Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Justification Book, First Installment






Doctrine of the Word – Authority, Clarity, Efficacy

“Also they teach that men cannot be justified before God by their own strength, merits, or works, but are freely justified for Christ’s sake, through faith, when they believe that they are received into favor, and that their sins are forgiven for Christ’s sake, who, by His death, has made satisfaction for our sins. This faith God imputes for righteousness in His sight. Romans 3 and 4.”
Augsburg Confession, IV. #1. Of Justification. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 45. Tappert, p. 30. Heiser, p. 12f.


Thesis

            Luther’s birthday, November 10, 2009, should remind people that the Reformation began with the Biblical doctrine of justification by faith alone, apart from the works of the Law, not with the justification of Hottentots and Hindus – as imagined by the Pietists of the old Synodical Conference. Justification by faith is clearly taught in the Scriptures, Luther, the Book of Concord, the post-Concord Lutheran theologians, and the General Council. Forgiveness without faith has been covertly taught since the days of George Christian Knapp, whose influential Halle lectures were in print in German and English before the Stephanites landed in Perry County, Missouri. Knapp’s translator coined the double-justification terms owned by the Synodical Conference today:

From Knapp’s Lectures on Christian Theology, translated by Leonard Woods, Jr., New York, 1833. The LCMS was organized in 1847, the Stephan ships landing in 1839.

§ 113. UNIVERSALITY OF JUSTIFICATION. 817

It is universal as the atonement itself; vid. § 111, II. If the atonement extends to the whole human race, justification must also be universal; i. e. all must be able to obtain the actual forgiveness of their sins and blessedness, on account of the atonement of Christ. But in order to obviate mistakes, some points may require explanation. Justification, then, is universal,

(1) In respect to the persons to be pardoned.

All men, according to the Bible, may partake of this benefit. It was designed for all; vid. especially Rom. 3: 23. 5: 15 (§ 111),

318 ART. X. § 113. UNIVERSALITY OP JUSTIFICATION

in opposition to Jewish exclusiveness. It is bestowed however conditionally ; certain conditions are prescribed which are indispensable. Those who do not comply with these conditions, are excluded from the enjoyment of the benefit. Justification and forgiveness are not, therefore, universal in effect (actu); and this solely through the fault of men.*

Another conclusion from the universality of justification is, that every one may be sure of his forgiveness. This certainty, however, must not be founded upon inward/ee/ing-s, which are frequently deceptive ; but upon an actual compliance with the conditions on which God will forgive sins. If any one finds in himself the signs of true faith, of sincere love to God and Christ, of a renewed heart, and of a virtuous Christian disposition, he is justified. Rom. 8: 16, " The holy, Christian temper wrought in us by God, gives us the clearest and surest proof, that we are the children of God." 1 John 3: 7. 2 Pet. 1: 9, 10. This certainty is in the highest degree necessary to our tranquility and happiness. 1 Tim. 1: 16. ICor. 6: 11. 1 John 5: 18—20.

(2) In respect to sins and the punishment of sin.

(a) As to sins; the position that all sins, without exception, are forgiven for Christ's sake, is proved partly from the power and efficacy of the atonement of Christ, which is extended to all sins (vid. § 111, and the texts there cited) ; and partly from the texts which promise forgiveness of all sins, even the greatest and blackest, to those who comply with the prescribed conditions of pardon. Ezek. 18: 21, 22. Ps. 103: 3. 1 Cor. 6: 11. Ephes. 2: 5. 1 Tim. I: 15. The sin against the Holy Ghost cannot be regarded as an exception ; vid. § 84.

(6) As to the punishment of sin ; the answer to the question whether the pardoned are exempt from all the punishments of sin, whether therefore justification is plena et perfecta, may be learned from § 111, II. The natural and physical evils which result from past sins, indeed, remain ; but they are mitigated and rendered more tolerable, and are divested of the terror of punishment….

* [Translator - This is very conveniently expressed by the terms objective and subjective justification. Objective justification is the act of God, by which he proffers pardon to all through Christ; subjective, is the act of man, by which he accepts the pardon freely offered in the Gospel. The former is universal, the latter not.]

Readers will notice that the translator’s summary of Knapp’s theology is the classic double-justification scheme of the Synodical Conference, in print before the Stephanite expedition landed in New Orleans. This almost-forgotten Halle Pietist was not even an orthodox Trinitarian, but a skeptic whose writing enthused an early Unitarian author, the grandfather of poet T. S. Eliot and co-founder of Washington University in St. Louis, where Herman Otten earned a degree:

To this effect I will quote the authority of George Christian Knapp an eminent Trinitarian writer, whose " Lectures on Christian Theology," as translated by Leonard Woods, Jr., are a standard work with Trinitarian believers. After a full and learned discussion of the whole subject, he distinctly admits that it is " impossible to prove the agreement of the earliest Christian writers with the common Orthodox doctrine as established in the fourth century." Vol. I. pp. 294, 299, &c. William G. Eliot, Discourses on the Doctrines of Christianity, Boston, American Unitarian Society, 1875, p. 95.

