Saturday, January 5, 2013

'Gay' clergy issue splitting churches

'Gay' clergy issue splitting churches:


Church

'GAY' CLERGY ISSUE SPLITTING CHURCHES

Charlie Butts   (OneNewsNow.com)
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
The Church of Scotland is experiencing a rift for the same reason churches in the U.S. are breaking away from their denominations.Members of an old Church of Scotland in Glasgow celebrated Christmas in new facilities this year after closing St. George's Tron over the issue of the ordination of homosexuals. Before closing its doors, the church's last service was held December 9. More than 500 worshippers came to hear Rev. Dr. Willie Philip deliver the final sermon.

LaBerge, Carmen Fowler (Presbyterian Lay Committee)That is a reflection of what is happening in reform churches worldwide, particularly in the Presbyterian Church USA, says Carmen Fowler LaBerge of the Presbyterian Lay Committee. LaBerge says it is not the church that is leaving the denomination; the denomination is leaving its members behind over theological disputes.

"We have Presbyterians who have been raised believing that the Bible is the Word of God, Jesus is the only way to salvation, that we are called to, by the power of the Holy Spirit, conform to the revealed will of God in the scriptures of the Old and New Testaments," LaBerge accounts.

But, she continues, there is also the emerging liberal group "believing that the Bible is a reference point to the Word of God, believing that Jesus is one way to salvation, believing that we are supposed to be adapting what our view of God is to the world in which we live," the Committee president notes.

She refers to it "as a self-inflicted mortal wound" and an expression of a "global realignment of Christianity." In response, biblically based churches are leaving for conservative denominations or new denominations.
Laberge asserts that many PC(USA), Lutheran, Episcopalian and United Methodist churches will close within the next decade.


'via Blog this'

Sects Necessary? - Pastors and Congregations Asking the Wrong Questions

Those "free" seminars are subsidized by Thrivent
so they can sell their insurance products via a
licensed insurance agent. Their paid agent is a
Planned Giving Counselor with a "divine call" from the greedy synod.
The agent gets a commission from each sale,
so don't let Gramps and Granny take a pen to the seminar.

Recently an independent Lutheran congregation discussed the issue of affiliating with a group. 

One of the council members asked, "What does any synod have to offer us?"

Another Lutheran observed in a phone conversation, "The synods are finished. It is just a matter of time."

The synod structures do not exist to preach the Gospel but to reward friends and relatives. Each one is a massive skimming operation. Some will say, "Except for the Little Sect on the Prairie." No, they get more bucks per communicant than anyone from Marvin Schwan indulgences and from Thrivent's pan-religious donations.

They beat the drums for more money but refuse to say how it is spent. Simply asking for an accounting is the same as begging to be excommunicated.

Education? They do not educate anyone in Lutheran doctrine or the Bible. Ask parochial school graduates if they even know what the Book of Concord is. Ask a DP to explain the Gospel in Biblical terms, without the OJ/SJ labels of Pietism.

The SynCons use their seminaries to untrain candidates in Biblical knowledge, making them fund the salaries of lazy professors who just happen to be political pals.

Lutherans and Episcopalians have discovered they can walk away from mental slavery and supervisory abuse to live in peace with like-minded individuals and congregations. Federations work better than hierarchies when men cannot restrain their greed and ambition.


---




Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Sects Necessary? - Pastors and Congregations Askin...":

Ichabod -

Yes - so aptly, put:

>>>>> "The synods are finished. It is just a matter of time." <<<<<

Those at the top of these ecclesiastical entities, will be the last to truly realize that reality. Why? Because Christ stated that He would build His Church.

Nathan M. Bickel
www.thechristianmessage.org
www.moralmatters.org 

The Mayans Suffered from High Self-Esteem Too

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/02files/Pyramids_World_02.html

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "New Age WELS - Business Philosophy Blends Well":

The Myans thought a lot of themselves, too, but not much remains from that civilization (and religion):

World's Largest Pyramid Discovered, Lost Mayan City Of Mirador Guatemala:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voY8jNcuGe8 


Charles Lindbergh first spotted the Mirador complex.

***


Pyramid of the Sun, near Mexico City.


GJ - I mentioned in a sermon that two of my classmates, confirmed in the same Lutheran church I attended, were recently discussing the growth of paganism and how good that was. One of them said his acquaintance "communed with the Mayan calendar" on display in Mexico - until the guard interrupted his reverie. 

