Saturday, March 13, 2021

The Opening Pages of The Bible Book Revised and Expanded.
Illustrations on the Blog Are Temporary



Part One

 

            The Bible has been improved in so many ways in the last 70 years that many of them can hardly find their way back to the source. One revision was not enough, so the new versions have multiplied faster than diet and Church Growth books. I remember getting a four version New Testament in the 1960s, in parallel columns, which provided as much clarity as a family argument. 

            The Bible is the revealed Word of God, and like Jesus Christ, has two natures, divine and human, but without error. The Bible is one Truth, the Book of the Holy Spirit, with all parts in harmony. The spirit of rationalism, under the banner of improvement, is bound to move from one imagined contradiction to another. However, faith in Jesus, the Son of God, leads us from one priceless passage to another. 

            The Bible is inerrant and infallible. The established denominations claim that inerrant is a new description for the Bible. But Luther used the Latin words for inerrant and infallible in his Large Catechism, On Baptism. Infallible has been the prevailing definition but the term was watered down so much that the word suggested fallible. The tepid, tentative, liberal theologians began saying, “Infallible in doctrine, but not in history or geography.” That was like saying, “Your essay is perfect, except in spelling and grammar.” Likewise, the inspiration of the Scriptures was watered down by many similar qualifications and amendments, so plenary was added to the inspiration of the Word of God.

            Denominational mergers of the 20th century hid their internal conflicts, so they removed the friction with this solemn and rather angry declaration – “The Bible did not float down from heaven. It was written by men.” Some added, to ease the pain of serious study, “We could have 30 books in the Bible or 100. Humans decided the number.” I have never discovered a believer who thought the Bible came down, in finished form, from heaven. Nor did I find an expert naming another 34 books for the canon. The Apocrypha, heavily promoted by the Church of Rome and liberal Lutherans, never qualified for the canon. The marketing of the Apocrypha did little more little more than make people wonder what those books were.

            The greatest detour in understanding the Bible began with Medieval philosophy and theology – they were really the same at that time. Augustine began by spoiling the Egyptians, combining his universal grasp of secular knowledge with the Scriptures. Toward the end of the Middle Ages, Aquinas embalmed this method, which was embraced by Rome. Reading Augustine and Aquinas in Latin means moving from the peak of erudition to denominational script.

Unfortunately for the dream-weaving theologians, Luther was urged to earn a doctorate in the Scriptures, which brought him into constant and daily contact with the Bible. The Erasmus edition of the Greek New Testament gave the Reformer the original text of the New Testament versus the accepted and misleading Latin version. There is a reason the Holy Spirit chose to speak to us in Greek. This language was made universal by Alexander the Great’s conquests, his promotion of Greek culture, and the Greek merchants and managers set up by Alexander to do business with the world. Centuries before the Nativity, Greek was established as the natural route for the Gospel to move about in the East and West Roman Empires, centered in Rome and Constantinople. The mighty Roman Empire, which grew after Alexander’s, saw Greek as the language of culture, and proved its admiration for everything Greek by borrowing its architecture, law, literature, sculpture, government, and pagan theology.

Besides Greek, Luther also learned Hebrew and used his verbal skills, with a team of scholars, to translate the Old Testament into German. The Old Testament completed the Bible he started by translating the New Testament from Greek into German at the Wartburg Castle. Luther’s Bible established the German language, just as Shakespeare and the King James Version established the English language.

We now have endless methods and resources for learning the Biblical languages of Hebrew and Greek, which caused so much interest during the Reformation and after. But few seminary students currently learn more than the ancient alphabets, bypassing Latin as well, due to its expulsion from public education. The put down of Shakespeare, the actor, having “little Latin and less Greek,” is now true of the ministry, having little Greek, less Hebrew, and no Latin at all.

The Cornerstone Is the Beginning

            The great Dr. Walter Maier, who earned a PhD in Semitics at Harvard University, identified Biblical inerrancy and Justification by Faith as the cornerstone and the keystone of the Scriptures. The beginning of the universe - and the Bible - is an excellent litmus test to see whether an individual is using ministerial reason or magisterial reason in interpreting the Bible. Ministerial reason means subordinating our understanding to the clear, plain language of the Bible. An example is Luther stating that the Bible judges all books and is not judged by any book. Magisterial reason places human reason equal or above the teaching of the Bible. This magisterial reason is on constant display in the modern commentaries, most denominations, and the Church of Rome.

