Friday, November 19, 2021

No Excuses - People Have To Find Out for Themselves



KJV 17:11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

The second edition has a lot of new material because a number of people (no pastors) sent recommendations for additional study. A great source - Pickering - I have used that author a lot.

One person sent (in a plastic bag) Which Bible? The author (Davis Otis Fuller) has two other books out there, and I just ordered one of them. I bought a newer copy of Which Bible? but thought about how much reading caused it to lose its binding entirely. 

Such are the rare books that comprehend the issues concerning the modern text critics and the bad paraphrases promoted as translations (a big raspberry to Eugene Nida). 

As others have stated, almost the entire Evangelical establishment has gone over to the NIV-ESV-RSV side, which removes (not in unison) many verses from the New Testament. Many more verses are deliberately distorted, though one again - not in agreement. The true ending of Mark has gone up and down like creaky old elevator in a decaying library. 

"It's in the sub-basement."

"It's back in Mark 16, with a big space and a vague claim that it does not belong there."

"It was sent back with a little known shorter ending of Mark, which proves that the short ending cried out for a good ending." (Really?)

I laugh about the "conservative" Lutherans who have made a big deal about being in a state of confession, in statu confessionis - for those who took Latin 101. They bought the new Bibles and sold the new hymnals, and now they are closing congregations right and left. Sect President Mark Schroeder, who caved on the New NIV in WELS, wrote a three-hanky weeper about a parish in Milwaukee that lasted about 60 years, leaving its assets to the same sect that abandoned the marks of Lutheran doctrine. Why not donate the liquidation money directly to Fuller Seminary? 

Seminarians and college students bent on wasting $80,000 on a liberal Calvinist education - look at that Greek New Testament they sell, promote, and defend. Calm down - I have one too. But I also have a Westcott-Hot* and a Byzantine (Stephanos). *Hot is the new designation for Hort, since he was hotter than Georgia asphalt for every ridiculous corruption in the fraudulent codices from Rome and Eastern Orthodoxy.

The late Kurt Aland, the genius behind your precious college and seminary Greek New Testament, denied the apostolic origin of the New Testament. His second wife took over his empire, so I doubt that their institute will change direction. Eugene Nida was involved in the texts too, always on the wrong side of everything.

I know some quasi-Lutheran readers are secret papists, longing for union with Rome, willing to throw their arms on the chest of Pope Francis, SJ, weeping, hoping that the terms of reconciliation will be merciful. Most people do not realize that Rome has been a part of the American Bible Society and the United Bible Societies for the longest time. They have no use for the KJV, but they have nothing but warmth for Rome being happy with their joint efforts. "2000 years of grace, as the Holy Father says, chuckling."

The various Lutheran groups, whether ELCA or ELDONA, are burdened by those who cling to Rome and Eastern Orthodoxy, thanks to warped seminary faculty members. The clergy know next to nothing about the Bible but will go all woke on someone not knowing the fine points of smells and bells dogma. Just as it happened in England, the clergy obsessed with high church finery are dumber than rocks about Biblical doctrine.

The lay members have the chance to renew reading of the genuine text of the Bible. Anything less will take us back to the corruption of the Jerome Vulgate and the Apocrypha. Ever notice which clergy promote the Apocrypha? I wonder if they have the Rosary in their nasty pockets.

 Your synod's favorite Bible is an Ikea product, pieced together with scraps, yet priced like it is the first edition of Shakespeare.



Thursday, November 18, 2021

One Little Fact Destroys the Modern Greek New Testament, Snip and Clip Effort

 

 Metzger listed all his honors, memberships, talks, but downplays the fact that he married the boss's daughter, whose daddy was Princeton University's president at the time. I am not complaining, just explaining.

The oldest manuscripts of the New Testament are best, right? Actually, no, because heresies were rife in the Egyptian area until around 200 AD. 

The most likely way to corrupt a manuscript is to erase/omit a word or phrase. 

One is an oddity, 1 Timothy 3:16, a very important passage since it seems to be Paul repeating what is already known, a hymn or creed or both combined.

The vast majority of all the witnesses read "God" while a handful have the word as "who." That could come from wear or fading of the letter making the word for "God" turn into "who."

I will go into the dark recesses of the scriptorum where these are kept and contrast the two versions.

+++

KJV 1 Timothy 3:16

 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. (Vast majority of old texts.)

