Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Ichabods Going To Training Event - But Not the Pietistic Gathering at Mequon




Some have wondered about the alleged Texas Church and Change confab. I alerted my sources but no one could confirm a meeting at Patterson's church. One person theorized that having a secret meeting published on Ichabod was a good way to get it canceled.

The story may have been a mistake or planted to mislead. No matter - the Pietists will gather at Mequon in a few days. The liberal WELS leaders are especially dense in the Milwaukee area, so they can prey and pray at the same time.

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Maintaining the Momentum":

I thought WELS already taught people to pray. Why does it need a separate prayer institute? Is it a form of advanced placement before God?



Church and Change will be in charge of games at the
WELS Prayer Institute meeting.
I feel the buzz already.


Meanwhile, my wife and I will be going to a training event in LA (free) and stop at the Nixon Library on the way. I gave up on journalism school earlier this year. I figured I was already a journalist, and I did not relish grading even more paper.

One of my business connections asked me about going active in life insurance again. I did a little in 2007-8, but teaching got so busy I dropped it. Besides, the time requirements did not mesh with online teaching at all. I had to drive various places in Arizona, very scenic but also expensive.

Oddly enough, the new version of life insurance is how I bought my last policy. I asked for a quote and ended up getting coverage for half the price of the policy I owned at that time - Northwestern Mutual.

So I currently work in eight states, mostly in the East, using the phone and the computer. Many people get their coverage without any paperwork at all, since insurance companies are catching up with the new technology.

I was the general agency's annuity expert before, so I plan to do that again. Retired people are leery about the stability of variable funds. I am glad many have seen the numbers go up again.

My plan is to create more freedom for writing. If I can help people work part-time or full-time from their homes, that will be a bonus. Many ministers are going to become tent-makers because of the flat economy and the disastrous leadership in Washington DC.


Sacred Music from the Most Villainous Lutheran





This beautiful song is based off of Isaiah 45:8.

Rorate, cæli, desuper,
et nubes pluant justum ;
aperiatur terra, et germinet Salvatorem,
et justitia oriatur simul :
ego Dominus creavi eum.

Biblia Sacra juxta Vulgatam Clementinam. 2005 (Ed. electronica) (Is 45:8). Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.

Copied shamelessly from Sceleratissimus Lutheranus

Sceleratissimus Lutheranus - The Most Villainous Lutheran. The title given to the great Lutheran theologian, Martin Chemnitz, by the Roman Catholics after he wrote his masterful work, The Examination of the Council of Trent.


Jesus Priceless Treasure



J. S. Bach wrote the harmony to this hymn. No picture is available for Johann Franck.


A WELS pastor wrote -

Greg:

I was reading tonight in your book, Jesus, Priceless Treasure, and I came upon the observation you made on the parable of the sower and the seed. In chapter 11, p. 79, you note, “It is not unusual for dozens of faithful Christians to have descended from a Christian marriage 50 years before.”

Yesterday my family and I worshiped with my in-laws in church in our home state, as they celebrated their 50th wedding anniversary. Their request was that all their children and grandchildren be with them in worship—and all were. All continue to worship and be served regularly with the Means of Grace in their various congregations. It was a poignant example of the illustration you used in your book.

Ironically, the Hymn of the Day for the worship service yesterday was . . . “Jesus, Priceless Treasure.” (“Jesu, Meine Freude” has been far and away my favorite hymn in the hymnal since college days.)

I thought you might enjoy hearing of the connection.


***

GJ - I did.

"Jesus, Priceless Treasure"
By Johann Franck, 1618-1677

1. Jesus, priceless Treasure,
Fount of purest pleasure,
Truest Friend to me.
Ah, how long in anguish
Shall my spirit languish,
Yearning, Lord, for Thee?
Thou art mine, O Lamb divine!
I will suffer naught to hide Thee,
Naught I ask beside Thee.

2. In Thine arms I rest me;
Foes who would molest me
Cannot reach me here.
Though the earth be shaking,
Every heart be quaking,
Jesus calms my fear.
Lightnings flash And thunders crash;
Yet, though sin and hell assail me,
Jesus will not fail me.

3. Satan, I defy thee;
Death, I now decry thee;
Fear, I bid thee cease.
World, thou shalt not harm me
Nor thy threats alarm me
While I sing of peace.
God's great power Guards every hour;
Earth and all its depths adore Him,
Silent bow before Him.

4. Hence, all earthly treasure!
Jesus is my Pleasure,
Jesus is my Choice.
Hence, all empty glory!
Naught to me thy story
Told with tempting voice.
Pain or loss, Or shame or cross,
Shall not from my Savior move me
Since He deigns to love me.

5. Evil world, I leave thee;
Thou canst not deceive me,
Thine appeal is vain.
Sin that once did blind me,
Get thee far behind me,
Come not forth again.
Past thy hour, O pride and power;
Sinful life, thy bonds I sever,
Leave thee now forever.

6. Hence, all fear and sadness!
For the Lord of gladness,
Jesus, enters in.
Those who love the Father,
Though the storms may gather,
Still have peace within.
Yea, whate'er I here must bear,
Thou art still my purest Pleasure,
Jesus, priceless Treasure!

Hymn #347
The Lutheran Hymnal
Text: Matt. 13: 46
Author: Johann Franck, 1655
Translated by: composite
Titled: "Jesu, meine Freude"
Composer: Johann Crueger, 1649
Tune: "Jesu, meine Freude"


Maintaining the Momentum




Alert - The Chicanery reaction has already set in. Their November theme is Regaining the Lost Momentum. WELS members and pastors will have to continue to press the Doctrinal Pussycats to address the doctrinal errors and money-grabbing tactics of these insubordinate fakes.


From the WELS Prayer Institute

The Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS) is a Confessional Lutheran Church body begun in 1850 in Milwaukee , Wisconsin . The WELS has approximately 1,259 congregations with a total membership of 400,622 souls. See www.wels.net for details on the Synod and its various ministries. The WELS PRAYER INSTITUTE (WPI) is not an official organization of the WELS . WPI was introduced in November 2004 as another ministry “spun off” from Church and Change, an informal gathering of WELS pastors, teachers, staff ministers and lay leaders. “Church” refers to the one gospel ministry of Jesus Christ which he has entrusted to all of his people. The word “Change” refers to how we might proclaim the changeless gospel of Christ within the changing culture in which we live.





First - note that WELS got Church and Change started with a WELS grant, followed by the Chicaneries spinning off the WELS Prayer Insitute.
Second - note the slogan - the changless gospel in a changing culture - which can be found on all the websites of Chicanery congregations.
Third - contact information includes "Pastor Steve Witte: Phone# 920-499-7405, email pastorwitte0906@sbcglobal.net" who got a DMin from Gordon Conwell's unionistic seminary. He has recently accepted a call to the Asian mission board of WELS, just in case you think the Church Growth Movement has been killed. Witte was a founder of Church and Chicanery and remains a leader of that lobbying and grant-grabbing group.

WELS Prayer Conference

August 14, 15, 2009

at Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary

Friday Night Prayer Time: 7:30 to 8:30 pm

Saturday Registration: 8:30 -- 9:00 am

Saturday Conference: 9:00 am to 3:00 pm

Bruce Becker: Keynote Speaker [also at the C and C Conference in November)

Cost: $45 per person (includes lunch, materials, donation to support prayer ministry)



Bruce Becker is not going to stop leading Church and Chicaneries. He went from his overpaid position as head of Perish Services to Mark Jeske's Lutheran Time of Grace.



