Saturday, November 28, 2009

Mark Jeske, Church and Change Leader, Featured on LCMS Home Page










John Parlow, Mark Jeske, Paul Calvin Kelm, Dom Perignon Patterson










Mark is featured with Time of Grace on the home page of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod. Has anyone heard of one denomination promoting the TV show of another one?


Catch "Time of Grace" on KFUO–AM

Tune in to KFUO–AM 850 or listen online each week as Pastor Jeske delivers a Bible–based message that provides the hope and truth of God's Word in down–to–earth "straight talk."

KFUO-AM airing a new show

KFUO-AM is now airing "Time of Grace," a weekly program featuring Pastor Mark Jeske, senior pastor at St. Marcus Lutheran Church in Milwaukee, Wis.

Each week, Pastor Jeske delivers a Bible-based message providing the hope and truth of God's Word in down-to-earth "straight talk."

Tune in at 11:30 a.m. on Saturdays to KFUO-AM 850 in St. Louis or listen wherever you are online at http://www.kfuoam.org/

***

GJ - Does anyone dispute now that Mark Jeske is joining the LCMS and taking his church and others with him?

I recall him discussing the amalgamation issue at Northwestern College. He was clearly on the side of closing the school, because the professors' attitude had been, "Don't let the door hit you on the way out."

Some people may say the same thing about Mark's exit, which has been covert and dishonest, just like his Church and Change groupies.

Mark is fifth generation WELS. He will never leave, but I see him featured on the LCMS site and not on the WELS site.

Several former WELS pastors are now Shrinkers in the LCMS, and they went to The Sausage Factory when he did. However, the key issue is the growing repudiation of Shrinkage by Enthusiasm in WELS. Kieschnick's Missouri embraces it. Shroeder's Wisconsin shrivels it.

---

TShinnick has left a new comment on your post "Mark Jeske, Church and Change Leader, Featured on ...":

So, the LC-MS has chosen to put him on their website. Why are we hating on him for that?

***

TShinnick has left a new comment on your post "Mark Jeske, Church and Change Leader, Featured on ...":

So, the LC-MS has chosen to put him on their website. Why are we hating on him for that? 

TShinnick has left a new comment on your post "Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi - Recessiona...":

I fail to see how this post does anything besides slander the likes of Parlow, Jeske, Schroeder, Ski and the like. Perhaps you ought to write something constructive for anyone. Attempt it next time, please. I hope you quote this comment in such a post."

Tyler Shinnick

About Me

I am 21 years old. I'm currently in my senior year at Martin Luther College. I am studying for the pastoral ministry.
Tyler Shinnick

* Age: 21
* Gender: Male
* Astrological Sign: Pisces
* Zodiac Year: Dragon
* Industry: Student
* Location: Appleton : Wisconsin : United States

---

Tyler Shinnick (Martin Luther) wrote on September 24, 2009 at 11:38pm
I have struggled for quite some time as to why we subscribe to the Athanasian Creed as part of our confessions. This concern is because of the damnatory clause at the end of the creed: "This is the true Christian faith. Whoever does not faithfully and firmly believe this cannot be saved." Certainly, one must believe in the triune God to be saved, but the Athanasian creed doesn't stop there. Included in the creed is, "filioque", saying that the Holy Spirit proceeded from the father "and the son".

Are you really comfortable saying that whoever doesn't believe that will spend eternity in hell? I'm not. Did Jesus explain that to the thief on the cross? That's a quite small point of scripture that has been debated and has led to the biggest divide in the history of the Christian church. Are we seriously confessing that the entire Eastern church is a non-Christian group destined for hell? Would a single pastor in our church body assert that?

Yet they've all confessed it. Why?


---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Mark Jeske, Church and Change Leader, Featured on ...":

Tyler Shinnick's statements clearly show what's in the Synodical pipeline. The Confessional congregations deceive themselves if they think anything substantial was accomplished at the 2009 Convention. Shrinkers run the WELS education system. The MLC and WLC statements defending MLC homoerotic homecoming video are just another testament to the current condition of the WELS and a view to its future.

---

mjleyrer has left a new comment on your post "Mark Jeske, Church and Change Leader, Featured on ...":

Yeah heaven forbid a orhodox Lutheran get on TV and actually spread the Gospel.

I don't really understand why we're hating on the LCMS for featuring him on their website either...It's gotta have something to do with that spreading the Gospel thing right? Or maybe it's because he reaches certain people who can't get to church. That could be it. Yeah, you're totally right he should get off the air.

[GJ - See Mr. Leyrer's blog for a goldmine of misspelled words and grammatical errors, overshadowed by incoherence on a grand scale. MLC/WLC grad or student?]


---

mjleyrer has left a new comment on your post "Mark Jeske, Church and Change Leader, Featured on ...":

Oh come on. You guys are making Jeske sound like he's a freaking prophet of Baal or something. Calm Down.

I suppose we would rather have those people he's reaching with his TV show go over to the ELCA or maybe a baptist church.

Oh, and Jacko I left a special post on my blog just for you. Wink wink.

***

GJ - They need not attend a Babtist church when they have WELS pastors trained by Babtists. Jeske, Parlow, Kelm, First VP Huebner, Olson, Aderman, Witte, and Bruce Becker are the core of Shrinkage and false doctrine.

How the Little Sect on the Prairie Contributes To Apostasy




Norman Teigen (left) and Rolf Preus. Norman's father exposed the Synodical Conference error about the efficacy of the Word in the Lord's Supper. The ELS ministers chickened out on the topic,
just as they did with Pope John the Malefactor's destruction of the divine call.


LutherQuest(sic)



Rolf Preus: "When the synod is a church and a synod president with no altar or pulpit is nevertheless a pastor of the church then divine gospel authority is replaced by carnal legal authority not just potentially but necessarily.

The reason men cannot understand this is because they think they can understand the ministry of the Word apart from the actual divine justification of the sinner through faith. It cannot be done."


GJ - This comment is from a pastor I know:
Doesn't this sentence contradict UOJ? Rolf Preus arguing about the nature of the office of pastor!


---

Another person wrote:

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Kurtzahn, The Pancake Pope of the CLC (sic), Unloa...":

Rolf cannot comprehend the contents of the book he "edited", with his brother, maybe because they so mucked up the text and references of their late father's book; JUSTIFICATION AND ROME by Robert Preus.

They gave the book a very poor layout. But more importantly, it is obviously tampered with in the actual text proper, as well as in the reference sections, in not a few, but many places.

Many quotes from the BoC that their father would, I believe, have intended being in the text proper (to give greater clarity to non-Lutherans reading it), appear to have been dropped by his boys, probably because too detrimental to the UOJ barrow the Preus boys so vehemently continue to push.

The true Apostolic/Lutheran Justification by Faith Alone teaching; nevertheless shines clearly through, on the whole,in spite of the afore-mentioned impoverishments.

***

GJ -  Some synodical trivia: I noticed that Rolf took on David Buegler here. Buegler was Jack Cascione's candidate for DP in Ohio. Cascione was delighted that his guy won - then his guy turned ecumenical overnight. What a shock! Rolf is Cascione's chapel dean at LutherQuest (sic). Rolf once went to the Ukraine to spend some Schwan or Stolzenburg money, thanks to Jay Webber. Birds of a feather do flock together - do not stand under their roosting places too long.

Rolf's position on the ministry, quoted above, contradicts UOJ. I hope he donates the manuscript of Justification and Rome to a library, so scholars can see what his father actually wrote. Having Rolf and Daniel edit it was a stroke of genius - like having two house painters touch up a Rembrandt.

The Little Sect on the Prairie had a chance to deal with doctrine when B. Teigen wrote his famous book on the Lord's Supper. Instead, they accepted synodical orders to silence themselves about Receptionism - the Synodical Conference error that the elements become the Body and Blood of Christ when received by the individual. The political reason behind the silencing was clear enough - no one could admit that Holy Mother Synod was ever wrong about anything. The doctrinal error behind Receptionism is Enthusiasm, thoroughly denounced by the Book of Concord - separating the Holy Spirit from the Word.

