Saturday, October 18, 2008

New York Episcopals: Money To Sue You into Foreclosure, Not Enough for Staff



This would be a good time to get a drive-by DMin from Fuller.
Better, yet - one from Our Lady of Sorrows Seminary, St. Louis.


DIOCESE OF CENTRAL NEW YORK: Dwindling Finances Force Staff Layoffs

By David W. Virtue

www.virtueonline.org

10/17/2008

Citing declining income, the Bishop of the Diocese of Central New York, Gladstone "Skip" Adams has announced staff layoffs in a letter to his clergy, wardens and standing.

"It is clear that the financial realities of today's economy are creating challenges for our congregations in terms of assessment and investment revenue. Increased energy costs place additional pressures on already stretched budgets. These challenges obviously impact the financial resources available on the Diocesan level for staff, programming, and ministry," he wrote.

The diocese recently filed a lawsuit against the Church of the Good Shepherd in Binghamton, New York, in an effort to seize the church building, the parish hall, and the rectory. This is the third church Adams has moved to seize since 2006, and the second church he has actually sued.

One other church, St. Andrew's Church in nearby Vestal, New York, surrendered its property to the bishop rather than face a lawsuit. That church building was taken over by the Episcopal diocese shortly before Christmas of 2007 and is now vacant and for sale. The congregation is worshiping elsewhere and thriving.

For the bishop's full statement click here:

http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/content/dcny_staff_reorganization_memo.pdf

***

GJ - The Episcopalians have lost 1/3 of their members since 1978. The foolish vindictiveness of filing suit against a congregation is apparent. The well-heeled members can find their own property. The confiscated property has little value, especially in today's market.

The Episcopalian bishops refused to stop illegal ordinations of women, supposedly to draw the line at women becoming bishops. Women's ordination was normalized. Next a thoroughly unqualified woman became a suffragan (assistant) bishop. They called her Bishop Babs. Still no action. Next women became bishops. The same rationale for ordaining women priests allowed for electing women bishops. Soon after, a woman bishop with very little pastoral or administrative experience, Katharine Jefferts-Schori, was elected Presiding Bishop. The lawsuits have multiplied since that time, not only at the national level, but also at the diocese (district) level.

Meanwhile, the new PB is seeing a vast exodus of Episcopalians from her organization. They are leaving by congregation, even by diocese. Her answer is to step up the lawsuits and deny there is any crisis.

Mutatis mutandis, the conservative Lutherans have pursued the same foolish course. Most pastors limited their criticism of blatant apostasy to a few quiet quips during the coffee break, assuming the position after the break was over. Now after 30 years of damage, they are willing to say a few mild things as a group. How brave of them. Maybe Church Growth is wrong after all. Sniffle, whimper (WELS). Save the radio station. Boo hoo (LCMS). After years of intense pressure and unlimited flattery from Paul McCain, DP Benke is willing to say Allah is not the true God. Who says diplomacy, greased with a book contract from CPH, does not work? Barry-McCain could have disciplined Benke instead of rewarding him with benign neglect. See footnote below.

The main difference is that the Episcopalian bishops are willing to face down the national leader and take their flocks out of her toxic shadow. These bishops have the option of joining with conservative Anglican confessions. They ask foreign bishops to come over and provide the leadership so lacking in America. Priests are taking their congregations out, often absent the property, and doing well, free of the baggage and issues of the apostate group.

FOOTNOTE: Howard Festerling (WELS) was making a brave stand for the efficacy of the Word. Bruce Becker, who recently called Kelm back to The Love Shack, got rid of Festerling. No one backed Festerling up. One WELS pastor answered, "Look what happened to you." Festerling had his mission taken away from him. He lived in the Toledo area later, but the ELS congregation he attended did not commune him. The ELS has no problem with Fuller doctrine, but affirming the efficacy of God's Word? That must be punished by excommunication.

The same dynamics were at work in Missouri. McCain-Barry did nothing about Benke, but Wally Schulz did, a few years later. McCain has a sinecure at CPH, promoting books. Schulz was fired from The Lutheran Hour. Missouri replaced Schulz with Ken Klaus (no relation to Santa), a man with a fake doctorate from the basement of a Methodist church.

UOJ Stormtroopers Without Armor




LutherQuest (sic) prides itself on defending Universal Objective Justification - justification without faith, without the Means of Grace, without the Word. Now the denizens of that skunk patch are bickering among themselves about how the whole world is absolved (UOJ), which words work, and other confusions.

The UOJ line of reasoning comes from 1850 and later - for a good reason. All the major Lutheran groups in America came from the Pietistic era of the 19th century, except for the Muhlenberg tradition (General Synod, General Council, the ULCA, finally the LCA of 1962). The Muhlenberg tradition began in the earlier era of Pietism. His Ministerium of Pennsylvania began in 1748, while the Midwestern Lutherans came over about 100 years later.

The Augustana Synod was just merged into the LCA when I was confirmed. The Augustana Synod began in 1860. One of my jobs at the Augustana College Library was putting away bound copies of The Pietist, the journal which motivated Swedish Pietists to find freedom from persecution in America. Once here they became influenced by the Confessions and Confessional Lutherans like the Passavant.

The language being tossed around on LutherQuest (sic) is from Pietism. That is why they dare not delve into the Book of Concord, Luther, Chemnitz, Gerhard, or the later orthodox Lutherans. Their distortions of Scripture come from their Pietistic assumptions.

I am working on this for a new book on justification. Sadly, Robert Preus repudiated UOJ in his last book but did not spell it out clearly enough for its addled followers. That is partly his fault. He was beating the drums for UOJ in the 1980s, repeating the Norwegian Pietistic arguments.

I know Augustana specifically argued against the Norwegians, even though both immigrant groups were equally influenced by Pietism. But Pietism had its varieties of expression. Norwegians and Swedes were used to opposing each other, too.

The Swedish Lutherans and Norwegian Lutherans modified their Pietism in America, grafting orthodoxy onto its earlier tradition, with limited success. Eventually the Pietistic side won out in both groups and threw aside orthodoxy. Pietism quickly morphs into Unitarianism, as we can see in the ELCA.

In a few words, UOJ is from the Pietism of the 19th century. The language and the doctrine can be traced to non-Lutheran sources. Walther was converted by a Pietist and never escaped Pietism, as he admitted. Walther is the chief source for UOJ, but his peculiar false doctrine took over the Missouri Synod and the old Synodical Conference rather fitfully. The false doctrine was not declared with Vatican-like certainty until the 1930 Brief Statement.

The Brief Statement is not in the Book of Concord.

As Mudslide used to say at Mequon, every anniversary of the Reformation is marred by some official anti-Lutheran act. Look at the date of the Brief Statement - 400 years after justification by faith was beautifully expressed by the Augsburg Confession, the clear phrases of Melanchthon were replaced by the Enthusiasm of Pietism.

The assault was repeated in 1987 with Theses on Justification, LCMS, blending justification by faith with UOJ. Supposedly Robert Preus had a hang in the 1987 assault. Preus had many fine qualities, but he was not an editor of the Book of Concord.

Cheep Home Entertainment System



Several shallow bowls with fresh water are ideal for birds.


Birds are endlessly entertaining. I asked for and received a solar powered bird bath for a present last year. In Minnesota I had a birdbath warmer, which kept the water from freezing all winter. I still have it.

This birdbath is not practical for most birds. The structure makes it difficult for larger birds. Only the smaller ones can take a sip from the main bowl. The advantage comes from the dribbling sound created when sun falls on the solar collector, running a water pump. Grooves on an upper plate allow the water to splash into the lower bowl.

Splashing water sounds will attract birds from far away. They appreciate food and need shelter, but they crave water to clean the grit off their wings. Feathers are "a miracle," as one evolutionist said in a moment of candor. Feathers require constant preening, so birds need to clean and preen constantly. In Phoenix they have plenty of splashing water spigots, lawn sprinklers, and fountains, but I like having birds in clear view of the kitchen bay-windows.

Two shallow bowls rest on a low table, enabling the birds to bathe safely. Their main competition is with each other. Sometimes a large bird will hog the baths and scare away his relatives. Smaller birds climb in together, splashing each other. The normal routine is to dip the head, drive the water toward the back, and shake it into the wings. Several dips create a complete wetting down. Group splashing speeds this up. Then more shaking leaves each bird looking completely disheveled. Afterwards they find a safe place in the trees and bushes to preen.

I hang a bag of thistle seed on the palo brea tree which shades the birdbaths. Thistle is the nickname for niger, an African seed loved by finches and other small birds. Doves eat fallen thistle from the ground. Finches eat it from the sock-bag I hang in the tree. A bag is expensive per ounce but lasts about 10 days. Sunflower seed attracts common pigeons, so I do not offer that anymore. I like the large pigeons, but the neighbors do not appreciate their messes and loutish behavior.

