Saturday, June 9, 2012

Creflo Dollar Chokes Under Pressure

Creflo Dollar lacks sense.
Have Ski and Glende studied his growing ministry?


http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/06/creflo_dollar_megachurch_pasto.html


ATLANTA — The 15-year-old daughter of megachurch pastor Creflo Dollar told authorities her father choked and punched her, and hit her with his shoe during an argument over whether she could go to a party, according to a police report.

Dollar's 19-year-old daughter corroborated most of her sister's story, but Dollar disputed it, telling a sheriff's deputy he was trying to restrain her when she became disrespectful. When she began to hit back, he wrestled her to the floor and spanked her, according to the police report.

Dollar is one of the most prominent African-American preachers based around Atlanta. His World Changers Church International has 30,000 members in the Atlanta area, and the ministry has satellite churches across the U.S.

Dollar faces misdemeanor charges of simple battery and cruelty to children. He has been released from jail and his lawyer said he is expected to preach Sunday.

Dollar said in a statement Friday he loved his children and would never hurt them.

Around 1 a.m. Friday, his 15-year-old daughter called 911. She told a Fayette County sheriff's deputy that she and her father argued when he said she couldn't go to a party Saturday night, according to the report.
She went into the kitchen with her older sister. When her father asked why she was crying, she told him, "I do not want to talk right now," the report said.

Her father charged at her, put his hands around her throat, began to punch her and started hitting her with his shoe, she told the deputy. The deputy noted a scratch on her neck.

Dollar told the deputy he wouldn't let his daughter go to the party because of poor grades.


The deputy also interviewed Dollar's 19-year-old daughter, who said her father grabbed the younger girl's shoulders and slapped her in the face and choked her for about five seconds. She said her sister tried to break free, but did not fight back. When her father threw the 15-year-old on the floor, the older girl ran to get her mother.

The deputy also spoke to Dollar's wife, Taffi, who said she did not see the fight.

After interviewing Dollar and the two girls, the deputy asked for written statements. The older daughter initially wrote a statement that contradicted what she had told the deputy and was more in line with what Dollar said. When the deputy confronted her about the discrepancies, she told him it was because her parents were with her. Later, when separated from her parents, she wrote what she initially told him.
The 50-year-old Dollar leads the Creflo Dollar Ministries and is the pastor for World Changers Church International in the Atlanta suburb of College Park. World Changers Church-New York hosts over 6,000 worshippers each week.

Satellite churches are also in Los Angeles, Indianapolis, Washington, Cleveland, Dallas and Houston.
He and his wife, a co-pastor at the church, have five children, according to the church's website.
Dollar is a native of College Park and says he received a vision for World Changers Ministries Christian Center in 1986. He held the first service in front of eight people in an elementary school cafeteria.
His ministry grew quickly and the church moved into its present location, an 8,500-seat sanctuary, on Dec. 24, 1995.

Dollar said in a 2007 interview with The Associated Press that he renounced his church salary, and his income only comes from personal investments, including a real estate residential property business and horse breeding company called Dollar Ranch. He's also published more than 30 books, focusing mostly on family and life issues, including debt management.

He said he also sometimes got up to $100,000 for a single appearance on his packed schedule of speaking engagements.

Along with Bishop Eddie Long, Dollar is one of the most prominent African-American preachers based around Atlanta who have built successful ministries on the prosperity gospel, which teaches that God wants to bless the faithful with earthly riches. Ministers in this tradition often hold up their own wealth as evidence that the teaching works.

Long and Dollar were among six televangelists investigated by Iowa U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley from 2007 to 2010, following questions about personal use of church-owned airplanes, luxury homes and credit cards by megachurch pastors and their families. The report did not find any definitive wrongdoing, but it expressed concern about the lack of financial oversight at such large ministries.

Is Mark Jeske a Descendant of Augie Pieper?




Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Glad You Asked - Simpleman.Errors of Knapp Magnifi...":

If a person claims that faith is synergistic (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/synergism?s=t) if sins are forgiven solely by faith in Christ alone, precluding any forgiveness declared before and without faith, than they are teaching faith is a work of man. And since false teaching Lutheran UOJists believe faith is a work of man they declare that faith is nothing but an empty hand doing nothing but receiving what was already declared to be true before they believed.

Further proof that UOJists are teaching decision theology in their doctrine of Universal forgiveness and by their attack on the Holy Spirit's faith:

WELS MLC President Mark Zarling, "Faith does nothing more than receive the forgiveness which is offered in the Gospel. It is not a condition we fulfill nor is it a cause of forgiveness. We are already forgiven. God's message of justification in Christ is there whether we believe it or not. Faith then receives the blessings." And, "Faith that accepts the good news of universal justification is the work of God the Holy Ghost." Page 7
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/ZarlingJustification.pdf

WELS Our Great Heritage states, "And yet many Lutherans still labor under the delusion that God does not forgive us unless we believe. Instead of seeing faith as nothing more than the spiritual hand with which we make the forgiveness of God our own, they see it as a reason why God forgives us. They believe that Christ has indeed provided forgiveness for all men, that God is willing to forgive them, but before he really forgives he first of all demands that we should be sorry for our sins and that we should have faith. Just have faith they say, and then God will forgive you. All the right words are there. The only thing wrong is that the words are in the wrong order. God does not forgive us IF we have faith. He has forgiven us long ago when he raised his Son from the dead." (p. 59)"

WELS Siegbert W. Becker
"Faith does nothing more than accept the forgiveness proclaimed in the Gospel. It is not a condition we must fulfill before we can be forgiven. It is not a cause of forgiveness on account of which God forgives us. The forgiveness comes first. Faith is merely the response to the message. God says to us, “Your sins are forgiven.” This is objective justification, and God’s message to us is true whether we believe it or not. Faith makes God’s message its own and says, “My sins are forgiven.” This is subjective justification. The whole doctrine is just as simple as that." Page 12, The Place of Faith
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/BeckerJustification.PDF

WELS AZ/CA DP Pastor Jon Buchholz
"Faith doesn’t bring anything into existence that doesn’t already exist. Faith doesn’t cause something to happen. Faith simply grasps— trusts—something that already is in place." Page 14
http://archive.wels.net/cgi-bin/site.pl?2617&collectionID=1161&contentID=76707&shortcutID=26388

August Pieper (as quoted by Holy Trinity Lutheran Church and School and Evergreen Lutheran High School in defense of their teaching of UOJ), third volume of the Quartalschrift , "But whoever molests the doctrine of justification stabs the gospel in the heart ...even if he ever so much emphasizes justification by faith."

I believe he was  a key factor in the Protest'ant split.
Here is an easy to remember WELS formula: Not WELS, then damned.
That applies to the ELS (but not to Sweet, Stetzer, Stanley, Driscoll, Hybels, et al.)
If you question this, you are obviously not WELS or soon to be ejected.
***

GJ - My Icha-widow wants me to hurry up. Luther warned that foul errors creep in when the Means of Grace are denied.


The SynConference is a perfect example. Once F. Pieper got his 1932 Brief Statement turned into canon law, above and beyond the Scriptures and the Confessions, Missouri began to tank.

The ONE dogma uniting the SynConference is justification without faith.

---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Is Mark Jeske a Descendant of Augie Pieper?":

Ichabod -

UOJ (universal objective justification) enthusiasts diminish Scripture's teaching about "justification by faith" with their all encompassing declarations of humanity's blanket forgiveness based upon Christ's sacrifice for human sin. They are so myopic in their view that they fail to give the Holy Spirit his divine due. Hence, they ignore the importance of personal faith and belief. I quote from my [this] week's "The Christian Message" topical message:

.........Sinner – Do not think that you will escape God’s just judgment upon your sorry soul. In your unrepentant state without saving faith, you, in your damning unbelief, are like the faithless wealthy church goers, who will share your same eternal everlasting torment death fate. Your eternal death doom will be exacted upon you for the same reason it will be for those whose church going did not make a difference to the Triune God who expects personal faith to be present with the hearing of His Scripture Word. The Scripture teaches that God’s Word can be present, - and, even “heard” by those in Christian worship circles, - but if it isn’t met with faith, it is useless for one’s eternal welfare:

"For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it." - Hebrews 4:2

May I add here, that American churches are plenteous with false preaching and teaching about Christ’s sacrifice on the Cross. As one person commented, on a Christian website, that false gospel is, a "Universal Forgiveness before and without faith."............

