Sunday, August 8, 2010

On Plagiarism



Ach! Do your own work, gentlemen.



'Intrepid Lutherans said...

Pastor Spencer here.

I just have to put my two-cents in on the discussion of "canned" anything. Simply put, I'm against it! I don't care whether its a sermon, a Bible study, a Stewardship program, and Outreach program, or whatever. Pastors were - or at least were supposed to be - trained to do all these things themselves and to think for themselves and do their own work. This plagiarism has had a terrible effect on the entire life and work of our churches. Pastors congregations pay them for their work, not someone else's. In my view, each and every time a Pastor uses someone else's work - whether he admits it or not - whether it came from the publishing house or synod headquarters or not - he should give back a chunk of his salary!!!

One of the reasons why the WELS has gotten herself into such a financial mess over the past 20 years or so, is the hue and cry from lazy Pastors for more and more "helps" from mommy synod. When the synod administration was exploding, I kept asking the leaders why, and they kept telling me - "This is what the men in the field keep asking for." Guys were demanding "help" for youth groups, senior groups, couples groups, Bible classes, evangelism Sundays, stewardship plans, worship ideas, and so on and so on and so on ad nauseum! So, one after another after another "Board," "Committee," or "Administrator" was created, given an office, big fat salary, staffed, and then became "essential" to the work of the synod. Poppycock! All because guys refused to do their own work. And their congregations let them get away with it all. I bet we could fix 75% of our financial problems if we would just close down 2929 completely, get rid of most of the "administrators," and force every single Pastor in the synod to "sink or swim" on his own. Make them do their own work or go find a different job!

And that's my take. Thank you!

Pastor Spencer

The Tenth Sunday after Trintiy



Cover by Norma Boeckler



The Tenth Sunday after Trinity


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn # 652 I Lay My Sins on Jesus 1.24
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual
The Gospel
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #190 Christ Is Arisen 1:52

Jerusalem Surrounded

The Communion Hymn # 308 Invited Lord 1:63
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 350 Jesus the Very Thought of Thee 1:53

KJV 1 Corinthians 12:1 Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have you ignorant. 2 Ye know that ye were Gentiles, carried away unto these dumb idols, even as ye were led. 3 Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost. 4 Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. 5 And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord. 6 And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all. 7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal. 8 For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; 9 To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit; 10 To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues: 11 But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will.

KJV Luke 19:41 And when he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over it, 42 Saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes. 43 For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side, 44 And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation. 45 And he went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold therein, and them that bought; 46 Saying unto them, It is written, My house is the house of prayer: but ye have made it a den of thieves. 47 And he taught daily in the temple. But the chief priests and the scribes and the chief of the people sought to destroy him, 48 And could not find what they might do: for all the people were very attentive to hear him.

Tenth Sunday After Trinity
Almighty and everlasting God, who by Thy Holy Ghost hast revealed unto us the gospel of Thy Son, Jesus Christ: We beseech Thee so to quicken our hearts that we may sincerely receive Thy word, and not make light of it, or hear it without fruit, as did Thy people, the unbelieving Jews, but that we may fear Thee and daily grow in faith in Thy mercy, and finally obtain eternal salvation, through Thy Son, Jesus Christ our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

Jesus Weeping Over Jerusalem
This Gospel reminds us of Jesus’ foreknowledge of the destruction of Jerusalem. Thus we know what He said before it happened, and we know how true this is from the accounts of Josephus. This lesson is a warning to all believers, not to depart from the Word of Truth.

Luke 19:41 And when he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over it,
There are two passages where Jesus wept. One was at the sight of his friend’s tomb – Lazarus. The other occasion is here, where He considered the future destruction of Jerusalem and the suffering to come from that event, only 40 years after His death and resurrection.

Before this time, Jesus considered the future of Jerusalem and His ministry to that historic city.

KJV Luke 13:33 Nevertheless I must walk to day, and to morrow, and the day following: for it cannot be that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem. 34 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy children together, as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings, and ye would not!

Jerusalem had a long history of turning away from God’s prophets, with inevitable hardship to follow. We can see modern examples, such as Russia and Germany abandoning the Gospel – Russia to Marxism, Germany to Modernism and Unionism, only to create millions of deaths in their WWII struggles. Would either country have done the same things, if they had known the future?

Jesus continued:

Luke 19:42 Saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes.

Lenski wrote, “Resist the beginnings” in one commentary, and this could be the motto of many nations.

Israel was conquered many times over, becoming a Roman territory because of internal squabbling. They invited the Roman Empire to come in as peacemakers, and the Romans never left.

Jesus was born in Rome-occupied territory because Israel invited it. And that is why the Roman soldier and the Jewish tax collector for the Romans (the publican) were so hated. The tax collectors were their own people, extorting taxes to pay the soldiers who enabled them to extort tax money and keep them an occupied state. This naturally paved the way for the rebellion which destroyed Jerusalem – Hebrew for “a place of peace.”

Jerusalem did not see what was coming, yet Jesus’ foreknowledge allowed Him to see the implications of all that would come.

How many Americans knew they were voting for the wreckage of their country? They voted for moderation, hope, and change. They got the necessary consequences of placing a Saul Alinsky student in the White House, with another Saul Alinsky student as the Secretary of State:
http://www.tysknews.com/Articles/dnc_corruption.htm

Yesterday I read about cities closing down all their libraries and planning to destroy their book collection. States are tearing up concrete roads to replace them with gravel. California is simultaneously bankrupt, with the GOP governor urging homosexual marriage upon the very people who voted against it (Proposition 8).

Flint Michigan is already bulldozing areas of the city where houses are empty and proving to be hazards. Some houses in Detroit sell for $1000. The average value there is $10,000. State pensions were once considered completely secure, but now everything is in doubt. The best job now is a federal job, because the federal government gets the tax money directly to pay the tax collectors, a lot like Rome.

43 For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side, 44 And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation.

Jesus spoke about a future time, about 40 years from that moment, when Israel would rise in open rebellion against Rome and suffer the consequences. As I learned on recently, the worst thing that happened was an early victory. The first rebels defeated a small Roman force, and that made them bold. No one seemed to figure that Rome never sued for peace, never gave up. The Empire always struck back. The 55,000 miles of paved roads allowed the military to move with great speed toward any destination. They could bring with them thousands of slaves to increase the amount of work done in attacking a city.

To keep Roman soldiers busy in England, the commanders had them build a wall. Hadrian’s wall stretched across the island, East to West, and remains impressive today.

http://www.hadrians-wall.org/

Rome attack Jerusalem by building a wall around the entire city, which is one of the best defended sites in the world. Trapping the citizens in made it impossible to feed everyone. In time starvation led to horrible tragedies taking place. Some are too awful to publish in a sermon. Josephus, who was there, told about it.

The city was packed with religious pilgrims at the time.

It was said, in spite of all the problems, that the only way the city could have fallen was the will of God. Jerusalem was that difficult to capture. Once the city fell, the soldiers killed and took into slavery all they wanted. The leveled the Temple, looking for gold.

Lenksi:
“44) The city and her children or inhabitants were to be dashed to the ground, the latter to be slain; and this destruction was to be so radical as not to leave one stone on another—an absolute and utter ruin. Ἀνθʼ ὧν = “in return for that which” and is usually translated less precisely “because.” Jesus reverts to the guilt of Jerusalem in that she did not realize “the season of her visitation,” ἐπισκοπή, which is used regarding both a gracious and a punitive visit. The verb is used in 1:68, 78; 7:16, “to look in upon someone.” God’s looking in upon us with his grace continues until a certain time; then those that refuse that grace shall receive a far different visitation from him whom they have spurned.( Lenski, R. C. H. (1961). The Interpretation of St. Luke's Gospel (969). Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Publishing House.)”

