 |
| Jerry Sandusky, left, had an office in the athletic complex until last week. Joe Paterno knew about the scandal in 1998. Sandusky ran his camp for boys until 2010, at another Penn State campus, the Erie one. The mothers of the victims were called liars by the university officials. Sandusky's pedophia in the locker room was known 13 years ago. |
bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "The Denomination as a Football Franchise":
Joe Paterno says he'll retire at the end of the season, his 62nd at Penn State. Athletic directors at Pann State tried to get him to retire back in 2004 and he refused. To me, the fact that he'd only consider retiring at the end of the season shows how he doesn't take his inaction seriously enough, though he could be prosecuted along with his bosses for not going to the police. It's this same lack of seriousness that led him to decide not to report the sexual molestation of a minor to police in the first place. If I were the prosecutor, I'd try to make Paterno wear prison stripes for a few years.
---
bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "The Denomination as a Football Franchise":
Here's an example of whistle blower retaliation from today's news, something that denominations engage in aplenty:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/9/grassley-ex-us-attorney-admits-leaking-fast-and-fu
Former U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke in Arizona, who resigned in the wake of a congressional probe into the Fast and Furious undercover investigation his office oversaw, has admitted leaking a sensitive document about a federal agent who blew the whistle on the gunrunning operation, according to Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican.
---
bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "The Denomination as a Football Franchise":
Artist who painted large mural of the Penn State notables, including from the legendary football team, paints over Sandusky's face at request of mother of one of his victims:
http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/11/state_college_mural_artist_to.html
Video:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/45227641#45227641
---
Defended by UOJ stalwarts Herman Otten and SP Mark Schroeder:
Party in the MLC - and also by this guy,
A frame-by-frame copy of Party in the Fire Island Pines, except for MLC's self-grope scene.
Excuse #2 from SP Schroeder - The MLC students were deliberately mocking homosexual behavior.
The second excuse was endorsed by Herman Otten in Christian News, Page 1.
If the MLC performers of the "Fire Island Pines" homoerotic video were ever disciplined, would WELS students rioted? They sure were indignant against Ichabod for reporting the facts. Here's why I ask:
Penn State students riot at firing of coach Joe Paterno and president over enabling the sexual abuse of many (dozens?) of minors:
As if Penn State alumni and donors didn’t have enough reason to hang their heads in shame tonight…:
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/11/10/pinheads-at-penn-state
Speaking of promoting pornography...The (W)ELS still defends the homoerotic Martin Luther College video, Party in the MLC, which was not a parody of Ms. Cyrus' song video but of the video created and published by the homosexuals who attend Fire Island Pines. This video didn't mock the homoerotic behavior of the FIP video but enhanced it. If anything, the video simply added to the homosexual desensitization of thousands of boys and girls.
por·nog·ra·phy /pɔrˈnɒgrəfi/ Spelled[pawr-nog-ruh-fee] IPAnoun - obscene writings, drawings, photographs, or the like, especially those having little or no artistic merit.
By this definition (W)ELS also promotes and publishes pornography and actively defends it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kSdADOIG3Y
To show that this wasn't received as a mocking sodomy here are comments from the homosexuals regarding the (W)ELS MLC Party in the MLC video:
No. 11 · hephaestion
I don’t see the straight college kids as making fun of the gay video. I thought their video was very cute, and I think they just used the Fire Island video as an excuse to liberate themselves to act silly just as the Fire Island guys were being silly in their video. If the college boys had meant for their video to be anti-gay they would have made it anti-gay with really hideous flaming and an ugly tone to the video. What I see is a fun tone… more like “We like being silly, too.” Not “We hate you and want to dehumanize you.” I really don’t think these are anti-gay kids at ALL. Maybe someone should ask them. Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 11:25 am · @Reply ·
No. 13 · hardmannyc · Member · 1071 comments
Yeah, they’re making fun of the Pines boys, but affectionately. And I think some of them are cute! Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 6:32 pm · @Reply ·
No. 14 · Guest
Martin Luther College…not Midland. And these boys are certainly just having fun, no “anti-gay” sentiments here. It was a skit for homecoming. Just a bunch of kids trying to remake a YouTube classic who never thought it would get that many views. Posted: Oct 23, 2009 at 10:39 am · @Reply ·
No. 15 · Alex Taylor
Instead of worring (sic) about this video expressing “anti-gay” sentiments (which I personally don’t think it does), lets have some fun with this and get a friendly debate going…which guy is your favorite? cutest? ugliest? are they straight but still adorable? anyone want to give a critique? Posted: Oct 23, 2009 at 5:34 pm
