ICHABOD, THE GLORY HAS DEPARTED - explores the Age of Apostasy, predicted in 2 Thessalonians 2:3, to attack Objective Faithless Justification, Church Growth Clowns, and their ringmasters. The antidote to these poisons is trusting the efficacious Word in the Means of Grace. John 16:8. Isaiah 55:8ff. Romans 10. Most readers are WELS, LCMS, ELS, or ELCA. This blog also covers the Roman Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodoxy, and the Left-wing, National Council of Churches denominations.
Martin Luther Sermons
Bethany Lutheran Hymnal Blog
Bethany Lutheran Church P.O. Box 6561 Springdale AR 72766 Reformation Seminary Lectures USA, Canada, Australia, Philippines 10 AM Central - Sunday Service
We use The Lutheran Hymnal and the King James Version
Luther's Sermons: Lenker Edition
Click here for all previous YouTube Videos
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Gottesdienst Online: Memo to Synod: Mind Your Own Business
Gottesdienst Online: Memo to Synod: Mind Your Own Business: "Naiveté can get one into trouble. I should have smelled something fishy when I received a request from the LCMS International Center to have my parish participate in a “Perceptions of Ministry Inventory,” a survey designed “to enhance the formation and professional development of parish pastors”; had I been paying closer attention, I might have wondered why the Board for Pastoral Education and the Council of Presidents wanted to assure me that my “privacy and anonymity will be preserved throughout the process.”"
'via Blog this'
***
GJ - WELS did something like this. A circuit pastor was furious about this and wrote a letter.
Soon he was out of the ministry.
Read the article and ask where millions of dollars go. In fact, you will stop asking.
Anglican Church in North America (ACNA)/LCMS Talks
Anglican Church in North America (ACNA)/LCMS Talks: "Seminary to Host Anglican Church in North America and The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod Third Semiannual Dialogue
FORT WAYNE, IN (CTS)—Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne,
Indiana will be the site for the third installment of dialogue between
the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA) and The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS), October 27–28. The focus for this
meeting will be "Contemporary Issues Facing the Church in North
America.""
'via Blog this'
Church—Missouri Synod Third Semiannual Dialogue
FORT WAYNE, IN (CTS)—Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne,
Indiana will be the site for the third installment of dialogue between
the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA) and The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS), October 27–28. The focus for this
meeting will be "Contemporary Issues Facing the Church in North
America.""
'via Blog this'
The American Spectator : The Greatest Book in the English Language
The American Spectator : The Greatest Book in the English Language:
'via Blog this'
The King James Version (KJV) was born out of political compromise and royal patronage. Church life in 16th-century England was characterized by high and often violent tensions over vernacular translations of the ancient Latin version of the Bible known as the vulgate. Early translators such as William Tyndale and John Rogers were burned at the stake. When the Reformation gathered momentum after Queen Elizabeth came to the throne in 1558, the Puritans popularized the Geneva Bible, which went through 70 editions selling more than half a million copies. But when James succeeded Elizabeth, the new and scholarly king (called "the wisest fool in Christendom") identified footnotes in the Geneva Bible that he deemed to be subversive of royal authority.
At Hampton Court Palace in 1604, King James moved to end this subversion by convening a conference of established church bishops and moderate political Puritans. Keeping the latter on his side was one of James's priorities, although he was theologically opposed to their low church governance, as he showed by his comment, "No bishops, no King." Nevertheless James commissioned six committees drawn from both Puritan and Episcopalian scholars to translate a new English language version of the Bible dedicated to himself as "the principal mover and author" of the translation. So the KJV was conceived as a unifying production, endorsing the idea of a monarchical national church.
Do Not Go Gentle into that Good Night, LCMS:
You Are Worse Than ELCA, Because You Work with ELCA
AND Kick People Out of Church
Narrow-minded Lutheran has left a new comment on your post "More Proof That Lutherans in Large Groups Are Dumb...":
Nice job, Minn. South. Enjoy your $3.2-million while Missouri runs around and bad-mouths ELCA and ECUSA for kicking parishioners out of their churches.