"Why Reliance Upon Human Wealth Is So Spiritually Damning"

http://www.thechristianmessage.org/2012/06/why-reliance-upon-human-wealth-is-so.html

I think that it was Brett Meyer who coined those six words of  "Universal Forgiveness before and without faith," on this very own Ichabod website.

Nathan M. Bickel - emeritus pastor

http://www.thechristianmessage.org/

Should I Stop Teaching the Non-Lutherans in the Synodical Conference?

Jack Cascione quoted this with approval, as Robert Preus once did, to prove to everyone that Preus taught UOJ.
My point was clear - Preus once taught UOJ but rejected the dogma in Justification and Rome.

Two things are clear:

  1. The LCMS, WELS, and ELS will continue to make justification without faith their central dogma. 
  2. They will tell any lie to disguise what they really believe, teach, and confess.
The Appleton plagiarists are terribly offended that I teach non-Lutherans in graduate school - actually at two different graduate schools. I have taught world religion over 60 times - to Mormons, Catholics, and "an ordained pagan Egyptian priestess."

The so-called Lutherans could have hired me to teach in their institutions of higher education. I am more qualified than most of their faculties. That is the beauty of the parochial system - someone with the right family connections can be hired to teach at a college or seminary, without any credentials. The current ELS pope, John Moldstad, was hired to teach New Testament without having a bachelor's degree. Larry Olson calls himself "Dr." by virtue of a drive-by D.Min. from Fuller Seminary. Jay Webber was "rector" of the Marvin Schwan UOJ Gospel Lighthouse. Roger Kovaciny, who claimed to be a founder of Church Growth in WELS, served on the faculty, as the Floyd Stolzenburg Professor of Church Growth.

Not one of these men is qualified to teach as an adjunct professor anywhere else but their little parochial schools.

Tim Glende argued that he was infallible by virtue of his EIGHT STRAIGHT YEARS OF EDUCATION, when he was in the process of excommunicating Rick Techlin. Did I mention - TIM STUDIED GREEK!

The solution to the Appleton offense would be to hire me to teach at Martin Luther College, Bethany College, The Sausage Factory, or The Little Schoolhouse on the Prairie. Why didn't they? John Brenner had to take a year of remedial education before he could be admitted to the UW graduate program - after he was hired to teach at Mequon. Brug has a doctorate in Hebrew, so they gave him the yellowed lecture notes of J. P. Meyer and made him dogmatics professor too. That would never happen at an accredited school, where people have to be formally trained in the discipline they teach.

Apart from studying at Fuller Seminary, Bivens and Valleskey had no other education beyond their seminary program. The same could be said for many of the pivotal positions in the WELS and ELS. The most unifying educational factor in the WELS, ELS, and LCMS is study at Fuller Seminary. That is also the best way to get promoted.

Infallible synod popes - Harrison, Schroeder, Moldstad.
Justification by faith offends them.


Lutheran Doctrine Professor, Synodical Conference
My role is to teach the non-Lutherans of the Synodical Conference, a much bigger challenge than teaching Lutheran doctrine at online universities, where the students respect the professors. They thank me for posting Gerhardt hymns, for quoting Luther, for emphasizing the efficacy of the Word.

Lutherans need to admit to themselves that SP Harrison, SP Schroeder, and SP Moldstad are not Lutheran. All three men reject justification by faith, no matter what they protest to cover their tracks. They have no concept of the efficacy of the Word, so they do not trust God's Word to accomplish His will - contrary to Isaiah 55 and many other passages.

Harrison, Schroeder, and Moldstad are unable to teach the Means of Grace, although they may toy with the words from time to time. So does the real Pope in Rome. Roman Catholics teach the Means of Grace, but read the fine print. The three Synod Popes are just bad imitations of Holy Father Antichrist. They are the little Antichrists of Scripture, aiding and abetting, small potatoes.

Discipline for Harrison, Schroeder, and Moldstad does not mean condemning impenitent sinners and false teachers, but condemning and expelling those who question their infallibility.

What did Harrison do when it was proven that LCMS District Presidents put a known sex offender into the pastoral office and kept him there to rape again? Harrison silenced his robotic followers - and they fell into stupefied silence, content to let more sex offenders have their way in the ministerial office. Will Harrson back the lawsuit of the Pennsylvania victim of child abuse? The man has an eye-witness who saw it happen, but that witness is a famous professor. Missouri's policy is to destroy evidence, as the lawsuit points out.

Will Missouri, WELS, and the ELS give back their Marvin Schwan indulgence commissions, since they know the truth about his "Scriptural divorce"? No, their hands are stretched out for more.

Short version - make up whatever you want, because the Confessions approve!


---


The charge of being anti-Christian and specifically the charge of being an Antichrist made to those who act contrary to Christ while declaring they do it by his authority is very serious.  I agree with Pastor Jackson that the title of Antichrist not only applies to the anti-Christian Pope but also to those in the Lutheran Synods who declare the false gospel of Universal Objective Justification, UOJ (aka: Objective Justification or General Justification).  There cannot be a more heinous crime in the church than to pervert the central and chief article of Christian faith – the doctrine by which a person, if faithfully believed, instantaneously receives Christ’s righteousness for the forgiveness of all sin (which is justification), is adopted as God’s child and is saved eternally.  This same doctrine if believed and confessed contrary to Scripture separates a person from Christ and thereby remains under God’s wrath and condemnation over sin, and does not obtain Christ as Mediator through faith alone.  All doctrine, churches, denominations and people stand or fall by their confession of this chief and central Christian doctrine.  Uncorrected errors in doctrine and practice are a fruit of confessing trust in the false gospel of UOJ.  Defense of false doctrine and practice is an absence of the Holy Spirit in those who reject His faith, worked solely through the Means of Grace, which clings to Christ alone for the forgiveness of sins and salvation.  Apathy concerning the outward expressions of false doctrine and practice is a significant trait of laity who, having been fed putrid doctrines taught by false teachers, are exchanging their Baptismal faith in Christ for the false comfort of group think, Synod worship and the theology of glory.  Fortunately, the defense of false doctrine and practice by the equally false teachers in the Lutheran Synods comes at a price.  They are incorrigibly contradictory in their speech concerning the Word of God.  It is the Holy Spirit alone who works faithfulness and clarity of thought and speech in faithful Christians.  Having rejected the Holy Spirit’s faith, UOJists lack the guidance of the Holy Spirit and instead become puppets for their father below and are unable to remain consistent and faithful to Scripture and the Christian Lutheran Confessions.  Below I quote from the Confessions that the forgiveness of sins is only declared and imputed to those with faith in Christ alone.  The (W)ELS quotes show the depth of Scriptural depravity that the Lutheran Synods have traveled in their journey into apostasy.