Israel rebelled and lost in 70 AD and repeated the error about 50 years later. This gave the Jews and Christians the worst possible reputation. Jerusalem was banned as a haven for Jews. Some say the area never recovered from the devastation of those campaigns.

Christians shared in the ignominy because they were considered a branch of the Jews, and they were. Many Jews believed in Jesus in the apostolic times.

The final result of this 70 AD rebellion was the killing and enslavement of Jews. As slaves they were scattered around the civilized world, because their numbers depressed the price slaves.

Because Christians were persecuted, they were driven from place to place, taking the Gospel with them.

We now have the time of visitation. America as a whole has abandoned the Word of God. There is no respect for our religious heritage. All the mainline churches are falling over each other to endorse what their own liberal members find repugnant – homosexual ordination and marriage. But that is only the symptom of the wholesale rejection of God’s Word by the same denominations.

When “The Last Temptation of Christ” came out as a movie, great consternation swept across sections of Christian groups considering themselves conservative in one way or another. Jesus was just a man. The Gospel was a fraud, etc. I did not watch the movie because I already knew about the book. My Unitarian friend loved it – he had been LCA. I wrote a movie review saying the plot was nothing new – it was exactly what ELCA and all the mainline churches had been teach for some time.

And yet, no one thought it was bad for conservative Lutherans to work with ELCA. They still do not.

In fact, one group leaving ELCA has already considered sending its future pastors to ELCA seminaries. I know – sounds ridiculous. Everything lately has been on the same level of moronic behavior: doing what is safe rather than what is right. The corporate mentality leads people to take the safe route each time.

There will be great volumes of nattering going on about the decline of our country. All the statements about the symptoms will be correct. However, just as we see in the country as a whole, complaining about the symptoms will not change them. The foundational causes must be addressed.

We are too few and too small to make much difference overall, but we can begin with the basic steps for turning away from the upcoming tragedy of America – both in the civil and religious spheres.

We can remain in the Word and trust in that Word, avoiding those who would turn us away from it in the name of a false peace.

Lutherans astonish me with their ability to talk up Luther without considering what he faced. The entire religious establishment was against him. The Emperor of Europe hated Germans in general and Luther in particular. Only the Muslim distraction kept the Lutheran Church protected during those fragile, early days.

Luther argued that the Word alone was more powerful than all the forces arrayed against it. At any given moment, our human wisdom and experience tells us why we should trust in ourselves instead of God. The Holy Spirit teaches us in the Word that He can turn the greatest evil into the greatest good.

Jesus was even more alone in His battle against Rome and the religious authorities. All someone had to do was be regal and Rome was threatened. Jesus was and is the Messiah, the King. That title and His power threatened Rome. We can say, “But His Kingdom was not of this world.” But politicians never think that way. They think about the threat to their own security.

Rome hated and feared Jesus and used its power against Him. The religious authorities were also filled with bitter hatred. Luther emphasized this strongly. Jesus taught an alien righteousness. All righteousness came from faith in Him. That destroyed the claims of anyone who thought man’s righteousness came from within. The civil and religious threat combined to make Jesus a victim of Roman justice and Jewish betrayal. While one man protected Luther (the elector Frederick), no one protected Jesus. He might have called upon legions of angels to destroy the Roman forces, but He allowed Rome to carry out its sentence in conjunction with the Jewish leaders.

Thus the Holy Spirit turned the crucifixion of Jesus into the atoning death of the Messiah. What looked like weakness and defeat was God’s victory over sin, death, and Satan. As one early writing said, “God baited the hook with Jesus, and Satan was captured.”

Greek Christians chant, “By death trampling on death.”

Justification by faith means believing in this Gospel message, the central message of the Bible. All portions of the Scriptures are built around this Promise.

One objection to justification by faith is comical – as if it focuses on man. I can only ask, “Who justifies, declares us innocent? Does man declare himself?”

God justifies, so justification by faith emphasizes the action of God upon man, who only receives in faith what God promises in grace.

Saturday, August 7, 2010

More Evidence from Pastor Tim Glende (Groeschel Emerging Liberal Cult)





From Pastor Tim's websty:

"But Christ Teaches:

Because Christ paid the penalty for our sins on the cross, God now looks on us as his innocent children. Although we continue to struggle with sin, in God’s eyes we are completely justified. This forgiveness of sins Christ won for us on the cross is completely and totally a free gift from God (Eph. 2:8,9). In no way, shape, or form do we deserve the gift, there is nothing we can do to accept the gift, and we cannot even cooperate with God in the reception of the gift (Eph. 2:8-9). Instead, God the Spirit works faith in our hearts to receive this gift of justification (1 Cor. 2:14). This is what Paul means when he says that we have been saved “by grace” (Eph. 2:8). Christ teaches that believers were chosen for salvation before creation (Eph. 1:4-6) but Christ does not teach that unbelievers were chosen for damnation before creation. Rather, the rejection of this gift is entirely the result of each person’s own will and has nothing to do with God’s will. Christ wishes all to be saved and gave his life for every person in the entire world (John 3:16)."

Does the Word of God teach this?

KJV John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

If the wrath of God abides on unbelievers, then God is not looking on them as "innocent children" (an odd phrase by itself) and as "already justified."

The fake Ichabod has a lot in common with Tim Glende, including an obsession with promoting UOJ.

This peculiar form of Midwestern Universalism is easily blended with the emerging church types who really have no doctrine. Groeschel grew up United Methodist (no doctrine) attended a Disciples seminary (extreme Left - they teach jointly with Unitarians in Indiana), and began working with Andy Stanley, a stealth Babtist.

The fake Ichabod condemns reading Lenski, but Glende copies Groeschel verbatim. He hides this on his websty because he knows that my research team downloads and keeps documents as evidence. Those who attend St. Peter in Freedom, Wisconsin are confronted with an all-Groeschel congregation, including bulletin inserts.

We all know from the past that Glende lies to his congregation. He pretends to be going to WELS pastoral conferences when he is going to Andy Stanly and Marc Driscoll (cussing pastor) events. Bishop Katie got the picture of Tim and Ski gorging themselves when they were all out to learn from Driscoll.

UOJ are Antinomian legalists. There is no Law, but they apply their man-made law to everyone else. For example, Glende can attend all kinds of unionistic religious worship services. Why is that?

The fake blogger seems terrified that someone might read the commentary (Lenski) that every WELS seminary student buys, but Glende has no problem with Stanley, Groeschel, Driscoll, and who knows what else.

The fake blogger hides his identity. Glende stopped Twitter (supposedly) once I began reading his Tweets and reporting them. Bishop Katie kept on and gave great descriptions about what they and five other WELS workers were doing at unionistic worship conferences.