In muting themselves about Enthusiasm in the Lord's Supper, the ELS clergy and laity also silenced themselves about Enthusiasm in the Church Growth Movement. Orvick welcomed an essay endorsing Valleskey's Figs from Thistles essay (WLQ) and this endorsement was duly published in the ELS knock-off journal. CG is not just good - using it is analogous to plundering gold, silver, and jewels. Praise God from Whom all blessings flow. Amen. Here endeth the lesson.

Ditto the Mueller/Gurgle theses on the ministry. Once again the ELS clergy and laity rolled over and played dead. Are they the same group that stood up to the LMCS long ago? Obviously not. Emboldened, Pope John the Malefactor extended the Left Foot of Fellowship to anyone who dared to question Him (the divine pronoun used on purpose). I do not agree with Rolf's curious doctrine, but what Pope John did to Rolf's congregation was despicable: fire the pastor or get kicked out of the Little Sect.  Moldstad, who was voted into the VP slot by the WELSian faction, has no aptitude for theology. As John Shep predicted long before it happened, Moldstad's attitude was and is - "Walk the plank."

Enthusiasm and compromise have contributed to the the neutering of the ELS. Perhaps the clergy have taken this verse to heart - and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. (Matthew 19:12)

I am pessimistic that Rolf Preus, Jay Webber, and others can ever admit to the error of UOJ, even as they contradict themselves in public and in private. If the Word does consecrate and Church Growth is evil, as Jay Webber seems to say, then UOJ is simply a third cancerous growth of Enthusiasm.

If one cannot divorce the ministry of the Word from the office, as Rolf did say on LQ (sic), quoted above, then UOJ is impossible.

One layman was struck by Kurtzahn and Preus looking down their noses at Lenski. This layman wrote:
"Just reading posts on the big I. I wonder what these guys do not like about Lenski`s comments about justification. What good does all Christ did for us without faith? Seems these guys do not want anything to do with faith and keep going on about the predestination controversy of the 1880`s. Also seems these are the same guys that promote the church growth stuff. I guess these guys make disciples."

In the past, the WELS pastors from the Bethany program seemed to have a much better grasp of Lutheran doctrine than did the pure-bred Wisconsin parochial school to NW prep to NWC to GA to Mequon students. Bethany program vet Dom Perignon Patterson is an exception, but I am told he started out well.

The only solution I can see for the ELS/WELS is having a multi-year, in-depth study of the Book of Concord. The Confessions are best studied in small sections, so they do not overwhelm people. I would start with the Formula of Concord (1580), since it constantly appeals to and uses the Augsburg Confession (1530) as its authority. I also like the Formula because of the issues addressed. Augsburg was more concerned with Rome. Fifty years later, Reformed influence also emerged as significant. Reformed doctrine is the biggest problem in the ELS and WELS today, especially since the leaders, past and present, are so smitten by it.

The major weakness of the Formula is quoting Luther. The conservative synods do not like Luther being quoted. That may kill any project involving the Formula of Concord.


The Wolf Demonstrates Schwaermer Homiletics





And I'll huff and and I'll puff and I'll...



 

BLOW YOUR HOUSE DOWN!



Do you also find it difficult to believe that anyone wants to clone Craig Groeschel?

The Dirt Conference was organized so people could learn the tricks of kelming Groeschel and other Reformed/Babtist fanatics. Groeschel appears to be Methodist/Disciples, according to his original ordination and his seminary training. In other words, he comes from the extreme Left of all denominations. His Life Church doctrine is posted here.

I use Google to track plagiarism in college classes, so I use it for doctrinal statements as well. I have made some comparisons before and posted them. I am struck by how closely the WELS Church and Change congregations match doctrinal statements with Groeschel and Evangelical Covenant churches.

Long ago various Lutheran writers warned pastors not to imitate the pulpit gimmicks of the Reformed. That is still a good idea.




Friday, November 27, 2009

Here Is the Dirt on The Dirt Conference





Isn't it time for Ski and Bishop Katie to be at another schwaermer conference?

I checked and found out they were not too far away, at Little Rock, for The Dirt Conference. They still advertise Dirt, and it was over several weeks ago.

I linked it, as always, so the Mequon, New Ulm, and WLC students can look up the information.

The idea is to learn how these Emergent Church types emerge, so newbies can figure out how to copy them without soiling themselves:


Lifechurch.tv - Copying started a long time ago at The CORE - free downloads from Groeschel!
Church of the Highlands
Gateway Church
Seacoast Church

New Life Church
Healing Place Church
The Life Church of Memphis
C3 Church
Bayside Community Church
Celebration Church, TX
Newspring Church

Bishop Katie wrote: "11/16/09 - Brought To You By The Letter Y
Call it venting. Call it a rant. Call it “up on my soapbox” if you want. But, I have something I need to get off my chest, an observation I made last week at the Dirt Conference and realized is true for us most of the time."

Before the Dirt Conference was a story conference. I believe Ski and Katie have already gone to more conferences than I have in my entire life.

Ski must be recovering because he has not blogged since July.

I would write more, but most of The CORE websty is restricted to MEMBERS ONLY. That means only 15 or so people on the entire planet can read the good stuff.


Get a large mirror. Practice sermon drama with Craig Groeschel, Life TV.
---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Here Is the Dirt on The Dirt Conference":

So, Ski attends all these "conferences" that are outside of fellowship. The Core websty ain't cha(sic - GJ - her sic) average WELS church blog. There are no pictures of Luther. The web designer could have, at the very least, included a lamb.(No, can't do that, might make the Core look too spiritual.) Why, tell me why, has Ski not been stripped of his pastoral duties? My pastor has stated that worshiping with the Baptists is wrong!

In Christ,
from WELS church lady

***

GJ - How could they extend the Left Foot of Fellowship when David Valleskey called it "spoiling the Egyptians"? The Ohio Conference endorsed Valleskey's odious paper and WLQ (aka The Popes Speak) published it as the latest revelation from God the Holy Spirit. The blog is still active where Ski bragged about how he worshiped awesomely with Andy Stanley.

Do not forget - the Appleton Dumbling gang is still tolerating this circus. I imagine a pastor or two objects, but Fox Valley remains the navel of the Shrinkage Movement in WELS.




The CORE is endorsed by DP Engelbrecht, guardian of pure doctrine in Northern Wisconsin.
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"  - Juvenal.
Who watches the watchmen?


---

JR has left a new comment on your post "Here Is the Dirt on The Dirt Conference":

Not to mention that we're still waiting for that verdict on Jeske and the RSO status for Time of Grace.

I know finances are rough, but shouldn't these things be our synod's top priority?

***

GJ - The jury--his Doctrinal Pussycat--has returned a verdict: "Not guilty by reason of being fifth generation WELS."


The Jury


Global Warming Collection at the Finkelsteinery




 Here is the link to Freddy, also linked on the left column.


Kurtzahn, The Pancake Pope of the CLC (sic), Unloads on Lenski



Found on e-Bay. If you stare at this IHOP stack of pancakes long enough, an image of Steve Kurtzahn appears. Some call it a miracle, but others want their money back.




Steven Kurtzahn, WELS/CLC/WELS


Pooled Ignorance from LutherQuest (sic)

Dick Rockenbach (Drock)
Senior Member
Username: Drock

Posted on Friday, November 27, 2009 - 6:57 am: 
http://www.logos.com/products/details/3910
do any of you folks have this? Like it?
What weaknesses does Lenski have?


Pr Rolf David Preus (Rolf)
Senior Member
Username: Rolf

Post Number: 4141
Registered: 5-2001

Posted on Friday, November 27, 2009 - 7:29 am: 
Lenksi denies objective justification and teaches election in view of faith.


