Wednesday, February 3, 2016

Response to The Faith of Jesus: Against the Faithless Lutherans.
If You Want a Free Color Copy, Find Some New Typos

Luther paraphrased Paul, Galatians 1:10.


Dear Dr. Jackson,

I just received my copy from Amazon of The Faith of Jesus and devoured it over two days.  Once again you have produced another thorough book that absolutely crushes the UOJ doctrine.  It is certainly rare to read a theologian that writes with fire and this is also why I’ve enjoyed your work over the years. 

As I’ve mentioned to you in the past, it certainly has opened my eyes to the works of the Reformers, Luther especially.  I find it incredibly sad and disheartening that many pastors and teachers and especially laity do not pick up Luther and actually read what the man said beyond a watered down WELS version of the catechism.  It is no wonder that when current church leaders speak of the Word, they do so without any real life or nerve.  Luther’s words leap off the page and are still relevant, which is quite remarkable for someone who hasn’t walked the earth for about 470 years!

I did notice some editing issues at least in my copy.  These probably have already been corrected (GJ - I wish), but I wanted to bring them to your attention nonetheless.

On page 139, “On Sunday old Reble delivered a blistering sermon…”  Was it supposed to be Little instead of Reble? GJ - Yes, it was Reble, but obviously unclear.

On page 159, “(name tnot!)” GJ - Oops.

On page 161, “a move Webber borrowed from Professor Deutschland of WELS.” GJ - er

On page 168, “Paul McCain and Jack Casione…” GJ - The Cardinal's name? 

On page 172, “David Jay Weber said…”   GJ - Floyd's best pal in the Ukraine?

On page 177, “that are organically connected to justification. (   (Webber, p. 23)” 
The double parentheses before the Webber citation. GJ - Oops again.

 
Your book came to my house at a time when I was going through Luther’s Works and his examination of the first four chapters of Galatians.  It is clear after going over Luther as well as reading The Faith of Jesus that the only conclusion I can reach is that Webber has never actually read Luther’s work on the subject.  Or if he did, it was with some UOJ rose-tinted glasses because nowhere can I find any trace of UOJ in Luther’s great examination of justification by faith. 

For instance:

“Therefore faith is a constant gaze that looks at nothing except Christ, the Victor over sin and death and the Dispenser of righteousness, salvation, and eternal life.  In his epistles, therefore, Paul sets forth and urges Jesus Christ in almost every verse.  He sets Him forth through the Word, since Christ cannot be set forth any other way than through the Word and cannot be grasped any other way than through faith.”  (LW, Volume 26, page 356)

“Therefore we conclude with Paul that apart from faith in Christ, all the statesmanship and laws of the Gentiles, no matter how good and necessary, and all forms of worhip (sic) and religion are subject to sin, death, and eternal damnation unless, as follows next, there is added the promise on the basis of faith in Christ Jesus.  A great deal has been said about this earlier.  Therefore the proposition “Faith alone justifies,” which our opponents find altogether intolerable, is true.”  (LW, Volume 26, page 333)

“Thus if I am to gain comfort in a struggle of conscience or in the agony of death, I must take hold of nothing except Christ alone by faith, and I must say: “I believe in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who suffered, was crucified, and died for me.  In His wounds and death I see my sin; and in His resurrection I see victory over sin, death, and the devil, and my righteousness and life.  I neither hear nor see anything but Him.”  This is the true faith of Christ and in Christ, through which we become members of His body, of His flesh and of His bones (Eph 5:30).  Therefore in Him we live and move and have our being (Acts 17:28).”  (LW, Volume 26, page 357)


As I’ve read the materials in your books, Ichabod, and in the quoted-UOJers that you’ve collected, a thought struck me if UOJ is truly believed: doesn’t the work of the Holy Spirit become absolutely worthless?  After all, why would we even need sanctification in the first place?  If even those that perished in the flood and Judas were all saved, why do we even need the Spirit?  If Ahab, Jezebel and the locals from Sodom and Gomorrah are walking around heaven without a care in the world, then why would I even need the Holy Spirit?  I’m saved regardless so let me eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow I die, right? (GJ - Correct. That is why WELS--almost 100% UOJ--is the most abusive, alcoholic, and adulterous sect.)

