Saturday, March 16, 2013

LCMS in Bed with ELCA for Malaria Fund, Plus the Disaster of Vouchers

Malaria? He has berry-berry.


bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Mary Thompson -- Wrong Turn on the Road to School":

Vouchers are one of the worst ideas to hit the church, and I'll explain why in a moment. First, think about the malaria project of the LCMS and ELCA and Ted Turner. Turner would only fork out $75 million for Africa if the synods matched the funds. What a better way of voluntarily draining the church of funds! It's the modern day equivalent of Charles the VII liquidating the monasteries, the French Revolution liquidating the RCC in France, or the Austrian empire liquidating the contemplating monasteries under Emperor Joseph. It's getting the church to do what the UN ought to be doing with nations that commit tax monies to the UN projects. That's similar to Harrison's Mercy Journeys giving away money to disaster victims without preaching the gospel to the recipients. Why not let FEMA or the UN do that? The church ought not do any charity in a secular manner, but must always pair charity with a sermon at least. Two days after the victims receive money, they probably don't even remember what the LCMS or WELS acronyms stand for!

So the reason the vouchers are bad is they are always worth less than what it costs to teach the students. So the state is saying that the church schools can teach public school students, but must pay $2,000 or more per student for the privilege. Furthermore, the school cannot force any pupil to hear the gospel while in school, but must allow them to opt out of chapel, and nothing can be said in the classroom! Anyway, Jeske's school has drained the Lutheran churches' coffers, and this has contributed to the high price of tuition in WELS and LCMS schools, and the great student loan debt of WLC students and LCMS students in the state. Moreover, not much is sent to the LCMS seminaries from WI to aid WI seminary students.

ELCA's Luther Seminary - Too Big To Fail?

"A blessing for Ichabod in this program?
Oh yes, Gracious Heavenly Father,
bless and keep Ichabod
far away from us."
---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "ELCA's Luther Seminary - Too Big To Fail?":

Wow look at the gigantic crucifix on Rev. Wilken, is he trying to say he is more spiritual by that?

Looks like he is wearing the large one to ward off Evangelicals.

LPC

---

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "ELCA's Luther Seminary - Too Big To Fail?":

In the pics with McCain, Weedon et al (above), I notice the large crucifix that Wilken is wearing on a neck chain appear to be made to mount on a wall. I guess he didn't read the label on the package at CPH.

***

GJ - Processional crosses were on sale at Fortress, Bruce and Lito.

---

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "ELCA's Luther Seminary - Too Big To Fail?":

Lito, your comment wasn't posted (hadn't been approved) when I made my comment, so we both thought the same thing independently about one particular detail of this post, which is very coincidental considering how info-laden this particular post was.

"I am so glad I could rig the baby-cam
so I could watch kitty playing while I'm gone."

"My new app counts carbs for me,
and has The Catholic Encyclopedia as the home page for Internet Explorer."

http://www.ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2012/12/richard-bliese-resigns-as-president-of.html


bruce-church said...

I like how the Luther Sem president had to leave after the seminary lost a mere $4 million, but for years student debt has been rising, and that was a-o-kay with the seminary regents.

====

http://www.startribune.com/183099441.html?refer=y

School announces search for new president after losing nearly $4 million last school year.

=========

http://www.luthersem.edu/about/quickfacts.aspx

Tuition and living expenses
$15,000 annually for full-time study
$32,870* annually for full-time study, living expenses and books
*Reflects cost for students living on campus and reflects the 2012-13 academic year

Student debt
31% graduate without seminary debt
69% graduate with seminary debt
Median indebtedness is $42,279
Financial information is current as of October 2012 and is based upon the 2012-13 fiscal year.
bruce-church said...

The only candidate left for the Luther Seminary presidency resigns after it is revealed in the student newspaper that's he's a LCMS member. Could that be because many Luther Seminary M.Div. students looking to go into the ministry are women. 46% of the seminary students are women, and they only have a small music ministry program there, so one can guess most of them are ministerial students. Moreover, the big fad on campus there is multiculturalism and anti-racism. Also, one seminary student was a Lutheran pastor who has conducted numerous same-sex marriages in the past, and even wrote a letter to the new pope about the subject in 2010:

http://steadfastlutherans.org/?p=28005

===========

http://www.luthersem.edu/about/quickfacts.aspx
Male/female enrollment

54% male
46% female

============

Students cultivate anti-racist, multicultural identities:

http://www.luthersem.edu/gmi/newsletter/article.aspx?article_id=92&issue_id=11

==============

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2013/03/14/mn-man-has-papal-connection-over-hot-button-issue/

Now studying at Luther Seminary, [Andrew] Albertsen sent an email from St. Paul when Bergoglio made harsh statements about gay marriage in 2010.

“I told him whenever you say something about gay marriage, think about that you are also issuing a judgment about me,” Albertsen said.

============

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blessing_of_same-sex_unions_in_Christian_churches#cite_note-24

Argentina: The Danish Church in Buenos Aires performs marriages between same-sex couples.[24]

Footnote 24: 2 June 2010).

