Tuesday, May 14, 2019

Additional Moronic Statements from the Objective Justification Swamp

Romans 4:24 is never mentioned by these Scripture illiterates. One OJist made it read, from his perspective - "If we believe we are already forgiven" - a honest response to a dishonest dogma.


Everyone can see how Romans 5:1-2 restates the content of Romans 4, a chapter built on Genesis 15:6. Therefore, the subsequent verses in chapter 5 are also Justification by Faith.

LutherQuest (sic)
"Hermann Sasse was one of many Lutherans who thought that Missouri's understanding of justification was erroneous. Deniers of objective justification will tirelessly point to statements such as that of Chemnitz's disciple and champion of the Book of Concord at Wittenberg, Polycarp Leyser, who stated: 

"Although the treasury of the expiation of sins has been obtained for them and has been offered in the Gospel, it has never been conferred upon them because of their unbelief, neither has it ever been received by them, because they lack faith, the only means to receive the forgiveness of sins." 

This is an orthodox Lutheran statement. Although it is directed against Huber's doctrine of universal election, it is not in any way inconsistent with objective/subjective justification terminology. Leyser is saying, in effect: 

Although reconciliation and justification (the treasury of the forgiveness of sins) has been obtained for them (through the cross and resurrection) and presented in the Gospel (the Word of God as means of grace), it has not been conferred or received by them because faith is needed to receive justification. 

That's pretty much a definition of objective and subjective justification."


*** 
GJ - 

GJ - No Leyser is not regurgitating an OJ that never existed until Pietism, many years later.

Here is the basis for every expression of Objective Justification, Universal Objective Justification, General Justification, and Justification of the World.

What word is in common here? - Justification, a judicial proclamation.

Every flavor of OJ is the same - God has proclaimed the entire world free of sin, absolved, regardless of faith or the Word or the Spirit at work in the Gospel.

Only a dodo would claim that universal forgiveness and salvation are the Gospel, or that an editor of the Book of Concord taught OJ.

S.S. would have us believe that Leyser was an OJ advocate who crushed Samuel Huber the crypto-Calvinist OJ advocate. They should have been pals, like Cascione and McCain and Otten and Scaer. 




Galatians 3:6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. 7 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. 8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed.9 So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. 10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. 11 But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.


So Much Denial - LQ Cannot Say "Justification by Faith"

 Those labels are so familiar. Knapp, at Halle, never denied OJ. An ELS pastor was peeved that I did not give proper credit to the Calvinist translator who used these terms. But aha, the lectures themselves speak glowingly of Universal Justification. Why am I the only one who reads old books? I own it.




GJ - I am addressing the baloney copied below because it is too thick and putrid to interrupt with the Chief Article. I will just put in some markers so readers can find what I am addressing.

๐Ÿ˜€"Denial of objective justification" - The Chief Article is not the OJ of Pietism and Calvinism but Justification by Faith, from Genesis 15:6 through the Bible.

๐Ÿ˜† Refusal to use Biblical terms is seen as a license to engage in dishonest doctrinal history, which strangely avoids the Reformation. How did so many men go to college and seminary without reading the basics of the Bible? The Scriptures judge all books, so chanting from the dogmatic, self-serving Synodical Conference tomes is far from convincing. In fact, it reveals the insecurity of their baseless convictions. Samuel Huber, their saint, was a Calvinist. All their dogmatic points come from Pietism, from Halle. They refuse to touch Genesis 15:6, Abraham in the New Testament, Romans 3 - 5. The real founder of Missouri was a syphilitic hound-dog who shared his disease with his wife, children (via his dying wife), and young women of the Stephanite migration. The LCMS theologian, CFW Walther B.A., was his pimp and then his kidnapper and robber. Thus the morals and ethics of OJ.

๐Ÿ˜Ž I am not going to address the superficial skip through the Bible golden book provided by the OJ salesman. I have already addressed those points and published extensive Scriptural study of the main passages. It will be in print fairly soon.

Citing Luther is hilarious beyond belief, and I have dealt with many bow-legged, slack-jawed, sissified OJ salesmen. Thus my cool sunglasses look. I may even buy a pair.

The source cited is the Smalcald Articles, written by Luther, anticipating a conference with the papists, and included in the Book of Concord.

 Luther, Melanchthon, and Chemnitz agree that the Chief Article is Justification by Faith. Did Luther flip in the Smalcald Articles and no one noticed?


THE SECOND PART
Treats of the Articles which Refer to the Office and Work of Jesus Christ, or Our Redemption.

Part II, Article I: The first and chief article.

GJ - What is the first and chief article?

The quotations are all about the Atonement, but the rationalistic Pietists merge the Atonement and Justification, making a mess out of both. Why? They are loyal to their criminal founders, Stephan and Walther, and have never grown beyond the meager Biblical knowledge and dishonest behavior of those saints.

They must preserve their dogma and myths, so they cannot even see when their arguments defeat their OJ.

I have already addressed the Preusian follies many times. Rolfie One-Note wants everyone to read his North Dakota lectures, where he failed to even mention his father's last book, Justification and Rome, which he edited with his OJ brother, Dan.

