Wednesday, July 12, 2017

Creation Garden Plans

The royal gardens in Hannover are a good model for the future gardens at the Ichabode.

We have had an uncommon amount of rain for July, lately coming in one-inch installments. As anyone can guess, the grass and clover are lush, thick, and growing fast. One Crepe Myrtle twig has bloomed with red-white picotee flowers. The little plant looks like tiny fireworks on the west side of the garden.

Buckwheat can be grown for its seed - and flour -
but many grow it to suppress weeds
and to support pollinating insects.

I expected Buckwheat to be knee-high when flowering. Insead, some of the many plants are chest-high. I had to look hard for one Mr. Lincoln that was surrounded by Buckwheat - definitely a What-Have-I-Done? moment.

Before the tongue-clucking begins, consider this. Thousands of roots have wired themselves into the local fungus network and will produce an astonishing amount of organic matter for next year's garden.

 In my dreams. Last year our helper laughed
at me every time he saw our tiny Elephant Ears.

I will cut back some Buckwheat, but not on one particular patch of new garden. I finished covering that area with cardboard and mulch in the spring. As expected, the grass decomposed underneath and the red wiggler earthworms frolicked. Unexpectedly, the failed Elephant Ears  - from last summer - punched through the cardboard and mulch to grow quickly in the rains. Disappointed in the royal price and miserly growth of the tender bulbs, I left both of them to die in the wintry soil. But we had a mild winter and determined bulbs. So the Buckwheat is growing around the Elephant Ears as they shoot upwards.

We often think of weeds choking and ruining crops. That might lead people to think that the Buckwheat is overdone and possibly overwhelming for the other plants, even roses. That depends on the growth habit of the main plants, whether they rise above the cover crop or not.

Vines are more likely to overwhelm and smother a plant. The real problem is a garden with no maintenance or one with fanatical tilling, stirring, and spraying.

 Every tree stump is food for good fungus and bugs,
a perch for birds and squirrels, a shelter microbes and toads.
I put our holey-ist stump near the faucet,
to keep it moist and rotting.



Rain Infiltration
Doubtless the Buckwheat has improved the value of the mulch, but promoting infiltration of the rain, during heavy and light rains. The fear many have is that mulch will absorb the light rains. A heavy rain can float the mulch downhill, though my mulch does not float. I have dug beneath mulch to find the soil quite dry during drought periods.

Our garden is even more spongy than the lawns of my neighbors - yes, I check. The rose garden resembles an enormous foam rubber mattress beneath.

God's plan is obvious. Soil is only bare when man rakes all the loose leaves and grass away. Additional hoing and micro-tilling can open up even more bare soil. When the sun shines on bare soil, the microbes die from the 150 degree heat.

But God uses the wind and animal droppings to replant bare soil. Birds plant their favorite foods. So do squirrels and blue jays. Some gardeners say - "String a wire to get birds to roost and plant bird food." Tree stumps will do the same without garroting garden guests as they stroll through the lanes.

Hostas enjoy morning sun and appreciate afternoon shade,
just like roses. Why not grow them among the roses as a cover crop and hummingbird feeder?


Taking Hostas from the Shadows
I am looking at ways to blend the roses with other plants that show off the rose blooms. Hostas may work well because the plant slowly spreads through its roots. The accepted place for Hosta is in the shade, but they have preferences similar to roses - morning sun, afternoon shade. Sometimes teeny inexpensive Hostas are available for fall planting, a good time to establish the roots.

Hundreds of Mouse Ears are heading for the Wild Garden. Commelina communis - is the scientific name. 
Asiatic Dayflower is another name.
Mrs. 29A said, "Those are not violets. I don't know what they are, but they are definitely not violets." I picked one flower and took it to the computer. I began matching its characteristics to photos in Google Images.

"There it is - Mouse Ears. Eureka. I have found it." Some consider the plant a spreading, weedy pest, but I have seen it occupy the same place along the fence for five years. Now a column is marching into the Wild Garden, which was mostly autumn leaf mulch. Something was going to spread there, so a low-growing herbal plant that supports beneficial insects is not all bad. Tune in later for a What Have I Done? post.

Half the fun of gardening is identification of new plants, often called weeds, but definitely worth studying.

Creation Gardening is a lot less work, much cheaper, and more fun than buying equipment and chemicals to do a bad job when God works so well on His own.

 The rainfall means the Crepe Myrtle is going to seed fast
and will need an early pruning for more blooms.
The white flowers are Buckwheat, but they are much higher
than a week ago.

Reader Request - Pietism versus the Means of Grace



Ichabod post:
The mainline denominations are based upon Pietism and Calvinism, and they include the LCMS, WELS, and the other ones claiming to be Lutheran while also despising Luther's doctrine. The slide into Universalism was inevitable, given the Pietistic foundation of the ELCA-LCMS-WELS-ELS. Stephan and his toady Walther came over as Pietists with cell groups, and the Synodical Conference promotes cell groups more than ever before. Pietism does not mix well with the Means of Grace: one excludes the other.

Pietism is a big topic to study. Fortunately, I came from a college where Pietism was its foundation, and they had no trouble discussing the topic - Augustana College, Rock Island, Illinois. The Pietist was the name of the independent Swedish tabloid that influenced their escape to America.