Rev. Stephen Kurtzahn (Hville79)
Intermediate Member
Username: Hville79

Post Number: 320
Registered: 6-2008

Posted on Friday, November 27, 2009 - 12:05 pm:
I would recommend Lenski, having used him from seminary days, but with the caveats Pastor Preus mentions. Those who have followed Lenski in totality have really gotten themselves messed up in these two areas--just look at what's his name over at Ichabod.

Lenski has some very good insights into the Greek that I have utilized often in my sermon work. But what I find interesting is how he will often disagree with Synodical Conference exegetes. In working through a text in the Gospels, for example, I find that he will often take an approach just the opposite of Ylvisaker or Kretzmann (who really mirrors Stoeckhardt). He doesn't mention the SC guys by name, but he explains their exegesis clearly--and then disagrees with it. There are times when I do go with Lenski because he makes more sense with the Greek. But there have also been times I've thought he's way off.

Overall, if you're looking to purchase Lenski, I think it would be a good investment that you will use for years to come.


***


GJ - I do not know which guy is funnier - Rolf cannot comprehend the book he supposedly edited - Justification and Rome.


Kurtzahn was so bad in the CLC that David Menton did not want to be in the same room with him. Ask Kurtzahn about the sin of eating pancakes on Shrove Tuesday, or whether incest is a sin. The first one is a crucial theological matter. The second is an adiaphoron.

Kurtzahn is a good example of someone who flips for career advantage. Here is an earlier letter, from Kurtzahn.1, before he become Kurtzahn.2 and Kurtzahn.3.

[GJ - Pastor Steve Kurtzahn wrote this letter April 30, 1996, when he was a circuit pastor in the CLC (sic). The letter is written to CLC Pastor Paul Tiefel, who shares the same grandfather and nickname (Teufel) as Mequon Professor James P. Tiefel. Paul Tiefel did not enjoy my CN  review of Valleskey's disastrous Church Growth textbook.]


St. Paul's Evangelical Lutheran Church
Church of the Lutheran Confession (CLC)
2100 Sixteenth Street South West
Austin, Minniesota 55912
507-433-8191


April 30, 1996

Pastor Paul Tiefel
2015 N. Hastings Way
Eau Claire, WI 54703

This is in response to your April 27th letter.

First, let me say that when you phoned me you wanted to know what problems I had with Valleskey's book. You also mentioned on the phone that you felt Greg Jackson broke the Eighth Commandment.

It is because of the accusation you made on the phone against Greg that I spent so mujch space in my letter speaking of the review. You were the one who brought it up on the phone with me. Now you want to discuss it "only with Jackson's approval?" Let me repeat myself, Paul : I see no instance how or where Greg did such a thing as break the Eighth Commandment. [emphasis in original]

It is very disturbing that you and [David ] Koenig speak to false teachers in other church bodies like Valleskey, [James] Tiefel and Harstad (sp?) concerning the truthfulness of what Greg Jackson writes. Since when do you think they will agree with Greg? He has laid bare in the past few years the fact that many in the WELS and the ELS were Church-Growth oriented. Do you honestly think they would corroborate Greg's statements after that?

Allow me to make an analogy. Think back to the formative days of the CLC. What if you or Dave were on the floor of the WELS conventions back in the 1950's when it disregarded Romans 16:17, 18. Would you have gone to O. J. Naumann or Carl Lawrenz to see if Edmund Reim or Egbert Schoaller or C. M. Gullerrud were telling the truth concerning the error of the WELS/ELS? What do you think the response would have been if you had asked them, "Is Reim (or Schaller or Gullerud) telling the truth?"

When it comes to my pointing out the false doctrine of David Valleskey, Paul, it needs to be said that a false teacher can be recognized not just by blatant and clear statements of falsehood, like you are searching for when it comes to his book. But a false teacher can also be recognized when does NOT say something that he should, or when he says something in a confusing manner, or even when his writings exude a false spirit. For example, a person can be classified as a legalist and still say all the right words. But you know he's a legalist by the way he says these them or by what he does not say. Going back to the 1930's and 40's, particularly with the "Statement of the 44," many recognized that something was going terribly wrong in the Missouri Synod, but no one could really put a finger on the problem until after the fact. There are many things in the "Statement" that you and I could also p;robably have agreed with, but looking back upon that history we recognize now that there was an underlying liberal agenda being carried out in the LC-MS. Hindsight is always 20-20.

Getting back to Valleskey's book:

1. Unless I missed it somewhere, does Valleskey repudiate the Church Growth Movement taught by Fuller Theological Seminary by name? If he does, show me the page number.

2. On pages 199 through 204 Valleskey deals with the so-called "Seeker Service." He goes into a tremendous amount of detail about how Seeker Services are done. He raises many good questions that Lutherans should ask themselves before they become involved in such Seeker Services. But if Seeker Services are dangerous by trivializing and by even ignoring the Means of Grace, why does he leave the door cracked open by saying on page 204, "Althought it must be said that congregations may in Christian freedom utilize at least certain features of this outreach method..."

3. On page 201 Valleskey states, "The gospel is proclaimed at the Seeker Service, but not as a means by which the Spirit miraculously draws people into the church..." From what I have read from many different sources in the past and from what I have seen on television documentiaries, the Gospel of Holy Scripture is NOT proclaimed at many, if not most, of these Seeker Services. So why does Valleskey say, "The gospel is proclaimed..."?

4. On page 174, Valleskey quotes Joseph Aldrich approvingly. Where in the quote is there mention of the Means of Grace? The quote sounds very Reformed ot me ("He desire to build into you and me the beauty of his own character, and then put us on display...").

5. On pages 237 and 238 Valleskey speaks of the role of women in evangelism. I felt very uncomfortable with the two paragraphs because he is making a distinction between evangelism calling "in the name of and on behalf of the congregation" (p. 27, fifith line from the bottom) and "the ministry of the gospel conducted in the name of and on behalf of the congregation" (p. 238, fifth line from the top). Why would he make such an artificial distinction? Why would he also make the contrast in the statement "They go out, not as one with authority over the man, but as ones with a message to share"? Why would a man with his seeming intellectual prowess resort to such confusing language? WHAT IS HIS UNDERLYING MOTIVE? Are these paragraphs laying the groundwork for some new revelations to come out of the WELS in the future in connection with the role of women in the church? These are very legitimate questions we should all be asking!

When I read Chapter Five, beginning on page 213, I thought I was back working at the brokerage firm in Milwaukee, sitting at the feet of motivational speakers who were using Napoleon Hill's Think and Grow Rich. These concepts of planning, mission statements, etc. the Church Growth people at Fuller lifted right out of the business world and have applied to the church. All sorts of companies have mission statements today. I've seen them in the lobbies of hospitals and in many other public places. But the Church has its "mission statement" in Matthew 28:18-20. There is no need for a new one!

On pages 217 ff. Valleskey speaks of the value of a mission statement. He shows what happens "without a clear sense of mission" and he shows what can happen "with a clear sense of mission." Paul, take a very close look at Valleskey's points. [emphasis in original] All of this is being stated on the basis of A MISSION STATEMENT rather than on the basis of THE MEANS OF GRACE, THE GOSPEL IN WORD AND SACRAMENTS.

On page 221, Valleskey speaks of "congregational self-study." At the end of that first paragraph under step two he speaks of "a community profile." We used to refer to such activity as the canvass, so we could find out what neighborhood families are unchurched so we could share the simple Word with them. The Church Growth people speak of such "community profiles" so they can fill the "felt needs" of an area. From the way Valleskey is writing it woudl eappear that he is again going the Church Growth route. If he's not, why doesn't he make himself clear?

Valleskey speaks a lot about goals, action plans, policies and procedures, etc. Note the comment in the middle of page 225, "It is good for a congregation, and likewise its boards and committees, to ask and answer the question, 'Where would we like to be, under God, five years from now?' and then begin to take specific steps to achieve that goal.'"