“10] These treasures are offered us by the Holy Ghost in the promise of the holy Gospel; and faith alone is the only means by which we lay hold upon, accept, and apply, and appropriate them to ourselves. 11] This faith is a gift of God, by which we truly learn to know Christ, our Redeemer, in the Word of the Gospel, and trust in Him, that for the sake of His obedience alone we have the forgiveness of sins by grace, are regarded as godly and righteous by God the father, and are eternally saved. 12] Therefore it is considered and understood to be the same thing when Paul says that we are justified by faith, Rom. 3, 28, or that faith is counted to us for righteousness, Rom. 4, 5, and when he says that we are made righteous by the obedience of One, Rom. 5, 19, or that by the righteousness of One justification of faith came to all men, Rom. 5, 18. 13] For faith justifies, not for this cause and reason that it is so good a work and so fair a virtue, but because it lays hold of and accepts the merit of Christ in the promise of the holy Gospel; for this must be applied and appropriated to us by faith, if we are to be justified thereby. 14] Therefore the righteousness which is imputed to faith or to the believer out of pure grace is the obedience, suffering, and resurrection of Christ, since He has made satisfaction for us to the Law, and paid for [expiated] our sins. 15] For since Christ is not man alone, but God and man in one undivided person, He was as little subject to the Law, because He is the Lord of the Law, as He had to suffer and die as far as His person is concerned. For this reason, then, His obedience, not only in suffering and dying, but also in this, that He in our stead was voluntarily made under the Law, and fulfilled it by this obedience, is imputed to us for righteousness, so that, on account of this complete obedience, which He rendered His heavenly Father for
us, by doing and suffering, in living and dying, God forgives our sins, regards us as godly and righteous, and eternally saves us. 16] This righteousness is offered us by the Holy Ghost through the Gospel and in the Sacraments,<b> and is applied, appropriated, and received through faith</b>, whence believers have reconciliation with God, forgiveness of sins, the grace of God sonship, and heirship of eternal life. 17] Accordingly, the word justify here means to declare righteous and free from sins, and to absolve one from eternal punishment for the sake of Christ's righteousness, which is imputed by God to faith, Phil. 3, 9. For this use and understanding of this word is common in the Holy Scriptures of the Old and the New Testament. Prov. 17, 15: He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the Lord. Is. 5, 23: Woe unto them which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him! Rom. 8, 33: Who shall lay anything to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth, that is, absolves from sins and acquits.”
http://www.bookofconcord.org/sd-righteousness.php

AAC That We Obtain The Remission of Sins By Faith Alone In Christ, "80] The wrath of God cannot be appeased if we set against it our own works, because Christ has been set forth as a Propitiator, so that, for his sake, the Father may become reconciled to us. But Christ is not apprehended as a Mediator except by faith. Therefore, by faith alone we obtain remission of sins when we comfort our hearts with confidence in the mercy promised for Christ's sake."

The following are self indicting statements from (W)ELS District President Jon Buchholz given and approved at the 2005 WELS Convention.  Note how they declare a doctrine contrary to the Christian Confessions and are immediately contradict what was previously stated.

Buchholz, “In each example, the mark of heresy is to go as far as Scripture goes—and then to go one step further”.  P.7

"God has forgiven the whole world. God has forgiven everyone his sins." This statement is absolutely true! This is the heart of the gospel, and it must be preached and taught as the foundation of our faith. <b>But here’s where the caveat comes in: In Scripture, the word "forgive" is used almost exclusively in a personal, not a universal sense. The Bible doesn’t make the statement, "God has forgiven the world</b>."  p. 7

"God has forgiven all sins, but the unbeliever rejects God’s forgiveness." Again, this statement is true—and Luther employed similar terminology to press the point of Christ’s completed work of salvation.16 <b>But we must also recognize that Scripture doesn’t speak this way</b>."  p.8

"God has declared the entire world righteous." This statement is true, as we understand it to mean that God has rendered a verdict of "not-guilty" toward the entire world. It is also true—and must be taught—that the righteousness of Christ now stands in place of the world’s sin; this is the whole point of what Jesus did for us at Calvary. <b>However, once again we’re wresting a term out of its usual context. In Scripture the term "righteous" usually refers to believers</b>. "  p. 9
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/BuchholzJustification.pdf

And in his June 2012 Emmanuel Church newsletter he makes this statement, “Our unity centers in our connection to Jesus Christ, our one Savior.  We are united by complete agreement in our teaching.  We are united in God’s Word and in complete agreement with everything it says. We hold unswervingly to God’s teaching in the Holy Bible as the only reliable, unchanging source of truth.  We do not wish to depart one iota from what God says.

(W)ELS quotes promoting UOJ in Mark Zarling’s paper, Stand in Awe of Justification. (former WELS MLC president)
“the glorious Gospel: In Jesus, God has declared the entire world righteous and forgiven, irregardless of whether or not the world believes it. Such is the jewel described by objective, universal, or general justification.” Page 2

Quoting Permit Stoeckhardt, “If God has already in Christ justified all men and forgiven their sins, then I also in Christ have a gracious God and the forgiveness of all my sins.” Page 5 “Irregardless of man's faith, God declares the world just.” Page 6

“Our salvation is an accomplished fact. It is done. It is finished. The resurrection is the proof that God has declared the sinners justified!” Page 6

“Faith does nothing more than receive the forgiveness which is offered in the Gospel. It is not a condition we fulfill nor is it a cause of forgiveness. We are already forgiven.” Page 7

“Simply present Law and Gospel. Warn sinners that unbelief damns, and rejection of Christ will bring eternal torment. Then comfort them with the glorious objective reality that all sins are already forgiven in Christ.” Page 7
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/ZarlingJustification.pdf


---


From Pastor Nathan Bickel:



Dr. Jackson,


Count it God's blessing that you were never asked or called to teach higher education in Lutheran synodical schools. [Else if it had turned out for you, as such, Lutheran UOJ (universal objective justification) inbreeding may have taken its toll upon you, also] 


The good Lord apparently had other plans for you, - that being, teaching heathen and non-Lutherans. Despised in Lutheran circles as you must be, should be no shame [for you]. Rather, it is the mark of the suffering Christ. Did He not say:


"Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets." - Luke 6:26


Dr. Jackson - be content with the prophetic ministry the Lord has apparently laid upon your Arkansas backwoods [often rejected] lap......


Nathan M. Bickel - pastor emeritus


www.thechrisitanmessage.org


www.moralmatters.org


DP Engelbrecht on Plagiarism « Light from Light

The District Pope is never wrong.


DP Engelbrecht on Plagiarism « Light from Light:


Last Fall, District President Engelbrecht presented a paper entitled “A Clarion Call” to be faithful to the word and tenor of the gospel.  He presented this paper at a WELS pastors’ conference in Autumn 2011.  This “clarion call” was subtitled: “A Presentation And Discussion Of Various Concerns That Have Been Raised Recently In Our Midst.”

One issue dealt with in this paper was plagiarism.  The District President dealt with this issue because there were complaints about pastors in the Northern Wisconsin District plagiarizing the sermons and words of false teachers, and passing them off as their own.

In defining plagiarism, the District President relied heavily on Wikipedia.  However, Wikipedia is an online collaborative free encyclopedia.  In other words, anyone with internet access can change or alter Wikipedia.  That is why no reputable paper should authoritatively cite Wikipedia.

Sadly, the District President’s reliance upon Wikipedia in framing the issue of plagiarism resulted in numerous problems.  The first problem is that after the District President presented his paper, someone (not me or anyone known by me) changed Wikipedia’s definition of plagiarism.  At the time of this writing, it no longer agrees with the previous definition, the one cited by District President Engelbrecht.

The second problem is that a section of District President Engelbrecht’s citation appears to have been itself plagiarized from plagiarism.org.  (http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_what_is_plagiarism.html).  It is ironic that in attempting to teach others about plagiarism, the District President inadvertently included plagiarization in his own paper.  This is not to say that District President Engelbrecht intentionally deceived the pastors of his district.  Putting the best construction on this he is just sloppy and unprofessional.

The best construction is that the District President was aggressively sloppy.  This is because he had a well written definition of the issues of plagiarism that had been given to him by an attorney, but that professional information apparently did not suit the District President.  So instead, he scraped together a half-plagiarized definition from Wikipedia.

Quoting from Wikipedia.com, District President Engelbrecht said: “‘In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud.  It involves both stealing someone else’s work and lying about it afterward.’”  Then District President Engelbrecht immediately came to the conclusion that by “definition, then, using someone else’s material with their permission would not be considered plagiarism per se.”  (Page 2.  Emphasis altered).