***
GJ - I was thinking today - Concordia Publishing House has $26 million in the bank from their hymnal sales. (Remember someone scoffing about my claim that new hymnals are like minting money? It is.) CPH could have bought the building and leased it back to the campus ministry. Many different agencies could have done that. It would be hard to lose out, since the location alone made it valuable.
But readers, this is why all the Lutheran sects love to close congregations. They make the congregation pay for the mission building and land, even if the mission board did a horrible job of picking the land, the location, and the building. The members pay and pay. When the sect forecloses, the sect keeps all the money. Sometimes they let the congregation vote on which entity gets how much money.
At one point the closing of parishes was keeping many LCA districts in the black. In other words, they could pay outrageous staff salaries because they were spending the equity gained from the congregations trying to pay for their white elephants for 20 years and finally giving up.
The LCA in Michigan built an underground (earth-sheltered) building, which cost a lot of money but used very little energy. The community laughed at it and called it Holy Moley.
Wally Oelhaven's mission committee got some good land, allowed a zoning restriction on it, and erected one of the strangest and ugliest WEFs ever - and the competition was stiff. Shepherd of Peace. They moved and knocked the WEF down. The bulldozer took one jab at it and poof, down it went.
All the Lutheran groups waste millions of dollars, calling it reaching out with the Gospel. The leaders know how much each pastor makes, but no one dares to ask what the SP makes in salary and benefits.
Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Justification
Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Justification:
'via Blog this'
145 In What, Then, Does Justification of Man the Sinner Before God Consist According to the Statement of the Gospel?
- In this very thing, that God imputes to us the righteousness of the obedience and death of Christ the Mediator and thus justifies us freely out of grace, without our works or merits, alone by faith that apprehends the grace of God the Father and the merit of Christ; that is, He forgives us [our] sins, receives [us] into grace, adopts [us] as [His] sons, and receives [us] to the inheritance of life eternal. Ro 4:24–25, 28; 4:5; 10:4; Gal 3:24; Eph 2:8–9; Titus 3:5–7.
Labels:
Chemnitz,
Justification by Faith
False Teachers Mislead the Students at Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary:
Forest Bivens on Forgiveness without Faith
AC V has left a new comment on your post "WELS Meditations Agrees with ELCA: Everyone Is Alr...":
WELS Q&A
Hello, A Baptist friend of mine is having trouble with pastors forgiving a congregation's sins. Could you please explain to me what gives pastors or others the right to forgive sins. I see James 5:16 and John 20:23. Still kind of confused. Thank you.
The Bible verses you mention are appropriate. It may also be said that all passages that invite and urge us to preach the gospel are also rightly mentioned. To preach the gospel is to proclaim the forgiveness of sins for the sake of Christ and his atoning work. No one will really understand what the Lutheran church teaches about "absolution" (declaring forgiveness of sins) unless he clearly understands the truth of objective or universal justification. That is at the very heart of what we believe and teach. Long ago God has already forgiven every human being his or her sins. Christ's life and death as our substitute is finished. Nothing more needs to be done by the sinner himself. A Christian can go to any person on earth and rightly say to him, "Your sins are forgiven." To put it another way: The forgiveness of sins is not a potential fact that becomes a reality only when sinners do something to qualify for it, or even when the gospel is proclaimed and personally received through faith. It has long been a reality to be proclaimed to sinners without conditions.
When Jesus Christ rose from the dead-2000 years ago, he was raised because of our justification-because we had already been justified (Romans 4:25). 2 Corinthians 5:19-21 and Romans 3:22-23 stress the same truth.
This is why we may speak to one another to say "Your sins are forgiven" or "In the name of God, I forgive your sins." This is why a pastor, acting on behalf of all the Christians in the assembly, says the same thing. This is not arrogance or trying to "play God." It is serving as God's ambassadors and messengers, which is what we are. Perhaps your Baptist friend is thinking, "This should not be done in a large group, since there may be people who are really not repentant or who are hypocrites in that church. You cannot tell them they are forgiven, can you?" We answer in this way: "Yes, we can and must say this, for God has invited and commanded us to do so. Jesus died and took away their sins, reconciling them to him - whether they believe it or not."
