Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Gottesdienst Online: Memo to Synod: Mind Your Own Business

Gottesdienst Online

Gottesdienst Online: Memo to Synod: Mind Your Own Business: "Naiveté can get one into trouble. I should have smelled something fishy when I received a request from the LCMS International Center to have my parish participate in a “Perceptions of Ministry Inventory,” a survey designed “to enhance the formation and professional development of parish pastors”; had I been paying closer attention, I might have wondered why the Board for Pastoral Education and the Council of Presidents wanted to assure me that my “privacy and anonymity will be preserved throughout the process.”"

'via Blog this'

***

GJ - WELS did something like this. A circuit pastor was furious about this and wrote a letter.

Soon he was out of the ministry.

Read the article and ask where millions of dollars go. In fact, you will stop asking.

Anglican Church in North America (ACNA)/LCMS Talks

Anglican Church in North America (ACNA)/LCMS Talks: "Seminary to Host Anglican Church in North America and The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod Third Semiannual Dialogue

FORT WAYNE, IN (CTS)—Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne,
Indiana will be the site for the third installment of dialogue between
the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA) and The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS), October 27–28. The focus for this
meeting will be "Contemporary Issues Facing the Church in North
America.""

'via Blog this'

The American Spectator : The Greatest Book in the English Language



The American Spectator : The Greatest Book in the English Language:

'via Blog this'


The King James Version (KJV) was born out of political compromise and royal patronage. Church life in 16th-century England was characterized by high and often violent tensions over vernacular translations of the ancient Latin version of the Bible known as the vulgate. Early translators such as William Tyndale and John Rogers were burned at the stake. When the Reformation gathered momentum after Queen Elizabeth came to the throne in 1558, the Puritans popularized the Geneva Bible, which went through 70 editions selling more than half a million copies. But when James succeeded Elizabeth, the new and scholarly king (called "the wisest fool in Christendom") identified footnotes in the Geneva Bible that he deemed to be subversive of royal authority.
At Hampton Court Palace in 1604, King James moved to end this subversion by convening a conference of established church bishops and moderate political Puritans. Keeping the latter on his side was one of James's priorities, although he was theologically opposed to their low church governance, as he showed by his comment, "No bishops, no King." Nevertheless James commissioned six committees drawn from both Puritan and Episcopalian scholars to translate a new English language version of the Bible dedicated to himself as "the principal mover and author" of the translation. So the KJV was conceived as a unifying production, endorsing the idea of a monarchical national church.

Do Not Go Gentle into that Good Night, LCMS:
You Are Worse Than ELCA, Because You Work with ELCA
AND Kick People Out of Church



Narrow-minded Lutheran has left a new comment on your post "More Proof That Lutherans in Large Groups Are Dumb...":

Nice job, Minn. South. Enjoy your $3.2-million while Missouri runs around and bad-mouths ELCA and ECUSA for kicking parishioners out of their churches.

***

GJ - I was thinking today - Concordia Publishing House has $26 million in the bank from their hymnal sales. (Remember someone scoffing about my claim that new hymnals are like minting money? It is.) CPH could have bought the building and leased it back to the campus ministry. Many different agencies could have done that. It would be hard to lose out, since the location alone made it valuable.

But readers, this is why all the Lutheran sects love to close congregations. They make the congregation pay for the mission building and land, even if the mission board did a horrible job of picking the land, the location, and the building. The members pay and pay. When the sect forecloses, the sect keeps all the money. Sometimes they let the congregation vote on which entity gets how much money.

At one point the closing of parishes was keeping many LCA districts in the black. In other words, they could pay outrageous staff salaries because they were spending the equity gained from the congregations trying to pay for their white elephants for 20 years and finally giving up.

The LCA in Michigan built an underground (earth-sheltered) building, which cost a lot of money but used very little energy. The community laughed at it and called it Holy Moley.

Wally Oelhaven's mission committee got some good land, allowed a zoning restriction on it, and erected one of the strangest and ugliest WEFs ever - and the competition was stiff. Shepherd of Peace. They moved and knocked the WEF down. The bulldozer took one jab at it and poof, down it went.