I will argue that the Synodical Conference gradually absorbed and disseminated Universal Objective Justification (UOJ), in spite of occasional objections and refutations of this strange, dangerous and borrowed opinion. In a bizarre twist, the Synodical Conference took over the double-justification scheme of Knapp’s English translation and made Objective Justification their golden calf. The Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, and Evangelical Lutheran Synod have endorsed and promoted this alien and anti-Christian UOJ concept—derived from Enthusiasm—
with the expected results. From the beehive of Enthusiasm the Synodical Conference has gathered a bumper crop of Enthusiastic honey: Pentecostalism, Church Growthism, unionism, women’s ordination, and Entertainment Evangelism.

Lutheran Reformation, Justification by Faith

            In contrast, the Reformation taught the Biblical doctrine of justification by faith, clearly and consistently. UOJ Enthusiasts often quote this statement before they launch their attack on the justification by faith:

"This article concerning justification by faith (as the Apology says) is the chief article in the entire Christian doctrine, without which no poor conscience can have any firm consolation, or can truly know the riches of the grace of Christ, as Dr. Luther also has written: If this only article remains pure on the battlefield, the Christian Church also remains pure, and in goodly harmony and without any sects; but if it does not remain pure, it is not possible that any error or fanatical spirit can be resisted. (Tom. 5, Jena, p. 159.) And concerning this article especially Paul says that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump."
Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III. #6, Righteousness of Faith before God, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 917. Tappert, p. 540. Heiser, p. 250. The Apology statement cited is found here – Apology IV, #1, Concordia Triglotta, p. 121; Tappert, p. 107; Heiser, p. 32.

And yet, these UOJ Enthusiasts never find this concise and significant confession:

"Now we will show that faith [and nothing else]  justifies."
Apology of the Augsburg Confession, IV. #69. Of Justification. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 141. Tappert, p. 116. Heiser, p. 37.

            The Book of Concord often refers to the Gospel as the treasure of the Scriptures. Melanchthon, Luther, and the Concordists agree in their use of this term and its application to justification by faith. Blind guides of doctrine do not see this or teach it, but overlook, overturn, and hide what they cannot comprehend:

"For neither you nor I could ever know anything of Christ, or believe on Him, and obtain Him for our Lord, unless it were offered to us and granted to our hearts by the Holy Ghost through the preaching of the Gospel. The work is done and accomplished; for Christ has acquired and gained the treasure for us by His suffering, death, resurrection, etc. But if the work remained concealed so that no one knew of it, then it would be in vain and lost. That this treasure, therefore, might not lie buried, but be appropriated and enjoyed, God has caused the Word to go forth and be proclaimed, in which He gives the Holy Ghost to bring this treasure home and appropriate it to us. Therefore sanctifying is nothing else than bringing us to Christ to receive this good, to which we could not attain ourselves."
            The Large Catechism, The Creed, Article III, #38, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 689. Tappert, p. 415. Heiser, p. 194.

"It is a faithful saying that Christ has accomplished everything, has removed sin and overcome every enemy, so that through Him we are lords over all things. But the treasure lies yet in one pile; it is not yet distributed nor invested. Consequently, if we are to possess it, the Holy Spirit must come and teach our hearts to believe and say: I, too, am one of those who are to have this treasure. When we feel that God has thus helped us and given the treasure to us, everything goes well, and it cannot be otherwise than that man's heart rejoices in God and lifts itself up, saying: Dear Father, if it is Thy will to show toward me such great love and faithfulness, which I cannot fully fathom, then will I also love Thee with all my heart and be joyful, and cheerfully do what pleases Thee. Thus, the heart does not now look at God with evil eyes, does not imagine He will cast us into hell, as it did before the Holy Spirit came...."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 279. Pentecost Sunday. John 14:23-31.

"Faith is that my whole heart takes to itself this treasure. It is not my doing, not my presenting or giving, not my work or preparation, but that a heart comforts itself, and is perfectly confident with respect to this, namely, that God makes a present and gift to us, and not we to Him, that He sheds upon us every treasure of grace in Christ."
Apology of the Augsburg Confession, IV. #48. Of Justification. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 135. Heiser, p. 36.