The reason the CG people like such statements is that many times their goal is an increase in church membership. It is true, Valleskey warns about this on page 224, "A part of the goal, however, cannot be that as a result of this concerted effort, X number of people will be brought to faith and fellowship hurch." But then why does he spend so much time talking about it? Why do we need action plans, goals, etc. to figure out where we would like to be five years from now? The answer from every confessional Lutheran congregation should be: Five years from now we pray that we will continue proclaiming the Word of God in its truth and purity and administering the Sacraments as Christ instituted them. Period. [emphasis in original] Valleskey is lifting all of this stuff from the CG literature and interspercing comments such as the one on page 224 to salve the consciences of those who are still concerned about being faithful to the Word.

On page 230 in his example of developing policies and procedures, objective 1 is described as "To develop and maintain an evangelism awareness in our congregation." NOtice how this objective is to be implemented: articles (what should be in them?), greeter teams, adopt-a-goal, maintain tract rack (whould kind of tracts?), promote an evangelism Sunday, etc. All of these man-made methods are listed, but where in the world is there any mention of the faithful proclaimation of Law and Gospel? That is how true Scriptural evangelism awareness is developed and maintained.

Greg has already spoke of the differences in exegesis on Matthew 28 in his review, and how Valleskey is inconsistent in that regard.

There are other examples I could probably offer, but the above should suffice.

Paul, there are good things in Valleskey's book. I also learned when I read it. There are some good common sense suggestions in the second part of the book. But as you can see from the above references, ever so slyly, like a wolf in sheep's clothing, Valleskey is promoting the Church Growth Movement. [emphasis in original] I will argue that with anyone. God forbid, but my guess would be the next such book out of WELS will be even more CG oriented and even more blatant in its CG statements.

I hope this will finally put to rest the discord, mistrust and animosity this book has caused among brethren.

In His service,

Steve

Stephen C. F. Kurtzahn

cc: [CLC President] Dan Fleischer, [current world missionary] Dave Koenig


***

GJ - Does anyone wonder why I put (sic) after the Church of the Lutheran Confession (sic) ?


Under Construction





The Church From Old Scratch websty is under construction.

Public service announcement from Ichabod World Headquarters.


Pigs cannot fly very far.

They Do Sound Like Parlow, Ski, Jeske, Valleskey, Huebner, and Kelm




Dom Perignon Patterson caught a big one.
Gurgle helped him reel it in.


Guilty As Charged: Quotes from the Eco-Fraudsters
various ecocriminals

Posted on Thursday, November 26, 2009 1:32:27 PM by reasonisfaith

"No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits.... Climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world." Christine Stewart, Canadian Minister of the Environment in a quote from the Calgary Herald

"Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing -- in terms of economic policy and environmental policy." Tim Wirth , while U.S. Senator, Colorado. After a short stint as United Nations Under-Secretary for Global Affairs. Served as President, U.N. Foundation, created by Ted Turner and his $1 billion "gift"

"On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but - which means that we must include all the doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands, and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we'd like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climatic change. To do that we need to get some broadbased support, to capture the public's imagination. That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This 'double ethical bind' we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both." Steven Schneider, Climatologist, Stanford University. Quoted in Discover, pp. 45-48, Oct. 1989; see also (Dixy Lee Ray in 'Trashing the Planet', 1990) and (American Physical Society, APS News August/September 1996).

“A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system (especially patterns of consumption) into line with the realities of ecology and the world resource situation.” Paul Ehrlich and Anne H. Ehrlich, “Population, Resources, Environment” (W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1970, 323) This quote has also been attributed to John Holdren, Erlich's co-author, who now works with Obama in the White House.

“People are the cause of all the problems; we have too many of them; we need to get rid of some of them, and this (ban of DDT) is as good a way as any.” Charles Wurster, Environmental Defense Fund.

“We can and should seize upon the energy crisis as a good excuse and great opportunity for making some very fundamental changes that we should be making anyhow for other reasons.” — Russell Train (EPA Administrator at the time, and soon thereafter became head of the World Wildlife Fund), Science 184 p. 1050, 7 June 1974 "Scientists who want to attract attention to themselves, who want to attract great funding to themselves, have to (find a) way to scare the public ... and this you can achieve only by making things bigger and more dangerous than they really are." Petr Chylek (Professor of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia) Commenting on reports by other researchers that Greenland's glaciers are melting. (Halifax Chronicle-Herald, August 22, 2001)

“The world has a cancer, and that cancer is man”. Alan Gregg, former longtime official of the Rockerfeller Foundation

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialised civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” Maurice Strong, head of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro and Executive Officer for Reform in the Office of the Secretary General of the United Nations.

“Man is always and everywhere a blight on the landscape.” John Muir, founder of the Sierra Club

“Phasing out the human race will solve every problem on earth, social and environmental.” Dave Foreman, Earth First! and Sierra Club director (1995-1997)


Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi - Recessional Lutherans Will Leave





Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi - literally means law of praying, law of believing, law of living. The phrase is often translated as "The way we worship is the the way we believe and the way we live." Often only the first four words in Latin are used, but the last two are especially fitting when applied to the Shrinkers in Lutherdom. They leave behind them - lawsuits, divorce decrees, and ruined congregations. They are stealth exterminators.

Architecture always reflects faith and worship.
  1. Roman Catholic churches feature elaborate altars and diminished pulpits, because they feature the abomination of the Mass, a priest's unbloody sacrifice of Christ to reduce one's time in Purgatory.
  2. Babtist churches feature a wading pool, inside or out, because they are stuck on immersion. Altars are minimal because they have ordinances, but no Sacraments. Non-Lutheran Protestants have baptismal fonts.
  3. Pentecostals replace altars and pulpits with stages, to feature their amateur bands and singing artists. Others have followed this trend, which has degenerated to entertaining and snacking people at movie theaters.
  4. Confessional Lutherans balance the altar and font with the pulpit, to emphasize Word and Sacrament. One does not overwhelm the other.
The WELS Shrinkers, following their peers in ELCA and Missouri, began by ditching the name Lutheran. I saw this circus being acted out in Columbus, with Stolzenburg, Kuske, and Zehms in charge. Laity saw it as dishonest at the very least. The Ohio Conference and Michigan District had a chance to fight this in the open, as I did. They chose to clam up and list "Pilgrim Community Church" on the roster so someone could ask about it on the floor of the district meeting. Kuske's answer was, "That shouldn't be there." That was it. The Doctrinal Pussycat Robert Mueller and VP Kuske also got CrossRoads started, same agenda. Pilgrim foundered on the rock of indifference, while CrossRoads finally turned honest and became Evangelical Covenant.


In their ignorance, Pilgrim and CrossRoads both stumbled onto well known denominational trademarks, in the name of avoiding the denominational stigmata. Under the toxic tutelage of Kelm, Valleskey, Bivens, Mark Jeske, James Huebner, and Wayne Mueller, WELS abandoned the name Lutheran with alacrity and without remorse: the hymnal, magazine, Lutherans for Life, and congregational names. They kept saying, as Kuske did, "We can leave out the name Lutheran," but no one wanted to ask why they itched to do so. The faux-answer was, "So we can grow faster."


The real answer was Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. They did not trust in the efficacy of the Word and Sacraments, so they saw name Lutheran as a barrier to becoming generic Protestants. These jokers have advertised their lack of faith, through their Sunday services, for decades. They consciously avoid the liturgy and hymnals while featuring entertainment and half-baked musical performances. Sound systems get them excited. Holy Communion is avoided entirely. Ski/Glende's The CORE, Jeff Gunn's CrossWalk are typical.


WLC Board Member Gunn gives cogent reasons for attending his sect: food, casual dress, friendliness, and relevance. Not content to compete with the club scene, they covet the restaurant and bagel business as well.