All the Lutheran groups waste millions of dollars, calling it reaching out with the Gospel. The leaders know how much each pastor makes, but no one dares to ask what the SP makes in salary and benefits.

Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Justification


Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Justification:

'via Blog this'


145 In What, Then, Does Justification of Man the Sinner Before God Consist According to the Statement of the Gospel?
    In this very thing, that God imputes to us the righteousness of the obedience and death of Christ the Mediator and thus justifies us freely out of grace, without our works or merits, alone by faith that apprehends the grace of God the Father and the merit of Christ; that is, He forgives us [our] sins, receives [us] into grace, adopts [us] as [His] sons, and receives [us] to the inheritance of life eternal. Ro 4:24–25284:510:4Gal 3:24Eph 2:8–9Titus 3:5–7.

False Teachers Mislead the Students at Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary:
Forest Bivens on Forgiveness without Faith



AC V has left a new comment on your post "WELS Meditations Agrees with ELCA: Everyone Is Alr...":

WELS Q&A

Hello, A Baptist friend of mine is having trouble with pastors forgiving a congregation's sins. Could you please explain to me what gives pastors or others the right to forgive sins. I see James 5:16 and John 20:23. Still kind of confused. Thank you.

The Bible verses you mention are appropriate. It may also be said that all passages that invite and urge us to preach the gospel are also rightly mentioned. To preach the gospel is to proclaim the forgiveness of sins for the sake of Christ and his atoning work. No one will really understand what the Lutheran church teaches about "absolution" (declaring forgiveness of sins) unless he clearly understands the truth of objective or universal justification. That is at the very heart of what we believe and teach. Long ago God has already forgiven every human being his or her sins. Christ's life and death as our substitute is finished. Nothing more needs to be done by the sinner himself. A Christian can go to any person on earth and rightly say to him, "Your sins are forgiven." To put it another way: The forgiveness of sins is not a potential fact that becomes a reality only when sinners do something to qualify for it, or even when the gospel is proclaimed and personally received through faith. It has long been a reality to be proclaimed to sinners without conditions.

When Jesus Christ rose from the dead-2000 years ago, he was raised because of our justification-because we had already been justified (Romans 4:25). 2 Corinthians 5:19-21 and Romans 3:22-23 stress the same truth.

This is why we may speak to one another to say "Your sins are forgiven" or "In the name of God, I forgive your sins." This is why a pastor, acting on behalf of all the Christians in the assembly, says the same thing. This is not arrogance or trying to "play God." It is serving as God's ambassadors and messengers, which is what we are. Perhaps your Baptist friend is thinking, "This should not be done in a large group, since there may be people who are really not repentant or who are hypocrites in that church. You cannot tell them they are forgiven, can you?" We answer in this way: "Yes, we can and must say this, for God has invited and commanded us to do so. Jesus died and took away their sins, reconciling them to him - whether they believe it or not."

Lest we be misunderstood, we also say that if we know someone to be impenitent or a hypocrite, we will first speak to that person about sin, God's wrath, and eternal damnation in hell to expose his sinfulness and allow the Holy Spirit to convict him. That is also why the absolution in our public assemblies is always preceded by a general confession of sins and expression of repentance. But the fact remains-From God's standpoint Christ died for them and took away their guilt. We tell people this whether they are believers or unbelievers. And we hope and pray that this time they will believe us so that they too will know it is true and rejoice with us in the amazing grace of God.

- F. Bivens, Archived in Forgiveness and Repentance Section.

F. Bivens, Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary

OK, so what would the Book of Concord say?:

"Let any one of the adversaries come forth and tell us when remission of sins takes place. O good God, what darkness there is! ... what does the power of the keys effect, if sins have been already remitted? Here, indeed, they also labor much more, and wickedly detract from the power of the keys." - Augsburg Confession, Apology; Article XII. Of Repentance



AC V has left a new comment on your post "False Teachers Mislead the Students at Wisconsin L...":

More Bivens:

"The Lutheran Confessions clearly speak of objective or universal justification and the imputation or forgiveness of all people prior to and aside from justifying faith (e.g., FC, Ep, III, 4,7,9; Apol., IV, 103).