NIV 1 Timothy 3:16

16 Beyond all question, the mystery from which true godliness springs is great:

He appeared in the flesh,

    was vindicated by the Spirit,[a]

was seen by angels,

    was preached among the nations,

was believed on in the world,

    was taken up in glory.

ESV 1 Timothy 3:16

16 Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness:

He was manifested in the flesh,

    vindicated[b] by the Spirit,[c]

        seen by angels,

proclaimed among the nations,

    believed on in the world,

        taken up in glory.

Stephanus Byzantine 1 Timothy 3:16

16 και ομολογουμενως μεγα εστιν το της ευσεβειας μυστηριον θεος εφανερωθη εν σαρκι εδικαιωθη εν πνευματι ωφθη αγγελοις εκηρυχθη εν εθνεσιν επιστευθη εν κοσμω ανεληφθη εν δοξη

Westcott-Hort 1 Timothy 3:16

16 και ομολογουμενως μεγα εστιν το της ευσεβειας μυστηριον ος εφανερωθη εν σαρκι εδικαιωθη εν πνευματι ωφθη αγγελοις εκηρυχθη εν εθνεσιν επιστευθη εν κοσμω ανελημφθη εν δοξη

+++

 Wheaton College's Dr. Moo helped the Sausage Factory accept the New NIV. They already longed for its pathetic and erroneous paraphrases. Moo  gave the impression of scholarship rather than salesmanship

 Rupert Murdoch ended up owning the NIV, which is heavily and shamelessly marketed but no threat to the KJV. WELS pastors call it the Nineveh paraphrase.

Do you want his lizard hands on your Bible?

The KJV is the best translation and is also best testified by the vast majority of Greek manuscripts. Ever since Westcott-Hot, the modernists have been keen to remove that powerful word - God - and to water it down to who on the strength of dubious evidence found only a few times - and not from reliable sources.

The New KJV footnotes "God" with "who" Nestle-Aland-United Bible Societies aka NU. That is virtue signaling among the modern translations. "We know you hillbillies want it with KJV precision and honesty, but we have to show up at deluxe Biblical conferences knowing the rest will judge us on our fidelity to Westcott-Hort and Count Tischendorf."

PS - Westcott-Hot was a typo the first time, but then I decided the name just begs for that alteration. Whatever is ridiculous and dishonest invites a dash of humor. Oh? you missed the Westcott-Hot? You could be hired to be on the next next commissions to revise and correct and improve the ESV-NIV-RSV-NRSV-NKJV.

 Mequon's feeble-minded faculty went all out to force the New NIV on the sect. They won, WELS lost.

 WELSians, do you want your Bible to be invented from a piece of this and a piece of that, reminding you of a famous movie - Frankenstein? That is your New NIV, even worse than the old one. Have you bought your new WELS hymnal with 25 new Calvinist hymns in it? You soon will - and the official Biblical text is the New NIV.

Wednesday, November 17, 2021

Ambiguous Fall Weather and - the Appetite

One things leads to another. Her love for a little ice cream had a strong effect on me - "just a little vanilla..."

Suddenly our warm days have become wintery and are suggesting rain for the next week. One reader asked about more on nutrition, so I will offer some experience.

The irony of appetite is that the more we crave, the stronger are the danger signs. Diabetics and pre-diabetics crave sugar and related carbos, usually the simple ones that challenge insulin more. Eating lots of candy all day, starting the day with ice cream - those are bad signs. 

However, the good news is that gradually reducing portions, desserts, evil snack foods, and poor food choices will decrease craving for those foods. I had two days when I indulged in ice cream and felt horrible, and when I had an annual donut binge - even worse. I use those memories to stay away from ice cream and donuts.

We all know crash diets work for a short time and make matters worse afterwards. This time I tried a slow replacement of desserts with oranges and walnuts. Oranges satisfy the need for sugars and walnuts quell hunger while helping the heart. 

I have been gradually increasing time at Planet Fitness, not trying for Charles Atlas (remember him?) in a few weeks. One expert says weight loss comes down to four words - more movement, less food. 

Sassy and I are regulars with eggs, either for breakfast or lunch. She works me over - and her special friends - for treats. Her game is to eat her Moist and Meaty throughout the day, with a few Pupperonis each time. She did this by placing her front paws on each side of the filled bowl and looking up at me. Her second approach is to walk into the kitchen, sit down, and smile. If she looks solemn, I ask her about treats until she smiles.

She and I take one or two walks a day. That is the single most important exercise for all of us. We often see neighbors and talk to them. I seldom see walkers, except at Planet Fitness, where they walk with speed and determination.