            Genesis 1 teaches us inerrancy, the cornerstone of the Bible, not simply inerrancy but the power, majesty, clarity, and efficacy of the Word of God. Without this knowledge, taught by the Holy Spirit in the Word, we can make little progress in Scriptural knowledge. We may know about the Bible, as with many other subjects, whether nuclear fission or calculus, but we do not know the Bible - and become confused, indifferent, or hostile to its message.

Genesis 1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

God’s creation of the universe is taught or mocked many different ways, but this is the only true account. These two verses take chance and evolution out of the picture, and place God’s will, wisdom, intent, and purpose at the center of our lives. In the first two verses we find God the Father creating and God the Holy Spirit witnessing. The third member of the Trinity is revealed in the next verses.

Genesis 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. 4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. 5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

The skeptic wonders, “Where is the Son of God in Creation?” – which is answered in John, the Fourth Gospel and God’s own commentary on the Five Books of Moses.[1]

John 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

The Son of God existed in the beginning. He is the Logos, and through this Logos, God’s Word, all creatures and elements, stars and planets, were fashioned. To make this very certain, the double negative is used – not one single thing was made apart from Him.  Moreover, He is the life and the light of men.

            The opening of the Fourth Gospel begins with the three-fold use of the Word, which indicates the Trinity, as taught throughout John and throughout the entire Bible. The link to Genesis is difficult to miss, since only Genesis and John start with the same phrase – in the beginning. Another lesson hidden in plain view – is light being created before the sun and planets. The true Light of man is the Son of God, not the sun, planets, and moon, so often worshiped by pagans.

            These comparisons are not slight or accidental, but essential to the entire Bible and our understanding of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, Savior. They show how much of the Old Testament is essential to the New Testament, so knowledge of one without the other is slighted.

            The link between Genesis and John is attacked from two positions. One is to dismiss the Creation in Genesis because every religion has some kind of Creation story, from the absurd to the disgusting. The other is to remove the apostolic authority of John by saying it is a philosophical work written centuries after Christ. Thus, with so much time spent outside of Christian sources, they find no DNA match between John and Genesis, but an astounding array of invented matches between paganism and the Biblical books. “The Bible is dependent upon pagan religion” will land a clever lad or lass in the best world religion faculties, at elite divinity schools, and at tenure-protected denominational seminaries.

One Truth, One Harmonious Doctrine

            The fatal trigger for many is the promiscuous use of brief portions of Scripture to prove a point, apart from obvious dissonance with the Bible as a whole. The trigger word is spelled skandalon in Greek, and it means the part which sets off the trap and captures the prey. The Word of God is not so confused that it reveals one truth here and a conflicting truth somewhere else. The only way to read the Bible is seeing it as the Book of the Holy Spirit, Luther’s term, and not as a series of possible debating points.

            Teaching the Bible as a unified Truth is a powerful weapon against false doctrine, because the contradictions are so easily identified. Laity and ministers should arm themselves in advance, but that is often not sufficient. Fortunately, attacks against the truth force us into returning to the sources, the Scriptures and faithful books, to support the strength of the Gospel and the weakness of error.

One Teacher – The Holy Spirit

            The final sermons of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel are beautiful lessons on the work of the Holy Spirit. If people studied them, they would not be gaping with wonder at the marketing lectures of Fuller Seminary graduates. If the Bible were simply a work of man, it would then be just as full of contradictions as any novel. Even the classic work of Homer has errors that made the ancients say about the Iliad – “Even good Homer snores.” But the power of the Holy Spirit throughout the Bible reveals a miraculous unity on one hand and an ability to teach us on the other. The youngest child, even a baby, can comprehend the Bible’s message. However, one must believe as a child, or the Kingdom of God remains a mystery and even an enemy for those too refined to subordinate themselves to the truth.

The Efficacy of the Word

            The snake oil salesmen of the world want to sell us, at a high price, various notions and potions that are effective. They avoid and berate the one thing effective, the Word of God. The Spirit was so far ahead of us that the idea of the effectiveness of the Word was written into the Scriptures, wisely foreshadowing those days when people desired and pursued everything but the Bible – as effective.