In contrast, WELS-ELS-LCMS came from Pietism and cannot admit that simple fact. Mirthless Mark Schroeder claimed WELS had always been orthodox and still is. The Steadfast Lutheran (sic) Harrison fan-club imagines they are against Pietism when they discuss tobacco and alcohol!  Both groups advocate  Pietism's UOJ and argue against Justification by Faith.


Pietism's Real Church versus the Means of Grace
Pietism began as a revolt against the philosophical debates of the Lutherans and Calvinists. 

The Pietists gathered around a given congregation, but the real church was the lay-led cell group. Pietism fostered the idea that their cell groups - for prayer and Bible study - set them apart and made them superior to the spiritually dead hedonists in the congregation and state church.

Therefore, they identified preaching and teaching the Word and administering the Sacraments as subordinate to their prayer and Bible study groups.

Walther's Bishop Stephan was a Pietist called to a Pietist congregation. Stephan organized a parallel group of Pietists to support him and to meet elsewhere with him (contrary to law). He claimed spiritual and sexual control over the women in his group, but seemed to specialize in young, single women.

Walther got his Easter absolution Objective Justification from Stephan and always taught that the entire world was declared righteous when Christ rose from the dead. This is the teaching of Pietism's Halle University, not Luther, Melanchthon, Chemnitz, or the Bible.

The Walther circle followed one abusive Pietist leader until he moved away and died, then latched onto Stephan, another abusive Pietist. This was the later state of Pietism, where those followers found relief from the rationalism in the state church. The state church considered them mystics and trouble-makers - and were not eager to ordain them or give them positions in the state church.

The Means of Grace were administered in the state churches by the rationalistic clergy who were seen as enemies of the Pietists. The state church passed anti-conventicle laws against the Pietists, which served to increase the alienation. Therefore, all Pietists - not just Lutherans - saw each other's groups as allies and the state churches of Europe as the enemy. The Pietistic Lutherans who came to America were inclined to join with any group that also promised to emphasize holiness and separating from the evil world. Many Swedes became Methodists and Mormons for that reason.

Characteristics
1. Doctrinal indifference. Pietists are annoyed and infuriated by doctrinal
discernment.
2. Unionism. We find an unseemly zeal in Pietists to have all manner of
denominations in religious projects together. Some examples are James
Tiefel’s pan-denominational worship conference, Bethany College
having a Roman Catholic bishop as a featured speaker, and Wisconsin
Lutheran College aping Bethany by promoting Roman Catholic
Archbishop Weakland as a special speaker, along with other Roman
Catholic priests!388 The Missouri Synod has featured ELCA women
pastors preaching in their pulpits, always with a feeble and toothless
response.
3. Lay led cell groups. According to Pietists, this is the real church. They
feverishly promote cell groups under a variety of names: home Bible
study, prayer, koinonia, care or share groups. Lutheran Pietists need
congregations to support their work, but they regard those who attend
cell group meetings as the only genuine members. Waldo Werning and
Kent Hunter, both listed in Who’s Who in Church Growth, heavily
promoted cell groups in the Missouri Synod and WELS. Cell groups
manufacture disciples, they claim.
4. The ordination of women. Cell groups have by-passed normal
synodical restrictions on women teaching men and usurping authority.
St. Paul’s Lutheran Church in Columbus, Ohio, introduced Serendipity
cell groups in the 1980s with a husband and wife leading the sessions.
Soon the husband disappeared. Then, when a man questioned how the
group was being managed, the woman snarled at him, “I’m in charge
here.”
5. Promotion of Reformed publications. Look up the Northwestern
Publishing House website and look at the evangelism books. Examine
the reading list for the Missouri Synod’s evangelism committees and
synodical commission. Read the Church of the Lutheran Confession’s
While There Is Day. Study footnotes in evangelism books. You will find
the muddy footprints of the Reformed. You will not find these
characters promoting orthodox Lutheran authors. 
6. Spiritual gifts inventory. Lutheran leaders borrowed this from the
Pentecostals, dreaming that it would beef up their congregation’s
size.390
7. Denigration of the ministry, worship, and the Sacraments. Everyone is a
minister, so the divinely called pastor becomes a hireling to manage cell
groups. Worship must generate fuzzy feelings, so the Law/Gospel
sermon, the liturgy, creeds, pipe organ, and vestments must go.
Baptism can remain for now, but Holy Communion is pushed into the background as an obstacle.


Born-Again Pietists
Pietistic groups also insisted on a born-again experience, misinterpreting John 3, so that provided an identity and no lack of sanctimony among them, which remains a singular characteristic today. The Church Growthers - now called Missional - are the real Christians and their cell groups build the real church.

J-758
"What may be the reason why the Pietists, who were really well-intentioned
people, hit upon the doctrine that no one could be a Christian unless he had
ascertained the exact day and hour of his conversion? The reason is that they
imagined a person must suddenly experience a heavenly joy and hear an inner
voice telling him that he had been received into grace and had become a child
of God. Having conceived this notion of the mode and manner of conversion,
they were forced to declare that a person must be able to name the day and
hour when he was converted, became a new creature, received forgiveness of
sins, and was robed in the righteousness of Christ. However, we have already
come to understand in part what a great, dangerous, and fatal error this is."
C. F. W. Walther, The Proper Distinction Between Law and Gospel, trans., W.
H. T. Dau, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1928, p. 194f. Thesis IX.