Why Are So-Called Conservative Lutheran Seminaries Charging Exorbitant Fees for Teaching ELCA Dogma and Practice?

 

 Seminaries are literally seed-beds for young minds aiming at the ministry. Why give them weed seeds?

The new edition of The Bible Book: The KJV Reborn for Those Who Love the Word of God should light up the dimwits who pretend to lead and teach but only follow ELCA like lonely puppies.

The inglorious Preus revolution was a scam. They drove out Objective Justification master Jungkuntz so Robert and Jack Preus could polish their OJ in their new political roles. The biggest liars left and Seminex took over Missouri, WELS, and the Little Sect on the Prairie. They all pretended to have rescued their synods while making everything worse.

The apostasy took two channels - one to STS high church smells-and-bellsdom. The best hideout for an unbeliever is to spend his time getting measured for even more expensive robes and equipment. No wonder so many pope and go to Rome, semi-pope to Eastern Orthodoxy, or stay to ruin Lutheran doctrine and worship completely.

The other channel was Church Growth, which is a great way to burn money, make a lot of noise, and chase women. Their precious charts now look like the ski jumps at Snowbird - except for tumbling instead of soaring at the end.

The Bible teaches only one thing - faith in Jesus Christ - and the combined, conservative faithless seminaries cannot get that across. The faculty members are unbelievers, politicians who knew how to get a cushy job without irritating too many people. The students are victims of high tuition and the opposite of education. What they learned in church, enough to make them want to be pastors, is unlearned with great skill in sarcasm, humor, turning bums like Barth, Tillich, and Bultmann into seminary heroes. 

Does it bother anyone that so many Seminex graduates became ELCA bishops? The Missouri DP in New York became the ELCA bishop for the state. That is either comedy or tragedy.

The president of Mequon studied at Fuller Seminary and lied about it, but his gushy essay on Church Growth reeked of it - and he admitted the truth to friends.


The president of each seminary could get rid of all the modern Bibles with one little lesson. The RSV, NRSV, NIV, ESV, and others are based upon sterile parents, Aleph and Vaticanus, with no clear orgin and no children. Put away your Westcott-Hort, Nestle, Aland, and Nida - common sense will teach all but the densest. 

Ignoring the fact that both are fakes, and the Church of Rome has produced many of those, the funniest being the Donation of Constantine. During a pledge drive, people were putting their pledges in the plate, so Constantine put in his slip marked "Europe" and gave it all to the Church. That is the history class joke.

 Let's do another book from Genesis 19.

So, ignoring how utterly fake Aleph and Vaticanus are, or even allowing they are the best and purest, as Hort declared, answer this riddle - "Why did Aleph and Vaticanus not get copied if they were so good, so pure, so earth-shattering?" 

Answer - heretical and fake copies have appeared, but they did not multiply since the Christian Church of believers (not like the phonies of today) copied the good templates and kept up that practice until we had about 7,000 pieces of evidence with 90% or more belonging to the Majority Text aka Traditional aka Byzantine aka Ecclesiastical aka Textus Receptus.

If Sinaiticus really sat around for 1500 years, why was it a solo work with about 40% contradictions from Vaticanus? 

The Byzantine or Majority Text can now be traced back to the earliest days from quotations in the church fathers and similar sources. That means there was a continuous transmission from the Apostolic Age to now, while the Westcott-Hort darlings are sterile and questionable.

So the "conservative" seminaries are doing the work of Tischendorf and Westcott-Hort and making their money with one of the greatest confidence schemes of all times. No wonder Bernie Madoff (who made off with billions) thought we were easy marks. Our pew copies of the NIV, ESV, and RSV prove it how gullible, weak, and submissive the "conservative" pastors are. 

 Turkeys of a feather squawk together.

This New Section Sets the Table for The Bible Book:
The KJV Reborn for Those Who Love the Word of God

 


Required Reading: The Gospels of Mark and John and the Text

 

Crucial for Understanding the Radical Academic Shift to Apostasy

            Most believers are not aware of the historic radical Biblical scholars using the Gospels of Mark and John to advance their theories and deny the Scriptural truth. Pietism, with its emphasis on cooperation rather than doctrine, helped rationalism begin to flourish, at Halle University and other places. The famous Reimarus Fragments were printed anonymously to deny the miracles of the Bible, among other things. The Gospel of John was dismissed as belonging to an era three centuries after Christ. That claim allowed the academics to disregard any support in the Fourth Gospel regarding historical and doctrinal information. In fact, they hated the open Trinitarian nature of John’s Gospel, the clear identification of Jesus as the only-begotten Son of God, His Virgin Birth, Resurrection, and Ascension. They considered Jesus to be a wandering teacher who inspired love, caused emotional healings, and never considered Himself the Messiah, Savior, or Son of God.