"A church blesses gay couples who want to give themselves to God. La Nacion (Buenos Aires). Retrieved 25 July 2012. "However, not all Protestant churches have the same position. Such is the case of the Danish Lutherans, whose temples are blessed unions of same-sex couples and from which it is supported gay marriage in Argentina. in fact, in Buenos Aires, Roberto Pastor Andrew Albertsen, held in a five religious civil unions between same-sex and hopes to do the same with the marriage, if they are enabled in civil matters. "

===============

http://www.normaboecklerart.com


***
Robert Jenson, ELCA apostate.
He longs to pope.
 GJ -

 PS on Robert Jenson, Luther College, once conservative:


Robert Jenson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lutheranism
Lutherrose.svg
Luther's Rose
 Lutheranism portal
Robert W. Jenson (born 1930, Eau Claire, Wisconsin) is a leading American Lutheran andecumenical theologian.

Contents

  [hide

[edit]Student years

Jenson studied classics and philosophy at Luther College in the late 1940s, before beginning theological studies at Luther Seminary in 1951. Due to a car accident he missed most of his first-year seminary studies, and during that year he immersed himself in the works of Kant and Kierkegaard. Jenson began reading historical-critical scholars like Hermann Gunkel and Sigmund Mowinckel, and as a result he became deeply interested in the biblical texts and in the theological significance of the Old Testament.
At Luther Seminary, Jenson was assistant to the renowned orthodox Lutheran theologian, Herman Preus. Preus infused Jenson with an admiration for the theology of post-Reformation Lutheran scholasticism, and with a strong belief in the orthodox Lutheran understanding of predestination. Against the majority of the staff at Luther Seminary at that time, who believed that God elected individuals to salvation on the basis of "foreseen faith", Preus held that God had decreed the salvation of a definite number of the elect, without a decree of reprobation. Other influences at Luther Seminary included Edmund Smits, who introduced Jenson to the work of Augustine, and fellow-student Gerhard Forde, who introduced him to the work of Rudolf Bultmann. While studying at seminary, Jenson also met and married Blanche Rockne, who became one of the major stimuli for his theological work (one of his later books includes a dedication to Blanche, "the mother of all my theology"[1]).
After seminary, Jenson taught in the department of religion and philosophy at Luther College from 1955 to 1957, before moving toHeidelberg for doctoral studies in 1957-58. Though he had planned to write his dissertation on Bultmann, his supervisor, Peter Brunner, advised him to work on Karl Barth's doctrine of election. Thus Jenson worked on Barth's theology at Heidelberg, and he also studied nineteenth-century German theology and philosophy, partly with the help of the new Heidelberg lecturer, Wolfhart Pannenberg. He also attended a seminar there with Martin Heidegger (and, during a later visit to Heidelberg, with Hans-Georg Gadamer). Even more significantly, at Heidelberg he became friends with another young Lutheran scholar, Carl Braaten, who would later become his "chief theological companion"[2] and his most important theological collaborator.

[edit]Early career

Jenson's doctoral dissertation (revised and published in 1963 as Alpha and Omega) was completed in Basel, with Barth's approval, and so Jenson returned to Luther College, where he continued to study Barth while also developing an increasing interest in the philosophy of Hegel. The faculty of the religion department was uncomfortable with Jenson's theological liberalism, and his openness to biblical criticism and evolutionary biology was strongly condemned. When the college failed to force Jenson's retirement, several professors from the religion and biology departments resigned in protest. From 1960 to 1966, Jenson was thus left with the task of helping to rebuild an entire religion department, and he became especially involved in the development of a new philosophy department.[3] During these years, he also wrote A Religion against Itself (1967), which sharply critiqued the American religious culture of the 1960s.
Jenson finally left Luther College to spend three years as Dean and Tutor of Lutheran Studies at Mansfield CollegeOxford University.[4]Here he was able to focus for the first time on teaching theology, and he was deeply influenced by his encounters with Anglicanism and with ecumenical worship. The three years at Oxford marked a creative and productive period in Jenson's career. In The Knowledge of Things Hoped For (1969), he sought to integrate the traditions of European hermeneutics and English analytical philosophy, while also drawing on patristic and medieval theologians such as Origen and Thomas Aquinas. And in God after God (1969), he sought to go beyond the "death of God" theology by emphasizing the actualism and futurity of God's being. The proposal advanced in God after Godwas in many respects parallel to the new "theology of hope" that was being developed at the time in Germany by young scholars likeJürgen Moltmann and Wolfhart Pannenberg. At Oxford, Jenson also supervised the doctoral work of Colin Gunton, who went on to become one of Great Britain's most distinguished and influential systematic theologians.
From Oxford, Jenson returned to America in 1968 and took up a position at the Lutheran Seminary in Gettysburg. His work here focused in part on distinctively Lutheran themes, especially in the books Lutheranism (1976) and Visible Words (1978). He also began to engage deeply with patristic thought (especially with Gregory of NyssaCyril of Alexandria, and Maximus the Confessor), which led him to develop a creative new proposal for trinitarian theology in The Triune Identity (1982).
Further, as a result of his encounter with Anglicanism at Oxford, Jenson was appointed to the first round of Lutheran-Episcopal ecumenical dialogue in 1968. This was the beginning of his long involvement with the ecumenical movement, which would deeply shape his later theology. With George Lindbeck, he became involved in the Roman Catholic-Lutheran dialogue; and in 1988, he spent time at the Institute for Ecumenical Research at Strasbourg. Throughout his career, Jenson's theology continued to move in an increasingly Catholic, conservative and ecumenical direction. He interacted extensively with the work of Catholic theologians like Joseph Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI) and Hans Urs von Balthasar, and with Eastern Orthodox theologians like Maximus the ConfessorJohn Zizioulas and Vladimir Lossky.