Rationalism
"Meanwhile, back in Europe the corrosive effects of Pietism in blurring
doctrinal distinctions had left much of Lutheranism defenseless against the
devastating onslaught of Rationalism which engulfed the continent at the
beginning of the 19th century. With human reason set up as the supreme
authority for determining truth, it became an easy matter to disregard doctrinal
differences and strive for a 'reasonable' union of Lutherans and Reformed."
Martin W. Lutz, "God the Holy Spirit Acts Through the Lord's
Supper," God The Holy Spirit Acts, ed., Eugene P. Kaulfield, Milwaukee:

Northwestern Publishing House, 1972, p. 176.

Note - the heart of the rationalistic Seminex movement in the LCMS came from WELS' Northwestern College, two of its faculty members, and many of its alumni. NWC alumni meetings have often featured cars with Seminex bumper stickers.

J-760
"Pietism greatly weakened the confessional consciousness which was
characteristic of orthodox Lutheranism."
Helge Nyman, "Preaching (Lutheran): History," The Encyclopedia of the
Lutheran Church, 3 vols., ed. Julius Bodensieck, Minneapolis: Augsburg
Publishing House, 1965, III, p. 1945.

Jacob Spener published his Pia Desideria (Pious Wishes) in 1675 when
he was 40 years old. The famous book was simply an essay, published as a
preface to one of J. Arndt’s sermon books. Spener had the advantage of a free
promotional ride in a very popular and respected book. Much later, Arndt was
still regarded as highly as Luther, so Spener had the benefit of this association.
The Muhlenberg tradition regarded Pietism favorably, but the Missouri Synod
did not. Nevertheless, for all the sound criticism aimed at Pietists by name in
Law and Gospel, Walther did not name Spener in his classic work. Although I am
guessing, I believe that Walther spared Spener because of the man’s iconic
stature in the Lutheran Church. Spener’s proposals in Pia Desideria are
summarized by Heick below.

J-761
“It contains six proposals for a reformation of the Church:
(1) a more diligent study of the Bible;
(2) a more serious application of Luther’s doctrine of the general
priesthood of all believers;
(3) confession of Christ by deed rather than a fruitless search after
theological knowledge;
(4) prayer for unbelievers and erring Christians rather than useless
dogmatic disputations;
(5) reform of the theological curriculum with emphasis on personal
piety;
(6) devotional arrangement of sermons instead of formal arrangement
after the manner of rhetoric.”

Mark and Avoid Jeske, Pietist:
Pastor Mark Jeske offered almost the same program of Pietistic reform
in the Wisconsin Synod, when he addressed a conference:

J-762
Here are the top ten areas of our ministries in which I would like to see
changed.
1. Myself. I trust God too little...
2. We don't prize our synod and our ministry relationships enough... Our
called workers at 2929 will tell you that they take a lot more abuse than
encouragement.
3. We need to loosen up.... Our public worship/praise/prayer style seems
stiff, overly formal, unemotional, smotheringly doctrinal. I personally
do not think that our synod in general has a good balance of head &
heart in our worship life. There. I said it. [GJ- "heart" is a Pietism slogan]
4. Our schools are not being fully utilized to draw unchurched people into
the fellowship.
5. We need to love cities more. [GJ - But live in the posh, white burbs, like him.]
6. We need to welcome diversity, prize new racial groups and the cultural
and ministry treasures that they bring. New people groups coming in to
the WELS will not pollute our "pure" (quotation marks in the original)
Lutheran practices. but enrich them.
7. We need a little more sanity and calm in our discussions of church
fellowship. Things I can't stand:
• Assigning a seminary professor a paper and then letting all
applications and conclusions become canon law instead of each of
us getting into Word [sic] personally.
• Passing off crude oversimplification as WELS canon law, such as,
"You can't pray with anybody who is not WELS," or "if anyone
rejects a clear word of God, he is in rebellion against the most High
God and you can't be sure that he/she is really saved.
• We have a very highly developed sense of what we can't do with
other Christians, to the point that it is safer to have nothing to do
with other Christians. We lack the positive side of dealing with
other Christians in practical ways.
8. I think we need a little more sanity in dealing with men/women role
issues in the church... sometimes the WELS position is described as
asserting male headship in all relationships: in family, church and
society. Scripture speaks only of the first two areas, and so should we.


 Jeske organizes these Change or Die! Conferences
to emphasize unionism and women's ordination.
No one in his tribe (WELS) seems to mind.
He is a typical Pietist - sanctimonious and opposed to sound doctrine.

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Universalist, Then Unitarian, Then Atheist

Matt the Fatt, Mirthless Mark, and Pope John the Malefactor
are too cowardly to admit they are Universalists:
they agree with ELCA leaders - everyone is forgiven and saved,
pure amazin' grace.

A few have asked me why some are beating me up - on Facebook - for posting what I have been writing about for over 20 years. A Missouri Synod pastor f-bombed me in a public post and another LCMS pastor continued the tirade, demanding that I answer their rude, intemperate, and illogical rants.

Perhaps the laity have caught the scent of their dogma, like the people who wrote, "Our neighbor got into hog farming. We just got wind of it."