The Neo-Pagans go to Mexico and to various pyramid sites to network with others suffering from the same delusions. Sedona, Arizona, attracted people to "vortex experiences."

I showed one dingy occult shop in Sedona to various guests and asked, "If they could see into the future and discern all kinds of occult secrets, wouldn't they be doing a little better than this?"

The Mainlines Fall All Over Each Other in Self-Destructive Acts.
VirtueOnline - News

VirtueOnline - News:

Episcopal Church Restructures Deck Chairs on SS TEC

News Analysis

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org 
December 31, 2012



Gay Jennings is no fool. She is the new president of the House of Deputies who has a long, illustrious history with the Episcopal Church and knows the game. She is leading the charge to restructure The Episcopal Church in the face of diminishing resources, aging parishioners, and decreasing income. Regrettably, many believe she is simply rearranging the deck chairs on the SS TEC as two gay bishops argue over the bar bill while The Episcopal Church sinks slowly beneath the waves.

Some 20 of the church's brightest and best (out of 400) have been chosen to lead the way forward. So, the first question must be asked, how many of those 20 are truly orthodox in faith and morals, men and women who will affirm the church's teaching on sexuality, as well as affirm the deity and bodily resurrection of Jesus? Bad theology will only lead to or extend inadequate structure.

The first issue one must ask when one discusses structure is this: Mission. What is or should be the church's mission? Here things get sticky. The Presiding Bishop believes that the Five Marks of Mission and MDGs should herald the church's mission. Her understanding of mission, however, is decidedly more humanistic than transcendent. The Five Marks developed by the Anglican Consultative Council are:

To proclaim the Good News of the Kingdom 
To teach, baptize and nurture new believers 
To respond to human need by loving service 
To seek to transform unjust structures of society 
To strive to safeguard the integrity of creation and sustain and renew the life of the earth

I have never heard anyone liberal expound upon the first two "Marks of Mission" that call for people to get into right relationship with God through our Lord Jesus Christ and then teaching, baptizing and nurturing new believers. Liberal Episcopalians and Anglicans quickly latch on to Marks 3, 4 and 5, ignoring the mandates of the first two. In doing this, they ignore the clear command of Christ and Scripture to proclaim the gospel to all nations - the call of the Great Commission. 

The prerogative of those who perform the first two of these Marks has fallen on The Anglican Church in North America (ACNA) who has made it a policy to plant 1000 new churches, based precisely on these two Marks. T'were the Episcopal Church to heed these opening two Marks, the outcome might be different, but that is by no means manifest, at this point in time. In fact, TEC seems to be going in the opposite direction.

In these five Marks, the divine call precedes social outreach, but that seems to be lost on the Church's hierarchy. Hopefully, Jennings will spot this and call the 20 to order, ere the group gets underway to look at TEC's structures. Dean Kevin Martin wisely points out that talking about The Millennium Goals or pointing to The Five Points of Mission is not the same as Mission itself. 

It should not go unnoticed that TEC has been following the trajectory of mainline Protestantism since the 1950s. Its raw numbers have gone from 3.6 million members in 1965 to less than 2 million today. Even that number is not realistic. The best figures are Average Sunday Attendance (ASA) , which are now below 700,000 and rapidly sinking. Wait till the figures come in for the new losses from the Diocese of South Carolina. We may see TEC sinking closer to 660,000 ASA by the end of 2013.

The deeper question is, just who are these 660,000+ Episcopalians? Well, according to TEC's own figures, they are people over the age of 60 in small congregations of less than 70, MOST of whom are concerned with their own survival. Most wouldn't know an MDG if it hit them in the butt; very few talk about the Five Marks of Mission. 

The Church's public face for the past 3-4 decades has been about pansexuality while promoting gay and lesbian priests and bishops - an issue that 90% or more of parishes are not the slightest bit interested in or are affected by and will never affect them in their local parish life. It's a game being played out on the left and right coasts (New Hampshire and California) with not much in between except as a theoretical issue. Most Episcopalians are still broadly conservative on social issues, but they go along with their priests and clergy to get along. 

Allowing the blessing of same sex marriages at Sewanee's University of the South's chapel will affect only a handful of people. It could have a devastating impact on the university's fund-raising abilities if conservative Episcopalians who have supported the university till now believe this is a bridge too far.