Dog Refuses Treat




If Everything Is Adiaphora, Then This New Blog Is Bad




Bad Vestments is a blog devoted to inappropriate costumes worn while leading worship. I immediately thought of the beach mass photo above, which I found somewhere. I believe it is Anglican. The costumes are set off by a surf board resting on a plastic-covered garbage can - the altar.

According to Safari Leader Timmerman, from Don Patterson's church, almost everything in worship is adiaphora, so people can do whatever they want.

I can imagine the Chicaneries vying for the honor of appearing on The Bad Vestments blog. There might be theme awards given, too:


  1. Most outrageous set design (airport at The CORE, Ski).
  2. Worst coffee brew served during worship (Latte Lutheran Church, Randy Hunter).
  3. Most distracting movie screen.
  4. Best effort at hiding the sacraments.
  5. Loudest snacks served during the service.

Monday, August 10, 2009

Top Hymns




Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The Little Sect on the Prairie Is All About Doctri...":

Pr. Jackson,

This question has little to do with previous posts. Knowing that you are a true lover of Lutheran hymnody, I have a question for you: What are your top ten favorite hymns of all time? The primary list would, of course, be based on text. If at all possible, perhaps a second list based on tune or an aesthetic / personal choice could be made? I thank you for your time. I am a WELS teacher looking for a new set of hymns for my students to study this school year - and I would like your opinion.

***

GJ - This is tempting and dangerous at the same time. I will start with great texts. As much as I love Luther's hymns, Gerhardt's are even better when viewed as doctrinal, inspirational essays.

TLH 142 - A Lamb Goes Uncomplaining Forth - Gerhardt
TLH 528 - If God Himself Be For Me - Gerhardt
TLH 192 - Awake, My Heart, With Gladness - Gerhardt
TLH 85 - From Heaven Above - Luther
TLH 287 - That Man a Godly Life Might Live - Luther
TLH 260 - O Lord, Look Down from Heaven - Luther (to Nun freut euch)
TLH 292 - Lord Jesus Christ, With Us Abide - Selnecker
TLH 656 - Behold a Host, Arrayed in White - Brorson
TLH 305 - Soul Adorn Thyself - Johann Franck
TLH 347 - Jesus, Priceless Treasure - Johann Franck

Hymns I love to sing - with especially good melodies:
TLH 657 - Beautiful Savior - Author Unknown
TLH 479 - Zion Rise - Johann Schmidt
TLH 429 - Lord, Thee I Love - Martin Schalling (Selnecker's friend)
TLH 458 - Our Father, Thou in Heaven Above - Luther
TLH 331 - Yea, As I Live - Nikolaus Hermam (to Old Hundredth)
TLH 207 - Like the Golden Sun Ascending - Thomas Kingo
TLH 259 - Flung to the Heedless Winds - Luther's first hymn
TLH 40 - The God of Abraham Praise - Thomas Olivers
TLH 44 - Ye Lands to the Lord - Ulrik Koren
Children of the Heavenly Father - Carolina Sandell

Children of the heav’nly Father
Safely in His bosom gather;
Nestling bird nor star in Heaven
Such a refuge e’er was given.

God His own doth tend and nourish;
In His holy courts they flourish;
From all evil things He spares them;
In His mighty arms He bears them.

Neither life nor death shall ever
From the Lord His children sever;
Unto them His grace He showeth,
And their sorrows all He knoweth.

Though He giveth or He taketh,
God His children ne’er forsaketh;
His the loving purpose solely
To preserve them pure and holy.

Lo, their very hairs He numbers,
And no daily care encumbers
Them that share His ev’ry blessing
And His help in woes distressing.

Praise the Lord in joyful numbers:
Your Protector never slumbers.
At the will of your Defender
Ev’ry foeman must surrender.

***

I hope this helps. Teaching great hymns to children is a great service to the Kingdom of God. Everyone is blessed by your work.

Note all the hymn videos linked on the left column, including one of my all-time favorites, which I cannot find in English - Gerhardt's "Lobet den Herren."


UOJ Survey



Portrait of the Theologian as a Young Doughnut Maker


DK has left a new comment on your post "The Little Sect on the Prairie Is All About Doctri...":

Hi Professor Jackson

I have a UOJ question for you. I’ve talked with several WELS and LCMS pastors about UOJ. Out of 6 or 8 pastors, 1 from each synod has responded in what I would call ‘very favorable’. (each has told me they are going to read Thy Strong Word).

The rest of the pastors kindly, but very definitely blew me off. “Of course Christ Objectively Justified the whole world!”, went the general theme. The more questions I ask the more vague the response until the wind of conversation dies out, replaced by awkward silence…(crickets chirping…) The agony of it makes me ask a benign question, one I know will warm the marrow quickly. “Are you going to watch the Packers this afternoon?”

Even though I think that Pastors ought to be engaging me in this conversation (instead of the other way around) I really do get the distinct impression that the guys I talked to, at least, believe that Faith Alone justifies; It’s almost as if the words they use are jumbled, confusing and misleading but their belief is alright. Using the word ‘reconciliation’ as a direct synonym for ‘justification’ is a pretty big error, but look at our times!

We’re experiencing one of the biggest butcheries of English in the history of the language. The poor uneducated Confederate soldier had a bigger vocabulary and better usage and grammar (I’ve read countless letters) than any collection of M.DIVs from any synod. This degredation(sic) of English is particularly bad in the WELS—there(sic) fetish for misspelling words only scratches the surface.

So my question for you is this: In your opinion, what percent of UOJ defenders actually don’t believe the substance(sic) of that doctrine? How many of them are unaware that the Equivication(sic) changes what they are saying? And how many WELS pastors, considering the WELS MO is K.I.S.S., ever actually talk about UOJ? And as far as that goes, how many of them even think about UOJ? I’m just wondering if you think that UOJ is having a negative threat on the Whole WELS or only on the movers and shakers, who in turn affect the whole WELS?

Sorry, maybe this is a dumb question… Oh but good news! I purposefully misspelled words for affect (and effect) and added (sic) for you so you didn’t have to. Cheers!

***

GJ - I have always appreciated doctrinal questions. WELS/LCMS laity got me interested in the issue, and some badly brain-washed UOJ-CGM laity raved at me for being influenced by laity. (Self-loathing laity?)

By now most pastors know that UOJ is the Third Rail of the Synodical Conference - touch it and you die. The Cascione junkyard dogs rant, rave, and lie through their fangs about it. The CG leadership of all three synods adore UOJ, so pastors interested in keeping their calls would rather avoid the issue.

WELS pastors have avoided doctrinal issues for several decades and have grown anemic and lethargic in their discernment. Missouri and the Little Sect are no different.

My experience is that many pastors trained in UOJ cling to the words but do not believe the heresy. A certain percentage of those pastors think OJ is the Atonement, so they may say the UOJ words while expressing the Biblical concept of justification by faith. Other pastors do not accept UOJ because they realize it is utter hogwash. Some are more frank with me, and some will argue the issue when given the chance.

I think SP Schroeder gave the entire synod permission to study doctrine again. There will be conflict, but that is not all bad. "There must be heresies and divisions among you to prove what is acceptable." Suppressing doctrinal discussions is foundational for apostasy.

The more I studied UOJ, the more I saw it as an expression of the Enthusiasm which gushed forth from the Pietistic founders of the Synodical Conference. When they were not praising themselves for being so orthodox, they were busy creating a hybrid of Pietism and Lutheran Orthodoxy. Now they are shocked that their husbandry has created a sterile mule? They should have spent more time on a farm growing up.

