Saturday, August 14, 2021

Luther's Sermon on the Pharisee and Tax Collector

The Pharisee and the Tax Collector - by Dore.



ELEVENTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY



Text. Luke 18:9-14. And he spake also this parable unto certain who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and set all others at nought: Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican. The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as the rest of men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. I fast twice in the week; I give tithes of all that I get. But the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote his breast, saying, God, be thou merciful to me a sinner. I say unto you, This man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be humbled; but he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.



1. Here again we have a picture and an example of the divine judgment on saints and good people. Two extraordinary persons are presented to us in this Gospel; one thoroughly good and truly pious; and one hypocritically pious. But before we take up the example and consider the terrible sentence, we must first notice that Luke here makes the impression as though righteousness came by works. For Luke is most accustomed to do this, as when we at present preach that faith alone saves, he observes that people are led to desire only to believe, and to neglect the power and fruit of faith. This John also does in his Epistle and James, where they show that faith cannot exist without works.

Thus Luke, in the beginning of his introduction, would speak as follows: I see indeed that many have preached how faith alone saves, by which they have brought the people to strive for a fictitious faith; hence I must also speak of works by which they can be assured of their faith, and prove it to the people by their acts. Consequently it sounds as though Luke everywhere taught that righteousness came by works; as you have recently heard: Forgive, and ye shall be forgiven; and, make unto yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness. And here it appears as though the publican had obtained his goodness by praying and smiting his breast. So this Gospel appears as though we should become good or pious by our works.

2. Now you have heard that a man, before he can do anything good, must by all means first be good. For the truth must always stand: “A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit;” and again, “An evil tree cannot bring forth good fruit.” Thus a man must first be good, before he can do good. So he also firmly concludes that the publican smote his breast, which proves the conclusion, that he had been good.

3. This has taken place and has been written to the end that we should open our eyes and not judge the people according to their outward appearance. To do this in this instance it is necessary to examine the hearts of both, and not judge according to mere external works. For when the heart is good, the whole man is good. For if I judged the publican according to his works, my judgment would soon be false. For nothing appears in him but sin. Again, if I judge the hypocrite or Pharisee according to his works, I will also miss the mark. For he stands at the holy place, makes the best prayer imaginable, for he praises and thanks God with grand works, he fasts, gives the tenth of all his goods, harms no one; in short, everything, both outwardly and inwardly, appears well with him.

4. As he judges, all men judge; no one can condemn such an upright and virtuous life. Who dare say that fasting is not good; or that to praise God and give everyone what we owe them is evil? When I see a priest, monk, or nun with such apparent noble conduct, I regard them as pious. Who can say otherwise? Hence if I am to judge whether this one is good and the other evil, I must be able to look into the hearts of both. But I cannot see into the heart, and must make the proper distinction from their works, as Christ says: “By their fruits ye shall know them.” Matthew 7:20.

5. He speaks of the publican as though he must have previously heard a word from God that touched his heart so that he believed it and thus became pious, as St. Paul says, Romans 10:17: “So faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ.” When the Word falls into the heart, then man becomes pure and good. But the Evangelist does not indicate that he now first heard the Gospel here, but that he heard it somewhere, it matters not where. For he says: “God be merciful to me a sinner.” This knowledge is above the powers of reason. And yet it must previously have been known to him that God is merciful, gracious and friendly to all those who confess their sins, who call upon him and long for grace. As he heard that God is gracious by virtue of his very nature, to all those who humble themselves and seek comfort in him. But to preach thus is always the pure Gospel.

6. Hence the beginning of goodness or godliness is not in us, but in the Word of God. God must first let his Word sound in our hearts by which we learn to know and to believe him, and afterwards do good works. So we must believe from this that the publican had learned God’s Word. If not, it would certainly have been impossible for him to acknowledge himself to be a poor sinner, as this Gospel reports. Indeed, it has a different appearance here, because St. Luke seems to insist more strongly on external works and appearances than on faith, and lays the emphasis more on the outward character and conduct than on the root and on the faith of the heart within.

Nevertheless we must conclude that the publican had previously heard the Gospel. Otherwise his smiting his breast and his humble confession would not have occurred, had he not previously had faith in his heart.

7. This is also proper fruit, since it promotes God’s honor; as God desires nothing but the offering of praise, as Psalm 50:23, says: “Whoso offereth the sacrifice of thanksgiving glorifieth me, and to him that ordereth his way aright, will I show the salvation of God.” In this way the publican also proceeds, gives God the offering of thanksgiving and secures to himself the forgiveness of sin, and praises God, puts himself to shame and exalts the truth above himself.

Therefore we must praise and commend his work, because he gives God the highest honor and true worship. For he says: “God, be thou merciful to me a sinner.” As though he would say: I am a rogue, this I confess, as you yourself know. Here you see that he confesses the truth, and is willing that God should reprove and revile him; yea, he does this himself, and casts himself down the very lowest, and with God he again rises upward, gives glory to God that he is gracious, kind and merciful. But in himself he finds nothing but sin. Wherefore these are the true fruits of faith.