But the Confessions also use terms or phrases that if torn from the context of the rest of the Confessions, could be understood to say that justification is more of a potential reality without faith (e.g., "God wants to justify," Apol. IV, 69, 180, 292; "If we believe," e.g., FC, SD, III, 13; Apol IV, 238, 296; Apol XIII, 8; "When we believe," e.g., Apol. IV, 222, 382; FC, SD, XI, 38).

Lutherans who seem to spend more time quoting the Lutheran Confessions than they do the Scriptures (AC V - What? Please explain! It's a bad thing to quote the Confessions?) have been known to pit subjective justification against objective justification and try to use the Confessions as their ally."

- "Getting The Right Message Out –
And Getting It Out The Right Way
With Special Emphasis on Public Worship and Classroom Instruction" p. 3

Wow. Typical UOJ Stormtrooper.

***

GJ - Bivens bragged about going to Fuller Seminary while gathered with the entire Midland circuit pastors, include the future DP John Seifert. That was in Seifert's driveway. Nevertheless, he told a seminarian, "I don't know where Jackson gets the idea that I went to Fuller."

WELS pastors lied so often that I began writing down their quotations in my Day-Timer, to read back to them.

WELS Stewardship Means: "What's In It for Me?"

A commission on "Christian" fund-raising
is considered unethical.
But Jeff is a Church and Changer,
like Kudu Don Patterson.

rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Tim Glende's Anonymous Blog Hosts This Anonymous P...":

The use of Cornerstone was all the reason I needed as to why I finally left my former WELS congregation. When I read the name Jeff Davis in the council report section of the monthly newsletter, I was sure that none of my efforts would convince the congregational leadership that were going down the wrong path. When I called the congregation president, he acknowledged that Davis would be getting a commission. But, it was only 3% to 5% of the money raised through the capital appeal process. Furthermore, that commission had a cap on it. I was assured that I could find out what the cap is, but that information was never divulged.
 
When another congregation wanted to take on an expansion, they asked Cornerstone first. The pastor told what one of the lay leaders said, "I feel like we are being extorted". What would be against the law in the secular realm seems to be a normal mode of operation within some circles in the WELS.

rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "WELS Tetzels Are on the Pastoral Call List":

That every member visitation may have been the content of the letter that I recently received. Since I noticed the return address of the Love Shack, I threw it in the trash without reading it. Back in the 90's, the WELS synodical leadership was bellaching about a perceived shortage of pastors. Even back then, there was at least one planned giving counselor, who was an ordained pastor, in each of the twelve districts. The irony struck me as odd. It looks like the WELS leadership is setting up a roadblock. All of the WELS travelers will be shaken down by the highwaymen if they want to pass through.

***

GJ -

Code of Ethics

FRCI adheres to the standards of practice and code of ethics, as outlined by the Giving Institute (formerly the American Association of Fund Raising Counsel--AAFRC).

Standards of Practice

FRCI provides service to non-profit organizations that serve the public’s best interest.

FRCI engages clients that represent the broadest interests of society such as: religious, educational, health care, human service, arts, cultural, humanitarian, environmental, international, and other organizations benefiting humankind.

FRCI offers services which advance the goals of a client and which directly relate to philanthropy, such as studies, campaign management, annual development programs, planned giving, strategic planning, direct mail, telemarketing, management services, executive search, public relations, marketing and communications, software developers, organization development/management, prospect research, and training. FRCI and its principals participate in the philanthropic community.