Lest we be misunderstood, we also say that if we know someone to be impenitent or a hypocrite, we will first speak to that person about sin, God's wrath, and eternal damnation in hell to expose his sinfulness and allow the Holy Spirit to convict him. That is also why the absolution in our public assemblies is always preceded by a general confession of sins and expression of repentance. But the fact remains-From God's standpoint Christ died for them and took away their guilt. We tell people this whether they are believers or unbelievers. And we hope and pray that this time they will believe us so that they too will know it is true and rejoice with us in the amazing grace of God.
- F. Bivens, Archived in Forgiveness and Repentance Section.
F. Bivens, Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary |
OK, so what would the Book of Concord say?:
"Let any one of the adversaries come forth and tell us when remission of sins takes place. O good God, what darkness there is! ... what does the power of the keys effect, if sins have been already remitted? Here, indeed, they also labor much more, and wickedly detract from the power of the keys." - Augsburg Confession, Apology; Article XII. Of Repentance
AC V has left a new comment on your post "False Teachers Mislead the Students at Wisconsin L...":
More Bivens:
"The Lutheran Confessions clearly speak of objective or universal justification and the imputation or forgiveness of all people prior to and aside from justifying faith (e.g., FC, Ep, III, 4,7,9; Apol., IV, 103).
But the Confessions also use terms or phrases that if torn from the context of the rest of the Confessions, could be understood to say that justification is more of a potential reality without faith (e.g., "God wants to justify," Apol. IV, 69, 180, 292; "If we believe," e.g., FC, SD, III, 13; Apol IV, 238, 296; Apol XIII, 8; "When we believe," e.g., Apol. IV, 222, 382; FC, SD, XI, 38).
Lutherans who seem to spend more time quoting the Lutheran Confessions than they do the Scriptures (AC V - What? Please explain! It's a bad thing to quote the Confessions?) have been known to pit subjective justification against objective justification and try to use the Confessions as their ally."
- "Getting The Right Message Out –
And Getting It Out The Right Way
With Special Emphasis on Public Worship and Classroom Instruction" p. 3
Wow. Typical UOJ Stormtrooper.
***
GJ - Bivens bragged about going to Fuller Seminary while gathered with the entire Midland circuit pastors, include the future DP John Seifert. That was in Seifert's driveway. Nevertheless, he told a seminarian, "I don't know where Jackson gets the idea that I went to Fuller."
WELS pastors lied so often that I began writing down their quotations in my Day-Timer, to read back to them.
Labels:
Forest Bivens,
UOJ,
WELS
WELS Stewardship Means: "What's In It for Me?"
A commission on "Christian" fund-raising is considered unethical. But Jeff is a Church and Changer, like Kudu Don Patterson. |
rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Tim Glende's Anonymous Blog Hosts This Anonymous P...":
The use of Cornerstone was all the reason I needed as to why I finally left my former WELS congregation. When I read the name Jeff Davis in the council report section of the monthly newsletter, I was sure that none of my efforts would convince the congregational leadership that were going down the wrong path. When I called the congregation president, he acknowledged that Davis would be getting a commission. But, it was only 3% to 5% of the money raised through the capital appeal process. Furthermore, that commission had a cap on it. I was assured that I could find out what the cap is, but that information was never divulged.
When another congregation wanted to take on an expansion, they asked Cornerstone first. The pastor told what one of the lay leaders said, "I feel like we are being extorted". What would be against the law in the secular realm seems to be a normal mode of operation within some circles in the WELS.
rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "WELS Tetzels Are on the Pastoral Call List":
That every member visitation may have been the content of the letter that I recently received. Since I noticed the return address of the Love Shack, I threw it in the trash without reading it. Back in the 90's, the WELS synodical leadership was bellaching about a perceived shortage of pastors. Even back then, there was at least one planned giving counselor, who was an ordained pastor, in each of the twelve districts. The irony struck me as odd. It looks like the WELS leadership is setting up a roadblock. All of the WELS travelers will be shaken down by the highwaymen if they want to pass through.
***
GJ -
Code of Ethics
FRCI adheres to the standards of practice and code of ethics, as outlined by the Giving Institute (formerly the American Association of Fund Raising Counsel--AAFRC).
