Vatican in flux
HDS professor discusses pope’s departure, possible successors
Harvard Staff Writer
Monday, February 11, 2013
Courtesy of Harvard Divinity School
In addressing the departure of Pope Benedict XVI, Harvard Divinity School Professor Francis Schüssler Fiorenza said he didn't believe the cardinals would select someone from the U.S. "I think the United States is a superpower and it has so much of an important role in world politics, that to have the pope identified with the United States, I think from a political religious standpoint, is a no-go," he said.
In a shocking move, Pope Benedict XVI announced Monday he would step down at the end of the month, citing age (85) and health issues. Francis Schüssler Fiorenza, a professor of Roman Catholic theological studies at the Divinity School, spoke with the Gazette’s Colleen Walsh about the resignation — the first in six centuries — and possible successors.
GAZETTE: There is no precedent for replacing a living pope in the modern era. How do you think the process will proceed?
FIORENZA: I don’t think the procedure is much different … within nine days, or so many days, the cardinals who are under 80 would be called together by [Cardinal Angelo] Sodano, who is the head of the College of Cardinals, and then they have a vote for the new pope. So in a sense, the procedure for electing a new pope hasn’t changed. What some of us are speculating is: [Pope Benedict XVI] obviously can’t be a part of the conclave because he is over age, so will he try indirectly to influence who he likes or doesn’t like as a successor? That is the interesting question.
GAZETTE: Is there anyone you think he would like to see as his successor?
FIORENZA: That is a difficult question. He has defended Cardinal [Tarcisio] Bertone, his secretary of state, against criticism, but I think he is too old [78] to be considered if they go for a younger person. [Austrian Cardinal Christoph] Schönborn has been a student of his and friend.
GAZETTE: Can you describe the papal conclave process?
FIORENZA: John Paul II [changed the rules] so that after so many votes all you needed was a majority … Benedict changed the rules back to the original rules, and the original rules state you need a two-thirds majority. Now that’s really important. … This means you’ve got to elect someone whom at least two-thirds would agree upon, so if a conservative majority gets 51 percent, then they could have forced [the person] through. … That you’ve got to get someone that two-thirds would agree upon is a good decision.
GAZETTE: Would the cardinals ever select someone from the United States?
FIORENZA: I don’t think anyone from the United States stands a chance. I think the United States is a superpower and it has so much of an important role in world politics, that to have the pope identified with the United States, I think from a political religious standpoint, is a no-go. So I don’t think [New York Cardinal Timothy] Dolan, [Archbishop of Los Angeles José H.] Gomez, anybody from the United States stands a chance. Maybe 100 years from now.
GAZETTE: Potential candidates?
FIORENZA: Cardinal Peter Turkson of Ghana, heads justice and peace at the Vatican. Argentine [Cardinal] Leonardo Sandri, now heading the Vatican department for Eastern Churches. Cardinal João Braz de Aviz from Brazil. Cardinal Marc Ouellet of Quebec.
GAZETTE: What would it mean if the next pope were not from Europe? How would that impact the influence of the leadership? Would it reflect a real shift in power?
FIORENZA: I do not think it will reflect a shift in power immediately. Several of the names mentioned have appointments in Rome. It will lead more to a cultural change and perhaps in time a power change. Christianity has been identified with Western if not European civilization, especially European colonization. Such an appointment would then be a shift and over time a change.
GAZETTE: Many liberals complain that Benedict was too conservative. How will that reputation affect the selection of the next pope?