A pastor must be apt to teach, but Glende has shown himself to be as inept as the fake blogger, which is why I think he is the fake. Here is Glende stumbling through a little Christology:

"But Christ Teaches:
When our imperfect natures made us unable to keep God’s law, Jesus was sent by the Father to fulfill the law for us (Matt. 5:17). Since God is Jesus’ father, Jesus is one-hundred percent God and completely sinless. At the same time, by being born from a virgin woman he became one-hundred percent human at the same time as God. Even though completely God, he took on the form of a servant and laid aside his full godly powers. Therefore, he endured suffering, temptation, and humbled himself to a shameful death (Phil. 2:7,8). By suffering and dying, Jesus took the punishment that should have been ours, and through his perfect obedience he became a ransom for us (Isa. 53:6, Matt. 20:28). This is why Christians proclaim that the forgiveness of sins has been gained entirely through Jesus, that God has literally justified all people (2 Cor. 5:21). On the third day after his death, he rose from the dead and ascended, assuring us that he was who he claimed to be and that our sins were certainly forgiven (Rom. 4:25)."

I do not know where to start, except to wonder in awe and astonishment that he graduated from any Lutheran seminary. But wait, he played football, and that trumps everything else in WELS.

Tim tries to hide a lot. Why is he ashamed of Stanley and Driscoll, if they are the salvation of WELS?

He cannot hide his inability to grasp and teach the basics of the Faith. Too bad he grew up under the odious influence of Floyd Luther Stolzenburg.



Episcopal Hip Hop - With Their Own Bishop Katie - Flanked The CORE (WELS)



Matthew Davies/ENS
Bishop Cathy Roskam of New York feels the beat on the streets of the Bronx at the Trinity Hip Hop Mass July 2 (Matthew Davies/ENS)
Matthew Davies/ENS
Bishop Cathy Roskam of New York with D. Cross at the Trinity Hip Hop Mass July 2. (Matthew Davies/ENS)
Episcopal News Service
Pipes and Pedals in Los Angeles, Hip Hop in New York
Parliament of the World's Religions to open July 7 in Barcelona
To Read: GIVE US GRACE: An Anthology of Anglican Prayers




- - -

'Go forth and tell it like it is':

Roskam raps at Hip Hop Mass

By Matthew Davies

[ENS, New York, July 6, 2004] Picture this: an altar; an earth-shattering sound system; people of all ages "jamming to the groove"; and an Episcopal bishop rapping and feeling the beat. It�s the revolutionary liturgical outreach unfolding in the Bronx and it�s taking religion to the streets in the language of today -- Hip Hop!


"My sistas and brothas, all my homies and peeps, stay up -- keep your head up, holla back, and go forth and tell like it is." With this proclamation, Bishop Suffragan Cathy Roskam of New York sent people on their way at the Bronx's third Hip Hop Mass, held Friday, July 2 at Trinity Church of Morrisania.

The new civil rights
Honoring the founders of hip hop, the three-hour extravaganza attracted some big names in the genre, including the legendary Kurtis Blow, King of Rap; Cool Clyde, True Pioneer of Rap; Jeannine Otis, Rap Hall of Famer; and the human beatbox, rapper D. Cross.
The initiative behind the Hip Hop Mass came from Trinity Church's rector, the Rev. Tim Holder, after listening to young people in his neighborhood. "This is the first time anything like this has happened on the East Coast," he said. "Hip hop is the culture; it's the people. When it began it was all about speaking to the oppressor. Hip hop is the new civil rights."

Two dozen Episcopal, Lutheran, Protestant and Roman Catholic clergy and lay people have so far joined in the development and celebration of the Hip Hop Mass, including Bishop Don Taylor of New York, who offered a blessing at the first ever street mass on June 11.

Trinity Church has a regular congregation of 150 on a Sunday morning, consisting primarily of young people. "We needed to grow and open the doors," Holder said. "So, in addition to events such as the Hip Hop Mass, we started offering a breakfast after the 8 a.m. Eucharist as there are many kids around here who really appreciate that."

Roskam and Holder spoke about their hopes and goals for the Trinity Hip Hop Mass. "We want to sing the 'new song' of Jesus Christ in the vernacular and language of our younger generations," they said. "We hope that the Trinity Hip Hop will serve as a model for other parishes and communities throughout the city and the church."

The Rev. Martha Overall, rector of St. Ann's Episcopal Church, South Bronx, and a member of the Hip Hop Mass working group which has been meeting for three months, said, "Many children often attend services in the Bronx without their parents. They literally understand that there is something good for them there."

Education and positive messages
DJ Lightning Lance, who with his cousin Cool Clyde recorded the first "scratch" on vinyl, highlighted the message that hip hop should be delivering. "It's not about money or fancy cars or bling bling [jewelry]," he said. "It's about education and speaking for the oppressed."

Agreeing with Lightning Lance, Clyde said that hip hop is about positive messages. "It's a tool we use to escape violence and do positive things with," he said. "We want to tell this to the whole world." To cheers from the congregation, Clyde proposed that everyone gets together to create a hip hop museum in the Bronx to honor the roots of its culture.

Kurtis Blow, the first commercially successful rap artist and author of The History of Rap [http://www.rhino.com/Features/liners/72851lin.html], thanked the Lord that he was able to attend the Trinity Hip Hop Mass. "It's truly a blessing to see all this materialize," he said. "It's the first time I've ever seen anything like this -- hip hop religion in the Bronx." Blow, instrumental in raising up a generation of rappers, declared that he had been looking for a church home and said that, after witnessing Trinity Church, he'd be at the 8 a.m. service. "I'm shivering inside; I feel the Holy Spirit in this room," he said. "I'm going to make it a mission of mine to let everyone in the Bronx know that this is happening. This church is going to grow."

Assemblyman Ruben Diaz Jr., a Bronx Democrat, said hip hop is a way of life and is about putting emotions into rhythm, beat and dance. "Hip hop needs to be used in education," he said. "If you ask a student to write a song about civil rights they'll learn more than you could ever teach them. We need to attract our youth and young people back to the church."

During the sermon, Roskam spoke about what hip hop means to her and the message that it conveys. "I had always been aware of hip hop but I've learned so much about it from this neighborhood," she said. "The best of the hip hop tradition is love, pride and respect. Jesus taught us to love our enemies. We need to preach the whole word of Jesus, and that is to love everybody. Love wins in the end and that's where our victory is."

The Master Mix and Master Missal, written, adapted and arranged by members of Trinity's congregation and people drawn from the community, translated sections of the Book of Common Prayer into a more colloquial representation of hip hop culture. One of the leading lights of the translation effort is Lamont, a teenager from St. Paul's Church in the Bronx, who wrote the Pontifical Hip Hop Blessing to conclude the mass. Lamont said the mass is a great way to meet new people and show off the best of hip hop culture in the Bronx.

Other highlights included versions of the 23rd Psalm, adapted by Ryan Kearse, and the confession, adapted by Tom Mercer.

The 23rd Psalm
The Lord is all that, I need
For nothing
He allows me to chill.
He keeps me from being heated
And allows me to breathe easy.
He guides my life so that
I can represent and give
Shouts out in his Name.
And even though I walk through
The Hood of death,
I don't back down
For you have my back.
The fact that you have me covered
Allows me to chill.
He provides me with back-up
In front of my player-haters
And I know that I am a baler
And life will be phat
I fall back in the Lord's crib
For the rest of my life.

Confession and Absolution
Merciful God
We confess we have sinned against You and our Neighbor.
We have not done right by You.
We have not done right
by other people.
We are sorry.
We want to change.
Remember Jesus, Your Son.
Have mercy and forgive us.
From now on may we try to do what you want,
To the glory of Your Name. Amen.

It's Cool.
God has forgiven you.
It's a done deal!

The Bronx outreach follows other hip hop ministries in Episcopal congregations, notably at St. Stephen's, Hollywood, California, among others. Friday hip hop masses run 5-8 p.m. until July 23 at East 166th St and Trinity, South Bronx.
--Matthew Davies is staff writer of Episcopal News service


***

GJ - All things considered, most would prefer polka!