Standards of Practice
FRCI provides service to non-profit organizations that serve the public’s best interest.
FRCI engages clients that represent the broadest interests of society such as: religious, educational, health care, human service, arts, cultural, humanitarian, environmental, international, and other organizations benefiting humankind.
FRCI offers services which advance the goals of a client and which directly relate to philanthropy, such as studies, campaign management, annual development programs, planned giving, strategic planning, direct mail, telemarketing, management services, executive search, public relations, marketing and communications, software developers, organization development/management, prospect research, and training. FRCI and its principals participate in the philanthropic community.
Professional Code of Ethics
FRCI believes it is in the best interest of our clients that:
- Initial meetings with prospective clients should not be construed as services for which payment is expected.
- No payments of special consideration should be made to an officer, director, trustee, employee, or advisor of a not-for-profit organization as compensation for influencing the selection of fundraising counsel.
- No payments of special consideration should be made to an officer, director, trustee, employee, or advisor of a not-for-profit organization as compensation for influencing the selection of fundraising counsel.
- Fees should be mutually agreed upon in advance of services.
- A flat, fixed fee is charged based on the level and extent of professional services provided. Fees are not based on the amount of charitable income raised or expected to be raised.
- Contracts providing for a contingent fee, a commission, or a fee based on percentage of funds raised are prohibited. Such contracts are harmful to the relationship between the donor and the institution and detrimental to the financial health of the client organization.
- Fundraising expenditures are within the authority and control of the not-for-profit organization.
- FRCI feels it is in the best interest of clients that solicitation of gifts is undertaken by Board members, staff and other volunteers.
- Subsequent to analysis or study, FRCI should engage a client only when the best interest of the client is served.
- FRCI should not profit directly or indirectly from materials provided by others, but billed to the FRCI, without disclosure to the client.
- FRCI does not engage in methods that are misleading to the public or harmful to their clients; do not make exaggerated claims of past achievement; and do not guarantee results of promise to helps clients achieve goals.
- Any potential conflict of interest should be disclosed by the firm to clients and prospective clients.
- FRCI will not acquire or maintain custody of funds and/or gifts directed to client organization.
---
LutherRocks
has left a new comment on your post "WELS
Stewardship Means: "What's In It for Me?"":
It was Cornerstone that was the last straw for us. We could not give the blessings of our money to a church that was willing to take part of our first fruits and give it to an organization to do the work the pastor (and Elders)should have been doing all along; and I brought that to their attention. Patterson had time for writing a book, contributing/presenting writings/papers for this and that, workshops, retreats etc...ad nauseum. I didn't see the difference between what Cornerstone was doing and the money changers in the temple. It is all moving towards the fulfillment of Revelation anyway.
It was Cornerstone that was the last straw for us. We could not give the blessings of our money to a church that was willing to take part of our first fruits and give it to an organization to do the work the pastor (and Elders)should have been doing all along; and I brought that to their attention. Patterson had time for writing a book, contributing/presenting writings/papers for this and that, workshops, retreats etc...ad nauseum. I didn't see the difference between what Cornerstone was doing and the money changers in the temple. It is all moving towards the fulfillment of Revelation anyway.
The church is adopting from secular culture
more and more and will soon look no different than the state...the beast...all
in the name of the 'business of saving souls'. Ultimately we were booted over a
doctrinal issue but it all ties together eventually. Guys who push the warped
view of justification enable this kind of stuff to invade Christ's church. By
teaching universal absolution it begets upside down evangelism and then all bets
are off and anything goes. Call me a Jackson parrot. I don't care. I have seen
it first hand and speak from experience. I have come back from the dark side.
When Doebler told the praise band that Christ the Rock's growth was being
inhibited by the band's performance...well need I say it was a wake up call of
Biblical proportions?
WELS Tetzels Are on the Pastoral Call List
Caulk, Mr Vernon L - Ministry of Christia - Milwaukee WI 10/10/2011 Christian Giving Counselor, AZ-CA and SC Districts
Hillmann, Mr Ron - Ministry of Christia - Milwaukee WI 10/10/2011 Christian Giving Counselor, SEW District
***
GJ - According to the Berg brothers, the WELS Giving Counselors get a commission on their sales. "It is in their contract. I have seen it."
