
A Latvian Bars Ordaining Women
By ALESSANDRA STANLEY,
Published: Wednesday, August 3, 1994
The oldest working pastor in the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Latvia is 93. The youngest, ordained this year, is 18. The Archbishop of Latvia says the shortage of pastors in his country is so extreme that he has to take anyone he can get.
Except women.
In defiance of his predecessor in Latvia and almost all the larger Lutheran churches around the world, Archbishop Janis Vanags refuses to ordain women.
"It is true we need pastors very much," the Archbishop said, "but it is better to do without them than to do something against the will of God."
The rock-hard views of the 35-year-old Archbishop, who was elected six months ago, have bitterly divided Latvia's largest denomination. Deeper Than Usual Rift
Many other Protestant denominations are divided over the ordination of women. The Missouri Synod of the Lutheran Church, one of the largest in America, still refuses. But the rift seems deeper here, where the Lutheran Church is so closely identified with Latvian nationalism.
Mostly, the battle reflects a trend throughout the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe: Even after the collapse of Communism, faiths forged in persecution remain far more conservative than those nurtured in the West.
The issue of ordination of women is not just an internal dispute in Latvia. The issue has also alienated the Latvian-based church from branches in Europe and the Americas that were established by Latvians who fled the Communists in 1940.
This is particularly true of the American branch, a church that grew large and prosperous in exile. Talk of reuniting the Latvian church and its exile branch has stopped, and instead, some Western church leaders are quietly planning to cut back on money sent to Riga. Dispute in Estonia
The same dispute simmers in neighboring Estonia, where only 4 of the country's 100 pastors are women. But there, the Archbishop does not openly oppose ordination. In Lithuania, too, women can be ordained.
"I know of no other place where the ordination of women was started, and then stopped," said Archbishop Elmar Ernst Rozitis, who from Germany heads the Latvian Lutheran Church abroad. "At this time I see no real possibility of a resolution."
Sarmite Fisere, who became a pastor in 1989, the day the Synod in Latvia voted to ordain women, is particularly frustrated.
"It makes no sense," said Ms. Fisere, one of nine women who were ordained before Archbishop Vanags took office. He has not interfered with their work.
Latvia, with 2 million inhabitants, has about 300,000 Lutherans and only 89 ministers and 39 lay preachers to guide them. Ms. Fisere, for instance, is the only Lutheran minister in the village of Ogre (population 28,000). "The need is so deep, and the people have accepted us women completely," she said. Infecting Young Pastors
She said Archbishop Vanags's views were infecting many young pastors, who, she said, were increasingly conservative.
She said, "In my opinion, Vanags is too young and inexperienced."
Ms. Fisere and the Archbishop were seminarians together at the Faculty of Theology at the University of Latvia in the mid-1980's, in the early days of perestroika, when the authorities gingerly began relaxing the strictures against religious activity but still punished those who pursued the new freedom too eagerly.
The Archbishop, who was a chemist, said he lost his job and apartment when he began working as a lay preacher. Ms. Fisere said she was accused of anti-Soviet agitation in the seminary and was almost kicked out. They both took part in the nonviolent revolution that led to Baltic independence in 1991. At Odds With West
The Archbishop is also at odds with his male counterparts in the Western branch of the Latvian church, who have been working alongside women pastors since 1970.
"We in the exile church have put quite a bit of pressure on the Archbishop over this," said Vilis Varsbergs, a Chicago-based church leader who in August will become dean of the theological department of the University of Latvia, which is where the Lutheran seminary is situated. "But it has been resented."
Archbishop Vanags's position on the ordination of women was known before he was elected by the Latvian Synod of Bishops, and most Western church leaders favored the candidacy of Archbishop Rozitis. But most Latvians, including even liberal church leaders, preferred a lifelong resident of Latvia. Many Women in Seminary
More than a third of the students in the Lutheran seminary in Riga are women, and no one is quite certain what will happen when the first women come up as candidates for ordination.
Some could stay in academia, teaching theology. Archbishop Rozitis said he would ordain Latvian women if they came to Germany with the intention of working outside Latvia, but he said he was not ready to defy Archbishop Vanags's authority and ordain women to return and work as pastors in Latvia.
"That would start off a very tense time between our churches," he said. "It is hard to do something, and just as hard to do nothing."
Archbishop Rozitis said there was another, more drastic step.
The World Lutheran Federation, the Lutheran umbrella group in Geneva, could vote to suspend the Latvian Church, in an echo of steps taken in 1984 against two white South African churches that refused to reject their nation's apartheid system. Federation 'Not Our Pope'
But even that prospect did not seem to shake Archbishop Vanags. "I hope they will not go that far," he said calmly. "But they cannot tell us what to do. The president of the World Lutheran Federation is not our pope."
Seated beneath a portrait of Martin Luther in his office in the church consistory, an elegantly renovated building that was used as a Soviet Army barracks during the Soviet occupation, the Archbishop explained his stance.
"It's not that I don't think women are just as capable as men -- they often get better marks than men in the theological faculty," he said. "But we have to follow what the Bible tells us, we can't impose our ideas of human rights or equal rights."
The Archbishop declined to cite specific passages in the Bible that prohibit the ordination of women. "If I cite a specific passage, others would react and say it can be interpreted differently. It would not be serious." Mr. Varsbergs argued that whatever biblical strictures could be found against women as members of the clergy were the word of men -- not God. "Prohibitions against women reflected the cultural situation in Greece at that time," he said. To the conservative argument that Jesus did not have female apostles, Mr. Varsbergs replied, "If you apply that standard, then gentiles shouldn't be ordained, either."