Perhaps this anecdote will illustrate what is going on about UOJ. I was at an independent conference when someone gave an incoherent presentation. Archbishop-to-be Jim Heiser was there and said, "He denied OJ!" I am not sure what the presenter said, although he was clearly against baptismal regeneration. Later, when Heiser read the justification chapter of Thy Strong Word, he was appalled at what UOJ really meant. Like me, he took the term to be a synonym for the Atonement. Heiser told me that another pastor read that chapter and was also shocked. Both of them were at The Surrendered Fort while Robert Preus was president.

When Fake Ichabod made its brief, odoriferous debut, the authors refused to link the chapter while maladroitly presenting their favorite heresy, which is wedded to Church Growth. People need to read copious quotations from both sides, not the repeat-after-me nonsense of Enthusiasm. What are the pastors afraid of - the truth?

The UOJ Stormtroopers are afraid these issues will come out in the open as they discuss the Book of Concord. The laity and a few brave pastors will have to pursue the Biblical concept of the Means of Grace as it applies to UOJ.

One thing leads to another. As I wrote before, laity got me involved in the UOJ issue. I spent as much time as I could gathering UOJ materials. Now others are opening up new understanding about its origin - including original research about the Pietist Knapp. Copying false doctrine did not begin with Paul Calvin Kelm.


The Little Sect on the Prairie Is All About Doctrine - And Teaching the Truth



Pope John the Malefactor has visited more countries and extended
the Left Foot of Fellowship more often than his Roman counterpart,
given the size of the Little Sect.


The August newsletter of the ELS managed to cover the WELS convention without mentioning the repudiation of Church Growth doctrine.

Pope John the Malefactor would have problems with the content of the papers given, except for John Brenner's fantasies about UOJ.

The one thing the Synodical Conference keeps harping on is an opinion not found in the Book of Concord, Luther, Chemnitz, Melanchthon, Gerhard, or Calov - UOJ or double justification.

But double justification is found in Burk (Pietist) and Knapp (Pietist), transported by Walther (Pietist), and canonized by F. Pieper - who was born into a Pietistic, unionistic sect and subsequently had his membership upgraded to Missouri Synod.

A brief catechism on Universal Objective Justification:

The whole world is forgiven and everyone is saved. Every single person is a guilt-free saint. Therefore we are born without sin, like Mary Immaculata. That is Universal Objective Justification. However, all this forgiveness and salvation and grace do not mean anything until we make a decision and accept that it is true (subjective justification). If we hem and haw, we are damned forever and will probably be the only ones in Hell who are not guilt-free saints. This eternal doctrine can be traced all the way back to the first days of the Christian Church in Perry County, Missouri.


The Shrinkers love UOJ, harping on it even more than the seminary professors.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The Little Sect on the Prairie Is All About Doctri...":

It's kind of hard to believe that anything at all will be done about CGM in the ELS. The number of pastors for CGM may be few, but they're folks who get their way. Nothing will be done about Abiding Shepherd.


Thy Strong Word - Sells Used for $65!


Used books sell for deeply discounted prices at Alibris.

I never dealt with them before, but an alleged friend bought Reu's Luther and the Scriptures out from under my nose for only $5. I always wanted that book but was not aware of the vast used market out there when I first got the itch.

This friend got his copy for $5 and gave me the link for a $9 purchase of the same book. Some people think Ichabodians are not considerate, selfless, generous. What more could I ask?

I thought that was pretty funny, so I looked up my name as an author. The prices were what I expected, except for Thy Strong Word, which is offered for more than the original price of $40. I have been shipping it to people for $10 per copy - new. As I explained to one reader, there is not much money in writing so I would rather distribute copies than earn a little more.

Later I will do an English-only version of TSW and produce a free PDF for people to download, through Lulu.

---

Bruce Church has left a new comment on your post "Thy Strong Word - Sells Used for $65!":

Reu's bio (The Lutherans By L. DeAne Lagerquist, p. 218) says he argued against inerrancy of Scripture, so it's odd that you want Reu's book entitled "Luther and the Scriptures," though I haven't read it, nor do I own it:

http://books.google.com/books?id=kli5nRmGzm4C&pg=PA218&dq=luther+and+the+scriptures+reu&ei=yT2ASviIHIzIMd6smOEK#v=onepage&q=&f=false

***

GJ - That's why I have a PhD instead of a drive-by DMin. The Shrinkers all have unionistic, drive-by DMins, because a real doctorate is too much work for them. However, they all call themselves "Dr."

Back to the main subject. Yes, Reu did argue against inerrancy at first. He was a true scholar, stunning Germany by coming from America and becoming an expert on German catechisms. His studies led him to conclude Luther did teach inerrancy. Reu became increasingly orthodox, and that really miffed the liberal element in the ALC/LCA wing of Lutherdom. They never forgave him for backsliding into inerrancy. A parallel example is Robert Preus, who abandoned UOJ and clearly taught against it in his last book, Justification and Rome.

Reu could look at a page of German and write it down from memory. Think what he could have done for Paul Calvin Kelm and John Xerox Parlow!

I read about Reu in one of the two Fuerbringer books, which are invaluable for Lutheran history in America. Both books are small volumes full of eye-witness anecdotes about the leading figures of various synods. Ludwig's idiot son Fibby was the man who led Concordia St. Louis into apostasy.


Knock, Knock



Rahm Emanuel, White House Chief of Staff, Hillary Clinton Ally


"Knock, knock."
"Who's there?"
"Kenya."
"Kenya who?"
"Kenya show me your birth certificate?"
"Not funny, Rahm."

[Found on the Internet]

WELS Shrinkers in Fellowship with Islam via Warren and Stetzer



WELS Church and Chicaneries invited Stetzer to teach the Wisconsin Synod the Word of God.
Here is Stetzer consulting with Rick Warren, on his extreme Left.



Rick Warren asks Muslims for help


Published July 30, 2009



WASHINGTON (BP)—In a controversial address to the nation’s largest Muslim organization, Rick Warren asked for their cooperation in addressing some of the world’s problems that governments haven’t been able to solve.

Warren, pastor of Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, Calif., told about 8,000 Muslims at the Islamic Society of North America’s annual convention in Washington July 4 that he was “deeply humbled” and applauded their courage for inviting an evangelical pastor.

“I come to you today with a spirit of love and a spirit of friendship and a spirit of deep respect. I love my dear, dear Muslim friends, my next door neighbor and so many that are friends, and I love you,” Warren said.

During his 20-minute address, Warren set forth four specific ways Muslims and Christians can work together, “maintaining our separate traditions, maintaining our convictions without compromise,” for the world’s greater good.

“As the two largest faiths on this planet—Muslims and Christians—we must lead in this. We must lead,” Warren said. “With over 1 billion Muslims and over 2 billion Christians, together as half the world we have to do something about modeling what it means to live in peace, to live in harmony.”

First, Warren called on Muslims and Christians to demonstrate what it means to respect the dignity of every person.

“Tolerance is not enough. People don’t want to be tolerated. They want to be respected. They want to be treated with dignity. They want to be listened to. They want to be valued,” he said.

Toward that end, Warren proposed a coalition to end stereotyping.

“Since today much of the press is actually clueless as to what you believe and as to what I believe, there are frequent mischaracterizations in the media, frequent ignorant generalizations—generalizations are generally wrong—and frequent stereotyping of all of us. And, friends, it needs to be challenged,” Warren said.