However, if the District President had gone to the original source, plagiarism.org (a source that I cited in my November 2009 and January 2011 letters), then he could have read that sentence in its original context.  There he would have seen on the same page it also says:

All of the following are considered plagiarism:

•    turning in someone else’s work as your own
•    copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
•    failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
•    giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
•    changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
•    copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on “fair use” rules)

The District President continues to confuse copyright theft with plagiarism.  In Pastor Glende’s case, he was accused of plagiarism, which is deceit.  He was not accused of copyright theft.  When the issue of plagiarism was presented to the District Presidium, the differences between copyright infringement and plagiarism were clearly presented.  Here is an extended excerpt from the letter sent to the District President in November 2009:

According to plagiarism.org:

“plagiarism is the use of another’s original words or ideas as though they were your own.  Any time you borrow from an original source and do not give proper credit, you have committed plagiarism . . .”  (Plagiarism FAQs).

Plagiarism usually involves two parts:  First, there is a copyright theft from the original author.  Second, there is a fraud as the plagiarist passes off the other’s work as his own.  However, plagiarism does not necessarily involve copyright theft.  For example, if a student purchases a term paper and hands it in as his own; that is obviously not a theft, however it is still a fraud.  Copyright theft and plagiarism are not the same crime.  Copyright theft is a violation against the author, while plagiarism is essentially a fraud perpetrated against the audience.

In the case of the purchased term paper, it is of no significance to the professor that the student has the original author’s permission to plagiarize.  A man who sells term papers cannot authorize students to deceive professors.  Likewise, a man who gives away sermons cannot authorize other pastors to deceive their congregations.

Just as a journalist is hired by a news organization to write news reports, and is expected to write his own news reports; so also Pastor Glende has been called by our congregation to write pure gospel sermons, and is expected to write his own sermons.  Does the seminary accept plagiarized sermons from its students?  If not, then why should a congregation?

(Footnotes omitted).

That letter provided ample evidence of plagiarism both in the form of documented facts and applicable law.  Was there something wrong with that standard definition of plagiarism?  If not, then why did the District President undertake to redefine what is and is not plagiarism?  Why did the District President not even acknowledge the above definition in his so-called presentation of the concerns that were brought to the Presidium?

According to District President Engelbrecht’s twisted definition, a student who purchased a term paper, and handed it in as his own would not be guilty of “plagiarism” because he would have had the permission of the original author.  Yet, that is the very definition of plagiarism.

The District President has finally come out against “deception” and “plagiarism,” and that is good.  The District President has finally agreed that in theory “plagiarism” is wrong and pastors should not deceive while preaching.  This is some progress.  However, why did it take over a year to get this admission?  And why in the process did he redefine the meaning of plagiarism to mean it is not “plagiarism” if the original author gives permission to plagiarize?

The result of the District President’s twisted redefinition of “plagiarism” is that Pastor Glende gets to claim he is not guilty of plagiarism because the District Presidium says so.  And the men of the District Presidium get to maintain publically that they have dealt appropriately with the issue, when they have not.  Plagiarism is a fraud and a deceptive sin, and it becomes a doctrinal issue for the Church when the words of false teachers are used in this deception.  There are pastors in the WELS who have engaged in and/or defended this sin, and they are unrepentant.

In March 2011, the pastors of St. Peter Congregation and the District Presidium met with some concerned area pastors and laymen for the purpose of resolving this issue among others.  However, instead of seeking to resolve the issues in good faith, they secretly planned to terminate fellowship with the layman who pointed out the truth and who was seated across the table from them.  (That deceitful ambush termination of fellowship was finalized approximately two weeks after the above mentioned meeting).  So instead of repenting the sin of plagiarism, they redefined sin, and rent the Body of Christ.

The District President said in his “clarion call”:

Over the past couple of years a number of issues and concerns have been brought before the District Presidium by various individuals, involving doctrine, practice, and approaches to ministry.  Some of them were cleared up immediately, some were the result of misunderstandings and miscommunication and were resolved through extensive discussion, some fall under the category of legitimate differences of opinion on approaches to ministry, and some called for continued evangelical warnings to the brethren to help them avoid straying from the Word, the Lutheran Confessions, and the tenor of the gospel.  It must be stated that at no point in time did the District Presidium find false doctrine being espoused or promoted by anyone.

This gives the impression that everything has been resolved.  However, I am not aware of any issue being resolved.  For example, how can the issue of plagiarism be resolved when the pastors involved are unrepentant, and have gone so far as to terminate fellowship with those who pointed out the truth?

There needs to be repentance.  Sin is real.  Sin is not like a thought that can evaporate if we cover it up.  Hiding the truth does not cure sin.  Sin is like a malignant cancer, and it will continue to rot until it is cleansed by Christ.  The District President cannot cure sin or cancer by twisting words and making up his own language.  Cancer is cancer.  Sin is sin.  If sin is not cleansed, the result is spiritual death.  (Romans 6:23).  Thus, there needs to be repentance.

Repentance and forgiveness is easy.  There have been so many opportunities to say, “Hey, we screwed up.  How can we fix this together as brothers?”  That would have been so easy.  So easy.  The debt of sin has been paid.  (John 1:29).  Repentance and forgiveness is as easy as drawing a breath and exhaling.  Why cannot we tread this beautiful path together?  Unfortunately, that question points to a deeper theological problem in this district: the teaching that Christians can choose to believe.  Can the dry bones of Israel live and breath?  God alone knows.  (Ezekiel 37:3).  Repentance consists of contrition and faith, and like life itself, faith is 100% the gift of God.  (Ephesians 2:8, Acts 11:18; Apology Augsburg Confession, Art. XII Repentance).

Kyrie eleison.


'via Blog this'

***

GJ - UOJ is plagiarized from Rambach and Knapp, Pietists. One cannot build on a foundation of cardboard.

Glad You Asked - Simpleman.
Errors of Knapp Magnified by the Current Crop of Enthusiasts



Simpleman Jones has left a new comment on your post "The Rock Is Justification by Faith - Not Justifica...":

What is the problem with the Knapp quote? Isn't he saying the same thing you say, only he uses the phrase "objective justification"?

***

GJ - I have answered this before, in Luther versus the UOJ Pietists, and various posts.

The Woods/Knapp Error, Part I
The most basic problem is the distortion of the Biblical word "justification." That word means "a declaration of innocence." Woods, a Calvinist, interpreted Knapp (a Halle Pietist) as saying - the entire world has been given a universal declaration of forgiveness.

A Lutheran could misinterpret this Woods explanation as saying that God has redeemed the world through Christ. The key difference is justification, which is where the UOJ Enthusiasts start howling. Woods and Knapp merge the atonement with justification, making the death of Christ the absolution of the world.

That error is leveraged by Woods using the term pardon: justification is pardon in his lexicon.

To clarify, the Scriptures teach that the atonement is universal, because Christ paid the price for all sins for all mankind. That point is not disputed, although the UOJ Stormtroopers always want to confuse the issue with false charges.

The Woods/Knapp Error, Part II
The Word of God is utterly consistent. The Scriptures are in perfect harmony, all parts agreeing with each other.

Therefore, an error about the atonement will necessarily lead to many other errors. The language makes me grind my aging molars - "an act of man." Do Lutherans want to plant their banner there? An act of man means making a decision for Christ. God offers a transaction, which man completes - the classic definition of synergism.

And it is worse yet - "he accepts the pardon freely offered," leaving no doubt that this gives man the glory for  doing the right thing.

Missing from Woods/Knapp and UOJ, Part III
The silence is as important as the errors. Woods and Knapp are silent about the Means of Grace.

Everyone wants to associate grace with forgiveness, and that is good. This quotation dis-associates (hyphen in the original manuscript) grace from the Word, grace from the Means of Grace.