[editLater career

After two decades of teaching at Lutheran Theological Seminary in Gettysburg, Jenson moved in 1988 to the religion department of St. Olaf College in Northfield, Minnesota. He was joined in Northfield by his friend Carl Braaten, and together they founded the conservative Center for Catholic and Evangelical Theology[5] in 1991. The founding of this Center marked a new period of intensive ecumenical involvement for Jenson: with Braaten, he organized numerous ecumenical conferences, and began publishing the theological journal Pro Ecclesia.
Jenson continued to teach at St. Olaf College until 1998, when he retired and took up a position as Senior Scholar for Research at the Center for Theological Inquiry[6] in Princeton, New Jersey. Before leaving St. Olaf College, he completed work on his magnum opus, the two-volume Systematic Theology (1997–99), which has since been widely regarded as one of the most important and creative recent works of systematic theology. In a review of this work, Wolfhart Pannenberg described Jenson as "one of the most original and knowledgeable theologians of our time".[7]
Jenson currently resides in Princeton, NJ.

SEPARATION FROM THE UNGODLY WORLD : Apprising Ministries



SEPARATION FROM THE UNGODLY WORLD : Apprising Ministries:

"As a reader of Apprising Ministries, no doubt you’ll see that I often point you to teachings written by men who lived in the 1800′s of before. There’s a very simple reason; I’m a pastor who adhere’s to Biblical Christianity.

Since the man-centered spiritual Trojan Horse of the neo-liberal cult of the Emerging Church was embraced and unloaded within mainstream evangelicalism circa 1997, you’re hearing less and less about the genuine Christian Faith."

'via Blog this'


Congregation locked out of church building.
For a How-To on This, Write DP Jon-Boy Buchholz

paramus3
"Hey! We are not in a WELS district!
We're not even LCMS!"

Congregation locked out of church building:


Members of a community church in Paramus, N.J., are in a state of disbelief over this week’s confiscation of their beloved church building, built and paid for by members of the church back in 1929.

This past Sunday, the body of believers of the Community Church of Faith and Hope, with a congregation closing in on 100 strong, met in the building for what appears to be the last time.


Ads by Google
DiLab AccuSampler
Worldwide used instrument for Automated Blood Sampling
www.dilab.com
Want to Become a Pastor?
Earn Your Religious Degree at Home. Request Free Program Info Today.
eLearners.com/Religious_Studies
Monday morning a locksmith hired by the Christian & Missionary Alliance locked the church members out of their building after the New Jersey Court of Appeals ruled that the denomination has every right to exercise a “reversionary” clause, and take the valuable property away from local members.

Although the court ruling clearly gives the congregation until March 18 to turn over the keys to the building, the CMA didn’t wait, and shuttered the building, personal possessions and all, first thing Monday morning.

While the church members are shocked by the property confiscation, they are more bewildered that the Christian Missionary Alliance denomination would act in such a way toward fellow believers.

“We haven’t been treated very Christ-like by the Christian Missionary Alliance,” says Pastor Joseph Smaha, whose battle-weary congregation can’t believe the beloved church of A.B. Simpson would behave in such a way.

Conference officials did not respond to WND requests for comment.

WND reported a year ago about the dispute between the small community church in suburban New Jersey, and the Metropolitan District of the CMA, led by Bruce Terpstra.

The conference had determined the church was dying, so ownership of the property and all of the congregation’s assets must be turned over to the denomination.

“Not so,” the pastor of the church, Smaha tells WND.

“There has never been any indication that our church is ‘dying’,” he says. “On the contrary, our body has been growing by leaps and bounds.”

Smaha tells WND that the average attendance has been approaching 100 for quite awhile.

“Our congregation is vibrant, in love with Jesus, and growing steadily, with new people coming in every week,” he says. “What’s more exciting than that is the people receiving Jesus as Lord through our outreach.”

In fact, Smaha tried to explain how healthy the congregation was to Terpstra and Fred Henry, a regional director for the CMA, but the Christian pastor was told, “You could be making the numbers up.”

Smaha urged the pair to come visit the church and “observe the great work that God is doing here,” but his offers were declined.

WND visited the small church for a worship service and observed large numbers in attendance. Far more than the CMA constitution calls for in downgrading a church to “developing.”

