Friday, December 14, 2012

Children of the Heavenly Father

Jesus and the children - by Norma Boeckler.


http://www.semicolonblog.com/?p=5907

Garrison Keillor: “I once sang the bass line of Children of the Heavenly Father in a room with about three thousand Lutherans in it; and when we finished, we all had tears in our eyes, partly from the promise that God will not forsake us, partly from the proximity of all those lovely voices. By our joining in harmony, we somehow promise that we will not forsake each other.”
Children of the Heavenly Father
Safely in His bosom gather
Nestling bird nor star in heaven
Such a refuge e’er was given
God His own doth tend and nourish
In His holy courts they flourish
From all evil things He spares them
In His mighty arms He bears them
Neither life nor death shall ever
From the Lord His children sever
Unto them His grace He showeth
And their sorrows all He knoweth
Though He giveth or He taketh
God His children ne’er forsaketh
His the loving purpose solely
To preserve them pure and holy
Lo their very hairs He numbers
And no daily care encumbers
Them that share His ev’ry blessing
And His help in woes distressing
Praise the Lord in joyful numbers
Your Protector never slumbers
At the will of your Defender
Ev’ry foe man must surrender.
Lina Berg, as she was known to her friends, wrote and published hymn lyrics even as a child. She was a sickly child and of ten had to stay at home while the rest of her family attended the Lutheran church where her father was a pastor. When LIna was twenty-three, she accompanied her father on a boat trip and watched as he fell from the boat and drowned before her eyes.
After that experience, Lina wrote the other hymn for which she is most known in the English-speaking world, Day By Day.

Day by day and with each passing moment
Strength I find to meet my trials here
Trusting in my Father’s wise bestowment
I’ve no cause for worry or for fear
He whose heart is kind beyond all measure
Gives unto each day what He deems best!
Lovingly its part of pain and pleasure
Mingling toil with peace and rest.
***
GJ - The senseless violence in Connecticut today has affected the entire nation. When people have expressed how difficult it must be to lose two daughters,Bethany and Erin Joy, as we did, I have mentioned how much worse it is to lose a child from an accident, and worst of all - to violence.
We had the advantage of trying everything possible, even using tests the health insurance had never heard of at the time (gas chromatograph mass spectrometer). Many therapies were attempted, and both girls gained the attention of doctors from the Cleveland Clinic to Harvard to Switzerland. We enjoyed our daughters' love, and they were adored by many who came to cheer them up and found themselves cheered instead.
These Connecticut parents, grandparents, siblings, teachers, police officers, and medical professionals will suffer the worst kind of grief in the coming years. Those who campaign in self-righteous anger, using the crisis for more laws, will not help. 
America has embraced godlessness, extreme violence, drug and alcohol abuse. Our great and wise ones engage in constant mockery of anything decent, inspiring, or patriotic. I feel assaulted by a constant display of vampire images and occult veneration. Every heritage except the Judeo-Christian is honored.

We will continue to suffer from this kind of violence as long as we sow the weed seeds of self-destruction.

Bethany filled Ida's life with joy.
Ida was her nurse.

Erin Joy grabbed her bear for the Midland Daily News photographer.
She had a big fan club in town.

Richard Bliese resigns as president of ELCA's Luther Seminary - News Releases - Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

Richard Biese earned his MDiv at Seminex,
the first (but not last) gay Lutheran seminary.
WELS UOJ theologian Richard Jungkuntz chaired the board of Seminex.
Jenswold and Lindemann's buddy in Fox Valley is another Seminex MDiv.


Richard Bliese resigns as president of ELCA's Luther Seminary - News Releases - Evangelical Lutheran Church in America:


ELCA NEWS SERVICE
December 11, 2012
Richard Bliese resigns as president of ELCA's Luther Seminary
12-75-MRC

      CHICAGO (ELCA) -- The Rev. Dr. Richard Bliese has resigned as president of Luther Seminary, St. Paul, Minn., according to a Dec. 10 announcement from the seminary. Luther is one of eight seminaries of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA). Bliese served as president since 2005.

      “Throughout this church there are members deeply grateful for the gifted pastors and lay leaders who have been prepared for ministry during Dr. Bliese's tenure as president of Luther Seminary,” said the Rev. Mark S. Hanson, ELCA presiding bishop.

      “Dr. Bliese's consistent priority was for Luther Seminary to prepare evangelical leaders to serve God's mission in a rapidly changing and increasingly diverse context. He was committed to developing partnerships with congregations with particular focus on stewardship, leadership and preaching,” said Hanson.

      Bliese “built upon Luther's strong faculty with new appointments that brought ecumenical and global perspectives. He led Luther through the expansion of distance learning offerings while maintaining a commitment to the benefits of learning in a seminary community that gathers for worship, study and conversation,” said Hanson. “I thank God for Rick's leadership.”

      The Rev. James M. Lindus, chair of Luther’s board of directors, expressed gratitude for Bliese’s leadership and “for all Rick has done during his years at Luther Seminary.”

      Bliese’s “compelling vision, unwavering commitment to Luther Seminary’s mission and aggressive strategic plan have helped the seminary maintain a healthy enrollment of students, a stellar faculty and strong financial support from loyal and dedicated donors,” said Lindus.