Steve Schmidt (Sschmidt) 
Advanced Member
Username: Sschmidt




To address your questions specifically: 

๐Ÿ˜†Denial of objective justification has its roots in the Iowa and Ohio Synods, which also opposed Missouri in the Predestinarian controversy. While not as deficient in confessional Lutheranism as the Pennsylvania based General Synod (they did oppose the Four Points), these synods were error ridden in the doctrines of justification and predestination. The theological legacy of both synods descended to the ALC and then the ELCA. The ELCA has never presented an official teaching on objective justification. Deniers of objective justification usually have roots in one of the predecessor denominations of the ELCA (ALC, LCA). 

Characteristic of these predecessor bodies was a belief in election "in view of faith," which started with Aegidius Hunnius and passed through Gerhardt into scholastic Lutheran orthodoxy. Election in view of faith was a speculation developed to combat Calvinistic double predestination, but it is not biblical. Those who mock objective justification because Luther never used the term seemingly have no problem with the idea of election in view of faith, which Luther also never expressed (see Bondage of the Will). Significantly, Arminian Protestants, who influenced the General, Ohio, and Iowa Synods, all interpret election in view of faith. 

Time and basic reading comprehension of the Formula of Concord on Election has proven Missouri correct. Walther went back to Lucas Osiander, translator of the Formula of Concord into Latin, for support, which is essentially FC SD XI point by point. 

The caricature of objective justification is that Christ died for all, which universally justifies all, and so our job is to choose, in the vein of Protestant decision theology, to believe it. A legacy of sloppy theology from the WELS and the Kokomo Theses actually have lent a certain plausibility to this caricature. It is, in the end, a false caricature. 

Also at issue is where the term came from. The Age of Orthodoxy was a scholastic period that endlessly analyzed and subdivided doctrine for polemical reasons. Objective justification was a term used, at times correctly and incorrectly, from the time of Osiander to the present. Its use testifies that Lutherans were aware that justification is both a Second and Third Article doctrine. The Bible emphatically teaches that the Lamb of God takes away the sin of the world. Being found without sin is justification. It also teaches that our sin places us under God's wrath and judgment. But I thought my sins were nailed to the cross (Colossians 2:14, Hebrews 10)? That they indeed were. The New Testament is full of verses about the atonement. Deniers of objective justification don't know what the atonement means (Hello, Gustaf Aulรฉn!). The atonement means your sins are forgiven. 

"He was raised for our justification." What does this mean? Luther tells us what it means. He preached two or three recorded sermons on this topic. It means Christ has died to take away our sins once and for all. It means God raises Christ so that he lives victorious over sin. To be victorious over sin and death is to be justified. Now, is Christ alone justified? By no means. By dying, our sins, not his, were forgiven. By rising, that is conquering death, hell, and sin, we have conquered death, hell, and sin. 

18 Consequently, just as one trespass resulted in condemnation for all people, so also one righteous act resulted in justification and life for all people. (Rom 5:18) 

8 But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. 
9 Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God’s wrath through him! 10 For if, while we were God’s enemies, we were reconciled to him through the death of his Son, how much more, having been reconciled, shall we be saved through his life! 11 Not only is this so, but we also boast in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received reconciliation. (Rom 5:8-11) 

Here Paul teaches that while still sinners, we all were reconciled by the death of his Son and justified by his blood (Second Article). This is objectively true. It happened 2000 years ago. What does it mean that now justified, forgiven and reconciled, we shall be saved by his life? It means that the Holy Spirit grants us the gift of faith in Christ to apprehend this treasure (Third Article). Subjective justification comes through faith. 

Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, 2 through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand. (Rom 5:1-2a) 
๐Ÿ˜Ž
Luther laid out this "order of salvation" in the Smalcald Articles, on The Chief Article [justification]: 

1] That Jesus Christ, our God and Lord, died for our sins, and was raised again for our justification, Rom. 4:25. 

2] And He alone is the Lamb of God which taketh away the sins of the world, John 1:29; and God has laid upon Him the iniquities of us all, Is. 53:6. 

3] Likewise: All have sinned and are justified without merit [freely, and without their own works or merits] by His grace, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, in His blood, Rom. 3:23f 

4] Now, since it is necessary to believe this, and it cannot be otherwise acquired or apprehended by any work, law, or merit, it is clear and certain that this faith alone justifies us as St. Paul says, Rom. 3:28: For we conclude that a man is justified by faith, without the deeds of the Law. Likewise 3:26: That He might be just, and the Justifier of him which believeth in Christ. 

Therefore, since the Bible and Confessions speak of justification as being the office of Christ ("raised for our justification," that is, to stand triumphant over all sin), "by grace" (the mercy of God), "for all" (all have sinned and are justified), "through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus" (Atonement), "in His blood" (the Crucifixion), and also that "since it is necessary to believe this," that is to say, it is through faith alone that we acquire this justification individually (to be "in Christ"), we freely use the terms "objective" and "subjective" justification to fully describe the entire plan of salvation that is the chief article of the church. 