The best source of food for birds comes from planting. Trees are loaded with insects, pollinate, and set seed. Hummingbirds enjoy all flowers, both the nectar and the insects attracted. They know bird-lovers and show up for a gentle spray of water from the hose, hovering only a few feet away.

The plants are also shelter. Each level provides a home for different species. Our yard is noisy with bird choirs.

WELS Humor and Spelling: Glendale Conference Borrows Plot from The Sixth Sense



Resolving parish conflict? Ex-DP Janke created parish conflict and was asked to leave.


Ex-First Veep of WELS Wayne Mueller: "There is no Church Growth Movement in WELS, but if there is, it is A-OK." Translation: Mark and avoid (Romans 16) means register and attend at Fooler Seminary, or Willow Crick.


District Website

Arizona - California Pastors Conference


Dear Brothers in Christ,

The 2008 Arizona-California Pastors Conference is scheduled for Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, October 21th - 23rd, 2008, at Grace Evangelical Lutheran Church , Glendale , Arizona ..

1:00 Afternoon Devotion: San Diego Circuit Pastor
Psalm 133:1, "How good and pleasent (sic) it is when brothers live
together in unity!" is the general theme for the devotions.
1:15 ESSAY: Practical / Pastoral: Resolving Conflict in the Parish,
Rev. Paul Janke

***

GJ - Missing from the conference agenda - Paul Kelm's Ministry of Copy and Paste--or--How I Turned My DMin from St. Louis and My Copying Skills into a New Job at The Love Shack.

For those like me who missed The Sixth Sense on purpose, here are famous quotes.

Liberal Michigan Episcopalians To Spend $350,000 To Study Why They Are Shrinking




Diocese of Michigan in Steep Decline. Sunday Attendance Down by 22%.

Plate Revenues Down $2 Million


By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
10/16/2008

The Episcopal Diocese of Michigan is in free fall.

The liberal diocese is faced with declining church attendance, and dwindling income. The diocese is going to launch a plan aimed at revitalizing the "diocesan household."

A report at their website said the diocese must face stark realities. A task force says that "the Episcopal Diocese of Michigan is in steep decline." Charts included in the document reveal that average Sunday attendance has declined by 22% since 2000. During the same time period, "pledge and plate revenues" for all congregations combined has decreased by approximately $2 million, when adjusted for inflation.

"We are experiencing decline in members, attendance and revenues," the proposal says. "We are drawing down our assets and depleting some of our assets. The only faith-filled response is to make bold decisions to invest in places and congregations where signs of vitality are strong. It will require courage, prayer and faith. It will require a more deliberate commitment than we, as a household, have ever dared to make. And most of all, it will require God's blessing and divine guidance as we seek to do his will," says Bishop Wendell Gibbs.

Delegates to Michigan's 174th annual convention, meeting October 24-25 in Dearborn, will entertain a proposal from the Diocesan Council and the Extended Ministries Fund Task Force II that calls for spending up to $325,000 from the principal of Ruth Harvey who endowed nearly $9 million to the diocese. She was a life-long member of Christ Church, Detroit.

The EMF fund will be used to do a top to bottom study of the diocese. The project is designed to promote ministry and growth. A series of open forums leading up to convention got underway on October 8.

***

GJ - Some nice old lady left $9 million to the Episcopalians in Michigan. The apostates have done everything possible to drive away their members. Now they are going to shave that endowment to find out how they can rev things up again. They will try everything to get things going again - everything except the Word of God.

WELS spent far more money proportionately with all the Schwan funds and restricted funds - did not work. Synod officials Wayne Mueller and SP Gurgel decided not to be legalistic about the term restricted funds.

All the mainline groups have spent an ocean of money on methods, study at Fuller and Willow Creek, statistical analysis, computer networks. Not one is interested in being faithful to their own confessions, whatever they are.

ELCA had some fine theologians in the past. They could have a national study based on Lenski or Krauth, but they will not. The leaders have more in common with Bill Ayres and his lovely bomb-shell wife, Bernadette Dorn.

Missouri likes to use the name Concordia all the time. They should study the Formula of Concord. Some of the clergy would end up saying, "This sheds a lot of light of what we have been doing...or not doing." The LCMS leaders covet ELCA and the pastors covet Rome. They have a non-geographical Pentecostal wing (pun intended) that has more in common with the Assemblies of God than Martin Luther and Chemny or whatever-his-name-is.

The Wisconsin Synod has had such bad leadership that some have finally awakened before the hour of their doom. However, most clergy are almost numb to Luther and the Book of Concord. Besides, they cannot admit having false teachers. After finally ridding themselves of Wayne Mueller, who just about wrecked WELS, they invite him to be the main speaker in Glendale, Arizona. I was going to sit at his feet and drink in the wisdom of Fuller, Willow Creek, and ELCA, but I discovered something good on daytime TV for those days.

11:00 ELDER TRAINING WORKSHOP - Led by Rev. Wayne Mueller
12:00 Lunch: Prayer led by conference Vice-Chairman, Pastor Tim Westendorf.
1:00 Afternoon Devotion: San Diego Circuit pastor
1:15 ELDER TRAINING WORKSHOP - Led by Rev. Wayne Mueller
2:45 Afternoon Break
3:00 ELDER TRAINING WORKSHOP - Led by Rev. Wayne Mueller

The Little Sect on the Prairie has re-established the papacy.

The nano-sects cannot outrun the actuaries and morticians, who will put them out of business soon, but not soon enough.

Two Accidents at Arizona State Fair



Tom Owen, Human Speed Bump


Performer at State Fair injured during stunt

by Alyson Zepeda - Oct. 17, 2008 09:40 PM

The Arizona Republic

A man performing the act the "Human Speed Bump" was injured after being run over by a car during his act at the Arizona State Fair around 6:20 p.m. according to the Arizona Department of Public Safety.

Tom Owen was scheduled to be run over by eight cars weighing up to 30,000 pounds according to the Arizona State Fair attractions listings.

Owen holds the Guinness World Record for being run over by seven cars and was attempting to break that record Friday.

As the last vehicle, a box truck, passed over him the stunt equipment failed injuring his lower body and extremities said DPS.

Owen was taken to a nearby hospital with non life-threatening injuries.

Despite the equipment failure DPS officials say that the man did set a new world record.

Owen, who is known for feats such as picking up six people and pulling box cars with his teeth, has had over 1,000 vehicles run over him throughout his career according to his Web site.

Owen has previously used his stunts to raise money for youth homes.

***

GJ - Another accident occurred in the magician's tent, during the Woman Sawed in Half demonstration. The victim is at Banner Thunderbird Hospital, Rooms 401 and 402.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Hilarious Contest on LutherQuest (sic):
Which Person Knows the Least about Justification by Faith?



I can't tell who the biggest heretic is!


The debate can be found here.

Please read the discussion for comic relief only. Any attempt to unravel the debate will cause seizures, stomach pain, wheezing, sputtering, headaches, nausea, and dizziness.

The dialogue reveals the danger of embracing Enthusiasm and ignoring the efficacy of the Word in the Means of Grace.

Norm Teigen Takes a Vacation While Global Financial Crisis Continues




Norman Teigen has shown surprising detachment from the blogosphere, leaving for vacation in the midst of a global financial crisis.

Teigen volunteers for so many activities that he is one of the few retirees who has to take a vacation from retirement.

Future ELCA Pastors Win Full Scholarships




Archives of ELCA News

Students who received full-tuition scholarships for the 2008- 2009 academic year, each studying for a master of divinity degree, are:

+ Kevin Baker, Freeport, Texas, Lutheran School of Theology at
Chicago
+ Megan Eide, Sioux Falls, S.D., Lutheran School of Theology at
Chicago
+ Megan Fryling, Holland, Mich., Lutheran Theological Seminary at
Philadelphia
+ Caitlin Glass, Fairfax Station, Va., Lutheran Theological
Seminary at Gettysburg (Pa.)
+ Bradley Haugen, St. Paul, Minn., Luther Seminary, St. Paul
+ Holly Johnson, Moorhead, Minn., Pacific Lutheran Theological
Seminary, Berkeley, Calif.
+ Ann Kelly, Boone, N.C., Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary,
Columbia, S.C.
+ Jo Kinnard, Elgin, Ill., Wartburg Theological Seminary,
Dubuque, Iowa
+ Anders Peterson, Minneapolis, Pacific Lutheran Theological
Seminary
+ Cynthia Ritter, Oregon, Ohio, Trinity Lutheran Seminary,
Columbus, Ohio
+ Deanna Scheffel, Warrenton, Va., Lutheran Theological Southern
Seminary
+ Paul Schick, Fullerton, Calif., Wartburg Theological Seminary
+ Rodney Smith, Hampstead, N.H., Lutheran Theological Seminary at
Philadelphia
+ Sarah Timian, Langdon, N.D., Lutheran Theological Seminary at
Gettysburg
+ Rachel Voxland, Moorhead, Minn., Luther Seminary
+ Brett Wilson, Midlothian, Va., Lutheran Theological Seminary at
Philadelphia
+ Jared Witt, Littleton, Colo., Trinity Lutheran Seminary

Obama Parish Consultant - Also Knows How To Steal Words From Another



If the presidency does not work out, he could apply at The Love Shack. I will donate a black rob for him to wear. (That is how they spell robe in Green Bay. Confidential to Kelm: plagiarize Luther and use a dictionary.)