            Outside on March 13th, 2021, the rains are pouring down on our garden, trees, and weeds. North of us, the city of Denver is promised one of the biggest snowstorms of history. No one would dare claim that the soil and plants will be the same after rain falls and the snow melts. The rain will feed the fungi, bacteria, and earthworms that tend  and feed the flowers and crops. The snow will protect the plants against the freezing, dry winds of destruction. Underneath this blanket, creatures will be relatively warm and comfortable, the ice crystals locked together to form a blanket ideal for recycling, warmth for now, moisture for later. In the snow and rain is something no city or well can offer – usable nitrogen, the building-block of life, the green of the Green Old Deal.

            The best definition of effective is something that always works, unlike anything made by man. The bridge over the Mississippi River in Moline was once an object of awe, but now it is being demolished because it no longer works. Effective would also means – never fails us, unlike our cars that fail to start on the coldest days or smolder and burn without warning. No one has ever created an effective plan that does exactly what the leaders projected and hoped. If a general in the army said, “This plan will work exactly as we have hoped, with no change or disasters or mishaps,” the soldiers would laugh and the officer would be replaced.

            God’s definition of effective is clearly revealed in Isaiah 55 – and sadly, this all-encompassing passage is almost universally ignored.

Isaiah 55: 8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord. 9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

This reminds us that no one can discern the thoughts and plans of God. Besides that, His manner of working is far superior to anything we can grasp, so we have to start with humility and subordination to Him.

Isaiah 55: 10 For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater: 11 So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.

Verses 10 and 11 point out what we should know, without questions, about the rain and snow, their cycle of coming down from heaven (a familiar motif in John) and returning. Nor can we dispute that rain and snow have a peculiar trait far more productive than anything man can produce – the power to make things grow. Farmers say, “Irrigation keeps the crops alive. Only rain can make them grow.” God’s Word is just like the rain and snow- it never returns without results. This double negative makes it impossible to find an exception to the effectiveness of God’s Word. One retiring minister said he was a failure, so I questioned him:

·        Did you preach and teach the Word faithfully? “Yes, I tried.”

·        Did you baptize and give Holy Communion? “Yes.”

·        Did you visit people with the Word and Sacrament? “Yes.”

·        Are you saying God’s Word was not effective?           

The second Promise is that God will accomplish what He pleases. The truth is – money, members, and buildings do not prove a thing, and we cannot judge now or in the future where God’s Word will flourish.  We can predict that replacing God’s Word with raffles, prizes for attendance, entertainment, soft drinks and snacks, and warmed-over bar music will accomplish nothing in God’s plan. The third Promise is that God will prosper His Word, which means the results will be so great – such as the Reformation – that no one can dispute the results are from Him.

            In short, the effectiveness of God’s Word is guaranteed in Isaiah 55 three ways:

1.      God’s Word always works and is never a failure.

2.      God’s Word always does exactly what He wills.

3.      God’s Word will accomplish His plans in abundance.

Reading this passage gives us confidence (confidence, literally “with faith”). Teaching this passage turns people away from the false gods of the market place to the Holy Trinity revealed in the Scriptures.

The Spirit Never Exhausts Our Knowledge

            The Vatican got most of the Protestant denominations to switch to their patented three-year lectionary, which gave ministers more variety to ignore. The value of the historic lectionary comes from the repetition of the basic lessons in the Epistles and Gospels. If a minister studies the same passages every year, using Luther and Lenski and many more faithful authors, he will grow in appreciation and knowledge.[2] The Spirit’s work is such that the deeper we go into the Bible, the more we appreciate and understand. Some passages, so mysterious to the pastor – especially those – hit us like thunderclaps with their truth and clarity.



[1] The Gospel of John is probably the least-read commentary about the Five Books of Moses. A careful study of John will put to shame a century of rationalistic Biblical works.

[2] The Lutheran Library has a wealth of faithful sermon books and sources to use, all as free PDFs. The Lutheran Library has many of those books available as low cost print books.



