 |
| Waltherians later adopted the SJ/OJ distinction from the Calvinist translator's explanation of the Halle Pietist, Knapp. That is a mongrel's DNA - not what Webber claims. |
 |
| Darth Buchholz and his subservient disciple, Oh! Jay Webber, are a tag-team, fakes, just like pro wrestling. |
What is the objective/subjective justification controversy all about? | Steadfast Lutherans:
Webber intoned:
"The intended points of a properly-explained objective/subjective justification teaching have always been a part of Lutheran doctrine."
'via Blog this'
***
GJ -
 |
| A careful reading of this blather shows Walther taught against Justification by Faith and required making a decision for his Halle-born universal absolution without faith. Walther was weak in the Biblical languages, like Webber. |
Webber intoned:
"The intended points of a properly-explained objective/subjective justification teaching have always been a part of Lutheran doctrine."
Webber deceives readers when he claims OJ/SJ to have been always taught among Lutherans. Following the entire Bible - Luther and the Book of Concord confessed Justification by Faith Alone. Chemnitz and Gerhard too. P. Leyser crushed the Webber wannabee Huber who tried to teach universal absolution at Wittenberg.
No, universal absolution without faith (OJ/SJ) came from Pietism, which was heavily influenced by Calvinism.
No one has a patent on OJ/SJ, but the earliest combination found is from the Calvinist Leonard Wood explained the opaque language of Knapp, the very famous - still in print - Halle theologian.
 |
| The explanation is from Woods, a Calvinist superstar, This book became a leading text among Protestants for the next 90 years. The German Missouri Synod would have used the original. |
No one can defend OJ/SJ with the historical facts, so WELS-LCMS-ELS-ELCA leaders pursue their common agenda to unite their radical apostasy.
OJ/SJ - that fits so well with the apostasy of Church Growth.