October 17, 2008

Evidence Mounts: Ayers Co-Wrote Obama's Dreams

By Jack Cashill

Evidence continues to mount that Barack Obama had substantial help from Bill Ayers in the creation of his 1995 book, Dreams From My Father, a book that Time Magazine has called "the best-written memoir ever produced by an American politician." The evidence falls into five general categories, here summarized.


The discovery of new matching nautical metaphors from both Ayers and Obama that almost assuredly came from the same source: Ayers, a former merchant seaman.
The discovery of a Bill Ayers' essay on memoir writing, whose postmodern themes and phrases are echoed throughout Dreams.
A newly discovered book chapter from 1990 that shows clearly and painfully the limits of Obama's prose style the year he received a contract to write Dreams.
The revelation by radical Islamicist Rashid Khalidi that Ayers made his "dining room table" available for neighborhood writers who needed help.
A refined timeline that shows Ayers had the means, the motive and the time to help Obama when he needed it most.


The timeline


A 1990 New York Times profile on Obama's election as the Harvard Law Review's first black president in 1990 caught the eye of agent Jane Dystel. She persuaded Poseidon, a small imprint of Simon & Schuster, to authorize a roughly $125,000 advance for Obama's proposed memoir.


Obama repaired to Chicago with advance in hand and dithered. At one point, in order to finish the book without interruption, he and wife Michelle decamped to Bali. Obama was supposed to have finished the book within a year. Bali or not, advance or no, he could not. Simon & Schuster canceled the contract. His agent hustled him a new, smaller contract.


Ayers published his book To Teach in 1993. Between 1993 and 1996, he had no other formal authorial assignment than to co-edit a collection of essays. This was an unusual hole in his very busy publishing career.


Obama's memoir was published in June 1995. Earlier that year, Ayers helped Obama, then a junior lawyer at a minor law firm, get appointed chairman of the multi-million dollar Chicago Annenberg Challenge grant. In the fall of that same year, 1995, Ayers and his wife, Weatherwoman Bernardine Dohrn, helped blaze Obama's path to political power with a fundraiser in their Chicago home.


In short, Ayers had the means, the motive, the time, the place and the literary ability to jumpstart Obama's career. And, as Ayers had to know, a lovely memoir under Obama's belt made for a much better resume than an unfulfilled contract over his head.


Neighborhood assistance


Allow me to reconstruct how Obama transformed himself into what the New York Times has called "that rare politician who can write . . . and write movingly and genuinely about himself." There is an element of speculation in this, but new evidence continues to narrow the gap between the speculative and the conclusive. One clue comes from an unexpected source, Rashid Khalidi, the radical Arab-American friend of Obama's and reputed ally of the PLO.


In the acknowledgment section of his 2004 book, Resurrecting Empire, Khalidi writes of Ayers, "Bill was particularly generous in letting me use his family's dining room table to do some writing for the project." Khalidi did not need the table. He had one of his own. He needed the help.


Khalidi had spent several years at Chicago University's Center for International Studies. At a 2003 farewell dinner on the occasion of his departure from Chicago, Obama toasted him, thanking him and his wife for the many dinners that they had shared as well as for his "consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases."


Chicago's Hyde Park was home to a tight, influential radical community at whose center were Ayers and Dohrn. In this world, the Ayers' terrorist rap sheet only heightened their reputation. Obama had to know. The couple had given up revolution in 1980 for the long slow march through the institutions. By 1994, if not earlier, Ayers saw a way to quicken that march.


I believe that after failing to finish his book on time, and after forfeiting his advance from Simon & Schuster, Obama brought a sprawling, messy, sophomoric manuscript to the famed dining room table of Bill Ayers and said, "Help."


Obama's limited skills


Obama needed all the help he could get. Prior to 1990, he had written very close to nothing. In 1981 Occidental College published two of Obama's poems-"Pop" and "Underground. Obama calls it some "very bad poetry," and he does not sell himself short. From "Underground":


Under water grottos, caverns


Filled with apes


That eat figs.


Stepping on the figs


That the apes


Eat, they crunch.


The apes howl, bare


Their fangs, dance . . .



It would be another decade before Obama had anything in print, and this only an edited, unsigned student case comment in the Harvard Law Review unearthed by Politico. Attorneys who reviewed the piece for Politico described it as "a fairly standard example of the genre."


Once elected president of the Harvard Law Review -- more of a popularity than a literary contest -- Obama contributed not one signed word to the HLR or any other law journal.


In 1990 Obama also contributed an essay to a book published by the University of Illinois at Springfield, an anthology called After Alinsky: Community Organizing in Illinois.


Although the essay covers many of the issues raised in Dreams and uses some of the memoir's techniques, it does so without a hint of style, sophistication, or promise. The following two excerpts capture Obama's range or lack thereof:


"Moreover, such approaches can and have become thinly veiled excuses for cutting back on social programs, which are anathema to a conservative agenda."


"But organizing the black community faces enormous problems as well . . . and the urban landscape is littered with the skeletons of previous efforts."


These cliché-choked sentences go beyond the merely unpromising to the fully ungrammatical. "Organizing" does not "face." "Efforts" do not leave "skeletons." "Agendas" do not have "anathemas." Indeed, the essay is clunky, pedestrian, and wonkish, a B- paper in a freshman comp class.


In "Why Organize" Obama makes use of the fully re-created conversation, a technique used to somewhat better effect in Dreams. Here, his ungainly conjuring of black speech makes one cringe:


"I just cannot understand why a bright young man like you would go to college, get that degree and become a community organizer."


"Why's that?"


" 'Cause the pay is low, the hours is long, and don't nobody appreciate you."


To read "Why Organize" in its entirety is to understand the profound limits of Obama's literary talent. I am sure he sensed those limits if no one else did.


Postmodern themes


Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir Fugitive Days and Obama's Dreams From My Father follow oddly similar rules. Ayers describes his as "a memory book," one that deliberately blurs facts and changes identities and makes no claims at history. Obama says much the same. In Dreams, some characters are composites. Some appear out of precise chronology. Names have been changed.


Dreams and Fugitive Days are both suffused with repeated reference to lies, lying and what Ayers calls "our constructed reality." A serious student of literature, Ayers has written thoughtfully on the role of the first person narrator in the construction of a memoir.


In true postmodernist fashion, he rejects the possibility of an objective, universal truth. He argues instead that our lives are journeys, whose "narratives" we "construct" and, if we have the will and the power, impose on others.


Curiously, Obama says much the same in Dreams and in much the same language. "But another part of me knew that what I was telling them was a lie," writes Obama, "something I'd constructed from the scraps of information I'd picked up from my mother."


The evidence strongly suggests that Ayers transformed the stumbling literalist of "Why Organize" into the sophisticated postmodernist of Dreams, and he did not so not by tutoring Obama, but by rewriting his text. The Ayers' quotes that follow come from an essay of his, "Narrative Push/Narrative Pull." The Obama quotes come from Dreams:


Ayers:


"The hallmark of writing in the first person is intimacy. . . . But in narrative the universal is revealed through the specific, the general through the particular, the essence through the unique, and necessity is revealed through contingency."


Obama:


"And so what was a more interior, intimate effort on my part, to understand this struggle and to find my place in it, has converged with a broader public debate, a debate in which I am professionally engaged . . . "


Ayers:


"Narrative begins with something to say-content precedes form."


Obama:


"I understood that I had spent much of my life trying to rewrite these stories, plugging up holes in the narrative . . . "


Ayers:


"Narrative inquiry can be a useful corrective to all this."


Obama:


"Truth is usually the best corrective."


Ayers:


"The mind works in contradiction, and honesty requires the writer to reveal disputes with herself on the page."


Obama:


"Not because that past is particularly painful or perverse but because it speaks to those aspects of myself that resist conscious choice and that--on the surface, at least--contradict the world I now occupy."


Ayers:


The reader must actually see the struggle. It's a journey, not by a tourist, but by a pilgrim.


Obama:


"But all in all it was an intellectual journey that I imagined for myself, complete with maps and restpoints and a strict itinerary."


Ayers:


"Narrative writers strive for a personal signature, but must be aware that the struggle for honesty is constant."


Obama:


"I was engaged in a fitful interior struggle. I was trying to raise myself to be a black man in America."


