Sunday, February 9, 2020

The Final Result of Worshiping CFW Walther


Good evening Pastor Jackson,

This excerpt is from the Concordia Theological Quarterly, Volume 77:1-2, January/April 2013.
This essay from Mark Braun is entitled "The Reception of Walther's Theology in the Wisconsin Synod"

[Beginning of Quotation]
" (August) Pieper criticized Walther for an overdependence on “the secondary sources of theology―Luther and lesser fathers,” and for his willingness to take over “dozens of proof passages from Luther and the dogmaticians,” even though they “do not prove what they are supposed to prove.” Pieper considered Walther a “brilliant dogmatician” but “an inferior exegete.” However justified Walther’s method may have been at the beginning of his teaching, it was “in principle and in practice wrong” because “it did not rest directly on Scripture and did not lead one directly into it.” Though his method “did no harm to the correct doctrine of Walther and his students,” it nonetheless “stressed too strongly the importance of Luther and the Lutheran Confessions and the Lutheran fathers in comparison with Scripture.” At its worst, “it even led to this, that later one did not stop with quoting Luther and the old fathers, but now one also quoted Walther” for proof of correct doctrine. Pieper was reported as having remarked, perhaps only partly tongue-in-cheek, “We could not persuade Missourians with the Bible, but when we quoted Walther to them, then they believed us.” Recalling his own student days, Pieper charged that “the average student in Walther’s time made out poorly” in “everything except dogmatics and pastoral theology.” New Testament exegesis “consisted mainly of dictated quotations from the Lutheran exegetes of the 16th and 17th centuries.” In isagogics “the Bible itself was seldom used in class,” and so “students came out of the seminary without having the slightest ability in exegesis” and “had not ever studied a single book of Holy Scripture some
what thoroughly.” 

Pieper did not reject the legitimate role of systematic theology; in a review of Schaller’s Biblical Christology in 1919, Pieper wrote that underestimating the value of doctrinal theology was “one of the gravest mistakes the Church could make.” History and exegesis provide the necessary foundation and “a full knowledge [of the] Gospel,” but “systematic theology must shape its form, and give it the proper finish.” Dogmatics fostered “accuracy of thought and the precision of logical expression peculiar,” making it “an indispensable study and a most potent factor in the training of masterly minds.”  Yet Pieper repeatedly voiced warnings against the dangers inherent in dogmatic theology. “The systemizing tendency of Lutheran dogmatics emphasized” the importance of Scripture “in principle but in the application often failed. And the more they systematized, the greater was the damage. Ever since Calixtus, everything had to fit into the logical straightjacket.” The dogmaticians “learned the disinguendam est [‘a distinction must be made’] to the minutest detail and―without any evil intention―damaged Scripture here and there.” 

While dogmatics is “altogether indispensable” for keeping the gospel pure, it is also “is in constant danger of losing the spirit of the gospel and becoming a dead skeleton as a result of processes that involve the intellect alone.” Dogma becomes “the word crystallized into an inflexible form” that “does not express the full content of Scripture.”  Koehler likewise warned that “dogmatic training” and “the dogmatism it produces will establish an array of doctrinal theses and make an outward rule of them, without probing their deep content and inner connection.” Worse, “it will seek, by means of a supposed logical reasoning, to achieve a connected system of thought, whereby in fact Biblical truth is emptied of it content and the resulting Christian knowledge and life is left superficial. This overemphasis on dogmatic theology and a corresponding neglect of exegetical theology helped to create what many outsiders referred to as                                                          
the “Missouri spirit,” evident “in hundreds of concrete cases, in raising suspicions about doctrine, in dead silence about the boycotting of nonsynodical literature, in competition in the area of foreign mission work, in a smug tone of criticism of non-synodical church institutions and theological accomplishments and in all kinds of scornful talk and remarks.” Most likely referring to his own synod, August Pieper charged that “this attitude is taken not only toward the synods that have remained hostile, but also toward those that in the course of time were recognized as sufficiently Lutheran.” This attitude “confronts even the friends of the Missouri Synod again and again to the present day.” 
[End of Quotation]

I apologize for the length of the quote. I wanted to keep it all within context. Koehler, August Pieper and John Schaller went to the seminary in St. Louis. They all had Walther as an instructor there. I will continue to keep you and Mrs. Jackson in my prayers.

In Christ

 I adjusted the title because Stephan left as a criminal, not because he was searching for religious freedom in America.

LCMS myth-minders are not happy that this book is so frank, yet the real story of Stephan's STD and Walther's cover-up has not been told.

LutherQueasies Falling Over Each Other To Defend Matt Harrison's Objective Justification Drivel, Adding Their Own Drool

 How dare he wield the Sword of the Spirit when we have the complete works of CFW Walther, B.A.!
The Enthusiasm Works, LLC, aka LutherQuacks, seemed incoherent with rage when I pointed out the ridiculousness of Walther's Law and Gospel thesis.

They began by defending Matt Harrison's Objective Justification drivel, then turned against my clarifying, gentle, and diplomatic comments about the kidnapper-pimp, CFW himself.

Their website, powered by recycled Fritos, does not have the horsepower to present graphics or Greek. Their extended rants do not have an appealing look when the site is only good for trivia, biting and devouring.

One MDiv pointed out that Harrison (or his ghost-writer) could not assemble a decent Biblical argument for Justification without Faith. As I tell my graduate students, "At least make a good argument, using logic, plain sentences, and research." Harrison (or McCain) missed on all three.

One Lutheran layman made the same point about Objective Justification in a recent message to me.

The Lutheran synods were healthy when they taught Justification by Faith, but that was a long time ago. Now they emulate ELCA in every possible way.