What do these Shriners read and where do they go for spiritual edification? They love CG books and recommend them to gullible members. Valleskey suggested a string of CG textbooks in The Northwestern Lutheran and still became The Sausage Factory president. Kelm, Jim Huebner, and Olson made careers out of promoting Reformed doctrine. In the foulness of time, Mark Jeske appeared, with an excellent chance to make an unknown name well known through TV. He did the opposite. No one can tell he is Lutheran or WELS (or Missouri) from his edu-tainment shows. His cronies are the worst of the anti-Lutheran clergy in WELS. Ski's monthly need for Schwaermer conferences (with Glende and Bishop Katie in tow) are testimony to Jeske's influence. Ditto Patterson and his fondness for Exponential.


The Jeske-Parlow-Kelm style of worship will lead them out of WELS, perhaps to Missouri, but ultimately to a non-Lutheran sect. Parlow and Kelm are already ministerial members of Willow Creek Community Church (no discipline from DP Engelbrecht). I predict that Willow Creek will be the ultimate destination for many. Jerry Kieschnick could create a non-geographical district for WELS exiles. They would be allowed to eat tiger meat and continue secret GA hazing routines.


Marc Schroeder (LCMS, not the SP) had an assistant when they were both still WELS. The assistant gave a sermon where he said people had to make a decision for Christ. Soon the assistant was in the LCMS, followed by Marc. The assistant then joined the Babtists. Lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi. The men who slavishly copy Reformed sermons and Sneaker Services will not remain nominal Lutherans because they are anti-Lutheran in thought, word, and deed. They were able to move WELS into their orbit by leading Mischke and Gurgle around, but everyone finally woke up when they found the accounts empty (lex vivendi). Church and Change was more effective when they operated secretly.


What do the Chicaneries stand for? Read about their conference materials, the leaders they adore, the books they read, the conferences they attend, the fellow Shrinkers they promote, the grants and subsidies they grab.


The Shrinkers have picked a bad time to strand themselves. Dubai's financial meltdown has spooked money markets and made people wonder, "If an oil-soaked kingdom is in trouble, where will the rest of the countries go?" The Shrinkers do not depend on their own success but the prosperity of others. This is old stuff for Lutheran church historians. The 19th century anti-confessional Lutheran churches (with their own anti-confessional synods) became United Church of Christ congregations, if they survived at all.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi - Recessiona...":

It must be "nice" to be an independent Lutheran Pastor- then you never have to be challenged by what your colleagues say or do, you can just throw brick bats at everyone else who is not as enlightened as oneself. (Actually, it seems pretty lacking in courage)

***

GJ - It is even better to indulge in anonymous name-calling.





Thursday, November 26, 2009

Fuller Fraud Resembles Global Warming Statistics




I joined WELS and all I got was this crummy sweatshirt.


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Man-Made Global Warming Proven":

Hi Dr. Jackson,

Did you notice the similarity between ClimateGate and Church GrowthGate? Turns out the climatologists were massaging the numbers, and adding in false data, while the Church Growth-ologists touted bigger, better attended mall-like churches. Yet, over time they finally had to admit that they hardly converted anyone to Christianity, and once the ready supply of sheep to sheep-steal from the long-established alphabet soup of denominations became a trickle, their growth stagnated and in many cases reversed. Hence, the church growthers are rightly called church shrinkers.

I have noticed.

Here is the latest from Australia, and their version of the fraudulent Cap and Trade Double Energy Costs Tax. American Spectator has this.

For those who have missed the scientific scandal of all time - the global warming scientists have been exposed in England and New Zealand for faking data while blackballing any scientist with legitimate complaints about their methods and "facts." I knew that man-made global warming was invented to generate millions for "research" and billions for "carbon credits." Wowee - those carbon credits are just like those YoVille gifts people buy with real money on Facebook. Yes, people are paying for pixels with YoVille, so they should love buying carbon credits for a non-existing problem.

Back to the main theme - the Church Shrinkers have been running their Ponzi scheme for decades. The worse they do, the more they want to claim for themselves. St. Paul in German Village (Columbus, Ohio) had a variety of Shrinkers: Floyd Luther Stolzenburg, Roger Zehms, Bob Schumann, and Mike Nitz. Schumann envisioned 8,000 communicants and a world-famous parking valet ministry. (If you think any of my posts are humorous, just imagine the how much material I have to work with. I could do three blogs on Columbus alone.)

Mrs. Ichabod, upon hearing about this Schumann vision thing, asked at the time, "What if Marc Schroeder (now LCMS) has the same plan? Where will they get all these communicants?" Schumann is a Jungkuntz relative, and I trace the whole CG gang in WELS to Jungkuntz teaching at Northwestern College. Zehms, choking up, called Jungkuntz the best teacher he ever had. Zehms is now a member at St. Marcus, Milwaukee.

Where was I? What did CG do for St. Paul in German Village? It should be its own denomination by now, but the congregation did not prosper under the tutelage of so many gurus.

The comparisons are so obvious. The globaloney experts worked overtime to silence anyone who doubted their man-made global warming scare tactics.

WELS, Missouri, the Little Sect on the Prairie, ELCA, and the CLC (sic) have all pursued training in CG while idolizing the Fuller apostates. These thugs have worked together secretly, knowing each other's identity, yet denying their study at Fuller, their support of cheesey Reformed doctrine, and their looting of synod funds for their own destructive projects.

Do they work together to suppress dissent from their Church Shrinkerage? I have given many examples in the past. The clergy are afraid of their wrath. Like the ongoing GA hazing at Mequon, the denials work because so many participate in lying.

Calling me a liar, Valleskey and Bivens have denied going to Fuller Seminary and yet both have admitted it. Waldo Werning admitted his Fuller study to me, denied it later, and flew into a rage when I pointed out that I wrote down his admission on that day in my Day-Timer. I made it a habit to take notes when Shrinkers talked because they consistently denied ever saying what I wrote down. Later, Werning was proud to get a blue ribbon or Happy Meal or some other award from Fuller for selling their product so vigorously. That suggests he did go there.

Rich Krause defended Larry Olson (DMin, Fuller), without mentioning that he (as circuit pastor and conference chairman!) was doing an unionistic DMin with Larry Oh! as his supervisor. Rich and Larry call themselves "Dr." now - for the equivalent of a very weak STM degree.

All the synods have promoted and defended those men who have done their best to destroy Lutheran doctrine. Just as the scientists are against honest science, these Shrinkers are against their own doctrine. Fuller has trained men and women to subvert and undermine the confessions of all denominations - not just Lutherans. They are united by their disbelief in the Word - and proud of it. Our Staph Infection (Larry Oh!) bragged that more Lutherans went to Fuller than to synodical schools.

The Shrinkers also have their fake statistics. They highlight a few congregations where someone has succeeded in being non-Lutheran, vaguely Christian, and very entertaining - yielding a bumper crop of transfers from other congregations. Long ago, Reuel Schulz' man, C. Ponzi Wagner, admitted that "CG principles do not work." Has that fact--from their top defrauder--affected their ardor? Not at all.

I found a graphic in the WELS Perish Services presentation. The figures were for a "turnaround church," before and after. Very impressive - and faked. It showed what could happen. What a joke. When someone else was using WELS statistics, he got a call from Gurgle himself, asking where the information came from. (Implied accusation - you working with Name Him Not.) He answered, "From the WELS statistical report." Astonishing that all these statistics experts never stopped to analyze their own.

Several computers ago, I devised actual Excel graphs showing how WELS had started shrinking under CG, with The Love Shack staff growing each year. WELS supplied the statistics from their annual "Book of Sins." The Shrinkers strangled the schools, promoting their expensive programs and hiring additional buddies to lobby for more programs and hire more parasites at 2929. The trend lines were obvious - membership steadily downward, staff hires steadily upward, schools gradually defunded. And yet the conventions kept voting for these anti-Lutheran clowns.

Gurgle left office, suddenly, when the money gaps became too obvious to be explained or blamed away.

