Tuesday, August 9, 2011
Beginning the Formal Process of Termination of Fellowship and Our Response
Kyrie, eleison!
2722 Lovett Lane
Cedar Park, Texas 78613
August 9, 2011
Mr. Matt Wordell
Mr. Brad Johnson
Holy Word Evangelical Lutheran Church
10601 Bluff Bend Drive
Austin, TX 78753
Re: Termination of Fellowship
Dear Matt and Brad:
Thank you for your letter of July 31,
2011. We pray that your hearts be lifted; for times like these drive us
deep into His Word!
Psalm 119:10-16 “10 I seek you with all my heart;
do not let me stray from your commands.
11 I have hidden your word in my heart
that I might not sin against you.
12 Praise be to you, LORD;
teach me your decrees.
13 With my lips I recount
all the laws that come from your mouth.
14 I rejoice in following your statutes
as one rejoices in great riches.
15 I meditate on your precepts
and consider your ways.
16 I delight in your decrees;
I will not neglect your word.” -NIV
do not let me stray from your commands.
11 I have hidden your word in my heart
that I might not sin against you.
12 Praise be to you, LORD;
teach me your decrees.
13 With my lips I recount
all the laws that come from your mouth.
14 I rejoice in following your statutes
as one rejoices in great riches.
15 I meditate on your precepts
and consider your ways.
16 I delight in your decrees;
I will not neglect your word.” -NIV
We do not agree with your definition of
Excommunication, but suffice it to say we are thankful that you have
backed away from your position that our salvation may be in jeopardy as
inferred in your communication of May 21, 2011. Clearly stated;
Excommunication is manifest impenitence for the breaking of God’s Law,
not just manifest impenitence. Otherwise you would be excommunicating
us. Neither are we denying the forgiveness of sins or the redemptive
work of Jesus Christ as our response will show you.
We are deeply disappointed that the
Wisconsin Ev. Lutheran Synod, Holy Word Lutheran Church, Pastor
Patterson, Pastor Gurgel, Holy Word’s Elders and Holy Word’s Council
(1)
continue to believe (since you are speaking
for all) in the peculiar doctrine as laid out in your letter; by the
extremely narrow context of three (albeit truncated in the third case)
passages and almost three full pages of editorial by mere men. Clearly
you did not substantiate your position by using scripture regarding the
chief article of our faith.
Regarding Doctrinal Error and Holy Word’s Impetus for Termination of Fellowship:
You chose to lead with Pastor Schaller’s
essay (circa 1910) on 2 Corinthians 5:18-21. Schaller was one of the
Wauwatosa Theologians and it is ironic since their mantra was ’let
scripture interpret scripture’; that he would hang his hat on four
verses for this doctrine. I believe it is quite presumptuous to
conclude that if one does not believe as such that they may be a
Synergist. There is always a danger in believing we have anything to do
with our salvation or even the salvation of others. (i.e.: saving
souls.) This is the Enthusiasm that is currently plaguing many
‘christian’ denominations via the Church Growth Movement and the
Emergent ‘church’.
Let’s widen the angle a bit, shall we?
Here are the passages in context with my commentary italicized and in
parenthesis (It is peculiar that Schaller would use a portion of the
Bible that actually was referring to the relationship of the body of
believers to each other.):
2 Corinthians 5:11- 21
11 Since, then, we know what it is to fear the Lord, (This is spoken by a believer to believers since unbelievers have no fear of God.) we try to persuade men. What we are is plain to God, and I hope it is also plain to your conscience. 12
We are not trying to commend ourselves to you again, but are giving you
an opportunity to take pride in us, so that you can answer those who
take pride in what is seen rather than in what is in the heart. 13 If we are out of our mind, it is for the sake of God; if we are in our right mind, it is for you. 14 For Christ’s love compels us (Who is ‘us’? Unbelievers are not compelled by Christ’s love. Only believers are.), because we (Believers) are convinced that one died for all, and therefore all died. 15
And he died for all, that those who live should no longer live for
themselves but for him who died for them and was raised again. (Those
who live are the believers. Unbelievers would not live for Christ.
