Friday, April 20, 2018

How Do the Lutheran Leaders Respond to Justification without Faith, Election without Faith?


Total Depravity (also known as Total Inability and Original Sin)
Unconditional Election - Walther's Election without Faith
Limited Atonement (also known as Particular Atonement)
Irresistible Grace - Walther's Justification without Faith
Perseverance of the Saints (also known as Once Saved Always Saved)

 Walther seemed to think that attacking faith in Christ equaled praise for the grace of God, but one does not oppose the other. Walther wrote in the style of Calvin, as if he alone glorified God with his peculiar (albeit second-hand) notions.
Harrison's election (without faith) campaign consisted of praising all his alleged influences as the bulwark of LCMS dogma. Luther? Melanchthon? Chemnitz?

To be Steadfast Lutherans, one must promote the Calvinism of Walther and shun the Means of Grace in Luther. Wilken once denied being pals with McCain, but now wants to build a statue to His Corpulence, Paul the Plagiarist.
Minute mark 36.00 for Wilken's statue announcement.

Shh. I am hunting wascally wabbits that mention Ichabod.

Let us promote Walther's Justification without Faith while selling Roman Catholic books that identify true Christian doctrine with faith plus works.

Tis funny how the LCMS has bred so many mini-popes who hate one another, though knit together by election without faith. UOJ and rude behavior seems to be their common ground.
The Little Sect on the Prairie is fanatical about Justification without Faith, their history of Norwegian Pietism in perfect harmony with Calvinism. They persecuted B. Teigen for being a Lutheran - and now host the "Teigen Reformation Lectures," so give them credit for hypocrisy.


 WELS' Zarling decided that Calvin's concept of Justification  was the "Diamond of the Reformation, the Chief Article, the Master and Prince, the judge of all articles of Christianity." But his UOJ diamond has one enormous flaw - Justification by Faith is the Chief Article.

 Bivens copied the Zarling flaw, without giving credit.
In academic circles, that is plagiarism.
At Mordor, that is scholarship.

 I am not sure where this bishop is on doctrine.
One must be a 32nd degree ELDONUT and kiss the episcopal ring to attend their parties (no wives, no aspirants, no postulants, no laity) - so we can only guess. This blog has never called them NUTS - but DONUTS.
 The undersigned is an expert on DONUTS.

 Some of my research is still being used today.