The Global Warming fanatics are already pushing their talking points. Ed Begley went Werning on Fox, yelling "peer reviews" and shouting down the interviewer. There is no known serious reaction to the scandal so far. Blogs will help get the word past the watchful dragons of the mainstream media.

The Shrinkers are so deceptive that they deny CG exists, yet they have their own private club in WELS to promote CG - Church and Change, started with WELS money, with offshoots to promote more of the same. The Shrinkers are not volunteers working in their spare time. No, they are on the synod dole - mission counselors and parish assistants and seminary professors.

Church and Change has its own listserve, which I repost every so often - to their howls of dismay. They do not need their own magazine, because the submissive WELS members pay for FIC to be used as the Xerox room of Church and Change. The regular contributors to FIC are the founders and leaders of Church and Change:
  1. Kissin' Jim Aderman
  2. Fuller Bivens
  3. Dom Perignon Patterson
  4. Peter Pan-denominational
  5. Paul Calvin Kelm
  6. Randy Latte Hunter
  7. James Mattek
  8. David Figs-from-Thistles Valleskey
  9. His Grace, Mark Jeske
  10. Wayne--no CG in WELS--Mueller.
FIC somehow manages to publish gushing articles about the favored CG experiments of the moment. The Sausage Factory has been CG for decades now, with Mary Lou College preparing the students for Reformed doctrine and homoerotic film production. WLC is not exactly a confessional alternative, since Church and Change started at Ecole de Schwan, "Our Valpo". WLC is so confessional (from a Fuller perspective) that they got their new president from a non-WELS congregation, CrossWalk in Phoenix, plus two board members. Has anyone heard of a tiny, failing non-WELS congregation getting three people in leadership roles at the same college? They were even trying to get Jeff Gunn a gig at WLC, but that was nixed. Church and Change used to brag that Gunn's anti-Lutheran entertainment center was "blessed," so they featured him at their conferences. The only way people get at the truth is by sending information to Ichabod and seeing it published for commentary. Chicanery commentary is obscene, abusive, crude, insulting, and especially motivating for me. The canons of decency prevent me from publishing most of it, but the daily volume proves regularly albeit joyless reading of the facts. Science is supposed to rely on pure research and the facts, but that has been subverted by a well organized group of greedy, self-serving people. The same can be said for Lutherans. Everyone wanted to be handed a neat formula they could repeat while feeling good about themselves:
  1. The pastor and congregation must want to grow.
  2. God wants His church to grow. God needs massive amounts of money to make this happen. He is depending on you.
  3. Numerical growth is good, by whatever means necessary--short of sin, and actual work, of course.
  4. Cell groups are absolutely necessary for growth.
  5. Pipe organs are bad, bad, and pit orchestras are good, good.
  6. The liturgy is bad, bad, but bad dancing and lame drama are good, good.
  7. Hymns hurt growth, but peppy songs help growth.
  8. Creeds and sermons are bad - so are church buildings.
  9. Movie theaters are way cool. Offer treats before and during, for belly-servers.
  10. Ministers should dress like they are going to change the oil in their cars afterwards.
These strange new insights, recycled endlessly, have devastated the institutions they propose to save. Why is no one shocked, or laughing, or marching to headquarters with burning torches and waving pitchforks?

Jim Aderman asked, "Have you ever kissed a frog?"
Absurdity is no barrier to publishing in FIC.
Aderman helped found the Chicaneries and gets paid to promote CG in FIC. Neat.


Anonymous
has left a new comment on your post "Fuller Fraud Resembles Global Warming Statistics":

WELS really sowed the seeds of confusion when it conflated CG with exhortations to amend one’s own behavior to serve the needs of WELS. The dissonance with the Word of God alone was enough to drive away followers.

***

GJ - The exhortations may have laid claim to helping Holy Mother Synod, but they betrayed a real hatred for Lutheran doctrine and worship. I will dedicate a new post to that reality.

Thanks for Our Military, Past and Present






During this Thanksgiving season I want to express our family's gratitude for our military people. By that I mean current and past military, plus their extended families. Everyone in the family serves our country when someone is in uniform.

Our soldiers are the best and bravest, and they are known for their kindness throughout the world. In Germany, at the end of WWII, people said, "Get as close to the Americans as possible. You want to be captured by them, not the others."

Man-Made Global Warming Proven


James Delingpole

James Delingpole is a writer, journalist and broadcaster who is right about everything. He is the author of numerous fantastically entertaining books including Welcome To Obamaland: I've Seen Your Future And It Doesn't Work, How To Be Right, and the Coward series of WWII adventure novels. His website is www.jamesdelingpole.com

 



Wow! The scandal just gets juicier and juicier. Now it seems that the Kiwis may have been at it too – tinkering with raw data to make “Global Warming” look scarier than it really is. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That; Ian Wishart)

The alleged villains this time are the climate scientists at the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NiWA) – New Zealand’s answer to Britain’s Climate Research Unit. And to judge by this news alert by the Climate Science Coalition of NZ, both institutions share a similarly laissez-faire attitude to scientific accuracy.
Compare and contrast these two graphs and you’ll see .
Kiwigraph1
This is the graph from NiWA’s website, showing mean annual temperature over New Zealand from 1853. Note the dotted straight line showing the upward trend. Worrying, isn’t it? Almost enough to make you fall in love your flickery, yellowy new eco-light bulbs, recycle your kids and commit yourself to a binding agreement at Copenhagen.

Now have a look at this analysis of the raw data taken from exactly the same temperature stations.
Kiwigraph2
Can you see the difference? I can – and I know as little about science as Al Gore. But lets allow the experts at Climate Science Coalition of NZ to explain:

Straight away you can see there’s no slope—either up or down. The temperatures are remarkably constant way back to the 1850s. Of course, the temperature still varies from year to year, but the trend stays level—statistically insignificant at 0.06°C per century since 1850.
Putting these two graphs side by side, you can see huge differences. What is going on?
Why does NIWA’s graph show strong warming, but graphing their own raw data looks completely different? Their graph shows warming, but the actual temperature readings show none whatsoever!

Have the readings in the official NIWA graph been adjusted?
It is relatively easy to find out. We compared raw data for each station (from NIWA’s web site) with the adjusted official data, which we obtained from one of Dr Salinger’s colleagues.
Requests for this information from Dr Salinger himself over the years, by different scientists, have long gone unanswered, but now we might discover the truth.

Proof of man-made warming
What did we find? First, the station histories are unremarkable. There are no reasons for any large corrections. But we were astonished to find that strong adjustments have indeed been made.

About half the adjustments actually created a warming trend where none existed; the other half greatly exaggerated existing warming. All the adjustments increased or even created a warming trend, with only one (Dunedin) going the other way and slightly reducing the original trend.
The shocking truth is that the oldest readings have been cranked way down and later readings artificially lifted to give a false impression of warming, as documented below. There is nothing in the station histories to warrant these adjustments and to date Dr Salinger and NIWA have not revealed why they did this.

One station, Hokitika, had its early temperatures reduced by a huge 1.3°C, creating strong warming from a mild cooling, yet there’s no apparent reason for it.
We have discovered that the warming in New Zealand over the past 156 years was indeed man-made, but it had nothing to do with emissions of CO2—it was created by man-made adjustments of the temperature. It’s a disgrace.
NIWA claim their official graph reveals a rising trend of 0.92ºC per century, which means (they claim) we warmed more than the rest of the globe, for according to the IPCC, global warming over the 20th century was only about 0.6°C.

NIWA has since issued a press release, denying it has manipulated any data. And claiming:
Warming over New Zealand through the past is unequivocal.
However, at his excellent site the Briefing Room Ian Wishart – author of Air Con: The Seriously Inconvenient Truth About Global Warming – points out the striking similarities with the CRU scandal.
Manipulation of raw data is at the heart of recent claims of corrupt scientific practice in climate science, with CRU’s Phil Jones recently claiming old temperature records collected by his organization were “destroyed” or “lost”, meaning researchers can now only access manipulated data.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Thanksgiving Week at The CORE




Tuesday - Christmas Parade viewing. Popcorn provided, I hope.