Insisting that the congregation is not “viable,” conference officials dispatched a rebuttal to one WND report that said:

“Because we rely so heavily on the Internet as a source of information that is often unverifiable, we must exercise great caution in what we choose to accept as truth. More than any other generation, we must read Internet articles with great discernment and a healthy dose of skepticism. The sworn enemy of Christ’s church has vowed to stop at nothing to bring about its demise. And the use of media has become a frequent weapon of choice.” – From a CMA letter to pastors.

The Christian Missionary Alliance turned to the courts when congregation members raised objections to turning over the building which they had built and paid for before joining the CMA.

One pastor that WND spoke with, Joseph Broz, told WND that the denomination literally told him they didn’t owe him any prayer while they were attempting to take away his church in Pennsylvania, in a similar fashion.

Broz told WND in an interview that he nearly died in an accident, and the CMA District Superintendent Wayne Spriggs refused to even pass along a prayer request for the injured man.

In the midst of his battle with the C&MA, Broz was in a serious car accident that left him in critical condition. His son, an EMT, emailed C&MA District Superintendent Wayne Spriggs asking for prayer for Broz, saying, “it doesn’t look good.”

Broz told WND, “Spriggs later admitted to him that he never passed on the prayer request, because unbeknownst [to him], Spriggs had revoked the pastor’s credentials due to the property battle, saying, ‘We didn’t owe you any prayer.’”

Broz tells WND that removing a pastor’s credentials and decimating a congregation seem to be standard for the C&MA during one of these “takeovers.”

In fact, WND has reported on several instances of “property confiscation” by the CMA, each involving the practice of exercising a “reversionary clause” in church documents.

The same method repeats itself in CMA churches across the country, and James Sundquist has produced a DVD chronicling the destruction of these churches called “Making Merchandise of Men’s Souls.”

In a number of cases, the members of the local church are shocked to find the locks on the doors to their sanctuaries changed by the CMA without warning.

In July WND reported that the Grace Community Alliance Church in Baldwin Park, Calif., was also nearly locked out of their building.

Much like the Paramus Church, the pastor of Grace Church told WND that everything was going fine at his church until the CMA District Superintendent Bill Malick decided to take the church away under the “reversionary clause.”

In that case, the church had a spotless record of paying dues to the C&MA “Great Commission Fund,” and members say they have had no issues with the district.

But the conference decided to strip the pastor of his credentials and classify the church as “development” in order to take control of the property.

“We are not in chaos, we are not in financial difficulty,” Pastor Fred Cheock of Grace Community Alliance Church told WND.

“Still, the District Superintendant Bill Malick labels us as ‘development,’ and within weeks tries to cancel all of our worship services and lock our people out of our building,” Choeck says.

Choeck and his congregation are still fighting the CMA over the property.

The pastor of the Paramus church provides WND with a similar account.

Smaha told WND that his church had no problems, and actually he hadn’t even spoken to the CMA District personnel in years.

That all changed when he called them for advice on how to biblically deal with a secretary who allegedly had embezzled thousands of dollars from the church treasury.

Smaha says “our small church was out-of-sight-out-of-mind until someone from the district realized what a nice, valuable piece of property the Paramus congregation had built up.

“Suddenly the district tells us we’re not a viable congregation, and they are invoking the reversionary clause,” he tells WND.

Smaha tells WND that the CMA took his description about how his congregation and the church had survived through lean years, even sold the parsonage to raise funds to repair the sanctuary, and twisted it into a story for a judge about how the church is no longer viable.

“Nothing could be further from the truth, but a judge wouldn’t let us present testimony, he simply ruled that the CMA can deal with its churches however they see fit.”

Smaha tells WND that the small church has been more than viable in recent years, growing from a low of about 20 in attendance to nearly 100. The church also provides a separate service for a Hispanic congregation, has money in the bank and is debt free.

Smaha said the CMA denomination never contributed a penny to the work of the local church, yet now has taken over a debt-free building that has been in the same community of believers for generations.

Smaha told WND that on top of seizing the church building, the CMA has also sent a letter this week demanding the $28,000 the church had in its checking account when this battle began.

“They also plan to sue us for court costs apparently because they feel entitled to all that money because we shouldn’t have stood up for what’s right,” he said.

“I also find it laughable that they claim we are not viable, yet admit that we are completely debt free, and have $28,000 in the bank. We are thriving, and they are lying.”

Reversionary clause

Smaha tells WND that his church was actually aware that a reversionary clause existed in church documents, but that elders from his very church questioned the CMA about it before joining the denomination in the 1990s.

“He was a nice, old World War II vet, who wanted to make sure our congregation wasn’t being taken advantage of,” Smaha tells WND.

The CMA assured this kind elder that the reversionary clause would “never, ever be invoked unless there was an extreme case of a congregational split, false teaching, or the church just closed its doors one day.”

None of which have been alleged in this case.

“Clearly, the court’s involvement in a matter of church governance would run afoul of the First Amendment,” said the recent court decision.

The court referred to the church operating as a hierarchy in its rationale for not getting involved. But Dan Wetzel, the CMA interim vice president of Church Ministries in Colorado Springs, said, “We are not a hierarchal body.”