Paul has set the context here and that is all these things are through
faith in Christ.) 16 So from now on we (Believers) regard no one from a worldly point of view. Though we (Believers) once regarded Christ in this way, we (Believers) do so no longer. 17 Therefore, if anyone is (believes) in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come! 18 All this is from God, who reconciled us (Believers) to himself through Christ and gave us (Believers) the ministry of reconciliation: 19 that God was (From a former time; not Calvary but the Garden of Eden; Gen. 3:15) reconciling (Not past tense but present; ongoing; from the Garden; otherwise how could Abraham et al be saved?) the world
(2)
(God’s will is for all to be saved and has made salvation possible for all through faith in Christ as propitiator) to himself in Christ, not counting men’s sins against them. (Those who believe; unbelievers die in their sins.) And he has committed to us the message of reconciliation. 20 We (Believers) are therefore Christ’s ambassadors, as though God were making his appeal through us (Believers). We implore you on Christ’s behalf: Be reconciled to God. (If all are justified, therefore forgiven and reconciled, why would Paul make an exhortation to ‘be reconciled to God’?) 21 God made him who had no sin to be sin[a] for us, so that in him (in faith) we might become the righteousness of God.” -NIV (As in putting on the righteousness of Christ which comes through faith; Rom. 3:22.)
You continue your defense with an excerpt
from the 2005 Buchholz essay that has just one Bible reference, which
ironically speaks against your premise. Furthermore, Buchholz is in
error when he says that the Confessions equate justification and
forgiveness in a general absolution to all mankind. When the
Confessions speak of justification it is always equated with
regeneration. The regenerates are the believers.
Here is the one Bible reference in your Buchholz excerpt with my comment:
“Psalm 32:1 “ 1 Blessed is he
whose transgressions are forgiven,
whose sins are covered.
2 Blessed is the man
whose sin the LORD does not count against him
and in whose spirit is no deceit.” (Again, who is blessed and forgiven? Unbelievers? No! Do unbelievers have no deceit towards God? Of course not. Only believers are lacking deceit as they are in Christ.)
whose transgressions are forgiven,
whose sins are covered.
2 Blessed is the man
whose sin the LORD does not count against him
and in whose spirit is no deceit.” (Again, who is blessed and forgiven? Unbelievers? No! Do unbelievers have no deceit towards God? Of course not. Only believers are lacking deceit as they are in Christ.)
Proverbs 17:15 “15 Acquitting the guilty and condemning the innocent—
the LORD detests them both.” -NIV
the LORD detests them both.” -NIV
Unfortunately the Buchholz essay is
equating the atonement for sin with the forgiveness of sins. It is not
the same thing. Christ’s redemptive work (atonement) is Second Article
doctrine of the Apostle’s Creed. The Forgiveness of Sins is Third
Article and is the work of the Holy Spirit in and through the Word and
Sacraments. This is why Pastor Patterson and the rest of you are in
error when you teach a forgiveness of sins apart from hearing the Word;
apart from the Holy Ghost. If everyone is already forgiven, why bother
with anything else? By Buchholz’s own admission in his essay, he is
‘wresting terms in such a way that scriptures do not speak’. The
message of the Bible has always been that of repentance and the
remissions of sins through faith in the Savior, Christ Jesus.
Your
third point of defense is pulled from the WELS confession of faith re:
Justification, in “This We Believe”. Again, this (Romans 5:18 and
truncated at that) is in the narrowest of contexts. To put Romans 5 in
context one must go back to chapters 3 and 4.
(3)
In Romans 3:19-26, God’s Word says (Commentary as before and all emphasis mine): “19 Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be silenced and the whole world held accountable to God. 20 Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin. (No one is righteous. Period.)
21 But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. (Christ and His righteousness for all who receive Him in faith by the power of the Holy Spirit.) 22 This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. (We are in the context of faith now.) There is no difference, 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, (This is a parenthetical thought... All are sinners. Period.) 24 and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. (Verse
24 is no longer part of the parenthetical and refers back to verse 22
that all those who believe are righteous and therefore justified in His
sight and not all men.) 25 God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement,[i]
through faith in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice,
because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand
unpunished— 26 he did it to demonstrate his justice at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.” -NIV
Romans 4 goes on in detail in the example of Abraham, the father of our faith and transitions beautifully into chapter 5:
Romans 4:16 to 5:2
“16
Therefore, the promise comes by faith, so that it may be by grace and
may be guaranteed to all Abraham’s offspring—not only to those who are
of the law but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham. He is the
father of us all. 17 As it is written: “I have made you a father of many nations.”[c]
He is our father in the sight of God, in whom he believed—the God who
gives life to the dead and calls things that are not as though they
were. 18 Against all hope, Abraham in hope believed and so became the father of many nations, just as it had been said to him, “So shall your offspring be.”[d] 19 Without weakening in his faith, he faced the fact that his body was as good as dead—since he was about a hundred years old—and that Sarah’s womb was also dead. 20 Yet he did not waver through unbelief regarding the promise of God, but was strengthened in his faith and gave glory to God, 21 being fully persuaded that God had power to do what he had promised. (You have to realize that this faith that was given and worked by the Holy Spirit in Abraham enabled him to carry out the sacrifice of his son, Isaac; to the very enth degree. Abraham already believed in the resurrection and that if Isaac died, God would raise Isaac from the dead to fulfill the promise of the Savior through Abraham’s seed.) 22 This is why “it was credited to him as righteousness.”