Ayers:


"But that intimacy can trap a writer into a defensive crouch, into airing grievances or self-justification."


Obama:


"At best, these things were a refuge; at worst, a trap."


Although I cite one example for each, Dreams offers many more. There are ten "trap" references alone and nearly as many for "narrative," "struggle," and "journey." To be sure, there are other postmodernists in Chicago, but few who write as stylishly and as intelligibly as Ayers and fewer who make their dining room tables available to would-be authors of a leftist bent.


The sea metaphors


A newly discovered anecdote from Bill Ayers' 1993 book, To Teach, solidifies the case that he is indeed the muse behind Barack Obama's Dreams From My Father.


In the book, Ayers tells the story of an adventurous teacher who would take her students out to the streets of New York to learn interesting life lessons about the culture and history of the city. As Ayers tells it, the students were fascinated by the Hudson River nearby and asked to see it. When they got to the river's edge, one student said, " Look, the river is flowing up." A second student said, "No, it has to flow south-down."


Not knowing which was right, the teacher and the students did their research. What they discovered, writes Ayers, was "that the Hudson River is a tidal river, that it flows both north and south, and they had visited the exact spot where the tide stops its northward push."


In his 1995 book, Dreams From My Father, Barack Obama shares a stunningly comparable anecdote about tidal rivers from his own brief New York sojourn. He tells of meeting with "Marty Kauffman" at a Lexington Avenue diner, the man from Chicago who was trying to recruit him as a community organizer.


After the meeting, Obama "took the long way home, along the East River promenade." As "a long brown barge rolled through the gray waters toward the sea," Obama sat down on a bench to consider his options. While sitting, he noticed a black woman and her young son against the railing. Overly fond of the too well remembered detail, Obama observes that "they stood side by side, his arm wrapped around her leg, a single silhouette against the twilight."


The boy appeared to ask his mother a question that she could not answer and then approached Obama: "Excuse me, mister," he shouted. "You know why sometimes the river runs that way and then sometimes it goes this way?"


"The woman smiled and shook her head, and I said it probably had to do with the tides." Obama uses the seeming indecisiveness of this tidal river as a metaphor for his own. Immediately afterwards, he shakes the indecision and heads for Chicago.


Even were there no other clues, Obama's frequent and sophisticated use of nautical metaphors like this one makes a powerful case for Ayers' involvement in the writing of Dreams. Despite growing up in Hawaii, Obama gives no indication than he has had any real experience with the sea or ships. Ayers, however, knew a great deal about the sea. After dropping out of college, he took up the life of a merchant seaman.


Although Ayers has tried to put his anxious ocean-going days behind him, the language of the sea will not let him go. "I realized that no one else could ever know this singular experience," Ayers writes of his maritime adventures. Yet curiously, much of this same nautical language flows through Obama's earth-bound memoir.


"Memory sails out upon a murky sea," Ayers writes at one point. Indeed, both he and Obama are obsessed with memory and its instability. The latter writes of its breaks, its blurs, its edges, its lapses. Obama also has a fondness for the word "murky" and its aquatic usages.


"The unlucky ones drift into the murky tide of hustles and odd jobs," he writes, one of four times "murky" appears in Dreams. Ayers and Obama also speak often of waves and wind, Obama at least a dozen times on wind alone. "The wind wipes away my drowsiness, and I feel suddenly exposed," he writes in a typical passage. Both also make conspicuous use of the word "flutter."


Not surprisingly, Ayers uses "ship" as a metaphor with some frequency. Early in the book he tells us that his mother is "the captain of her own ship," not a substantial one either but "a ragged thing with fatal leaks" launched into a "sea of carelessness." Obama too finds himself "feeling like the first mate on a sinking ship." He also makes a metaphorical reference to "a tranquil sea."


More intriguing is Obama's use of the word "ragged" as an adjective as in the highly poetic "ragged air" or "ragged laughter." Both books use "storms" and "horizons" both as metaphor and as reality. Ayers writes poetically of an "unbounded horizon," and Obama writes of "boundless prairie storms" and poetic horizons-"violet horizon," "eastern horizon," "western horizon."


Ayers often speaks of "currents" and "pockets of calm" as does Obama, who uses both as nouns as in "a menacing calm" or "against the current" or "into the current." The metaphorical use of the word "tangled" might also derive from one's nautical adventures. Ayers writes of his "tangled love affairs" and Obama of his "tangled arguments."


In Dreams, we read of the "whole panorama of life out there" and in Fugitive Days, "the whole weird panorama." Ayers writes of still another panorama, this one "an immense panorama of waste and cruelty." Obama employs the word "cruel" and its derivatives no fewer than fourteen times in Dreams.


On at least twelve occasions, Obama speaks of "despair," as in the "ocean of despair." Ayers speaks of a "deepening despair," a constant theme for him as well. Obama's "knotted, howling assertion of self" sounds like something from the pages of Jack London's The Sea Wolf.


My own semi-memoir, Sucker Punch, offers a useful control here too. The book makes no reference at all, metaphorical or otherwise, to ships, seas, oceans, calms, storms, wind, waves, horizons, panoramas, or to things howling, fluttering, knotted, ragged, tangled, or murky. None. And yet I have spent a good chunk of every summer of my life at the ocean.


If there is any one paragraph in Dreams that has convinced me of Ayers' involvement it is this one, in which Obama describes the black nationalist message:


"A steady attack on the white race . . . served as the ballast that could prevent the ideas of personal and communal responsibility from tipping into an ocean of despair."


As a writer, especially in the pre-Google era of Dreams, I would never have used a metaphor as specific as "ballast" unless I knew exactly what I was talking about. Seaman Ayers most surely did.


Why this matters


Obama's handlers have "constructed" his persona around his presumably superior intelligence. Bill Buckley's son Christopher, smitten by Obama's literary skills, is among those who have yielded to this imagery and joined the Obama crusade. Even if someone benign had ghostwritten the book it would present a problem for Obama.


The question is often asked why Obama associated with Ayers. The more appropriate question is why the powerful Ayers would associate with the then obscure Obama. Before Obama's ascendancy, it was Ayers who had the connections, the clout, and the street cred. Ayers could also write and write very well. By the mid-1990s he had had several of his books published. What Ayers could never do, however, was run for office on his own.


My suspicion is that Ayers saw the potential in Obama, and chose to mold it. The calculation in Dreams is palpable. Nothing about the book would deny a black Democrat the White House. If it were revealed that the ghostwriter is Ayers, it would suggest that Ayers has played a major role all along in the shaping of Barack Obama. It is unlikely that the McCain camp would have invested so much energy in establishing the Ayers-Obama link if they did not think this was the case.


At the end of the day, the observer is left with only two conclusions: either Barack Obama experienced a quantum surge in his writing skills almost overnight; or someone made a major contribution to the rewriting of his book.


The dispassionate observer has to choose the latter -- the former has no precedent. If he can endure the consequences, he concedes that that contributor had to be Bill Ayers.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

A Saying Translated for the Synod Officials




There is an old saying in business: a supervisor with an arm around an employee is like a thief with a hand in the till.

Translation into ecclesiastical language:

A pastor with an arm around a member is like a thief with a hand in the offering plate.

The Schwan Song of Stolzenburg's Buddy, Roger Kovaciny



Floyd Luther Stolzenburg, Church Growth Expert for WELS, Supporter of ELS Thoughts of Faith, Kovaciny, Shep, Webber, et al. Did Floyd pledge to commune Masonic members? Is Floyd the husband of one wife? Is Floyd a Lutheran? Dollars determine doctrinal purity.


Roger Kovaciny has left a new comment on your post "Kovaciny Denies Story - Holy Cow!":

Maybe I was there and maybe you were there and maybe somebody said that; I don't doubt it. But it wasn't me. I not only don't talk like that, I have never been among those who took exception to WELS fundraising methods. I'm just trying in a peacful (sic) way to tell you that you've telescoped somebody else's comment onto me, the way so many well-known people get the credit for nonentities' bon mots. (It wasn't Marie Antoinette who said "Let them eat cake," it was Madame Pompadour, the king's mistress.) I've said and done worse than that--but I never said what you quote me as saying.

[GJ - My, my, so much heat over such a small matter. Hearts are peaceful once again, now that people know the Kovaciny version of "Let them eat cake." Kovo is no longer on the ELS ministerium list, since he resigned from it. His grasp of the truth is legendary.]

Not everybody who googles their surname to find out if they've been misquoted reads your blogg (sic), Jackson. Don't flatter yourself.

[GJ - I have multiple, sometimes daily posts from people who say they never read this blog. I am beginning to think it is required reading at The Sausage Factory and The Little Schoolhouse on the Prairie.]