      While the seminary continues to function at “a high level,” said Lindus, Luther is facing “a difficult combination of challenges, not unlike those faced by many other institutions of higher education. These challenges include deferred maintenance charges related to aging buildings, the costs of delivering a wide variety of educational programs and a nationwide drop in the number of students attending seminaries.”

      Lindus said that the transition in leadership comes at a time when the financial performance of the seminary has lagged expectations. The seminary is taking positive measures to ensure its financial health, which has included the naming of an interim chief financial officer.

      Prior to his presidency, Bliese was the seminary’s dean of academic affairs and associate professor of missions from 2003 to 2005. Before joining Luther, he served as the director of graduate studies and as the Augustana Heritage associate professor of global mission and evangelism at the Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago, an ELCA seminary. While there, Bliese served as a part-time pastor at St. Andrews Lutheran Church, Glenwood, Ill.

      A graduate of Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, Bliese earned a master of divinity degree from Christ Seminary Seminex, St. Louis, in 1981. His first call as an ordained pastor was to St. Stephanus Lutheran Church in Herne, Germany. After serving four years there, he accepted a position with the United Evangelists Missions in Germany as director of the continuing education program for pastors and evangelists in Zaire and Rwanda.

      From 1986 to 1990, he led a small urban congregation in Bukavu, Zaire, and focused on directing continuing education programs at the Centre D'Accueil Protestante Ecumenical Center, School for Evangelists in Zaire and Rwanda. There he established the center’s schools of music, evangelism and language, and co-founded a regional development office for research and technical assistance.

      After 10 years overseas, Bliese returned to the United States and earned a master of theology in 1992 and a doctorate in confessional theology from the Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago in 1995.

      In addition to his teaching and pastoral career, Bliese has led mission and evangelism seminars and workshops as an independent consultant, administered the Hein-Fry Lecture Series, and served as president of the Center for World Christian Interaction. He has published articles throughout the world and co-edited “The Dictionary of Mission: Theology, History, Perspectives” (1997) and was co-editor of “The Evangelizing Church: A Lutheran Contribution (2005).”




'via Blog this'

Norman Teigen Encountered the LCMS Kool-Aid Krew on the ALPB Forum

Walther pretended he suddenly found out about Stephan's adultery, but Stephan left Frau Pfarrer in Germany and traveled to America with his young mistress, Louise Guenther.


Norman Teigen has left a new comment on your post "Walther Said - "Slavery is good!"":

The responses on the ALPB Forum on this subject have been interesting. I had written that my comments on the NY Times had been published. I was brought to task for that and apologized because they had been transmitted, not published.

One really nasty commentator this morning questioned my faith. I was quite surprised by this but felt gratified by some who supported my attempt to get into a historical question. By this afternoon the offensive post had been removed.

It's really strange, isn't it, how some people feel that their particular ideas on a certain subject are sacrosanct. Doesn't say much, does it, about the intellectual breadth of those people.

***

GJ - Bishop Stephan's crimes are well known. So are Walther's. But the hagiographers tell a completely different story. Their lies explain why the good ol' Synodical Conference is  in the dumper today, why the biggest deceivers and plagiarists get the most money - while workers starve and students enslave themselves to student loans.

Walther and Stephan had nothing against slavery. Neither do the Concordia Seminary profs.



---

ALPB Forum


Johannes Andreas Quenstedt



Re: CFW Walther and Slavery
« Reply #52 on: Today at 03:43:46 PM »
Getting back to the topic, I recall hearing stories from those who were in conversation with folks who lived in that period of time. Evidently it was common place for slaves in St. Louis area to be paraded around totally naked so that the more buff and attractive men and women could be sold at the highest price possible. I also came across a depiction of slavery in St. Louis in which William Wells Brown, a former slave, writes:

"I shall never forget a scene which took place in the city of St. Louis, while I was in slavery. A man and his wife, both slaves, were brought from the country to the city, for sale. They were taken to the rooms of AUSTIN & SAVAGE, auctioneers...Several slave-speculators, who are always to be found at auctions where slaves are to be sold, were present. The man was first put up, and sold to the highest bidder. The wife was next ordered to ascend the platform. I was present. She slowly obeyed the order. The auctioneer commenced, and soon several hundred dollars were bid. My eyes were intensely fixed on the face of the woman, whose cheeks were wet with tears. But a conversation between the slave and his new master attracted my attention. I drew near them to listen. The slave was begging his new master to purchase his wife. Said he, "Master, if you will only buy Fanny, I know you will get the worth of your money. She is a good cook, a good washer, and her last mistress liked her very much. If you will only buy her how happy I shall be." The new master replied that he did not want her but if she sold cheap he would purchase her. I watched the countenance of the man while the different persons were bidding on his wife. When his new master bid on his wife you could see the smile upon his countenance, and the tears stop; but as soon as another would bid, you could see the countenance change and the tears start afresh."

"From this change of countenance one could see the workings of the inmost soul. But this suspense did not last long; the wife was struck off to the highest bidder, who proved not to be the owner of her husband. As soon as they became aware that they were to be separated, they both burst into tears; and as she descended from the auction-stand, the husband, walking up to her and taking her by the hand, said, "Well, Fanny, we are to part forever, on earth; you have been a good wife to me. I did all that I could to get my new master to buy you; but he did not want you, and all I have to say is, I hope you will try to meet me in heaven. I shall try to meet you there." The wife made no reply, but her sobs and cries told, too well, her own feelings. I saw the countenances of a number of whites who were present, and whose eyes were dim with tears at hearing the man bid his wife farewell."
 - -http://www.usgennet.org/usa/mo/county/stlouis/slavery.htm

Surely C.F.W. Walther should have been aware of such heart wrenching stories. That he did not both mention and condemn such practices in his writings is a horrific tragedy.