“Defendants [the Paramus Church] ask the court to intervene in a dispute between them and the CMA. This is a matter of ‘church government’ which the Supreme Court has declared must be free of ‘secular control or manipulation’ under the First Amendment,” says the court ruling.

It was in Colorado Springs that a Chinese CMA congregation had its property seized by the conference, and sold for a karate studio.

Congregation members were heartbroken to learn that the CMA had thrown all of their expensive Chinese-language Bibles into a dumpster.

WND met up with Bruce Terpstra and the CMA attorney Hopkins at the courthouse in New Jersey.

When asked for a comment on the fight between the small church and the denomination, Hopkins replied, “We prefer to handle this situation to the glory of God’s Kingdom rather than in the media.”

Smaha tells WND that a fund has been set up to help the church, as they will now need to rent a meeting place. To help, send donations to: C/O Community Church of Faith and Hope, PO Box 683, Paramus, N.J., 07653

http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/congregation-locked-out-of-church-building/



'via Blog this'

---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Congregation locked out of church building. For a ...":

Ichabod -

This church body should consider doing what the people of Walnut Grove did in the one episode of "Little House on the Prairie." The town was bought for the railroad against the town people's will. Just before possession of the town was transacted by the man in charge of the take-over, the people of Walnut Grove demolished all the buildings with dynamite.

This one CMA church structure wouldn't take much of an effort to demolish without powder. It could be done in with sledge hammers and some heavy ropes pulled by some tough trucks. At least the demolition could offer a cathartic effect on the congregational members. The "Christian" Missionary Alliance church body then could pick up the pieces and make due with their ill-fated decision and treatment of this congregation of over 100 souls.

Nathan M. Bickel
www.thechristianmessage.org
www.moralmatters.org

***

GJ - That would be really mature. The church legally changed hands. They were locked out. Turning it to ashes would make them arsonists.

Lately, even ownership prior to a denomination existing is not enough to keep a congregation from being grabbed by lying, greedy, apostate leaders. The Episcopal Church is a prime example. Bishop Katie (not Ski's Bishop Katie) mortgaged headquarters to get money to sue anyone who opposed her. I have posted stories of congregations, with every possible legal claim to keep their property, losing to Bishop Katie and her lawyers.

Ecclesia Augustana: The Divine Liturgy: Part 1 (Introduction through the Collect of the Day)





Ecclesia Augustana: The Divine Liturgy: Part 1 (Introduction through the Collect of the Day):


Saturday, March 16, 2013


The Divine Liturgy: Part 1 (Introduction through the Collect of the Day)

In my previous articles "Liturgy is Anything but Indifferent" and "Using the Propers is Proper!," I introduced the concept of the Divine Liturgy and promised future articles highlighting the individual parts of the Liturgy.  My original goal was to dedicate a unique article to each segment of the Divine Service.  However, over the course of the past week I put together a document highlighting the various aspects of the Communion Liturgy from the Common Service for St. John Evangelical-Lutheran Church's new website (as of right now, the old site is still up, but eventually you will be able to find the new website at http://www.stjohnsmke.org).  Rather than duplicate my efforts, I'm going to cross-post the explanations in four parts at this blog as well.  I hope you find these tidbits interesting.  And be sure to check out St. John's new webpage when it's up!

--------
--------

Introduction
The Common Service, as its name implies, is the compilation of worship orders common to all of American Lutheranism.  It was published in 1888 as a joint effort between various Lutheran Church bodies and is (or was) widely used by members of the ELCA, LCMS, WELS, and ELS, among others.  As such, it represents an expression of Lutheran solidarity that is almost unparalleled.  But the Common Service was not created in 1888; in reality, it represents an English (and Lutheran) version of the Latin Mass and Divine Offices, which in one form or another are the continuation of a liturgical tradition that predates the time of Christ.  Its chief elements are Word and Sacrament; it exists to present them as a golden ring might present a priceless diamond.  At its core, the Common Service is nothing other than the Psalms, prayers, and spiritual songs (Ephesians 5:19) found in the Holy Scriptures.  In this context, it is rightly called the “Divine Service,” because it is the medium through which we receive God’s gifts.

A Note on Terms
While the Common Service was originally an umbrella term for three different orders of worship - the Communion Service, Matins, and Vespers - it has come to be associated most closely with the former of these three.  This Communion Service is often called the “Divine Service” in Lutheran practice, coming from the German word Gottesdienst.  The term developed as an acknowledgment of the Lutheran belief that the true worship of God is not focused on what we do, but rather on what God does for us, as the Apology of the Augsburg Confession says: “Faith is the latreiva [divine service], which receives the benefits offered by God; the righteousness of the Law is the latreiva [divine service] which offers to God our merits. By faith God wishes to be worshiped in this way, that we receive from Him those things which He promises and offers” (IV:49).