This is not important and I'm not even drawing the obvious conclusion that "You can't trust Gregg Jackson when he puts words inside quote marks." (A little praeteritio there, for those of you in Rio Linda.) There are a lot worse things you could say about me than this, which to most people wouldn't even seem derogatory. But I am about as likely to have said this as I am to have contrasted Matisse with Monet. Theoretically possible, but not plausible, and it didn't happen.

[GJ - Words escape me, for once.]

If you want to leave the post up, fine. It gives me another reason not to read your blogg, because now I'm sure from my own personal knowledge that it's untruthful. Your word against mine--but I already have one other "witness" just on this thread, although he's anonymous, that you've got problems with the truth. I could cite others who have spoken to me privately if they weren't afraid of the storm of vituperation you direct at anyone who comes within your artillery range.

[GJ - Let us unravel this skein of fantasmagoria--"A fantastic sequence of haphazardly associative imagery, as seen in dreams or fever". I have permission from Kovo to post as I see fit, but I do not recall needing his permission. One of his witnesses is someone he admits not knowing: birds of a feather do flock together. He also has unnamed sources who agree with him and live in mortal fear of giving up their names. That may be true, considering how many ELS/WELS clergy support clergy adultery and Church Growth. However, my posts have my name on them, while the attacks are all anonymous.

I could ignore Kovo, but I like to show the laity how the apostate WELS/ELS clergy work. They huddle together and agree on their tactics. They are too skeered to face up to anyone, and they have no qualms about meddling in another pastor's congregation. Kovo served two calls in WELS, then went to the Ukraine to work with Jay Webber and John Shep (now ELCA).

I have a number of parish newsletters published by Stolzenburg, who is still serving the Masonic church position arranged by VP Paul Kuske and others in WELS. Shep and Kovo managed to get a matching grant from the Schwan Foundation to build a church in Russia. Kovo served as the bagman at Floyd's congregation, teaching there as an ELS pastor. The Little Sect on the Prairie has a strict policy on altar and pulpit fellowship - wave a $100 bill and fellowship is declared.]

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Anonymous WELS Husband's Second Post


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Clergy Adultery Is Not a Victimless Crime":

I said I wouldn't post here again but now I recant again. To Pastor Jackson, yest (sic) I am WELS trained in prep schools. Please forgive my typo's. To the guy who think (sic) I cannot be tru (sic), I know how to contact my circuit pastor, and visit with my district president. I even know more than one of them if that counts. I posted this because of the relief. It is like screaming in the wide open spaces just to relief (sic) stress. I made my point. I told a truthful story. These pastors know what to do. They have a God to report to. Just as you and I do. Should I go and break up their marriages and callings? I don't want anyone's pity. I am capable of making a call and complain. I am just at the edge of survival myself. Please forgive me, but telling the pastor's wife that her husband is screwing around and casuing (sic) that pain right now would probally (sic) do me in. Does she have the right to know. Yes. And guess what...I think her husband should go and tell her.

***

GJ - I mark all typos to be fair and balanced. And I have plenty of them, too. I can understand the ones above, because of the stress and pain. I try to fix my own on this blog before anyone notices. My students love to remind me about my mistakes, because they are posted online and are impossible to remove.

I have featured this story because I was appalled at the WELS clergy's attitude about adultery, which was even worse at the DP/VP level. I remain appalled.

A man who will not keep his marital vows should not be trusted to serve a church position. Winking at this sin and lying to cover this up will harden the man in his error and make matters worse for everyone. Someone who lies to cover up the adultery of his buddy on the praesidium will likely practice deception in many other areas as well. In fact, everyone can count on that habit growing like kudzu vine.

When one WELS pastor was promoted in the midst of an adultery scandal, a journalist asked SP Gurgel about it. Gurgel's response was to ask another pastor, "Did you tell the newspaper?" I was also asked. I said, "I don't deal with journalists." The Gurgel response sounds like a guilty verdict, certainly more of an institutional reaction than a Biblical response.

Another typical WELS response came from an anonymous poster who accused me of posting a fake story. Accusing a man anonymously strikes me as the depth of cowardice and malice. That is how the WELS grapevine works. When something unpleasant but true emerges, the sources are vilified. For example, when DP Ed Werner was arrested for sexual assault (convicted, went to state prison), the minor girls involved were accused through the WELS grapevine - and the DP excused. No, he just slapped two girls who were obnoxious in confirmation class. That is why few ever question Holy Mother WELS.

Herman Otten told me that Sig Becker was disgusted with the adultery and drunkenness of the WELS clergy. This was after Sig left Missouri for WELS. Becker was familiar with the failings in the LCMS clergy, but he evidently saw a much higher lapse rate among the WELS clergy.

Questions about Obama's Certificate of Live Birth


Governor Palin Confirms the Hopes of Many,
The Fears of Some, By Shopping at Wal-Mart




By Kevin Kelly

Published:

Monday, October 13, 2008 3:04 AM EDT

GALLIPOLIS — Gallipolis Wal-Mart shoppers were at first surprised and then excited on Sunday to find a national political figure in their midst who was, just as they were, picking up a few things she needed.

Accompanied by her youngest son Trig, security, staffers and a small pool of news media, Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin stepped off the “Straight Talk Express” bus to enter the store around 1:30 p.m., where she purchased a bag of Parents’ Choice brand disposable diapers and a toy.

But it was also an opportunity for the first-term Alaska governor to meet the public at large and win some votes for the ticket on which she’s running with the GOP White House nominee, U.S. Sen. John McCain of Arizona.

Palin did not have time to answer questions from the media following her trip through southeastern Ohio, but left some folks exhilirated at meeting her.

“It was so exciting,” said Pat Miller of Patriot, accompanied by her daughter Amber, a student at South Gallia High School. “She seemed to be very sweet, and if she could stop and take the time to buy some diapers for her son, it tells you that for her, family is first.”

UOJ Rave On LutherQuest (sic)



KJV Proverbs 1:7 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction.


LutherQuest (sic) has a rave going, on the topic of Universal Objective Justification. Cardinal Cascione started the thread.

The learned commentary is hilarious. Especially egregious are the pronouncements of Heidenreich, who once understood how blasphemous UOJ was.

Do they touch upon the Formula of Concord (as in Concordia Seminary, Concordia Publishing House, Concordia College - all LCMS)? No, they simply engage in free associating with various terms they have borrowed or invented.

When they read from the source of UOJ, they may be a bit red-faced. That will have to wait.

One hint: the source is not Lutheran.

UOJ and Church Growth go together like apple and pie, like Cascione and Werning, like Kelm and Fooler Seminary.

---

Epitome, Formula of Concord, Epitome


13] 6. Also, we reject and condemn the error of the Enthusiasts, who imagine that God without means, without the hearing of God's Word, also without the use of the holy Sacraments, draws men to Himself, and enlightens, justifies, and saves them. (Enthusiasts we call those who expect the heavenly illumination of the Spirit [celestial revelations] without the preaching of God's Word.)

4] 2. Accordingly, we believe, teach, and confess that our righteousness before God is (this very thing], that God forgives us our sins out of pure grace, without any work, merit, or worthiness of ours preceding, present, or following, that He presents and imputes to us the righteousness of Christ's obedience, on account of which righteousness we are received into grace by God, and regarded as righteous.

5] 3. We believe, teach, and confess that faith alone is the means and instrument whereby we lay hold of Christ, and thus in Christ of that righteousness which avails before God, for whose sake this faith is imputed to us for righteousness, Rom. 4, 5.

6] 4. We believe, teach, and confess that this faith is not a bare knowledge of the history of Christ, but such a gift of God by which we come to the right knowledge of Christ as our Redeemer in the Word of the Gospel, and trust in Him that for the sake of His obedience alone we have, by grace, the forgiveness of sins, are regarded as holy and righteous before God the Father, and eternally saved.

7] 5. We believe, teach, and confess that according to the usage of Holy Scripture the word justify means in this article, to absolve, that is, to declare free from sins. Prov. 17, 15: He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the righteous, even they both are abomination to the Lord. Also Rom. 8, 33: Who shall lay anything to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth.

Kelm Accepted the Call to the Love Shack



I would rather own GM stock.


I read on the Bailing Water Blog that Kelm accepted the call.

According to one source, SP Schroeder advised Parish Services last year not to issue that call to anyone.

So this involves more than a Church Growth disciple coming back to spread Fuller doctrine around. Church and Change imagines itself in charge of the synod, since its board member, Bruce Becker, is also the Administrator who issued the call without informing the elected Synod President, Mark Schroeder.

Those familiar with WELS know how quickly news gets around the whole synod. Imagine how much more so this is true at The Love Shack. And yet they managed to keep the news of the call from the Synod President until the information reached him in the regular Call Report. That means they all agreed to keep it a secret from him. That sounds like little boys, or more accurately, like little girls.

The last WELS convention wanted to get rid of everyone at The Love Shack at once, no matter when their terms expired. That shows how disgusted people were with the Gurgel-Mueller administration. The Love Shack is full of their appointees, like Bruce Becker.