The real issue is how many sacred cows, in particular committees, commissions, and interim bodies, will actually be considered, writes Martin.

Another critical issue, and one that was recently raised in the Midwest, is, just how many dioceses should there be, as the Episcopal Church continues to shrink? In other words, whose ox is going to be gored when a bishop wakes up to the fact that he may have to be a worker bishop with a parish to sustain him? For example, as Bishop Neff Powell, the leader of the Episcopal Diocese of Southwestern Virginia, exits that diocese, there are rumblings from within that a new full time bishop with all the ecclesiastical trimmings of a full staff is unsustainable. Only a small handful of parishes now support the diocese. Will the Diocese of Vermont be viable five years from now?

In Nov. of 2011, I wrote that The Diocese of Rhode Island was on the brink of extinction. It has lost 30% of its attendees in the last 10 years. It is presently closing churches at an alarming rate, emptying endowments, and putting off maintenance. There are virtually no young people coming forward and no next generation to fill emptying pews. A resolution stated, "Church attendance in the Diocese of Rhode Island continues to follow the decreases experienced in all the dioceses of the Episcopal Church."

The Diocese of Washington relies on money from the Soper Fund to stay afloat. The diocese is currently fighting in court to wrest the bulk of the fund away from a bank that has been safe guarding the money and growing it. The bank knows full well that if the diocese ever gets its hands on it, the whole fund would soon dissipate under the revisionist leadership of Bishop Budde. (Bishop John Chane was angered at the $1 million of the fund spent by the late Bishop Jane Dixon to pursue one single Anglo-Catholic priest).

Many churches continue to rely on endowments to plug the gap between revenue and expenses, with decreasing effectiveness, as investment losses reduce available principle and income. This has a negative impact on the long-term survival of these churches. When church endowments decrease, there is less money available for local ministry, and fewer financial resources for diocesan ministry and operations, noted Martin.

In the Diocese of Connecticut, Bishop Ian Douglas publicly admitted to delegates at the 227th Diocesan Convention that God is pruning His Church based on St. John Chapter 15: "I am the true vine, and my Father is the vine grower..." while he himself has litigated and "pruned" the Venerable Ronald S. Gauss along with his evangelical parish of Bishop Seabury, one of the largest most successful parishes in the Northeast US, right out of the diocese.

While performing this parishectomy, Douglas announced the sale of the diocesan house, the reduction of his diocesan budget by $600,000, and the firing of six staff members at Church House. [GJ - Just like Pope John the Malefactor and Jon-Boy Buchholz. They think prunes are good for them, too.]


Across the country, nearly every diocese is in some sort of decline. Only the dioceses of Dallas, Texas, and South Carolina seemed to be spared the worst of God's wrath (SC has since departed TEC).

A radical restructuring would have to ask the question, is it good and right in the eyes of God to spend millions on litigation for properties that eventually lie fallow or are sold to Islamist groups or mega evangelical churches?

Clearly the status quo cannot be maintained. The institution in its present form is totally unsustainable.

The deeper question that must be asked is, is TEC's problem structural or does the problem lie elsewhere?

It is this writer's belief that to talk about structure is a smokescreen to push the deck chairs around a sloping deck with no substantive changes really being made.

The real problem is theological. True mission stems from good theology and sound teaching. That is what is missing in the church.

If you spend years writing papers, holding commissions trying to justify a particular sexual behavior that affects 1%-2% of the church, pour enormous financial resources in commissions to justify it, but fail to replenish the coffers, how is that sustainable? 

If the Episcopal Church honestly believes that brokering pansexuality has been a plus in the name of "rights" and "justice", it will have to live with that and also suffer the consequences. TEC leaders believed that back in 2003, when Robinson was consecrated bishop, it would jump-start the church with progressives, gays, and forward thinking people. It never happened. Five dioceses have left as have more than 100,000 Episcopalians. Liberals can shout and stomp their feet in existential fury and frustration and yell "fundamentalist" and "homophobia" at whomever they want, but it has not stopped the exit flow out of the church. How many more dioceses are in jeopardy of closing or leaving? Another blue ribbon panel won't cut it.

The awful truth is that millennials and Generations X & Y are not going to darken the doors of an Episcopal church that is constantly fighting over property and where those leaving TEC are made to look like victims (which they are) by a sympathetic press who sees TEC's leaders as little more than bullies over property snatchers.