(4)
23 The words “it was credited to him” were written not for him alone, 24 but also for us, to whom God will credit righteousness—for us who believe in him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead. 25 He was delivered over to death for our sins and was raised to life for our justification. 1 Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we[a] have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, 2 through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand. And we[b] rejoice in the hope of the glory of God.” -NIV
So far St. Paul has gone to great lengths to
establish that it is Christ’s righteousness that justifies through faith
alone. By faith (worked by the Holy Ghost) we receive His
righteousness and are therefore declared justified; forgiven.
Here is Romans 5:18 in context (the context
of faith as established in chapters 3, 4 and beginning of 5);
commentary again in parenthesis:
Romans 5:12-21
12 Therefore, just as through
one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death
spread to all men, because all sinned— 13 (For until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law. 14
Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who had
not sinned according to the likeness of the transgression of Adam, who
is a type of Him who was to come. 15 But the free gift is not like the offense. (This is key. Not only is the gift opposite of the condemnation; bringing life, but watch how else it differs.) For if by the one man’s offense many died (all die), much more the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus Christ, abounded to many. (Notice it is to many; or for many but not on all.) 16 And the gift is not like that which came through the one who sinned. For the judgment which came from one offense resulted in condemnation, but the free gift which came from many offenses resulted in justification. (resulted in; not yet imputed to us but on the One who earned it. On Christ!) 17 For if by the one man’s offense death reigned through the one, much
more those who receive abundance of grace and of the gift of
righteousness will reign in life through the One, Jesus Christ.) (This is the key…those who receive…through the One…through faith!) 18 Therefore, as through one man’s offense judgment came to all men, resulting in condemnation, even so through one Man’s righteous act the free gift came to all men, resulting in justification of life. (This verse is merely summarizing what has gone before. Verse 19 is the more important verse.) 19 For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, (all men) so also by one Man’s obedience many (believers, since what has gone before tells you who the ‘many’ are.) will be made righteous. 20 Moreover the law entered that the offense might abound. But where sin abounded, grace abounded much more, 21 so that as sin reigned in death, even so grace might reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. -NKJV (This verse drives it home…’through Jesus Christ’, or in Christ; through faith in Christ.)
(5)
A WELS pastor friend of mine succinctly
states the problems associated with the confusing verbiage of many of
WELS essays; even the statement of faith as laid out in ‘This We
Believe’ as you have stated prior.
“...We ought not speak of people as
being already justified before they are born. The Confessions equate
Justification with Regeneration. Period. And the Scriptures do the
same. Justification/The forgiveness of sins are Third Article
doctrines, not Second Article doctrines. The confusion is this, that
when some people say "God has justified the world," they mean, "Christ
died for the sins of the world." But our sloppy use of the word
"justify" has caused all sorts of problems. The latter is "redemption,"
not "justification." Some go so far as to say that God imputes the
righteousness of Christ to all people. This directly contradicts the
passage you quoted above that says that "to the one who does not work
but trusts God who justifies the ungodly, their faith is credited
(imputed) as righteousness." (- Romans 4:5 Ibid)
In Summary
We will not and cannot recant nor repent
since we are not in error and we will in fact seek a capitulation from
you and those you are claiming to represent; that Christ’s death on the
cross did not ‘justify all men’, (nor forgive them before they were
born) but rather atoned for their sins (Second Article of the Apostles’
Creed) and that sinners receive God’s grace, forgiveness and
justification; Christ’s redemptive work in their place (propitiation)
through faith alone in Christ worked by the Holy Ghost as it has been
since the fall of man. (Third Article of the Apostles’ Creed) It is
God’s will that all men be saved (1 Timothy 2:3-6). Christ’s
righteousness and forgiveness (that He won for all) is objectively for
all men. But it remains on Christ for the world (objectively) and is
received through faith alone that is worked by the Holy Spirit. To
believe that all are already forgiven before faith (as Patterson
preaches) or even saved (as the Buchholz paper claims); even prior to
hearing the Word (Romans 10:17) through which the Holy Ghost works, you
are separating the Word from the Holy Spirit. This is blasphemy.
Justified by Grace for Christ’s sake through faith,
Joe and Lisa Krohn



6 comments:
To God be the glory for such a good and faithful confession as Joe and Lisa Krohn declared above as they, by God's grace and mercy, carry the cross of Christ in this world in which His Church is persecuted by ALL denominations.
