Eighth Commandment - The Forgotten Paragraph

All this has been said regarding secret sins. But where the sin is quite public so that the judge and everybody know it, you can without any sin avoid him and let him go, because he has brought himself into disgrace, and you may also publicly testify concerning him. For when a matter is public in the light of day, there can be no slandering or false judging or testifying; as, when we now reprove the Pope with his doctrine, which is publicly set forth in books and proclaimed in all the world. For where the sin is public, the reproof also must be public, that every one may learn to guard against it. (The Ten Commandments, #284The Large Catechism, Book of Concord)

This paragraph covers two matters. One is law-breaking. The other is doctrinal. Clearly, a district president, minister, or vicar who has been convicted by a jury and sent to prison would be identified and shunned under this rubric. However, the organizations cover up for these people so that the blue-haired ladies who give all the money do not have a stroke and cancel their pledges. ("Thank heavens," say the Tetzels, "for irrevocable gift trusts.") Therefore, we find actual criminals given the best possible PR, silence, encouraging others to follow their example.

The second part is passed over quickly in this passage but occupies all of Luther's writing. As someone mentioned years ago, Luther did not discover the Gospel. He did not become the first of his generation to teach the Gospel. His distinction was to teach the Gospel and declare what was contrary to the Gospel. The Antichrist could tolerate the Gospel alone, but he could not tolerate being called a false teacher. Luther did this throughout his writings and sermons. The Book of Concord is known for its antithetical statesments as well (Formula of Concord).

The false teachers today constantly run under the shelter of the Eighth Commandment. They are being slandered when their doctrine is questioned. One notable experience took place when I identified Paul Kelm endorsing a pan-Lutheran Church Growth conference. Frosty Bivens immediately stood up and said, "I want to defend Paul Kelm's good name." I wondered to myself, "What does that have to do with the truth?"

I was asked to prove Kelm's endorsement. I produced it in its original form. Bivens then said, "Maybe this was printed without his permission." Slick Brenner noted that this was not an isolated accident with Kelm. The Church Growth chorus always chimed in for each other and knew the DPs would always be their Amen Corner. Moreover, the Church Growth chorus is pan-Lutheran: their loyalty knows no bounds.

Yelling "Slander" falsely is itself a personal attack, and it is perversely evil. However, to counter by saying, "No you are a slanderer" is a gigantic waste of breath. Readers of Ichabod would be surprised at how nasty some Lutherans are in secret when they pose as mild and moderate in public.

Any attempt to deal with false doctrine will be met with demonic rage. If someone has published an error, such as Valleskey's disastrous We Believe, Therefore We Speak, his halleluia chorus for the Church Growth Movement, then his words are worthy of being dissected. I have published the verbatim quotations of these Fuller students many times. Oh my, how they howl in protest. "They were published out of context!" That encouraged me to quote even larger sections. The cries of injustice grew even louder, reaching the ears of their Father Below.

R. Schulz posted an excellent comment already. He is correct. The false teachers demand that their published errors be addressed privately, confusing the Eighth Commandment with Matthew 19. That does not work either. When I talked to various WELS pastors about what they were doing, a future DP told me, "You are so direct that it is causing great consternation."

WELS Pastor Stadler called me up in a fury because I published something against his published essay, called Heirs Together. I renamed it Errorists Together. He told me wrathfully that I should have "withstood him to his face." Very KingJamesish. It sounded well rehearsed. So I said, "Do you want to know what I think about your essay?" He said, "No."

When pastors went to Paul Kelm about his Church Growth fanaticism, nothing happened.

When ELS pastors had trouble with the sect's Public Ministry of the WELS document, they were defenestrated. I do not have the newest editions of the Book of Concord, but I suspect that the PMW is not there...yet.

Everyone benefits when doctrine is discussed and debated. The apostates knew what they were doing when they outlawed any form of dialogue about their errors. That is a sin against the Holy Spirit. The nasties are saying right now, "There he goes again." I have heard WELS pastors say, "The Holy Spirit put the circuit pastor in that office. Who am I to question his decisions?" Questioning any errorist in WELS is a confrontation with God Almighty. Count on it being something other than a still, small voice.