The "nones", the new and emerging non church attenders in America, maybe sympathetic to homosexuals and may even approve of gay marriages, but that does not mean they will stumble into an Episcopal Church and suddenly raise their hands in wonderment at the rubbish preached from liberal pulpits.

Tim Keller, the highly successful church planter in New York City, perhaps in the US, is not talking about homosexuality from the pulpit as an inducement to come to church on Sunday morning. He is painting a totally different picture of discipleship. On its current projection, TEC will never reach people and draw them into TEC's fold with its present message that "sodomy saves". California might produce lesbian whackos like Susan Russell and Mary Glasspool and feel good types like Robert Schuller, but it also produces solidly orthodox church gospellers like Rick Warren, probably America's No.1 pastor. What he preaches, few in TEC would agree with.

Writes Martin, "There continues to be a major disconnect between our corporate structures and the local congregation. We continue to hear from denominational leaders that recent decisions have made us more viable to new generations and new ethnic groups which is making us a more inclusive and multi-cultural church. However, the numbers of declining congregations and the reality in the field is that local congregations are not, nor are most becoming, the kind of church that General Convention and the Executive Council say we are. Of course, we have some congregations that reflect this, but they are far from the norm of our local congregational life."

Martin said he has spent much time over the last ten years visiting Episcopal Churches and making presentations on congregational development. He observed that many congregations are struggling with basic survival issues. 

The problem in TEC is systemic, not structural. What is TEC's identity? What does it really stand for, apart from inclusiveness and diversity? The truth is those artificial dogmas are not selling in the market place of churches or church structures, only in the salons of New York City, millennial parties, and trendy hip hop places.

The problem is not that TEC's denominational structures beyond the diocesan level are "artificial constructs" as Martin suggests. It is deeper than that. All human constructs are, to some degree or another, artificial, but many survive and do well. The Roman Catholic Church is surviving despite some of the worst sexual behavior of some of priests in its recorded history. Its structure does not seem to be a problem.

The structural difference between a TEC parish and an ACNA parish is miniscule. They are both liturgical, use similar Prayer Books, say the same prayers of confession, and offer the sacrament with much the same formulas. What is different is the theological and psychological message coming from the pulpit. One preaches inclusion and God's indiscriminate love for absolutely everybody even unrepentant sinners; the other preaches a gospel of redemption and grace that calls sinners to repentance and a life of discipleship and faithfulness to scripture. 

The difference is in the message. If TEC does not change its message, it will continue on its gadarene slide into oblivion or, to use an earlier analogy, the SS TEC will only be rearranging the deck chairs with its inhabitants sipping Martinis as the ship goes down. There will be no eye to pity and no arm to save.

END



'via Blog this'

New Age WELS - Business Philosophy Blends Well




Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "WELS Proves the Answer is "No!"BBC News - Does con...":

The new age religion of self-esteem is only meant as a stepping stone to believing that men are gods. I've talked about this incident before: A few years ago a local WELS church hosted a children's play in which a young girl was trying to decide what she would do for a career. After much angst she slowly walked to the front of the stage and said, 'All I know is that as long as I listen to the small voice inside of me, I know I'll be making the right decision'. I looked around the packed auditorium hoping to register on the audience the same shock and disgust that I was experiencing - nope. They loved it. This was the same WELS church where the CDS principal's wife tried to practice Reiki on my wife's injured knee. My wife didn't know what she was doing as this woman rubbed her hands together and placed them over her knee. She said that she was harnessing the healing energy inside her and attempting to release it into her injured knee.

With the recent excommunication of faithful Christian and Pastor, Paul Rydecki from the WELS by District President Jon Buchholz it is clear that belief that they are gods has really taken hold.

Having abandoned the Scriptures and the Christian Book of Concord the Lutheran synods are rudderless and will continue down the path of the Roman Catholic Church as the world's denominations merge into the United Religions Initiative - the Lutheran slide being heavily greased by Thrivent. 


***

GJ - I told one non-Lutheran group, "Apply to Thrivent. They support any and all confessions, Unitarians too."

The Synodical Conference sects began in Pietism, as all the Lutheran groups did. Each one dealt with the Confessions in one way or another. 

Missouri began with lying about its own beginning and its sordid history. The celebration of Walther's 200th is a sad reminder of this mythology continuing.