ELCA Hampered in Its Spread of Apostasy by Lack of Funds



Mark Hanson is straight -
He was featured on BadVestments



ELCA BLUES SERVICE
August 6, 2010
ELCA Churchwide Organization Details 2010 Budget Reductions


CHICAGO (ELCA) -- The Aug. 4 actions by the Church Council of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) to reduce the 2010 current fund spending authorization for the churchwide organization affected a variety of ministries, especially those administered by the five program units of the church.

The council reduced this year's churchwide current fund spending authorization by $4.2 million to $65.1 million, a reduction of 6.1 percent from the previously authorized $69.3 million. The council is the ELCA's board of directors and interim legislative authority between churchwide assemblies.

There were no staff reductions in this revised spending authorization, said the Rev. M. Wyvetta Bullock, ELCA executive for administration.

Nearly three-fourths of the churchwide organization's funding is assigned to its five program units. Funding in those units reduced by the council action is as follows:
+ Evangelical Outreach and Congregational Mission, $400,000
+ Global Mission, $448,000
+ Multicultural Ministries, $94,870
+ Church in Society, $131,000
+ Vocation and Education, $592,000

Specific ministries and programs affected by the reductions in these units were international scholarship grants, the elimination of some unassigned funding for starting new congregations, significant reductions in grants to colleges and universities, and smaller decreases in seminary and campus ministry grants, Bullock said. Other reductions include decreases in program activities, general office, administrative costs, and position vacancies, she said.

Other churchwide units, including the Office of the Presiding Bishop and subunits, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Treasurer and subunits, plus the service units, Communication Services and Development Services, were reduced a combined total of nearly $627,000.

Other reductions were $1.7 million from the general treasury and $200,000 in a strategic initiative fund.

Nearly all of the reductions came from a decline in mission support funds, which are provided by congregations through synods to churchwide ministries, said Christina Jackson-Skelton, ELCA treasurer. She reported that through June 30 mission support income declined about $3.7 million or about 15 percent from the same period in 2009. By the end of 2010, Jackson-Skelton said she expects mission support income to be about $51 million, nearly $9 million less than what was remitted in 2009.

Reasons for the decreases in mission support income were attributed to economic instability that continues to affect all parts of the church, compounded by some unfavorable responses to the 2009 ELCA Churchwide Assembly actions on sexuality.

Bullock explained that ELCA churchwide organization leaders have been spending below approved levels and have engaged in ongoing financial contingency planning. That process will continue to identify further reductions if needed.

In a related but separate process, the churchwide organization is involved in an organizational redesign process announced earlier this summer, a response to continuing declines in income. A committee of the churchwide organization, working with outside consultants, the Church Council executive committee, the Conference of Bishops and the Living Into the Future Together (LIFT) task force, is creating a plan to restructure the churchwide organization to align its work with anticipated income. Details of the redesign process are expected to be announced toward the end of September.


Friday, August 6, 2010

Killing Us Softly with UOJ



This photo is the work of the Appleton blogger, who loves UOJ and Church Growth.
Pastor Tim Glende has not answered if he is the fake blogger and Anonymouse.


Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Bored-Again Lutheran":

Mr. Bored touches on an interesting fact. That Objective Justification as it's falsely confessed in the Lutheran Synods is not openly taught to congregations. When Pastor DP Buchholz necromanced it during a sermon it was the first I had heard it from him after two + years. And that, I believe, was prompted by Gurgle asking him to give his 2005 conference paper. It is, after all, one half of their central doctrine of faith. Something is rotten in Denmark. They are afraid to openly and publicly testify to the scope and breadth of this false teaching. They communicate it softly every now and then but it's seldom heard and caught by the few alert laity over the purring of the congregation. The majority of the laity have never heard the term or the full teaching - this we confess and this we condemn concerning UOJ. I seriously hope that Dr. Jack Kilcrease, if he can maintain his self confidence long enough, publishes a book on UOJ so that more people are exposed to everything that is being taught and confessed.

Mr. Bored, a good approach would be to take a copy of Siegbert W. Becker's Justification essay to your pastor and say, "Pastor XYZ, I've heard you confess your belief in Universal Objective Justification. Having studied this doctrine by reading our WELS This We Believe confession, DP Buchholz' 2005 Conference essay and SW Becker's often referenced paper (include Mark Zarling and H.A. Preus if applicable) I contend that it teaches another gospel than Scripture teaches, confuses Christ's atonement with the distribution of Christ's righteousness to the whole unbelieving world for the forgiveness of sins, destroys the faith given by grace of the Holy Ghost and so much more. Can we talk about this? I've brought SW Becker's essay as a good starting point since his defence of UOJ is also a defense of the Kokomo statements and a rejection of Justification by Faith alone."

A Pastor who is not in on the deception will be more than happy to talk about it. One who is complicit in the deception will be annoyed, arguementative and demeaning. That comes with the territory since the Christ, the Holy Ghost, God only dwells in His children who are heirs to eternal life through faith in Christ alone and confession of the pure doctrine of Justification by faith alone. The others do not have Christ because of a confession in a false gospel and are led by their father below - thus the violent reception to discussing Justification as taught by Scripture and the Lutheran Confessions.

You'll even find some who warmly welcome the discussion initially then when they realize the implications of what has been done with UOJ they will make a choice between Christ or men and the result will be reflected in their appearance and attitude.

In Christ,
Brett Meyer

***

GJ - Because the UOJ Stormtroopers are Antinomians, nothing is too low for them. Wherever they appear on the Internet, they are deceptive, vicious, and cowardly. Their lack of scruples is matched only by their bad manners. And yet they howl with faux-pain about anything truthful.



Twins Explained as Plagiarism




Bored-Again Lutheran



Old Lutherans prefer good spelling.


bored has left a new comment on your post "Still Clueless":

Of course my comment was purposefully inflicted with spelling and grammar errors. I thought I'd been sufficiently thorough to avoid an explanation. Good night KFax! Your first clue should've been that I referenced spell-check's 'little red line' underneath misspelled words. To wit, if I possessed the wit to write that, wouldn't it seem obvious that I purposefully ignored those 'little red lines' in my own comment? Please don't apply your own standard to me. But hey, I'm not looking for a fight.

The WELS deficiency in spelling and grammar is a symptom of a larger overarching problem in that synod. For a long time, their Modus Operandi has seemed to be to willfully minimize the importance of the 'little things'. At least, I think so. They change the pronouns in the Creeds. We can guess it was done to be less paternalistic. "Oh, it's no big deal", they say. "It doesn't detract, and it might make those with a modern mindset more comfortable". Likewise, it's not unimaginable that the WELS began to use the NIV because it's problems were "only minor", or that the NIV's so-called benefits overshadowed its problems. There's a long list of very important little things that are commonly ignored or purposefully ejected. Maybe that could be the Ichabod-reader contest? To compile a list of "little things" that the WELS has gone soft on?

Of course there's the big problem with Universal Justification, but could it be that all the loss of the important little things allowed the nastiness of Universal Objective Justification to express itself? That's just a hypothesis, of course. I've been trying to make sense of the fact that a good number of Confessional Pastors claim to believe UOJ. The Confessional Pastors to whom I'm referring pay a lot of attention to the little things, and maybe this keeps them on line with a true teaching of Justification. I suppose I'm saying something pretty obvious, but my curiosity for causation (of this hip trend towards apostasy) leads me to pose the question anyway. In any event, if the fastidious translation of ancient sacred texts is unimportant, it's probably too rediculous to require accurate spelling. (Yes KFax, I misspelled rediculous on porpoise)

Another question: what is the best way to approach my pastor, who claims to believe UOJ (in private, when I inquire), even though he continues to correctly teach Justification?