The first triumph of the Church Growth Movement in WELS was getting their rag, TELL, issued from the synod office with the blessing of SP Naumann. The second achievement was getting Kelm appointed as head of evangelism (Fuller doctrine) at The Love Shack. They bragged about it in TELL.

The Church Growth faction in WELS has a long history, going back to its Pietistic, unionistic roots, revived in many ways by the influence of Richard Jungkuntz. They will fight to remain dominant, to push Schroeder from office, and to install someone of their choosing.

---

Pastor X has left a new comment on your post "See What I Mean?":

Covering up is not unique to WELS. I will never forget the day I met with a DP, handing him a packet containg documentation of fraudulent business practices within a district organization where I was employed. He looked straight at me, laughed and said, "Well, what do you want ME to do about it?" When I told him that these illegal, not to mention sinful, practices needed to stop, he thanked me for coming and wished me well. Soon after, I was dismissed from my position.

***

GJ - Pastor X, thank you for reminding us that this is also about money. Everyone wondered how WELS became insolvent and used up its designated funds during the avalanche of Schwan funds, the largest charitable gift ever in America. Gurgel fired the treasurer for telling the truth, that these funds could not be pilfered.

Gurgel, as District Pope, presided over the MilCraft disaster, when his district got a prosperous business as an estate gift, ran it into the ground, and went to court to defend itself against the widow who was supposed to be supported by that gift. (The husband, who usually dies first, leaves everything to charity, as long as income goes to his widow during her lifetime.) So Gurgel's administrative genius finished MilCraft, ended in an expensive lawsuit, and cost another $1 million when WELS had to fork over that penalty.

KJV Isaiah 10:1 Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees, and that write grievousness which they have prescribed; 2 To turn aside the needy from judgment, and to take away the right from the poor of my people, that widows may be their prey, and that they may rob the fatherless! 3 And what will ye do in the day of visitation, and in the desolation which shall come from far? to whom will ye flee for help? and where will ye leave your glory?

So WELS members and pastors said, "Just the man to replace Mischke. We have found someone to make us grateful for the Mischke years." And they did.

---

Bailing Water Comments on the Kelm Ultimatum:

Anonymous said...
Count me as a double "!".

As Rev. Kelm and Prez Schroeder share the vision, perhaps now Rev. Kelm can, with Prez Schroeder's backing get the Synod (that is, all the gloomy conservatives, like those on this blog) on board to start thinking and creating cutting edge ministeries as they have at St. Mark's in DePere and get this Synod into the 21st century and get it out of its stuck in the mud, going nowhere, roots!

October 15, 2008 10:32 AM


Anonymous said...
Sorry to interrupt, but did anyone hear about how the LCMS conference in Kewaunee, Illinois for the "Oktoberfest" at which four former WELS pastors gave presentations about the WELS went? (I heard that at least one of Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary professors was going to go to defend the WELS.)

October 15, 2008 11:24 AM


Anonymous said...
The Parish Consultancy program is an excellent program and I think that the Synod should have all the congregations have the consultants come in and do an evaluation and the congregation can accept or reject its recommendantions. I think pastors who don't let them in are afraid of what they might find in their churches.

October 15, 2008 12:14 PM


Anonymous said...
"I think pastors who don't let them in are afraid of what they might find in their churches."

No, I think pastors who don't let them in are wise for not allowing Kelm to come in and push CG methods onto their congregations.

October 15, 2008 3:37 PM


Anonymous said...
"No, I think pastors who don't let them in are wise for not allowing Kelm to come in and push CG methods onto their congregations."

Well, since Kelm and the Synodical praesidium share the same theology, you probably should "mark and avoid" and join the CLC.

October 15, 2008 4:04 PM

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Back Online



Cox Internet went down minutes after the install, followed by the TV.


The repair people were great. I guess they don't move staff to repair from the collection department, the way Qwest does. I asked one Qwest person, who was being astonishingly rude, "Were you hired for your personality or were you trained to be like this?" The response was slamming down the phone, which is supposedly against the rules.

Funny Church Sign Sequence


A reader sent this in, and it is funny.

See What I Mean?




Clergy adultery is not a sin: it's a hobby. Addressing the issue is a sin.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Clergy Adultery Is Not a Victimless Crime":

Mr. Jackson,

You wrote: "No, I did not write this. No, my buddies did not write this. I do not know who wrote it, but I thought it sounded authentic."

You don't know who wrote it and you only "thought" it sounded authentic? But you still printed it anyway? I can now understand why people think you are always breaking the Eighth Commandment. Is this why you're not a pastor anymore?

***

GJ - And there's more. See what I mean? This guy must be on disability or collecting a salary for no work done:

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "See What I Mean?":

A pastor is one who has a call to serve a congregation. Even the Augsburg Confession says so. Who issued your call? Your wife? You can call yourself a "Rev." or even a "Dr.", but not a "Pastor."

***

GJ - I suspect he was weaned on a pickle, potty-trained at gunpoint.

***

GJ - I do not know who wrote this particular rant, so I suppose by posting it I am again violating the 8th. I heard this so often in WELS that anything said in our house was followed by shouts of "Eighth Commandment!"

"You didn't take out the garbage."

"Eighth Commandment!"

I am a pastor, and I teach students to identify logical fallacies like the double question above: "Is this why you're not a pastor anymore?"

Note the Mr. Jackson sarcasm, etc. Poor fellow. No matter how many stinkbombs he throws, the clergy adultery situation remains the same. I could list the well known cases, like Fred Adrian's congregation losing a $400,000 lawsuit due to vicar adultery. The lawyers for WELS even listed many cases of abuse, and I have that list from the victim's lawyer. During the trial they knew of no cases at all, but the judge thought otherwise when presented with some facts provided by a former WELS pastor. The judge ordered WELS to tell the truth.

Court cases are another symptom of the problem. When the synod leaders cover up and deceive people, lawyers have a chance to make a killing.

Clergy adultery and the WELS-ELS coverup attempts are the reason I am no longer a WELS pastor.

Still Awaiting Word on the Kelm Call to The Love Shack, WELS



Fuller-trained, DMin in Church Growth from Our Lady of Sorrows LCMS Seminary in St. Louis, Paul Kelm has tirelessly promoted Reformed doctrine his entire career.


QUOTATIONS BY AND ABOUT PASTOR PAUL KELM (WELS)

"TELL has served the church faithfully for 15 years. Three editors have served; Ronald Roth (1977-84), Paul Kelm (1985-88), and the undersigned since 1989...The lead article in the first issue of TELL was titled 'Church Growth - Worthwhile for WELS.'...The author of this article in April 1988 issue of TELL concludes, 'It's obvious by now that I believe we in WELS can profit greatly from the writings of the church-growth leaders.' ... TELL as a separate publication ends with this issue. Nevertheless, the focus of The Evangelism Life Line will continue for years to come as an integral part of the new Board for Parish Services journal - PARISH LEADERSHIP.
Rev. Robert Hartman, TELL (WELS Evangelism) Summer, 1992.

"Our synod now has a fulltime executive secretary for evangelism. He's the Rev. Paul Kelm; and we need him. We need him to be our evangelism advocate."
Rev. Ron Roth, The Evangelism Life Line (WELS), Winter, 1985 p. 2.

"The Network of WELS Small Group Leaders. 1. Information on active/interested small group leaders. 2. The Resource Sharing Network led by Divine Savior in Indianapolis, Indiana [Pastor Dan Kelm]." WELS Campus Pastors, Small Group Training Conference, Jan. 7-9, 1991, Madison. p. 19. Finding the Receptive: People in Transition, by James Witt - "The Bible illustrates the people-in-transition receptivity principle very well. Converts such as Naaman, a leper; Ruth, a widow; the woman at the well, a five-time divorcee; the thief on the cross, a convict near death; were all people who in a period of transition were receptive to hearing the Gospel. The Receptivity-Rating Scale shown at left...
Paul Kelm, editor, The Evangelism Handbook, WELS Evangelism Appendix III,

"MOTIVATING AND ORGANIZING THE CONGREGATION AROUND THE GREAT COMMISSION" [This is the Donald Abdon view of relating all church structures to evangelism, as noted in Valleskey's PT notes.]
Paul Kelm, editor, The Evangelism Handbook, WELS Evangelism

"Don't let the world paint us into a corner of antiquarianism on subjects like a six-day creation or verbal inspiration."
Rev. Paul Kelm, "How to Make Sound Doctrine Sound Good to Mission Prospects," p. 13.

"Thesis Seven: Sound Apologetics Can Make Sound Doctrine Sound Good...Logic never converted anyone; but Christianity is logically defensible, once one makes reason ministerial to God and His Word...Read C.S. Lewis, Francis Schaeffer and Josh McDowell for practical apologetic tools. In fact, lend your copy to the prospect whose intelligence and education have become his curse. Once you've read Josh McDowell's 'Lord, Liar, or Lunatic' argument for the deity of Christ, you'll find yourself using it."