            With the Fourth Gospel out of the way in the quest for the historical Jesus, the academics could turn Mark’s Gospel into that kernel of truth they were seeking, the story of Jesus without the divine or miraculous. The Westcott-Hort Greek New Testament removed “the Son of God” from Mark 1:1.

W-H Mark 1:1 αρχη του ευαγγελιου ιησου χριστουThe beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

KJV – Mark 1:1 The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God;

The Westcott-Hort also stopped the Gospel at Mark 16:8, with the rest of the chapter closed off in square brackets to show that the traditional ending did not really belong. This editing of the Greek text, with no support for these actions, reduced the divinity of Christ in Mark 1:1 and erased His resurrection in Mark 16. A century after Wescott-Hort, the first RSV edition dropped the ending of Mark into a footnote and later raised it up with a space between verse 8 and 9 to show that the ending was foreign.

            The changes in Mark’s Gospel made it easier to write about the undiscovered primitive version, the kernel, the story of a popular teacher. Humorously, because Biblical experts often weave strange fantasies, the academics postulated Q, the imaginary source shared between Matthew and Luke, because those two Gospels had so much in common with each other. However, nothing like Q has ever been found. Theories build slowly and often fade slowly. The least likely view, the minority perspective has the Gospels written by the Apostles Matthew and John and by associates of Apostles Mark and Luke, inspired by the Holy Spirit.

            The Gospel of John is still removed far from the time of Jesus. In 1975, at Notre Dame, Elisabeth Schuessler-Fiorenza stated, “The Gospel of John was written in the first century by the Apostle, according to conservatives, 300 years later – according to liberals.” She is still teaching, at Harvard Divinity School. For most Biblical scholars with an academic position, the Bible is just a book to be treated like other books, with lengthy analysis and competing arguments. Their values are strictly rationalistic, and their tolerance for traditional Christian professors is zero, including the issue of the text itself.

            The Christian Church once handled the teaching of Biblical doctrine and the printing of the KJV, but now the Scriptures are dominated by the extreme Left and Bibles are printed and promoted by a variety of profitable businesses. College and seminary professors are products and promoters of rationalistic views and opponents of the King James Version. Faculty are happy to be named as consultants for the latest, most readable, least demanding Bible. The denomination will not give them free trips to Israel, but the Bible factory will.[1]

            I remember, as a lad, hearing the excitement about the RSV being a new, exciting modern version of the Bible, then learning the Virgin Birth was denied in Isaiah 7:10. Much later I studied in the RSV Room, the reading room of Yale Divinity School, where the RSV was developed. No one wants to mention that the Left-wing National Council of Churches owns the copyright for the RSV. The alleged new improved ESV is printed under license from the NCC, a fact not promoted by the sellers or readers of the Bible.

            The engine behind the repudiation of the KJV is really the monopoly established by Bible text critics. Westcott-Hort began the consolidation with their own Greek New Testament, which seemed to fail, but the modernists ascended in the 1930s and never let go.[2] The Biblical text, especially the New Testament Greek, has been a playground for apostates ever since, and a fall-back position for anyone accused of teaching liberal notions. They cry out, in unison, “The Bible did not float down from heaven. It was made and transmitted by man.”[3]



[1] The Southern Baptists voted to forbid their chain of stores from displaying the newest NIV, only allowing individual orders sub rosa. The stores said, No, they will sell the 2011 NIV anyway https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2012/february/lifeway-declines-sbc-request-to-bar-niv-from-stores.html

 

[2] My first Greek New Testament was a Westcott-Hort. I have a Byzantine (Majority or KJV text), a United Bible Society GNT, and a Westcott-Hort, all in perfect condition. Westcott-Hort is also part of the Bible Gateway website, which I use daily.

[3] No one has ever claimed that the Bible floated down from heaven. However, God has miraculously preserved His Word, as proven by the dominance of the KJV today, 70 years after the National Council of Churches birthed the RSV and later the ESV and New RSV.