 The elephant in the LQ room - they lie down with ELCA dawgs and git up with fleas, taking it out on poor little defenseless Ichabod.


The LutherQuackers should defend Matt Harrison and his buddies Schroeder and Pope John for:

  1. Working with ELCA and burning up Thrivent dollars for their agenda.
  2. Turning their synods into tranny trains where Nadia Bolz-Weber is admired for being so cool.
  3. Staying in the same room with female bishops (50% of the ELCA bishops) who espouse abortion on demand, fund abortion through their health plan, and teach Objective Justification.
  4. Supporting fake evangelism programs, which are no more than regurgitated Calvinist gimmicks from Fuller, Willow Creek, and other Synagogues of Satan.


I appreciate the publicity from the LutherQuackers and the cub editor Christian News. But why do I upset them so much that they engage in endless, puerile name-calling fits?

A brief summary of my teaching and practice:

  • Biblical inerrancy.
  • Precise translations and the traditional text. Hence, the KJV in all books and services.
  • The Book of Concord - subscriptions are meaningless.
  • The Six-Day Creation through the Word of God.
  • The efficacy of the Word.
  • The Real Presence, weekly Holy Communion.
  • Male leadership without excluding women, who are a priceless component of our media ministries.
  • World mission in the Philippines.
  • Marriage between one man and one woman only.
  • Married 50+ years.
Missouri and WELS once taught and practiced this way, but no longer, so the LutherQuackers quake when I post and rage like Donald Duck.


The Italian Connection with Spygate

 Pope Francis, S.J.
Jesuit is virtually a curse-word in the Catholic Church. The Vatican helped spy against Trump? See the tweet. The pope honored an abortion activist, which is just scratching the surface. Nothing surprises me about him.


https://twitter.com/GregRubini/status/1226528021370359809


On Walther and Justification - From One of Many Laity


"Reading Ichabod. Just thinking about faith. I agree if one looks at history. Walther did start the downfall of the Lutheran church in America. His own synod and all the others.

Thanks for all your hard work on Justification by Faith.

There really is no difference between the synods. All practice a smoke screen. They really cannot say they believe the Bible is the Word of God because ALL the modern translations  remove or at the very least cast doubt about the source of the Word of God."




Yes, the LCMS is that bad, because its Objective Justification false doctrine is tied to their dogma of Walther's infallibility. Tis strange how a Pietist-rationalist with a B.A. is the lord over Scripture and the Reformation. 

Septuagesima Sunday, 2020



Septuagesima Sunday, 2020

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson




The Hymn #413        I Walk in Danger                                 
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #479         Zion Rise                     

Run the Race!

The Hymn # 652          I Lay My Sins on Jesus                              
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 199            Jesus Christ Is Risen Today

Prayers and Announcements
  • In treatment, Christina Jackson (radiation), Rush Limbaugh, Kermit Way (diagnosis, surgery).
  • Glen Kotten is recovering and expects to be home this week.
  • Bethany Lutheran Mission in the Philippines has its materials and is building a permanent roof, now that the harvest is finishing. Pastor and Mrs. Palangyos are from that region.
  • Pilgrim's Progress, Wednesday 7 PM Central, will begin Part II this week, Christiana's story.
Hans Brorson - "I Walk in Danger." He was a Danish Pietist known for this hymn and often associated with Thomas Kingo and Nicholai Grundtvig. He wrote the ethereal "Behold a Host Arrayed in White" and "Thy Little Ones, Dear Lord, Are We." Over 100 of his hymns are in the Danish hymnal.

1 Corinthians 9:24 Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize? So run, that ye may obtain.  25 And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible.  26 I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air:  27 But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway. 10:1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;  2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; 3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat;  4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.  5 But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.

KJV Matthew 20:1 For the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which went out early in the morning to hire labourers into his vineyard. 2 And when he had agreed with the labourers for a penny a day, he sent them into his vineyard. 3 And he went out about the third hour, and saw others standing idle in the marketplace, 4 And said unto them; Go ye also into the vineyard, and whatsoever is right I will give you. And they went their way. 5 Again he went out about the sixth and ninth hour, and did likewise. 6 And about the eleventh hour he went out, and found others standing idle, and saith unto them, Why stand ye here all the day idle? 7 They say unto him, Because no man hath hired us. He saith unto them, Go ye also into the vineyard; and whatsoever is right, that shall ye receive. 8 So when even was come, the lord of the vineyard saith unto his steward, Call the labourers, and give them their hire, beginning from the last unto the first. 9 And when they came that were hired about the eleventh hour, they received every man a penny. 10 But when the first came, they supposed that they should have received more; and they likewise received every man a penny. 11 And when they had received it, they murmured against the goodman of the house, 12 Saying, These last have wrought but one hour, and thou hast made them equal unto us, which have borne the burden and heat of the day. 13 But he answered one of them, and said, Friend, I do thee no wrong: didst not thou agree with me for a penny? 14 Take that thine is, and go thy way: I will give unto this last, even as unto thee. 15 Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? Is thine eye evil, because I am good? 16 So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.

Septuagesima Sunday

Lord God, heavenly Father, who through Thy holy word hast called us into Thy vineyard: Send, we beseech Thee, Thy Holy Spirit into our hearts, that we may labor faithfully in Thy vineyard, shun sin and all offense, obediently keep Thy word and do Thy will, and put our whole and only trust in Thy grace, which Thou hast bestowed upon us so plenteously through Thy Son Jesus Christ, that we may obtain eternal salvation through Him, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.