Rev. Paul Kelm, "How to Make Sound Doctrine Sound Good to Mission Prospects," p. 14. "PLANNING, long-range or short-range, should be S-M-A-R-T...specific...measurable...accepted...realistic...timed...."
Paul Kelm, editor, The Evangelism Handbook, WELS Evangelism p. 3.

"A last word on sound doctrine is in place. Sound doctrine must be distinguished from tradition, praxis and preference. The liturgy, translation of the Bible, vestments and organizational policies of the church are not equatable with sound doctrine." Rev. Paul Kelm, "How to Make Sound Doctrine Sound Good to Mission Prospects," p. 3. "Doctrines in controversy and applications to those doctrines are a disciple's meat. They are swallowed only after patient doses of discipling milk. The art of mission work is to preserve that sequence despite a prospect's desire to chew what he can't swallow."
Rev. Paul Kelm, "How to Make Sound Doctrine Sound Good to Mission Prospects," p. 3.

"Non-Christians usually become good prospects for personal reasons or as I like to say: 'They come for sociological reasons and stay for theological reasons.'" [Note: this is the felt needs approach of Fuller, also endorsed by Pastor Forrest Bivens, now a professor at Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary: "I went to Fuller Seminary and I happen to believe we can use sociological methods to bring people to church so we can apply the Means of Grace." Midland circuit get together, attended by Pastor - now DP - John Seifert.]
Rev. Paul Kelm, "How to Make Sound Doctrine Sound Good to Mission Prospects," p. 4.

"Thesis One: Sound Doctrine Sounds Good When Good People Sound it. Normally, people respond to other people before they respond to doctrine."
Rev. Paul Kelm, "How to Make Sound Doctrine Sound Good to Mission Prospects," p. 7.

WELS Mission Counselors' NEWSLETTER, April, 1992: authors are - James Woodworth, Disciples of Christ; "Net Results," March, 1991; Roger K. Guy, Disciples of Christ; Arnell P. C. Arn, American Baptist Church; Jane Easter Bahls, Presbyterian; C. Jeff Woods, freelance writer and minister; Lyle Schaller, United Methodist; Pastor Paul Kelm; Pastor Jim Mumm, WELS; Pastor Peter Panitzke, WELS; Pastor Randall Cutter and Mark Freier, WELS; First Congretional Church, Winchester, MA."
Pastor Jim Radloff, editor, WELS Mission Counselors' NEWSLETTER, April, '92, 2929 Mayfair Road Milwaukee, WI 53222. [GJ - Note how many WELS pastors listed here have left the Lutheran Church.]

"The mistaken announcement by a reporter from another Lutheran body was clearly repudiated in the March 15, 1992 issues of The Northwestern Lutheran. Yet you boldly state that the WELS continues to be a part of this project, in which it never participated. Dr. Jackson, I ask you to repent of your slanderous lie and retract it publicly. Galatians 6:1-2 leads me to ask this of you, for the sake of your spiritual life. Titus 3:10 urges me to ask this of you for the sake of the church. cc: District President Robert Mueller, Vice President Paul Kuske, Vice President Gerald Schroer, Rev. David Grundmeier, Rev. Gary Baumler."
Pastor Paul Kelm (WELS), Letter to Gregory L. Jackson, 9-23-92.

"Your September 21 article in Christian News perpetuates a lie, slanders leaders of your church and risks spiritual offense to weak brothers and sisters. You describe a conference on leadership in which fellowship lines were clearly drawn and at which testimony to the truths which separate Lutherans was publicly given as 'a joint ministry conference with a liberal agenda.' Then you add, 'Months later, the three groups [ELCA, LCMS, WELS] joyfully announced a joint religious radio show, Joy, also funded by Lutheran insurance money. WELS participated in 'Joy' from the beginning and continues to be a part of the project.'"
Pastor Paul Kelm (WELS), Letter to Gregory L. Jackson, 9-23-92.

"Small churches need not be small thinkers, but small-thinking churches will always remain small. Churches and people seldom go/grow beyond their expectations."
Rev. Paul Kelm, "How to Make Sound Doctrine Sound Good to Mission Prospects," See Waldo Werning and Robert Schuller for the same thought. Did the Apostles know this? p. 6.

"Small thinking churches typically budget to remain small."
Rev. Paul Kelm, "How to Make Sound Doctrine Sound Good to Mission Prospects," See Waldo Werning and Robert Schuller for the same thought. Did the Apostles know this? p. 7.

"Evangelism upside-down is starting with the subjective issues of perceived reality and working back to God's objective truths of ultimate reality - sin and grace. It's offering the attendant blessings of salvation as the 'hook' to gain an audience for God's plan of salvation." [felt needs used to sell the Gospel]
Paul Kelm, The Evangelism Life Line (WELS), Fall, 1985 p. 4.

"Upside-down evangelism may begin with different diagnostic questions. What do you want out of life? lets the other person pick the path for witness. How do you feel about where our society is heading? uncovers fears and needs without becoming too personal. What makes people happy (or unhappy) do you think? allows someone to express preceived [sic] needs in the third person."
Paul Kelm, The Evangelism Life Line (WELS), Fall, 1985 p. 5.

"Upside-down evangelism doesn't begin with personal sin and guilt, but rather with the consequences of sin. Societal consequences (for which each day's newspaper provides evidence) are the 'perceived need' door to understanding the alienation of life and people from God."
Paul Kelm, The Evangelism Life Line (WELS), Fall, 1985 p. 5.

"It's just easier for many people to work backwards from the subjective to the objective in their thinking. In fact, upside-down evangelism may start with gospel and work back to law, stating the solution as a prelude to the problem and clarifying both at the cross." [This is Moravian Pietism, as shown by Walther's Law and Gospel.]
Paul Kelm, The Evangelism Life Line (WELS), Fall, 1985 p. 5.

"Upside-down evangelism follows the path of least resistance to the God of gracious acceptance."
Paul Kelm, The Evangelism Life Line (WELS), Fall, 1985 p. 5.

"Lifestyle evangelism is the merger of visual and verbal witness, by the people Jesus intended, in the way that He modeled. It's the primary element in a church's strategy to win the lost." [Other endorsements from Rev. Burton Bundy, Church of the Lutheran Brethren, and Dr. Erwin Kolb, LCMS]
Rev. Paul Kelm, Evangelism, WELS
Your Invitation! Kent Hunter, (D.Min., Fuller; S.T.D., LSTC) Church Growth Center, Corunna, Indiana 46730 Phone 219-281-2452 Invitation for Heart to Heart Workshop,

"When planning the service, Rev. [Dan] Kelm and the worship committee decided immediately that there wouldn't be any organ music and that the usual Lutheran liturgy wouldn't be used."
Carol Elrod, "Pastor Hopes Seeks Will Find Way to Special Church Service," Indianapolis Star, May 12, 1990 printed in CN

"The role model for this carefully choreographed and rehearsed service, referred to by Rev. Kelm as a 'seeker service,' is Willow Creek Community Church in Barrington, Ill., near Chicago, an independent congregation formed 14 years ago...Rev. Kelm said he viewed a videotape of a service at the Chicago-area church before planning the first seeker service for Divine Savior, which is affiliated with the Milwaukee-based Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod."
Carol Elrod, "Pastor Hopes Seeks Will Find Way to Special Church Service," Indianapolis Star, May 12, 1990 Reprinted in CN


"Church growth theory suggests the need for seven fellowship groups for every 100 members."
Pastor Paul E. Kelm, The Evangelism Life Line (WELS), Winter, 1985, p. 4.

---



"The peacock is an image of heretics and fanatical spirits. For on the order of the peacock they, too, show themselves and strut about in their gifts, which never are outstanding. But if they could see their feet, that is the foundation of their doctrine, they would be stricken with terror, lower their crests, and humble themselves. To be sure, they, too, suffer from jealousy, because they cannot bear honest and true teachers. They want to be the whole show and want to put up with no one next to them. And they are immeasurably envious, as peacocks are. Finally, they have a raucous and unpleasant voice, that is, their doctrine is bitter and sad for afflicted and godly minds; for it casts consciences down more than it lifts them up and strengthens them."
Martin Luther, What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 642.

"There is a false, ungodly, carnal zeal that does not come from God and is not produced by the Holy Spirit, but is rooted either in animosity against those who teach a different doctrine or in the selfish thought that a display zeal will bring the minister honor, at least in certain congregations, or in fanaticism. In the days of Christ, what zeal in the discharge of their office do we behold in the high priests, elders, scribes, and Pharisees who opposed Christ!"
C. F. W. Walther, The Proper Distinction between Law and Gospel, trans., W. H. T. Dau, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1928, p. 380.