Calling the dispute "the most divisive issue in the history of our church," Archbishop Vanags called on the other side to give in. "If I were a woman and my wish to become a pastor was dividing the church," he said, "then I would give up this demand."
Photo: The Lutheran Archbishop of Latvia, Janis Vargas, has reversed his predecessor's stand and refuses to ordain women as pastors, dividing his denomination. Recently the Archbishop said although the church needed pastors, "it was better to do without them than to do something against the will of God." (Chuck Nacke for The New York Times) Map of shows the location of Riga, Latvia.
Correction: August 9, 1994, Tuesday An article last Wednesday about the refusal of the Lutheran Archbishop of Latvia to ordain women misstated the name of the church's world body. It is the Lutheran World Federation. A picture caption with the article misstated the Archbishop's name. It is Janis Vanags, not Vargas.

8 comments:
Whew! I thought I was the last crusty hold out.
The Remnant is bigger than you thought, eh, Isaiah?
+Diet O. Worms
How many female ministers does the WELS and ELS have now?
Get a sex change, and get over it.
Brett,
I guess it depends. Few, officially, but if you count "ministry planners" that throw around the phrase "administer the Means of Grace" loosely, then it's a bit larger.
And for the other comment lurkers out there, when your knee stops jerking, examine God's words in Timothy on the subject. "Suffer" and "usurp" are fairly stout verbs. I think maybe God knew what he was doing there.
+Diet O. Worms
The official WELS site lists ten female staff ministers, I believe. I am not sure if the female worship minister from St. Andrew's Latte Lutheran Church is listed or not. Likewise, Ski's pricey assistant. Remember, according to WELS Canon Law, it is acceptable for a woman to administer Holy Communion to another woman. That may also include those of us who are male lesbians and the trans-gendered.
While we have pastors frittering away time and money with C&C, Latvia goes wanting. Go for a win-win move. Ship the C&Cs to Latvia, or let them resign.
Here are two comments made to me from WELS ministers on the role of women in the church (these are taken from my contention that Pastor Schewe violated Scripture when he had all the women of HTLC read the liturgy as a group during the Divine Service). One sees this issue as a Biblical grey area and the other takes the Roman Catholic stance of principle and application of principle (classic statement and immediate retraction from this synodical official).
"Thirdly, 1 Cor. 14:34,35 and 1 Tim. 2:11,12 command that a woman is not to be teaching or instructing men with her sermon in formal worship. If you look closely at 1 Cor. 14, the context is that she should not “prophesy” with the result that her prophecy is “weighed” by the listeners (literally in Greek, “judged”). 1 Cor. 14 does not refer to an antiphonal reading, because we do not “judge” what God tells us like we “judge” a message that an individual is giving. It is talking about an individual’s preaching instruction. Certainly in a case where a woman is not up front reading (such as in an antiphonal form), these verses are not violated. You did include a “Q and A” on lectors from the synod website, and I’ll be honest with you, Brett, that lectors are an area that you correctly have indicated our synod needs to exercise great caution with. I certainly agree with you that we need to think carefully about this. The gist of the thinking is that since 1 Cor. 14 and 1 Tim. 2 exclude women from delivering their preaching instruction to men, some in our circles might want to use women as readers but not preachers. However, the difference I see between antiphonal singing/reading and functioning as a lector is that a woman is in a physical position (up front) that some might perceive as unsubmissive. If I were attending church with a woman functioning as a lector, I admit that I would be uncomfortable with that position. I can’t see myself ever making use of women lectors. At best, those who might like to make use of this practice are in a very gray area. At worst, it could be done in a wrong way (as the Q and A answer stated)." WELS Pastor Mark Schewe, Holy Trinity Lutheran Church.
"Second, to the specific issue of women in the church, remember that there are principles and there are applications of principles. The principles are always inviolate. Some applications of principles are always inviolate. Other applications of principles may vary depending upon a whole passel of factors, including but not limited to: strength or weakness of faith; cultural sensitivities; customs of the people, and church etc. (An example might be the way Luther dealt with the radicals at Wittenberg who wanted to take the Reformation too quickly. He backed off and moved slowly, allowing the word to do its work in people’s hearts before he instituted things like Communion in both kinds—certainly a biblical practice.) In asserting that Pastor Schewe was wrong to allow women to read sections of Scripture antiphonally, you want to be careful that you don’t turn the application of a principle into the principle itself. The principle that women are not to teach or have authority over a man is inviolate. Some applications of that principle, e.g., women pastors, women teaching men in Bible study, etc., are inviolate. However there is quite a stretch between women teaching (i.e., expounding, explaining, clarifying and elucidating Scripture) and reading Scripture antiphonally and collectively without giving instruction. (This doesn’t mean that Scripture itself is not instructive; that power to instruct inheres in the word. And, as you well know, the power and efficacy of the word to instruct is n ot made more or less effective whether it’s read by a woman or a man.) Another question that may well be raised is whether a practice is wrong (i.e. inherently sinful) or merely ill-advised under the circumstances. Since in this case in point you’re dealing with an application—not the principle itself—there are a number of criteria that are to be evaluated to ascertain the benefit or detriment of an application. Does it pander to or foster a particular false belief? Is it an accommodation to worldly practice and mindset? Is it edifying? And so forth." WELS AZ/CA District President Jon Buchholz
TIME FOR CONGREGATIONS TO LEAVE WELS???
Revelation 18:4
4Then I heard another voice from heaven say:
"Come out of her, my people,
so that you will not share in her sins,
so that you will not receive any of her plagues;
5for her sins are piled up to heaven,
and God has remembered her crimes.
6Give back to her as she has given;
pay her back double for what she has done.
Mix her a double portion from her own cup.
7Give her as much torture and grief
as the glory and luxury she gave herself.
Post a Comment