Some good questions to ask the Tetzels are:
SP Schroeder writes that they are gearing up for an every member visitation across WELS. If that happens, it will be a miracle greater than the Crossing of the Red Sea. The pastors do not visit their own sick and shut-in members.
Oh wait. This is for money? When do they start?
The Shrinker-UOJ Stormtroopers Think the Ichabod Readers Are Mindless Fools.
Tim Glende Puts His Foot in It, Again
Glenda's anonymous comment on his anonymous blog:
There's no difference. The issue is this: do words have uniform grammatical meaning or are do they function differently in different contexts? In other words, Jackson's whole thing is that for him the word "justification" must always mean the same thing in every context. It means "to communicate forgiveness and to save." So, when people say "we believe in universal justification"- Jackson goes "aha! you believe in universal salvation." They respond and say "no, you've got us wrong. The word "justification" means in one context the act of forgiving by God (objective justification). And in another context it means the reception and communication of forgiveness through faith (subjective justification)." Jackson responds "no, the word means the same thing in every context. I don't care if you define it differently in the different contexts. I don't care if the people who came up with this distinction were using the word differently in different contexts. I say it means the same thing in every context and that meaning is the communication of forgiveness and salvation. So, whether you want to be or not, you're a universalist. And that's why you believe in the Church-growth movement! Ha, I'm smarter than you!" Then the people who follow him think "wow, how brilliant, he figure (sic) out what was wrong with all the synods. It's UOJ. He's got a Ph.D from Notre Dame. He must be smart. If I agree with him, I can be smart too!" And so his cult persists!
***
GJ - Glenda is the victim of a poor educational system, designed to give passing grades to mediocre students. One of the WELS teachers wrote to me about how she had to give good grades to the children of WELS officials, no matter how poorly they performed. The teachers tell the children that their education is vastly superior to anything in Missouri.
Glenda's excommunicated member has recorded in minute detail the bullying of the pastor. No one dare question him. He has 8 years of
I have simply said that if Glenda's members should be in awe of his MDiv from an unaccredited seminary, he should take off his shoes when addressing a genuine PhD, who also earned a degree at Yale, where his Uncle John Brug merely studied.
There is no difference, Glenda claims, but he had to post again about no difference. That sounds like an argument to me. That is the classic tactic of the false teacher, to claim that his opinion is no different from the traditional view, while insisting on his view alone. He also lied when he claimed he was not plagiarizing Groeschel. Glenda has trouble with the facts, let alone the truth.
Another tactic of the false teacher is to say, "This is your opinion." Glenda does not want to cite Luther, because he knows so little doctrine that he eagerly copies a clownish Mefodist. Now he must grapple with the Intrepids, who have come to similar conclusions on their own, in spite of having the same education as Glenda.
I have often quoted this from a great Lutheran theologian, Henry E. Jacobs - that many times the layman has a better grasp of the Word of God than the pastor. The layman studies the Word without the filter of Uncle Fritz' essay lovingly placed in the Holy of Holies (WELS Essay Files), kept there even if Fritz is now an atheist.
When the battle is joined, many pastors throw off their ennui and study the Word in a fresh light. The issue is not "how much education and where" but applying ourselves to the Word and the Confessions.
I will take Luther, Chemnitz, and Melanchthon as greater authorities and better exegetes than Uncle Fritz. No wonder the Syn Conference sects pretend to have a quia subscription to the Book of Concord while plagiarizing Groeschel, Driscoll, and Stanley Junior. Uncle Fritz was an Enthusiast, so they see everything through the filter of Enthusiasm.
Glenda should admit on his blog that Floyd Luther Stolzenburg led St. Paul, German Village (non-WELS at the time) into Church Growth, that Floyd had no business being a lay leader, let alone a pseuo-pastor and "evangelism consultant." Poor Tim was raised in a congregation and synod where right is wrong, and wrong is right.
Labels:
Tim Glende,
UOJ
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)