A second area where Muslims and Christians should work together, Warren said, is restoring the civil public square where people of all beliefs can debate and even disagree without demeaning each other.

“The right to believe anything does not mean everything is right,” he said. “But you can, as I said, disagree without being disagreeable.”

Warren cited as a third goal of Muslims and Christians working together to promote peace and protect freedom, particularly the freedoms of speech and religion.

“History has proven over and over again that freedom is eventually lost to either license or political correctness or the fear for security. And so we have to work at protecting the freedoms,” Warren said, adding that Muslims who have been in America for many generations have a responsibility to teach the newcomers what it means to be American.

Fourth, Muslims and Christians can work together toward tackling what Warren called five global giants: conflict, corruption, poverty, disease and illiteracy.

“There are 600,000 Buddhists in the world, there are 800,000 Hindus in the world, there are over a billion Muslims, a couple billion Christians,” he said. “Most of the world has some kind of faith, and if you say only secularists can do humanitarian care, you’ve ruled out most of the world.”

Warren gave as an example his church’s work with Muslims in Rwanda toward improving the African nation’s poor health care system, suggesting that the success could be duplicated elsewhere.

“Friends, this is the time for action, this is the time for civility, this is the time for respecting each other. It’s the time for the common good, that we work together because some problems are so big you have to team tackle them,” Warren said.

Before and after Warren spoke at the Muslim convention, observers voiced views supporting and criticizing his decision. The Associated Press said that, given Warren’s standing as “one of the most prominent religious leaders in the country,” his willingness to speak was “a sign of growing acceptance of U.S. Muslims.”

AP also noted that it was not the first time Warren had addressed an American Muslim group. Last December he spoke at a meeting of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, a policy organization based in Los Angeles.

“But the Islamic Society gathering is by far his most dramatic display of friendship with U.S. Muslims,” AP said.

Mike Edens, a professor of theology and Islamic studies at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, told Baptist Press Warren was acting in line with a document he had signed previously advocating Muslim-Christian
interaction.

The full-page letter endorsed by Warren and nearly 300 other Christian leaders appeared in The New York Times in December 2007. It was drafted by scholars at Yale Divinity School’s Center for Faith and Culture and said conversation should take place between Christians and Muslims centered on the “common ground” the two religions share.

“Warren speaks as a disciple of Jesus Christ explains the meaning of Jesus’ command to love our neighbors,” Edens said in a statement to BP. “In his view, biblical love is active, attacking stereotypes, respecting diversity and living with civility with neighbors.

“Freedom of thought and religion is granted lovingly for neighbors. This freedom includes persuasive witness, without coercion between neighbors,” Edens continued. “For Warren, this definition of neighborly love is the beginning of establishing the common good for all humanity.

“The hard part of this speech is the application: working together for the common good and conducting personal witness to salvation in Jesus Christ within the context of that work,” Edens said.

Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum, a think tank focusing on issues in the Middle East, questioned Warren’s choice to speak to the Islamic Society of North America in particular.

“The constructive substance of Warren’s talk—the calls to dignity, civility, freedom and to constructive action—was severely outbalanced by his addressing these words to an Islamist organization that shares few of his goals—hat is in fact antagonistic to them,” Pipes told BP.

“ISNA works to apply the Shari’a, or Islamic law, a medieval code that denies dignity, civility and freedom to non-Muslims. Worse, the Department of Justice in 2007 named ISNA as an unindicted co-conspirator in the crime of financing a foreign terrorist group,” Pipes said. “Warren should atone for this mistake by apologizing and finding moderate Muslims to endorse and work with.”

In a July 10 blog entry at danielpipes.org, Pipes quoted a report by the Investigative Project on Terrorism which said the conference also “featured speakers spewing raw anti-Semitism, homophobic rhetoric and defense of the terrorist group Hezbollah.”

Edens, in his comments to Baptist Press, said, “While it is clear that ISNA has been a channel for funds to Hamas, the fact remains that the members of the ISNA are our American neighbors in need of a Christian witness. Secondly, although those members have always had a choice between involvement with groups like Hamas and groups which seek the common good, with Pastor Warren’s address that choice becomes stark. As Muslim Americans disavow Hamas and choose to embrace the common good, freedom and peace will advance. Giving Muslims a choice to join in such a pursuit benefits all humanity.”

***

GJ - A reader noted - "This is a good example of where Pietism leads."

Pietism is unionistic and anti-confessional, so the movement inevitably leads to apostasy and political activism.

The Pietists--who "took the pledge" against alcohol 50 years ago--are marching for radical causes today.

Rick Warren should Google such terms as "honor killings" and "FGM."

Last year, VP Don Patterson took a bunch of WELS workers to hear Stetzer at the pan-denominational--Pietistic--Exponential Conference. Soon after, Stetzer was booked to speak at the November, 2009 conference, as indicated by his Twitter, blog, and official speaking calendar. Calling Stetzer a liar, the Chicaneries denied this. Oh wait, maybe they were saying, "Do you believe us or your lying eyes?" The Conference of Pussycats finally had claws for concern and ordered a disinvitation. The invitation that never happened was withdrawn and the Stetzer calendar changed.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "WELS Shrinkers in Fellowship with Islam via Warren...":

Warren's biggest error was addressing a large audience of unbelievers and failing to declare Christ crucified. Instead of taking advantage of an opportunity to reach the lost, he instead spoke about the "common good" and other post modernist pipe-dreams.

Do certain WELS pastors, upon meeting with the doctrinally lost, take a bold stand and point out error, or do they cower behind fake smiles, opportunism, and self-serving desire?

Post modernism is a grave threat to any confessional church and will at least lead to bland (and deadly) ecumenicism. "Lemkeel," a regular new-age troll over at Bailing Water, is a good example of this. In her sincere efforts to embrace diversity, cultural competency, and toe the party line at a public university, she is more than willing to compromise the Word. The poison is so strong that she is unable to see her error.

Let Obama keep Warren and let WELS stick to the Word. Both false doctrine and political/ideological post modernism can be overcome with a little education and adhering to first principles. In the WELS, we need to study the Word and the Confessions and not false prophets. In our society, we need to brush up on basic economic principles and realize that destroying perfectly usable and fully paid vehicles in order to get into debt by buying a shiny new car is absurd.


Positively UOJ at NPH




Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "FIC Shrinker Count:August, 2009 Issue":

I received a copy of "Positively Lutheran" by said author. Big disappointment. "Objective Justification" is the only form explicitly discussed. Gone is the confessional emphasis on justification by grace through faith alone. A triumph of the 2 & 1/4 redemption theory: Atonement/Justification/justification.

---

Chapter 1 – "The Great Comfort the Doctrine of Objective Justification Gives"

1. Why do we use the word "objective" to describe justification?
2. While the Bible never uses the term "objective justification," it teaches this doctrine quite clearly. Who identified Jesus as the "Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world"? Why does the church sing these words right before receiving the Lord's Supper?
3. Give some synonyms for "justify."
4. Explain what Luther meant by the "blessed exchange."
5. Where should we look for the assurance that God forgives us all our sins?
6. Where would we have to look if something had to happen in us before God would forgive us?
7. Does objective justification teach that anyone "receives" the forgiveness of sins without faith? What is the significance of this fact for doing mission work?
8. How does this teaching of objective justification give you certainty that you really are forgiven by God?
9. Can you receive true comfort from God if you are not sure that he has forgiven you? Why or why not?