Friday, March 12, 2021

Wednesday, March 10, 2021

MidWeek Lenten Service, 2021 - Chapter 4 of Understanding Luther's Galatians



Mid-Week Lenten Vespers, 2021

 

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

 

https://video.ibm.com/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

 

Bethany Lutheran Worship, 7 PM Central StandardTime

 

TLH - Online

 

 

The Hymn #159                    Go to Dark Gethsemane        
The Order of Vespers                                             p. 41

The Psalmody   Psalm 23                                       p. 128
The Lections                            The Passion History

                                                

                                          
The Sermon Hymn #149           Come to Calvary's Holy Mountain

 

The Sermon –   Galatians 4

 
The Prayers

The Lord’s Prayer

The Collect for Grace                                            p. 45

The Hymns #552              Abide with Me

 


 

Prayers and Announcements

·        Lori (mother) and Mary Howell (daughter) for continued recovery.

·        Christina Jackson – PET results.

·        Congregation interested in Maundy Thursday Holy Communion in addition to Good Friday? Send an email pro or con.

·        DEP Trump, ongoing investigations, and military tribunals.

·        Greater knowledge of Luther’s works and faithful translations; i.e., the KJV is the English (Tyndale) version of Luther’s German Bible. They established their modern languages in England and Germany by virtue of the power of their work. Nobody ever admits this about the KJV, that it comes from Luther via Tyndale who died for translating the Scriptures from Hebrew and Greek into English.

 

Luther’s Galatians 4

 

1.         Now I say That the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be Lord of all;

2.         But is under tutors and governors until the time appointed of the father.

The Apostle had apparently finished his discourse on justification when this illustration of the youthful heir occurred to him. He throws it in for good measure. He knows that plain people are sooner impressed by an apt illustration than by learned discussion.

“I want to give you another illustration from everyday life,” he writes to the Galatians. “As long as an heir is underage he is treated very much like a servant. He is not permitted to order his own affairs. He is kept under constant surveillance. Such discipline is good for him, otherwise he would waste his inheritance in no time. This discipline, however, is not to last forever. It is to last only until ‘the time appointed of the father.’”

3.         Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world.

As children of the Law we were treated like servants and prisoners. We were oppressed and condemned by the Law. But the tyranny of the Law is not to last forever. It is to last only until “the time appointed of the father,” until Christ came and redeemed us.

3.         Under the elements of the world.

By the elements of the world the Apostle does not understand the physical elements, as some have thought. In calling the Law “the elements of the world” Paul means to say that the Law is something material, mundane, earthly. It may restrain evil, but it does not deliver from sin. The Law does not justify; it does not bring a person to heaven. I do not obtain eternal life because I do not kill, commit adultery, steal, etc. Such mere outward decency does not constitute Christianity. The heathen observes the same restraints to avoid punishment or to secure the advantages of a good reputation. In the last analysis such restraint is simple hypocrisy. When the Law exercises its higher function, it accuses and condemns the conscience. All these effects of the Law cannot be called divine or heavenly. These effects are elements of the world.

In calling the Law the elements of the world Paul refers to the whole Law, principally to the ceremonial law which dealt with external matters, as meat, drink, dress, places, times, feasts, cleansings, sacrifices, etc. These are mundane matters which cannot save the sinner. Ceremonial laws are like the statutes of governments dealing with purely civil matters, as commerce, inheritance, etc. As for the pope’s church laws forbidding marriage and meats, Paul calls them elsewhere the doctrines of devils. You would not call such laws elements of heaven.

The Law of Moses deals with mundane matters. It holds the mirror to the evil which is in the world. By revealing the evil that is in us it creates a longing in the heart for the better things of God. The Law forces us into the arms of Christ, “who is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone that believeth.” (Romans 1:4.) Christ relieves the conscience of the Law. In so far as the Law impels us to Christ it renders excellent service.

I do not mean to give the impression that the Law should be despised. Neither does Paul intend to leave that impression. The Law ought to be honored. But when it is a matter of justification before God, Paul had to speak disparagingly of the Law, because the Law has nothing to do with justification. If it thrusts its nose into the business of justification, we must talk harshly to the Law to keep it in its place. The conscience ought not to be on speaking terms with the Law. The conscience ought to know only Christ. To say this is easy, but in times of trial, when the conscience writhes in the presence of God, it is not so easy to do. As such times we are to believe in Christ as if there were no Law or sin anywhere, but only Christ. We ought to say to the Law: “Mister Law, I do not get you. You stutter so much. I don’t think that you have anything to say to me.”