Professional Code of Ethics

FRCI believes it is in the best interest of our clients that:

  • Initial meetings with prospective clients should not be construed as services for which payment is expected.
  • No payments of special consideration should be made to an officer, director, trustee, employee, or advisor of a not-for-profit organization as compensation for influencing the selection of fundraising counsel.
  • No payments of special consideration should be made to an officer, director, trustee, employee, or advisor of a not-for-profit organization as compensation for influencing the selection of fundraising counsel.
  • Fees should be mutually agreed upon in advance of services.
  • A flat, fixed fee is charged based on the level and extent of professional services provided. Fees are not based on the amount of charitable income raised or expected to be raised.
  • Contracts providing for a contingent fee, a commission, or a fee based on percentage of funds raised are prohibited. Such contracts are harmful to the relationship between the donor and the institution and detrimental to the financial health of the client organization.
  • Fundraising expenditures are within the authority and control of the not-for-profit organization.
  • FRCI feels it is in the best interest of clients that solicitation of gifts is undertaken by Board members, staff and other volunteers.
  • Subsequent to analysis or study, FRCI should engage a client only when the best interest of the client is served.
  • FRCI should not profit directly or indirectly from materials provided by others, but billed to the FRCI, without disclosure to the client.
  • FRCI does not engage in methods that are misleading to the public or harmful to their clients; do not make exaggerated claims of past achievement; and do not guarantee results of promise to helps clients achieve goals.
  • Any potential conflict of interest should be disclosed by the firm to clients and prospective clients.
  • FRCI will not acquire or maintain custody of funds and/or gifts directed to client organization.
---

LutherRocks has left a new comment on your post "WELS Stewardship Means: "What's In It for Me?"":

It was Cornerstone that was the last straw for us. We could not give the blessings of our money to a church that was willing to take part of our first fruits and give it to an organization to do the work the pastor (and Elders)should have been doing all along; and I brought that to their attention. Patterson had time for writing a book, contributing/presenting writings/papers for this and that, workshops, retreats etc...ad nauseum. I didn't see the difference between what Cornerstone was doing and the money changers in the temple. It is all moving towards the fulfillment of Revelation anyway. 

The church is adopting from secular culture more and more and will soon look no different than the state...the beast...all in the name of the 'business of saving souls'. Ultimately we were booted over a doctrinal issue but it all ties together eventually. Guys who push the warped view of justification enable this kind of stuff to invade Christ's church. By teaching universal absolution it begets upside down evangelism and then all bets are off and anything goes. Call me a Jackson parrot. I don't care. I have seen it first hand and speak from experience. I have come back from the dark side. When Doebler told the praise band that Christ the Rock's growth was being inhibited by the band's performance...well need I say it was a wake up call of Biblical proportions? 

WELS Tetzels Are on the Pastoral Call List



Caulk, Mr Vernon L - Ministry of Christia - Milwaukee WI 10/10/2011 Christian Giving Counselor, AZ-CA and SC Districts

Hillmann, Mr Ron - Ministry of Christia - Milwaukee WI 10/10/2011 Christian Giving Counselor, SEW District

***

GJ - According to the Berg brothers, the WELS Giving Counselors get a commission on their sales. "It is in their contract. I have seen it."

Some good questions to ask the Tetzels are:
  • What financial or insurance credentials do you have? (No one can even mention a variable product without the proper license and giving a prospectus on the proposal.)
  • What life insurance credentials do you have? (No one can sell an annuity unless he is licensed in that state.)
  • How much commission do you make? Is that paid immediately or when I reach room temperature?
  • I saw you on the call list. Are you a pastor? If not, can you automatically offer communion and marry people? Or is there too little money in that for you?

    SP Schroeder writes that they are gearing up for an every member visitation across WELS. If that happens, it will be a miracle greater than the Crossing of the Red Sea. The pastors do not visit their own sick and shut-in members.

    Oh wait. This is for money? When do they start?
  • The Shrinker-UOJ Stormtroopers Think the Ichabod Readers Are Mindless Fools.
    Tim Glende Puts His Foot in It, Again



    Glenda's anonymous comment on his anonymous blog:

    There's no difference. The issue is this: do words have uniform grammatical meaning or are do they function differently in different contexts? In other words, Jackson's whole thing is that for him the word "justification" must always mean the same thing in every context. It means "to communicate forgiveness and to save." So, when people say "we believe in universal justification"- Jackson goes "aha! you believe in universal salvation." They respond and say "no, you've got us wrong. The word "justification" means in one context the act of forgiving by God (objective justification). And in another context it means the reception and communication of forgiveness through faith (subjective justification)." Jackson responds "no, the word means the same thing in every context. I don't care if you define it differently in the different contexts. I don't care if the people who came up with this distinction were using the word differently in different contexts. I say it means the same thing in every context and that meaning is the communication of forgiveness and salvation. So, whether you want to be or not, you're a universalist. And that's why you believe in the Church-growth movement! Ha, I'm smarter than you!" Then the people who follow him think "wow, how brilliant, he figure (sic) out what was wrong with all the synods. It's UOJ. He's got a Ph.D from Notre Dame. He must be smart. If I agree with him, I can be smart too!" And so his cult persists!

    ***

    GJ - Glenda is the victim of a poor educational system, designed to give passing grades to mediocre students. One of the WELS teachers wrote to me about how she had to give good grades to the children of WELS officials, no matter how poorly they performed. The teachers tell the children that their education is vastly superior to anything in Missouri.

    Glenda's excommunicated member has recorded in minute detail the bullying of the pastor. No one dare question him. He has 8 years of hard-drinking hard-studying behind him. He knows Greek! (Do not ask his bar friends classmates how much Greek.)

    I have simply said that if Glenda's members should be in awe of his MDiv from an unaccredited seminary, he should take off his shoes when addressing a genuine PhD, who also earned a degree at Yale, where his Uncle John Brug merely studied.

    There is no difference, Glenda claims, but he had to post again about no difference. That sounds like an argument to me. That is the classic tactic of the false teacher, to claim that his opinion is no different from the traditional view, while insisting on his view alone. He also lied when he claimed he was not plagiarizing Groeschel. Glenda has trouble with the facts, let alone the truth.

    Another tactic of the false teacher is to say, "This is your opinion." Glenda does not want to cite Luther, because he knows so little doctrine that he eagerly copies a clownish Mefodist. Now he must grapple with the Intrepids, who have come to similar conclusions on their own, in spite of having the same education as Glenda.

    I have often quoted this from a great Lutheran theologian, Henry E. Jacobs - that many times the layman has a better grasp of the Word of God than the pastor. The layman studies the Word without the filter of Uncle Fritz' essay lovingly placed in the Holy of Holies (WELS Essay Files), kept there even if Fritz is now an atheist.

    When the battle is joined, many pastors throw off their ennui and study the Word in a fresh light. The issue is not "how much education and where" but applying ourselves to the Word and the Confessions.

    I will take Luther, Chemnitz, and Melanchthon as greater authorities and better exegetes than Uncle Fritz. No wonder the Syn Conference sects pretend to have a quia subscription to the Book of Concord while plagiarizing Groeschel, Driscoll, and Stanley Junior. Uncle Fritz was an Enthusiast, so they see everything through the filter of Enthusiasm.

    Glenda should admit on his blog that Floyd Luther Stolzenburg led St. Paul, German Village (non-WELS at the time) into Church Growth, that Floyd had no business being a lay leader, let alone a pseuo-pastor and "evangelism consultant." Poor Tim was raised in a congregation and synod where right is wrong, and wrong is right.


    Tuesday, October 18, 2011

    Tim Glende's Anonymous Blog Hosts This Anonymous Person Code-Named Joel.
    Joel Says Joe Krohn Cannot Think for Himself






    Joel said...
    Actually, I put the whole unfortunate situation with Joe and his family at the feet of Greg Jackson. If Greg hadn't gotten Joe all hot an bothered about the UOJ "controversy" (truly the lamest, insignificant religious controversy that there has ever been in the whole history of Christendom), Joe wouldn't have entered into a pointless dispute with his home congregation. How many other lives will this man ruin?
    ***
    GJ - The first logical fallacy is calling Joe Krohn a mindless follower of Ichabod, but that ignores the fact that he was sympathetic with Church and Change. The anonymous comment is also a put-down of Joe Krohn, a common tactic in WELS and other Pietistic sects.
    Second, the author makes justification a non-argument, although he repeatedly posts about it.Exactly why has WELS been pounding UOJ since Richard Jungkuntz (died in ELCA) beat the drums for this precious doctrine. The entire UOJ Stormtrooper sorority imagines that the absolution of the world is the message of the Gospel. They never tire of assassinating anyone who disagrees with their fallacies, but they are unable to engage the issues.