Sunday, August 9, 2009

Now Thank We All Our God




"Now Thank We All Our God"
by Martin Rinckart, 1586-1649
Translated by Catherine Winkworth, 1829-1878

1. Now thank we all our God
With heart and hands and voices,
Who wondrous things hath done,
In whom His world rejoices;
Who from our mother's arms
Hath blessed us on our way
With countless gifts of love,
And still is ours today.

2. Oh, may this bounteous God
Through all our life be near us,
With ever joyful hearts
And blessed peace to cheer us;
And keep us in His grace
And guide us when perplexed
And free us from all ills
In this world and the next.

3. All praise and thanks to God
The Father now be given,
The Son, and Him who reigns
With them in highest heaven:
The one eternal God,
Whom earth and heaven adore!
For thus it was, is now,
And shall be evermore.

The Lutheran Hymnal
Hymn #36
Text: Ecclus.50:22-24
Author: Martin Rinckart, 1636
Translated by: Catherine Winkworth, 1858
Titled: "Nun danket alle Gott"
Composer: Johann Crueger, 1648
Tune: "Nun danket alle Gott"

***

GJ - Borrowed from The Finkelsteinery. For legal issues, contact my attorney - S. O. Sumi.


FIC Shrinker Count:
August, 2009 Issue


1. J. Aderman, a founder of Church and Change, published an awful article about the Ten Commandments. If anyone can make sense of his glorified children's sermon, let me know. Don't worry - he has a whole series up his sleeve. I wonder who arranged that.

2. Frosty Bivens, Fuller student, has another article.

3. James Mattek has an article. Don Patterson is on his board, so that is reason enough to be suspicious. Another reason - Ted Hartwig is Mattek's father-in-law and the official heresiarch of WELS. One WELS member told me that Wisconsin Lutheran Child and Family Services is central to Church and Change. I won't know for sure until Patterson officially denies it.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "FIC Shrinker Count:August, 2009 Issue":

Mattek is as "Church and Change" as you can get, at least in mentality, if not in membership. (I do not know if he is a member and CaC or if he participates.) However, he did not last long at Trinity in Watertown. Many members were not happy with the innovations he introduced in church structure and other areas. While now "working" in Milwaukee, he maintains his pricy Victoria estate in Watertown and commutes.

In accepting the call to Wisconsin Lutheran Child and Family Service, Mattek made it known that he was making the move because Gurgel wanted him there. Gurgel, of course, was the patsy in all things, with Mueller and Kelm running the show, as they had done with Mischke.

***

GJ - The FIC editor is so bad that simply having an article in the magazine raises suspicions that the author is a founding member of Church and Chicanery. Look at the roster of FIC authors over the years: Wayne Mueller, David Valleskey, Paul Calvin Kelm, Peter Pan-denominational, James Mattek, Frosty Bivens, and Jim Aderman hisself. That is just a sample.


The Ninth Sunday after Trinity



The Lost Sheep, by Norma Boeckler


The Ninth Sunday after Trinity

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

Bethany Lutheran Worship, 8 AM Phoenix Time


The Hymn #39 Praise to the Lord 3:1
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual 1 Corinthians 10:6-13
The Gospel Luke 16:1-9
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #370 My Hope Is Built 3:11

Making Friends, According to Jesus

The Hymn #294 O Word of God Incarnate 3:31
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #316 O Living Bread 3:45

KJV 1 Corinthians 10:6 Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted. 7 Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play. 8 Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand. 9 Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents. 10 Neither murmur ye, as some of them also murmured, and were destroyed of the destroyer. 11 Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come. 12 Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall. 13 There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it.

KJV Luke 16:1 And he said also unto his disciples, There was a certain rich man, which had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods. 2 And he called him, and said unto him, How is it that I hear this of thee? give an account of thy stewardship; for thou mayest be no longer steward. 3 Then the steward said within himself, What shall I do? for my lord taketh away from me the stewardship: I cannot dig; to beg I am ashamed. 4 I am resolved what to do, that, when I am put out of the stewardship, they may receive me into their houses. 5 So he called every one of his lord's debtors unto him, and said unto the first, How much owest thou unto my lord? 6 And he said, An hundred measures of oil. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and sit down quickly, and write fifty. 7 Then said he to another, And how much owest thou? And he said, An hundred measures of wheat. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and write fourscore. 8 And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light. 9 And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations.

Ninth Sunday After Trinity
Lord God, heavenly Father, who hast bountifully given us Thy blessing and our daily bread: We beseech Thee, preserve us from covetousness, and so quicken our hearts that we willingly share Thy blessed gifts with our needy brethren; that we may be found faithful stewards of Thy gifts, and abide in Thy grace when we shall be removed from our stewardship, and shall come before Thy judgment, through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

Making Friends, According to Jesus
Luke 16: 8 And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light. 9 And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations.

This Gospel lesson is one of those shockers, if we misunderstand it. Luther said, “It will make a lot of money for the monks and priests, if we let them.”

I like this Gospel lesson because it shows how Jesus taught. This is a passage for believers. The ordinary crowd of gawkers who wanted miracles would never understand this. In fact, there are enough unusual details to make any pastor go back and study the text.

First of all, we have the example of the unjust steward. He is presented as non-believer who is good at one thing, taking care of himself. There is a little humor in this story too.

Steward is the KJV for household manager. Since this man was very rich, he had a manager to take care of the daily needs of the estate. Things were not going well, so the rich man was ready to fire the steward. He was calling for an audit of the accounts.

This is funny – the steward knew what he was facing, so he said, “What shall I do? for my lord taketh away from me the stewardship: I cannot dig; to beg I am ashamed.” The steward was too much of an accountant to get a job doing manual labor. He was too proud to beg, so he was stymied about getting new job.

This is the part that stymies everyone at the first hearing or reading. The unjust steward went over the accounts and marked them down to make friends with the people doing business with his master.

Even more surprising, the rich man commended the steward for being so crafty.

The biggest shock is Jesus’ conclusion –

Luke 16:9 : for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light. And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations.

Mammon is a Hebraic word meaning money. As Luther wrote, Mammon is having money enough for our needs and to help our neighbors.

The story does not commend the steward for being dishonest. He is good at what he does. Luther’s example is funny. “She is a flirt, and the whole world follows after her.” That is not saying – Be a flirt, but – She is a skillful flirt.

So at first the steward is in trouble for doing a bad job, but when he showed himself wily and manipulative, his rich master thought, “Now there is a guy who knows the ways of the business world.”

We should not be shocked at this. Crowds gathered to shout “Run, OJ, run” when he was trying to escape justice. Congressmen will face prison for their misdeeds and their hometowns will greet them with applause and treat them as martyrs. The same thing has happened in the Lutheran Church. If a man is questioned for his known infidelities, he is “being persecuted” and an array of officials will slime anyone who engages in this persecution. And, if a pastor is fired for not doing his job, for being a poor steward, he is admired for grabbing his job back, even if his arrogance and greed are likely to finish off his congregation. As Luther wrote, “The world loves wolf preaching.”

All this sounds so bad, so why did Jesus use a bad example to teach a lesson?

Luke 16: 8 And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light. 9 And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations.

The qualifier is important – the children in this generation. That is, in this life on earth, the unbelievers are wiser than the believers.

Some examples are all too obvious. Why would entire Lutheran denominations give themselves over to Reformed doctrine? Even worse, why would all the clergy and laity watch passively as it happened? That has been the story of all the synods in America for the last 30+ years. The participants knew what they were doing and lied about it. The rest knew it was happening and chose to be silent.