When it is not a question of salvation or justification with us, we are to think highly of the Law and call it “holy, just, and good.” (Romans 7:12) The Law is of no comfort to a stricken conscience. Therefore it should not be allowed to rule in our conscience, particularly in view of the fact that Christ paid so great a price to deliver the conscience from the tyranny of the Law. Let us understand that the Law and Christ are impossible bedfellows. The Law must leave the bed of the conscience, which is so narrow that it cannot hold two, as Isaiah says, chapter 28, verse 20.

Only Paul among the apostles calls the Law “the elements of the world, weak and beggarly elements, the strength of sin, the letter that killeth,” etc. The other apostles do not speak so slightingly of the Law. Those who want to be first-class scholars in the school of Christ want to pick up the language of Paul. Christ called him a chosen vessel and equipped with a facility of expression far above that of the other apostles, that he as the chosen vessel should establish the doctrine of justification in clear-cut words.

4, 5. But when the fullness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law.

“The fullness of the time” means when the time of the Law was fulfilled, and Christ was revealed. Note how Paul explains Christ. “Christ,” says he, “is the Son of God and the son of a woman. He submitted Himself under the Law to redeem us who were under the Law.” In these words the Apostle explains the person and office of Christ. His person is divine and human. “God sent forth His Son, made of a woman.” Christ therefore is true God and true man. Christ’s office the Apostle describes in the words: “Made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law.”

Paul calls the Virgin Mary a woman. This has been frequently deplored even by some of the ancient fathers who felt that Paul should have written “virgin” instead of woman. But Paul is now treating of faith and Christian righteousness, of the person and office of Christ, not of the virginity of Mary. The inestimable mercy of God is sufficiently set forth by the fact that His Son was born of a woman. The more general term “woman” indicates that Christ was born a true man. Paul does not say that Christ was born of man and woman, but only of woman. That he has a virgin in mind is obvious.

This passage furthermore declares that Christ’s purpose in coming was the abolition of the Law, not with the intention of laying down new laws, but “to redeem them that were under the law.” Christ himself declared: “I judge no man.” (John 8:15.) Again, “I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.” (John 12:47.) In other words: “I came not to bring more laws, or to judge men according to the existing Law. I have a higher and better office. I came to judge and to condemn the Law, so that it may no more judge and condemn the world.”

How did Christ manage to redeem us? “He was made under the law.” When Christ came, He found us all in prison. What did He do about it? Although He was the Lord of the Law, He voluntarily placed Himself under the Law and permitted it to exercise dominion over Him, indeed, to accuse and to condemn Him. When the Law takes us into judgment it has a perfect right to do so. “For we are by nature the children of wrath, even as others.” (Eph. 2:3.) Christ, however, “did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth.” (I Pet. 2:22.) Hence the Law had no jurisdiction over Him. Yet the Law treated this innocent, just, and blessed Lamb of God as cruelly as it treated us. It accused Him of blasphemy and treason. It made Him guilty of the sins of the whole world. It overwhelmed him with such anguish of soul that His sweat was as blood. The Law condemned Him to the shameful death on the Cross.

It is truly amazing that the Law had the effrontery to turn upon its divine Author, and that without a show of right. For its insolence, the Law in turn was arraigned before the judgment seat of God and condemned. Christ might have overcome the Law by an exercise of His omnipotent authority over the Law. Instead, He humbled Himself under the Law for and together with them that were under the Law. He gave the Law license to accuse and condemn Him. His present mastery over the Law was obtained by virtue of His Sonship and His substitutionary victory.

Thus, Christ banished the Law from the conscience. It dare no longer banish us from God. For that matter, —the Law continues to reveal sin. It still raises its voice in condemnation. But the conscience finds quick relief in the words of the Apostle: “Christ has redeemed us from the law.” The conscience can now hold its head high and say to the Law: “You are not so holy yourself. You crucified the Son of God. That was an awful thing for you to do. You have lost your influence forever.”

The words, “Christ was made under the law,” are worth all the attention we can bestow on them. They declare that the Son of God did not only fulfill one or two easy requirements of the Law, but that He endured all the tortures of the Law. The Law brought all its fright to bear upon Christ until He experienced anguish and terror such as nobody else ever experienced. His bloody sweat. His need of angelic comfort, His tremulous prayer in the garden, His lamentation on the Cross, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” bear eloquent witness to the sting of the Law. He suffered “to redeem them that were under the law.”