It is interesting that C.F.W. Walther also states in his Lehre und Wehre article on slavery:

The same spirit which in Europe declared the rank of princes to be an outrage in this century, who strove to depose them and replace them with democracy as the only rightful order; this same spirit compels them here to denounce slavery as a degradation of free-born man. It drives them to communism,demanding women’s emancipation (though they quite clearly agree that the female, according to God’s order, is in a certain kind of slavery)Every Christian who aids these agitators concerning slavery, is in the service of this radical-revolutionary spirit. (emphasis added)


I suspect that C.F.W. Walther was influenced by his Moravian background. Moravian missionaries, especially in the Caribbean, owned and used slaves. 

I understand that Scandinavian immigrants were given theological and ethical exhortations from Europe to not settle in places where there was slavery.  It is interesting that (according to census data) when Walther settled in Perry County there was a higher percentage of slaves in relationship to the rest of the population, than in other areas close by. 

Walther was in deep theological error about the institution of slavery. And the church today should both acknowledge it and repent of it.

---


Quote
We can admire the good things he did and wrote while acknowledging his errors and deploring his wrongs.  If interested, we can also examine how he came to the erroneous positions he did so that we might be able to avoid similar mistakes.

Good point. How did C.F.W. Walther come to his erroneous position? You can get a clue from the following statement by Walther (emphasis added):



We therefore hold that abolitionism, which deems slavery a sin and therefore considers every slave holder a criminal and strives for its eradication, is the result of unbelief in its development of nationalism, deistic philanthropy, pantheism, materialism, and atheism. It is a brother of modern socialism, Jacobinism and communism. Together with the emancipation of women it is the rehabilitation of the flesh. As proof of this blood-relationship it suffices to point not only to its history, but also to the close union between abolition-minded representatives of Christianity and the abolitionist tendencies of anti-Christians and radical revolutionaries in church, state, and home. The more their non-religiosity increases and reaches the pinnacles of theoretical atheism and indifferentism, the more fanatically they fight for the principle of slave emancipation.

Three Statues for the Great Kidnapper - Plus Large Doses of Hagiography

Both of these minor children died later in America.
The niece was allowed to hang around Bishop Stephan, STD ,
and his young female groupies.
Is that why LCMS had a Walther League? Ugh.


Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Walther Said - "Slavery is good!"":

Ichabod -

At least the non religious secular Penn State had enough smarts and honesty to remove Joe Paterno's statute. But, the LCMS, apparently has no godly shame.

Thank you for pointing out this historical reality. It seems the more that is divulged about C.F. Walther; the more bizarre LCMS becomes, for standing by the man who tolerated Bishop Stephan's marital infidelities. Shame on the leadership of the LCMS for perpetuating the Walther myth!

LCMS - Tear down his graven images! Show some self respect!

Nathan M. Bickel
www.thechristianmessage.org
www.moralmatters.org

Walther solved the financial crisis of the sex cult by robbing Stephan of all his gold.
Zion on the Mississippi shows that the clergy knew all about Stephan's adultery.
"Discovering it from a confession" was a big, honking lie.

Charitable Deductions May Finish Off One LCMS Seminary

Thrivent loot is just like lottery money -
where does it all go?


bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Judgment Day Approaches for the LCMS Seminaries":

2013 is really shaping up to be judgment day for the LCMS seminaries. President Harrison said that neither of the seminaries would close under his watch, but since then the govt has stopped subsidizing student loans to the extent that the govt doesn't pay interest while the student is in school, and the interest rate may climb in the future, and now the charitable deduction might be reduced or even eliminated in order to bring down the deficit. The Washington Post notes that Lutheran Services has been lobbying against that:

==========

White House, nonprofit groups battle over charitable deductions

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-nonprofit-groups-battle-over-charitable-deductions/2012/12/13/80e67400-43f2-11e2-9648-a2c323a991d6_story.html

But the White House is also looking to limit the charitable deduction for high-income earners, and that has prompted frustration and resistance, with leaders of major nonprofit organizations, such as the United Way, the American Red Cross and Lutheran Services of America, closing ranks in opposing any change to the deduction.

“It’s all castor oil,” said Diana Aviv, president of Independent Sector, an umbrella group representing many nonprofits. “And the members of the nonprofit sector I represent don’t want any part of it. It’s a medicine we’re not willing to drink.”

========

LCMS seminary students borrow excessively to overpay their professors salaries.
Does anyone notice this scam?
Not when the top two at CPH make more than $500,000 in salaries and benefits.

Hogs Take Wisconsin Coaches To Replace Petrino Staff

Everyone hailed the firing of Coach Petrino,
whose face was explained as a close encounter with his mistress' fiance.
I thought he would become a WELS mission counselor or Planned Giving Counselor.


bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Bobby Petrino, Jessica Dorrell talked frequently, ...":

UW-Wisconsin football takes a big hit over Joe Petrino's adultery. WI loses its head coach Bielema to Arkansas, and then Bielema hires away WI's defensive coordinator.