Luther: 

"But when I come to understand the fact that all the works God does in Christ are done for me, nay, they are bestowed upon and given to me, the effect of his resurrection being that I also will arise and live with him; that will cause me to rejoice." 

"But since Christ died for our sins and was raised for our justification, we cannot see it nor feel it, neither can we comprehend it with our reason. Therefore we must disregard our feeling and accept only the Word, write it into our heart and cling to it, even though it seems as if my sins were not taken from me, and even though I still feel them within me. Our feelings must not be considered, but we must constantly insist that death, sin and hell have been conquered, although I feel that I am still under the power of death, sin and hell. For although we feel that sin is still in us, it is only permitted that our faith may be developed and strengthened, that in spite of all our feelings we accept the Word, and that we unite our hearts and consciences more and more to Christ."


LutherQuest (sic) Bares Its Fangs.
How WAM II Was Beaten Like a Rented Mule for Teaching Justification by Faith

  Exactly where in the Bible is this Dreck taught?




Daniel Iwinski (Polishlutheran)
Junior Member
Username: Polishlutheran

Post Number: 44
Registered: 12-2005
Posted on Tuesday, May 14, 2019 - 11:07 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post


I know lots can and has been written about this subject, especially here on LutherQuest. I know Greg Jackson denies universal objective justification. I am assuming he believes Jesus died for the whole world and the world's sins have been atoned for. Is his take simply the "in view of faith" doctrine? Does he believe faith is still a gift of God created and worked in an individual? Thanks in advance for any insight.

GJ - "In view of faith" is not a Biblical doctrine. It is a slogan used in a cowardly way to attack Justification by Faith, the Chief Article, which term they largely ignore, except when using it to confuse people with OJ, SJ, UOJ, General Justification,  and Justification of the World. Pieper, Mueller, and David Scaer combine the three terms to confuse the issue and snarl for their own little hobby horse, Objective Justification.

---
Someone on LQ directed the probie to Robert Preus' pratfall.

Dr. Robert Preus on JustificationBy Rev. Jack Cascione

Dr. Greg Jackson has repeatedly stated on Luther Quest that Dr. Robert Preus was not in agreement with Objective Justification. [GJ - False - I repeatedly stated Preus was for OJ before he was against OJ - in Justification and Rome.]  
I served as the PR Flack for Fort Wayne from 1978-1981. “Missouri In Perspective” the ELIM paper, criticized the LC-MS position on Objective Justification. As editor for the Concordia Theological Seminary - Fort Wayne “News Letters” I asked Dr. Preus to respond in the Spring 1981 Issue. [GJ - Note Jack's preening. Preus obeyed him!] The following is his reply, plus other relative excerpts.

 McCain also pitched for this absurd statement.
 Part of the post is below - found at this link:

CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
NEWSLETTER – Spring 1981\
6600 North Clinton
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46825


THE PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE – "OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION"

The doctrine of objective justification is a lovely teaching drawn from Scripture which tells us that God who has loved us so much that He gave His only to be our Savior has for the sake of Christ’s substitutionary atonement declared the entire world of sinners for whom Christ died to be righteous (Romans 5:17-19). [GJ - Note that the Atonement is not OJ.]
Objective justification which is God’s verdict of acquittal over the whole world is not identical with the atonement, it is not another way of expressing the fact that Christ has redeemed the world. Rather it is based upon the substitutionary work of Christ, or better, it is a part of the atonement itself. It is God’s response to all that Christ died to save us, God’s verdict that Christ’s work is finished, that He has been indeed reconciled, propitiated; His anger has been stilled and He is at peace with the world, and therefore He has declared the entire world in Christ to be righteous.

THE SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT
According to all of Scripture Christ made a full atonement for the sins of all mankind. Atonement (at-one-ment) means reconciliation. If God was not reconciled by the saving work of Christ, if His wrath against sin was not appeased by Christ'’ sacrifice, if God did not respond to the perfect obedience and suffering and death of His Son for the sins of the world by forgiveness, by declaring the sinful world to be righteous in Christ -–if all this were not so, if something remains to be done by us or through us or in us, then there is no finished atonement. [GJ - Notice all the "ifs" without any Scriptureal support.] But Christ said, "It is finished." And God raised Him from the dead and justified Him, pronounced Him, the sin bearer, righteous (I Timothy 3:16) and thus in Him pronounced the entire world of sinners righteous (Romans 4:25). [GJ - Romans 4:24 and Romans 5:1-2 demolish all this drivel.]
All this is put beautifully by an old Lutheran theologian of our church, [GJ - who left for the Church of Rome] "We are redeemed from the guilt of sin; the wrath of God is appeased; all creation is again under the bright rays of mercy, as in the beginning; yea, in Christ we were justified before we were even born. For do not the Scriptures say: ‘God was in Christ reconciling the world unto Himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them?'’ This is not the justification which we receive by faith...That is the great absolution which took place in the resurrection of Christ. It was the Father, for our sake, who condemned His dear Son as the greatest of all sinners causing Him to suffer the greatest punishment of the transgressors, even so did He publicly absolve Him from the sins of the world when He raised Him up from the dead." (Edward Preuss, "The Justification of a Sinner Before God," pp. 14-15)

The entire world is righteous at the resurrection of Christ - advocated by Halle Pietists, Rambach, Knapp, Bishop Stephan, Walther, Edward Preuss and Robert Preus.
1 Timothy 3:16 does not teach this - Chemnitz.


OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION AND JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH
The doctrine of objective justification does not imply that there is no hell, that God’s threats throughout Scripture to punish sins are empty, or that all unbelievers will not be condemned to eternal death on the day of Christ’s second coming. And very definitely the doctrine of objective, or general, justification does not threaten the doctrine of justification through faith in Christ. [GJ - So why did they ban WAM II from teaching Romans? Hmmm?] Rather it is the very basis of that Reformation doctrine, a part of it. For it is the very pardon which God has declared over the whole world of sinners that the individual sinner embraces in faith and thus is justified personally. Christ’s atonement, His propitiation of God and God’s forgiveness are the true and only object of faith. Here is what George Stoekhardt, perhaps the greatest of all Lutheran biblical expositors in our country, [GJ - hardly!] says, "Genuine Lutheran theology counts the doctrine of general (objective) justification among the statements and treasures of its faith. Lutherans teach and confess that through Christ’s death the entire world of sinners was justified and that through Christ’s resurrection the justification of the sinful world was festively proclaimed. This doctrine of general justification is the guarantee and warranty that the central article of justification by faith is being kept pure. Whoever holds firmly that God was reconciled to the world in Christ, and that to sinners in general their sin was forgiven, to him the justification which comes from faith remains a pure act of the grace of God. Whoever denies general justification is justly under suspicion that he is mixing his own work and merit into the grace of God." [GJ - Thus the Chief Article is always "denying OJ."]

THE REALITY OF OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION
Objective justification is not a mere metaphor, a figurative way of expressing the fact that Christ died for all and paid for the sins of all. Objective justification has happened, it is the actual acquittal of the entire world of sinners for Christ’s sake. Neither does the doctrine of objective justification refer to the mere possibility of the individual’s justification through faith, to a mere potentiality which faith completes when one believes in Christ. Justification is no more a mere potentiality or possibility than Christ’s atonement. The doctrine of objective justification points to the real justification of all sinners for the sake of Christ’s atoning work "before" we come to faith in Christ. Nor is objective justification "merely" a "Lutheran term" to denote that justification is available to all as a recent "Lutheran Witness" article puts it – although it is certainly true that forgiveness is available to all. Nor is objective justification a Missouri Synod construct, a "theologoumenon" (a theological peculiarity), devised cleverly to ward off synergism (that man cooperates in his conversion) and Calvinistic double predestination, as Dr. Robert Schultz puts it in "Missouri in Perspective" (February 23, 1981, p. 5) – although the doctrine does indeed serve to stave off these two aberrations. No, objective justification is a clear teaching of Scripture, it is an article of faith which no Lutheran has any right to deny or pervert any more than the article of the Trinity or of the vicarious atonement.

THE CENTRAILITY AND COMFORT OF THE DOCTRINE
Objective justification is not a peripheral article of faith which one may choose to ignore because of more important things. It is the very central article of the Gospel which we preach. Listen to Dr. C. F. W. Walther, the first president and great leader of our synod, speak about this glorious doctrine in one of his magnificent Easter sermons: "When Christ suffered and died, He was judged by God, and He was condemned to death in our place. But when God in the resurrection awakened Him again, who was it then that was acquitted by God in Christ’s person? Christ did no need acquittal for Himself, for no one can accuse Him of single sin. Who therefore was it that was justified in Him? Who was declared pure and innocent in Him? We were, we humans. It was the whole world. When God spoke to Christ, ‘You shall live,’ that applied to us. His life is our life. His acquittal, our acquittal, His justification, our justification….Who can ever fully express the great comfort which lies in Christ’s resurrection? It is God’s own absolution spoken to all men, to all sinners, in a word, to all the world, and sealed in the most glorious way. There the eternal love of God is revealed in all its riches, in its overflowing fullness and in its highest brilliance. For there we hear that it was not enough for God simply to send His own Son into the world and let Him become a man for us, not enough even for Him to give and offer His only Son unto death for us. No, when His Son had accomplished all that He had to do and suffer in order to earn and acquire grace and life and blessedness for us, then God, in His burning love to speak to us sinners, could not wait until we would come to Him and request His grace in Christ, but no sooner had His Son fulfilled everything than He immediately hastened to confer to men the grace which had been acquired through the resurrection of His Son, to declare openly, really and solemnly to all men that they were acquitted of all their sins, and to declare before heaven and earth that they are redeemed, reconciled, pure, innocent and righteous in Christ."