8. Thus we have learned from his fruits the publican’s faith. But how shall we understand what Christ says: “This man went down to his house justified,” as he had already been just through faith, before he smote his breast? He certainly must have been just before. Why then does Christ say here: “He went down to his house justified?” This is what I have often said, if faith be true, it will break forth and bear fruit. If the tree is green and good, it will not cease to blossom forth in leaves and fruit. It does this by nature. I need not first command it and say: Look here, tree, bear apples.

For if the tree is there and is good, the fruit will follow unbidden. If faith is present works must follow. If I confess that I am a sinner, it must follow that I will say: Alas God! I am a rogue, do thou cause me to be good. So this publican cares for nothing and speaks freely, though he puts himself to shame before all people, he does not care for that, as <19B610> Psalm 116:10 says: “I believe, for I will speak. I was greatly afflicted,” and says: “God, be thou merciful to me a sinner!” As though he would say: I now see that I am lost, for I am a bad man, and acknowledge my sins. Unless I believe and hold to God’s mercy, and take the cup of the Savior and call upon God’s grace, I will be ruined.

9. Thus faith casts itself on God, and breaks forth and becomes certain through its works. When this takes place a person becomes known to me and to other people. For when I thus break forth I spare neither man nor devil, I cast myself down, and will have nothing to do with lofty affairs, and will regard myself as the poorest sinner on earth. This assures me of my faith. For this is what it says: “This man went down to his house justified.” Thus we attribute salvation as the principal thing to faith, and works as the witnesses of faith. They make one so certain that he concludes from the outward life that the faith is genuine.

10. We find this also in Abraham when he offers his son Isaac. Then God said: “For now I know that thou fearest God,” Genesis 22:12. Surely, if he had not feared God, he would not have offered his son; and by this we know the fruit to be thoroughly good. Let us now heartily apply this to ourselves.

11. This is why St. Luke and St. James have so much to say about works, so that one says: Yes, I will now believe, and then he goes and fabricates for himself a fictitious delusion, which hovers only on the lips as the foam on the water. No, no; faith is a living and an essential thing, which makes a new creature of man, changes his spirit and wholly and completely converts him. It goes to the foundation and there accomplishes a renewal of the entire man; so, if I have previously seen a sinner, I now see in his changed conduct, manner and life, that he believes. So high and great a thing is faith.

For this reason the Holy Spirit urges works, that they may be witnesses of faith. In those therefore in whom we cannot realize good works, we can immediately say and conclude: they heard of faith, but it did not sink into good soil. For if you continue in pride and lewdness, in greed and anger, and yet talk much of faith, St. Paul will come and say, 1 Corinthians 4:20, look here my dear sir, “the kingdom of God is not in word but in power.” It requires life and action, and is not brought about by mere talk.

12. Thus we err on both sides in saying, a person must only believe, then he will neglect to do good works and bring forth good fruits. Again, if you preach works, the people immediately comfort themselves and trust in works. Therefore we must walk upon the common path. Faith alone must make us good and save us. But to know whether faith is right and true, you must show it by your works. God cannot endure your dissembling, for this reason he has appointed you a sermon which praises works, which are only witnesses that you believe, and must be performed not thereby to merit anything, but they should be done freely and gratuitously toward our neighbor.

13. This must be practiced until it becomes a second nature with us. For thus God has also introduced works, as though he would say: if you believe, then you have the kingdom of heaven; and yet, in order that you may not deceive yourselves, do the works. To this the Lord refers in John 15:17, when he says to his disciples: “These things I command you, that ye may love one another.” And previous to this at the supper he said, John 13:34-35: “A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another: even as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.

By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.” And shortly before this he said, 5:5: “For I have given you an example, that ye also should do as I have done to you.”

As though he would say: Ye are my friends, but this the people will not know by your faith, but when you show the fruits of faith, and break forth in love, then they will know you. The fruits will not save you nor make you any friends, but they must show and prove that you are saved and are my friends. Therefore mark this well, that faith alone makes us good; but as faith lies concealed within me, and is a great life, a great treasure, therefore the works must come forth and bear witness of the faith, to praise God’s grace and condemn the works of men. You must cast your eyes to the earth and humiliate yourself before everyone, that you may also win your neighbor by your services; for this reason God lets you live, otherwise nothing would be better for you than to die and go to heaven. This you now also observe clearly in the good publican.

14. So you find two judgments: one according to faith, the other according to outward works. The foundation you have in that faith is concealed; this he feels, who believes; but that is not enough, it must express itself as you see above in the publican, who breaks forth in humility, so much as not to lift his eyes to heaven, smites on his breast and praises God, by which he helps me to say when my sins oppress me: Behold, the publican also was a sinner and said: “God, be thou merciful to me a sinner;” thus too, I will do.

By this will I also be strengthened so that when I see my sins I will think of his example, and with it comfort and strengthen myself, so that I can say:

Oh God, I see in the publican that thou art gracious to poor sinners. Faith the believer keeps for himself, but externally he communicates its fruits to other people.

15. The publican is on the right road and is twice justified; once through faith before God, and again by his works to me. Here he gives unto God his glory, and by faith repays him with praise. Also toward me he performs the duty of love, and puts words into my mouth and teaches me how to pray. Now he has paid all his debts toward God and man. So faith urges him to do; without however requiring anything from God as a reward of faith.