Petrino lost his $3.5 million head coaching job at Arkansas, and now he accepted a coaching job at Western Kentucky for a quarter of his previously salary. Also, he's locked in for four years or else he has to pay a $1.2 million penalty.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/football/ncaa/12/10/bobby-petrino-western-kentucky.ap/index.html

Western Kentucky gave Petrino a four-year deal with a base annual salary of $850,000. If he terminates the deal at any time, he must re-pay the university $1.2 million in six monthly payments starting the month after he leaves.

Bielema hires Ash to run defense:
http://www.katv.com/story/20320037/bielema-hires-ash-to-run-defense

Thursday, December 13, 2012

Walther Said - "Slavery is good!"

The syphilitic founder of the LCMS, Martin Stephan,
chose a slave state for his groupie Zion.
His Pietistic Bohemians owned slaves.

Norman Teigen wrote on the Opionator blog, New York Times:

Another German reactionary was CFW Walther who was the founding father of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod. Walther defended slavery using arguments from the Southern slavery apologists. He sided with the Confederate side in the 1861 St. Louis arsenal conflict. Walther did not raise the stars and bars, as some deteactors claimed, over the Lutheran seminary which he headed. Walther did greatly offend Lutherans in Minnesota and Wisconsin who withdrew their sons from the St. Louis seminary. Walther never retracted his slavery remarks. Walther became a highly revered ecclesiastical figure. His elaborate tomb is in St. Louis. Some Lutherans continue to defend Walther's slavery writings although his church does not.

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Midweek Advent Service. December 12, 2012



Advent, December 12, 2012

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Mid-Week Advent,  Wednesday, 7 PM Central

The Hymn #81   Gerhardt         Thy Manger Is            3.60
The Order of Vespers                                             p. 41
The Psalmody            Psalm 100                             p. 144
The First Lection                      
The Second Lection           
 The Sermon Hymn #90  Gerhardt   Come Your Hearts 3.83

The Word Brings Christ To Us

The Prayers and Lord’s Prayer                         p. 44
The Collect for Peace                                           p. 45
The Benediction                                                   p. 45
The Hymn # 93        O Lord We Welcome    3.40

KJV John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. 6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. 7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. 8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. 9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. 10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. 11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not. 12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. 15 John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. 16 And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. 17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. 18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

 

The Word Brings Christ To Us


KJV John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

This Logos Hymn teaches us about Christ and also about the Holy Trinity. Jesus is the Creating Word, there at the beginning. And yet, we have the Word used three times in the same verse – typical of Trinitarian references. When God is revealed to us in the Word, we often find groups of three. This verse shows us the Unity of the Three Persons and the Three-ness of God. And yet, the Son of God as the Logos (the Word) is emphasized.

The Gospel of John begins with the same words as Genesis, the only book of the Bible to do this.

As Luther taught, the Word brings Christ to us as the Gospel proclamation. This is the One who died for our sins. The Holy Spirit teaches us about the Father/Son relationship especially in the Gospel of John, in the words of Jesus Himself. Simply describing that means naming the Persons of the Trinity.

The Word brings Christ to us, which means the Holy Spirit creates and sustains faith in us through that Gospel of Christ. Through that faith we receive forgiveness of sins and the promise of eternal life.

2 The same was in the beginning with God.

The text could be translated – That Same Word. It is an emphatic statement, used when there is a possibility of confusion. It creates absolute clarity.

You could ask, “Who was in the beginning with God”?

The answer is  - “He was. Jesus the Son of God, the Word.”

3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

Not enough can be said about this in a large book. Every single aspect of “nature” of Creation is from the Creating Word, the Son of God. The hymnal you hold in your hand. The gold in the wedding ring. The diamond. The chemicals that make up your body and the give life to your loved ones. Wood, stone, metal, air – every single element came from the Son of God, the Lord of Creation.

The Lutherans grasp this best in their hymns, especially in Gerhardt. Jesus was enclosed in the stone cave, the very stone He created and could destroy with one Word.

4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

Wherever the Word is, there springs eternal life. This is not just biological life, but eternal life. How could ordinary life be the light of men? This can only mean another expression of the Gospel.

As you recall from many repetitions, God created light before the sun and stars. In other words, truth existed before the sources of created light. Those lights are subordinate to the Light of Men – the Son of God. He is truth, as He said, “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life.”



5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

This truth illuminates the darkness, but the darkness (evil) cannot grasp or extinguish it. These two must exist until the end – light and darkness, good and evil, those who believe and those who do not.

6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. 7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. 8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.

This is a type of side-bar, to show people that John the Baptist was famous as a prophet, but sent by God to prepare people for the Messiah. These three verses are more like prose in the midst of poetry.

9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.

Here emphasis is used again, to distinguish between Jesus as the Son of God and John as the prophet going before Him. This contrast makes it clear – that John was the promised prophet, Jesus the promised Messiah and Savior.

10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. 11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.

This is the cross. From the lofty verses of the Creation we come to the rejection of His mission and message of forgiveness. They did not believe. His own people, His own creation, did not receive Him.

Notice the parallel – receive and believe. This is what many miss. Some turn faith into “making a decision” which is not the same as “receiving.”
Some Lutherans do not like the word “faith” and teach against it, as if faith means something other than “receive.”