    The brave guru, Joel by name, a leader of the Pharisees, claims that Joe and Lisa Krohn were excommunicated for NOTHING!!! I refuse to copy his earlier illiterate comment. With respect, here is his corrected version.

    Here is my comment with grammatical corrections:
    If the debate was between limited atonement (Calvinism) and universal atonement (Lutheran), it would be a big deal. The UOJ "debate" is between universal atonement (anti-UOJ) and universal justification (UOJ). There is not a warm bucket of spit's difference between those two sides since neither side says anyone gets into heaven unless they are brought to faith. Yes, this is a pointless debate and now Joe Krohn has had an upheaval in his family and church life over NOTHING!!!!!


    ---


    LutherRocks has left a new comment on your post "Tim Glende's Anonymous Blog Hosts This Anonymous P...":

    Tell it to Pastor Rydecki and the other 90+ Intrepid Lutherans... 

    More Proof That Lutherans in Large Groups Are Dumber Than Babtists and Big Love Mormons.
    The Synodical Sale of a Successful Campus Ministry Chapel


    "Sold!"
    University Lutheran Chapel To Be Sold:

    The students were planning a bake sale to help raise finds to aid ULC's survival. I talked to some people who were simply perplexed as to why the MNS would want to destroy their chapel and evict them from such a beautiful facility so well-designed for Lutheran worship and so readily accessible for students. In fact, I took a photo of the ULC sign which captured in the same shot the 'Welcome to the University of Minnesota" sign.  One block down the street from ULC  (a block nearer to the heart of campus) was a fairly new Mormon temple, and next to that was the Baptist student church.  I was simply stunned by the fact the Mormons and Baptists see the value of campus ministry in Minneapolis, with the Mormons making an investment in a student church while the LCMS abandons the one they have.

    Synodical Smokescreens Always Work the Same Way

    This is another touching vignette from
    The Sausage Factory, Mequon.


    The denominational spin-doctors need to learn some new tactics. Their old methods worked well when they controlled the magazines and the grapevines.

    But now, no one reads their insipid magazines, and anyone can search the web. Court cases are on the Net.

    Aww.  Synodical Whac-a-Mole was so much fun. Maybe they will bring it back, like Missile Command, so the drones can play it again.




    SP Schroeder needs to study psychology or read The Kidnapper's Law and Gospel. When he bans people from reading Ichabod, the forbidden fruit is that much more tempting. And word gets out - "I am not to read or even touch it - lest I die."

    Any college teacher knows that the best way to keep students from studying something is to make it required reading.

    ---

    rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Synodical Smokescreens Always Work the Same Way":

    This is a stellar example of how the synodical leadership is out of touch with many members. Prohibition rarely achieves its desired effect. We live in a culture where many have become less trusting and respectful of authority. Furthermore, we are admonished to be like the Bereans. That is why personal study of the Scriptures and the Confessions by the laity drives the UOJ fanatics even more stark raving mad. Many of them would rather have you eat the cotton candy Kelmed from the Enthusiasts. The effects of false doctrine are like a festering boil that needs to be lanced. Synodical leaders do the members a great disservice when they ask them to follow them blindly.

    Paul McCain's Expert on UOJ Gets His Answer


    Phase One of Jack Kilcrease -

    Dr. Jack Kilcrease has left a new comment on your post "Kansas City Bishop Is First To Be Charged Criminal...":

    "ELCA paid $40 million for covering up the abusive past of a man they were too happy to ordain."

    As a conservative Lutheran, I of course do not believe that we should cast stones at any one. In that you make a good point.

    But, seriously, I mean, where do you get this stuff? Do you have any actual evidence of this? I personally don't care much for the ELCA, but this claim about the 40 million dollars doesn't sound very credible to me. I will totally believe it if you can come up with evidence.

    Your response: Blah, blah, blah. You miss spelled (sic) a word. Blah, blah, you're secretly a Catholic. Blah, blah, UOJ is universalism. Blah.


