Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Luther - SynConference Leaders Are False, Uncertain, Evil, Blasphemous, Accursed, and Demonic



AC V has left a new comment on your post "McCain Stumbles Over Luther's Doctrine of Faith. B...":

And now a word from our sponsor:

“Therefore my doctrine is true, pure, sure, and divine. Nor can there be any doctrine that is different from mine, much less better. Therefore any doctrine at all that does not teach as mine does—that all men are sinners and are justified solely by faith in Christ—must be false, uncertain, evil, blasphemous, accursed, and demonic. And so are those who either teach or accept such a doctrine” - Martin Luther (Luther’s Works: Vol. 26, p.59).

Lutheran or Not? WELS Needs To Make a Decision



solafide (http://solafide.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Gunslinger Shoots Himself in the Foot...Again":

It is time for the WELS to decide to be Lutheran and accept the doctrine of justification by faith alone or to quit being Lutheran (which would mean they no longer subscribe to the Book of Concord) and the synod should be dissolved. To deny justification by faith is to deny the Gospel.

Narrow-Minded Addresses the Tunnel-Vision UOJ Stylists


Narrow-minded Lutheran has left a new comment on your post "Gunslinger Shoots Himself in the Foot...Again":

Since I am not popular on Steadfast Waltherans, because I had the audacity to question the LCMS being with fellowship with the ELCK (LWF member), I will ask this question here:

Let's set up the scenario that after drawing your last breath, you are asked why you should be let into Heaven. The UOJ-ers will accuse the JBFA-ers of answering, "Because I have faith in my faith (paraphrasing from Steadfast Waltherans). This is absolutely silly and distorts JBFA. The proper response should be, "Because the Holy Ghost gave me (note passive) the faith that Christ atoned for my sins at the cross and gave me victory over death in His Resurrection, through His Means of Grace" This ain't rocket science, folks.

Will the UOJ response to the question be, "Because Christ made everyone righteous at the cross?" Even Satan believes in the historical fact of Calvary. Does this justify him?

This mantra of labeling JBFA-ers as Arminian is deceptive. We don't at all believe we cooperate in our salvation. Actually, Pope Walther in his Easter sermon was the Arminian in saying all that's left for one to do is accept what Christ did, like he's selling a used car. Note the decision.

While BOC uses the word "accept" many times, it is in no way in the context of it being a decision of our freewill. It is passive. This reminds me of the whipping boy Rydecki's "Theses Opposed to Huberianism," when the former Calvinist, Huber, accused the orthodox Lutherans of Calvinism when they didn't agree with him.

Lastly, the sole proprietors of the Eighth Commandment are showing some fine manners in their rude treatment of Pastor Rydecki.

***

GJ - I do not like using the term accept because it does not translate the Greek word adequately. Accept suggests making a decision. JP Meyer and others use that concept with their UOJ - "Here is the historical fact. Christ has absolved the world. Now make a decision. Accept or decline." That Arminian language comes right from Walther's Easter absolution sermon.

Make a decision - accept the general absolution of the world.
This is not faith in Christ's atonement, but trust in UOJ dogma.

Brett Meyer Has the Earlier Robert Preus Paper:
Robert Preus Supporting Justification by Faith, Not UOJ





The Robert Preus paper was published at Ft. Wayne, sold at Bethany Lutheran College, many years before Justification and Rome was published, using the same quotations.

Rolf Preus' claim--his father always taught UOJ--is defeated by the essay and the book he edited.

---

AC V has left a new comment on your post "The SynConference Teaches the Assumption of Walthe...":

In his "Justification and Rome" Robert Preus was able to define and talk about the doctrine of justification without using the terms "Objective Justification" and "Subjective Justification." How refreshing! Read it. Get it:

http://www.amazon.com/Justification-Rome-Robert-D-Preus/dp/057004264X

McCain Stumbles Over Luther's Doctrine of Faith.
Brett Meyer and AC V Answer

Except the Dietrich catechism, which Missouri adopted,
the KJV catechism still being sold by CPH, the original Gausewitz catechism
for the whole Synodical Conference, etc.