Jesus comes to us in the Gospel Word – and we receive it. We hear it with sincerity and trust in its truth – because we know and experience that the Gospel is truth itself, light and life.

12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

Here faith is clearly the parallel term, the synonym for “receive.” As many as believed in Him. If there is doubt, read John 16:8ff – the Holy Spirit convicts the world of sin, because they do not believe on Him.

This is the Gospel – saving faith – that trust which receives the promises and blessings of God.

For that reason, the next segment is a great doxology – praise of God and glory in Christ who comes to us in the Word.

14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. 15 John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. 16 And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. 17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. 18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.


Comments from 29A and Brett Meyer


In a recent communication, 29A pointed out that the avalanche of Biblical translations is having the effect of destroying Biblical doctrine.

I thought that was an astute observation. WELS will adopt and sell the New NIV precisely for that reason. UOJ does not stand up to the plain Word of God, in Greek or English, so the NNIV paraphrase serves a useful purpose in providing the dogma that the mainline denominations want.

Biblical inerrancy is not much of a stance when defending the NNIV, joining with the most Leftist denominations of the National Council of Churches.

Missouri is no better, since their beloved ESV is more accurately called the Calvinist edition of the RSV, which is owned by the...National Council of Churches.

That follows the modern political trickery of providing a safe alternative in the same orbit as the one that must be shunned. Thus RomneyCare versus ObamaCare, Global Warming McCain versus Global Warming Obama; Yale Skull and Bones Bush versus Yale Skull and Bones Kerry.

http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2012/12/how-does-one-interpret-language-in-post.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+IntrepidLutherans+%28Intrepid+Lutherans%29

As reported several times before, the NNIV philosophy comes from an apostate. One advisor was a lesbian, etc.

---

Typical UOJ fanatic.



Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Step Up for a Liter of WELS Kool-Aid":

We see this today in those who openly reject universal forgiveness in Christ. Such people may think they are evangelical and confessional and genuinely Lutheran, but in every case I have seen, they confuse law and gospel in the most wretched way, and most sadly, they deny the fullness, the freedom and the completeness of the gospel. They are unwilling to say in an unqualified and unconditional way, "God has forgiven your sins in Christ! God canceled your debt in Christ!" They speak of the necessity of repentance and the righteousness of faith and the importance of faith and the confessional doctrine of justification by faith—and we deny none of these things!— but finally their aberrant spirit is revealed when it becomes obvious that their “gospel” is qualified and conditional and loaded with “ifs.” They offer potential forgiveness as an unfulfilled promise until the conditions of repentance and faith are met. It is a wrong, legal focus that is more about the individual than it is about the object. Confusion of law and gospel and a preponderance of law expose the sinister, diabolical agenda that robs God of glory and deprives sinners of certain comfort in Christ.
Page 30
http://azcadistrict.com/sites/default/files/papers/Buchholz_2012-10.pdf

This UOJ quote is from (W)ELS DP Pastor Jon Buchholz’ most recent defense of Universal Justification and his excommunication of Pastor Paul Rydecki for teaching Justification by Faith Alone. It is similar to the false statement quoted by (W)ELS Evergreen Lutheran High School in defense of their attack on Justification by Faith Alone written in the WELS Our Great Heritage, “And yet many Lutherans still labor under the delusion that God does not forgive us unless we believe. Instead of seeing faith as nothing more than the spiritual hand with which we make the forgiveness of God our own, they see it as a reason why God forgives us. They believe that Christ has indeed provided forgiveness for all men, that God is willing to forgive them, but before he really forgives he first of all demands that we should be sorry for our sins and that we should have faith. Just have faith they say, and then God will forgive you. All the right words are there. The only thing wrong is that the words are in the wrong order. God does not forgive us IF we have faith. He has forgiven us long ago when he raised his Son from the dead." (p. 59)
"If forgiveness were dependent on faith in the sense that God does not forgive until we believe, we would always have to be sure that we are believers before we would be sure that we are forgiven." (p.60)
Vol. 3

Buchholz is defending the shame of the (W)ELS perversion of the chief and central article of Christ’s doctrine – Justification. If UOJ teaches contrary to Scripture in just one point it is a false doctrine. In fact, it fails in all points and has been clearly shown to be a false gospel, a new and false way of righteousness before God, which perverts the work of Christ, the declarations of God the Father, the righteousness of the Holy Spirit’s faith and the Means of Grace.

Compare the UOJ statements above to Christ’s clear Scripture in John 3:18, “He that believeth on him his not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.” And John 3:36, “He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.”

Buchholz, Webber, Schroeder and the rest are leading the Lutheran Synods away from Scripture and the faithful Lutheran Confessions and into the New Age religion by teaching Universal Objective Justification and that there are multiple realities with God. Little surprise then that they are working with Thrivent Financial for Lutherans to sponsor and support the United Religions Initiative (URI) which is a NGO of the United Nations and the religious arm of the New World Order.


VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - CHARLESTON, SC: Parishes are free to choose their own future, says bishop.
"It Cannot Happen Here," Schroeder and Harrison Hope and Pray

VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - CHARLESTON, SC: Parishes are free to choose their own future, says bishop:


The Bishop of South Carolina, Mark Lawrence told the majority of his clergy and parishes that they have been set free to go wherever they want ecclesiastically. He has made no decision as to what he and those who follow him will do.