Background for the Epistle Lesson - 1 Corinthians 9:24 - 10:5
The ancients Greeks were so enamored of athletic contests that they stopped wars in order to have competitions. The same who fought on the battlefield were competitors in the Olympic, Delphic, and other games. Alexander the Great expanded Greek culture, creating the Hellenistic Empire, which brought drama, literature, trade, engineering, the Greek language, and athletics to every corner - three hundred years before Christ. For that reason, Greece was the standard in all human endeavors, and the growing Roman Empire emulated Greece in its expansion. 

The Roman Emperor Nero, about 40 years after Christ, wanted to win every contest and wear the laurel crown. We still use that term - laurels - for honors in athletics and academics. Julius Caesar  (40 years before Christ) obtained permission to wear his laurels all the time, because he was balding, the first celebrity to wear a "rug."

Paul's example of athletic competition used universal images of his time, and they fit ours as well. Not long ago, America stopped to watch athletes compete for the trophy awarded at the Superbowl. Professional and amateur athletes are remembered for the laurels they won in years past.




Run the Race!

1 Corinthians 9:24 Know ye not that they which run in a race [stadium length -  εν σταδιω] run all, but one receiveth the prize? So run, that ye may obtain. 25 And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible.

Instructing the Christians under his care, the Apostle used an image familiar to all. The important races had one winner, just one who received the prize.

This is a fitting analogy for believers, because we move toward the goal as individuals. We cannot make others believe, though we can teach them. We cannot give them our faith, but we can share the Gospel Word. This is a message for each and every one of us. 

Just as in running a race, the individual has to be disciplined just to compete and maintain that purpose throughout the race. The marathon race is named for the place - Marathon - where a battle was being fought and a runner sent to report the results. 

Whether the race is 100 meters or 26 miles, the training and diet for that contest has to be consistent, self-disciplined, and designed for that effort. Paul says, "Run in order to receive that prize."

Like music, athletics have been used to learn a discipline - practice, being on time, avoiding training pitfalls. One athlete bragged that he could run laps and smoke at the same time, the same with other lapses. Years later he was addicted to those substances that he could overcome with his natural ability.

Those who look at spiritual discipline the same way can easily find that the short-cuts often become second nature and a permanent pattern. Our impulsive culture promotes that as meritorious, so outrageous actions are praised for the moment. 

Spiritual discipline is easily described as remaining on the True Vine, Jesus the Savior, and being fruitful through the cleansing of repentance and forgiveness of sin. 

Athletes study what diets they should maintain before and on the day of the contest. The human body cannot deliver on a diet of fast food, and our souls cannot thrive and endure without soul food - the Word and Sacraments, the Means of Grace. 

25 And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible.

Striving is the word we use for agony today, the battle between one force and another. The body of the runner is aching, not just on race day but on every day of training. The athlete's struggle to master the body and emotions is tremendous and often consuming. One man said he could not re-enter his sport because the winning numbers were much higher and he was not geared emotionally to exceed those numbers.

The foot is an engineering marvel, a living cathedral designed for speed, strength and endurance. "The human foot is a strong and complex mechanical structure containing 26 bones, 33 joints (20 of which are actively articulated), and more than a hundred muscles, tendons, and ligaments." A single problem in one foot can be crippling for the runner. Our podiatrist pulled glass out of mine, several times, and that was to remove pain in walking.

Part-time believers are like sporadic athletes. Time off becomes a permanent vacation, and the benefits fail to accrue. That is important because the Christian Faith offers is the One Truth so many have sought over the centuries, the wise men, kings, and priests.

Those with a slight knowledge of Creation will say to me, "How can we leave 20 sacks of leaves on your garden? They will blow all over the block. You will have to rake them back." I tell them, "No, the leaves interlock and quickly become a thick, blanket, softened by rain and frost, slowly absorbed into the soil. That protects plants and provides food for them through the devouring action of slugs, earthworms, springtails, and mites. They become nutrition as they disappear as the former leaf blanket." All things were created by the Son of God, the Logos, and nothing was created apart from Him." John 1:3. Concordia, St. Louis has no clue.

The corruptible crown (στεφανον - crown, Stephan) is that prize of laurel leaves, a symbol of all that work that went before and continued during that race. As great an honor as that is, the more important prize is finishing the race as a believer.

In Understanding Pilgrim's Progress, I keep mentioning that the work emphasizes the endurance and discipline of the Christian's life, the many opportunities to go astray and lose the prize.

Christiana's Story, Part II, Is Found in the Lutheran Librarian's edition of Pilgrim's Progress. Click the link to
spread the Word.


26 I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air:  27 But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway. 

As Lenski notes, Paul uses double-negatives (litotes) to say he runs not uncertainly - but with a purpose. And he fights - not shadow boxes - but to win.

The Apostles lived in a pagan era much like ours, and we are just as bad, even in the worst ways possible. Lewd behavior was normal, and religion was often united with fertility rites, as we see being celebrated today in ELCA and almost universally hailed a freedom to be. In the midst of all temptations, Paul said he made his body subordinate to his faith, his body a temple of God, so that he would not fail as an apostle by being associated with pagan extremes.

Where Christianity fails, pagan worship takes over. Paul's inspired advice is laughed at, and the world looks upon buzzed celebrities with awe, respect, and wonder.