Tuesday, November 16, 2021

Why Are the LCMS-WELS-ELS-ELCA Enterprises Failing So Rapidly?
The Vast Majority of Bible Readers Favor the KJV Over the Cool Paraphrases.
Was Church Growth Simply Another Smoke Screen?

 


WELS and Missouri are probably disturbed that I knew so much about their bedmates in the LCA before I left.

The result of our Grand Tour of Synods - LCA, LCMS, WELS, ELS, CLC (sic), and a pinch of ELDONA - is a comprehensive knowledge of the main players, face to face, at meetings, at conferences. 

They did not all dump the KJV, the liturgy, Means of Grace worship, and pant for Church Growth by accident. Those were leaders who could not lead six drunks to the men's room at Hooters. Their spines were - and are - made of rubber, and their mouths are full of lies.

WELS put on the ultimate GA deception, pretend to be horribly retro while aping the LCA/ELCA 100%. I made sure Christian News ran the Snowbird article showing Chilstrom, Mischke, and Bohlmann as "leaders conferring." Naturally, WELS lied about the conference, just as they did about Archbishop Weakland later. 

 Someone really likes this photo, but I can't/won't remember who.

I figure the cool guys, like Wayne Mueller and John Lawrenz, and their counterparts in the LCMS-ELS-CLC keyed on the LCA/ELCA leaders and followed that lead. I think it was more a rejection of the truth than a desire to bring their sects into the 20th century. LB/AAL/Thrivent paved the way with loot for the leaders and programs from Fuller and Planned Parenthood.

What do they all have in common, besides throwing shade on the KJV and TLH whenever they can? They loathe Luther. They despise the Book of Concord, and they know nothing about either one.

 Yoder and Hesburgh in the same photo:
I have been places.

The LCMS seminaries are teaching the younguns to be Catholic priests, and the rest are teaching praise band mummery. Smells and bells are not the antidote for praise bands, they are just another version of entertainment evangelism (ala Fuller, Willow Creek, Glende-Ski).

People are witnessing a vast denominational movement into complete apostasy and catastrophic failure. There are many solutions. I bought a book and found out there is another seminary in Ft. Wayne. It looks as Lutheran as Mequon but they keep their clothes on. There are many more examples.

I am quite sure all the radicals will own the property and funds in the near future, but that will not help them.

 I never went to Fuller, but I did spend $35 on the sweatshirt. I wore it to a WELS shindig, and pastors glared at me. I explained, "I am just trying fit in with WELS."

WELS Damage to Biblical Truths Is Far Worse Than People Recognize and the Sect Admits


Thank you WELS for the graphic showing the style of Bible loved by WELS-LCMS-ELDONA. ELS-WELS teaches against the Majority Text and argue for the Westcott-Hort-Nestle-Aland snip and clip Bibles - NIV, ESV, NRSV, etc.

“The first decided steps, however, toward giving to the English nation a Bible printed in their own tongue, were the translations of the Gospels of Matthew and Mark, made by William Tyndale, and by him printed at Hamburg, in the year 1524; --  and a translation of the whole of the New Testament, printed by him partly at Cologne, and partly at Worms, in 1525.”

Alexander McClure, The Translators Revived, Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry, p. 6.

+++

“Why is accuracy of translation so important? Because the Bible is the Word of the living God. It is an utterly unique book. It is the inscripturated revelation to mankind of God’s mind and will and the inspired record of His redemptive work. And this being so, there is no more important piece of literature in the world. Thus, the accuracy of the Bible’s translation is of the utmost importance.”

Robert Martin, Accuracy of Translation, The Banner of Truth Trust, 1989, p. 2.

+++

“Omission of material found in the Authorised Version (AV) is the main type of alteration found in the modern versions. The New Testament of one popular modern version, the New International Version (NIV), first published in 1973, omits seventeen complete verses found in the AV—a figure found applicable to most modern versions.”

David Blunt, Which Bible Version: Does It Really Matter? Trinitarian Bible Society, 2007, p. 3.

+++

Dr. Aland’s Influence on the New International Version

“Dr. Aland’s pernicious views of the unreliability of our Bibles in the original manuscripts is profoundly seen in the NIV Bible. The same hand that would excise whole books of the Bible from our Canon would also excise many, many texts.”

Hembd, What Today’s Christian Needs to Know about Dr. Kurt Aland, Trinitarian Bible Society, 2007, p. 11f.0




Partial Preface to the Original King James Version of the Bible

 




• 22 It is not only an armour, but also a whole armoury of weapons, both offensive and defensive; whereby we may save ourselves and put the enemy to flight.