Here is an interesting example. The Seminex leader, John Tietjen, insisted on a female assistant when he was made bishop of Metro Chicago for ELCA. So they canned him. Even the Seminex supporters thought Tietjen was foolish! So they arranged for a Texas call to get him out of town and give him a living until retirement. In Texas ELCA tried to fund a big new Church Growth congregation. Tietjen, who was good at opposition, organized the ELCA pastors to oppose it. ELCA gave up and started it in Yorba Linda, California (where we are going Wednesday). That mega-church-to-be failed miserably and Tietjen looked like a wise man (for once).

Any unbeliever would say, “Why would a church spend all that money to promote the opposite of what it believes?”

An unbeliever would also ask, “Why would any church let its schools go to rot and ruin? They are the training ground for the next generation?”

In secular jobs, people are actually polite to their supervisors, even if they do not like them very much, for good reasons and bad. In the church, just the opposite in true, and people destroy their own congregations to get even with a pastor who teaches the Word and refuses to be their hired hand.
This Gospel lesson emphasizes good works, as many other passages do. Luther divided the Christian faith into two parts – our relationship to God (faith) and our relationship to our neighbor (good works). The Scriptures do not contradict themselves, so good works passages are always about the outward man (what we do) while the faith passages are about the inward man (what we believe).

There is a relationship between what we believe and what we do. Often our actions betray what we really believe.

Unrighteous mammon is money, so making friends with money means doing good things for our neighbor in need. There is the reason why our nation is overwhelmingly generous toward others, even our recent enemies. The Christian faith moves people to share with others. A disaster anywhere in the world will generate giving, not only from individuals and groups, but also from our government.

When money fails – when we are dead – our actions will be reflected in the Final Judgment. That parable emphasizes what we did here on earth, feeding, clothing, visiting. In other words, those people will stand up for us and say, “He visited me in the hospital. She sent food when we needed it. They got us past a bad time in our lives.”

Luther was fond of saying, “God has done everything for us, providing for our spiritual and material needs with great generosity. There is nothing for us to do except care for our neighbor.” That happens in sharing the Word, which occurs naturally in our daily discourse, and also in caring for our neighbors’ needs.

Saturday, August 8, 2009

Reformed Magazine Goes Belly Up - More Periodicals To Follow




The Reformed Church in America is closing down its magazine. The United Methodists did the same a long time ago. The RCA (Robert Schuller's denomination) had a tiny circulation, down to 20,000 for a denomination of 166,000. The Lutheran (ELCA) said the RCA magazine was prized for its editorial independence. I supposed that means prized by very few.

An interesting note added that some of the magazine's money was diverted for a quarterly Church Growth periodical - RCA Today, the Reformed equivalent of WELS' TELL magazine, started in 1977 by Ron Roth and Paul Calvin Kelm.

Fantasy Satire
A radical departure would have looked like this - a secretive cabal--The Means of Grace Network--diverted some RCA money and started a magazine called The Efficacious Word, Living Sacraments, but called TEWLS to fool the masses.

In spite of a few objections, TEWLS announced its goal of promoting Lutheran doctrine. Editor Paul Luther Vanderkelm used his position to affirm Reformed doctrine while covertly promoting Lutheran doctrine. "We all know the Word of God is not efficacious," wrote Vanderkelm, in an editorial, "but wouldn't it be great if it were?"

Various stooges were trotted out to praise such books as Luther's Commentary on Galatians, and The Large Catechism. David Lutherskey wrote a magazine article called "Just the Word and Ordinances, or God's True Means of Grace?" He cleverly used a question as a title, to avert suspicion. "I've come across some strange books in the church library," said layman Dutch Vanderhooft. Professor Lutherskey said, "Maybe Luther's sermons could help us with our work. His denomination is still the largest Protestant group in the world. We can learn a lot from Luther. He was a Christian too."

More funds were diverted and outside grants requested for sending pastors to conservative Lutheran seminaries. (This is a fantasy folks, so assume the seminaries were still Lutheran and not promoting Deformed Dreck.) RCA ministers came back to write in TEWLS that they could all learn a lot from those Lutheran schools.

TEWLS editors and supporters managed to get their buddies, who studied at the Lutheran seminaries, into positions at their headquarters. Their first real triumph was replacing the evangelism professor at their seminary with a Professor of the External Word. Fortunately, most people did not know what that meant. The Means of Grace Network members winked at each other during the solemn installation of their chosen professor Artful Seelsorger.

When the MOGN met, they worked on good dodges for the accusation they were covert Lutherans.



  1. "Didn't you study at both Concordias and Bethany?" Answer - "I am thankful to God that I had the chance to learn firsthand about the errors of the Lutherans. But they do have a lot of useful tips we can use. They are Christians too - we can learn from them."

  2. "Your statements in TEWLS are almost identical to Lutheran doctrine. In fact, you are always quoting Luther, Chemnitz, Gerhard, Gerhardt, Chytraeus." Answer - "We sing Gerhardt's hymns. Does that make us Lutheran? Don't fall for legalism. I am well trained by our seminary. I can separate the wheat from the chaff."

  3. "You seem to be weak on the ordinances. We have to maintain our standards that baptism and the Lord's Supper do nothing and are merely symbolic." Answer - "We are not introducing anything new or changing anything. The Means of Grace are doctrinally neutral. We can call ourselves anything we want, but the Word is still effective. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater."

***

GJ - But that never seems to happen. The Deformed trash Lutheran doctrine and worship, and the Lutherans pay them tuition money and go to their expensive conferences.

One word about baptismal regeneration, the Real Presence, the Means of Grace, or the efficacious Word and the Reformed will go into epic shunning mode. So who has doctrinal discipline - the Reformed or the Lutherans?


More on Divorced Pastors - Why Pietists Cannot Be Trusted




Someone thought I was being too harsh when I said all divorced pastors should be removed from pastoral work, and that includes being booted upstairs as a consultant, mission counselor, or evangelism expert.

The writer claimed that some pastors are left by their wives, etc. Arguing from an exception is always going to promote weak principles. In fact, that is how so many divorced pastors kept their jobs--and often their mistresses--by making themselves the victims. Wives may be completely at fault at times (I doubt it), but the Bible still says "husband of but one wife," and not "one wife at a time."

What did divorced pastors do for WELS in Columbus? Floyd Luther Stolzenburg was promoted as a Church Growth expert and treated as a WELS pastor, even though he was kicked out as a Missouri pastor and never a member of WELS. The only cause he favored was himself and his false doctrine. Ditto Roger Zehms, another divorced pastor, but friends with Wayne Mueller. So he could promote CG too, even though he had no call, except one "directly from the Holy Spirit," as he said at one LPR meeting - explaining why he and Floyd answered to no one. Marc Schroeder divorced his first wife and married his girlfriend, but they were both children of WELS professors so that made it Scriptural. Marc loved Church Growth, got kicked out of WELS, and joined Missouri with his congregation. The Donor, as he was called, was also divorced. All were "Scriptural" divorces - the most common use of "Scriptural" in Columbus WELS churches.

A WELS member wrote: "I remember Columbus having all these divorced pastors. It seems to me these guys are always the ones that promoted the church growth issues. They talk about love but are unloving."

Marvin Schwan did a lot for WELS and Missouri, showing them how little a ton of money can do. Marvin divorced his wife and married his manager's wife. Marvin's second wife became a Lutheran, apparently proving money is a Means of Grace. But when he died, she became a Roman Catholic again, proving money is not as powerful a means as WELS/ELS once thought.