Wednesday - Thanksgiving service at the St. Peter campus in Freedom.

Thursday - Thanksgiving service at the St. Peter campus in Freedom.

I want to put the best construction on this White Elephant, but why is this glorious, do-anything-short-of-sin-to-reach-everyone mission NOT having a Thanksgiving service? Is it because, shorn of its cheerleaders from local WELS churches, The CORE would flop when competing mano-a-mano?

Thanksgiving Eve Service







Thanksgiving, 2009

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

Bethany Lutheran Worship, 6 PM Central

The Hymn # 558 All Praise to Thee 4.44
The Order of Vespers p. 41
The Psalmody Psalm 100 p. 144
The First Lection 1 Timothy 2:1-8
The Second Lection Luke 17:11-19
The Sermon Hymn # 574 Come Ye Thankful 4.9

Giving God Thanks

The Prayers and Lord’s Prayer p. 44
The Collect for Peace p. 45
The Benediction p. 45
The Hymn #361 O Jesus King 4.1

KJV 1 Timothy 2:1 I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; 2 For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; 4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time. 7 Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak the truth in Christ, and lie not;) a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity. 8 I will therefore that men pray every where, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting.

KJV Luke 17:11 And it came to pass, as he went to Jerusalem, that he passed through the midst of Samaria and Galilee. 12 And as he entered into a certain village, there met him ten men that were lepers, which stood afar off: 13 And they lifted up their voices, and said, Jesus, Master, have mercy on us. 14 And when he saw them, he said unto them, Go shew yourselves unto the priests. And it came to pass, that, as they went, they were cleansed. 15 And one of them, when he saw that he was healed, turned back, and with a loud voice glorified God, 16 And fell down on his face at his feet, giving him thanks: and he was a Samaritan. 17 And Jesus answering said, Were there not ten cleansed? but where are the nine? 18 There are not found that returned to give glory to God, save this stranger. 19 And he said unto him, Arise, go thy way: thy faith hath made thee whole.

Giving God Thanks

1 Timothy 2:3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; 4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.

Last Thanksgiving, few would have imagined that this country could go into this much of a decline, in every sense of the word. The suffering is almost universal, in spite of the happy-face efforts to say it is almost over.

That should make us reflect on our country’s origins, because the freedom and Christianity of our nation came from persecution and hardship.

The Pilgrims who came over on the Mayflower did not simply buy tickets and set sail, with the King of England waving goodbye at the dock. They had to sneak out of the country to have religious freedom. They left the women and children behind at the dock because of pursuit, then came back to get them. They suffered hardship in Holland before they finally left for America, a 67-day journey filled with storms, rogue waves, and utter misery. One man was washed overboard but grabbed a rope in time, and was finally hauled onto the deck. Later, while the ship was anchored, William Bradford’s wife fell overboard and drowned. Half the Pilgrims died in the first four months in Boston.

That was the hardship part. Persecution motivated them. England slowly moved toward the Protestant faith, starting with Henry VIII and his second wife, Ann Boleyn. Henry did not like dissent and burned Dr. Robert Barnes at the stake. His older daughter, Bloody Mary, murdered as many Protestants as possible, scattering many around Europe. His younger daughter Elizabeth, Ann Boleyn’s only surviving child, was a Protestant who tolerated the Catholics. Under King James I and the Stuarts (William I, II, etc), Catholicism was secretly promoted. North America was the last safe haven for Protestants, and sporadic persecution kept sending them across the Atlantic for the sake of freedom.

Few of us have known the hardship of one ocean voyage like that of the Mayflower and those ships that followed later. As Bradford said, when they landed, they had no one to greet them or help them. The Indians did cooperate, which kept them from starvation. There is a new kind of persecution at work today, based more on apathy and apostasy than old-fashioned burning at the stake and imprisonment. Apostates will not physically send others into exile, but they accomplish the same through nefarious means.

Paul’s apostolic work continued in the face of constant persecution, ending in prison and death. The Roman Empire considered the Christian faith another version of that troublesome tribe of Jews. The identification was not exactly wrong. Rome gladly went to war with many different nations, but they destroyed Jerusalem over religion. Other rebels had religious motivation, but the Jewish state and religion were almost identical, and that led to their city being surrounded, circumvallated (a wall around their wall), and leveled.

Rome saw Jewish rebels when they viewed Christian leaders, and they were not wrong. Paul and the apostles were all Jews. What would they say? “We are not Jewish Jews, but Christian Jews”?

Paul had the difficulty of dealing with the Roman Empire, which saw him as another troublesome Jew, while Jews fomented riots behind his back and Judaizers undercut his Gospel ministry. Add to that the hardships of travel (shipwrecks) and being whipped and jailed.

Yet Paul was thankful. His confession of faith:


1 Timothy 2:3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; 4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.

God’s will is not double-predestination, as the Calvinists teach. They claim, using a proposition central to John Calvin’s work, that God predestined a minority to salvation and a majority to damnation. (Some say before the Fall of Man, while others argue After the Fall, making them either infra or supra-lapsarians.) Understanding the rationalism of the Calvinists is important for comprehending the rationalistic leaps of UOJ people. Pietism took over Calvistic doctrine and copied Reformed cell groups among the Lutherans, one of the first but not the only time that Lutherans thought they could save themselves with false doctrine.

That predestination of the minority is not in harmony with this verse:

God our Saviour; 4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
God’s gracious will is to have all people saved and know the truth of His Word.

Walther quoted Luther on this and closed his Law and Gospel with Luther’s emphasis upon orthodoxy always bearing fruit, never doubting the fruit of the true Word of God when preached and taught.

Walther also said:

"When a theologian is asked to yield and make concessions in order that peace may at last be established in the Church, but refuses to do so even in a single point of doctrine, such an action looks to human reason like intolerable stubbornness, yea, like downright malice. That is the reason why such theologians are loved and praised by few men during their lifetime. Most men rather revile them as disturbers of the peace, yea, as destroyers of the kingdom of God. They are regarded as men worthy of contempt. But in the end it becomes manifest that this very determined, inexorable tenacity in clinging to the pure teaching of the divine Word by no means tears down the Church; on the contrary, it is just this which, in the midst of greatest dissension, builds up the Church and ultimately brings about genuine peace. Therefore, woe to the Church which has no men of this stripe, men who stand as watchmen on the walls of Zion, sound the alarm whenever a foe threatens to rush the walls, and rally to the banner of Jesus Christ for a holy war!"
C. F. W. Walther, The Proper Distinction between Law and Gospel, p. 28.

Walther also wrote about the teaching office:

"True, the estate of teachers has, in general, been little respected, especially in ages gone by; and as far as the teachers of the Word of God are concerned, they are, of all men, most despised and even hated by the world. Nevertheless their estate and office is the most glorious of all, for the following reasons:--
1. The work of their office centers about man's spiritual welfare, his immortal soul.
2. They employ the salutary means and instrument in their work, namely, the Word of the living God.
3. They aim at the salutary and glorious end, namely, to make man truly happy in the present life and to lead him to the life of eternal bliss.
4. They are most wholesomely engaged in an occupation which entirely satisfies their spirits and advances their own selves in the way of salvation.
5. Their labor yields the most precious result, namely, the salvation of man.
6. Their labors have the most glorious promise of the cooperation of the Lord, so that they are never entirely futile and in vain.
7. Their labors have the promise of a gracious reward, which consists in a glory in the world to come that is unutterably great, exceeding abundantly above all they ever could have asked and prayed for in this life."
C. F. W. Walther, The Proper Distinction between Law and Gospel, trans., W. H. T. Dau, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1928, p. 285.
Paul’s confession of faith goes on to say:

5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.

This is a one-sentence confession, concise and plain.