Lenski: Corinthians p. 386
"When we read all that Paul says about the body we should not catch the real point of his entire dis cussion if we failed to see just why he so prominently brings in this reference to his body. In many other connections he deals with the body and with its mem bers plus the lusts that use these organs for their pur pose. Thus in 6:12, etc.; Rom. 12:1. Here he refers to his body as an organism that requires food, drink, clothing, lodging, etc., in a word, support in order to live, support from the churches he served. This body of his would like to have abundant and rich support in order to live in a style that is befitting the body of an apostle, to say nothing about the greatest apostle of all. See the grand style in which prominent clerics live to day! Now Paul says: "I knock this out of my body completely; lead my body around as a slave (this is the first meaning of δουλαγωγω) ; I never let it rob me of my glory, that I make the gospel completely without charge' to all those to-whom I preach." Our versions are too refined also when they translate this degrading verb. It means complete slavery and not mere subjection or bondage, which may be much less."

It is tempting to attach profit to media productions, which is why our little group operates non-profit and often giving away books, recordings, and art. If a book can make $1,000 a year in profits for the author in the Lutheran market, why not drop the Sacraments, Luther, the Creeds, and make many times more? Many have forgotten what Luther said about temptation - "We cannot keep birds from flying over our heads, but we can keep them from building nests in our hair."

10:1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;  2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; 3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat;  4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.  5 But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.

St. Paul binds the individual's relationship to the larger view of the People of God, using "all" five times. The four verses build up to the presence of Christ in the Exodus. They were separated as the People of God and set free by God, escaping the Egyptians and slavery. The Rock is Christ, but the Greek term is rock-ledge or bedrock, not a rock. δε πετρα ην ο χριστος

At Caesarea Philippi, Jesus said, "You are Rocky πετρος," his nickname for Simon, and upon this Bedrock πετρα  (Jesus Himself) I will build My Church.

Matthew 16:18 - συ ει πετρος και επι ταυτη τη πετρα οικοδομησω μου την εκκλησιαν 

Jesus did not appoint Peter to be the first Pope, and he did not promise to build His Church on Peter's confession. After all, Peter rebuked Jesus a few seconds later. Man's confession is not permanent and stable, but Jesus is the foundation, the bedrock of the Christian Church.

Verse 5 concludes by saying that in spite of all that God did for His people to start and continue the Exodus, many fell away. This is a warning for all believers today.

In the same way, Christ died for the sins of all. However, even though many begin in the faith, through the Gospel Word, including Holy Baptism, many take this gift lightly. Others willfully teach another doctrine. Still others rejoice in their freedom but not in the Gospel itself.

The Greek word used for athletic competition is "struggle," and all of life is a struggle in the same way. Fortunately, we have world-wide team to help, encourage, support, and pray for us. I have as many (or as few) Christian friends in this Bible Belt city here as a member does in New York City. But we have a circle of Christian friends around the world. 

An old gruff member years ago was never appreciated by his church members, even though he supported that congregation far more than those members did. He spoke his mind at all times instead of playing games. He knew and felt this disapproval from the very people who expected him to bear their burdens. He would talk about those painful experiences and conclude, "Well, Jesus loves me."

His family chased him away from Bethany, but he got this congregation going anyway.


Saturday, February 8, 2020

Luther's Sermon on Running the Race. Septuagesima 1 Corinthians 9:24-27ff

Norma A. Boeckler

THIRD SUNDAY BEFORE LENT


TEXT:

1 CORINTHIANS 9:24-27; 10:1-5.  24 “Know ye not that they that run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize? Even so run; that ye may attain. 25 And every man that striveth in the games exerciseth self-control in all things. Now they do it to receive a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible. 26 I therefore so run, as not uncertainly; so fight I, as not beating the air: 27 but I buffet my body, and bring it into bondage: lest by any means, after that I have preached to others, I myself should be rejected. 1 For I would not, brethren, have you ignorant, that our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; 2 and were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; 3 and did all eat the same spiritual food; 4 and did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of a spiritual rock that followed them: and the rock was Christ. 5 Howbeit with most of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.

THE CHRISTIAN RACE FOR THE PRIZE.

1. This lesson is a part of the long four-chapter instruction Paul gives the Corinthians. Therein he teaches them how to deal with those weak in the faith, and warns rash, presumptuous Christians to take heed lest they fall, however they may stand at the present. He presents a forcible simile in the running of the race, or the strife for the prize. Many run without obtaining the object of their pursuit. But we should not vainly run. To faithfully follow Christ does not mean simply to run. That will not suffice. We must run to the purpose. To believe, to be running in Christ’s course, is not sufficient; we must lay hold on eternal life. Christ says ( Matthew 24:13), “But he that endureth to the end, the same shall he saved.” And Paul ( 1 Corinthians 10:12), “Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.”

2. Now, running is hindered in two ways; for one, by indolence. When faith is not strenuously exercised, when we are indolent in good works, our progress is hindered, so that the prize is not attained. But to such hindrance I do not think Paul here refers. He is not alluding to those who indolently run, but to them who run in vain because missing their object; individuals, for instance, who pursue their aim at full speed, but, deluded by a phantom, miss their aim and rush to ruin or run up against fearful obstacles. Hence Paul enjoins men to run successfully while in the race, that they may seize the prize and not lose it by default. In consequence the race is hindered when a false goal is set up or the true one removed. The apostle says ( Colossians 2:18), “Let no man rob you of your prize.” It is true, however, that an indolent, negligent life will eventually bring about loss of the prize. While men sleep, the enemy very soon sows tares among the wheat.

3. The goal is removed when the Word of God is falsified and creations of the human mind are preached under the name of God’s Word. And these things readily come about when we are not careful to keep the unity of the Spirit, when each follows his own ideas and yields to no other, because he prefers his own conceit.