Those who stay are free to opt out and free to decide their future, he said. The diocese, under Lawrence, still retains the name and legal seal of the Diocese of South Carolina. It will continue under that name and seal even though it is no longer a diocese of The Episcopal Church.

"Those who are not with us, you may go in peace; your properties intact. Those who have yet to decide we give you what time you need. Persuasion is almost always the preferable policy, not coercion. By God's grace we will bear you no ill," he told his diocese. Earlier in the year Lawrence issued a 'quit claim' to parishes allowing them disaffiliate from the diocese and choose their own ecclesiastical authority.

"We have many friends among the bishops, priests and laity of TEC, and we wish you well. Furthermore, I bear no ill toward the Episcopal Church. She has been the incubator for an Anglican Christianity where God placed me many years ago." He described his differences with the Episcopal Church as a 'lover's quarrel.'

"To all who will continue with us: 'Let us rend our hearts and not our garments.' Let us be careful not to poison the waters of our communities with our differences with TEC. We shall move on."

Lawrence said that having moved on the Standing Committee's resolution of disassociation, disassociation has been accomplished legally and canonically. "The resolutions before you this day are affirmations of that fact. You have only to decide if that is your will and your emotions will follow."

Canon lawyer Ross "Buddy" Lindsay told VOL that the situation with the Diocese of South Carolina is no different from the Anglican Mission in the Americas (AMIA). "The Episcopal Church cannot get its hands on the properties thanks to the All Saints Supreme Court decision."

The Rt. Rev. Greg Brewer, a Communion Partner bishop and TEC Bishop of Central Florida who read Lawrence's speech described it as "heartbreaking."

Interestingly those overseas bishops who sent words of encouragement were all from the same jurisdiction: Egypt, North Africa, Horn of Africa - all under Presiding Bishop Mouneer Anis. Lawrence has been cultivating this relationship for some time. This could indicate from where his future affiliation will come.

Without Anglican authority, the question then becomes: who will Archbishop Justin Welby recognize once he becomes the Archbishop of Canterbury? Welby visited with the TEC House of Bishops last spring and spoke favorably to them.

Another orthodox Anglican Bishop raised the specter of Katharine Jefferts Schori going into Federal court since there is a plurality of jurisdictions (NY vs. SC) and an amount at stake of more than $75,000. By going into federal court, she bypasses entirely the state Supreme Court Dennis Canon ruling and gets a new bite at the apple. 

While Jefferts Schori cannot get her hands on parishes because the Dennis Canon has been ruled out of court, she could go for the diocese's downtown headquarters.

One thing is for sure, TEC's Presiding Bishop will now formally approach Bishop Charles vonRosenberg, a resident retired bishop in the diocese, to lead the rebel FORUM parishes, about a dozen, and form a new diocese with the same name as the current diocese. It is only a matter of time before Lawrence is formally deposed.

In his message to the diocese, Lawrence stated, "South Carolina has been and continues to be a microcosm of North American Anglicanism-with all that is good and vital, and all that is most troubling. In an address at the Mere Anglicanism Conference last January I noted that there were some six overlapping jurisdictions within the boundaries of our diocese all making claims one way or another to being Anglican.

"With the exception of this Diocese of South Carolina, the oldest of these Churches is the Reformed Episcopal Church. There are many REC congregations throughout South Carolina. They reach a good number of people with a vital faith and a strong Anglican tradition. They have a goodly heritage and a seminary just up the road in Summerville. Then there's the Anglican Mission in America (AMiA) which has until recently been the mother church of their movement at Pawleys Island. Recently the All Saints' Pawleys Island congregation voted to associate with the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA). But AMiA has still other congregations scattered across the Low Country-some with bishops and some with rectors. 

"Then this year ACNA ordained a former rector of this diocese, The Rt. Rev. Steve Wood, of St. Andrew's Mt. Pleasant as the first bishop of their new Diocese of the Carolinas, which includes North and South Carolina. St. Andrew's offers dynamic ministry and many within this diocese have kept bridges of relationships with these brothers and sisters in Christ and for this I give thanks. There are other Anglican bodies as well, some of whose bishops I know and some I do not."

Lawrence called the situation "un-Anglican."

"All these bishops overlapping one another - South Carolina may well be the most 'Anglicanized' turf in North America. Everybody's talking about Anglicans. You know what happens when everyone's talking about Baptists? They grow churches. Everyone's' talking about Anglicans. It's our moment."

When asked about affiliation at a press conference following his address, Lawrence commented, "For now-no one. As any wise pastor will tell you, if you been in a troubling, painful or dysfunctional relationship for a long period of time and then the marriage or relationship ends, you would be wise not to jump right away into the first one that comes along and tie the knot. You'd be wise take your time. God will guide us, we will stay in."

You can watch a video of Bishop Lawrence's speech here:
http://www.anglican.tv/content/diocese-south-carolina-special-convention-bishops-address

'via Blog this'

VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - An Open Letter to Sewanee VC McCardell Concerning Status of Diocese of SC.
Big Money Involved at Sewanee




VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - An Open Letter to Sewanee VC McCardell Concerning Status of Diocese of SC:

An Open Letter to Sewanee Vice Chancellor McCardell Concerning Status of Diocese of South Carolina

From VirtueOnline: The Voice of Global Orthodox Anglicanism

David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org 
November 20, 2012 

Dear Dr. McCardell, 

As Vice Chancellor of Sewanee: University of the South, you must be distressed over the horrific news about the long anticipated schism between the Diocese of South Carolina, an owning diocese of the University, and The Episcopal Church, headquartered at 815 Second Avenue in New York City.