How exactly did God pardon all of mankind from Adam to Zelda? How can it be, that the Holy Spirit always works through the Word, except in absolving all people of sin, so they are born forgiven, as E. Preuss claimed?

The Scriptures teach, as the Book of Concord witnesses, that Christ earned forgiveness through His atoning death, that this grace is distributed by the Holy Spirit through the Instruments of Grace, the Word and Sacraments.  The power of the Gospel imparts and sustains faith, so forgiveness is received through that faith  that the Promises give.

Medium Rare observed that Knapp and UOJ are prime examples of blaspheming the Holy Spirit. The first part of the blasphemy is attributing absolution to mankind without the work of the Holy Spirit. This great miracle just happens, even though the Word of God failed to record it. The second part of this blasphemy is giving man credit for saving himself, by making a decision for Christ. Look in your NIV Bible for "the sinner's prayer."

I am not going to say what Calvin always taught, because he contradicted himself, just as Spener did in his own voluminous works. Both were tireless workers, so their efforts spread everywhere. One can read Zwingli (hard to find) but Calvin's commentaries are everywhere, including Lutheran pastors' offices (sorry to report). Spener's cell groups are everywhere, especially the SynConference today. In contrast, Luther always taught the efficacy of the Word in the Means of Grace.

Spener was the first union theologian, merging Calvin's doctrine with Lutheran teaching. Halle University was established to teach Pietism. The true founder of Missouri, Bishop Martin Stephan, studied at Halle and imparted his version of justification to C. F. W. Walther.

Walther adopted the Rambach spin on UOJ, an emphasis on Easter absolution rather than Good Friday absolution. The Stormtroopers have never resolved this contradiction.

Walther was not a great theologian. He graduated from a rationalistic university with a four-year degree. His "conservative" training consisted of attending a Philobiblicum (Halle Pietism) cell group, following a fierce and demanding Pietist, and finally submitting to Stephan's cell group leadership.

Both of Walther's Pietistic mentors demanded absolute submission to their authority, as Zion on the Mississippi records with meticulous detail. When Stephan was caught giving syphilis to the young women in his group, Walther took over the authority of the bishop, after organizing the mob, robbing Stephan, and leaving him to die on the Illinois side of the Mississippi River.

One can trace the habit of UOJ deception with the Mormon-like tales of the Great Walther leading a confused and bewildered group out of the wilderness. Walther took over the congregation his brother founded and took over the episcopate that Stephan established. The LCMS histories still claim that Walther and his good buddy were "shocked" to discover Stephan's adultery.

But Stephan left his wife and family (except his healthy son) in Europe, came across with his mistress and groupies, and lived in open sin in St. Louis. Everyone knew he was an adulterer, so the shocking confession story had to be pedaled later to explain the violence and venom of the mob that Walther brought down to Perryville. No one wanted to admit how many women caught syphilis from their bishop. His children and wife were dying from the dread disease in Europe.

Walther explained (privately) that Stephan's adultery was the fault of his wife. And Marvin Schwan had a "Scriptural divorce." Remember that, folks, whenever you see a gushing reference to St. Marvin in the LCMS, ELS, and WELS. Marvin's wife, the mother of his children, is blamed in the same way. Remember her anguish when she killed herself, whenever you use a Marvin Schwan building or retreat center.

That is the ultimate damage of Knapp's UOJ. False doctrine hardens the heart and makes deception and slander necessary in maintaining the Pietistic illusion of sanctity.

---

AC V has left a new comment on your post "The Rock Is Justification by Faith - Not Justifica...":

Simpleman Jones,

The error that jumps out at me about Knapp's quote is that he makes faith an act of man. That's what happens when you use the terms "Objective Justification" and "Subjective Justification." Are there two Justifications?

Faith is an act of God. It is every bit as "objective" as God's mercy, Christ's merit, and the gospel which proclaims it. Knapp should have refreshed his memory of the Formula of Concord III:25 "The Righteousness of Faith":

"...the article of justification, in and to which belong and are necessary only the grace of God, the merit of Christ, and faith, which receives this in the promise of the Gospel, whereby the righteousness of Christ is imputed to us, whence we receive and have forgiveness of sins, reconciliation with God, sonship, and heirship of eternal life. 

Friday, June 8, 2012

Thoughts from Pastor Nathan Bickel



Some thoughts related to Christ’s Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus –

Those who find (short lived) “relief” while sitting in their church pews, hearing absolution pronouncements and sermons of cheap grace

As I woke from a short nap I began thinking the following:

Those who possess their stocks and bonds and, an abundance of material possessions, be it a second home, RV, yacht, etc. - these people never have to concern themselves with paying their bills and taxes on time, and making ends meet. They don't have to struggle in this world, to exist with "dignity." They have all the dignity that life could offer. [So, they think]

Their dignity is their reputation. They take pride in that reputation, because their existence is free from needing outside help. Their self abundant rich lifestyle thus insulates them from having to rely upon God for their self worth and inner strength. Hence, they feel no need to exercise personal faith in Christ. Going to church on Sundays, replaces all that, as they can join in the general prayer of confession and hear the general absolution and later (in the same church gathering) hear the pastor pronounce cheap grace in his sermon, as he repeatedly states that Christ's sacrifice (of total absolution) included them, with all of humanity.

However, those who are rich are ensnared by their own, more than comfortable existence. The Scripture says:

"But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition. For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows." - 1 Timothy 6:9-10

Those who leave their trust in Christ, in exchange for their comfortable and care free living, are often unaware what has happened to them. Hence, the rich man's non compassion for poor Lazarus. But, Scripture says that they who have built their existence upon "sand" – those dwellings, are, but a house of cards existence. - Matthew 7

I think of the Scripture:

"Remove far from me vanity and lies: give me neither poverty nor riches; feed me with food convenient for me: Lest I be full, and deny thee, and say, who is the LORD? Or lest I be poor, and steal, and take the name of my God in vain" - Proverbs 30:8-9

American "Christian" churches are full of human souls, who, by global standards are relatively (financially) rich. Yet, many of these souls (I believe) unwittingly make a pretense of genuine worship toward our Triune God. True worship is replaced by their ever full pocket books. They give freely and abundantly to their church. This self satisfaction, of doing so, (I believe) is a replacement for having to place their trust in the good Lord for their daily care and keeping. It's easier to go online and check their investments and pull cash out of fattened pocket books and purses than to exercise any faith in Christ for their daily created existence.

But, be that as it may, the rich (indeed), are needy souls. But, they are often unaware of their true personal spiritual needs, unless, perhaps, God deals their health a severe blow. Their existence is very comfortable. They have no worries or concerns of paying their bills and taxes. They have no struggle. But, they come to church and join in its many faceted congregational activities, seeking acceptance and status. [They love to be regarded as "good" people]



They are pros at being sociable; yet, they lack genuine friendliness and compassion. They give of their wealth to their respectable church and "respectable" church denominational body, but would seldom lift a pecuniary finger in the direction of those lower than their comfortable status position. They end up utilizing their church status and its "holy" four walled acceptance to stroke their egos. More often than not, they inwardly and unconsciously exhibit the attitude of the Pharisee who thanked God in his prayer to himself that he was not like those sinners. - Luke 18:11 

Certainly, I see modern day parallels with Christ's Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus. Its reality is being lived out every day and in every age, as Luther well stated.

Nathan M. Bickel - pastor emeritus


Hebrews 12






Dawkins calls for 'Catholic' honesty - < The Irish Times. >
SynConference Prefers Walther's Pietism to Luther's Doctrine.
Child Abuse Argues Against Catholicism and
Corrupt Lutheran Synods

Prof Richard Dawkins says he was intrigued by an Irish Times poll showing 62 per cent of Catholics believe the bread and wine blessed during Mass `only represents the body and blood? of Christ Photograph: David Levenson/Getty Images
Dawkins' comments about Roman Catholics
are dead accurate about the Synodical Conference.