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Gunslinger Shoots Himself in the Foot...Again":

WELS Siegbert W. Becker
"Faith does nothing more than accept the forgiveness proclaimed in the Gospel. It is not a condition we must fulfill before we can be forgiven. It is not a cause of forgiveness on account of which God forgives us. The forgiveness comes first. Faith is merely the response to the message. God says to us, “Your sins are forgiven.” This is objective justification, and God’s message to us is true whether we believe it or not. Faith makes God’s message its own and says, “My sins are forgiven.” This is subjective justification. The whole doctrine is just as simple as that." Page 12, The Place of Faith
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/BeckerJustification.PDF



WELS AZ/CA DP Pastor Jon Buchholz
"Faith doesn’t bring anything into existence that doesn’t already exist. Faith doesn’t cause something to happen. Faith simply grasps— trusts—something that already is in place." Page 14
http://archive.wels.net/cgi-bin/site.pl?2617&collectionID=1161&contentID=76707&shortcutID=26388



WELS Our Great Heritage states,
"And yet many Lutherans still labor under the delusion that God does not forgive us unless we believe. Instead of seeing faith as nothing more than the spiritual hand with which we make the forgiveness of God our own, they see it as a reason why God forgives us. They believe that Christ has indeed provided forgiveness for all men, that God is willing to forgive them, but before he really forgives he first of all demands that we should be sorry for our sins and that we should have faith. Just have faith they say, and then God will forgive you. All the right words are there. The only thing wrong is that the words are in the wrong order. God does not forgive us IF we have faith. He has forgiven us long ago when he raised his Son from the dead." (p. 59)"



WELS MLC President Mark Zarling, "Faith does nothing more than receive the forgiveness which is offered in the Gospel. It is not a condition we fulfill nor is it a cause of forgiveness. We are already forgiven. God's message of justification in Christ is there whether we believe it or not. Faith then receives the blessings." And, "Faith that accepts the good news of universal justification is the work of God the Holy Ghost." Page 7
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/ZarlingJustification.pdf



Question to those who boldly confess the doctrine of Universal Objective Justification (UOJ). Your doctrine of Objective Justification (OJ) teaches that by the Atonement of Christ the whole world, including every unbeliever, has been declared forgiven of all sin, justified, declared righteous by God's divine verdict and God is at peace with them. OJ also teaches that justification is not a change in man but a change in the relationship between God and man. Also in UOJ's teaching concerning Subjective Justification (SJ) faith is simply and empty hand accepting what was already declared to be true. That faith doesn't do anything or bring about anything, it only receives. Then when does the conversion of man take place and he becomes as a little child, Matt 18:2-3 (clearly a change in man)? When is a man born of water and the Spirit as Christ declares in John 3:3-6? When does a man cease to be carnally minded in the old man and become spiritually minded in the new man in Christ, Col. 3:9-10, Romans 8:6 and Eph. 4:22-24(clearly changes wrought by God in man through faith worked by the Means of Grace)? How can man be a new creature in Christ through the changes noted above if in UOJ there is no change in man, if faith doesn't affect a change in man, 2 Cor. 5:17?








The Lutheran Confessions contend against the the Satanic apostasy of UOJ throughout and especially here:
Also, 71]
"but we maintain this, that properly and truly, by faith itself, we are for Christ's sake accounted righteous, or are acceptable to God. And because "to be justified" means that out of unjust men just men are made, or born again, it means also that they are pronounced or accounted just. For Scripture speaks in both ways. [The term "to be justified" is used in two ways: to denote, being converted or regenerated; again, being accounted righteous. Accordingly we wish first to show this, that faith alone makes of an unjust, a just man, i.e., receives remission of sins".
http://www.bookofconcord.org/defense_4_justification.php



The Lutheran Book of Concord rejects and condemns UOJ’s confession of faith, "Faith does not justify a believer." And, "Faith in and of itself does nothing." And establishes it’s clear confession that sins are not forgiven prior to the Holy Spirit working solely through the divinely instituted Means of Grace – Word and Sacrament.
BOC: 6] Let any one of the adversaries come forth and tell us when remission of sins takes place. O good God, what darkness there is! They doubt whether it is in attrition or in contrition that remission of sins occurs. And if it occurs on account of contrition, what need is there of absolution, what does the power of the keys effect, if sins have been already remitted?…"
http://www.bookofconcord.org/defense_10_repentance.php