Reflecting on the rage of the Universal Objective Justification clergy (seldom laity), I considered the fate of the Universalists who are now allied with the Unitarians in the Unitarian Universalist Association.

My neighbor in Columbus was a Universalist minister and he even invited me to conduct an entire service, with my own organist, at his congregation. He explained to me that the Universalists were quite conservative, not at all like the radical Leftist Unitarians. I did not object to conducting a service, except for the fact that it promised to be more of a dog and pony show for the curious.

His comments intrigued me and I continued to look into this strange UUA combination, which is really less bizarre than WELS-LCMS working with ELCA.

The Universalists began with the same kind of proofs as the UOJ/OJists provide today. I am taking this from Wikipedia because anyone can go from there and find additional information. Their article is rather flawed but that is natural considering the long history and variations.

LCMS-WELS clergy often say, "All are forgiven. All are saved. Everyone. Everyone." See the George Borghardt video and almost anything by a Preus. These pastors and their camp followers will say, "I was saved 2000 years ago."

What makes them furious is anyone questioning that God declared the entire world righteous, forgiven, either at the cross or the resurrection (with a few other Moments of Absolution posited as well).

Their general argument follows this pattern: Christ died for the sins of all, so everyone is forgiven and saved.

The Universalists of America seemed to be Trinitarian at first, and one of their older hymnals has many traditional Christian hymns in it.

Tufts University was founded to promote Universalism, and its first president was a Universalist. Its chaplaincy program now has a pan-religious, Left-wing emphasis.

 PT Barnum  gave its newly founded institution of higher education, Tufts College, $50,000 to establish a Museum of Natural History; and later he gave Tufts another $100,000 to build two wings to the museum. In addition he sent the museum mounted skins, skeletons and other animal remains, and the great elephant Jumbo's hide.



Wiki 0n Thomas Wittemore
"The glory of God, and of His Son Jesus Christ, as manifested in the final holiness and happiness of all men, is the central sun of Universalism."
-Thomas Wiltmore, Plain Guide to Universalism.

Some Bible verses he cites and are cited by other Christian Universalists are:
  1. 1 Corinthians 15:22[18]
    • "For as in Adam ALL die, so also in Christ shall ALL be made alive." (ESV; emphasis added)
  2. 2 Peter 3:9
    • "The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance." (ESV; emphasis added)

As anyone can plainly see, the Universalists used the passages about the Atonement without considering the Means of Grace, so they concluded that there could be no difference between Christ dying for the sins of the world and the entire world being forgiven and saved.

The jubilate, celebrate, happy-clappy world of the mainlines took over this view and finally got a Bible to state that "all have sinned and all are justified" Romans 3:22 New NIV - endorsed and officially adopted by the treacherous and dishonest WELS.

The mainline denominations are based upon Pietism and Calvinism, and they include the LCMS, WELS, and the other ones claiming to be Lutheran while also despising Luther's doctrine. The slide into Universalism was inevitable, given the Pietistic foundation of the ELCA-LCMS-WELS-ELS. Stephan and his toady Walther came over as Pietists with cell groups, and the Synodical Conference promotes cell groups more than ever before. Pietism does not mix well with the Means of Grace: one excludes the other.

 "We won, Brett. OK, Liz Eaton kicked me out of the leadership,
but that is the price of progress."


How Could the Universalists Merge with the Unitarians?
The Unitarians began by rejecting the Trinity and still being rather moralistic. My aunt Jennifer was a Unitarian and one of my best members ever grew up a Unitarian. Jean said to me, "What you say about Unitarians was not true when I was growing up. They had a strong ethical emphasis. And we believed in God."

That was true, but the radical Unitarians grabbed power in their group, just as the UOJ Stormtroopers did in the LCMS and WELS.

As Luther wrote, when the Means of Grace are rejected, all kinds of foul errors rush in. Thus the Universalists could not withstand the erosion of their doctrine into a form congenial with the Universalists, and they went radical together.

Is that odd or unusual? Not at all. WELS Synod President, LCMS Synod President Ralph Bohlmann, and ELCA President Herb Chilstrom met together with their leaders at the Snowbird Conference. No one had any qualms about it, as long as the WELS members and clergy knew nothing about it. I published the article and photo via Christian News and Hell broke loose. But nothing stopped their joint evangelism efforts, joint worship, or joint anything. They simply stopped putting out joint ELCA-WELS-LCMS news releases.

For the record, Carl Mischke denied that WELS was participating in the insurance-funded ELCA Joy Radio show. Letter to Pastor James Sherod. I phoned the ELCA leader about this denial and he was perplexed and outraged. His secretary said, "Barber (WELS) comes to all our meetings." Later, WELS leaders said that the Joy Radio show was instrumental alone and featured no actual singing, so it was not unionism. Hahahahahaha.

 When you foul your own nest,
do not complain about the results.

 The articles of faith in the Apostles' Creed
do not fit in with our modern, scientific age, 

according to this "scholarly" book.


The Universalists of WELS-LCMS Have Joined with the Unitarians of ELCA
I do not have to explain the denial of all Biblical doctrines in ELCA, do I? That began in earnest with the Braaten-Jenson Dogmatics, which some in the LCA considered a "conservative" response to the leaders who thought all theology was outmoded today.