16. This is one character of the publican, who, according to faith which is the spiritual judgment, is acknowledged justified, while according to the flesh he is unprofitable. For the Pharisee passes and does not notice him, sees not his faith, lets him stand way back, and sees him alone in his sins, and knows not that God has been gracious to him, and converted and reformed him. So when a carnally minded man would condemn a sinner according to his sins, it is otherwise impossible, he must fail.

17. Let us now consider the fool, the Pharisee. Here are most beautiful works. In the first place he thanks God, fasts twice in the week, and all this to honor God, not St. Nicholas or St. Barnabas, he gives the tenth of all his goods, nor has he at any time committed adultery, has never done any one violence or robbed him of his goods. Thus he has conducted himself in an exemplary manner. This is a beautiful honest life, and excites our wonder and surprise. Truly, after the fashion of the world no one could find fault with him, yea, one must praise him. Yes, to be sure he does this himself.

18. But God is the first to come and say, that all the work of the Pharisee is blasphemy. God help us, what an awful sentence this is! Priests and nuns may well be terrified by it, and all their bones quake, as you scarcely ever find one of them as pious as this Pharisee. Would to God we could have many such hypocrites and Pharisees; for then they could be taught better things.

19. Well, what is the matter with the good man? Only this, he does not know his own heart. Here you see that we are our own greatest enemies, who close our eyes and hearts, and think we are as we feel. For if I should ask any such hypocrite: Sir, do you mean just what you say? he would take an oath, that it is not otherwise. But behold, see how deep God’s sword cuts, and pierces through all the recesses of the soul, Hebrews 4:12.

Here everything must go to ruin, or fall to the earth in humiliation, otherwise nothing can stand before God. Thus a pious woman must here fall down and kiss the vilest harlot’s feet, yea, her footprints.

20. Now let us better see and hear what the Lord says to this. There stands the publican and humbles himself, says nothing of fasting, nothing of his good works, nor of anything. Yet the Lord says that his sins are not so great as the sins of the hypocrite; even in spite of anyone now exalting himself above the lowest sinner. If I exalt myself a finger’s breadth above my neighbor, or the vilest sinner, then am I cast down. For the publican during his whole life did not do as many and as great sins as this Pharisee does here when he says: I thank thee God that I am not as other men are; and lies enough to burst all heaven. From him you hear no word like: “God, be thou merciful to me a sinner?’ God’s mercy, sympathy, patience and love are all forgotten by him, while God is nothing but pure mercy, and he who does not know this, thinks there is no God, as in Psalm 14:1: “The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.” So it is with an unbeliever who does not know himself. Therefore I say one thing more, if he had committed the vilest sin and deflowered virgins, it would not have been as bad as when he says: “I thank thee God, that I am not as the rest of men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican.” Yes, yes, do I hear you have no need of God and despise his goodness, mercy, love and everything that God is? Behold, these are thy sins. Hence the public gross sins that break out are insignificant; but unbelief which is in the heart and we cannot see, this is the real sin in which monks and priests strut forth; these lost and corrupt ones are sunk head and ears in this sin, and pretend to be entirely free from it.

21. Further, since he has now blasphemed God and lied to him, because he is unwilling to confess his sins, he falls further and sins against love to his neighbor, in that he says: “Even as this publican.” He could not bear his presence without blaming and condemning him. Here all commandments are abolished and transgressed, for he denies God and does his neighbor no good. In this way he goes to ruin, because he has not obeyed a letter of the law. For if he had said: Oh God, we are all sinners, this poor sinner is also like myself and all the rest: and had he joined the congregation and said:

Oh God, be merciful unto us! then he would have fulfilled God’s commandment, namely, the first, in that he gave God the honor and the praise, and had he afterwards said: Oh God, I see this one is a sinner, in the jaws of the devil; dear Lord, help him. ‘ and had he thus brought him to God and prayed to God for him, he would then also have obeyed the other commandment of Christian love as Paul says, Galatians 6:2, and teaches: “Bear ye one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ.”

22. Now he comes and praises himself that he is just. He has a poisonous, wicked heart, who praises himself most gloriously on account of his pretended good works, how he fasted and gave the tenth of all he had.

Hence he is so full of hatred to his neighbor, if God allowed him to judge, he would plunge the poor publican down into the deepest hell. Behold, is not this a wicked heart and terrible to hear, that I would all men should go to ruin, if only I be praised? Yet all this is so finely decorated and adorned by external conduct, that no one can censure it. Here we see how we are to know the tree from its fruits. For when I view his heart with spiritual eyes, I recognize it is full of blasphemy and hatred to his neighbor. From these fruits I know that the tree is evil. For works would not be evil in themselves, but the evil root in the heart makes them evil. This is set before us that we may beware and guard ourselves against it.

23. Again, on the other hand, examine the heart also of the publican. Here we find that he believes. Hence his works are good and of service to the whole world, for he teaches that a man should humble himself and praise God. On the contrary the other with his works makes saints who are puffed up and proud of heart; for he is entrapped in sins, his soul is condemned, and is fast in the jaws of the devil, and the high minded knave steps forth and praises himself, because his neighbor over there is a sinner. To sum up all, he misleads the whole world with his hypocritical life. Thus we must judge the fruits with spiritual eyes as we have now judged these two; then we will know the tree whether it be good or evil.