Luther foretold of the current persecution of the Holy Spirit’s faith by today’s Lutheran Synods, churches, clergy and schools.
12. As before said, they regard faith of slight importance; for they do not understand that it is our sole justifier. To accept as true the record of Christ--this they call faith. The devils have the same sort of faith, but it does not make them godly. Such belief is not Christian faith; no, it is rather deception. 15. ...You see how they make faith of no value to themselves, and so must regard as heresy all doctrine based upon it. Thus they do away with the whole Gospel. These are they who deny the Christian faith and exterminate it from the world. Paul prophesied concerning them when he said (1 Tim 4, 1): "In later times some shall fall away from the faith." The voice of faith is now silenced all over the world. Indeed, faith is condemned and banished as the worst heresy, and all who teach and endorse it are condemned with it. The Pope, the bishops, charitable institutions, cloisters, high schools, unanimously opposed it for nearly four hundred years, and simply drove the world violently into hell. Their conduct is the real persecution by Antichrist, in the last times. 22. Now, the Cain-like saints have not, as they themselves confess, the Christian faith which would assure them of being the children of God. 29. You cannot extricate yourself from unbelief, nor can the Law do it for you. All your works in intended fulfilment of the Law must remain works of the Law and powerless to justify in the sight of God, who regards as just only believing children. 37. Note, Paul everywhere teaches justification, not by works, but solely by faith; and not as a process, but instantaneous. The testament includes in itself everything--justification, salvation, the inheritance and great blessing. Through faith it is instantaneously enjoyed, not in part, but all. Truly is it plain, then, that faith alone affords such blessings of God, justification and salvation-- immediately and not in process as must be the case with works 74. But what is the process whereby Christ gives us such a spirit and redeems us from under the Law? The work is effected solely by faith. He who believes that Christ came to redeem us, and that he has accomplished it, is really redeemed. As he believes, so is it with him. Faith carries with it the child-making spirit. The apostle here explains by saying that Christ has redeemed us from under the Law that we might receive the adoption of sons. As before stated, all must be effected through faith. Now we have discussed the five points of the verse.
http://www.trinitylutheranms.org/MartinLuther/MLSermons/Galatians4_1_7.html

---



AC V has left a new comment on your post "Gunslinger Shoots Himself in the Foot...Again":

P.T. McCain: "We never want to give anyone even the remotest impression that they should put faith in their faith, or trust in their trust."

Yet that is EXACTLY what "Objective Justification" does. Here's how:

If I have the EXACT SAME justification as the unbeliever, the only difference being that I have faith, then how can I be sure that my justification is going to work? Don't I have to put FAITH IN MY FAITH, TRUST IN MY TRUST?

Let's review: According to the Confessions the definition of justification is (and remember, folks, this is supposed to apply to UNBELIEVERS, too, according to UOJ):

“Accordingly, the word justify here means to declare righteous and free from sins, and to absolve one from eternal punishment for the sake of Christ's righteousness, which is imputed by God to faith, Phil. 3:9. For this use and understanding of this word is common in the Holy Scriptures of the Old and the New Testament” (SD III:17).

Too bad "faith" shows up in there....

...As it does time and time again in the Scriptures and the Confessions when talking about the doctrine of justification. You just shouldn't have a definition of justification - if you are a Lutheran - without the word "by faith" coming out in the same breath.




The SynConference Teaches the Assumption of Walther.
He Was Conceived without Actual Sin,
Assumed into Heaven



AC V has left a new comment on your post "Gunslinger Shoots Himself in the Foot...Again":

P.T. McCain: "We never want to give anyone even the remotest impression that they should put faith in their faith, or trust in their trust."

Yet that is EXACTLY what "Objective Justification" does. Here's how:

If I have the EXACT SAME justification as the unbeliever, the only difference being that I have faith, then how can I be sure that my justification is going to work? Don't I have to put FAITH IN MY FAITH, TRUST IN MY TRUST?

Let's review: According to the Confessions the definition of justification is (and remember, folks, this is supposed to apply to UNBELIEVERS, too, according to UOJ):

“Accordingly, the word justify here means to declare righteous and free from sins, and to absolve one from eternal punishment for the sake of Christ's righteousness, which is imputed by God to faith, Phil. 3:9. For this use and understanding of this word is common in the Holy Scriptures of the Old and the New Testament” (SD III:17).

Too bad "faith" shows up in there....

...As it does time and time again in the Scriptures and the Confessions when talking about the doctrine of justification. You just shouldn't have a definition of justification - if you are a Lutheran - without the word "by faith" coming out in the same breath.

 

Gunslinger Shoots Himself in the Foot...Again




Paul McCain on Steadfast Lutherans:
These are gravely serious matters we are talking about and there is nothing wrong in highlighting concerns, and frankly, making sure we are proclaiming an absolutely clear, free, unconditional and unqualified Gospel.

Those who question, deny, or cloud the concept of objective justification are doing nothing less than making the Gospel unclear, at best, and at worst, denying the Gospel.

Pr. Rydecki is NOT denying the Gospel, but I sincerely believe by making faith “the thing” when preaching on this text is doing a disservice both to the text and to the proclamation of the Gospel, for reasons previously indicated.

We never want to give anyone even the remotest impression that they should put faith in their faith, or trust in their trust.

Better to preach always about the objective reality on which faith rests: the objective absolution, forgiveness and justification of the whole world, as St. Paul teaches it consistently.