THE ISSUE AT OUR SEMINARY
Many of our readers know that our seminary, and one professor in particular, has been recently criticized for undermining this comforting and clear teaching of objective justification. The criticism and garbled accounts of the situation have become so widespread lately that I must now comment on the matter in this issue of the "Newsletter.
For over 15 years now Professor Walter A. Maier, Jr., has been teaching a course in the book of Romans, and, although he states he has always presented the doctrine of objective justification as taught in our synod (e.g. in the "Brief Statement"), he has taught in class that some of the key passages used in our church to support the doctrine actually do not speak to the subject at all. As a result some within the seminary community and some outside concluded that Dr. Maier did not in fact believe, teach, and confess the article of objective justification. A few – very few – complaints were brought against Dr. Maier and against the seminary for letting this go on.
The president of our synod, who has the responsibility for supervising doctrine in the synod, contacted me and asked me to try to settle the issue and to persuade Dr. Maier to teach an interpretation of the pertinent passages (Romans 4:25; Romans 5:16-19; II Corinthians 5:19) compatible with that which the great teachers of our church in the past (C. F. W. Walther, Francis Pieper, Theodore Engelder, George Stoeckhardt, Martin Franzmann, William Beck and others) publicly taught. Meetings and discussions immediately took place between Dr. Maier and myself. Later on the matter was considered in faculty meetings, in department meetings, and in special committees appointed to discuss and hopefully to settle the issue. During these meetings, which were always most cordial, Dr. Maier has remained unpersuaded that his interpretation of the pertinent passages is faulty. At the same time he has consistently assured all that he has always taught the doctrine of objective justification as understood in the Missouri Synod. He has, however, referred to other biblical evidence for the doctrine.
In the meantime the president of the synod, growing anxious for a clear solution to the problem wrote to the entire church body a letter cautioning congregations not to nominate Dr. Maier for president of the synod until the issue was cleared up to his satisfaction.
Now the issue became political, and protests and criticisms against the president of the synod for his action and also against Dr. Maier'’ teaching began to multiply all over the synod. People naturally began to take sides, not always so much on the doctrinal issue which was not always understood and is still being discussed at our seminary, but for ecclesiastical and personal reasons. We now know that the warning of our synodical president against Dr. Maier not only failed to dissuade congregations from nominating Dr. Maier for the presidency of our synod (as Fourth Vice-President Dr. Robert Sauer had forewarned when attempting to persuade the synodical president not to send his letter), but possibly gained more nominations for Dr. Maier. Dr. Maier is now one of the five men nominated for the presidency of our synod. [GJ - Now we begin to smell the potroast. This was a blatant sandbagging effort to destroy Walter A. Maier II for teaching what his father taught all over American - Justification by Faith.]
On January 30, 1981, the Board of Control met with Dr. Maier and three representatives of the synodical praesidium (which had severely criticized Dr. Maier’s doctrinal stance). We heard from two members of the praesidium and then from Dr. Maier and two faculty members who he had requested to accompany him. The results of this meeting, many of us believed, represented a real breakthrough in understanding, and the Board exonerated Dr. Maier of any false doctrine. It was my belief that the representatives of the praesidium present were also satisfied and happy with the report. In the discussions of this meeting Dr. Maier expressed many genuine concerns related to the doctrine of objective justification, e.g., that no one is saved eternally who is not justified by faith, that God is even now angry with those who reject Christ and do not repent, and that objective justification ought to be preached and taught in such a way that the biblical doctrine of justification by faith is always prominent. The report, in the form of a news release, is found on page 4 of the "Newsletter", and I urge the reader to read it because "The Reporter," "The Lutheran Witness," and most of the newspapers over the country which reported on the matter did not reproduce the report in its entirety. At the same meeting the Board of Control strongly expressed its disapproval of some of the actions of our synodical president in the matter.
Meanwhile the administration of the seminary, with the concurrence of the Board of Control, determined that it would be best for the seminary and for Dr. Maier if he not teach the course in Romans during the next academic year. At first I tried to keep this matter private, but later I decided to make a public report of the fact. My reason for this was threefold. First, Dr. Maier was reported in the news media all over the country as stating that he had not changed his position on the doctrine of objective justification, suggesting o many that three years of discussions with him had been quite fruitless and that he still did not wholeheartedly believe in objective justification. Second, several people sympathetic to Dr. Maier had threatened to withhold funds from the seminary and had even reported our action to the accrediting association of our seminary, "The Association of Theological Schools;" it was obvious to me that they would make the matter of Dr. Maier’s courses public whenever it served their purposes. Third, the president of the synod was preparing a release revealing the fact that Dr. Maier would not be teaching Romans during the next academic year. I thought it would be preferable that the president of the seminary make this fact known rather than those who have no business making such and announcement and who might make the announcement in a way detrimental either Dr. Maier or the seminary.
This is where the matter now stands. The Board of Control has stated its confidence in the doctrine of Dr. Maier. Dr. Maier is presently teaching Romans, will teach the course this summer, but is slated to teach courses other than Romans next year. The faculty will continue to discuss and try to achieve total agreement in the interpretation of those passages of Scripture which teach objective justification.

Judge for Yourselves - Robert Preus turned away from Pietism's Objective Justification in his last book.





