with ecumenical worship. The three years at Oxford marked a creative and productive period in Jenson's career. In The Knowledge of Things Hoped For (1969), he sought to integrate the traditions of European hermeneutics and English analytical philosophy, while also drawing on patristic and medieval theologians such as Origen and Thomas Aquinas. And in God after God (1969), he sought to go beyond the "death of God" theology by emphasizing the actualism and futurity of God's being. The proposal advanced in God after Godwas in many respects parallel to the new "theology of hope" that was being developed at the time in Germany by young scholars likeJürgen Moltmann and Wolfhart Pannenberg. At Oxford, Jenson also supervised the doctoral work of Colin Gunton, who went on to become one of Great Britain's most distinguished and influential systematic theologians.
From Oxford, Jenson returned to America in 1968 and took up a position at the Lutheran Seminary in Gettysburg. His work here focused in part on distinctively Lutheran themes, especially in the books Lutheranism (1976) and Visible Words (1978). He also began to engage deeply with patristic thought (especially with Gregory of NyssaCyril of Alexandria, and Maximus the Confessor), which led him to develop a creative new proposal for trinitarian theology in The Triune Identity (1982).
Further, as a result of his encounter with Anglicanism at Oxford, Jenson was appointed to the first round of Lutheran-Episcopal ecumenical dialogue in 1968. This was the beginning of his long involvement with the ecumenical movement, which would deeply shape his later theology. With George Lindbeck, he became involved in the Roman Catholic-Lutheran dialogue; and in 1988, he spent time at the Institute for Ecumenical Research at Strasbourg. Throughout his career, Jenson's theology continued to move in an increasingly Catholic, conservative and ecumenical direction. He interacted extensively with the work of Catholic theologians like Joseph Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI) and Hans Urs von Balthasar, and with Eastern Orthodox theologians like Maximus the ConfessorJohn Zizioulas and Vladimir Lossky.

[editLater career

After two decades of teaching at Lutheran Theological Seminary in Gettysburg, Jenson moved in 1988 to the religion department of St. Olaf College in Northfield, Minnesota. He was joined in Northfield by his friend Carl Braaten, and together they founded the conservative Center for Catholic and Evangelical Theology[5] in 1991. The founding of this Center marked a new period of intensive ecumenical involvement for Jenson: with Braaten, he organized numerous ecumenical conferences, and began publishing the theological journal Pro Ecclesia.
Jenson continued to teach at St. Olaf College until 1998, when he retired and took up a position as Senior Scholar for Research at the Center for Theological Inquiry[6] in Princeton, New Jersey. Before leaving St. Olaf College, he completed work on his magnum opus, the two-volume Systematic Theology (1997–99), which has since been widely regarded as one of the most important and creative recent works of systematic theology. In a review of this work, Wolfhart Pannenberg described Jenson as "one of the most original and knowledgeable theologians of our time".[7]
Jenson currently resides in Princeton, NJ.

SEPARATION FROM THE UNGODLY WORLD : Apprising Ministries



SEPARATION FROM THE UNGODLY WORLD : Apprising Ministries:

"As a reader of Apprising Ministries, no doubt you’ll see that I often point you to teachings written by men who lived in the 1800′s of before. There’s a very simple reason; I’m a pastor who adhere’s to Biblical Christianity.

Since the man-centered spiritual Trojan Horse of the neo-liberal cult of the Emerging Church was embraced and unloaded within mainstream evangelicalism circa 1997, you’re hearing less and less about the genuine Christian Faith."

'via Blog this'