    No need for a response then.

    Here is a lengthy response to Jack Kilcrease.

    It included the entire article from Saltzmann, a well known ELCA writer and editor.

    Phase Two of Jack Kilcrease -

    Jack Kilcrease had to keep it up. Why should he concede anything?

    Dr. Jack Kilcrease said... Where's the 40 million? I see that they sued for 300 million, but I don't see anything about paying out 40 million. Again, people sue for all sorts of absurd amounts, but paying out is another issue. That was what my question was about.

    BTW, I enjoyed my titles. I sent it to my parents and my wife, and they got a big kick out it. It reminds me of that movie "A Knight's Tale" where the Geoffrey Chaucer character has all these amusing titles he gives to Heath Ledger's character when he announces him "The protector of Grecian virginity!" "trained by the ELCA and working for the Anti-Christ, it's Jack Kilcrease!!!"

    Jack's approach--which always includes his title "Dr"--is simply to mock the facts, perhaps to cast doubts on everything published on this blog. He has tender toes about UOJ, his history with ELCA, and his velcro-like affinity for another lazy mocker, Paul McCain.

    Unfortunately for Kilcrease and McCain, their puerile responses only emphasize the truth. I do not make statements of fact unless they are supported with evidence, a habit they have not yet acquired. I said $40 million because I knew the story well and linked it at one time. I do not have the time to do Jack's homework for him, especially since he claims two doctorates in his marriage.

    So far, all the UOJ advocates encountered on this blog are allergic to the facts. So I will post more of the hideous details that Jack scoffed at twice. I never said Kilcrease was secretly a Catholic. His own profile at a Catholic school says he teaches for them. He is a Catholic employee, which is quite an accomplishment for someone whose father graduated from the Sausage Factory in Mequon.



    Bishop says he regrets minister's actions


    Posted: Saturday, April 24, 2004


    WICHITA FALLS - Lutheran Bishop Kevin S. Kanouse apologized Friday to victims of a former minister convicted of molesting boys, a day after his synod was hit with a nearly $37 million verdict in a sexual abuse lawsuit.

    Gerald Patrick Thomas Jr. is serving 397 years in prison; the abuse was at the center of Thursday's multimillion-dollar verdict.

    "We do express our regrets. We pledge to make sure people like Gerry Thomas never serve a church again," said Kanouse, who heads the Dallas-based Northern Texas-Northern Louisiana Synod.

    Jurors sided with nine alleged sex abuse victims who sued the synod, part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, claiming a former bishop and his assistant ignored warnings about Thomas.

    Earlier settlements involved the award of another $32 million. Church officials say the combined payout will be less than $69 million due to a complicated system of credits.
    Kanouse insisted church officials did not know Thomas preyed on children.
    "No one in the church knew he was a predator of children until he was arrested. Were there clues? Absolutely," he said.
    The bishop maintained the synod already has a system in place for preventing ministers like Thomas from entering church service.
    The verdict in the court case came a day before the synod began an annual three-day assembly in Wichita Falls.
    Kanouse denied that going to court instead of settling was an act of defiance toward the victims.
    "The bottom line is our insurance company thought it was worth taking it to trial," he said. "It was an act of trying to tell our story and see what the jury had to say. Well, the jury said we were liable and awarded against us."



    Former Marshall minister faces new charge


    Published: Monday, June 03, 2002


    LONGVIEW (AP) — A former Lutheran minister accused of sex crimes involving boys has been arrested on a new charge.
    Gerald Patrick Thomas Jr., the 40-year-old former minister of Marshall's Good Shepherd Lutheran Church, was held Friday night by Marshall police on a Harrison County District Court warrant for aggravated sexual assault, according to jail records.
    Thomas had been free on bond for three separate state charges of sex crimes. He was awaiting sentencing on a federal charge of possession of child pornography, said Marshall lawyer Don Stokes.
    The former pastor had admitted in federal court in Tyler that he allowed two teen-age boys to photograph themselves engaging in sex acts at his home.
    A civil lawsuit filed earlier this year claimed that Thomas molested eight boys over several years and that his actions should have been halted by church leaders. The lawsuit also named the Chicago-based Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and several other church-related organizations as defendants.
    Thomas resigned from the denomination's clergy roster about a year ago. He now lives with his sister in Ocala, Fla.