That seed of faith is planted by the Holy Spirit through water and the Word.  The Holy Spirit’s work goes on in the life of every Christian from the moment we first draw breath in the waters of Baptism to the moment when we release our last breath. 

But UOJ destroys that too.  We have all been justified, regardless of faith, so why does one even need the Holy Spirit?  Why need sanctification?  UOJ not only makes faith pointless, it makes sanctification pointless as well.  Why go to church? Why partake of the Lord’s Supper?  Why own a Bible?  None of it is needed with UOJ.

Thank the Lord that He sent true theologians such as the Reformers and Luther so they could examine the truths of Scripture and therefore encourage others to examine them as well.  No matter what the list of degrees that come after the name of a “theologian”, if they cannot grasp basic concepts such as justification by faith alone, then their education is worthless.  If a Lutheran minister cannot take the trouble to actually read Luther, then why should they ever be taken seriously?

Again, thank you for the work you do and thank you again for saying what needs to be said and writing what needs to be written.


May the Lord bless you and your family,






"Our Fathers" who first used OJ and SJ in print? - the Calvinist Leonard Wood Jr.

And Ed Preuss joined the Church of Rome, becoming a famous
editor of their famous magazine, America.
Did Bob Preus mention this? No.
Jack Cascione? No.
Paul McCain? Anyone? Anyone?


Growls about CG and Church and Change privately,
expels justification by faith publicly.
Yes, pure GA form -
doing double-talk, lying, and being a total jerk.
His righteousness is extra nos, outside of us,
received through faith.
---

One last belch from SpenerQuest 




Alan Lubeck (1431)
Senior Member
Username: 1431

Post Number: 1351
Registered: 11-2004
Posted on Tuesday, February 02, 2016 - 6:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved. Believe He has reconciled you to the Father and God's wrath against your sin Has aready been satisfied in the life death and ressurection of Jesus. You brother, had nothing to do with that. You are objectvely justified even without faith. Subjectivly justfied as God's Word works faith in you to receive what He had alresdy done for the world.

Arriving Now - The Faith of Jesus: Against the Faithless Lutherans.
Join the Proof-Reading Team and Earn a Free, Full-Color Edition


Many of you will be getting your copies of the black and white version soon. It is far less expensive to print and buy than the color version, so order now (or ask me for multiple copies). My cost is about $3 each.

People have given toward this, so we can send free copies around. Ask by writing bethanylutheranworship@gmail.com

You can get a free full-color version by finding typos in the black and white edition now coming out. Identify the typos and page numbers and get a free copy. Email me at the above email address.

Another way to read it is this DropBox PDF link -

The Faith of Jesus: Against the Faithless Lutherans.

The full color edition, illustrated by Norma Boeckler, is being produced now. What the color version is done, the black and white will be retired. However, the free link to the PDF will remain. We may just have the free color link, but we are not there yet.


New Blog for Recipes, Healthy Food, Various Home and Gardening Tips

I still remember being posed for this photo at the age of four -
for the annual Melo-Cream calendar.
http://walmartlittlechef.blogspot.com/2016/02/first-post-introduction-to-walmarts.html

Some people have discussed food and recipes with me. I learned a lot by working at a Walmart Neighborhood Market.

I decided recipes would be buried in Ichadbod, The Glory Has Departed, so I decided to devote one blog to food, nutrition, health, and home tips.

If I have something to say about gardening products at Walmart, I will add them here. We shop at Neighborhood Markets and at the largest Walmart SuperCenter in Arkansas - one mile from our home.

I recognize the irony in the photo. My father said, "If I had known I would live so long, I would have taken better care of myself." He lived to be 85, but making it past 65 was pretty good when he was growing up.

I will write more about growing up Melo-Cream later.


The Satis Est Article of the Augsburg Confession and Variations in False Doctrine


I have been discussing doctrine with one reader, which led me back to the Four Questions. Professors of Lutheran Doctrine 101 will tell their students - "One side thought those questions were open questions. Now they are ELCA. Our side thought they were not. Now we are in bed with ELCA." They would never admit being in bed with ELCA, though there is definitely a feeling of flat tires in the old Walther cult. The blood-lust is gone. Instead of chopping heads off when Lutheran doctrine is mentioned, they shrug it off and discuss Walther on the sun's orbit or the correct liturgical colors to use.