In Perryville, where my classmate is mayor, they tell people that Bishop Stephan had three alternatives when the Walther mob kicked him out. They held a gun on him, so I can count only two alternatives - comply or die. 

But this story of three alternatives is repeated endlessly and piously. Otten recently repeated it in Christian News - so we know it is true, right?


Halle Pietism had no room for the Means of Grace, and rationalism soon invaded whatever remained of the Gospel. Knapp already had the Gospel converted to UOJ, and that was about 200 years ago. His crew trained Stephan, who trained Walther, who dominated the Synodical Conference as the expert on everything.



The Prosperity Gospel began in occult teaching, which Norman Vincent Peale plagiarized from another writer. Paul Y. Cho renewed it among Evangelicals and Pentecostals by blending his Korean occult religion with Christianity. He lectured at Fuller Seminary - and all the denominations ate it up.

When I attended Paul Kelm's evangelism seminar at Mequon, everything related to Fuller and Church Growth. One of the participants mentioned Cho with sighs and moans, the kind normally reserved for Walther in the LCMS. A WELS leader began another workshop by selling Cho books from a case he brought along.


A catalog of business and success tapes will show that many of them are directly related to such occult teachers as Napoleon Hill and Nightingale Conant. I noticed the same occult language in Mark and Avoid Jeske's alleged Time of Grace entertainment.

Robert Schuller won the Napoleon Hill Foundation Award one year, for advancing the philosophy or rather the anti-religion of Hill.

Therefore, when the pastors drop in a few key words about calling on the powers of the universe, as Jeske did, the businessmen light up and listen. "He is one of us." Not every businessman is one with The Force, but many are. This is an Age of Darkness.


Friday, January 4, 2013

Church of England ends ban on gay bishops - Yahoo! News



Church of England ends ban on gay bishops - Yahoo! News:


LONDON (Reuters) - The Church of England has lifted a ban on gay male clergy who live with their partners from becoming bishops on condition they pledge to stay celibate, threatening to reignite an issue that splits the 80-million-strong global Anglican community.
The issue of homosexuality has driven a rift between Western and African Anglicans since a Canadian diocese approved blessings for same-sex couples in 2002 and U.S. Anglicans in the Episcopal Churchappointed an openly gay man as a bishop in 2003.
The Church of England, struggling to remain relevant in modern Britain despite falling numbers of believers, is already under pressure after voting narrowly last November to maintain a ban on women becoming bishops.
The church said the House of Bishops, one of its most senior bodies, had ended an 18-month moratorium on the appointment of gays in civil partnerships as bishops.
The decision was made in late December but received little attention until the church confirmed it on Friday.
Gay clergy in civil partnerships would be eligible for the episcopate - the position of bishop - if they make the pledge to remain celibate, as is already the case for gay deacons and priests.
"The House has confirmed that clergy in civil partnerships, and living in accordance with the teaching of the Church on human sexuality, can be considered as candidates for the episcopate," the Bishop of Norwich Graham James said.
"The House believed it would be unjust to exclude from consideration for the episcopate anyone seeking to live fully in conformity with the Church's teaching on sexual ethics or other areas of personal life and discipline," he added in a statement on behalf of the House of Bishops.
The church teaches that couples can only have sex within marriage, and that marriage can only be between a man and a woman.
CONSERVATIVE OUTCRY
Britain legalized civil partnerships in 2005, forcing the church to consider how to treat clergy living in same-sex unions.
The church ruled that a civil partnership was not a bar to a clerical position, provided the clergy remained celibate, but failed to specifically address the issue of when the appointment was of a bishop.
In July 2011 the church launched a review to deal with this omission, at the same time imposing the moratorium on nominating gays in such partnerships as bishops while the study was conducted.
The review came a year after a gay cleric living in a civil partnership was reportedly blocked from becoming a bishop in south London.
It was the second setback for the cleric, Jeffrey John, who would already have become a bishop in 2003 but was forced to withdraw from the nomination after an outcry from church conservatives.
Rod Thomas, chairman of the conservative evangelical group Reform, said the church's move on gay bishops would provoke further dispute.
"It will be much more divisive than what we have seen over women bishops. If you thought that was a furor, wait to see what will happen the first time a bishop in a civil partnership is appointed," he told BBC television.
(Editing by Tom Pfeiffer)


'via Blog this'

---

solafide (http://solafide.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Church of England ends ban on gay bishops - Yahoo!...":

Coming soon to a WELS congregation near you!