VOL's sources tell us that the ugly turmoil will hurt Sewanee's fundraising efforts among South Carolina's finest Episcopalians and best alumni. If this is untrue, please respond accordingly, and I will share the news.

Given the seriousness and rapidity of recent harsh developments for the worse, the Anglican Communion and the Sewanee community of faculty, staff, students, alumni, and donors can no longer wait for your much anticipated and needed statement about the general conditions of the breach; therefore, as the editor of the leading and most reliable Anglican alternative news website, I am posting online this letter of inquiry.

You may reply directly to me, and I will respectfully post your response in a follow up news story.david@virtueonline.org

Your own Low Country South Carolina cottage is located in a safe and non diverse section of beautiful and historic Old Beaufort, which makes St. Helena your home parish. St. Helena still claims membership in Bishop Mark Lawrence's Diocese of South Carolina.

1. Do you consider Bishop Lawrence to be your bishop? 

As of today, Sewanee's website still lists Bishop Lawrence as a Trustee of the University. Based on TEC's hostile attack against Lawrence, and the resolutions confirming withdrawal from TEC that were passed by his diocese yesterday in Charleston, resolutions which included your Parish of St. Helena as a sponsor, your home diocese has now returned to its historic and non integrated independent ecclesiastical existence. 

2. Is Bishop Lawrence still a trustee of Sewanee Episcopal University? 

Based upon news reports, TEC is now organizing rump leadership for a replacement Episcopal diocese in South Carolina, with Bishop Charles vonRosenberg, the retired Bishop of East Tennessee and former Sewanee trustee, as its leader.

3. Is Bishop von Rosenberg your bishop, and do you expect him to replace Bishop Lawrence on Sewanee's board of trustees? 

4. If you do expect Bishop von Rosenberg to replace Bishop Lawrence, or if such a change is probable, why have you not yet notified your alumni and donors in South Carolina of this pending material change in University governance, especially now when many families are considering year end gifts to Sewanee's annual fund? 

5. In general, why have you not kept in constant communication with your most prominent South Carolina donors during this time of grief and regret? Why have you delayed in issuing any statements?

6. If you do issue your forthcoming statement and take a strong stand in favor of Bishop Lawrence, whom at Sewanee, especially at the Seminary, and even at 815, do you most fear will make retribution against you? 

The prominent anti Lawrence, pro TEC lawyer, Josephine Hicks, is a feminist Sewanee alumna. She serves on her law firm's "Diversity Committee."

"Parker Poe was one of the first law firms in North Carolina to have a lawyer provide this type of central oversight of diversity and inclusion initiatives. The Firm also created a Diversity Committee which is charged with developing, monitoring and evaluating Parker Poe's initiatives and progress in recruiting and retaining a diverse workforce and creating a firm-wide atmosphere of inclusiveness."

"In order to further diversify our attorney base, the Firm also actively recruits lateral women and minority partners and associates."

"Our female and minority attorneys are involved in leadership positions within the Firm. One female partner serves on the Board of Directors, a female partner serves as a Practice Group Leader, a female partner serves as Chairperson of the Firm's Diversity Committee, another female partner serves as the Chairperson of the Professional Review Committee, and a female partner serves as the Chairperson of the newly formed Community Service Committee. Our women attorneys also hold a variety of community leadership roles including serving as Chairperson of the North Carolina Symphony Society, Chairperson of the Carolina Ballet, member of the Board of Directors of the Charlotte Women's Bar, Past President of the Wake County Bar Association, and Past President of CREW (Commercial Real Estate Women)."

7. Have you ever had any communications from Josephine Hicks regarding either your or Sewanee's relationship with Bishop Lawrence and his diocese?

In the coming months, massive and horrendous legal attacks are expected from TEC as further assaults against Bishop Lawrence, the Diocese of South Carolina, and even your own St. Helena in Beaufort. As Sewanee is very rich with $318,000,000 of income generating endowment investments, much of it contributed by faithful Episcopalians in South Carolina from generations past and present, Sewanee is in a unique position to help promote justice, reconciliation, and healing in South Carolina. 

8. Will you offer strong leadership to the budget committees at Sewanee to do the right thing by issuing a sizable and Christian affirming financial grant to Bishop Lawrence to help fight off TEC in court?

9. If you do come to the financial and moral aid of "the least of these" in South Carolina, but TEC's brutality against dissent is victorious in the end, will you ask Bishop Lawrence to return his Sewanee honorary degree? 

Sewanee boasts a large contingent of students from South Carolina, as it has for decades. The tenor of your campus for these students can be either positively or negatively affected by TEC's next steps. If not already, Sewanee can quickly become unsafe for these students. 

10. What are you now doing in your position of authority and leadership to engage the pro TEC forces on campus and to guaranteed that South Carolinians at Sewanee are protected from the kind of ugly bigotry and prejudice that creates a hostile learning environment, as well as fuels the kind of unsustainable changes is social climate that permit reprisals and recriminations against those from South Carolina who are institutionally vulnerable because of their true Christian faith? 