Such must be the course of events where love is lacking. The strong and the learned desire to be looked upon as peculiarly commendable, while the weak in the faith are despised. Thus the devil has abundant opportunity to sow tares. Paul calls love the unity of the Spirit, and admonishes ( Ephesians 4:3) that we endeavor to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. In 2 Thessalonians 2:10 he proclaims the coming of Antichrist “because they received not the love of the truth”; that is, true love. “And every man that striveth in the games [that striveth for the mastery].”

4. Were he who competes in a race to attempt other things or to make a success of other matters at the same time, he would not gain much; rather he would soon be defeated, lose the race and everything. If he would truly strive, he must attend to no other thing. All else must be neglected and attention centered upon the contest alone. Even then the winner must have fortune’s favor; for they who neglect all to run do not all gain the prize.

Likewise in the Christian contest it is necessary, and in an even higher degree, to renounce everything and to devote oneself only to the contest.

He who would in addition seek his own glory and profit, who would find in the Word and Spirit of God occasion for his own praise and advantage after the manner of the dissenters and schismatics — what can such a one expect to win? He is wholly entangled in temporal glory and gain; bound hand and foot, a complete captive. The race he runs is the mere dream race of one lying upon his couch an indolent captive. “I therefore so run, as not uncertainly; so fight I, as not beating the air.”

5. Paul here points to himself as exemplar and hints at the cause of failure, viz., lapse from love and the use of the divine word in a wilful, ambitious and covetous spirit, whereas the faith which worketh by love is lacking.

Under such conditions, false and indolent Christians run indeed a merry race; yet God’s Word and ways in which they are so alert and speedy are merely a show, because they make them subserve their own interests and glory. They fail, however, to see that they race uncertainly and beat the air.

They never make a serious attempt, nor do they ever hit the mark. While it is theirs to mortify ambition, to restrain their self-will and to enlist in the service of their neighbors, they do none of these things. On the contrary, they even do many things to strengthen their ambition and self-will, and then they swear by a thousand oaths that they are seeking not their own honor but the honor of God, their neighbor’s welfare and not their own.

Peter says ( 2 Peter 1:9-10) this class are blind and cannot see afar and have forgotten they were purged from their old sins, because they fail to make their calling sure by good works. Therefore, it comes about that, as Paul says, they run uncertainly, beating the air. Their hearts are unstable and wavering before God, and they are changeable and fickle in all their ways, James 1:8. Since they are aimless and inconstant at heart, this will appear likewise as inconstancy in regard to works and doctrines. They undertake now this and now that; they cannot be quiet nor refrain from factional strife. Thus they miss their aim or else remove the goal, and cannot but deviate from the true and common path. “But I buffet [keep under] my body, and bring it into bondage [subjection].”

6. The apostle’s thought is the same as in his statement above, “Every man that striveth in the games exerciseth self-control in all things.” By “keeping under the body” Paul means, not only subduing the carnal lusts, but every temporal object as well, in so far as it appeals to bodily desire — love of honor, fame, wealth and the like. He who gives license to these things instead of subduing them will preach to his own condemnation, however correct his preaching be. Such do not permit the truth to be presented; this is true particularly of temporal honor. These words of the apostle, then, are a fine thrust at ambitious and self-centered preachers and Christians. Not only do they run in vain and fight to no purpose; they become actual castaways with only the semblance — the color — of Christianity.

EXAMPLES FROM SCRIPTURE.

“For I would not, brethren, have you ignorant, that our fathers were all under the cloud.”

7. Paul cites a terrible example from Scripture to prove that not all obtain the prize who run. There were about six hundred thousand of them, all of whom walked in the way of God and enjoyed his word and his confidence so completely as to be protected under the cloud and miraculously to pass through the sea; yet among the vast number who ran at that time only two, Joshua and Caleb, obtained the prize. They alone of all that multitude reached the promised land.

Later on in the chapter (verses 11-12) Paul explains this fact, saying: “Now these things happened unto them by way of example; and they were written for our admonition... wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.” The design of these dealings of God with Israel is to terrify the pride, false wisdom and self-will; to deter men from despising their fellows and from seeking to make the Word of God minister to their own honor or profit in preference to the honor and profit of others. The intent is to have each individual put himself on an equality with others, each to bear with his fellow, the weak enduring the strong, and so on, as enjoined in the four chapters.

8. How many great and noble men may have been among the six hundred thousand, men to whom we would have been unworthy to hand a cup of water! They included the twelve princes of the twelve tribes, one of whom, Nahshon, Matthew ( Matthew 1:4) numbers in the holy lineage of Christ. There were also the seventy elders who shared in the spirit of Moses, Eldad and Medad in particular ( Numbers 11:27), and all the other great men aside from the faction of Korah. All these, mark you, strove in the race. They did and suffered much. They witnessed many miracles of God. They aided in erecting a grand tabernacle and in instituting divine worship. They were full of good works. Yet they failed, and died in the wilderness. Who is so daring and haughty he will not be restrained and humbled by so remarkable an example of divine judgment?

Well may it be said, “Let him that... standeth take heed lest he fall.”

9. Well, the example of Israel is one readily understood. God grant we may heed it! Let us examine the apostle’s text yet further — his mention of baptism and spiritual food, using Christian terms and placing the fathers upon the same plane with us Christians, as if they also had had Baptism and the Holy Supper.

He would have us know, first, the oft-repeated fact that God from the beginning led, redeemed and saved his saints by two instrumentalities — by his own word and external signs. Adam was saved by the word of promise ( Genesis 3:15): The seed of the woman shall bruise the serpent’s head; that is, Christ shall come to conquer sin, death and Satan for us. To this promise God added the sign of sacrifice, sacrifice kindled with fire from heaven, as in Abel’s case ( Genesis 4:4), and in other cases mentioned in the Scriptures. The word of promise was Adam’s Gospel until the time of Noah and of Abraham. In this promise all the saints down to Abraham believed, and were redeemed; as we are redeemed by the word of the Gospel which we believe. The fire from heaven served them as a sign, as baptism does us, which is added to the word of God.