***

GJ - Ask him how often he reads Ichabod. That is a good conversation-starter.


Good Follow Up for Satan's Sex Ed at The CORE (WELS) -
Satan Figure Distributing Holy Communion



Catholic Mass - note the male Satan figure too.

WELS/ELS did not have the spine to ban women consecrating Holy Communion, a practice started by Larry Olson's Fuller-inspired Staff Ministry program.

"Resist the beginnings." Lenski.

This Halloween Mass would be a good follow up after doing Satan's Sex Ed. Fortunately, WELS has a number of women already playing the role of pastor, so donning a red wig and horns would not be too much of a leap.

---

Dan at Necessary Roughness has left a new comment on your post "Good Follow Up for Satan's Sex Ed at The CORE (WEL...":

"For our faith and the sacrament must not be based on the person, whether he is godly or evil;, consecrated or unconsecrated, called or an imposter, whether he is the devil or his mother, but upon Christ, upon his word, upon his office, upon his command and ordinance." -- LW 38, 200.



The Purpose of the Confessions



Martin Chemnitz, Concordist, argued in effect,
"Our truth is the truth of the ages,"
not the truth of the moment.


Recent posts from WELS members show they have no concept of the Confessions.

The Ecumenical Creeds are the Apostles, the Nicene, and the Athanasian. The Apostles Creed is so old that no one knows the exact origin. Each phrase is from the Scriptures. The Nicene Creed is the result of bitter controversy over the Two Natures of Christ.

Like the Apostles Creed, the Athanasian Creed has mysterious origins. The newest of the Ecumenical Creeds is over 16 centuries old.

They are called Ecumenical Creeds because the entire Christian Church uses them or accepts them. WELS covets anti-confessional sects that do not use the Creeds in worship, but those denominations (Babtist, Mission Covenant, Ev. Free, United Methodist) are not opposed to the three Creeds. Didja ever wonder why the Creeds disappear from Shrinker services? They emulate the Enthusiasts in abandoning the Creeds.

When we recite the Creeds, we are confessing the truth of the Word of God, with the believers of all ages, all nationalities. Every Lutheran should be familiar with the three Ecumenical Creeds and recite them during a calender year. They begin the Book of Concord to show that Lutherans are confessing the truth of the ages.

Therefore, WELS is arrogant to pretend that their tiny sect can alter a Creed to satisfy its misbegotten feminist agenda. The Nicene Creed does not belong to WELS by virtue of being used in previous hymnals. The Athanasian Creed, which was also butchered, did not originate with the Wisconsin unionists who gathered together in 1850, 15 centuries after the fact.

A non-believer or believer should hear the same confession of faith, regardless of denomination. There may be slight changes in wording, but a wholesale slaughter is the same as saying, "We can do whatever we want."

Liturgical traditions are extremely conservative. That is why a lectionary from a much later date is just as valuable to a text critic as a manuscript from an earlier time. Churches and synagogues have been loathe to change wording for the sake of novelty.

Once started, what prevents a sect from avoiding the male terms altogether in a future edition of the unionistic creeds? WELS is simply following a trend set by the LCA/ALC in placing themselves over the Word of God as judges of His revelation.

Lenski said, "Resist the beginnings."

"We did it before and we can do it again" was a great WWII motto, but it is death to a Lutheran synod.

Anyone can glance around and see that WELS, Missouri, and the ELS are not confessional Lutheran bodies. They are far more serious about confessing Fuller or Rome than agreeing with the Book of Concord. The CLC (sic) is simply worse - more hypocritical, more immoral, more corrupt.

See Sasse on this point. Missouri treated him like dirt.

All the apostasy trends of 25 years ago are stronger than ever now. This process is similar to politics. People become de-sensitized to the latest vulgarity and error, so new steps can be taken in the same direction.

As several posted, "I don't see what is wrong with the WELS Creeds."

That is the problem.



Thursday, August 5, 2010

More Inspiration for Appleton

Not possible, you say? This is from one of the oldest congregations in the US - Episcopalian.
Alexander Hamilton is buried at this church.
Trinity-Wall Street Episcopal Church.

---

The clown: symbol of "divine foolishness".

Note to Self: Bring Big Floppy Shoes and Round Red Nose to Church May 22

April 27, 2005

Dear Parish Family,

On May 22, Trinity Sunday, we will have a Clown Eucharist, "doing church" as if we were a circus come to town. We will celebrate the Eucharist and learn about the basic traditional outline for Eucharistic worship by experiencing it and participating in it from a new perspective.

It will likely be a surprise to see clowns inside Trinity Church, but think about it this way: how we perceive the world in light of our relationship with Jesus could rightly be called foolish. Jesus looked at things in a new and strange way - a foolish way. But, as St. Paul said, the foolishness of God is wiser than the wisdom of the world. Paul declared himself a fool for Christ's sake.

He held that in common with a Trinity clergyman of years ago, who I understand would walk up and down Wall Street at noon carrying a sandwich board printed with the words: “I’m a fool for

Christ.” The back of his board read, “Whose fool are you?”

We are all fools of one sort or another. God’s foolishness is light, joy, and life. Man’s foolishness is darkness, despair, and death. In the clown, God has shot from his cannon for us a vivid symbol of divine foolishness.

Clowns represent the underdog, the lowly, the remnant people. Their foolishness is a call to unpretentiousness. They take incredible risks - balancing on tight ropes, eating fire, keeping silent, being poked by others, or getting soaked in water. Clowns are parables in themselves, spending great amounts of energy uncovering small things, then showing forth the hidden treasure of life (like the kingdom of God) and, surprisingly to us, giving their most cherished possessions to others.

In rodeos, clowns protect people. In other scenarios, the clown may be down and out, but he is also continually raised up by a spirit within, lifting our own spirits as he overcomes life's stumbling blocks. Clowns look at the world, like parables, inside out and upside down: the last shall be first, the smallest seed is the greatest tree, and those who work all day get paid the same as those who worked an hour. To the world, this is foolishness.

Yet foolishness—the foolishness of God—is wiser than man. It brings light, laughter, joy, renewal, salvation, and life. Whose fool are you?

Years ago, I saw a film created by the Rev. Floyd Shaffer on clown ministry and worship. I hope you will find the opportunity to read his recent book, If I Were a Clown , prior to our worship together on May 22.

All are invited to come in clown dress, big hats, floppy shoes or some sort of foolish garb. Those watching on the Internet might even be foolish enough to put on some white face or a big grease-paint smile as we worship God and learn about the structure of the Eucharist by being the circus which came to town and to church on that day. I look forward to worshiping with you.

Faithfully,
Jim Cooper

More Clown Resources

Finkelstein on the Pagan Puppet Parade




This Appleton icon would make a good puppet.
Many lessons could be learned.
Real. Relational. Relevant.


Freddy Finkelstein has left a new comment on your post "Steal This, Appleton - I Need Another Belly-Laugh":

Worship reduced to pure spectacle. You can see it written on the faces, and in the actions, of the onlookers in the audience-- "onlookers in the audience" being folks who, in times past, might have been referred to as "worshipers." Now they are consumers of spectacle, the same as if they were sitting in front of the television on Super Bowl Sunday. It is revolting. The reactions of the children are the dead giveaway. They are honest, in an innocent sort of way, when innovation is thrust upon them -- "look at this strange thing and that strange thing, one after the other!" Almost like I feel sometimes after I have been duped into visiting a Lutheran CGM congregation.