The homo-erotic environment at MLC/LPS, MLC, and WLS are taking a toll.

WELS Proves the Answer is "No!"
BBC News - Does confidence really breed success?



BBC News - Does confidence really breed success?:


Does confidence really breed success?


A composite image showing (clockwise):  A woman powdering her face, a woman applying red lipstick, a woman looking at her own reflection in a window, a man pulling his muscles and a man wearing sunglasses with his collar turned up. All images THINKSTOCK
Research suggests that more and more American university students think they are something special. High self-esteem is generally regarded as a good thing - but could too much of it actually make you less successful?
About nine million young people have filled out the American Freshman Survey, since it began in 1966.
It asks students to rate how they measure up to their peers in a number of basic skills areas - and over the past four decades, there has been a dramatic rise in the number of students who describe themselves as being "above average" for academic ability, drive to achieve, mathematical ability and self-confidence.
This was revealed in a new analysis of the survey data, by US psychologist Jean Twenge and colleagues.
Graphic showing how the the percentage of American students rating themselves as "above average" has gone up. Measures shown: Drive to achieve, social self-confidence, intellectual self-confidence, leadership ability and writing ability
Self-appraisals of traits that are less individualistic - such as co-operativeness, understanding others and spirituality - saw little change, or a decrease, over the same period.

Self-esteem and confidence

Psychologists rarely use the word confidence. They have separate measures for:
  • self-esteem - the value people place on themselves
  • narcissism - definitions vary, but essentially a negative, destructive form of high self-esteem
  • self-efficacy - the ability to achieve personal goals
Twenge adds that while the Freshman Survey shows that students are increasingly likely to label themselves as gifted in writing ability, objective test scores indicate that actual writing ability has gone down since the 1960s.
And while in the late 1980s, almost half of students said they studied for six or more hours a week, the figure was little over a third by 2009 - a fact that sits rather oddly, given there has been a rise in students' self-proclaimed drive to succeed during the same period.
Another study by Twenge suggested there has been a 30% tilt towards narcissistic attitudes in US students since 1979.
The Oxford English Dictionary defines narcissism as: "Excessive self-love or vanity; self-admiration, self-centredness."
"Our culture used to encourage modesty and humility and not bragging about yourself," says Twenge. "It was considered a bad thing to be seen as conceited or full of yourself."

The Freshman Survey

Three female students
  • A nationally representative sample of first-year college and university students in the US
  • Conducted every year since 1966
  • Questions on a range of topics - including values, financial situation, and expectations of college
Not everyone with high self-esteem is a narcissist. Some positive views of the self may be harmless and in fact quite justified.
But one in four recent students responded to a questionnaire, the Narcissistic Personality Inventory, in a way which leaned towards narcissistic views of the self.
Though some have argued that narcissism is an essential trait, Twenge and her colleagues see it as negative and destructive.
In The Narcissism Epidemic, co-written with Keith Campbell, Twenge blames the growth of narcissistic attitudes on a range of trends - including parenting styles, celebrity culture, social media and access to easy credit, which allows people to appear more successful than they are.
"What's really become prevalent over the last two decades is the idea that being highly self-confident - loving yourself, believing in yourself - is the key to success.
"Now the interesting thing about that belief is it's widely held, it's very deeply held, and it's also untrue."

Find out more

This bewitching idea - that people's lives will improve with their self-esteem - led to what came to be known as The Self-Esteem Movement.
Legions of self-help books have propagated the idea that we each have it within us to achieve great things - we just need to be more confident.
Over 15,000 journal articles have examined the links between high self-esteem and measurable outcomes in real life, such as educational achievement, job opportunities, popularity, health, happiness and adherence to laws and social codes.
Yet there is very little evidence that raising self-esteem leads to tangible, positive outcomes.
"If there is any effect at all, it is quite small," says Roy Baumeister of Florida State University. He was the lead author of a 2003 paper that scrutinised dozens of self-esteem studies.

All about me, me, me...

  • In a recent paper Jean Twenge examined changes in pronoun use in American books published between 1960 and 2008, using the Google Books ngram database
  • She found that first person plural pronouns (we, us our etc.) decreased in use by 10% while first person singular pronouns (I, me, my etc.) increased in use by 42%
He found that although high self-esteem frequently had a positive correlation with success, the direction of causation was often unclear. For example, are high marks awarded to people with high self-esteem or does getting high marks engender high self-esteem?
And a third variable can influence both self-esteem and the positive outcome.
"Coming from a good family might lead to both high self-esteem and personal success," says Baumeister.
"Self-control is much more powerful and well-supported as a cause of personal success. Despite my years invested in research on self-esteem, I reluctantly advise people to forget about it."