Braaten-Jenson denied the Trinity, the Virgin Birth, the Resurrection, on and on. I ordered a set to read to my LCA congregation, then mailed them back to get a refund. The smirky Fortress responder wrote, "It is a best-seller." Indeed, it was the official doctrinal book of the LCA.

Note well - even if you ignore everything else - this same Carl Braaten, theological star of the LCA and ELCA - denounced the infamous 2009 ELCA convention for changing the rules of marriage and ordination.

This is what happened in Minneapolis: appeals to reason and experience trumped Scripture and tradition, punctuated with pious injunctions of Lutheran slogans and clichés. The majority won. And they said it was the work of the Spirit, forgetting that the Holy Spirit had already spoken volumes through the millennia of Scriptural interpretation, the councils of the church, and its creeds and confessions. Carl Braaten
PS - I especially appreciate Braaten's invocation of the Holy Spirit, because his dogmatics book says the Trinity is little more than God, the man Jesus, and the spirit of the believing community.
ELCA began falling apart and the seminaries collapsing soon afterwards, but Braaten built the foundation for the Mark Hanson-Liz Eaton takeover.

Surely WELS would be repulsed by any association with ELCA, especially when their Big Brother elected a lady Presiding Bishop. But no, WELS may claim Black Belt status in fellowship canon law, but they violate it for their lust for mammon. Isn't their media star, Mark Jeske, a WELS pastor, a Pieper grandson? They extended the Left Foot of Fellowship to a seminary president for less than Jeske's normal daily output.


Monday, July 10, 2017

Irony Abounds Where JBFA Is Banned - “Confessing the Faith with the Augsburg Confessors” (Sermon on Psalm 119:46, by Pr. Charles Henrickson) | Steadfast Lutherans

“Confessing the Faith with the Augsburg Confessors” (Sermon on Psalm 119:46, by Pr. Charles Henrickson) | Steadfast Lutherans: "“Confessing the Faith with the Augsburg Confessors” (Sermon on Psalm 119:46, by Pr. Charles Henrickson)
Posted on June 24, 2017 by Pastor Charles Henrickson

“Confessing the Faith with the Augsburg Confessors” (Psalm 119:46)"



'via Blog this'

***

GJ - Readers may remember that Steadfast Lutherans banned any links to Ichabod, banned any posts from me, and also banned posts from those Lutherans who agreed with Justification by Faith as taught in the Scriptures, the Augsburg Confession, the Book of Concord, and Justification and Rome.

The faithful have not gone away, in spite of the shunning, but the Synodical Conference is slipping back down into the ooze from which it came - Pietism, Rationalism, Episcopal sex abuse, VD, and false doctrine.


Irony Alert - From the Enemy of Justification by Faith
The Anniversary of the Augsburg Confession — Sermon by Pastor Rolf Preus | Steadfast Lutherans



The Anniversary of the Augsburg Confession — Sermon by Pastor Rolf Preus | Steadfast Lutherans:

"The Anniversary of the Augsburg Confession — Sermon by Pastor Rolf Preus
Posted on June 26, 2017 by Pastor Rolf Preus
The Anniversary of the Augsburg Confession
June 25, 2017
“Confessing the True Faith”
Matthew 10:26-33"

Rolfie One Note complains that I quote from his
father's book, perhaps because Justification and Rome refutes the Preus clan's UOJ franchise.

'

via Blog this'

 Count the times Rolf mentions "faith" in his ironic message.

Not the How But the Why - The Failure of Apostate Leaders


By Norma Boeckler


Joel Salatin, Creation farmer, has a great statement in his book, The Ecstasy of Being a Lunatic Farmer. He pits himself against the chemical and high-tech agricultural experts by saying, "It's not the how but the why."

Creation Garden roses - from asking why.


Salatin pursues the why, which is rooted in Creation. If God created the plants and animals to live and prosper together, why would we not follow that plan? American soil became fertile in ancient times from the deep roots of grasses and the manure of grazing animals. So we switched to grains and began forcing production with nitrogen fertilizer and other chemical marvels. The result - soil is depleted and blows away in the wind - or runs off in the growing menace of floods.

Larry Olson only answers questions in class when
the students address him as "Dr. Olson."
A Church Growth DMin is precious in WELS, but the
Means of Grace are despised.


Donald McGavran's How
Some of you are wondering where this is going. The key statement of Church Growth is probably from Donald McGavran, the sultan of self-serving statistics. "We all know that a plane flies. But how does it fly?"

I trembled when I read that statement - not from excitement, but from holding back my belly-laughs in the monastic serenity of the Trinity Seminary Library.

The Church Growth argument is this - All we need to do is reverse-engineer the large congregation to duplicate the results. Thus the now-bankrupt Crystal Cathedral of Robert Schuller, and his generic celebrity bully methods, became the Final Solution for the Church Growth gurus.

The raging question is always - how? - and not why? So if someone asks, "How can I build a large congregation? - the answer is cell groups. Long before I knew John Lawrenz was a founder of Church and Change, I challenged him on authoring a Bible study for cell groups. I told him, "You know that is basic to Pietism? Why promote Pietism?" He had no answer for that.



God's Why
Lenski began and ended with why? He said something no other church leader would say today, although I once heard a liberal LCA bishop say almost the same thing - "Fads come and go, but only the Word builds up the church." The bishop said, "It all depends on the Word of God."