24. Now, where did I obtain this judgment? Here: God has given me his law like a mirror, in which I see what is good and evil. It says: Love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and thy neighbor as thyself,” Deuteronomy 6:5, Matthew 22:37. ‘Now the works of the publican praise God and benefit the whole world, because they teach us to know, and show us the way of God our Savior. Therefore they are good because they praise God and benefit our neighbor. On the other hand, the hypocrite struts forth and blasphemes God, and with his corrupt life misleads the whole world.

25. I should also speak of the great and shameful vice of slander, when one belies another, exposes him and speaks evil of him; while we are all alike after all, and no one has a reason to exalt himself above another. But that the government judges and punishes crime, it does by virtue of its office.

For it wields the sword to make the transgressor fear. For God will not tolerate sin, and desires that the wicked have no rest, as the prophet Isaiah says, Isaiah48:22: “There is no peace, saith Jehovah, to the wicked.”

Therefore where God does not internally disturb sinners, he will wipe out sin by fire and water, that they can have no peace from without. When such sins are to be punished, the officers, judges and people should think thus:

Oh God! although I myself am a poor sinner and a much greater one than this person, and a much greater thief and adulterer than this one; still I will execute my office and leave him no rest in his sins and belabor him; for this is thy divine command. Concerning this I have said more on other occasions, especially in my book on the Civil Government, which you can road yourself; for the present let this suffice, and pray God for grace.

Does Indifference about the Bible Indicate a Shallow Attitude Toward the Gospel?

 

Mirthless Mark and Matt the Fatt have worked with ELCA Bishop Liz since 2013.

Two concepts unite ELCA with the LCMS, WELS, ELS, and the CLC (sic).

1. The entire world is justified without faith - Objective Justification.

2. Any Bible will do - except the King James Version.

ELDONA disagrees with OJ, but remains indifferent about Bibles.


Calvinists have no trouble with the proliferation of Bibles, because they teach the Word of God is dead, unless someone makes it germane and appealing.

The abandonment of the KJV is the direct result of loss of faith in the power and efficacy of the Word. Once the self-appointed text experts explained how many errors there were in the Bible manuscripts, the worn path to false religion was beaten into a four-lane highway - going only one way - to apostasy.

Professor Kurt Marquart gave a lecture where he admitted to thousands of errors in the Traditional - or Majority Text. But he also added that the vast majority of these were simply copying errors. 

All printed and copied works have errors, some so subtle that no one catches them until the mistakes are distributed far and wide. Pretending that was not so, the self-appointed text experts decided they could distill the original text from studying the tea leaves of text criticism. (Example - I started the previous sentence with Pretty because the first four letters are the same as Pretending. I did not make this mistake on purpose, so I had to think about what I was trying to say when typing fast. Scholars could have argued for centuries - "He probably meant "Pity." Or another - "That may have been a slang term long ago. We know he was always playing with words. Anyway, scholars are divided."

Because one manuscript drops the ending of Mark - compared to almost all the 7,000 with Mark 16:9-20 - rationalists jumped on the idea that the so-called primitive Gospel of Mark did not originally have or know of a resurrection of Christ.

Consider this - Gospel lessons are often marked in Bibles. I used a pulpit Bible that marked the selections of the Church Years Sundays - and the endings. A small phrase showed the ending so the minister would not go on and on.

So the Easter Sunday Gospel in Greek would be Mark 16:1-8, with the end of the lesson marked as telos, the Greek word for end.

The sleepy copyist could have omitted verses 9-20, so it was not the end of the lesson but the end of the book as he nodded off. Or it was torn off.

But - the ESV and NIV bracket 9-20, suggesting that passage does not belong and was not written by Mark.

The domains of Mirthless Mark and Matt the Fatt make big money from using the modern Bibles in their materials and selling them.



Don't Fail To Miss This One - WELS Calvinist Worship - NIV Endorsed and Endorsing

 






Why do the hymnals keep getting worse, while claiming The Lutheran Hymnal is repugnant?

That tactic worked in throwing the KJV under the bus, so they did the same with The Lutheran Hymnal.





Brug would say, "They are not ready for this...yet.



How much loot is this going to extract from each congregation?

Why does WELS need 25 new Calvinist hymns? Answer - the new hymns will make more sense with the NIV.






Friday, August 13, 2021

Please Splash, Shove, and Jostle at Our Swimming Pool

 


I check the two kitchen windows during the day. This morning I saw nine Starlings in one kiddie pool. I position the two pools so they have shallow water and no water at all on one end - their beach. Birds do not like deeper pools. They love having enough just so they can dip their heads and let the water run over their backs to their tail-feathers.

The Starlings take turns, with two standing on the lid and dropping down into the crowd to shove two out of the water. They continually do this in sharing the fun. They could split up into two groups, but they seem to enjoy togetherness more than water. They always arrive in groups, keeping a scout watching while they eat or bathe, and taking off as a flock when the scout says, "Let's go."

During playtime I saw a streak of red. The Cardinals - far more dignified - show up in various ways to remind me of their need for food. I put a handful of almonds on each barrel, and one Cardinal landed alone, shocked by choice food around his claws. I backed away so he could eat in peace and perhaps call Mrs. Cardinal over for her share.