Am I a narcissist?

Close-up of a woman wearing red lipstick
The Narcissistic Personality Inventory asks 40 questions, then ranks you on a narcissism scale
This doesn't mean that under-confident people will be more successful in school, in their careers or in sport.
"You need to believe that you can go out and do something but that's not the same as thinking that you're great," says Twenge. She gives the example of a swimmer attempting to learn a turn - this person needs to believe that they can acquire that skill, but a belief that they are already a great swimmer does not help.
Forsyth and Kerr studied the effect of positive feedback on university students who had received low grades (C, D, E and F). They found that the weaker students actually performed worse if they received encouragement aimed at boosting their self-worth.
"An intervention that encourages [students] to feel good about themselves, regardless of work, may remove the reason to work hard," writes Baumeister.
So do young people think they are better than they are?
If they are, perhaps the appropriate response is not condemnation but pity.
The narcissists described by Twenge and Campbell are often outwardly charming and charismatic. They find it easy to start relationships and have more confidence socially and in job interviews. Yet their prognosis is not good.

How self-esteem become a movement

Werner Erhard
  • The Self-Esteem Movement is said to have its roots in the civil rights movement, which promoted group solidarity - but also the rights of individuals to be who they want
  • A series of seminars were held in the 1960s on achieving happiness and fulfilment by tapping inner potential - it was called The Human Potential Movement
  • First popular book on self-esteem published in 1969 - The Psychology of Self-Esteem by psychologist Nathaniel Branden
  • Werner Erhard (above) held sessions aimed at boosting self-esteem in US prisons in the 1970s - there were similar programmes in the 1980s to try to reduce teen pregnancy rates and crime
  • Interest is still high - there were more than 40,000 articles about self-esteem in newspapers and magazines between 2002 and 2007
"In the long-term, what tends to happen is that narcissistic people mess up their relationships, at home and at work," says Twenge.
Narcissists may say all the right things but their actions eventually reveal them to be self-serving.
As for the narcissists themselves, it often not until middle age that they notice their life has been marked by an unusual number of failed relationships.
But it's not something that is easy to fix - narcissists are notorious for dropping out of therapy.
"It's a personality trait," says Twenge. "It's by definition very difficult to change. It's rooted in genetics and early environment and culture and things that aren't all that malleable."
Things also don't look good for the many young people who - although not classed as narcissists - have a disproportionately positive self-view.
2006 study led by John Reynolds of Florida State University found that students are increasingly ambitious, but also increasingly unrealistic in their expectations, creating what he calls "ambition inflation".
"Since the 1960s and 1970s, when those expectations started to grow, there's been an increase in anxiety and depression," says Twenge.
"There's going to be a lot more people who don't reach their goals."


'via Blog this'

***

GJ - My response to a reader, whose name I just forgot -


When I joined WELS, all I heard was how superior their education was. They even imagined that was a great reason to join. There still is a constant stream of stories (from them alone) of how much better they are, how dumb and poorly educated the LCMS guys are.
One of the readers was a WELS teacher. She said the children of WELS leaders had to receive high grades, no matter how poorly they performed in class. She thought it was hilarious that I pointed out their mistakes with the Latin (sic), which only means - "thus" - not my typo. I learned over and over that this enraged the WELS pastors. One wrote, "I never want to see another sic again.
The seminary professors and DPs prove that being stupid is a career advantage, that pretending to be dull and forgetful is a good substitute for raw ignorance.
The systemic bullying and abuse in the WELS system is going to lead to more tragedies. I do not know how many murders, adulteries, and child attacks are needed to wake up the membership.
Some teachers are excellent, but they will be replaced with synodical dullards. The worse things get, the more they need an amen corner in every WELS institution.

---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "WELS Proves the Answer is "No!"BBC News - Does con...":

Ichabod -

When I read the title of this blog article; my mind recalled a Shakespeare line:

"I do hate a proud man as I hate the engendering of toads."

Also, I thought of the German adage [translated into English]:

"Self-praise stinks."

Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org
www.moralmatters.org