Freddy Finkelstein

***

GJ - What prevents the Emerging Church model from doing the same? Nothing. "Worship is mostly adiaphora." WELS lay leader.


Steal This, Appleton - I Need Another Belly-Laugh


Presbyterians. Don't quit until the skunks come in.

Still Clueless



Not funny.



KFax has left a new comment on your post "Clueless in West Wachagootchie":

You're hardly one to criticize anyone for wasting their time or being juvenile, Pastor. Or for being a faux pastor, for that matter.

As far as bored's mess goes, you can make up whatever reason you like, and hide it with as many personal insults as you want. I could really care less.

It's sad, I agree with you on so many things such as the sadness of Church Growth and especially UOJ. But you are such a bitter, spiteful person, and you would reach so many more hearts about these important issues if you just went about it in a different way, and didn't mock everyone who debates with you at every possible chance.

***

GJ - Bored will have to back me up on this.

KFax is such a charmer. He could have been on Team Ichabod, but my sense of humor alienated him from a noble cause. Being against CG and UOJ does not require an IQ over room temperature. The trouble is, most WELS pastors lack that one attribute - or pretend to be stupid. I am not kidding. They end debates with "I am fat and stupid" (meaning I won't discuss it) or "I don't remember that."

I don't know who knocked  the specimen jar into this Wheaties, but he sure got testy the last few days, regular posting after an unlamented absence.

Faint Praise for Gaba




Name the WELS church - not Grace, but another Church and Money Changer operation.



west59wy (http://west59wy.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Gaba Does Grace, Milwaukee - Home of Fuller-traine...":

Deacon Gaba's comments are perceptive both for what is said and what isn't admitted.

First, is his critique of liturgical vestments, posture and bearing. It reminds me about what a certain LC-MS blogger pastor commented after viewing archived filmed footage of the dedication of the St. Louis seminary. Said blogger was struck by how the celebrants were attired in business suits, i.e. Gaba's "liturgical ineptitude." He was thankful for how far the LC-MS had come since that time. I conclude he meant chasubles, collars, albs, stoles, capes, copes, hose and a hundred other types of ecclesiastical foppery. That being said, the WELS, even when it tries to be "liturgical"--for example, "Grace church" which prides itself in its liturgical expressiveness--comes across with all the aplomb of a hillbilly's mullet.

On the other extreme, is the sector of the LC-MS with which Deacon Gaba is apparently so enamored. That can only be indentified in terms of Romanizing tendencies, chancel prancing, and ridiculously arcane codicils of rubric interpretation which direct the way the pastor is turn, genuflect, and land a triple axle. It's the sector from which Rev.Fr.Dr.Sir.Esq.Pr. Fenton, he of Gottesdienst fame, like others before (sic - missing pronoun) jumped to swim the Bosphorus. However, there is something to be said (sic - missing word) the DG's observation about a church operating a coffee shop. I suppose it is, in principal, no different than the combination oil and lube/coffee shop which recently opened up down the street. Whatever it takes to get 'em in. And some believe people can't see that for what it is? Give me a break!

***

GJ - Those who refuse to police themselves will find themselves examined closely. Any discussion of WELS should begin with Valleskey becoming seminary president after endorsing Fuller Seminary's doctrine in the gushing tones of a schoolgirl smitten by Johnnie Depp or the sainted Michael Jackson. Just as bad - Huebner was elected Number Two in WELS after spending his entire career promoting his alma mater, Fuller Seminary. The Soul Cafe coffee shop is just one example. His "parish consultant" scams are another. WELS cannot condemn what they love so dearly, what the ELS silently approves while claiming confessional status.

Gaba is a wee bit too Roman for me. I highlighted the remarks which were right on target.

Missouri is going Roman as a solution to 30+ years of Fuller promotion. I do not see one form of Enthusiasm as superior to the other.

Liturgical worship is still a concern. As I mentioned in the latest sermon, youth meetings at my LCA church consisted of learning a service from the hymnal (Vespers, for instance) and singing hymns. We also had progressive dinners and other social events, but never a dance at church. The annual youth service was limited to youth leading the historic liturgy. No one even suggested Rock N Roll, even though we were in the Elvis to Beatles generation. No one imagined going to church to be entertained.

We had Swedish egg coffee because Salem was a Swedish Augustana congregation. That also meant an abundance of Swedish pastries, which I took for granted until I lived in non-Swedish areas.

Gaba noticed that Huebner has introduced a number of Reformed elements into the Sunday service, not to mention the Moneychanger's cafe. Huebner is a Church and Money Changer - no shock there.

Gaba's criticisms are not nullified by his extreme Romanism. The disgust many Lutherans feel about Fullerism is the prostitution of the Sunday service:
  1. The lack of Holy Communion comes from the effort to turn worship into a recruiting service. The sacrament offends non-Lutherans, so the sacrament is made scarce - like the Confessions.
  2. Introducing the Scripture lessons is derived from the Reformed view of the Word. Huebner has mocked the efficacy of the Word in print, but has never been disciplined. Instead he has been rewarded for his union theology. The people in the pews are idiots, according to the Reformed Fuller Seminary view. They need the Word of God explained to them before it is read. Calvin would grin in approval.
  3. The coffee shop is a felt-needs gimmick, like free coffee and cookies at the bank. Reformed methods are all gimmicks. Add gimmicks to the Lutheran Church and it becomes Reformed because the motivation is pure Enthusiasm. At Victory of the Movie Theater (WELS), visitors are given a drink and a snack as they enter the service.
  4. Mocking Gaba's extreme high church tendencies does not rescue WELS from the charge of promoting and rewarding false doctrine. Huebner, Valleskey, Jeske, Kelm, Bivens, Sorum, and Olson are prime examples of WELS Orthodoxy equaling Fuller/Willow Creek apostasy.
The Intrepids have been looking at the elements of a Lutheran worship service. I would favor anything from the range of very simple liturgical services to incense and lace, as long as the Word of God is proclaimed in its truth and purity. Because we are in a confessional crisis, we must avoid appearing Reformed or Roman. I appreciate Gaba's effort in visiting Grace and reporting. It would take a SWAT team to get me into Grace, so the eyewitness account has spared me another day of agony.



Clueless in West Wachagootchie




KFax has left a new comment on your post "English 101 - Editor Edit Thyself":

How come you didn't (sic) Brett or bored? Especially bored, with his absolute slaughtering of the English punctuation system.

Or did Brett really mean that the good doctor "heard" something early this morning? You did a stealthy job of hiding his fourth grade error though.

And please publish my post this time, there's no reason to be afraid of your bias.

***

GJ - Bored did that on purpose, something which the slow-witted failed to notice.

Brett Meyer and Church Lady write better than Paul McCain, MDiv, who is an alleged CPH editor and faux pastor. Brett and Church Lady understand justification, while a significant number of Syn Conference clergy agree with ELCA's crypto-Universalism.

I cannot edit comments posted underneath, but I mentioned long ago that I edit messages from people I like and (sic) the rest. Many find it endlessly amusing that the Wisconsin sect claims a superior educational system while turning out Fuller/Mars Hill clones who cannot spell, parse, or explain the Small Catechism.

I publish juvenile messages like this one just to reveal how some people waste their time.


Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Gaba Does Grace, Milwaukee - Home of Fuller-trained WELS First VP







WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 4, 2010

Coffee & Worship at Grace WELS

This past Lord's Day, after Mass at Saint Stephen's, I mounted my brother's Huffy, and headed north, across the 6th Street Viaduct, and into the Downtown. By the time I got to Juneau Town I was a bit huffy myself, so I decided to stop in at the coffeehouse at Grace, the Wisconsin Synod Lutheran church at the corner of Juneau & Broadway, right across from the old Blatz Brewery (which has been converted into luxury condos). Actually, when I got Downtown I realized that it was earlier in the day than I thought, since we didn't have Bible study this week. So I decided that not only was I going to get something to drink in the Lutheran coffeehouse, but that I would also sit in on their late Mass, which was scheduled to begin about a half hour later.

The coffeehouse.
First I must say that I have never gone into a "Christian" coffeehouse and come out feeling like I had a really satisfying, genuine coffeehouse experience. Perhaps you, dear reader, were not familiar with the phenomenon of the Christianized coffeehouse. Fort Wayne had a couple of them, at least when I lived there. Grace's coffeehouse, Grace Place, is a modern looking facility, with a couple of friendly ladies behind the counter. They made me an adequate cup of cafe mocha. I sat down, relaxed, and read from one of the bibles that were stacked on a shelf. And so there was nothing wrong with the experience, per se. Yet, I ended up concluding that in certain ways it was not unlike those Evangelical coffeehouses I knew in Fort Wayne. Something about them gives me the heebie-jeebies. All things considered, I would rather be a Christian in a real coffeehouse than take the concept of the coffeehouse and "Christianize" it. [GJ - It was the Soul Cafe before!]

Again, I will say that those who were there were competent, and friendly. And I do not impugn the motives of those who decided to start this thing, and those who run it, for I cannot claim to know those motives. I am merely sharing some general thoughts on the concept.

On the one hand, one could say this operation is providing business for Stone Creek's coffee. On the other hand, Grace Church is also, with this coffee shop, providing a nice little business for itself. This leads to a broader question. Ought the Church be about the business of being in business? The answer, to be clear, is no; the Church is healthiest when it focuses on simply being the Church. She serves her children and the world best when she makes sure that Christ her Lord is preached clearly and relentlessly, and when her sacramental life is strong and central. I am not opposed to social activities and groups and programs and clubs rising up within a parish. That is a natural outcome of a lively ecclesial community in the modern world. What I question is when these things become official "ministries" and get organized from the top. All of this is to say that we ought to seek first the kingdom of God, and His righteousness. Then, all these other things will be added unto us.

The church.
Speaking of those fundamental things, like the Gospel and the sacraments, after I sat down in the church and the service got started, I was disappointed when I realized that it was not, in fact, a Mass at all. It had many of the basic parts of one, but without the Eucharist. This is not hugely surprising, in retrospect, but I was for some silly reason assuming when I entered and sat down, that I would get to see the celebration of the Sacrament of the Altar. So as I say, that was a bit disappointing. Of course, many Missouri Synod churches are likewise negligent in celebrating the Eucharist on a weekly basis. I wonder what Grace's eucharistic schedule is, since I haven't really seen any indication in the printed schedules, or the web site, unless it's published on the web site where I haven't yet seen it.

But before I get ahead of myself, let me say that when I walked into the church, I was greatly impressed by the beauty and upkeep of what is a classic Milwaukee church. It is about the same age as my own church, Saint Stephen's. The present structure of Saint Stephen's, if I recall, was built in 1901. Grace, from what one woman told me, was built in 1900. They are both very good examples of the type of beautiful gothic churches built by Lutherans in Milwaukee at the turn of the twentieth century. Saint Stephen's presently suffers the effects of a deeply declined and depleted parish. Grace, on the other hand, is a very lively parish, which is obviously able and willing to take good care of its physical space. One of the features which I really like is the canopy above the altar, with detailed wood columns. Large stained glass windows in the north and south transepts depict scenes from the life of Christ. There are too many details to recount here, but suffice to say it is a spectacular interior, worthy of the worship of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Upon entering the church, I was immediately greeted by three men. I suppose they were the ushers or "greeters" or what have you. They showed me where to find a worship bulletin, which comprised twelve pages stapled together, with three additional inserts. I entered the nave, and took a moment to look around the church. Then, I took a seat in the back pew. After a few minutes I noticed that the last four or five pews are reserved for families with children, so I got up, and relocated to a spot a few pews up.

At the start time, the younger of the two pastors, Pastor Daron Lindemann, comes to the front of the chancel, attired, curiously, in an alb and a stole. On the one hand, if this were to be the Mass, it would have been appropriate for him to wear a chasuble over that alb (and now I wonder if they use chasubles when they do have the Mass). On the other hand, as I say, after a while I caught on to the fact that this was not to be the Mass; therefore he ought to have worn a surplice instead of the alb. I wonder if any such distinctions are observed at Grace. If not, Grace is not alone (gratia sola non?). Too many Missouri Synod pastors are likewise infected with liturgical ineptitude to the point of not even knowing what to wear. But I digress. Pastor Lindemann stands there in front of the congregation, in what I must say is a weird stance for the chancel of the church, with his arms down at his side, giving an impromptu greeting and summary of the theme of the service. Through the rest of the service he continued to use the same posture, whether walking from one point to another, or reading the lections, or whatever, with his hands down at his side. I suppose he was told somewhere along the line that this would be a natural, or winsome, way in which to conduct himself in the church. It's goofy, and should have been corrected in his first year of seminary.

The service then commences with a hymn, "With the Lord Begin Your Task," an eighteenth century hymn translated in the modern age by W. Gustave Polack. My reaction to this hymn is twofold. First, in general I think the Church could live without hymns that tell us what to do. Hymns, at their best, should combine confessing the faith with prayer to Almighty God, rather than merely ordering us around. After singing a hymn in which I tell myself to begin my task with the Lord, maybe I should go on to sing a hymn in which I tell myself to lift high the cross. Second, it is unnecessary and less than ideal for the Church to sing hymns in which God is addressed by the pronoun "You." Did the makers ofChristian Worship: A Lutheran Hymnal do this to all of its hymns? I could page through it to get that answer, but I'm not that interested.

After the hymn, Pastor Lindemann, who already greeted the people informally, now greets them liturgically. Both this greeting, and the response of the people, are right out of the modern Roman Rite's Novus Ordo:

The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you.
R. And also with you.

At least the Novus Ordo directs the priest to say the Trinitarian Invocation before doing this greeting.

After an innovative confession of sins, there is the singing of a piece called "Oh, taste and see that the Lord is good," followed by the prayer of the day.

Before reading the Old Testament, Pastor Lindemann gives a little summary of what he will read. Not only is such a practice unnecessary, it is an unfitting, even distracting, intrusion into the liturgy of the Church. He does the same with the Epistle and the Gospel. Before the Epistle the congregation sings a Psalm of the Day, which is done in the modern, irritating style of singing a refrain after about every four or five verses. It was a setting composed by David Cherwien in 2005. It's style is reminiscent of the Hymnal Supplement 98, which I endured at Kramer Chapel. It is also reminiscent of many a modern Roman Catholic Mass I have witnessed, with the music leader trying to motion for everyone to join in the singing.

The sermon was preached by the older pastor, Pastor James Huebner. He preached on the Lord's Prayer. What I like about his preaching is that he has a rather lively manner. It actually seemed that he was preaching to me, and cared about his message. What I did not like was that it was mostly a sermon giving advice on how to pray better, but didn't really say anything about the death of Christ.