The Roman conception of Christ as a mere lawgiver more stringent than Moses, is quite contrary to Paul’s teaching. Christ, according to Paul, was not an agent of the Law but a patient of the Law. He was not a law-giver, but a law-taker.

True enough, Christ also taught and expounded the Law. But it was incidental. It was a sideline with Him. He did not come into the world for the purpose of teaching the Law, as little as it was the purpose of His coming to perform miracles. Teaching the Law and performing miracles did not constitute His unique mission to the world. The prophets also taught the Law and performed miracles. In fact, according to the promise of Christ, the apostles performed greater miracles than Christ Himself. (John 14:12.) The true purpose of Christ’s coming was the abolition of the Law, of sin, and of death.

If we think of Christ as Paul here depicts Him, we shall never go wrong. We shall never be in danger of misconstruing the meaning of the Law. We shall understand that the Law does not justify. We shall understand why a Christian observes laws: For the peace of the world, out of gratitude to God, and for a good example that others may be attracted to the Gospel.

5.         That we might receive the adoption of sons.

Paul still has for his text Genesis 22:18, “In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed.” In the course of his Epistle he calls this promise of the blessing righteousness, life, deliverance from the Law, the testament, etc. Now he also calls the promise of blessing “the adoption of sons,” the inheritance of everlasting life.

 


Understanding Luther's Galatians, Illustrated by Norma A. Boeckler

For Those WELS-ELS-LCMS Pastors and Executives Who Imagined Fuller Was Conservative

LCMS and WELS Church Shrinkers bragged that more of their seminary classmates went to Fuller Seminary for "graduate work" than attended their own seminaries. Maybe that was because the Fuller classes were even easier, though they cost more. 


After signing a letter expressing disappointment with the new administration, a pro-life evangelical scholar who voted for President Joe Biden said that while he would vote for Biden again if the 2020 presidential election were held today, he would not make his support public.

 
In 2020, Mouw retired from Fuller and returned to Calvin University, becoming a senior research fellow at the Paul B. Henry Institute for the Study of Christianity and Politics.[3]

In 2007, Mouw, who sees Abraham Kuyper as a personal hero,[4] was awarded the Abraham Kuyper Prize for Excellence in Reformed Theology and Public Life at Princeton Theological Seminary by the Abraham Kuyper Center for Public Theology.[5] (Wikipedia)


Richard Mouw, president emeritus of Fuller Seminary in California
and a member of Pro-Life Evangelicals for Biden, spoke to The Christian Post Tuesday, days after his group issued a statement in response to the president's support for a coronavirus relief package that did not include a longstanding provision that prevents the use of taxpayer dollars to fund abortions.

"We are very disappointed about the COVID-19 relief package's exclusion of the Hyde Amendment, a longstanding, bipartisan policy," they wrote. "We're even more upset that the Biden administration is supporting this bill."

As a result of Biden's support for the bill, the group contended that they feel "used and betrayed."

Mouw told CP that he and other members of Pro-Life Evangelicals for Biden group knew that Biden had been "shifting" his position on the Hyde Amendment when they released a statement in support of Biden's candidacy last October, one month before the 2020 presidential election.

He maintained that conversations they had with campaign officials who now help the administration with faith outreach were reassuring.

"We made ... clear that we would offer support with the understanding that they would urge the White House to have serious conversations with Catholics and evangelicals who are right-to-life people," he recalled. "The problem is that we haven't had those conversations, and leaving the Hyde Amendment out of this particular package, this latest COVID package, is a signal that ... there really ... is no room for that kind of conversation."

Mouw confirmed that an official from the Biden administration reached out to him on Monday.

"We're going to have a meeting later this week," he said.

Mouw and Ronald Sider, another member of Pro-Life Evangelicals for Biden, will sit down with two members of the White House faith outreach office to address their concerns.

When asked if he would vote for Biden again and issue a statement in support of his candidacy if the 2020 presidential election was still forthcoming and he knew that Biden would support a coronavirus relief bill that excluded Hyde Amendment protections, Mouw responded that he would "vote the same way" while adding, "I would not give my public support."