Furthermore, and in related news, Bishop Scott Benhase, a Sewanee trustee, has forced TEC's anti Biblical, anti Christian, pro-gay Same Sex Blessings upon Episcopalians in the Diocese of Georgia. He is in keeping with the explicit pro-gay trends that are entrenched in Sewanee and are growing in Sewanee's owning dioceses.

11. Will you allow Same Sex Blessings in Sewanee's Chapel of the Apostles, and if not, why haven't you said so yet, and if so, likewise, why haven't you said so yet? 

We look forward to your responses.

David W. Virtue DD 
VIRTUEONLINE 

'via Blog this'

VirtueOnline - News.
PB Kate Goes Down South To Make Matters Worse.
Learning from John Moldstad?




VirtueOnline - News:

SOUTH CAROLINA: Back Room Politics Begin as Presiding Bishop Heads South to Revamp Diocese
Diocese responds to Presiding Bishop's intrusion: "They cannot assume our identity," says Lawrence

By David W. Virtue 
www.virtueonline.org
December 10, 2012

As the head of the national Episcopal Church, Katharine Jefferts Schori, heads south in January to attend a special convention to choose a new provisional bishop in South Carolina, VOL has learned that fresh political intrigue is figuring into the picture, even as Bishop Mark Lawrence maintains he is the lawful bishop of The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina.

The Presiding Bishop will visit Charleston Jan. 25-26 for the election of the bishop and other diocesan leaders, said Hillery Douglas, chairman of the reorganization steering committee. She will convene a special convention at Grace Episcopal Church, 98 Wentworth St. in Charleston.

VOL was told that there are strong indications that retired Bishop Charles von Rosenberg is Jefferts Schori's provisional bishop of choice and she will appoint him the new leader of the diocese for those dozen or so parishes that wish to form a rump Episcopal diocese. Von Rosenberg was the third bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of East Tennessee.

The South Carolina diocese formally severed ties with the Episcopal Church on Oct. 17, 2012, after long-standing disagreements over same-sex marriages and the ordination of gay bishops.

Jefferts Schori will be welcomed with a reception and other special events Jan. 25. On Jan. 26 a committee of local Episcopalians will work with Jefferts Schori to find a nominee who already is a bishop and could immediately go to work in South Carolina to meet the needs of parishes and people here, said Holly Behre, steering committee communications chairwoman.

In recent years, provisional bishops have been called to serve in other dioceses where groups have broken away from the Episcopal Church. They lead until those dioceses are ready to install a non-provisional bishop, Behre said.

The new rector at Holy Cross/Faith Memorial, The Rev. William J. Keith who was called as recently as July 29 is one of the stalwarts for remaining in TEC. He was nominated and encouraged by von Rosenberg who was his bishop and some say a mentor in East Tennessee. Von Rosenberg is stacking the deck, said the source. 

"Von Rosenberg is purported to be making ecclesiastical decisions as a diocesan so this has obviously been the plan well before the mid October confirmation of what he was telling his friends. 

"He will meet Monday night on Kiawah Island where he has teamed up with Warren Mersereau, the activist layman who signed charges against Bishop Lawrence as well as steering committee member The Rev. Callie Perkins. They will speak to those in the area who want an Episcopal Church presence.

However the Rev. Mike Clarkson of Church of Our Saviour on Johns Island issued a statement today saying they would be following Bishop Mark Lawrence and would therefore be leaving the Episcopal Church. You can read his full statement here http://tinyurl.com/bhkqflf 

Jefferts Schori's last visit to the Diocese of South Carolina was in February 2008.

*****

Diocese Responds to Announcement of January TEC Meeting

Media Release 
December 10, 2012

Following the announcement that the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church plans a trip to Charleston for a January 25-26 convention of those wishing to re-associate with the Episcopal Church, the Diocese of South Carolina released the following statements: "They are certainly free to gather and meet, but they are not free to assume our identity. The Diocese of South Carolina has disassociated from the Episcopal Church, we've not ceased to exist. 

We continue to be the Diocese of South Carolina - also known, legally as the Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina and as the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina, of which I remain the Bishop. 

We are eager to get on with the ministry of Jesus Christ to a broken world. I suggest that the Steering Committee of this new group will want to do the same. A good first step for them would be to select a new name or choose another Diocese with which to associate." 

The Rt. Rev. Mark J. Lawrence XIV Bishop, Diocese of South Carolina "I would like to make a point of clarification for those who think we became a new entity upon our disassociation. A brief history lesson seems in order. We were founded in 1785 (prior to the founding of the Episcopal Church). 

We were incorporated in 1973; adopted our current legal name, "The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina," in 1987; and we disassociated from the Episcopal Church in October of 2012. 

We did not become a new entity upon our disassociation. A new entity will need to be created by those who choose to leave the Diocese and re-associate with the Episcopal Church." 

The Rev. Canon Jim Lewis 
Canon to the Ordinary, 
Diocese of South Carolina 

"They insist on what others must do yet there is no written standard to support them, and at the same time they run roughshod over their own constitution and canons. They have created a tails we win, heads you lose world where the rules are adjusted according to their desired outcomes--no wonder we dissociated from a community like that." 

The Rev. Dr. Kendall S. Harmon 
Canon Theologian, 
Diocese of South Carolina

'via Blog this'