After the sermon the congregation stood and confessed the Apostles' Creed. I suppose one good thing about this not being the Mass was that I didn't have to suffer the Nicene Creed as it is printed in that hymnal, a version which constitutes, as far as I know, world Lutheranism's first feminist version of the Nicene Creed.

Then, after an offering was taken (while "What a Friend We Have in Jesus" was played on the piano), there was the Prayer of the Church, which was made up of the parts of the Our Father, interspersed with explanations of those parts. After this prayer, the congregation sang "What a Friend We Have in Jesus."

The service concluded with a concluding prayer, a final blessing, and a hymn, "Lord, Teach Us How to Pray Aright." And just when I thought I got away from "What a Friend We Have in Jesus," it was played as the postlude. Pastor Liundemann asked everyone to greet each other in the pew after the final hymn. I love meeting people, and so forth, but I wanted no part of fraternizing in the holy space of the church, so after the hymn, I slipped out of there. I retrieved my bike, and headed home.

It was an interesting experience, much that was good, and much which I hope that neither I nor anyone else will have to experience again. Over all, Grace does a magnificent job of marketing what they sell. (Already today, for example, I got a post card from them in the mail.) I'm simply less than content, as a traditionalist Lutheran, with what they are selling.

Federal Judge Approves Party in the MLC

PAPER: Judge being gay nonissue during trial...



Factbox: U.S. laws on gay marriage, civil unions

Related Topics

Wed Aug 4, 2010 5:24pm EDT
(Reuters) - A federal judge in San Francisco on Wednesday struck down California's ban on gay marriage, a ruling that, while it will likely be appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, hands a key victory to gay rights advocates.


The Supreme Court has not taken a case on gay marriage, leaving states to decide on the issue, although the California federal challenge is aimed at eventually reaching the country's top court.

---

Why not? WELS thinks it is cool and fosters deception about the video below, which is back on YouTube.




Party Poopers in the ELCA - Income Heading Down



HerChurch in California may be one reason for the decline in ELCA offerings.
Recent ELCA service - warning - you do not want to read it.
Goddess Rosary - leave that alone too.



ELCA NEWS SERVICE
August 4, 2010

ELCA Council Reduces 2010 Churchwide Spending, Acts on Pensions Resolutions


CHICAGO (ELCA) -- The Church Council of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) revised the 2010 current fund spending authorization for the ELCA churchwide organization to $65.1 million, a mid-year reduction of $4.2 million or 6.1 percent from the previously authorized $69.3 million for 2010.

The council made the decision in open session during a rare conference call meeting Aug. 4. Much of the meeting was held in executive session to discuss background information on finances and personnel, plus an organizational design process and legal matters, said Carlos Peña, Galveston, Texas, ELCA vice president and chair of the council.

The council also formed an ad hoc committee to report to it about reductions in the ELCA Board of Pensions' annuity payments to retired church workers.

The current fund spending reduction for the remainder of 2010 did not result in position or personnel losses, said the Rev. M. Wyvetta Bullock, ELCA executive for administration. Most churchwide unit budgets were reduced between about 1 and 8 percent, according to figures supplied by the ELCA treasurer.

Bullock explained that contingency plans previously developed were used to reduce the 2010 spending authorization. Officers worked with ELCA partner organizations, the executive committee of the council and liaison bishops to the council to finalize the reductions. She said the church wants to maintain its commitment to such things as missionaries and new-start congregations, but the reductions "limit our capacity to increase these numbers."

Nearly all of the $4.2 million reduction was taken from anticipated mission support income provided to the churchwide organization by congregations through the church's 65 synods, said Christina Jackson-Skelton, ELCA treasurer. Through June 30, mission support income declined about $3.7 million or about 15 percent from the same period in 2009, she said.

Sixty synods have remitted 2010 mission support income "unfavorable" to the same period in 2009, according to information supplied to the council.

Mission support income has been in a period of decline since December 2008 after five years of relative stability, according to the council information. Though it is difficult to project mission support income accurately during such periods of economic volatility, the council was told that mission support income by the end of the 2010 fiscal year is expected to be about $51 million. In 2009 actual mission support to the churchwide organization was $59.7 million.

Decreases in mission support income have been caused by the economic instability that continues to affect all parts of the church, compounded by "some unfavorable responses to the 2009 ELCA Churchwide Assembly actions on sexuality," the background materials stated.

Leaders of the ELCA churchwide organization have been spending below approved levels, and have engaged in ongoing financial contingency planning. The contingency planning process "will also continue to identify further reductions, if required," the background information said.

Council discusses redesign, forms ad hoc committee, hears update on congregations
Related to the churchwide organization's financial situation is an organizational redesign process announced by Bullock in a June 21 e-mail to staff. At that time Bullock wrote that the organization will create a plan to restructure the churchwide organization to align its work with anticipated income. The council discussed the plan's progress in executive session.

The council's other action established a representative ad hoc committee to respond to concerns raised by several synods this spring about reductions in annuity payments to retirees.

In 2009 the ELCA Board of Pensions informed some 12,500 plan members receiving benefits from the Participating Annuity and Bridge Fund that it would reduce monthly annuity payments by 9 percent annually over a three-year period. The fund suffered significant losses due to the financial downturn in late 2008 and early 2009, necessitating the reductions.

In response to resolutions from nine synods, the council asked the ad hoc committee to consult with the Board of Pensions to learn more about the decisions it made regarding the annuity and bridge fund. It also asked the committee to explore ways to restore fund losses and increase payments to annuitants and explore ways to mitigate the adverse effects of fund losses. The council asked for a report and possible recommendations at its November meeting.

ELCA Secretary David D. Swartling told the council that, as of Aug. 3, his office had been advised that 504 of 10,239 congregations have taken first votes to terminate their relationships with the ELCA. Of those, 348 passed and 156 failed. Synods have also reported that 212 congregations took second votes to leave the ELCA, of which 199 passed and 13 failed, he said.

Swartling added that of those congregations that have voted to leave, about 75 percent have said they will join Lutheran Congregations for Mission in Christ.

---

8/4/2010
ELCA Church Council trims churchwide budget by $4.2 million

After spending two hours of a two-and one-half hour conference call meeting in closed session Aug. 4, the ELCA Church Council voted in open session to cut the churchwide 2010 current fund spending authorization by 6 percent, from $69.3 to $65.1 million. ELCA Treasurer Christina Jackson-Skelton reported that, through the end of June, 2010 mission support was down $3.7 million (a 15.2 percent reduction) from the same period in 2009.

Wyvetta Bullock, executive for administration, told the council that churchwide was still trying to hold its commitment to new starts and missionaries. "We're not recalling any missionaries," Bullock said, adding that there would be some impact on grants to seminaries and others.

Spread across a variety of churchwide units, the $4.2 million cut affects some more deeply than others: Vocation and Education, down $592,000 (6.28 percent); Global Mission, down $448,000 (3.34 percent); Evangelical Outreach and Congregational Mission, down $400,000 (2.23 percent); Development Services, down $331,050 (22.06 percent); Church in Society, down $131,000 (4.72 percent); and Multicultural Ministries, down $94,870 (7.73 percent).

In a separate action, in response to requests from nine synods, the council established an ad hoc committee to bring to the November 2010 council meeting a report and possible recommendations on ELCA Board of Pensions annuity funding, losses and "steps to mitigate adverse effects of the Fund reductions."