Mouw indicated that while he disagrees with Biden's position on abortion, there are other areas where he has found common ground with the new administration, specifically on the issues of global warming and immigration.

Acknowledging that he received "a lot of angry messages from right-to-life people," some of whom called him "naive" due to his support for Biden and subsequent feelings of betrayal, Mouw still defended the object of his previous remarks in support of Biden. He said they would be necessary to provide reassurance to the "many younger evangelicals who are not happy about ... the way in which their parents and grandparents have endorsed and defended the Trump administration."

"We ... don't want to lose them to evangelicalism because of what is perceived as a mean-spirited, highly partisan commitment on the part of the older generation of evangelicals who voted 81% ... in the presidential election before this last one for Mr. Trump," he said.

"We thought it was important to hold up the right to life position and at the same time, say it's OK to be concerned about a broader range of issues such as global warming and children at the border separated from their parents and those kinds of questions. And so, we wanted to use our own access through the Biden campaign people to at least get them to stay in conversation with people like us."

In addition to explaining that he was "less optimistic" about the possibility of Biden and the Democratic Party building a "bigger tent" to accommodate pro-lifers, Mouw expressed concern about the president's support for another major legislative initiative: The Equality Act.

According to Mouw, the legislation puts "the rights of Christian institutions to preserve commitments to traditional biblical teaching regarding sexuality without being penalized in terms of federal grants, federal loans for students" in jeopardy.

"A lot of Christian colleges and universities are well over 50% dependent in their tuition income on students getting federal loans," the Fuller Seminary president emeritus added.

Mouw warned that making "the sexuality issue" an eligibility requirement for "receiving students with federal loans" would deal a "huge blow" to faith-based schools.

Leading up to the 2020 presidential election, Biden had vowed to push for the Equality Act's passage within his first 100 days in office. Biden indicated that he would work to codify Roe v. Wade, the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide, into law.

Biden's documented public support for policies widely opposed by evangelicals has led some conservatives, like former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis, to conclude that "'Evangelicals' for Biden are getting exactly what they voted for."

44 Years of Church Growth! - Don't tell Wayne Mueller.








Monday, March 8, 2021

Who Will Be the Stone Foltz - Dead from Hazing - of WELS?

1. The University Says the Incident Is an Alleged ‘Hazing Activity Involving Alcohol Consumption’

“We have to drink a handle of any alcohol that our big gives us. We have to finish the whole thing in the time we’re there before we leave,” the student told the television station.

---


He said his roommate came back from the same party under investigation.

“A handle of alcohol is… equal to about 40, 1.5-ounce shots,” the television station reported, quoting the student as saying, “I’ve never seen my roommate more drunk in his entire life. He immediately went to the bathroom and was throwing up in the toilet for just 15 minutes to an hour and making himself vomit.”

["A handle of vodka (or a handle of alcohol generally, for that matter) holds 59.2 fluid ounces, or 1.75 liters, of liquid courage. But what does that mean for you and your party?

Let’s do the math: One shot of vodka is 1 ½ ounces, and most cocktails contain at least one shot. So inside that handle, you’ve got about 20 two-shot drinks, or 40 one-shot drinks. If you’re throwing a super small party, one handle of liquor will suffice. Otherwise, you may need to step up your game."]


5. Foltz Was Attending a Big Brother Event at the Frat

WELS-ELCA Joint Effort in Digital Communications, Continuing the Mischke Tradition of ELCA Bedfellows. Does Anyone Smell Jeske's Expensive Cologne?

Here is the original copy - ELCA-WELS-LCMS and Seibert.

Brothers in Christ, A while back, the Siebert Lutheran Foundation contacted representatives from WELS, LCMS, and ELCA about the possibility of making a grant available to Lutheran churches in Southeastern Wisconsin to help them make better use of technology—particularly video streaming for worship and Bible study—to share the gospel. I was the representative from WELS who was part of this discussion. Those other representatives and I discussed the challenges our church bodies have faced during the pandemic. 

Interested parties need to attend one online “Foundational Event.” There are three options.

• Thursday, March 18 from 6:30-8:00 p.m.

• Saturday, March 20 from 10:00-11:3 a.m.