10. Such signs were repeated again and again at various times, the last sign being given by Christ in his own person — the Gospel with baptism, granted to all nations. For instance, God gave Noah the promise that he should survive the flood, and granted him a sign in the ship, or ark, he built. And by faith in the promise and sign Noah was justified and saved, with his family. Afterward God gave him another promise, and for a sign the rainbow. Again, he gave Abraham a promise, with the sign of circumcision. Circumcision was Abraham’s baptism, just as the ark and the flood were that of Noah. So also our baptism is to us circumcision, ark and flood, according to Peter’s explanation. 1 Peter 3:21. Everywhere we meet the Word and the Sign of God, in which we must believe in order to be saved through faith from sin and death.

11. Thus the children of Israel had God’s word that they should inherit the promised land. In addition to that word they were given many signs, in particular those Paul here names — the sea, the cloud, the bread from heaven, the water from the rock. These he calls their baptism; just as our baptism might be called our sea and cloud. Faith and the Spirit are the same everywhere, though the signs and the words vary. Signs and words indeed change from time to time, but faith in the one and same God continues. Through various signs and revelations, God at different times bestows the same faith and the same Spirit, effecting through these in all saints remission of sins, redemption from death, and salvation, whether they lived in the beginning or at the end of time, or while time progressed.

12. Such is Paul’s meaning when he says the fathers did eat the same meat, and drink the same drink as we. He, however, qualifies with the word “spiritual.” Externally and individually Israel had signs and revelations different from ours; but the Spirit and their faith in Christ was identical with our own. Spiritual eating and drinking is simply believing in God’s Word and sign. Christ says ( John 6:56), “He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood abideth in me, and I in him.” And in the preceding verse, “My flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.” That is, He that believeth in me shall live. “For they drank of a spiritual rock that followed them.”

13. In other words, they believed in the same Christ in whom we believe, though he was yet to come in the flesh; and the sign of their faith was the material rock, from which they physically drank water, just as we in partaking of the material bread and wine at the altar spiritually eat and drink the true Christ. With the outward act of eating and drinking we exercise inward faith. Had the Israelites not possessed the word of God and faith as they drank from the rock, the act of drinking would not have benefited their souls. Neither would it profit us to receive bread and wine at the altar if we were without faith. Indeed, had not the Word of God come first, the rock would not have yielded water and command faith.

Likewise, if God’s Word did not accompany bread and wine, they would not be spiritual food nor exercise faith.

14. So it is ever the same spiritual meat and drink which God embodies in his word and sign, whatever its material and external form may be. Were he to command me to lift up a mere straw, immediately the straw would hold for me spiritual food and drink. Not because of any virtue in the straw, but because it is a revelation and sign of the divine truth and presence. Again, if God’s Word and his sign be lacking or unrecognized, the very presence of God himself has no effect. Christ says of himself ( John 6:63), “The flesh profiteth nothing.” He makes that statement because his hearers pay no heed to the words in which he speaks of his flesh, though it is these which make his body the true meat, according to his declaration (verse 58), “This is the bread which came down out of heaven.” Therefore we are not to regard unduly, as blind reason does, the works, signs and miracles of God; rather we are to recognize his message therein. This is the act of faith.

15. The apostle refers to a single type — the rock, saying: “They drank of a spiritual rock that followed them: and the rock was Christ.” By this statement he makes all the figures and signs granted to the people of Israel by the Word of God refer to Christ; for where the Word of God is, there Christ is. All the words and promises of God are concerning Christ. Christ himself refers the serpent of Moses to himself, giving it a typical significance, John 3:14. We may truly say the Israelites looked upon the same serpent we behold, for they saw the spiritual serpent that followed them, or Christ on the cross. Their beholding was believing in the Word of God, with the serpent for a sign; even as their spiritual drinking was believing in the Word of God with the rock for a sign. Without the Word of God, the serpent could have profited them nothing; nor could brazen serpents innumerable, had the Israelites gazed upon them forever. Likewise the rock would have profited them nothing without the word of God; they might have crushed to powder all the rocks of the world or drank from them to no purpose.

16. According to the general principle here laid down by Paul, by using the rock as illustration, we may say the Israelites partook of the same bread of heaven whereof we eat; and they ate of the spiritual bread of heaven which followed them — Christ. With them, eating was believing in the Word of God, while they had for their sign the bread from heaven whereof they physically partook. Had not this Word accompanied the bread, it would have been simply material food, incapable of profiting the soul or calling forth faith. Christ says ( John 6:32), “It was not Moses that gave you the bread out of heaven; but my Father giveth you the true bread out of heaven.” And ( John 6:58), “Not as the fathers ate [manna], and died.”

Even Moses says ( Deuteronomy 8:3), “And fed thee with manna... that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by everything that proceedeth out of the mouth of Jehovah.”

In other words, “In the material manna you must not merely see the work — the act of satisfying the appetite — but much rather the word of promise bringing you the bread of heaven; for by that word you live forever if you have faith.”

17. We may say the same concerning the sea and the cloud. The children of Israel walked under the same cloud that shadows us; that means, they walked under the spiritual cloud that followed them — Christ. Otherwise expressed, walking under the cloud was simply believing in the word of God, the word they had in their hearts, which told them to follow the cloud. Without that word they would have been unable to believe or to follow; indeed, with the word lacking, the cloud would never have appeared. Therefore, the cloud was called the glory of the Lord whose appearance had been promised.