The best moment of the day was a coffee session on the front porch. I have three Hummingbird feeder handers - courtesy of Ranger Bob - two very close to the porch, but one next to the porch, which is only inches above the ground.

I moved the middle one next to the porch so it would be Bob while he enjoyed coffee. The Hummingbird hovered over the feeder, going from "flower" to "flower," a foot away from Bob. We enjoyed every dip of the Hummingbird  into the plastic nectar flower.

That moment was the result of two years of feeding and slowly walking the feeders closer to the porch. 

Time invested will bring intangible rewards.



Monarch Butterfly bait (milkweed) - it works.





Thursday, August 12, 2021

Theodore P. Letis - Text Scholar

 


Resources about Letis are found here - lots of links.


More Letis links are here. Let us begin.

How WELS-LCMS-ELS-ELDONUTs Shot Themsevles in Both Cloven Feet at Once

 



The fraud committed by WELS-LCMS-ELS-ELDONUTs is breath-taking in scope, the lies piled high and deep, offered in solemn piety and brazen hypocrisy.

Let us look at a few excuses for the NIV, since the ESV, RSV, and BrugSV are not much better. Answers are in John Deere green, as opposed to faux-purple.

Pan-Lutheran Association of Non-Believers claim - "Children and young folk cannot understand the King James Version, so this will make our Christian education materials better, from diaper academy to seminary."

Answer - The NIV changes all the time, but far more promiscuously than the NewKJV, which also changes without warning. One benefit for the publisher is the ability to keep the copyright fresh. Another benefit, as revealed in WELS, is to block all use of the old NIV so the materials must be published with the New Incredibly-Horrid Version. The faculty at Northwestern College (RIP) whined about the NIV but did nothing. 



Pan-Lutheran Association of Non-Believers -"The NIV-ESV-RSV-Brug-SV, yea even the New KJV use the original text (sic) rules of Tischendorf, Bengel, Westcott-Hort, Nestle, Aland, and Eugene Nida. These curated copies (though very few in number, a tiny minority) are modern, scientific, and go back to the earliest days, when the first authors did not claim the divinity of Jesus or His Virgin Birth."

Answer - The abandonment of the Majority or Traditional Text is the work of buddies Westcott and Hort, who loathed the Traditional Text and mooned and groaned about their devotion to Mary. One of these daft men said he preferred "a Mary religion" to a "Jesus religion." How scientific was their approach, which offered no notes to explain their deletions from the Word of God, secretly handed to the KJV Revision Committee and published with Revision in the 19th century. The Revision and the Westcott-Hort Greek NT were shunned like Luther in WELS-LCMS. However, the dishonest, anti-Christian, and unscholarly approach caught on with the apostate church leaders.

Pan-Lutheran Association of Non-Believers - "The truth of the Bible comes through with these many styles and language levels. We needed a Dynamic Equivalence instead of a word-for-word translation, which is wooden, hard to follow, and detrimental to our mission goals."

Answer - I will demonstrate a word-for-word translation from the Greek, John 1:1

εν αρχη ην ο λογος και ο λογος ην προς τον θεον και θεος ην ο λογος

Word-for-word. In beginning was the Word and the Word was with the God and God was the Word.

KJV John 1:In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Eugene Nida's Dynamic Equivalence is a license to throw anything in the translation paraphrase (let's be honest) and also yeet anything out that offends the apostate handling the butchered text. 

So this is a double corruption. 

  • First of all, the Hebrew and Greek texts have been butchered by rationalists who confess that the Sacred Scriptures are just another book by man about God or gods. 
  • Secondly, the Nida demons feel free about - and brag about - making their creations as different as possible.



Pan-Lutheran Association of Non-Believers - "Our modern Bibles are carefully created by vast numbers of curated Biblical scholars, most of them with PhDs though some sects - like WELS and ELDONA - are allergic to genuine doctorates when an STM or DMin is so much easier. The KJV came from clergy, for pity's sake, not from the musty halls of Harvard, Fuller, and the Willow Creek Academy."

Answer - The heritage of the KJV is great and praiseworthy at every level. 
The Hebrew and Greek texts come from the Christian Church, where thousands of almost identical Greek New Testament texts were preserved in the Byzantine Empire. How many? I see numbers ranging from 5,000 to 7,000 individual manuscripts - all in the Traditional Text arena. 

In contrast - Westcott and Hort built their phony Greek New Testament with five manuscripts, 1/1000th of the Majority or Traditional Text. Two of these "superb" sources came from Tischendorf, a self-promoting, lying popinjay. His two treasures - Sinaiticus and Vaticanus - do not agree with each other.

Erasmus, an independent scholar, put together the Greek New Testament (Traditional Text) which Luther and the others used. 

Luther gathered a group of brilliant believers who were highly skilled in languages, Melanchthon being one of the greatest in Europe. They did their work with a burning stake - not a posh retirement - in their futures. 

Enter William Tyndale, an English genius in languages. He came to Germany in Luther's time to escape the king's wrath and to learn more.  Facts are sketchy, but his work became the standard and model for all English translations afterwards. As some say, they were all Tyndale Bibles, even if named Geneva, Bishops, or Coverdale.