We can reverse-engineer the why. God clearly teaches, in His best-selling book, that He only works through the Word. To show how true this is, and to engrain it in our hearts and minds, He gave us the analogy of rain and snow.

The rain and snow come down from Heaven and they never return in vain. If you would try to tell farmers or gardeners that snow-melt is nothing, that rain does not change anything, they would write you off as incredibly dull, lacking observational skills, or high on loco-weed.

Rain and snow create seed for the sower and bread for our meals. I just had some bread for breakfast, and Sassy asked for her share, buttered with cinnamon on it. No crust - she spits that out.

Rain is so powerful for gardening that I gather as much as possible in barrels and ration it o the special plants between rains. Some are favorites and others are ICU cases. The tallest Crepe Myrtle twig I have is the one I give rain-water to, almost daily. Transplants are weak at first, so I give them rain-water to boost their roots and feed the microbes in the soil around their roots.

Thus the analogy is perfect. The Word comes from heaven, from God, and He has attached three specific Promises to His Word:

  1. My Word will never return void, accomplishing nothing.
  2. My Word will always accomplish My purpose - not man's.
  3. My Word will prosper My will.

Isaiah 55:8 For My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways, saith the Lord.For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts.10 For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater:11 So shall my Word be that goeth forth out of My mouth: it shall not return unto Me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.

 The lop-sided smile betrays his unhappiness.

We should not overlook the Promises being three-fold:

  1. It shall not return unto Me void, 
  2. but it shall accomplish that which I please, 
  3. and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.
God is always at work in the Word and never apart from the Word. If a congregation pays $3,000 (minimum, just to show up) for Koine to sing one of their idiotic secular songs, that money and time accomplish nothing, even if the groupies adore the show.

Some honest pastors will admit that their cell group ministry introduced all kinds of Pentecostal problems, but others do not care. As one Church and Change pioneer said, "I don't care what they study, as long as they study."

All the cell group material is either Pentecostal, Pietistic, or rationalistic, so the chances are excellent that they will become even more antagonistic toward Biblical, Lutheran doctrine. But who cares if the congregation is growing in size?

The synodical leaders are pampered and flattered by the Church Growth salesmen, who all know how to make them prosper. However, Matt the Fatt is covered in flop-sweat as Missouri begins dissolving. Mirthless Mark Schroeder has told his dwindling sect, FIC, that it will continue going downhill in money and members. Pope John the Malefactor is looking for a good cantor for the ELS funeral.

The two presidents are laughing about their royal salaries and benefits: "I wonder what the poor are doing tonight?"

Sunday, July 9, 2017

Higher Things – Quo Vadis? | Steadfast Lutherans - UOJ.
Christian News UOJ. Higher Things UOJ.

Pieter Bruegel the Younger - The Blind Leading the Blind:
Otten's UOJ Tabloid Posting Steadfast Lutheran's UOJ Questioning Higher Things UOJ.
ELDONA's Bishop Heiser was proud to speak for Higher Things years ago, and Klemet Preus (UOJ) as HT prez thanked him.

LCMS UOJ Stormtroopers defended Georgie One-Note's UOJ
on Facebook -
and attacked Justification by Faith in a roundabout way,
yelling Eighth Commandment
!

 Former Steadfast editor Tim Rossow called
those who defended Justification by Faith "morons."


Higher Things – Quo Vadis? | Steadfast Lutherans:

"Over the years Higher Things has received the support of many readers of Brothers of John Steadfast as well as of our editors. Sadly and with great regret the editors of the Brothers of John the Steadfast can no longer give such support under its current leadership. Our readers must understand why.

In the summer of 2015 Higher Things published an article by a former Missouri Synod pastor, Greg Eilers, who has gender dysphoria and as of this writing has undergone sexual reassignment surgery. After concerns were raised, Higher Things removed the article in its online form and published a retraction. The retraction contained difficult and confusing verbiage. It was unclear, but recent actions have shown that the direction that originally published the article is still the direction of the organization.
Higher Things has now invited Dr. Daniel van Voorhis, the resident scholar of 1517 The Legacy Project, to be a plenary and breakout speaker at their 2017 summer conferences. 1517 The Legacy Project is what our fathers would have properly identified as a Heterodox Tract and Missionary Society. How do we know this? From what they state about themselves and what they do. They do not identify as Lutheran and fit more the mold of generic protestantism where Lutheranism is just one of many Reformation traditions.  Their Reformation Conference speakers include orthodox theologians, as well those who do not share our confession of faith, and a devotion leader who has disqualified himself from public ministry. One cannot say that this conference is a Free Conference for the discussion of theological issues for 1517 The Legacy Project says:

“This is our legacy as children of the Reformation, and it gives us great cause for both celebration and proclamation in 2017. A celebration of the truths recovered in the Reformation and re-proclamation of them to the world and Church, which seems to be in great danger of forgetting them. To this end, we are excited to announce Here We Still Stand: A Reformation Conference. We have assembled an incredible line-up of over 20 speakers and musicians for this event, and YOU are invited to join us as we examine the men, ideas, and passages of Scripture that sparked the Reformation and yes—to have a huge party!”
The vision of 1517 is listed as:

“1517. The Legacy Project serves churches and the world by providing a message of hope for those broken by the church, supplying theological resources that strengthen congregations, and modeling ways of engaging the culture in a manner that is thoughtful, courageous, and Christ-centered.”