Monday, May 13, 2019

Roses on Mother's Day and the Hidden Path


We have had so much rain that I lost track of the totals. A few Little Joe Pye Weed and Fever Few came in the mail, so I planted them just before another storm arrived.

The rain made it possible to distribute our roses this year for Mother's Day. The two Easy Does It rose bushes held 25 buds each on Saturday, so I did not need to buy extra from Walmart.

I delivered to every home in our cul-de-sac, using a drink cup and water for each rose. The mother of four daughters received a bouquet of four, with one stem loaded with additional buds.

Most people were not up at 7 AM, but one woman waited in the driveway with her daughter for hers. She said, "For me?" I gave her the rose and said, "Happy Mother's Day." She beamed and gave me a hug.

Sassy drove with me for additional deliveries. One went to a police officer's wife. The others went to Pat and her new neighbor. The neighbor was out with her rescue dog. Pat and her husband John always look for Sassy. She kisses their hands each time, and they love that. Pat told me an interesting story.

 Easy Does It is in the middle.


The Hidden Path
"Did you know about the path? No? Our neighbors just moved in and the father started digging between the sidewalk and the street. Did you see that? You will never guess what was under that thick layer of mud and grass -  a brick path to the mailbox and the street. We have been here for years and never suspected that. Now all the debris is dug away and they can walk to their mailbox on that brick path. How about that?"

Later that day, Pat's story stuck me as the perfect analogy for the almost complete loss of Justification by Faith. No article of faith is plainer in the Bible, Luther's Sermons, or the Book of Concord. But two centuries of Pietism, Calvinism, and Rationalism have covered the Biblical doctrine with enough mud and debris to hide it almost completely under a layer of growth. All the books and essays - with a few exceptions - have added to that accumulation. These contributions to the opaque layer came from the "conservative" Synodical Conference and later from the modernists who aped the rationalism of Europeans.

Someone could easily conclude from the 60 essays in the WELS Essay File that Justification by Faith does not exist. The opponents do not identify their nemesis, or attack it, lest people start digging for the truth.



Sunday, May 12, 2019

Jubilate - The Third Sunday after Easter, 2019. Mother's Day.
John 16:16-23


Jubilate, The Third Sunday after Easter, 2019


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson



Note - the hymn lyrics are linked on the hymn number, the tune linked on the hymn's name. 

The Hymn #  536               Awake My Soul 
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn # 
518    If Thou But Suffer God To Guide Thee

A Little While - Times Seven 


The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #231         We Now Implore                     

THIRD SUNDAY OF EASTER

Lord God, heavenly Father, who of Thy fatherly goodness dost suffer Thy children to come under Thy chastening rod here on earth, that we may be like unto Thine only-begotten Son in suffering and hereafter in glory: We beseech Thee, comfort us in temptations and afflictions by Thy Holy Spirit, that we may not fall into despair, but that we may continually trust in Thy Son's promise, that our trials will endure but a little while, and will then be followed by eternal joy; that we thus, in patient hope, may overcome all evil, and at last obtain eternal salvation, through the same, Thy Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.


KJV 1 Peter 2:11 Dearly beloved, I beseech you as strangers and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts, which war against the soul; 12 Having your conversation honest among the Gentiles: that, whereas they speak against you as evildoers, they may by your good works, which they shall behold, glorify God in the day of visitation. 13 Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme; 14 Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well. 15 For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men: 16 As free, and not using your liberty for a cloke of maliciousness, but as the servants of God. 17 Honour all men. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honour the king. 18 Servants, be subject to your masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froward. 19 For this is thankworthy, if a man for conscience toward God endure grief, suffering wrongfully. 20 For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God.

KJV John 16:16 A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me, because I go to the Father. 17 Then said some of his disciples among themselves, What is this that he saith unto us, A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me: and, Because I go to the Father? 18 They said therefore, What is this that he saith, A little while? we cannot tell what he saith. 19 Now Jesus knew that they were desirous to ask him, and said unto them, Do ye enquire among yourselves of that I said, A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me? 20 Verily, verily, I say unto you, That ye shall weep and lament, but the world shall rejoice: and ye shall be sorrowful, but your sorrow shall be turned into joy. 21 A woman when she is in travail hath sorrow, because her hour is come: but as soon as she is delivered of the child, she remembereth no more the anguish, for joy that a man is born into the world. 22 And ye now therefore have sorrow: but I will see you again, and your heart shall rejoice, and your joy no man taketh from you. 23 And in that day ye shall ask me nothing. Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my name, he will give it you.



 Josephine graduated from the university last night.
Here she is, held by my mother, who is wearing a Josephine photo button.


Sermon Background
I have often mentioned the attacks against the Gospel of John, as written centuries after Christ, influenced by Hellenistic philosophy, and definitely not from the Apostle John.

The attacks are important because they show how dangerous the Fourth Gospel is to the crafts, assaults, and deliriums of apostate Christians. The worst of these attacks have not come from the loud atheists, but from the quiet, persistent needling of former believers who lost their faith. What is more threatening that the Gospel that emphasizes faith above all - not only in the word-count of that term (faith and believe, same root in Greek) but also in content. The purpose of John's Gospel is to establish faith in the Jesus the Son of God, and that in believing, people might have eternal life.