"These treasures are offered us by the Holy Ghost in the promise of the holy Gospel; and faith alone is the only means by which we lay hold upon, accept, and apply, and appropriate them to ourselves. This faith is a gift of God, by which we truly learn to know Christ, our Redeemer, in the Word of the Gospel, and trust in Him, that for the sake of His obedience alone we have the forgiveness of sins by grace, are regarded as godly and righteous by God the Father, and are eternally saved."
Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III. #10. Of the Righteousness of Faith before God. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 919. Tappert, p. 541. Heiser, p. 250.



           

7 comments:

Brett Meyer said...

Pastor Jackson, I'm very happy to see this book taking shape. Defending and proclaiming the central doctrine of the true Christian Church is critical to any reform desired in the Lutheran Synods or any worthwhile endeavor on earth.

Constructive comments: The draft of Chapter A as presented seem more in line with the subject matter of Chapters D and H and not specifically to the authority, clarity and efficacy of the Word which I think is a great way to start this book. A Biblical and Confessional statement of what the Word is and does supremely and alone will be the foundation for casting the rational false doctrines of the UOJists in their proper light (or lack of).

I would also suggest a chapter on UOJ's war against faith. For UOJ to succeed it must pervert what Scripture reveals about the Holy Spirit's faith. UOJists deceive by calling this justification Objective and that one Subjective with a rational flair but they cannot squirm around their treatment of faith.

In Christ,
Brett Meyer

Anonymous said...

After reading this blog, you really expect anyone to take you seriously? Really????

L P said...

Pr Greg.

Good that you are writing this book. Maier was right, there is so much semantic confusion that has arisen due to the introduction of the term objective/subjective.

I agree with Brett regarding the idea of faith on those who buy into UOJ formulation.

It seems they are allergic to faith, the moment you mention it, they get a high blood pressure as if faith is something that we contribute to justification. They always come up with this opposition. Yet, it is Jesus who is the author and finisher of faith.

LPC

L P said...

Pr. GJ,

BTW, this has been posted as a pro OJ quote from Luther

...Paul says in Rom. 8[:2], "For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set me free from the law of sin and death." Why does he not say that, "It has set me free from sin and death"? Has not Christ set us free from sin and death once and for all? Paul, however, is speaking of the proper operation of the law of the Spirit, which does what Christ has merited. Indeed, Christ once and for all absolved and freed everyone from sin and death when He merited for us the law of the Spirit of the Life. But what did that Spirit of Life do? He has not yet freed us from death and sin, for we still must die, we still must labor under sin; but in the end He will free us. Yet He has already liberated us from the law of sin and death, that is, from the kingdom and tyranny of sin and death. Sin is indeed present, but having lost its tyrannic power, it can do nothing; death indeed impends, but having lost its sting, it can neither harm nor terrify. — Martin Luther (Against Latomus, Luther's Works, Vol. 32, p. 207) (emphasis added)

I have no Luther materials so I cannot check the full context of this quote.

LPC

Anonymous said...

Pietism was, historically, a movement inside Lutheranism that emphasized the subjective over the objective. It also was exclusive, not inclusive, as small cells of "super Christians" were supposed to leaven the entire congregation and bring them up to a higher level of sanctification.

You make a big deal out of Knapp being a Pietist, and tying that in with the development of UOJ. But the Pietists certainly were not universalists; on the contrary, they were more likely to be suspect -- even of the people gathered in church -- as to whether or not a person was truly a Christian. And they certainly sought visible confirmation of the inner workings of the Spirit in a person's heart.

Now, if you want to argue that UOJ was more a product that grew up in the context of the great mission century -- that I could buy.

Anonymous said...

Pastor GJ or Brett, can you explain this example of justification that a WELS pastor has used many times:
"The supermarket is giving away free turkeys for everyone. However, you have to go to(drive or walk) the supermarket to receive the turkey".
I know that their are others in the WELS that understand this as the proper teaching. Correct me if I am wrong, but I read Luthers works all the time and I just do not see how the example is fully orthodox.

In Christ,
from WELS chuch lady

Anonymous said...

All right! I'm no Gregory Jackson or Brett Myers, just a woman who needs to be silent. Asking is not the same as usurping. The Apology of the Augsburg Confession, IV #4 of Justification Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis CPH 1921 appears to be saying that God makes a present and gift to us, and not we to him, that he sheds upon us every treasure of grace in Christ.
So the question is,"Why would I, or anyone, go to the "supermarket" if the owner drives to my home to present me with the treasurable "turkey"?
One more thing, Prof. Jackson, your book is long over-due. You keep telling it like it is!

Thanks again,
In Christ,
from WELS church lady