Our readers can discern for themselves what 1517 The Legacy Project is about. We encourage the confessional Lutheran speakers we admire to remove themselves from association with 1517 The Legacy Project. We believe they do not know what they have joined themselves to. However, we do believe that the current leadership of Higher Things knows exactly what it is doing by its repeated difficulties on these topics.

The Scholar in Residence and Director of Curriculum for 1517 The Legacy Project, Dr. van Voorhis interviewed Mr. Eilers and his wife for the “Virtue in the Wasteland” podcast. (Part 1) (Part 2). The interview is long (3 hours), but to be informed our readers should listen to both parts and judge for themselves if the doctrine of the Evangelical Lutheran Church and Natural Law are affirmed. We believe they are rejected. [Is this what we want our children exposed to?] Yet, not only has Higher Things invited Dr. van Voorhis to be a plenary and breakout speaker, 1517 the Legacy Project is a sponsor of this summer’s conferences, with prominent billing on their conference shirts.

Note this quotation from Higher Things President Rev. George Borghardt in a recent post: “We are really excited to have 1517 sponsor our conference shirts. Our organizations share a common love for the gospel and the comfort of troubled consciences.” He continued: “We’re grateful to all of our sponsors for their support as we dare youth to be Lutheran.”

The question must be asked what kind of Lutheran?"

 Eilers could have joined WELS easily,
since they do transgender at the prep, college, seminary,
and pastoral level.


'via Blog this'

***

GJ - I rest my case about the Lutheran UOJ sects (ELCA-WELS-ELS-LCMS-CLC sic) going downhill together.

The UOJists despise each other, at least publicly, but they teach the same toxic dogma, that God has declared the entire world forgiven and saved - straight (pardon the pun) outta Halle University's Pietism.

Luke 6:39 And he spake a parable unto them, Can the blind lead the blind? shall they not both fall into the ditch?
40 The disciple is not above his master: but every one that is perfect shall be as his master.
41 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but perceivest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
42 Either how canst thou say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother's eye.


From my Facebook page - 



John C. Drosendahl How much more "out of context" could one take Borghardt? Seriously? While the antichrist is a non-theologian, disrespecting and replacing God's Word with everything else under the sun, the Pres of HT is nothing but a sola scriptura theologian whose shoes I could not possibly fit in (mostly because he has such small feet). 

What part of the distinction between objective justification "salvation is paid for for all" and subjective justification "only believers are receivers of the gift of salvation" do you not comprehend?

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyYesterday at 9:49amEdited
Remove
Gregory L. Jackson Haha. I comprehend OJ/SJ all too well - it came from the Calvinist translator of Knapp, a Halle theologian. The burden is on the so-called Lutherans who have abandoned Justification by Faith in the Scriptures and the Book of Concord.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply
2
Yesterday at 1:37pm
Edit
John C. Drosendahl Oh, I know *you* do...it's others who will run with such nonsense...

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyYesterday at 4:35pm
Remove
Drew Newman I have heard Pastor Borghardt speak on many occasions and I have to believe this quote was taken out of context and expresses or understanding of objective justification without further explanation that without that work of Christ being applied to the individual it is worthless. Christ did die for all, but all are not saved because they refuse to be saved. If you desire to go to hell rather than enjoy the salvation Christ earned for all God will permit you to go to hell.

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyYesterday at 10:09am
Remove

Gregory L. Jackson Drew - "out of context" is a lazy way to excuse the plain words of a false teacher. I believe many in the LCMS are moving far away from HT and Georgie One Note.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply
1
Yesterday at 1:38pm
Edit
John C. Drosendahl What would the "one note" be?

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyYesterday at 4:35pm
Remove
Drew Newman As I said, I know George and have heard him speak many times. He has never taught universalism in all the times I've heard him speak. He has never implied that works do not proceed from one who is a believer in Jesus. I have yet, BTW, not met anyone wh...See More

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyYesterday at 4:41pm
Remove
Gregory L. Jackson John C. Drosendahl - UOJ. Everyone is forgiven. Everyone is saved, Everyone. Everyone. Everyone! Please tune up your listening skills.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply21 hrs
Edit
Gregory L. Jackson Drew Newman So this is all about Drew? Do you have trouble concentrating, focusing?

LikeShow more reactions
Reply21 hrs
Edit
Drew Newman All about Drew. Are you kidding me?

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Remove
Gregory L. Jackson Drew Newman Not at all, Drew. You abandoned the issue to talk about yourself. Irrelevant and immaterial. Is Georgie One Note a false teacher? Lots of LCMS have serious misgivings about Higher Things in general and about him in particular.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply
1
20 hrs
Edit
Drew Newman No, George is not a false teacher. I'd suggest that if you think he is you talk WITH him about this instead of talking ABOUT him here with me.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Remove
Gregory L. Jackson Drew Newman He blocked me, Drew. Sad but true. I was talking to him when he blocked me. Besides, I do not need to talk to someone who publishes his false doctrine. See the Large Catechism, if you have one, on the 10 Commandments, 8th. It's there.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply
1
20 hrs
Edit
John C. Drosendahl i just spent the week with George, and clearly you do not know him, nor his preaching and teaching whatsoever. he teaches justification of the whole world as did Isaiah, as did Paul in Romans. Your argument is with God, not with George or anyone else. ...See More

