The Love Shack.
Bruce is on the board of Church and Change.
From Bailing Water:
Monday, November 5, 2007
Effective vs. Efficacious - explained
Below is an explanation of the 3 relevancy scenarios from the Church and Change presenter.
------------
1. Information that does not address your felt need is perceived as irrelevant. For example offering an investment seminar for a congregation of young people who carry a great deal of credit card debt. Yes, they will need investment planning in the future but their immediate need will be getting a handle on their debt.
2. Informaton that you aren’t convinced you will ever need is perceived as irrelevant. For example, people who volunteer to lead a small group Bible study may understand they need biblical training but not training in group dynamics. After one meeting, they then realize they need some training in group dynamics and realize it is very relevant.
3. An uncomfortable context can distract us to the point where we perceive relevant information as irrelevant. For example, distracting church decor, cleanliness issues, bad PA, too cold, no nursing mom, or a confusing worship format.
To be relevant . . .
1. We have to be aware of current felt needs.
2. We need to elevate the awareness of unfelt needs (sin, need for a Savior, real purpose in life) of our audience before we start to address these needs.
3. We need to address needs in a way that people consider helpful.
jp
***
GJ - JP probably stands for John Parlow, the senior pastor where Kelm works.
Kelm does not believe the Word of God is effective. His published work, available to all, is a farrago of Lutheran statements corrected immediately by Reformed doctrine, his true love.
Others who join this chant are Olson, Huebner, Wayne Mueller, and their own Bruce Becker, who called Kelm to do more of the same, synod-wide.