Christian News has another fine example of what I mean. A group photo shows Herman Otten grinning with David Menton (CLC - sic) and Phil Giessler (ex-LCMS). Giessler was carrying on an affair when he was the overpaid head of God's Word to the Nation Bible Society. What was supposed to be a revision of the Beck Bible turned into a Marvin Schwan funded bonanza for a few people, especially Phil. He was getting staggering sums.

At one point Giessler's long-suffering wife told her LCMS husband to choose between her and the mistress. He chose his mistress and his putative son with that woman. Rev. Phil announced his own ex-communication because he was unrepentant. His Bible empire went on life support.

Giessler was divorced for cause and joined a Pietistic ministerium. They did not allow divorced pastors, so they did not list him. But he served a church on their list. His second wife, who was his former mistress, got tired of living on very little (no Schwan loot) and left him, telling him, "He isn't your son after all."

Rev. Phil got married a third time, rising in Otten's esteem with each marriage. Otten even said on the phone once, "Phil is here with his wife." I said, "His third?" Herman said, "Third? Why do you say third?" I went through the history, as told to me by Otten and recorded somewhat in his tabloid. Herman said, "Oh yes. You are right. She is a nice person."

Otten contended that Phil was such a good teacher of the Bible. Readers can imagine what I said in response.

I wrote before - conservatives have lost credibility in America because they are just as loose as their Leftist counterparts, and conservatives excuse the worst behavior because "he is a nice guy" or something similar. Luther argued that men who abandon their families should be arrested. I doubt whether Luther would address Phil as "Dr." The latest CN article identifies Dr. Phil as a "Bible scholar." That must mean someone who makes a choice living from a book he never reads.

Pietism breeds legalism and antinomianism. A CLC (sic) layman like Menton will denounce people for publishing in CN, because the LCMS is evil and Otten is still in it. However, CLC (sic) pastors can publish in CN if they limit themselves to letters. And Menton can publish in CN because...well, just because. Now Menton is involved in an unionistic Creation museum. And the trouble with the LCMS is - they tolerate unionistic activities!

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "More on Divorced Pastors - Why Pietists Cannot Be ...":

"Floyd Luther Stolzenburg was promoted as a Church Growth expert and treated as a WELS pastor, even though he was kicked out as a Missouri pastor and never a member of WELS."

How many children did Floyd have?

***

GJ - Pro-life pastors Jay Webber and Roger Kovaciny could answer how many children Floyd fathered. They worked with and supported Floyd, taking money from his Masonic church for their projects. Maybe VP Paul Kuske and Doctrinal Pussycat Robert Mueller would offer some facts. Both claimed to know all about Floyd before installing him as a CG guru for WELS without Floyd belonging to WELS - a synod devoted to fellowship principles.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "More on Divorced Pastors - Why Pietists Cannot Be ...":

Hey Dr. Jackson do you agree that this is high tech gossip against your fellow christians (sic). It is not very pastor like.

***

GJ - No I do not agree. A divorce is a public matter, with legal documents filed for anyone to see - unless sealed by the court. WELS/ELS officials have shamed themselves by promoting and defending men who should be in prison instead of a pulpit. The alleged shepherds watching over the flock, the District Pussycats, are wolves in sheep's clothing. They are very harsh - but only with the people who find out the truth.

You will never hear from a WELS DP that one of their own went to the state prison for offenses against children in his own congregation, that two WELS church workers murdered their wives. But oh do they have a creative streak when it comes to making up stories about people who threaten to unfeather their nests. Woe unto those who cross DP Hategood and VP Corruption.

---

Bruce Church has left a new comment on your post "More on Divorced Pastors - Why Pietists Cannot Be ...":

Dr. Jackson,

I know that you've pointed out that antinomianism runs rampant in the UOJ-lovin' synods, but perhaps it never occurred to your readers what antinomianism actually looks like in real life, or that the behavior some commentators engage in is actually various forms of antinomianism. For instance, the guy who wrote that you engage in high tech gossip is really just throwing out a red herring. In other words, he's trying to undercut and silence anyone who would try to apply the law to, or just plain point out, egregious situations in the synods.

Antinomianists undercut critics even though they must realize that someone has to raise a stink or else the situation in the Church would become intolerable in short order. Imagine what it would be like if public ministers knew they could have three or even four wives and no one would say anything
contrariwise.

Antinomianism (anti-law-ism) entails a person, or persons, making a lot of excuses why the law does not apply to him (or them), or to someone he or they like, as well as castigating, name-calling, or even slandering people who publicly object to public behavior that does not conform to the Scriptures, all in order to get critics to back off.

A favorite of antinomianists is to misapply Mat 07:01: "Do not judge, or you too will be judged." However, verse five of that chapter shows that what is meant is hypocritical judging. Notice Jesus does say to eventually take the speck out of the brother's eye, not to ignore it forever, but first tend to one's own sin. Since Dr. Jackson is still married to his first wife, he can fire away at public ministers who've had more than one (1 Tim. 3:2, 12; Tit. 1:6).

Antinominists may resort to other red herrings, like saying a person is not in fellowship with the WELS, or another synod, and therefore it is none of his business. Another red herring is charging a critic with violation of the 8th Commandment, or a violation
of Matthew 18 where one is supposed to go to the brother privately first. Both the 8th Commandment and Matthew 18 pertain to dealing with private sins privately, but the Ministry of the Word is public for the most part, and public sin and
false teaching must be rebuked publicly.


Luther and the Proposed Council of Trent



The Antichrist, affectionately known as B-16.


"... we should take him-the pope, the cardinals, and whatever riffraff belongs to His Idolatrous and Papal Holiness-and (as blasphemers) tear out their tongues from the back, and nail them on the gallows.... Then one could allow them to hold a council, or as many as they wanted, on the gallows, or in hell among all the devils."



Wider das Papsttum in Rom, vom Teufel gestiftet, quoted by Cardinal Ratzinger from A. Lapple, Martin Luther: Leben, Bilder, Dokumente (Munich/Zurich, 1982), pp. 252f. (The above translation is from Luther's Works, vol. 41 [Church and Ministry 1111, Helmut T. Lehmann, general ed. [Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 19661, p. 308.)

Cardinal Ratzinger became the current pope by making a deal with the liberals to appoint one of their own to replace him as head of the Inquisition (the old name for Ratzinger's post), the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith.

Glimpse of the Top Secret Headquarters of the Shrinkers in WELS



Google Maps was recently updated to include a wider view of the Center.



Church and Chicanery leaders Ron Roth and Jeff Davis came up with a novel plan to resupply the depleted coffers of their organization.

They found a homeless man in downtown Milwaukee and drew a sign for him, to make it look original.

Everyone who visits their secret headquarters will get a chance to have fun and leave some loot behind.

The homeless man will get to keep all the money, after Roth and Davis deduct their expenses, fees, commissions, and wages.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Glimpse of the Top Secret Headquarters of the Shri...":

Perhaps Latte Lutheran (WELS, Madison, WI) ought to take note of the reader feedback at the end of the article. WELS is at best so passe!

http://www.indystar.com/article/20090809/LOCAL/908090377/1001/news


Rave Reviews from UOJ-Shrinkers




  1. "You are divisive."
  2. "You are an evil man."
  3. "You have violated the Eighth Commandment."
  4. "You have not talked to these people first."
  5. "Nothing but pure poison."
  6. "When you finally die, everyone will be relieved."
  7. "No one reads your blog."
  8. "You write your own comments."
  9. "You don't have a friend in the world."
  10. "You have no credibility."
  11. "You use too many quotations."
  12. "You haven't proven anything."
  13. "You are a gutless coward." - Anonymous


***

GJ - These people should be trying to convert me to Pietism through their love, but I do not feel it so far.