The Fourth Gospel is the one that ties all four together, harmonizes with the others but also adds the most important insights and warnings against against future doctrinal errors. Knock that out and the first three have less clout, and people wonder, "If John is not reliable, what about these three?"

But look at this lesson all by itself - better if read with these remarkable going-away sermons - but also, just by itself. What better indication is there than this - that Jesus loved His disciples to the end - and that He teaches us a lesson while teaching them. The lesson is - a little while. The small word in Greek has a longish phrase in Englist - a little while ฮผฮนฮบฯฮฟฮฝ - as in microwave, microbiology, microbe.

Jesus' technique is simple - repetition. The same word is found seven times in this passage. "How many times do I have to tell you?" is ingrained in the memories of children whose mothers used repetition.


A Little While - Times Seven 


KJV John 16:16 A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me, because I go to the Father.

Luther said this word - a little while - is used so often in this one passage that it becomes annoying. I have had kids count them off during the reading.

I have contended that Jesus knew a lot about education methods, because He used them so effectively. He used little short stories (parables), and analogies from the customs of the time (the Good Shepherd), and short, descriptive words (a little while). Some are saying, "Of course, He did. He is the Creating Word." But I am saying that I lead my secular class in adult education back to His methods. I have a class of professing Christians and they catch on.

The context of this passage is important because:
  1. It is a going away sermon, and the last words of leaders are especially significant in the Bible, as they often are today.
  2. The disciples were facing a terrible trial, losing Jesus to arrest, torture, and death, leaving them weak and unafraid.
We are an impatient society, always in a hurry to be ahead instead of enjoying the moment, the abundant life God gives us. During our extra-cold winter, many people said, "I can't wait for warm weather." I was thinking and saying, "No I can wait to enjoy each day as spring approaches." I watch Creation unfold on our morning walks. The entire garden and all the bushes seemed dead. Then plants, insects, and birds began to garnish the yard in tiny increments - early bulbs, wildflowers and weeds, robins and cardinals, bees and wasps.

I was sure the roses would be late in blooming for Mother's Day, but then the rains came, 8 inches in a few days, lots of fertilizer from the sky, and even more rain. Perhaps 50 roses are in full blooms or budded - on two Easy-Does-It bushes. New bushes are also producing. Joe Pye is preparing to welcome butterflies.

Why rush? The yardwork is zero in early spring. Now it demands more than anyone can do.

My mother was always telling me to be patient. I think our oldest granddaughter had that issue. One time, she explained to me - "Grampy, you have to wait."

Jesus was teaching the disciples that the Passion was only a little while away. And - that He would be taken from them - to the Father - after that. Both parts of the message left the grieving disciples even more alarmed as anxious. But the truth ultimately strengthens use, and this lesson was built with the same brick - a little while.

17 Then said some of his disciples among themselves, What is this that he saith unto us, A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me: and, Because I go to the Father?

One thing we can see in John's Gospel is the distance between Jesus' teaching and the comprehension of His audience. He is always far above them because He is "from above" and descended to be the Son of God in the flesh. These perplexing conversations (Nicodemus, the Woman at the Well, Peter and his feet being washed) are that much more convincing - if we catch on.

Uncertainty makes us anxious. Graduation meant driving into campus construction, with a zillion anxious relatives, to a stadium with 16,000 seats and limited parking, uncertain weather, and meeting up somehow. Then, hours later, how does one feed a family with thousands of hungry grads and relatives pouring out from the same location? And it all went well. 

One person was happy to save the day in two ways, first we got an up to date handicap sign to park next to the stadium. Secondly, the same person went to the restaurant to save a table for us while we were escaping graduation traffic, which saved a 45 minute wait. That was my best English student locally, a wife, mother, aunt, and future nurse. Absent that help, which was thrust on us, it could have been as anxious as I imagined. And that is how God works, as Jesus explained then and does now.

18 They said therefore, What is this that he saith, A little while? we cannot tell what he saith. 19 Now Jesus knew that they were desirous to ask him, and said unto them, Do ye enquire among yourselves of that I said, A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me?

1. Here in this Gospel we see how the Lord comforts and imparts courage to his children whom he is about to leave behind him, when they would come in fear and distress on account of his death or of their backsliding. We also notice what induced the evangelist John to use so many words that he indeed repeats one expression four times, which according to our thinking he might have expressed in fewer words. There is first of all presented to us here the nature of the true Christian in the example of the dear apostles. In the second place, how the suffering and the resurrection of Christ are to become effective in us.

2. We also see that Christ announces to his disciples, how sorrowful they should be because he would leave them, but they are still so simpleminded and ignorant, and also so sorrowful on account of his recent conversation at the Last Supper, that they did not understand at all what he said unto them; yea, the nature of that which Christ presents to them is too great and incomprehensible for them. And it was also necessary that they should first become sorrowful before they could rejoice, even as Christ himself was an example to us that without the cross we could not enter into glory. 