• Monday, April 12 from 6:30-8:00 p.m.

It looks like Unstuck did not work for WELS - and it looked so promising!

The beginning and end portion of these “Foundational Events” will be denomination specific, i.e. you would be with other WELS pastors in the webinar. The middle portion of this presentation will be a discussion led by Rev. Joe Liles, an ELCA pastor The Neighborhood Church in Bentonville, Arkansas, who serves a mission congregation that has always used technology extensively. He has some helpful, practical insights into the topic

There were many similarities: • universal absolution without faith in Christ - Objective Justification     churches figuring out the technical issues, such as livestreaming • the opportunities virtual content presented (reconnecting with straying members, outreach, etc.) • the challenges of managing copyrights • trying to encourage members who enjoy the convenience of worshiping at home to not make that permanent, but to return to in-person worship. We came up with a plan, lavishly supported by Siebert, allowing us to help congregations within our respective church bodies, because we are all one when it comes to putting our trotters in the trough.

J. Hein, WELS


Mark and Avoid Jeske has been a leader in working with ELCA pastors. Harrison and Schroeder are no different. They pretend otherwise.

The Turning Point - The Sine Qua Non of Biblical Studies.
From The Bible Book


The new plan is starting with the Bible:
Old Testament - Law, Prophets, and the Writings
New Testament.

Next will be the path from the Medieval Bible to Luther's, The Tyndale from Luther, and the KJV from the Tyndale-Luther.

I am planning an edifying essay about the Bible and the KJV in particular before starting the second part. That second part has been roughed out and posted here as the fraudulent text claims from Tischendorf, Wescott and Hort, which set the stage for the Historical-Critical Method. The evil fruit from the corrupt tree of unbelief includes:
  1. The RSV
  2. The NIV
  3. Good News or TEV
  4. The ESV
  5. The copy and paste EHV
  6. The Living and New Living Bibles
  7. Amplified Bibles
  8. Concordia Publishing House - Seminex Disinterred
The second part is infuriating and depressing, so people can skip that or use it to realize how special the KJV is, text and translation.

The Turning Point

If people do not understand and believe this turning point, they do not comprehend the message of the Bible.

The Bible is not only inspired and inerrant, which most traditional Christians would allow, but it is also never without the power of the Holy Spirit. That means every verse of the Bible is efficacious or effective in accomplishing the will of God.

There are many proofs of this, but the clearest and most powerful is Isaiah 55.

KJV Isaiah 55: 8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord.

9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

10 For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater:

11 So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.

Now that spring is arriving, people are especially aware of the power of rain and snow-melt to water the earth with usable nitrogen, the foundation of plant life. Rain and snow always have a powerful effect on the landscape, and many crops sown early pop out of the snow to begin their growth in the sun without many pests.

The cycle of rain and snow shows that growth is inevitable. No matter how scientific we pretend to be, God's Creation gives us seed for farmer and bread for the dinner table.

This is a comparison which allows no exceptions - like many in the Bible. 

The verses mean that God's Word is always accompanied by the Holy Spirit, and the Spirit always works exclusively through the Word. 

I first learned this when going through dozens of Old Testament books, especially ones on rabbinic lore. This is the message of the entire Bible, from Creation on, Old Testament and New Testament.

The Lutheran Reformation (actually the only Reformation) taught this when God gathered an unusual group of scholars at Wittenberg for translating and teaching the Scriptures. 

This was foreign to the papacy and still is.

Zwingli and Calvin rejected the efficacy of the Word. That is why they inevitably turn to rationalism and Unitarianism.

Pentecostals, not unlike the Catholics, have an ever-growing canon, because every dream and notion and dogma is from God - but without the Word. Pentecostals seem to have lost the thrill of tongue-speaking, so they are more like the Baptists.

Baptists who teach the inerrancy of the Word and avoid the double-predestination of Calvin are the closest to the Reformation.

Religions of the world that borrow the Scriptures dishonestly are in the same category of Enthusiasm, a term used by Luther to describe those who do not teach the Word/Holy Spirit connection. Enthusiasm is any kind of religion that divorces the Spirit from the Word; for instance, when the Pope declares a new dogma infallibly or when the LCMS-ELS-WELS says Objective Justification is true because they teach it at their dying seminaries.