LikeShow more reactions
Reply
1
20 hrs
Remove
Gregory L. Jackson This would help several of you. Please read it at your leisure.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Edit
John C. Drosendahl Greg, you haven't a shred of evidence of "false doctrine". All I see here, charitably so, is your own misunderstanding. I suggest you read Romans and see if the Spirit is not crystal clear in inspiring Paul to teach justification of "the many" and the world.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Remove
Gregory L. Jackson John C. Drosendahl I listened to what he said and there is plenty of evidence of his poor, incompetent, and misguided leadership/

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Edit
John C. Drosendahl The author of the above also needs to repent of the very false charge implied that George is seemingly stuck in his Romanist upbringing. If you had heard him present as many times as I have on how set against the church of the antichrist he is, you would not be making such a foolish charge.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Remove
John C. Drosendahl You have listened to a few snippets, out of context no doubt, and have set yourself up as judge, in clear violation of the 8th commandment as Luther explains it in the Large Catechism. It is you, sir, who need to repent, confess, and receive absolution...See More

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrsEdited
Remove
Gregory L. Jackson He sounds exactly like Pope Francis, the material cited on the original post, which the Enthusiasts are busy ignoring.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Edit
John C. Drosendahl I'm sure you sound like roman catlicks too whenever you say "God is love" as they do, but it would be foolish of me to accuse you of heresy just because the roman blind hog finds the same occasional acorn that you find.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrsEdited
Remove
Gregory L. Jackson John C. Drosendahl John, calm down. I am worried about you now. To throw slander at someone falsely (see the graphic) is itself slanderous. But I am used to it from the UOJ Stormtrooper.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Edit
John C. Drosendahl I don't know what the UOJ Stormtrooper is. I'm throwing no "slander". I'm doing what you thought you were doing but weren't. I'm pointing to your words here and telling you God has not given you to set yourself up as semi-public judge. Clearly you are unqualified for such judgments, based on the spurious charges, and pittance of evidence upon which you want to base your wrong conclusions.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Remove
Gregory L. Jackson John C. Drosendahl You are pretty frothy when you are not posting dumb jokes on FB.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Edit
John C. Drosendahl I've known George personally for the better part of 15 years. I've worked with him and know his teaching pretty much inside and out. what are your credentials, wrt George, that makes you much more of an expert than me. I'll be glad to defer to you if you know him so much better than me.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Remove
Gregory L. Jackson John C. Drosendahl For the Left, everyone is personal. All about feelings and such.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Edit
John C. Drosendahl I'll grant you the truthfulness of my jokes being dumb. But there is no froth, nor lack of calmness. Just straightforward keeping of the 8th commandment as best as I can.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Remove
Gregory L. Jackson John C. Drosendahl We can all see that, John. We are in awe of your modesty, your penetrating wit, your grasp of UOJ.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Edit
John C. Drosendahl It's not about how I "feel" one way or another. i could give you a long list of George's faults, and I'm sure he could give you and even longer list of mine. It's about objective facts, of which you have very little. Put up or shut up. You post a bit out of context, jump to an egregious conclusion, and then are surprised when one asks for more context or evidence, which you allude to , but clearly don't have.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Remove
Gregory L. Jackson Luther set me up to judge false doctrine, and the Concordists thought his comments were worth publishing. Once again, read it carefully.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Edit
Gregory L. Jackson John C. Drosendahl - Read the post. It is there.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Edit
Gregory L. Jackson And this - http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/.../rolf...

Ichabod the Glory Has Departed is dedicated to…
ICHABODTHEGLORYHASDEPARTED.BLOGSPOT.COM

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyRemove Preview20 hrs
Edit
John C. Drosendahl NOBODY is ever in awe of me, for any reason. for that I'm sure. I've tried to get into Christian news for years to no avail. But nice try at skirting "the facts". 

I read the post, three times. it's a "snippet". it's out of context. it's a very tiny part of everything George Borghardt teaches. To jump to wild conclusions from such a miniscule piece of evidence embarrasses you.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Remove
Gregory L. Jacksonhttp://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/.../higher...

Ichabod the Glory Has Departed is dedicated to dealing with the issues of apostasy in American…
ICHABODTHEGLORYHASDEPARTED.BLOGSPOT.COM

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyRemove Preview20 hrs
Edit
John C. Drosendahl As for the 8th commandment from the Large Catechism, I just read it "in it's entireity", not just the snippet you want to focus on. Read the parts for yourself which address your error of setting yourself up as judge when God has not given you to do so, particularly when your evidence is so shoddy.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Remove
Gregory L. Jackson I am sure you will name those parts in an upcoming FB joke, John C. Drosendahl.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Edit
John C. Drosendahl I've read also the Surburg and BJS spurrious  (sic) claims of 3 degrees of separation between HT and some who teach false doctrine. I'm sure I have a couple of facebook friends whose theology is not pure. You are friends with me. That places you one degree closer to heretics. I should unfriend you because of such a close association with such dangersome folks.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs
Remove
John C. Drosendahl You know me well enough, Greg, to assume correctly that I find little that is "off limits" to humor. 

LikeShow more reactions
Reply20 hrs