The King James editors/translators were the best minds in the country at the peak of England's development of the language and arts. They were clergy, bishops, scholars, all believers. They honored the Word of God, not themselves. 

The ways these modern Bible boys and girls preen and gawk in the mirror about their superiority to the KJV is a laugh. The modernists are too smart for us guys who work for a living and actually serve congregations, visiting people, marrying couples, burying those translated into eternal life. 

Because the NIV-ESV-RSV-BrugSV criminals are so educated, they produce footnotes to reverse the meaning of the text.

The footnotes are the third great corruption of the Bible. Do not miss that, because it is devilishly clever and efficacious in destroying faith in Jesus Christ, the purpose of the Bible. 

Isaiah 7:10 - He will be born of a virgin (note - or a young woman). The Virgin Birth and Incarnation are denied in the note. This two-step goes back to the Marxist National Council of Churches Revised Standard Version, denying the Virgin Birth, then dropping the denial to a footnote.

New KJV - Nice marketing. The entire Bible looks to the Nestle Aland in the notes, meaning - the meaning could be the opposite, you know. Nestle Aland, the snip and clip Greek New Testament is cleverly noted as NU, pronounced NEW, for Nestle United Bible Societies. The Catholics are welcome parties of the United Bible Societies now. They have more than a seat at the table. They own the table and rent the chairs to the crypto-Unitarian Protestants. The NKJV uses (M) for the Majority Text in the footnotes. Using only that M is as useful and transparent as a broken GPS in the car. 

"The less one believes in the Biblical message, the more scholarly he or she is." - That is the standard ever since Karl Barth, his mistress and co-author Charlotte Kirschbaum, Paul Tillich, and the rest. It started much earlier in the 19th century, and the new Bibles are either the cause or the effect of this change to apostasy.

Look up Acts 8:37 KJV on Bible Gateway, which is a thrall of the NIV. But look anyway and press the link for ALL the translations of Acts 8:37.

Here is the link for Mequon graduates. They are a bit slow in Mordor.

The NIV and ESV have erased that verse - just like Thomas Jefferson.

If Sam Cooke Were WELS

 

 Apologies to Sam Cooke for stealing his classic song.


Don't know much about theology

Don't know much about the KJV

Don't know much about a Hebrew book

Don't know much about the Greek I took


[Chorus 1]

But I do know that I love WELS

And I know that if She loves me, too

What a wonderful world this would be


[Verse 2]

Don't know much about the liturgy

Don't know much epistemology

Don't know much about math, a bore

Don't know what a library's for.


[Chorus 2]

But I do know Church Growth principles

And if we all could learn more rules

What a Calvinist world this would be


[Bridge]

Now, I don't claim to be an A student

But I'm trying to be C.

For maybe by being a C student, baby

I can win  a call for me.




Boatloads of Hypocrisy from WELS - How About - Hands Off The Runner on His Mark?

 

 Luke 8:17 For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad.

Waging the war for godly sexuality - WELS Parody of Itself

“Abuse. Divorce. Abortion. Pornography. People want to talk about these issues; they’re just scared to go first. We’re trying to help people go first.”

WELS Pastor Ski has helpfully started conversations in their schools and churches, 
serving his Father Below.


Caleb Schultz, pastor at Cross of Life, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, is talking about Conquerors through Christ, a ministry of WELS Special Ministries that exists to help people resist, reject, and recover from pornography use or addiction.

 If WELS children are not properly trained, prep schools like Michigan Lutheran Seminary make sure they learn about cross-dressing from their school's leaders - such luminaries as John Lawrenz and John Brenner. This kind of hazing is basic to WELS high schools, college, and seminary.


Conquerors through Christ logoThe Conquerors through Christ website was developed eight years ago, mainly to help those who are addicted to pornography. It has recently been redesigned, expanded to offer resources that can be used by any person—parents, pastors, teachers, spouses, friends—to combat the sin of pornography.

“I think our culture is increasingly saying this ministry is not necessary, particularly for Christians in your average congregation,” says Schultz, spokesperson for Conquerors through Christ. “This is unfortunate because all the statistics say [pornography] is way more common than we like to admit.”

How many WELS parents know about hazing and abusing The Sprinter?
It is a male WELS tradition.

One statistic Schultz shares is that by sixth grade, many children have been exposed to pornography in some way. “It’s often not their fault,” he says. “They’re scrolling through Instagram or watching videos on TikTok, and they take one wrong click and they’re in a place they shouldn’t be.”

Several of the new resources Conquerors through Christ has developed are to help parents, pastors, and teachers talk to children and young adults about sex and pornography. The Parent Support System offers age-appropriate resources for parents to use at home with children ages 2 through 12. A middle school lesson on the Sixth Commandment is perfect for use in a Catechism class. A high school curriculum provides teachers and youth group leaders opportunities to have biblical discussions on the topic with teenagers.

“We’re not trying to equip you to do an event, to have ‘the talk,’ ” says Brad Snyder, pastor at Cross of Christ, Boise, Idaho, and Conquerors through Christ team member. “It’s a process of teaching your children about godly sexuality and the threats that are there.”