The Two Natures of Christ are taught – the man Christ Jesus is a person of the Godhead. The Christian faith teaches the Three-ness of the One God, and the Unity of the Three Persons, a mystery revealed to us by the Holy Spirit in the Word. This mystery cannot be proven or deduced by logic – it is revealed by God.

God’s gracious nature extends to all men, moving us to pray for all men, including leaders with no religion at all. God’s will that all be saved has moved people to face incredible hardships for their missionary work – not like today, where they live like royalty and have native servants do everything for them.

God’s gracious nature is also revealed in the God-Man Jesus dying on the cross for the sins of the world. This is a universal Gospel which we broadcast to all people. How God wills to be effective in the Word is His sphere of activity, not ours. He reveals the power of the living Word to us and lets us scatter the Gospel seed everywhere.

How can anyone measure this? One blog encourages another. One layman encourages another. But where does it stop? No one knows.

I often think of the pivotal biography, actually dual biographies of Cardinal Manning and Cardinal Newman, both in England, found in Eminent Victorians.
Manning played his cards well and ended as one of the most prominent men in the British Empire. He is forgotten today. His cardinal’s hat was already gathering dust a century ago. What did he leave behind except fleeting fame and toxic doctrine?
Private kingdom builders seldom think about the Gospel itself. It is a rabbit’s foot for them, a lucky charm to use when appropriate, sending as fending off pertinent questions about doctrine.

The apostles were thankful they had the message of salvation for the entire world. It is a message that transcends culture and withstands the attacks of time and error.

"The preaching of this message may be likened to a stone thrown into the water, producing ripples which circle outward from it, the waves rolling always on and on, one driving the other, till they come to the shore. Although the center becomes quiet, the waves do not rest, but move forward. So it is with the preaching of the Word. It was begun by the apostles, and it constantly goes forward, is pushed on farther and farther by the preachers, driven hither and thither into the world, yet always being made known to those who never heard it before, although it be arrested in the midst of its course and is condemned as heresy."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 202. Ascension Day Mark 16:14-20.

Perez Hilton Reader Is Thankful





NKJ Romans 1:27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due. 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to adebased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, 30 backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things,disobedient to parents, 31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; 32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.
  1. To what cultural aspersions do we owe the phenomenon of remaking the remakes of music videos? The Fire Island Pines boys, who created the Miley Cyrus send-up "Party In The F.I.P," receive their own homage with "Party In The MLC" from a bunch of dormmates at a "homecoming summit." QueerTV.

  2. Some (str8?) students at Midland Lutheran College in Nebraska were so enamored with the Fire Island gays' tribute to Miley Cyrus' "Party in the USA", they made their own. Must be some of those liberal Lutherans. Regator.

  3. This is our dorm video for Summit dorm at MLC, Homecoming 2009. Thanks to the fellas of FIP for the inspiration. Digg.com

    NKJ James 1:20 for the wrath of man does not produce the righteousness of God. 21 Therefore lay aside all filthiness and overflow of wickedness, and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls.

    ---



    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Wisconsin Lutheran College Paper Defends "Party in...":

    "Pastor,"
    What did all 7 of these boys say when you tried to personally contact them when you were concerned about their sin? Did you email them at their school accounts? Get their cell phone numbers? I think MLC makes dorm numbers available, that's probably the road you chose...?
    Certainly you tried to privately discuss how this video offended you before you gossiped and slandered their name publicly, right?




    This Thanksgiving I'm thankful for many things. I'm thankful that I have 2 pastors who would never say aloud, let alone mock publicly, people's sins.




    I'm thankful that I know many young men who are studying to be pastors and who would never think to do a such a thing either. And I'm thankful that these men have forgiven you and moved on.

    Lastly, I can't help but see the resemblence (sic) between your angry, hateful blog and that of famous, gay, hateful blogger, Perez Hilton.




    Come to think of it, I'm offended sir. Very offended, you're just as hateful and spiteful as he is. Well, by all means, be a good Christian (because clearly you're the only one around) and take this site down. 

    ***

    GJ - I fail to grasp the comparison. I do not read this Hilton dude. His pink and/or blue hair gave his Fire Island proclivities away. The anonymous WELS student above seems to be a regular at the Hilton blog.

    ---

    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Perez Hilton Reader Is Thankful":

    I'm thankful that we have Dr. Jackson to admonish and expose the modern day crypto-calvinists and secret Arminians who infest Lutherdom today, including MLC, WLC, and WLS.

    ***

    GJ - The students at Mequon, New Ulm, and WLC should glance at Luther's Large Catechism in the Book of Concord, The Ten Commandments, The Eighth Commandment. I will quote it for their edification.

    284] All this has been said regarding secret sins. But where the sin is quite public so that the judge and everybody know it, you can without any sin avoid him and let him go, because he has brought himself into disgrace, and you may also publicly testify concerning him. For when a matter is public in the light of day, there can be no slandering or false judging or testifying; as, when we now reprove the Pope with his doctrine, which is publicly set forth in books and proclaimed in all the world. For where the sin is public, the reproof also must be public, that every one may learn to guard against it. Book of Concord

    The Party in the MLC video was posted for everyone to see, so the claims of privacy cannot be raised. The video stayed on You Tube for days, even though the student producers could read the outcry for themselves. Their claims of ignorance fell flat in light of their desire to parody Party in the FIP.

    Did WLC's The Thword ask me about this before they published their front-page excuses? Not at all. The cries and lamentations of the self-proclaimed victims are a bit exaggerated. They and their friends keep raising the issue by showing their lack of repentance.

    The following section on the Eighth Commandment fits the comment above and many other anonymous posts I receive every day. Some call me a few choice names and say I am not loving. Some are simply obscene and abusive. Others are patronizing and full of Scripture, yet unsigned. Call me thankful for having friends who sign their messages and do not engage in private whispering campaigns. Here is some more Luther for the Luther-an students who never read him:

    281] But if we gossip about another in all corners, and stir the filth, no one will be reformed, and afterwards when we are to stand up and bear witness, we deny having said so. 282] Therefore it would serve such tongues right if their itch for slander were severely punished, as a warning to others. 283] If you were acting for your neighbor's reformation or from love of the truth, you would not sneak about secretly nor shun the day and the light.
    ---

    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Perez Hilton Reader Is Thankful":

    "Certainly you tried to privately discuss how this video offended you before you gossiped and slandered their name publicly, right?"

    As I recall, the students put their names in the video for the whole world to see and acknowledge their stupidity. Gossip and slander were unnecessary. They did it to themselves.

    The writer's tone certainly seems to be that of a cocky MLC student.

    ***

    GJ - How did he begin his message? - with pastor in quotation marks. In other words, he anonymously questioned whether I am a legitimate pastor and accused me of slander. Moreover, the slander consists of posting the video, which was already available world-wide. If the video were so innocent, why is it slander to post something they wanted everyone to see? The MLC athletes were proud that the Fire Island gays loved their knock-off of the original.

    MLC students took a gay video and made it even gayer in their version. The MLC version looked very professional, with good editing, so why was it necessary to have a Michael Jackson move in it? Apparently they wanted everyone to see one of their pals holding his own in a video. Gross, infantile, foolish - the right words escape me.

    I do not know whether this person is MLC or WLC. The schools want to double-team me, and that is fine. Have they stopped to ask these vidiots about their crime? It is a crime to steal music and broadcast it. They used the Miley Cyrus song without permission. That is theft, pure and simple. Crying "Fowl!" only reminds readers of who the turkeys are.

    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Perez Hilton Reader Is Thankful":

    DK was trying to insult somebody's grammr by saying, "He's suckled long and deep at the bosom of mother WELS, and like so many other Lutherans--his brain mysteriously replaced with pudding, and his knowledge of Enlgish grammer, and, ussage and speling replaced with football statistics."

    There, are--like 6 mistakes, in that sentence. And he, clearly had,--- dictionary.com open to kelm synomins.

    ***

    GJ - Maybe he was, like, pullin' yer leg.