The never-will-be-an-engineer side of me thought, "There must be a meter to gauge these matters, because picking or rejecting various options is not working."

Suddenly, a light went on. Why are WELS and Missouri pastors so comfortable with the Fuller Seminary professors?

The correct meter is the Pietism to Book of Concord meter, which is much broader than blaming Spener Enthusiasm and the founding of Halle University.

We got to know a number of wonderful Mennonites from living in Canada. Some went to the seminary and we became friends with others through CPE (pastoral counseling). A significant part of the Mennonite tradition is shunning. The extreme version includes never talking to and never doing business with the excluded one. Reasons for shunning vary on which branch the members are in. Some are extremely strict - others are easily confused with liberal Protestants.



Babtists shun with a vengeance. They may be honey chile and darlin' one minute, but steely-eyed and I-dont-know-ya the next. Like the Mafia kiss of death, they may say "I'm praying for you" as their final word. Later, they will add this curse to any mention of your name - "Bless his heart."

So this is my newly imagined meter - Pietism.

We are all influenced by Pietism. 

  1. Blue laws keep people from buying certain products on Sunday. Pietism. 
  2. Some may not pray with their Lutheran relatives. Pietism. 
  3. Some WELSians regard only those WELS members from the same state to be true blue. Pietism. 
  4. One LCMS seminary is far superior to the other one. Pietism.
  5. One never asks a Philadelphia graduate if he went to Gettysburg. And vice versa. Pietism.
  6. Hating the liturgy, creeds, hymns, and pipe organ. Pietism.
  7. Thinking the real church is in the cell group. Pietism.
  8. Mutual hatred among Auburn and Alabama fans. Green Bay and Vikings fans. Pietism.
  9. Use of the NIV by Lutheran synods - Pietism.
  10. All the synods in America came from Pietism.
Pietism excludes the Book of Concord, and the Lutheran Confessions exclude Pietism. Let us exclude the term Confessional Lutheran for all time. Richard John Neuhaus, a pastor in LCMS-AELC-LCA-ELCA was a Confessional Lutheran until the moment he became a Roman Catholic priest. Everyone is a Confessional Lutheran today, so the term is meaningless, especially since so many are really neo-Pietists or quasi-Universalists or Masons.

Someone who 
  • knows, 
  • reads, 
  • appreciates, 
  • and uses the Book of Concord as a one-volume Biblical commentary
will necessarily loathe Pietism, its crafts and assaults.



The UOJ Stormtroopers have no assurance of forgiveness, in spite of their blabbing about grace and the world being declared forgiven at various points in time (birth, death, resurrection of Christ). They love, love, love Babtist and Pentecostal worship because there is some hint of justification by faith, even if those Enthusiasts trash everything else. The Stormtroopers really are forgiveness-starved and need our pity.

Luther and the Book of Concord exclude Pietism just as oil excludes water. Want to rust-proof your car from the inside? Spray WD-40 into the recesses. The light oil will cling to the metal and exclude water. In the same way, 
  • the power and efficacy of the Word
  • the Means of Grace
  • the work of the Spirit through the Word alone, 
  • the Sacraments, and
  • justification by faith
will exclude the crafts and assaults of Pietism, repelling those odious associations and errors. Those Lutherans enrolled in the Book of Concord fan club will not fall prey to the fads and feelings of Pietism



The more Lutherans let go of the Book of Concord, the more they sink into the Slough of Pietism. Evidence - the despicable UOJ essay by Jay Webber mentions Luther's Commentary on Galatians, which is highly commended by the Book of Concord, but Webber never deals with the content of that treasury of spiritual knowledge. One can pose as a Lutheran and gain the applause of other frauds, snake-oil salesmen, and wolves, but the evidence remains.

That is why Lutheran publishing is so pitiful today.

Melanchthon graded your Emmaus paper - "F." 
Still an F.


Luther has your number, Synodicrats.