Having those conversations are important, Snyder says, because children are learning a lot about sex from friends, social media, and television. “We want them to learn from you, their parents,” he stresses.

Adam and Steve - If a pastor leads a WELS congregation in hosting a cross-dressing picnic, photographing it, and posting the pictures in public, what actions are taken? He is immediately featured as a keynote speaker for a WELS event.

 Photographic evidence shows that a WELS child will be putting makeup on a man before he or she is old enough for elementary school.


All of these resources fall into the “resist” category—helping to prevent the first click or teaching how to respond when unexpectedly faced with pornography. Materials on rejecting pornography also are available for those who have fallen into this sin. “We’re going to drown you in the gospel,” says Schultz. “You already are a conqueror through Christ.” For those who are close to someone struggling with a pornography addiction, recovery resources—including a directory of qualified Christian counselors—provide support.

 Party in the MLC video - This was loved by Martin Luther College students, uploaded to YouTube, and also posted/defended on Facebook.


Adding a fourth category—rejoice—is being discussed. It will focus on what the Bible says about godly sexuality.

In the end, Schultz stresses that combating pornography is a battle we all need to fight. “There is hope in a battle that seems so dark, regardless of what side of it you are on—if you’re a user or know a user or are a parent hoping your children don’t become users.”

Learn more at conquerorsthroughchrist.net.

Volume 108, Number 8
Issue: August 2021


WELS Pastors Glende (left) and Ski (right) proudly posted their pose with Katy Perry on their Facebook pages - so eager to start a conversation.


Hands Off the Original Biblical Text and the King James Version -
The WELS Leaders Do the Slashing and Burning To Give You
Leftwing Double-talk, Instead of God's Word!

 

 This scissoring is exactly what WELS did in rejecting the King James Version and Its Traditional Hebrew and Greek Texts. They kicked pastors out for criticizing the precious NIV Bible, which is now even worse than before. 

Hands off the Bible! - WELS Fulminations in Royal Purple

The Bible is God’s Word. He doesn’t want us to pick and choose what we believe. 

[So why does WELS pick and choose? Why were they so feeble in celebrating the Reformation's 500th Anniversary? WELS - like the rest of the apostates - only approves bad, heavily edited, Calvinistic, fad paraphrases that last as long as a July frost - but make big bucks for them. Oh yes, printing NEW Bibles is like printing money.]


There are few acts in the Bible more brazen than this one by Jehoiakim, the king of Judah: “Whenever Jehudi had read three or four columns of the scroll, the king cut them off with a scribe’s knife and threw them into the firepot, until the entire scroll was burned in the fire” (Jeremiah 36:23). Coolly and methodically, the king of God’s chosen people sliced up the prophet Jeremiah’s message from the Lord and tossed the pieces into a fire.



[GJ - What did WELS do with the Great Commission and the Sacraments in their sacred NIV? Gone! Missing! Not endorsed by Fuller Seminary, Willow Crick, and the National Council of Churches! Not sensitive!]

Centuries later, United States President Thomas Jefferson took a similar but less dramatic approach toward the pages of the New Testament. With razor blade in hand, Jefferson excised from the New Testament anything that smacked of the supernatural. What remained was a little volume titled The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth. Sadly, the book ends with these words: “There laid they Jesus: and rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre and departed.” No resurrection. No ascension. Those events did not agree with Jefferson’s idea of God, so the president excluded them from his edition of the Bible.

[GJ - The fathers of the modern Greek New Testament are Westcott and Hort, who "loathed the Traditional Text" and worshiped Mary. Their fanclub includes Nestle and Aland and Eugene Nida. They cut out what they did not like because they hated the 5,000 examples of the Traditional Text and cling to Sinaiticus and Vaticanus copies that Tischendorf mysteriously discovered and called the best, the earliest, the fabulous-est copies. ELCA has exactly the same position on the Bible as the WELS, LCMS, ELS, CLC, and ELDONUTs.]

Mishandling Scripture

People today, even self-identified Christians, are not likely to remove paragraphs or pages from their Bibles because they object to their message. What they do instead is keep their Bibles intact while rejecting some of the content. For example, some leave “For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day” (Exodus 20:11) in their Bibles, but they reject the Bible’s teaching of creation. “You can’t ignore the science,” they say. “Evolution explains how this world came about.” Others do not physically remove the passage, “Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me” (Psalm 51:5) from their Bibles, but they reject the Bible’s teaching of original sin. “It’s not fair,” they argue, “that somebody should be considered guilty before God without any wrongdoing on his or her part.”

[GJ - Tell us about it, O Snake-oil Salesman! WELS/ELS/LCMS deny, repudiate, and excommunicate those who teach the Chief Article of Christianity - Justification by Faith. They invent an Objective Justification not found anywhere in the Bible, Luther, the Book of Concord, and faithful Lutherans.]

Still others who belong to Christian congregations do not delete a passage like Matthew 25:46 (“Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”), but they deny the Bible’s teaching of hell. “The God I believe in would never send anyone to hell forever,” they contend, pointing to 1 John 4:8, “God is love.”

[GJ - WELS/ELS/LCMS teach that the entire world was absolved the moment Christ died on the cross, or the moment He rose from the dead. Yes - they are that foul, stupid, and double-tongued.]