Dawkins calls for 'Catholic' honesty - The Irish Times - Wed, Jun 06, 2012:


JOE HUMPHREYS

People who describe themselves as Catholic but do not accept the church’s key teachings should be “honest” and admit they no longer belong to the faith, atheist author and scientist Prof Richard Dawkins has told a Dublin audience.

He said he was intrigued by this week’s Irish Times/Ipsos MRBI poll showing almost two thirds (62 per cent) of Catholics believed the bread and wine which was blessed during Mass “only represents the body and blood” of Christ.

Just 26 per cent said they believed the bread and wine transformed into Christ’s body and blood in accordance with the doctrine of transubstantiation.

“If they don’t believe in transubstantiation then they are not Roman Catholics,” Prof Dawkins said. “If they are honest they should say they are no longer Roman Catholics.”

The survey finding “should come in for a fair degree of ridicule,” he added. “I wouldn’t hold back on the ridicule”.

Prof Dawkins was speaking at a public interview in the National Concert Hall last night as part of the Dublin Writers Festival.

He said he was encouraged by the growth of the atheist movement in Ireland, and a gradual shift towards “science and reason” at the expense of the Catholic Church.

“The number of priests is going down beautifully,” he said.

In addition, the child abuse controversy has eroded the church’s authority and the “extraordinarily ham-fisted way” the church responded “has helped”.


'via Blog this'

WELS and the ELS Are Confessional?
Just the Opposite Is True:
They Are Anti-Confessional


A. Berean on Justification without Faith - The Dogma of the SynConference



A. Berean has left a new comment on your post "Justification by Faith in the Catechisms - Docume...":

I love how Luther always ties forgiveness to the Means of Grace (as one would expect since Scripture does as well). I've had some UOJ Sem Profs tell me that Righteousness is not only secured for all men; not only offered, but even given apart from the Means of Grace. This is based on the axiom that you cannot receive what has not been previously given.

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "A. Berean on Justification without Faith - The Dog...":

Get the UOJists in the Lutheran Synods to discuss their false central and chief doctrine of Universal Forgiveness before and without faith and they will scewer themselves on their own contradictions and the perverse teaching of their false gospel.

Here's Wayne Mueller (W)ELS, presenting one of UOJ's trichobezoar's.

"Appeal to the Lutheran symbols did not resolve the objective justification controversy. (Note Vernon Harley’s use of the Confessions to limit exegetical conclusions in his “Exegetical Study of Scripture Passages Generally Used to Teach ‘Objective’ or ‘Universal’ Justification” 1984, p8) “This is basically why they contend so strongly for ‘objective’ justification and go a step further than our Lutheran Confessions insisting that Objective Justification is the Chief article of the Christian Faith, while our Confessions give that honor to justification by grace through faith”"
Page 7
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/MuellerSymbols.pdf

---

A. Berean has left a new comment on your post "Luther's Romans Commentary - UOJ":

The defense used by those who teach UOJ is a false syllogism: "all [men] have sinned" v. 12, "(the) many were made sinners" v. 19, therefore "(the) many" equals "all [men]"

When the error of that syllogism is pointed out, they say "well, look at the tight parallel with verse 18..." THATS THE SAME FAULTY SYLLOGISM!

---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "A. Berean on Justification without Faith - The Dog...":

And clearly based on Andreae's statements, the object of faith that receives justification is the atonement of Jesus Christ, i.,e Christ's work and person. As we have read and seen many times, UOJ teachers even categorically state that this is not to be the object of faith, rather, it should be the justification of you which already happened 2000 years ago at the Cross or at Christ' Resurrection.

Andreae therefore clearly was not a UOJer, neither were the other colleagues of his.

LPC

EXCLUSIVE: Booker on outs with Obama after TV gaffe - NYPOST.com.
Just like WELS, LCMS, ELS -
You Are Not Cleared To Think on Your Own.
The Ice Curtain Descends

Remember this - at a "free" conference,
they control discussion and ban people.


EXCLUSIVE: Booker on outs with Obama after TV gaffe - NYPOST.com:


It’s bye-bye, Beltway for Cory Booker.

Newark’s mayor, who was gunning for a spot in President Obama’s Cabinet, lost the chance after he shot his mouth off during a blunderingly honest TV appearance last month, sources told The Post.
“He’s dead to us,” one ranking administration official said of the prevailing feelings at the White House and Obama headquarters in Chicago.

Booker had been angling for the housing secretary gig in a second Obama term, according to sources in the administration and close to the mayor.

The job was certainly a possibility, given Booker’s work in New Jersey’s biggest city, according to administration and Democratic Party sources.

AP
ON THE OUTS: The once-close relationship between President Obama and Cory Booker has turned cold after the Newark mayor angered the Obama camp by denouncing attempts to badmouth Mitt Romney’s record at Bain Capital.

Thinking highly of Booker, Obama’s campaign asked him to appear on “Meet the Press” on May 20 to act as a mouthpiece, but he proceeded to eviscerate one of the president’s key campaign themes.

Booker told a national TV audience the president’s attacks on Mitt Romney’s record at private-equity firm Bain Capital were “nauseating” and made him “very uncomfortable.”

“I have to just say from a very personal level, I’m not about to sit here and indict private equity,” said Booker, a rising Democratic star tapped by the president’s campaign as a “surrogate” speaker for Obama. “If you look at the totality of Bain Capital’s record, they’ve done a lot to support businesses.”

Almost immediately, top Obama aides were speed-dialing Booker, insisting he backpedal from his comments before returning to the Garden State. But the mayor wouldn’t do that.

Booker further enraged them by waiting until that night to post an online video that was neither cleared by the campaign nor acceptable to Obama strategists.


Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/bam_on_cory_he_dead_to_us_1GuWVs0Tx3HuxZ9mu5SSPJ#ixzz1xDOlPlPY


'via Blog this'

Lindee's Culture War Paper



https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4826137/Lindee_CultureWars.pdf

'via Blog this'

The Rock Is Justification by Faith -
Not Justification without Faith

"Upon this bedrock I will build My Church."
Grace comes only from the Means of Grace,
the Holy Spirit at work in the invisible Word of teaching and preaching,
the visible Word of the sacraments.


Justification by faith is the chief article of Christianity. The great opponent of Pietism, Loescher, called it "the article on which the Church stands or falls."

Unitarian-Universalism is definitely not the foundation of the Christian Church, but UOJ finds itself bloood-brothers with the UUAs, the mainline liberals, and various oddball sects that also teach the justification of the entire world.

Barth - or rather his mistress Charlotte Kirschbaum - taught UOJ. Who embraced Barth's UOJ? Carl Braaten! Youngsters do not realize that Braaten was the Child Prodigy and later the Elderly Apostate who edited the Braaten-Jenson Church Dogmatics. The BJ Church Dogmatics ridiculed all the articles of faith in the Apostles Creed. They acknowledged that the Christian Church once believed those things like the Virgin Birth and Atonement, but they did not - in this modern, scientific world. Braaten is proud to note his book is still in print (just like Knapp's theological lectures, the font of modern UOJ).



But, nota bene, Braaten had his limits too. When his radical leftist seminary in Chicago dropped "The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit" from the liturgy, in favor of feminist language, he refused to attend chapel, at the Lutheran School of Theology in Chicago, from that point on. And now they dedicate compost tumblers at that same chapel. Are you laughing until tears squirt from your eyes? Oh my, I can hardly type at this point.

The solemn dedication of the compost tumbler
filled the feminist audience with awe as they meditated upon
evolution and Mother Earth.


Deep down, the Shrinkers realize they have no message in UOJ. That is why they run off for comfort from Babtists Stetzer, Stanley, and Warren. Or they cast longing eyes at Rome - as Weedon and McCain do.