Long explanations can be forgotten or mixed up easily. Jesus gave them a word, which we know as a phrase, to calm their anxiety and give them some peace in a time of turmoil - "a little while." Because it is used so often, we cannot help remembering it when the same challenges arise. But it is also good for enjoying those special, peaceful, joy-filled moments that grow in our memories as we reflect on them.

The fact remains - we do not know the future, but we know Who holds the future. That is the basis for patience - faith in our loving, gracious God, Whose power is chiefly shown in His mercy.

During a time of grief or crisis, we become confused and anxious. Experience with God's guidance helps a great deal, and the Scriptures encourage us to take all our troubles, anxieties, and pain to Him.

20 Verily, verily, I say unto you, That ye shall weep and lament, but the world shall rejoice: and ye shall be sorrowful, but your sorrow shall be turned into joy. 21 A woman when she is in travail hath sorrow, because her hour is come: but as soon as she is delivered of the child, she remembereth no more the anguish, for joy that a man is born into the world.

The childbirth analogy is difficult to misunderstand. There is always anxiety and pain, so the time leading up to childbirth is a genuine trial. 

Jesus predicted that His disciples would be in mourning, weeping, and distraught. The greatest joy in their lives, the greatest meaning for them - that would be ripped away, simply because He threatened the powers of darkness with the message of faith in Him. 

Looking at the words here, the anguish of the disciples is stressed and described in detail. But in contrast, the travail of childbirth is passed over quickly because of the joy that follows. That is what we continue to hear today, even when a child must struggle to live so that everyone is anxious all the time. But when prayers are answered, the joy is overwhelming and we can see it in the baby, too. And that is just as true in those children whose conditions continue. God's love and guidance, and the family love illuminate the child, even though a thousand plagues seem to hit that little person. The spiritually blind and unbelievers cannot see it and will not look, because God hides the joyful peace from their hardened hearts.

The question is not whether our favored outcome develops, but whether we see, in faith, God's foresight and blessings.

Mothers
Mothers live a life of constant turmoil from the unceasing concern they have for their children and descendants. This hardly ever goes away and it is astonishing in those cases where a mother simply does not care. The vast majority want everything taken care of for everyone - and the best for their children.

Evolutionists intrigue me because they do not see the same characteristics in animals. It is not so clear in scorpions, but they do carry their cute little children around with them. The mammals show an overwhelming love for their children and great pride in them too. We used to show off our Siamese kittens to company, but the mother cat jumped in each lap and took each kitten back down to the basement. One night we left the kittens alone in the basement. The mother cat brought each one up, put them in the middle of the company, on the rug, and stood next to her kittens, proudly. 

Who programmed cats and dogs to be so motherly? 

21. Christ says here to his disciples, So it will also go with you. The woman is here in such a state of mind that she is fearful of great danger, and yet she knows that the whole work lies in the hands of God; in him she trusts; upon him it is she depends; he also helps her and accomplishes the work, which the whole world could not do, and she thinks of nothing but the time that shall follow, when she shall again rejoice; and her heart feels and says, A dangerous hour is at hand, but afterwards it will be well. Courage and' the heart press through all obstacles. Thus it will also be with you, when you are in sorrow and adversity, and when you become new creatures. Only quietly wait and permit God to work. He will accomplish everything without your assistance.

22. This parable of the woman is a strong and stubborn argument against free will, that it is entirely powerless and without strength in the things pertaining to the salvation of our souls. The Gospel shows very plainly that divine strength and grace are needed. Man's free will is entirely too weak and insignificant to accomplish anything here. But we have established our own orders and regulations instead of the Gospel and through these we want to free ourselves from sin, from death, from hell, and from all misfortune and finally be saved thereby. A great mistake.

22 And ye now therefore have sorrow: but I will see you again, and your heart shall rejoice, and your joy no man taketh from you. 

Sorrow comes our way. As Luther says, women are more easily moved to joy and to sorrow. One woman began crying when she suddenly saw the bulbs blooming along our garage in Midland.

Jesus assured His disciples that they would have sorrow. To care for others is a gentle burden. It weighs on us but that weight is better than the emptiness of not caring. Our nurse friend, after raising her kids, cannot wait to foster some young children. It is her nature to care and to take care of others, and she was raised by a nurse herself.

The rejoicing we experience is from getting past difficult times, from finding out they were for the best, and from learning to appreciate how short our time is with others.

As grandparents we have constant flashbacks from the grandchildren growing up, their father growing up, and the fun with had with their aunts Bethany and Erin. Each day that seems ordinary at the time often becomes special in our memories, for various reasons. 

During graduation preparation - Remember when we dropped of Brenda's computer at their place and retrieved it later? Little Josie came down the hall after it. She wanted to keep it, so she wailed for that computer.

23 And in that day ye shall ask me nothing. Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my name, he will give it you.

The entire Bible matches the Promises of God with encouragement to pray. I do not pray because I know what the outcome will be, but I put the outcome is in God's gracious hands. Experience shows His wisdom, and the Gospel moves us always to keep this - rather than man's wisdom - as our guide.