However, insofar as the term “Divine Service” can rightly be applied to any order of worship that presents the gifts of God, the Communion Service is often distinguished with the title “Chief Divine Service.”  It was historically known as the Mass in the Western Church, the Divine Liturgy in the East, and the Eucharist (coming from the Greek word εὐχαριστία, meaning “thanksgiving”) in both.  The Eucharistic Service can be divided into two parts:  The Service of the Word and the Service of the Sacrament.  The Service of the Word has its origins in the ancient Jewish synagogue service, which was marked by readings from the Law and Prophets (prefiguring the Epistle and Gospel lessons) and interspersed with Psalms.  In turn, the Service of the Sacrament is prefigured by the Jewish Passover Seder, from which the Lord Jesus instituted the Most Holy Supper of His very Body and Blood.  In this way, the Eucharistic Liturgy predates Christian use, since it was used by Hebrew believers even before the time of Christ.

Finally, there are two terms worth mentioning that refer to the congregational portions of the Chief Divine Service:  Ordinary and Proper.  The Ordinary refers to those portions of the Service which are “ordinarily” used week after week without change.  In the Common Service tradition, these are the Kyrie, Gloria in Excelsis, Credo, Agnus Dei, Sanctus, and Nunc Dimittis.   In contrast, the Proper refers to those portions of the Service that vary from week to week and are “proper” to the given day; these are the Introit, Gradual, Alleluia or Tract, Sequence and/or Hymn of the Day, Offertory, and Communio.  The history and liturgical use of these canticles and chants will be explained in the paragraphs that follow.

PreparationThe Preparatory or Penitential Rite exists to prepare our hearts for the Divine Service.  Its chief part is the Confiteor (meaning “I confess”), during which we confess our general sinfulness and particular sins that make us unworthy to stand in God’s presence.  Before the Reformation, this Rite was prayed by the clergy alone.  In the Common Service tradition, it is a rite of corporate confession that points us back to Holy Baptism.  Starting with the words of St. Matthew, “in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit” (28:19) and ending in the words of St. Mark, “whoever believes and is baptized shall be saved” (16:16), the rite is a stark reminder that Baptism provides both the basis for Christian repentance and the assurance of our forgiveness.  This is all made possible through our baptismal crucifixion, burial, and resurrection with Christ, through which we have received the “full right of sons” (Galatians 4:5) as redeemed children of God.

Introit
After readying our hearts in the light of Holy Baptism, we are prepared to enter into God’s presence.  The Latin Introitus plays off this theme, meaning just that: “entrance.”  The Pastor symbolizes this on behalf of the congregation by approaching the Altar while the Introit is sung.  The Introit is the first of the Proper chants that belong to the congregation, so-called because they are selections from Scripture that vary throughout the Church year with themes that are proper to the given day.  As the first of these chants, the Introit helps to set the tone for the day’s worship.  In fact, the names given to the days of the Church year are taken from the first word or two of their Latin Introit.  The Introit follows a standard form, starting with the singing of an Antiphon (from the Greek word 
ἀντίφωνα, meaning "responsive") followed by the chanting of a Psalm verse and the Gloria Patri (“Glory be to the Father”), and concluding with a reprisal of the Antiphon.  

Gloria Patri
The Gloria Patri is the little hymn or doxology of praise contained in the larger chant of the Introit, expressing glory to the Triune God.   It emphasizes that He is the same yesterday, today, and forever.  This is true not only in time, but “world without end;” that is, in eternity.  It is a hymn truly befitting of the great “I Am” (Exodus 3:14).  The Gloria Patri is only omitted during the season of Passiontide (the last two Sundays in Lent), wherein the Church omits nearly all of its joyous hymns and celebrations in solemn remembrance of the Lord’s suffering and death.  

Kyrie
The Kýrie, Eléison (Greek for “Lord, have mercy”) is an ancient prayer that is repeated throughout the Psalms (Psalm 123:3, Psalm 86:3, etc.).  After entering into God’s presence, we implore Him to bestow His grace upon us.  Historically, the Kýrie, eléison was used as a congregational response similar to “Amen.”  The pastor would pray a series of intercessory petitions, after each of which the congregation would respond Kýrie, eléison.  Over time, the pastoral petitions were phased out and only the congregational responses remained, making it a prayer or canticle belonging to the people.  This prayer has also come to be recognized as a confession of the Trinity, with each of its three petitions (Kýrie, eléison, Christe, eléison, Kýrie, eléison) traditionally repeated three times (3x3).  Another unique aspect of this prayer is the fact that it was one of the only parts of the Latin Mass sung in Greek.  In the ancient days of the Church, everyone spoke Greek; the Kyrie is a vestigial piece of evidence testifying to this fact, providing a strong indication that the language of the Divine Service should be in the language of the people.  Still, there are some words and phrases that have been continuously used since believers spoke Hebrew (such as “Amen,” “Alleluia,” “Sabaoth,” and “Hosanna,” to name a few); these short phrases are easily explained to the simple and unlearned, so retaining words like “Kyrie” in the original Greek is not inappropriate.