The UOJ crowd has plenty of damnation for the universally forgiven and saved. They need to get justification right first, before they run at the mouth about every subject under the Son. They defame the Word of God and reject the Confessions with every scrofulous act.

Doctrine Means Teaching


The people who lecture me about academics are amusing. They might get away with teaching at their parochial schools, because a parochial education prepares someone to carry on the worship of Holy Mother Synod. These professors of parochialism are unequipped and unqualified to teach in higher education.

Doctrine means teaching. Originally, a doctorate stood for teacher - not physician. The physicians decided they needed more status, so they began calling themselves M.D. - doctor of medicine. That is not considered a doctorate. Many of the same medical schools offer a PhD as well.

Our son's godfather, a dear friend until he died, earned an M.D. and a PhD from Yale Medical School, where Mrs. Ichabod and I both worked. I was a lowly Xerox guy at the medical library. She was a researcher for a famous author. Since we were both at the medical school at various times, I often brought LI in a baby carrier, so he also wandered the narrow but impressive stacks of the library, amusing the medical students.

The three professional degrees are law, medicine, and theology. They are practical degrees. Lawyers and physicians decided to give themselves doctorates, so lawyers  are J.D. (Juris Doctor, doctor of law) instead of being a bachelor of law. Ministers upgraded their degree to MDiv. Some even paid for new diplomas to be printed.

The seminaries learned they could make big money by selling a DMin to lazy pastors - a quickie degree with no academic standards. The Church Growth frauds in WELS have their DMins from various absurd schools, from Fuller on down. But the fraudsters call this a "doctorate" rather than a scam.

Larry Olson will not answer a question in class unless he is addressed as Dr. Olson! The students should say "Dee-Min Olson..." and laugh.

The original, genuine doctorate was the Doctor of Philosophy, PhD, which meant someone was qualified to teach philosophy and theology at the university level. Luther earned one at a Catholic school - imagine that. Chemnitz was required to earn one in order to serve as a bishop.

Today, all LCMS District Popes have themselves anointed with an honorary doctorate, so everyone has to call them "Dr" Poobah, bowing in awe before them.



All pastors should be teachers. That is a requirement - apt to teach. A scholar is not someone with a degree, but someone who is studious. Scholar comes from the Greek word "leisure," meaning that a scholar does research when others are watching the Packers on their TVs.

But most ministers are too lazy to study, and congregations make them social directors of the Love Boat rather than scholars.

I hate to disappoint the Appleton bullies, but I do not teach for any denomination, any parochial school. When someone earns an MA in religion, it is the study of one aspect of religion. Uncle John Brug did not have to join the United Church of Christ to attend a seminar in Old Testament studies at Yale. Nor did he have to agree with any prevalent notions there.

The Mequon faculty members have been acquiring real degrees, thanks to the low enrollment there. One waits with eager longing for Glende to denounce the faculty at the Sausage Factory for their ecumenical graduate work.

Dave Peters, one of the WELS enforcers, studied at a Jesuit school, Marquette. He wanted to know about teaching in higher education. I pointed out that his STM from Mequon was worthless. So sad.

WELS has a habit of roaring against anyone who steps on their tender toes. And people have a habit of laughing at WELS. They laugh when they know about the felony arrests, plea bargains, embezzlements, and other more shameful acts. WELS has one lecture subject always in mind - Holy Mother WELS: submit or be damned.

My task is simply to teach Luther's doctrine - to point people to Luther and the Book of Concord, because they are faithful witnesses to God's Word. That always inflames from wolves in sheep's clothing. They want to murder and strangle the flock at a leisurely pace, unmolested while they molest.

I am a teacher of God's Word. Those who want to hear God's Word are happy to be pointed to good sources, to be warned against false teachers.



UOJ Little Boys Club


Brett Meyer wrote to me about how immature the UOJ crowd is. That conclusion is difficult to avoid, given their behavior.

Their two favorite gathering places are prime examples. They are always offended at LaughQuest and the Glende blog. The two pitiful efforts have one person in common - LCMS' Paul McCain. Neither group minds that his blog is almost completely copied from other sources. His "original" posts are prime examples of outright plagiarism (giving no credit to the author) and disguised plagiarism, where he implies at the conclusion that someone else's work was a source for his own original work. Giving the origin of plagiarism does not expunge the crime - it only makes it worse.

Both UOJ sites claim to be Lutheran, but they do not seem bothered by McCain using Roman Catholic propaganda as "his" posts. He even links his RC plagiarism on LutherQuest LaughQuest. The same Pietists who rage against everyone have no problems with this, whether they are led by Cascione or Glende. They should be in-censed, pardon the pun.

Those little boys who never grow up are bullies, bullies who operate in a gang because of their cowardice. I heard from Savoy that the congregation lost its energy because everything had to be Glende's way or else. That sounds like the pastor who excommunicated the member and fired the circuit pastor who dared to identify his sins.

I have a photo from The CORE when it was at the movie theater. "We will do anything short of sin to reach the lost." Left unsaid is the author of those words - Craig Groeschel, Methodist Evangelical Covenant. But UOJ says everyone is saved - no matter. People whispered around in awe - Ski will do anything short of sin to reach the lost. That must have been - to reach lost WELS members from local congregations.

Another part of the deception - The CORE is not a congregation but just another part of St. Peter Cares.com, Freedom, Wisconsin. But Ski is not on the website as a staff member. WELS has been using smoke and mirrors for all their Church and Change congregations. The idea is to siphon off members from established churches to fund the new Emergent Church. DP Patterson is doing that in Round Rock and his disciple in Indianapolis.

That is the fundamental flaw with UOJ, because the dogma contradicts God's Word. In Christian doctrine, God's Word is perfect psychology - not the theories of Freud the coke-head fraud. UOJ hardens the heart by giving everyone--but not really--universal forgiveness and salvation. Not really because - the UOJ fraudsters are always pronouncing "Anathema sit!" on anyone in their way. That means they can lie, cheat, steal, and prey upon others while sitting in the Pharisees' judgment seat.

UOJ spa.


Pastor Nathan Bickel - Reviewing Luther's Sermon




“Sermon Homework” Review Of:

Ichabod's Posting of Luther's Sermon on "The Rich Man and Lazarus" - FIRST SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY - 1523-24 - Taken from one of the 8 Pamphlet Editions

Please note:  Luther’s words in blue


PART I - THE RICH MAN

The Rich Man Does Not Possess True Religion:

The rich man in the parable told by Christ did not possess true religion. As Luther intimates, he was engrossed with himself and surrounded himself with an easy, lazy and sumptuous life. He was self absorbed - narcissistic - continually sinning against the First Commandment.

Secondly, the rich man not only sinned against God; he sinned against his neighbor. The parable makes obvious his sins of omission. The rich man failed miserably in that he did not practice genuine religion:

"Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, to visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world."  James 1:27 - Also:  Matthew 5:8

The Rich Man's Sins Against God and His Neighbor - Sins Against the First and Second Table of the Law:

The rich man sins against the God who created him and sins against Lazarus, another priceless soul, created by God. But, (however) these sins against God's Ten Commandments, they are only a natural outgrowth of the inherited sin nature and the overt (natural) capacity to continue to sin, according to the Adamic nature. [Romans 3:23 ; Romans 5:12]



What, Essentially, Damns the Rich Man?

The rich man's damning sin, is that he did not listen when he had the opportunity to hear God's Word - as mentioned in the parable, as the Word was, "Moses and the Prophets." It was his sin of omission, not giving heed to the divine revelation which finally did this rich man's soul, eternally, in! By failing to hear and listen, the rich man was settled in unbelief. Today, is no different as people in modern day culture are too self absorbed with themselves and their own creature comforts, - not only neglecting God's due worship [from them] but so self absorbed that the love of their neighbor is virtually unseen by their blinded spiritual eyes. This is what Luther says, of such:

"....For whoever feels the goodness of God, feels also for the misfortune of his neighbor; but whoever is not conscious of the goodness of God, sympathizes not in the misfortune of his neighbor....."