So we see how we must in all things have regard to the word of God. To it faith must attach itself. Without it, either there are no signs and works of God, or else, existing, and regarded with the physical eyes only, without reference to the Word, they cause one to open his mouth in wonderment for a while like everything else which is new, but they do not profit the soul nor do they appeal to faith.

18. Some take the words “which followed them” to mean that the spiritual rock accompanied the children of Israel, companioning with them — “comitante petra,” not “petra consequente,” Christ being spiritually present in the word and by faith. This view they endeavor to base upon the Greek text. I have rendered it: “the rock following.” The point is not worth contention. Let each understand it as he may. Both interpretations given are correct. I hold to what I have offered because all the circumstances of the incident, and earlier words of God, pointed to a future Christ, a Christ who should follow, in whom they should all believe. Thus Abraham saw behind him the ram in the thicket and took and sacrificed him; that is, he believed in the Christ who afterward should come and be sacrificed.

19. Again, some say the common noun in the clause “and the rock was Christ” means the material rock; and since Christ cannot be material rock they explain the inconsistency by saying the rock signifies Christ. They here make the word “was” equivalent to “signifies.” The same reasoning they apply to certain words of Christ; for instance, they say where Christ, referring to the Holy Supper ( Matthew 26:26), commands, “Take, eat; this is my body” — they say the meaning is, “This bread signifies, but is not truly, my body.” They would thereby deny that the bread is the body of Christ. In the same manner do they deal with the text ( John 15:1) “I am the true vine,” in making it “I am signified by the vine.” Beware of such reasoners. Their own malice has led them to such perverting of Scripture.

Paul here expressly distinguishes between material and spiritual rocks, saying: “They drank of a spiritual rock that followed them: and the rock was Christ.” He does not say the material rock was Christ, but the spiritual rock. The material rock was not spiritual, and did not follow or go with them.’ 20. The explanations and distortions of such false reasoners are not needed here. The words are true as they read; they are to be understood in substance and not figuratively. So in John 15:1, Christ’s reference is not to a material but a spiritual vine. How would this read, “I am signified by a spiritual vine”? Christ is speaking of that which exists, and must so be understood — “I am”; here is a true spiritual vine. Similar is John 6:55, “My flesh is meat indeed.” The thought is not, “My flesh signifies, or is signified by, true meat”; spiritual meat is spoken of and the meaning is, “My flesh is substantially a food; not for the stomach, physically, but for the soul, spiritually.” Neither must you permit the words “This is my body” to be perverted to mean that the body is but signified by the bread, as some pretend; you must accept the words precisely as they mean — “This bread is essentially, by a real presence, my body.” The forcing of Scripture to meet one’s own opinions cannot be tolerated. A clear text proving that the infinitive “to be” is equivalent to “signify” would be needed; and, even though this might be proven in a few instances, it would not suffice. It would still have to be indisputably shown true in the place in question. This can never be done. Now, the proposition being impossible, we must surrender to the Word of God and accept it as it stands.

21. Christ has been typified by various signs and objects in the Old Testament, and the rock is one of them. Note first, the material rock spoken of had place independently of man’s labor and far from man’s domain, in the wilderness, in desolate solitude. So Christ is a truly insignificant object in the world, disregarded, unnoticed; nor is he indebted to human labor.

22. Further, water flowing from the rock is contrary to nature; it is purely miraculous. The water typifies the quickening spirit of God, who proceeds from the condemned, crucified and dead Christ. Thus life is drawn from death, and this by the power of God. Christ’s death is our life, and if we would live we must die with him.

23. Moses strikes the rock at the command of God and points to it, thus prefiguring the ministerial office which by word of mouth strikes from the spiritual rock the Spirit. For God will give his Spirit to none without the instrumentality of the Word and the ministerial office instituted by him for this purpose, adding the command that nothing be preached but Christ.

Had not Moses obeyed the command of God to smite the rock with his rod, no water would ever have flowed therefrom. His rod represents rod of the mouth whereof Isaiah speaks ( Isaiah 11:4): “He shall smite the earth with the rod of his mouth; and with the breath of his lips shall he slay the wicked.” “A scepter of equity is the scepter of thy kingdom.” Psalm 45:6.

Did Walther Violate His Own Law and Gospel Thesis?

This is the last image of His Holiness, Dr. CFW Walther.


Daniel Gorman (Heinrich)
Senior Member!


Post Number: 4186
Registered: 11-2004
Posted on Saturday, February 08, 2020 - 7:06 am:    Edit Post
Did Walther violate his own law and gospel thesis?

"Thesis XIV: You are not rightly distinguishing Law and Gospel in the Word of God if you demand that faith is a condition for justification and salvation. It would be wrong to preach that people are righteous in the sight of God and are saved not only by their faith, but also on account of their faith, for the sake of their faith, or in view of their faith."

***

GJ - And all God's people said, "Wha-a-a-a-t?"

I left the quotation in neutral green rather than red-zoning it. The LutherQueasies are all experts on Walther, so they say - but know little of Luther and even less of the Scriptures. That catastrophe happens when people make one person the infallible pope and criticism of that pope a sin.

John Bunyan found a copy of Luther's Galatians and made it his "most read book after the Bible." That is why Bunyan has so many great spiritual insights and conveys them so well. His first authority is the Bible - and Luther is right after that. I would wager that most of the serious authors in days past (name any single person) knew more Luther than all the faculties of St. Louis, Ft. Whine, Mordor, and the Little Schoolhouse on the Prairie. Those earlier authors were not necessarily in agreement with Luther or each other, but they knew where to start.