Gone in 24 Hours





"WELS clergy is (sic) afrain (sic) to speak their own minds when their views might not sync completely with the party line. Greg Jackson knew this long ago. (Oh NO! I have uttered the un-utterable name!!!!)"

***

GJ - This was posted and erased soon after, on another site.

I don't have to prove this was written by a WELS graduate, do I? I am writing a macro to put (sic) in their messages more efficiently.

More proof that it came from a WELS graduate - as soon as he spoke the truth, he erased it.


Friday, August 7, 2009

Time To Study the Means of Grace



Word and Sacrament by Norma Boeckler


A large collection of quotations on the efficacy of the Word is here.


No better sign of Lutheran apostasy is its silence about the Means of Grace in the last 30 years. In fact, the Missouri battle for the Bible was simply another installment, not a long-term solution. The Missouri Synod laity and pastors opposed the rationalistic and unionistic trends that moved their synod into fellowship with the ALC, LCA, while dabbling with Romanism. Arguing for inerrancy was rather easy, since most people active in the 1960s were raised with the historic conception of the Bible being inerrant or infallible, without contradiction or error. Only those brainwashed in the Historical-Critical Method thought otherwise, but they were the leaders of the LCMS, ALC, LCA, and WELS...among the followers of Gerke and Jungkuntz. A large number of Seminex leaders graduated from Northwestern College, Watertown. Like Missouri, WELS never had the guts to deal completely with the HCM advocates. Ted Hartwig remained in WELS, launching the unisex Creeds in the odious Christian Worship.

Not trusting in the Means of Grace means turning to methods, tricks, gimmicks, techniques, mostly borrowed from business, advertising, and Enthusiasm. For example, the next trend in the Shrinker Movement is to have cuddling parties. That was old a few years ago, among the unwashed hordes of bored and lonely secularists. As the LCA used to say, now someone is going to "baptize the popular trend." Here is the post on CGM cuddling, which is bound to be more popular than snake-handling.

The Means of Grace are God's instruments to bring grace to us. He has provided everything and pledged Himself to give us his pardoning grace in no other way. The Enthusiasts hate the Means of Grace and make fun of this Biblical doctrine. Entire Biblical translations (NIV, RSV, etc) have been given over to erasing such Means of Grace passages as:

  1. Baptism now saves you.

  2. Is this not communion with the Body of Christ?

  3. Go therefore and teach all nations, baptizing them...


The Word of God is powerful and effective because it is not man's program or method. The Word is like yeast in dough, slowly permeating and affecting every particle.

The Word is like seed sown carelessly and yet producing a bumper crop in the midst of many calamities caused by Satan's wiles and man's carelessness.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Time To Study the Means of Grace":

It is especially the Nicene Creed in Christian Worship: A Lutheran Hymnal that is weak. The words "became fully human" are very weak and could be easily accepted by the neo-orthodox. All three words are open to misunderstanging. "Became" can be a process or a one time event. "Fully" does not clearly carry biblical Christology, since we accept the fact that Jesus did not have two personalities, but that he had only a divine personality, and not a human personality. Also, because of the saying, "To err is human," some may draw the conclusion that Jesus had a sinful nature. "Human" can be used in a variety of ways. Some people say, "Our dog is as human as it can be," just as a woman may say, "That dress is simply divine." Neither "human" or "divine" carry the full clarity needed in a creed.

***

GJ - I can add a few more caveats to the clear and compelling ones above.

  1. The same thing was done to the Athanasian Creed, but never addressed.
  2. WELS lied and said they were forced to do it by the ecumenical commission that wrote this bastardized creed. No other Lutherans had used these Leftie creeds up to that point. So did the unionistic commission hold WELS at gunpoint or threaten to take away their grants?
  3. Ted Hartwig, heresiarch of WELS, officially presented the feminist creeds in the magazine and the journal. Hartwig was never disciplined for promoting the Historical-Critical (apostate) approach to Isaiah. WELS PR said he was, but he simply became a rallying point for all the apostates in WELS. Meanwhile, WELS charged Missouri with no having doctrinal discipline.
  4. WELS showed itself to be arrogant and divisive by introducing ambiguous creeds to Lutherans when all Lutherans--indeed all Christians--endorse the clear witness of the Ecumenical Creeds.
  5. Worst of all, James Tiefel was left in charge of a hymnal.


Pietistic Influences Among the Midwestern Lutherans



Shrinkers have increased their quota of liquid lunches.


Read the Efficacy Mother-lode here.

The Synodical Conference was founded on Pietism rather than Lutheran Orthodoxy.

Walther wrote this in 1878:

""My dear God-fearing father had taught me from earliest childhood that the Bible is God’s Word. But I had to leave my father’s house very early, in my eighth year, to live in unbelieving circles. I did not lose the historical faith. Like an angel of God it accompanied me through life. But during those more than eight years of Gymnasium life I was unconverted."

Thus Walther recorded, when he was 67, that he had faith but was unconverted. Therefore, he was still writing as a Pietist at the peak of his career. I have not read the collected works of Walther hagiography, but I do realize he struggled with the Pietism which seemed to rescue him from rationalism while delivering him to Law bondage.

Listening to various members of Christian sects, I have often heard them say, "I was baptized and a regular church member but I was not a real Christian until..." Sometimes the event is the experience of being born-again (as they call it, misusing John 3). For Pentecostals, the conversion is to tongue-speaking and falling on the floor.

Walther himself criticized levels of faith in Law and Gospel, and told how he struggled with the norms of Pietism he learned. The confession quoted above is typical of Pietism, believing and yet being unconverted. Walther described the Bible as having only two categories - believers and unbelievers, but Walther added believers who are converted and believers who are unconverted.

The triumphalism of Walther when crowing about the Missouri Synod is apparent in his published speeches. I heard a recent version when a Missouri writer wrote to me: "The Missouri Synod is the best one because it was least affected by Pietism." Ahem - that response is a good Pietistic statement, emphasizing works and spiritual superiority.

The original Wisconsin Synod was created by Pietistic, unionistic mission societies. The Michigan Synod that joined up with Wisconsin (becoming WELS in the fullness of time) was just as anti-confessional and unionistic at first. Due to the influence of Walther, Bading, and Hoenecke, Wisconsin moved away from its Pietistic roots.

All the Scandinavians left the womb of the state church via Pietism, the Norwegians included. Pietism was the supposed answer to spiritual lethargy, alcholism, and apostasy in the state churches. In Sweden, one pastor became a leader in the temperance movement when a drunken fight between two women broke out during the sermon. Alcolism was a major social issue, and the Pietistic Methodists had a cure for everyone - the Law - take a pledge. In addition, Pentecostalism was not unknown.

The anti-confessional basis of Pietism--"doctrine divides, service unites"--contributed greatly to free thinking among the Midwestern Lutherans. The Swedish Lutherans, who eventually created the Augustana (Augsburg Confession) Synod, the struggle meant moving away from their servitude to revivalism, legalism, and Methodism. The Pietists had proven to Augustana how unreliable they could be. Like WELS, Augustana continued its lover's quarrel with Pietism, never quite divorced and yet quick to criticize. After WWII, Augustana debated whether to allow dancing on the college campus - a typical Methodist concern.

Proving and dating a born-again experience was a common requirement for Pietistic Lutherans during this time. That experience was the requirement for full membership in many cases, replacing fidelity to the Book of Concord.