Gloria in Excelsis

Following our prayer for God’s gracious mercy in the Kyrie, the Gloria in Excelsis (“Glory be to God on High”) is immediately sung.  The Gloria (sometimes called the “Greater Gloria” to distinguish it from the Gloria Patri) is the great angelic hymn that the Holy Angels sang on the eve of our Lord’s Nativity (St. Luke 2:14).  It also serves as an emphatic answer to our plea for God’s mercy:  “on earth peace; good will toward men.”   The “peace” and “good will toward men” are explained by the hymn, in the words of St. John the Baptist, to be none other than the “Lamb of God...that takest away the sins of the world” (St. John 1:29).  He is the one Who has “mercy upon us” and “receive[s] our prayer.”  And, true to form with the other parts of the Liturgy thus far, the hymn also beautifully confesses the glorious mystery of the Holy Trinity:  “Thou only, O Christ, with the Holy Ghost, art most high in the glory of God the Father.  Amen.”  During the penitential seasons of Advent, Septuagesima, and Lent, the Gloria in Excelsis is omitted as the Church’s worship takes on a more somber tone.

Salutation

With our entrance into God’s presence, our prayer for mercy, and God’s gracious answer having all taken place, the pastor greets the people with the ancient ecclesial greeting or “salutation,”Dominus Vobiscum (“the Lord be with you”), which has its basis in various passages of Scripture (Judges 18:6, Ruth 2:4, 1 Samuel 17:37, 1 Chronicles 22:11, 2 Thessalonians 3:16, etc.).  The people respond with “and with thy spirit,” a response which may have its basis in 2 Timothy 4:22, where St. Paul specifically applies the response to St. Timothy, a pastor.  

Collect of the Day
The pastor then bids the people with the Oremus, “let us pray,” after which the Collect of the Day is spoken or chanted.  The word “collect” comes from the Latin collecta and is a term meaning “prayer,” but is distinct from the more common Latin word for prayer, oratio.  Collecta implies a corporate prayer - a “collective” prayer of the people.  This is an important distinction, because the pastor is not praying on his own behalf, but on behalf of all the gathered saints of God.  Through the pastor, the congregation approaches God with one voice.
The structure of the Collect of the Day follows the same basic pattern throughout the Church year, but the theme changes to corroborate with the Propers and Scripture lessons.    The Collect typically includes 1) an invocation of God, 2) a declaration of one of one of God’s Divine attributes, which is usually related to 3) the request being made, 4) the reason or reasons the request is being made, and 5) a doxology, which, in the Common Service Tradition, usually takes the form of:  “through Jesus Christ, Thy Son, our Lord, Who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, ever one God: world without end.  Amen.”


'via Blog this'

Daniel Baker has left a new comment on your post "Ecclesia Augustana: The Divine Liturgy: Part 1 (In...":

Is the closing graphic in reference to Christian Worship? If so, I could not agree more!

Mary Thompson -- Wrong Turn on the Road to School

WELS excommunicated Mary for asking questions.
Imagine that.

Mary Thompson -- Wrong Turn on the Road to School:


WRONG TURN ON THE ROAD TO SCHOOL

By Mary Thompson
December 5, 2012
NewsWithViews.com

If a “conservative movement” exists, it became lost on the way to school. What can explain its having become the cheering section for the euphemism, “School Choice”, masquerading as a means to escape deliberately dumbed down government t schools? The promotion of charter schools, vouchers, opportunity scholarships, etc. on the part of conservatives is a contradiction in terms coming from folks who distribute copies of the Constitution, participate in and cheer T-Party activities, register Republican or Libertarian.

This writer has contended elsewhere that the post WWII generation assumed institutions would continue as they were known before their lives were interrupted by WWII followed by the Korean War. The assumption was wrong, but they went about their private lives oblivious to forces at work with an agenda to systematically “Unfreeze” existing systems. Post WWII conservatives didn’t question their heroes or political idols and with a few exceptions, failed to look beneath the surface of the rhetoric.

One wrong turn on the “road to school” issues, was embodied by Milton Friedman’s idea of government funded school vouchers as free market enterprise to ostensibly create competition for government funded schools. Why advocates for private free market enterprise would not/could not grasp that no reasonable entity, whether private or government, ever funds its own demise through competition with itself, unless private schools were the target to be usurped by government control and regulation, is a question of the era. The idea of competitive free market enterprise has no conceptual room for funding with government funds which are obtained by virtue of government “power of the sword” to compel. There is simply no way to synthesize the two concepts except to confound the principles of free market and government funding. That is currently in high gear as well with what is called “public-private partnerships”. The dichotomy of charter schools as “competition” in real terms being the darling of the “right” is equally as mystifying.
Not possessing the ability to read minds, one can only wonder at the contradictions. The definition of political principles is becoming blurred as political parties become more meaningless with every election, labels for “Conservative” or “Liberal are also rapidly becoming obfuscated.