The modernist Lutheran leaders - which include ELCA-LCMS-ELS-WELS-CLC (sic) - have two severe handicaps.

  1. The first is their neglect of a precise translation with a faithful text (KJV), 
  2. The second is favoring the whackadoodle paraphrases of a butchered text - NIV, ESV, New RSV, New American, Living Bible.
  3. One error reinforces the other. No PhD or synod leader will be caught quoting the KJV, so they are easily locked into one form of Calvinism or another.
Let us return to the Walther thesis and its superabundant 

"Thesis XIV: You are not rightly distinguishing Law and Gospel in the Word of God if you demand that faith is a condition for justification and salvation. It would be wrong to preach that people are righteous in the sight of God and are saved not only by their faith, but also on account of their faith, for the sake of their faith, or in view of their faith."

The first error is Walther's dogmatic thesis. His Biblical skills were most absent, and the best parts of Law and Gospel were his Luther quotes. I would not recommend any of Walther's works, except in looking at the dark, confused history of the LCMS.

Notice that Valleskey who never went to Fuller Seminary, used theses to prove that Church Growth was a case of "spoiling the Egyptians." He and his buddies were not pleased this was described as picking figs from thistles. Father Steve Spencer asked me to write that review because everyone else was afraid to do it. The Little Sect leaders went bonkers over that little review in CN.

So let us test if Walther's edict is true.

"You are not rightly distinguishing Law and Gospel in the Word of God if you demand that faith is a condition for justification and salvation."

Through the Holy Spirit, St. Paul used the example of Abraham in Genesis 15:6 to show that faith is indeed the condition for justification and salvation. Abraham did not simply believe he could be a daddy. He believed in the Messianic Promises, in Christ Jesus, as the future through the power of God. And Abraham believed in a kingdom (of God) vaster than the stars in the sky.

Romans 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.

According to Phil Hale, the cub editor of Christian News, this is Satanic! "It is satanic that people like Gregory Jackson and Paul Rydecki have used misleading and complicating rational arguments, incorrect biblical interpretation, and misleading historical evidence to make this such a difficult issue to grasp today." Hale even lied about the Kokomo Statements, which were drawn up by a WELS pastor, taken mostly from a WELS Mordor professor, and defended by WELS, yea even by Sig Becker. Hale does as much research as Chris Matthews and Don Lemon combined.

For those who pit faith against grace, a horrible blasphemy, St. Paul wrote - 

Romans 4:16 Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all,

"If you demand..." - that is a strange, divisive, and erroneous way to speak of faith, since the efficacious Gospel Word plants faith in our hearts through the Holy Spirit. This gift of faith comes from the Spirit at work in the speaker and the Spirit at work in the individual. Gifts are not demanded, but Walther seemed compelled to make faith as odious as possible, in such words as "the shriveled hand grasping the Gospel." 


"It would be wrong to preach that people are righteous in the sight of God and are saved not only by their faith, but also on account of their faith, for the sake of their faith, or in view of their faith."

Walther wrote Law and Gospel, at the end of his life, when he was trying to use Election without Faith to support his Justification without Faith (Stephan-Walther-Pieper-Kokomo). He split the Synodical Conference over his insistence. However, the Missouri Synod continued to teach Justification by Faith for many years.
The Norwegian Pietistic Preus clan went to war with Objective Justification and used it to muscle WAM II out of a leadership position. That is how false teachers work, they ferociously battle to keep the Chief Article from being taught. Maier, who recently died, was not allowed to teach Romans after the Preus-Scaer gang finished.

"...not only by their faith, but also on account of their faith, for the sake of their faith, or in view of their faith."

The Appleton WELS gang condemned me for "Inuitu Fidei," which I gathered was the faith of the Inuits, or Eskimo.

The last phrase is the most common one used in attacking the Chief Article, Justification by Faith - intuitu fidei, in view of faith, or in Appleton, inuitu fidei (the Faith of the Inuits). I do not favor Latin, dogmatic terms, because people get locked into who said what when, largely without even reading the sources. OJists are a lazy bunch, except for their extreme energy in deceiving - they are hopped up for that.

Walther displayed an extreme animosity to faith in this thesis, and his errors cannot be excused or erased. He set in motion the gradual shift of Missouri toward mainline, Left-wing, apostasy. 

Believe it or not, I spent three years studying the past and modern theological works of Roman Catholics, Calvinists, Mennonites, and Lutherans. Four years went into the dissertation on the Social Gospel Movement in the Lutheran Church. Those were the seven PhD classwork, written exam, and dissertation years at Notre Dame. The advantage was not being tied to Holy Mother Synod, so I gained quite a perspective, an unusual opportunity to read endlessly and discuss issues with liberal professors and graduate students. (Example, Roman Catholic friends in the program were disgusted that I believed the Virgin Birth and physical Resurrection of Christ. I even wrote to the LCA seminaries to see if any professor believed in those doctrines. However, one nun in the program said, "How can Luther, who lived 500 years ago, speak directly to me?" My answer was - "Because he wrote directly from the Scriptures.")

When I write that Objective Justification is exactly what the liberal Protestants and Catholics teach today, that is from reading hundreds of books and plenty of scholarly articles over those years.



The quoted Walther thesis is found in this form in modern theology -

"If we include faith as a contingency, if we believe, then grace is no longer grace."

That is contrary to St. Paul -

Romans 4:16 Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all,

The Pieper-Watherians are dead set against the Gospel, so they promote their hallucinations over the clear, plain Word of God.

No, they are Left-wing ecumenicals, who love every creed but their own.