FIORENZA: [John Paul II and Benedict XVI] tended to appoint more traditional bishops, and that I think will have an influence. Remember that under Paul VI, Vatican II wanted to deal with the issue of birth control and Paul VI removed it from the council and set up a commission, and then the commission of cardinals came out and recommended that the church change its position on birth control. Then Paul VI disagreed with the commission and said “I refuse to accept this, because to accept this would admit that the previous popes were wrong.” … There were enormous protests [around the] world, of a lot of bishops saying “If you are a Catholic, follow your own conscience.” The papacy under Paul VI was furious, as was John Paul II, so that they often asked bishops if they support the pope on birth control. And … what’s the one thing the American bishops are concerned about? It’s birth control in terms of Obamacare, and they have a very conservative position. So I think the legacy will be that you have a much more conservative episcopacy now than you had, let us say, 50 years ago, and that’s clear in the United States. [Benedict’s legacy] would be to continue John Paul II’s appointing of conservative bishops and ultimately cardinals, and that is going to have an impact on the election, I would assume.
GAZETTE: How important is the Vatican’s relationship with other religions? John Paul II and and Benedict XVI made some inroads there.
FIORENZA: Many felt that Benedict didn’t go far enough, because he was very much concerned about religious relativism, and he was always warning about pluralism. And so the biggest question that they are now facing is where the church is changing. If you look at the United States or you look at Europe, [you see] many marriages that are taking place that [are] “mixed marriages.” I once read statistics that right after World War II, both in the United States and Germany, nine out of 10 Catholics married fellow Catholics. And now [in the United States] … around eight of 10 Catholics are marrying either Protestants [or people from] other religions. And that type of switch is leading to a type of religious pluralism that the church is not used to. … So I think the question of religious pluralism is going to be really important, especially if you get a pope from Asia, where you have more awareness of other world religions.
The Center for the Study of World Religions (CSWR) at Harvard Divinity School will host an open discussion on the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI as part of the center’s “Religion in the News” series. The event will be held Friday (Feb. 15) from noon to 1 p.m. in the CSWR Common Room, 42 Francis Ave., Cambridge. The event is open to Harvard faculty, staff, and students only. Due to limited space and the possibility of high turnout, RSVPs are appreciated. Please contact Lexi Gewertz,
'via Blog this'
***
GJ - I took a course from Frank and another course from his wife Elisabeth. Frank was definitely in the Liberation Theology camp (regurgitated Marxism) and his wife was already known for being a feminist theologian. Notre Dame did not want either ideology at the time, so they were edged out.
Frank and his wife had to live apart for a period of time, but both of them got the big prize with endowed professorships at Harvard.
---
churchmousec (http://churchmousec.wordpress.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Vatican in flux | Harvard Gazette - Ichabod's Theo...":
Thank you for the extra information at the end.
Before reading that, I'd checked Fiorenza's Harvard bio (alarm bells):
'His writings on political theology engage recent theories of justice, especially those of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas, and have dealt with issues of work and welfare.'
Then, at the end, something I'd not heard of (but had adopted myself whilst I was in Christian spiritual wilderness from Catholic high school in the 1970s until the late 2000s -- still attending church at that time, too):
'twentieth-century Roman Catholic theology, namely, the direction known as la nouvelle théologie.'
I'd not heard of 'la nouvelle théologie' as such but it is updated Modernism (explored here -- cfnews.org/gg-newtheo.htm):
- truth is always in a state of becoming
- man ought not to rest in the dogmas of religion
- Adam is a collective
- the Incarnation of the Word would be merely a moment in universal evolution
Overall, it is a 'theology [with] a contrary meaning to that of the teaching of the Councils of Orange and Trent'.
I know any number of mainline Protestants who would align themselves with the aforementioned points.
This quote was particularly pertinent --
'The[se] writings ... are much read in France. It is true that they exercise a huge influence on the average type of soul.'
Apologies for hogging the comments space here. I'll follow up on my site.
Thank you again, Dr Jackson. I learned something new today.
Churchmouse
PS -- Also appreciate your mention of my cholesterol post on your Bethany site!
***
GJ - You are welcome, Sir Mouse.
Frank and I did not agree about theology or theologians. He loved Paul Tillich's work. I read aloud a passage from a new Tillich biography that identified the idol as a pagan. Even his peers at Union Seminary considered Tillich a pagan, the bio said.