In our world today some Christians do not cut out the words, “Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Corinthians 6:9,10), yet they dismiss what the Bible teaches about homosexuality. “Times are different,” they maintain. “What people do in their own lives is up to them. Who am I to judge?”

[GJ - Do not ask about the way WELS upperclassmen treat the Runner on His Mark. Or ask about their hazing rituals, or their need to cross-dress at the prep, college, seminary, and parish level. Did a seminarian at Mequon sexually assault a younger man who was visiting the seminary the first time? Who was punished? - the victim.]

Most keep Bible passages such as, “No one will be declared righteous in God’s sight by the works of the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of our sin” (Romans 3:20) in their Bibles, but they still set aside the Bible’s teaching of salvation by grace through faith. “It seems to me,” people say, “that what I do in life should matter to God and that the good things I do should count for something.”

The truthfulness of God’s Word means that any problem with the content of the Bible lies with
the reader not the Author. 

[GJ - What about the editors who removed or bracketed the ending of Mark? ditto - the many complete references to the divinity Christ in the Traditional, KJV text?] 

You can probably think of other verses that remain in people’s Bibles but whose truths they reject. If we are honest, we can likely come up with a list of passages and teachings that we struggle to accept.

[GJ - Most certainly anyone with a KJV and a Gausewitz can find a long list of what WELS "struggles to accept." Not really - the struggle disappeared as they began extending the Left Foot of Fellowship to anyone who disagreed with them.]

None of this mishandling of Scripture can be justified. It’s wrong when people claim faith in Jesus and then discard biblical teachings. God explicitly forbids people from tampering with his Word. “Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it” (Deuteronomy 4:2). God even attaches a warning to the directive not to mishandle his Word (Revelation 22:18,19). A God who is concerned about the truth speaks like that.

[GJ - Tell us how WELS agrees with all the mainline denominations on promoting the altered Bibles while rejecting, laughing at, and removing the KJV.]

Handing down truth

It was to a group of Jews who wanted to stone him to death on a winter day in the temple courts in Jerusalem that Jesus said, “Scripture cannot be set aside” (John 10:35). People can try to ignore or reject what God says in the Bible, but their words and attitudes do not negate the Bible’s truthfulness. God’s Word remains true. How true? In a prayer to his heavenly Father, Jesus said, “Your word is truth” (John 17:17). You notice that the Lord did not qualify or quantify the truthfulness of God’s Word by saying, “Most of your word is true” or “The great majority of your word is true.” No, “Your word—all of it—is truth.” The truthfulness of God’s Word means that any problem with the content of the Bible lies with the reader not the Author.

[GJ - KJV John 10:35 If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken.  και ου δυναται λυθηναι η γραφη - broken not set aside, but Mirthless Mark says all translations (except the KJV) are inspired.]

The truth of God’s Word is that all people are sinners deserving God’s eternal punishment. The truth of God’s Word is that all people are the objects of God’s forgiving love in Christ. The truthfulness of God’s Word is not, however, limited to those two main teachings of the Bible. God’s Word is truthful in everything it says.

Properly handling the truth

Lay evangelist Dwight Moody was well known for his revival services and his simple faith. One day a person approached Moody with a difficult section of Scripture and asked him for an explanation. Moody responded, “I can’t explain it.” That response elicited a follow-up question, “Well, how do you understand it?” To that, the evangelist replied, “I don’t understand it.” Trying again, the inquirer asked, “Well, what do you make of it?” Moody answered, “I don’t make anything of it.” Finally, the person asked with an air of exasperation, “What do you do with it?” “I simply believe it,” came the reply.



[GJ - But WELS only believes what the simpleton Mequon teachers force upon the students. DP Buchholz - "I am sorry that you have departed from the doctrine your seminary professors taught you." (paraphrased) Not departed from the Scriptures, Luther, or the Book of Concord. The WELS leaders and pastors - as a whole - loathe the KJV and the Book of Concord.]

Because the Bible is the Word of our God whose thoughts are not our thoughts and whose ways are higher than our ways (Isaiah 55:8,9), we can expect it to contain content that is challenging to our minds. The question is, what do we do with such content? God’s will is that we have a “hands-off” approach: We do not change his Word or reject it. More than that, God’s will is that we have a “hands-on” approach: We hold his Word in our hands, reading it and believing it all through the power of the Holy Spirit.



[GJ - Isaiah is cited but the efficacy of the Word is omitted. That is a foundation passage, so the author's dibbling with Isaiah shows WELS is a sect with no foundation except the Enthusiasm of Calvinist, Pentecostals, and ELCA.]

“Jeremiah took another scroll and gave it to the scribe Baruch son of Neriah, and as Jeremiah dictated, Baruch wrote on it all the words of the scroll that Jehoiakim king of Judah had burned in the fire. And many similar words were added to them” (Jeremiah 36:32). Incinerating the Word of God was not a problem for Jeremiah or the Lord; God directed the prophet to draft a replacement scroll.

“By pow’rs of empire banned and burned, . . . The Word still stands, the Christian’s trust” (Christian Worship 291:2).

Author: James F. Pope
Volume 108, Number 6
Issue: June 2021