Bill and Ted's Excellent Smoke and Mirrors,
Versus Luther's Doctrine of Faith


Paul Wendland will substitute for Bill and Ted
in this excellent adventure of smoke and mirrors.

Beginning Sept. 12, Rev. Paul Wendland, president of Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary, will be leading an online, interactive Bible study of Romans 1-8. Titled "Justified by faith alone," this six-week study will be streamed live so congregations can hear and view Wendland as well as interact with him and ask him questions about the study.
WELS Commission on Adult Discipleship began offering these online studies in November 2011. Part of the Interactive Faith series, the studies allow congregations across the synod to join together in participating in the same Bible study—at the same time.
"If you could have an opportunity for your congregation to have an excellent study led by an excellent presenter, which would take very little work on your part, would you be interested?" asks Rev. Thomas Kock, pastor at Living Word, Johnson City, Tenn., and coordinator of the Interactive Faith series.
Many congregations have already answered, "Yes!" As many as 75 congregations have participated at one time during the studies that have taken place over the past year. Individuals are also participating in the studies from areas that are isolated from WELS churches, including places in the United States and around the world. Kock says that one woman from a major U.S. city was ecstatic that she could be part of a Bible study with other WELS members.
Wendland's study on Romans will be held Wednesdays at 7:30 p.m. and 9:30 p.m. Eastern Time. To join the study, you will need a high-speed Internet connection. For more details, visitwww.wels.net/adult-discipleship.

***

GJ - I have only heard Wendland once, at the recent WELS convention. The sect was only studying which translation to use to excommunicate members and pastors in the future. It was just a process, not a decision. However, Wendland was visibly peeved that the convention did not sound a loud Amen! to his favorite - the wretched New NIV from porn merchant Murdoch.

If Wendland actually  believes, teaches, and confesses justification by faith alone, then he should purge the Holy of Holies, the WELS Essay Files, of all those essays promoting justification without faith. UOJ is the only dogma taught by WELS, since that opinion renders everything else adiaphora.

This study is a good example of the UOJ Stormtroopers at work. 

  • First they obscure their true agenda, which is to teach universal absolution and salvation without faith
  • Second, they define justification by faith as Walther did - faith in their absurd, anti-Christian dogma of demi-semi-Universalism.
Thse EZ studies are not going over so well in WELS. They have had "as many as 75 congregations" participating at the same time. For a sect of 1000 congregations, that is not very many viewing at peak times. Perhaps they can urge congregations and pastors to switch off watching re-runs of the Packer games in favor of learning about what Luther never taught, what the Confessions never confessed, what the orthodox theologians never wrote.




---

solafide (http://solafide.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Bill and Ted's Excellent Smoke and Mirrors, Versus...":

"quercuscontramalum said...

I predict a train wreck."


So do I. It would probably be more beneficial for people to sit in the back of the class playing iPhone games, it certainly would be less damaging.


"If you could have an opportunity for your congregation to have an excellent study led by an excellent presenter, which would take very little work on your part, would you be interested?"

Very little work?!?! Since when is it a good idea to try and skate by on as "little work" as possible? I guess we know another pastor who uses sermons from SAB verbatim... I guess taking the time to actually conduct your own bible study takes away too much time from reading Ichabod and making sure that none of your members are posting on it.

***

GJ - False teachers get this angry and aggrieved look on their faces when selling their dogma as the truth.

---

California wrote:
RE: New WELS interactive on-line Bible study...the promotional rhetoric entices:   "If you could have an opportunity for your congregation to have an excellent study led by an excellent presenter, which would take very little work on your part, would you be interested?"   Assuming that offer was directed to called congregational pastors, the rhetoric is an implication that they are seen by synod elite as less than capable of leading an "excellent" study in an "excellent" fashion, by not agreeing they somehow will be depriving their respective congregations.   If they accept the offer, the implication will be admitting their perceived inadequacy, and lack of desire to expend more than a little energy to prepare.   If they refuse the offer, they will be considered less than a team player or self important obstructionist.   The wording of the "invitation" reveals a whole lot more about  the attitude of the place of clergy in the local congregation, than it does about an on-line Bible study.


---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Bill and Ted's Excellent Smoke and Mirrors, Versus...":

Ichabod -

I see this pacifying effort by Wisconsin Lutheran seminary president, Wendland, as a knee jerk reaction to some of the "flack" WELS is getting from the false teaching of universal objective justification.

I would not doubt in the least that their will be the Wendland dual teaching of "justification by faith" and also the universalism bent. The emphasis on justification by faith is designed only to offer lip service while WELS will continue on its merry way of teaching, preaching and promoting universal objective justification.

Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org

www.moralmatters.org