Luther also illustrates in this sermon that the rich man's faith in God is nil, - else he would have had compassion upon Lazarus who was suffering (right) outside his mansion dwelling. Here, Luther makes another astute observation:

"....So we see now in the example of the rich man that it is impossible to love, where no faith exists,....Yea, here you see that there is nothing slinder and more unmerciful than unbelief. For here the dogs, the most irascible animals, are more merciful to poor Lazarus than this rich man, and they recognize the need of the poor man and lick his sores; while the obdurate, blinded hypocrite is so hard hearted that he does not wish him to have the crumbs that fell from his table....."




PART 2 - POOR LAZARUS

Luther takes for granted the faith of Lazarus. And, why shouldn't he? Lazarus ended up in heaven, but the rich man in hell because of his unbelief. Luther references Hebrews 11:6 - "For without faith it is impossible to please God." The parable does not mention Lazarus' faith. It doesn't have to. From the destination end of both souls, it is obvious that Lazarus possessed a genuine faith and the rich man was bereft of any saving faith.

Luther continues with the personification of a goddess looking favorably upon the riches of the rich man whereas God is pleased with the sores and sufferings of poor Lazarus. Luther goes on to say that in the world - even now, there are people suffering, yet the rich are blind to that reality. So the parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man is played over and over in modern times.

Luther observes:

"All believers are like poor Lazarus; and every believer is a true Lazarus, for he is of the same faith, mind and will, as Lazarus. And whoever will not be a Lazarus, will surely have his portion with the rich glutton in the flames of hell."

Luther mentions that true believers, even though they may not be visited with the physical afflictions as Lazarus, these true believers have the same mind and heart as dear Lazarus. Luther states:

"So Abraham also, although he had not the poverty and affliction of Lazarus, yet he had the mind and will to bear what Lazarus did, if God had visited him thus."

Luther concludes Part 2 with the following astute observation:

"Thus is set forth the sum and meaning of the Gospel that we may see how faith everywhere saves and unbelief condemns.




PART 3 - QUESTIONS SUGGESTED AND ANSWERED

Question 1 - Luther explains the "bosom of Abraham:"

.....To answer this, it is necessary to know that the soul or spirit of man has no rest or place where it may abide, except the Word of God, until he comes at the last day to the clear vision of God. Therefore we conclude that the bosom of Abraham signifies nothing else than the Word of God, where Christ was promised, Genesis 22:18, to Abraham, namely: “In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed.”......Thus were all the fathers before the birth of Christ carried into Abraham’s bosom; that is, at their death they were established in this saying of God, and they fell asleep in the same, they were embraced and guarded as in a bosom, and sleep there until the day of judgment; excepting those,. who have already risen with Christ, as Matthew 27:52 teaches, where they also remained.....

Luther then contrasts the righteous, which have died in the Faith with those of unbelievers:

.....For just as Abraham’s bosom is God’s Word, in which believers rest through faith, and fall asleep and are guarded there until the day of judgment; so must that on the contrary ever be hell, where God’s Word is not, into which the unbelievers are cast until the day of judgment. That can be nothing else than an empty, unbelieving, sinful, and evil conscience.....

Question 2 - Luther explains the “conversation” between the Rich Man and Abraham:

Since both bodies were in the grave, the conversation was not one of voice but of "consciousness." Referring to the request of the Rich Man to Abraham to warn his family of hell, Luther comments:

.....These are the thoughts of despair, when the conscience feels that the Word of God is withdrawn forever from him; accordingly the thoughts of his conscience rage and would gladly have the living to know that such are the agonies of death, and he craves that someone would tell it to them.....But it is to no purpose; for he feels an answer in his own conscience, that Moses and the prophets are sufficient, whom they ought to believe, as he himself should have done. All such thoughts pass between the condemned conscience and the Word of God, in the hour of death or in the agonies of death;

Question 3 – Re: The time element of eternal judgment - [Luther]: "When did that take place, and if the rich man still daily without ceasing suffers thus until the day of judgment?"

Luther does not have an answer for this, as Scripture does not tell us. Luther does refer to the relativity of time, but then ends up saying:

"....Therefore it seems to me that in this rich man we have an example of the future of all unbelievers, when their eyes are opened by death and its agonies; which can endure but for a moment and then cease until the day of judgment, as it may please God; for here no definite rule can be established.....

Question 4 - About "praying for the dead:"

Luther has a two part answer:

a) "We have no command from God to pray for the dead; therefore no one sins by not praying for them; for what God does not bid or forbid us to do, in that no one can sin."

b) As far as the dead's "final" judgment, Luther's answer about prayer for the dead is, as follows:

"......Now since it is uncertain and no one knows, whether final judgment has been passed upon these souls, it is not sin if you pray for them; but in this way, that you let it rest in uncertainty and speak thus: Dear God, if the departed souls be in a state that they may yet be helped, then I pray that thou wouldst be gracious. And when you have thus prayed once or twice, then let it be sufficient and commend them unto God. For God has promised that when we pray to him for anything he would hear us. Therefore when you have prayed once or twice, you should believe that your prayer is answered, and there let it rest, lest you tempt God and mistrust him......"

Having stated thus, [in the aforementioned] Luther frowns on continued prayer:

".....masses, vigils and prayers to be repeated forever for the dead every year, as if God had not heard us the year before, is the work of Satan and is death itself, where God is mocked by unbelief, and such prayers are nothing but blasphemy of God.”

Luther further observes (although not using the word) that "séances" are not according to Scripture, - since:

".....No soul has yet since the beginning of the world reappeared on the earth, and it is not God’s will that it should be so. For here in this Gospel you see that Abraham declares that no one can be sent from the dead to teach the living; but he points them to the Word of God in the Scriptures, Deuteronomy 31: “They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.” By these words Abraham turns to the command of God in Deuteronomy 18:11, where God says: “Thou shalt not be a consulter with a familiar spirit.” Isaiah 8:19......."

Luther ends his sermon by dispelling his day's superstition of ghosts and haunted dwellings - one with a story of Gregory, the Bishop of Cappadocia.



Pastor Bickel's quick summation:

Excellent sermon by Luther! [Aren’t most, if not all?]  Every Christian pastor, Christian and heathen would benefit. [The unbeliever would benefit, at least to the extent that he would be warned of his future eternal damning predicament, baring repentance and faith]

 Luther's adept reliance upon the Word is captivating. He always returns to "faith." After all, it is "faith" which [only] pleases God. [Hebrews 11:6] It is by God’s grace through faith, in which we are justified and thus are able to receive the crown of glory, as Lazarus did.

The "key" to this parable of Christ, is, essentially, the Word - "Moses and the Prophets." To the Rich Man, those were the Scriptures of his day, the divine revelation to which he did not take heed – (which was manifest in the Rich Man’s temporal lifestyle and sins of omission). He was condemned because of his unbelief in those Scriptures, - whereas Lazarus was a suffering servant of the Lord, who believed. He had nothing to offer His Lord but his patient suffering. To him the words of 1 Peter 1 would apply:

"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you, Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time. Wherein ye greatly rejoice, though now for a season, if need be, ye are in heaviness through manifold temptations: That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ: Whom having not seen, ye love; in whom, though now ye see him not, yet believing, ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory..." [1 Peter 1:3-8 - KJV]

Take my life and let it be; consecrated, Lord, to Thee.
Take my moments and my days; let them flow in ceaseless praise.

Take my love, my Lord, I pour; at Thy feet its treasure store;
Take myself, and I will be, ever, only, all for Thee.
[TLH  - “Take My Life and Let It Be” – CPH ; c.1941 – Verses 1 & 6]

Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org

www..moralmatters.org

P.S.  -  Dr. Jackson – Thanks for providing the opportunity to review one of Luther’s sermons! I thoroughly enjoyed it! It was a good exercise!