|No marble, no gold - just the Word of God.|
The altar was designed, photographed, and
Photoshopped by Norma Boeckler.
These two quotations from Luther's Sermons reveal the "conservative" synod leaders as buffoons.
I was telling the vice-president of our congregation how the original Lenker edition of Luther's Sermons could be obtained on the used market - "completely unmarked, eight volumes, $80."
He said, "From what you said, aren't they all like that?"
I thought a second and laughed. I am still laughing. The best humor comes from simple observations. I had been saying earlier that no one ever suggested that Lutheran seminarians read Luther's Sermons. An ELDONA exile said his first required reading at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, was The Purpose-Driven Church. Timid Tim said that all his books at Mordor were Reformed: "Greg, all your books are Lutheran! We had to read all those Reformed books at Mequon."
But I digress from the Luther statements. Every debate about doctrine reveals the "conservative" Lutheran leaders as anti-Luther, anti-Scripture, anti-Confessions. That is so easy to determine. They cite their numbskull authorities - uncle, dad, grandpa, cousin, favorite prof, synod resolutions - against the Gospel, against Luther, against the Book of Concord.
Whenever that happens, that individual is saying, "Here I stand - against Luther."
Jon-Boy Buchholz says his precious Objective Justification dogma is "settled doctrine." Who settled it? JP Meyer? David Valleskey? Larry Olson? Paul Kelm? They have a group doctrinal IQ of 20.
Gausewitz did not teach OJ, because his forgotten and out-of-print catechism is simply based on showing the Scriptures behind Luther's Small Catechism. And if not, then who cares anyway? Gausewitz is not the last word on anything.
The LCMS and ELS have dozens of OJ experts to cite. Both sects like to bring up the Brief Statement of 1932, as if it trumped the Bible and the Book of Concord. As if that political statement, which launched the radical liberal era of Missouri, has any standing outside of the Midwest.
The great and wise of LCMS, WELS, ELS, CLC, and the micro-mini sects show their true color (yellow) in directing people to Fuller Seminary, not to the Word of God. See Luther's statements.
Whom do they admire and emulate? ELCA! They subordinate their supposed principles to ELCA too, in working with the various genders and identities of that decomposing and rationalistic sect of Pietism. ELCA is what the rest are rapidly becoming. Not that WELS, for instance, is unwilling. They want to ordain women, but as John Brug says, "WELS is not ready for that yet."
Fuller will make them ready. Willow Creek will steel their knobbly knees, which quake at the sound of Schwan money declining. Rick Warren will play the fool and make them laugh at the next conference they attend, spending your offering money on slow horses, expensive booze, and fast women. Some other heroes have evaporated faster than the Little Mermaid at the end of her original H. C. Anderson tale. Mark Driscoll - gone - sob. Robert Schuller - gone - shudder. But the "conservative" Lutherans have raised up their own Colossus - Mark and Avoid Jeske. He can lead them into ELCA paradise.