Two Factors Militate Against Closing Down Clergy Adultery



Visiting the synod official - an allegory.


Two factors keep the clergy adultery situation from being addressed.

Number One - Public Relations
The organization does not like to admit its failures, so leaders are tempted to cover up. This is true of all denominations, but also true of schools, hospitals, counseling organizations, even political parties. The adulterery is confirmed in his sin and his lies, and the organization wins a willing defender, someone owned and operated by those covering for him. "Remember, you owe me!"

Number Two - Innocent Suffering
The innocent suffer most from these incidents: spouse, children, friends, clergy who have to follow the trust-breaker. One minister wrote about following an adulterous pastor who had an affair with the lay leader's wife. The lay leader could not bring himself to trust the new pastor. The suffering radiates far from the original act of betrayal.

I look around a see a vast array of pastors who looked the other way when church workers murdered their wives, when other church workers left their wives for a hot chick in the parish. Coverinig up is not a career-ending move - it is career enhancing, a chance to become a seminary president or even a sect president in the Little Sect on the Prairie. The same person who does nothing about Stolzenburg working with and identifying with an ELS mission will force a minister out for disagreeing with His Popeliness.

As Slick Brenner predicted, "There is a time of judgment coming for WELS."

Clergy Adultery Is Not a Victimless Crime


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Another Obama Mentor: Frank Marshall Davis, Commun...":

Dear Pastor Jackson,

I am in a hotel room tonight. Bad thoughts revolve in my mind. I am broken and dismayed. I read these posts on this blog and wonder why.

I recently had an employee walk into my office. She shared with me her affair with her WELS pastor. It was hard to take the news. I was disappointed but maybe for not the reason you think. I confronted my employee about the seriousness of the situation. She said I could do nothing as her pastor and she had agreed not to pursue a relationship. I asked her how her husband who is the chairman of the school would feel at the next council meeting knowing her (sic) wife slept with her pastor. Again, my friend said I could do nothing. A mistake and nothing more. I confronted the pastor. He too said it was between her and him. How could he go to the meetings with her husband there, I asked?

I work in a WELS ministry. I am broken. 20 years ago a trusted vicar and I thought a friend had an affair with my wife. He got her pregnant. I took my lumps and moved on. I am still married. The vicar now a pastor.

I don't always agree with Pastor Jackson and his views on this site. I also know that this site is viewed more often than it is admitted.

To my pastor, I hope you understand why I now haven't been to church for 8 weeks. The memories are hard again. Maybe you might understand a little more now why I expect more of my pastor than others. I am sorry if I pressed to (sic) hard on you or your associate.

To my employee who now left, go in peace. To the pastor who had an affair with my wife, I hope I can forget you once again with this memory renewed by a different pastor.

I sit in my hotel room tonight and wonder. I think of my failings. I think of my daughter and my wife. I think of ending it. But I will not. I will press on. I wonder if those pastors on my board, if they really knew of the pastoral pain caused on me would look different upon me if they really knew my story. They are kind and supportive but I also guard myself against them. I don't want to be hurt again. Maybe it is time for me to move on in my work. Maybe it is time for a new church although I know they have all the same faults.

So I guess I will go back...and listen again to the Word...but when he preaches on the 6th I will look at him...and try my best to make it through...if my pastor only knew.

This will be my last post on this blog. To all of you who seek to reach out with the word of God and save souls for Jesus, God be with you. For those of you who whine about members lack of support or help or criticism of you not getting your work done, well maybe it's time to look deeply into your members (sic) eyes. Maybe, just maybe, you have no idea of the pain they have because of no less, the church.

---

A WELS Pastor has left a new comment on your post "Another Obama Mentor: Frank Marshall Davis, Commun...":

This note has got to be a fake....If this person was (sic - contrary to fact, at least in the writer's mind) involved in WELS ministry, he would know exactly who (sic) to take this to, and this pastor would no longer be in the ministry...This is a fake that you or one of your buddies put on here in order to lambast the WELS again! Sorry, Greg, but I simply don't believe your commenter!

[GJ - Proofreading indicates that both authors are WELS-trained.]

***

GJ - I am posting this in the hopes it will convince synodical leaders that covering up for adulterous pastors is sinful, wrong, unethical, and damaging to far more people than anyone suspects.

I see that someone has already posted the allegation that I or one of my buddies made this up. The slander-machine is set on high volume today: slandering in the name of citing the 8th Commandment. No, I did not write this. No, my buddies did not write this. I do not know who wrote it, but I thought it sounded authentic. I have seen similar accounts of husbands damaged by adulterous clergy.

When I tried to raise this issue in Columbus, Wally Oelhaven accused me of "taking cheap shots" at the three divorced pastors (three out of six) in the area. I thought adultery and husband of one wife were topics addressed in the pastoral epistles. I must have been wrong. The cover-up artists, who had to deceive a lot of people, painted themselves as compassionate and evangelical. They were evan-jellyfish, apparently soft but really poisonous and dangerous.

Long ago an LCA district president pointed out how dangerous pastoral counseling could be. Vulnerable women can look for confirmation of their worth and flatter a minister at the same time. No other professional can knock on a door without an appointment and expect to be welcomed. That can be very useful or extremely dangerous. The pastoral epistles discuss these dangers. False doctrine and adulterous behavior go together. Adulterating the Word makes it easier to adulterate the marriage vows.

Covering up for clergy adultery has been especially damaging to the Christian Church. The laity know of many clergy who have had affairs, divorced, married their mistresses, and stayed in the ministry, sometimes after leaving briefly to sell frozen food or repair furnaces. Some adulterers get promoted immediately when caught, if they have the correct false doctrine. One Michigan District VP had his affair covered up by his buddy the District Pope. When the affair was uncovered, the VP became a WELS nursing home administrator. A member of the VP's congregation ceased his plans for becoming a pastor. He was disgusted by the affair, the coverup, and the promotion. Multiply that a few hundred times over and the results are not church growth.

Contrary to what A WELS Pastor said, it is usually hopeless to go to anyone in authority in WELS. That may change, but it will take a long time. The first loyalty is to seminary classmates, not to the Scriptures. Secondly, Holy Mother WELS must be protected. Thirdly, no one is allowed to disagree with the District Pope. Trying to get past that thicket of corruption, arrogance, and deception is a chore. The ELS is exactly the same. Bethany Seminary president spoke in his class against discussing these issues becase "it hurts the face of the church." Image first - families be damned. That can only come from the Little Sect on the Prairie, whose buildings were all funded by a man who divorced to marry the wife of his manager. She divorced, became a Lutheran, and went back to Rome when St. Marvin of Schwan died. Money can convert someone to the Lutheran cause, as she proved.

I offer as Exhibit A for the defense -

Floyd Luther Stolzenburg is still serving as a Lutheran pastor in Columbus, Ohio. His LCMS District President forced him to resign "for cause" on a Saturday and preached as Floyd's replacement on Sunday. Floyd followed his ex-wife to Columbus and settled into St. Paul's (faux-WELS at the time, now a member of WELS). Soon he got a wealthy member to fund an organization to make him a faux-pastor. Wally Oelhaven told me, more than once, "The plan was to move Floyd into the WELS ministry after five years." DP Robert Mueller and VP Paul Kuske set up the organization. After Floyd had caused enough trouble through LPR, and remarried, VP Kuske recommended him for a parish, Emmanuel, which had left the ALC. Another WELS pastor also recommended Floyd. Both WELS men wrote letters in favor of Floyd. His old LCMS DP did not. Note Ichabodians that Floyd never joined WELS, never went through colloquy, and swore he would never be WELS. Yet WELS lined up to flatter him into this clergy position. The initial contract was for one year, which Floyd neglected to tell Kuske and Mueller. Then the job was extended.

Roger Kovaciny helped raise money for Thoughts of Faith through Floyd's church, which had an embezzlement scandal. ELS Pastor Jay Webber had no problem with Kovo working through Floyd. ELS Pastor (now ELCA) John Shep had no problem with this lucrative arrangement. People challenged Shep about this, so his response was to slander me. Funny - he praised me to one supporter of Thoughts of Faith while attacking me when writing to another person. When the attack email was quoted to him by the supporter, he refused to answer. That is how to make the big bucks in the ELS.

Floyd had nothing but support from the entire Michigan ministerium and especially from the Columbus clergy. And yes, I went to all the authorities, whose response was to take action - against me. They did me a favor in their spite and vindictiveness. And now I can post so others can have a hearing.

Kevin Leman, a fine Christian writer, has this interesting take on adultery - it never turns out well. Clergy should stop romanticizing an utterly destructive sin.

On a positive note, there are some new WELS leaders who can make a difference if they have the support of faithful members. There are plenty of unrepentant laity who will always support false teachers among the clergy. The faithful pastors and leaders need support too.