Let that sink in.
All Lutheran synods teach, as their central doctrine, the false gospel of UOJ which anathematizes Justification By Faith Alone as recently expressed in the excommunication of the Krohn family and previously by the Kokomo families. Many promote it openly, writing essays that are used to teach men, women and children their false gospel as clearly articulated by the elders at Holy Word. Many simply enable and condone it out of fear or apathy - neither of which are the fruit of faith or actions blessed by God.
All other religions teach as their central doctrine justification by works which is equal in it's violent and vicious attack on Christ's Gospel as the false gospel of Universal Objective Justification is.
It's appropriate that Holy Word (W)ELS uses DP Buchholz' 2005 essay promoting this false gospel as proof text in the excommunication process of the Krohns. The Buchholz essay was in perfect harmony with S.W. Becker's blasphemous, contradictory and antiChristian essay on Objective Justification and he carries the responsibility for much of the damage currently being wrought through his words. In reality every silent and apathetic (W)ELSian partakes in this excommunication and more importantly the clear confession of the Synod's central and chief doctrine of Justification without and before Christ's faith worked by the gracious will of God through the Means of Grace.
Time is quickly running out to take a public stand against the tide of apostasy sweeping over the world and the Lutheran Synods in particular. May God grant His Church His faith to stand openly, endure in the faith and declare His Truths to His Glory and the eternal benefit of those He calls out of darkness into eternal salvation in Christ alone.
May God continue to bless and keep the Krohn's through this trial.
In Christ,
Brett Meyer
Fake Ichabod purported this same nonsense about the reformers always claiming two causes of justification (grace of God and merits of Christ). That is just not true. The Formula of Concord states:
25] For not everything that belongs to conversion belongs likewise to the article of justification, in and to which belong and are necessary only the grace of God, the merit of Christ, and faith, which receives this in the promise of the Gospel, whereby the righteousness of Christ is imputed to us, whence we receive and have forgiveness of sins, reconciliation with God, sonship, and heirship of eternal life.
26] Therefore true, saving faith is not in those who are without contrition and sorrow, and have a wicked purpose to remain and persevere in sins; but true contrition precedes, and genuine faith is in or with true repentance [justifying faith is in those who repent truly, not feignedly].
They are taking a list of 3 and reducing it to 2. That is either deceptive or poor scholarship or both.
(I made the same comment on fake ichabod. They never posted it or answered it.)
The only Justification in the 6-1/2 pages from the group of so-called Evangelical Lutherans from Holy Word is a justification of the doctrine they teach. That doctrine is not Lutheran, has little or no Evangel, and no good news for the Krohns.
Admittedly, we might say it the clearest and most detailed explication of that false doctrine we have ever read. It is so plainly put that the errors stand out like a sore thumb.
No sore thumb is the Krohn reply. It, too, is clear and well detailed; an accurate treatment of what Lutheran doctrine is, even drawn from the marginal texts of the NIV. The leadership of Holy Word has had its preaching and teaching correctly judged. Instead of getting their backs up, those leaders should let go of the doctrines they have studied and study the doctrine of the Scriptures as properly taught in the Book of Concord.
An embarrassment in the situation is the fact that current and former high echelon leadership in the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod is key to the presentation of false doctrine.
The Krohns are not alone. Many WELS members have been treated in similar fashion though not so publically. Others have just departed unnoticed. As the Scriptures point out, these situations exist to make manifest that which is correct.
Blessings, prayers, and thank-yous to and for the Krohns and all who have borne the cross while pointing out the errors or simply understanding them as such.
Romans 3:21-25 was not used by Becker as a sedes for objective justification in his essay. That makes me wonder. Why does the WELS now use those verses?
I don't think it's because of the NIV, for the wooden translation of the KJV is just as confusing with these verses as is the NIV.
From what I can tell in the Greek, the main point being made here is that "all sin and are falling short of God's praise while being justified by grace through faith in the blood of Christ who redeemed us."
In this very sentence, "all" is limited to those who are justified by grace through faith. This, then, would make sense why Becker didn't use these verses as a sedes.
As far as Romans 3:21-26 is concerned, I don't understand why the WELS is using these verses as a proof verse for objective justification. Becker didn't use it in his essay on the sedes verses for objective justification. And this makes sense. For even disregarding the previous reference for the word "all," as well as the final remark in verse 26, the basic sentence itself limits "all" to believers. The basic sentence is this:
"All sin and keep falling short of God's praise, while being justified by grace through faith in the blood of Christ who redeemed us."
I'm sorry about reposting. I'm learning this blog stuff yet.
Post a Comment