The exposure to two things was the catalyst for this article. One was a written document, the other a live panel discussion. The written document, another of the never ending strategy papers spilling from government instigation, prepared by a commission made possible by legislation by Congressman, Mike Honda (D-California). The fifty page document submitted as advice to Arne Duncan, Secretary of Education carries the title: FOR EACH AND EVERY CHILD, A STRATEGY FOR EDUCATION EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE”, prepared by a commission of twenty eight commission member and six ex officio members. It acknowledges the support of the Broad Foundation, The Ford Foundation, Bill and Melina Gates Foundation, William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, W.K. Kellogg Foundation, and others.
The report is a lot of nothing new, but with emphasis on schools to be more concerned with “social and education equity,” technology’s role in that agenda and the necessity for increased Federal role to achieve it. Ideas familiar to education researchers are all there…Common Core Standards, charter schools, early learning (Birth to Post Secondary oversight). Interested parties can access the fifty page report by accessing the U.S. Department of Education web site or typing the title of the report into a search engine.


The second event was attending a panel discussion on “Improving Education” (3/5/2013) sponsored by a large and influential Conservative Forum in Silicon Valley. Four speakers were, Dr. Terry Moe from Stanford Hoover Institute; Gloria Romero, former CA Assemblywoman (D),founder of Parent Revolution and author of California’s Parent Trigger Law; Larry Sand, former teacher and school choice advocate; and Dean Vogel, President of the California Teachers Association. This writer had heard Moe, Romero and Sand appearing together in a previous year during School Choice Week at a different venue. The MC preempted what came to mind when he joked about the names on stage including, “Terry, Larry and Moe”….audience laughter.

Sand’s message was true to form, “the need for choice,” “getting away from education by zip code,” “more vouchers for money to follow the students,” etc. Sand’s memorable comment was, “Even if charter schools are not doing a better job, we need more because they cost less money.” So much for improving education.

Gloria Romero stressed the “urgency for more funding for education.” Her mantra is that schools are the “Civil rights Issue of our time…we can’t nibble around the edges.” “Power To The Parents.” She mentioned having just been in Texas and predicted “we will get it (Parent Trigger Law) in Texas next.” “NCLB was imperfect but needed” according Romero, who closed with urging to join hands with President Obama whom she says she supports.
Next was Dr. Terry Moe. It was the second speaking engagement with the “Conservative Forum.” He lamented about trying to get “things done for 30 years.” “Teacher evolution, charter schools (Applause) are doing things unions don’t like.” “Things are improving but why didn’t we do it 30 years ago. Making incremental progress is good, but not enough.” “I’m here to talk about Revolution! Revolution K-12 as well as higher education and nothing will stop it.” “On-line learning is a beautiful thing. Think what will be possible"…. "Huge for social equity.” “Can computers make up for some family atmospheres? Computers can overcome some disadvantages…kids are treated equally by computers.” “Schools are government agencies and teachers are government employers, so driven by politics, teachers unions are more interested in jobs than children.”

Moe’s prediction for the future is “that substituting technology for labor will still need teachers but not so many of them. The future will be blended learning”. Florida’s virtual schools are a beacon according to Moe. In his previous address to the same organization, he said the future was “Distance Learning”. But the most chilling statement this time was a conclusion that “Technology is cheap, labor is expensive”. That means you, Teachers. Be forewarned, your jobs are on the offshoring block. According to Dr. Moe, “Nothing will stop the Revolution.”

Dean Vogel, Pres. of the CTA addressed what would be expected…stressed thinking in terms of drawing a circle to determine common ground instead of “drawing lines in the sand,” but he did mention that he’s hearing from teachers asking why so much testing.

[Quotations of panelists are from this writer’s notes taken from front row seat at the event] Spontaneous applause of the audience in response to the presentations of the “Three Stooges,” at the mention of charter schools and vouchers was astonishing and clearly 
manifesting wrong turn taken on the road to school.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:


Whether failure to do the investigative homework necessary to discern the created issues, dismissing or “dissing” the work of some who have done the homework which is available to access on line free for the reading, whether following prominent names who have become “idols” in the annuls of so called conservatism without questioning, somewhere along the road the battlegrounds have been misidentified. Regardless of an answer, the result is a phenomenon of self- identified conservatism applauding itself as it climbs into bed with admirers of Obama, Arne Duncan, and the Council on Foreign Relations all of whom have now come out as Pied Pipers for the very agenda a “conservative movement” followed by misreading the detour signs on the road to school. It was ingenious, for now a conservative movement is carrying the water for the left’s agenda which has placed the detour signs to confuse the issues for at least the past 50 years.
© 2012 Mary Thompson - All Rights Reserved

Mary has a degree from Michigan State, her home state. Mary relocated with her husband to California where she became active in Republican Party, then as an early activist opposing innovations in schools which were emanating from Washington resulting from the passage of ESEA. She formed an organization with another mother and political activist to become a research source for information and opposition to the imposition of an all inclusive curricula in the nation's schools, called Family Life Education as well as PPBS, the management by objectives system used to accomplish the acceptance of FLE. During that effort, party activism was abandoned to concentrate on issues before becoming a small business owner with her husband until the 1990's.

In 2001 Mary became an individual plaintiff in association with the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association in a lawsuit against the Santa Clara County Open Space Authority which ultimately resulted in a favorable unanimous decision by the California State Supreme Court in 2008. Following that court decision she was the class representative for negotiations allowing property owners to receive refunds for the illegal OSA assessment.


'via Blog this'