    Judge seals deal in Lutheran sex abuse scandal


    Published: Tuesday, April 13, 2004


    MARSHALL (AP) — A judge approved and sealed a settlement Monday involving the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and 14 alleged sex abuse victims who claim church officials ignored warnings about an errant minister who was later convicted of molesting boys.
    Several church agencies also were included in the deal, which Harrison County District Judge Bonnie Leggat sealed pending the outcome of a civil trial against the remaining defendant — the denomination's Northern Texas-Northern Louisiana Synod. Testimony is scheduled to start today.
    The case of former Lutheran pastor Gerald Patrick Thomas Jr., who was sentenced last year to 397 years in state prison for sexually assaulting boys in this East Texas town, has drawn parallels from victims' advocates to some of the worst cases in the Roman Catholic abuse crisis.
    Details of the pact will become public after the trial is over, he said.
    Jennifer Ainsworth, attorney for the 5 million-member ELCA, said the denomination was pleased.
    "We believe it's in the best interests of the ELCA and the kids," Ainsworth said. "We believe ELCA took responsibility for any involvement in this and the kids will be taken care of."
    The victims and their families accused Lutheran officials of ignoring questionable behavior by Thomas. Private, internal memos detailed allegations against Thomas before his assignment to Good Shepherd Lutheran Church in Marshall in 1997.
    Church officials, meanwhile, have repeatedly denied negligence.
    Under the settlement, all money paid out will be put into trust funds for the victims; it won't be controlled by parents or guardians, attorneys said.
    A jury of eight men and four women was selected last week before the settlement was confirmed.
    Parents and guardians of most victims appeared before the judge to confirm they were satisfied with the settlement terms. In questioning of the victims' relatives Monday, the plaintiffs' lead attorney, Edward Hohn, characterized the settling defendants as "peripheral" and called the synod the "target" defendant in the case.
    While allegedly aware of Thomas' "boundary issues" in seminary, the local synod did not share details of Thomas' background with the Marshall congregation later that year, court documents say. Court papers also claim that the church official in charge of pastor assignments at the time had himself been arrested twice for indecent exposure.
    Thomas, 41, was charged in 2001 after a teenager found nude images of friends on the pastor's computer and tried to blackmail him.
    Convicted on federal child pornography charges, Thomas is serving five years at the U.S. Penitentiary in Beaumont. His state sentence will start after that.
    ***

    Originally, I said - 








    ---

    Steven Goodrich has left a new comment on your post "Always Glad To Answer Jack Kilcrease, Son of WELS ...":

    After doing some more research, here's the breakdown of who paid what.

    Prior to the civil trial in April, several defendants settled with the plaintiffs: Good Shepherd ($750,000); the ELCA church wide organization ($8 million); the Michigan candidacy committee that approved Thomas for ordination ($1.2 million); and Trinity Seminary ($22 million).

    Nine of the 14 plaintiffs continued their suit against the Northern Texas-Northern Louisiana Synod; its former bishop, Mark Herbener; and his assistant, Earl Eliason. On April 22, the jury awarded $36.8 million to the plaintiffs, assigning liability for the abuse at 35 percent for Eliason, 23 percent for Thomas, 20 percent for Herbener, 20 percent for Trinity, and 2 percent for the candidacy committee. The ELCA wasn't assigned a percentage of liability. The percentage allocation confused defendants and their lawyers since Trinity had already settled and was no longer involved in the case.

    Here is a link to the story in the Lutheran, but you need a subscription to read the entire thing.

    http://www.thelutheran.org/article/article.cfm?article_id=2390 

    Steven Goodrich has left a new comment on your post "Always Glad To Answer Jack Kilcrease, Son of WELS ...":

    Here's you a link, Jack.

    http://amarillo.com/stories/042404/tex_regretact.shtml