• 23 It is not an herb, but a tree, or rather a whole paradise of trees of life, which bring forth fruit every month, and the fruit thereof is for meat, and the leaves for medicine.

• 24 It is not a pot of Manna, or a cruse of oil, which were for memory only, or for a meal's meat or two, but as it were a shower of heavenly bread sufficient for a whole host, be it never so great; and as it were a whole cellar full of oil vessels; whereby all our necessities may be provided for and our debts discharged.

• 25 In a word, it is a panary ((bread Pantry)) of wholesome food, against fenowed [mouldy.] traditions; a physician's shop [κοινον ιατρειον. S.Basil. in Psal.primum.] (Saint Basil calleth it) of preservatives against poisoned heresies; a pandect ((a complete body)) of profitable laws against rebellious spirits; a treasury of most costly jewels against beggarly rudiments; finally, a fountain of most pure water springing up unto everlasting life.

• 26 And what marvel? the original thereof being from heaven, not from earth; the author being God, not man; the inditer, the Holy Spirit, not the wit of the Apostles or Prophets; the penmen, such as were sanctified from the womb, and endued with a principal portion of God's Spirit; the matter, verity, piety, purity, uprightness; the form, God's word, God's testimony, God's oracles, the word of truth, the word of salvation, etc.; the effects, light of understanding, stableness of persuasion, repentance from dead works, newness of life, holiness, peace, joy in the Holy Ghost; lastly, the end and reward of the study thereof, fellowship with the Saints, participation of the heavenly nature, fruition of an inheritance immortal, undefiled, and that never shall fade away.

• 27 Happy is the man that delighteth in the Scripture, and thrice happy that meditateth in it day and night.


Harvard University's Book on The Literary Guide to the Bible - KJV!

 

 Harvard picked the KJV for its literary guide.

“We have as a rule used the King James Version in translations, and our reasons for doing so must be obvious: it is the version most English readers associated with the literary qualities of the Bible, and it is till arguably the version that best preserves the literary effects of the original languages.”

The Literary Guide to the Bible, edited by Robert Alter and Frank Kermod, Harvard University Press, 1987, p. 7.



The First Thing I Noticed - Two Typos

 

 Steal a forgery and make the Tsar pay for it, then get Britain to pay Stalin for it.

 "Aleph, a fraud, a blatant fraud.
B, the Vaticanus twin..."


 Tischendorf just had too many co-inky-dinks in his narrative to be believed.

Last night, I was getting a little tired after a day of correcting and improving The Bible Book. I was sipping Brazilian coffee, pour-over of course, and looking at posts. I discovered two typos right away. I missed the "e" on one, literally on the number one, and a beginning quotation mark. I said to Sassy, "What a world! What a world!" I had just finished looking for a source, which was on Google, not in the leaflet I was reading.

Thus my little digression on typos. They multiply with age, like those skin anomalies that keep my dermatologist well fed.

The dramatic part of all this is not only a greater appreciation for the King James Version, but also an unraveling of the Great Codex Fraud. We have two giant codices (codex = bound book), Aleph and Vaticanus, vellum (skin) and bound, neither one having a definite birth or any children. The person connected to two of great codices is Count Tischendorf, really the Count Dracula of text studies, sneaking around, draining the blood of innocent people at night, feeding his ego.

Let me rehearse the story of the "finding" of Sinaiticus in or around a monastery library. 

  1. Tischendof found a basket of codex pages (unbound!), a portion of the "world's oldest Bible" destined for the fire.
  2. The fire might have been for warming the library or just for burning the garbage. Scholars are divided, since animal skin (vellum) does not burn well and scholars do not destroy ancient books.
  3. He rescued them, created a self-glorifying book about them, and named them after his Roman Catholic sponsor and king.
  4. He came back much later and took the rest of Aleph to the Tsars for "copying" and kept it there. In reality, #3 and #4 are called "stealing" in the Ten Commandments.
  5. A known forger said Aleph was his own work, created for the Tsar but artificially aged. Several early witnesses said the "world's oldest Bible" had white skin and was supple - pretty amazing for 1500 years. Like Madonna's skin, it does not bear a close examination.
  6. Tischendorf also got to see and write about Codex Vaticanus.
  7. Aleph and Vaticanus became the excuse for replacing the Majority (Traditional, Byzantine, Textus Receptus, Ecclesiatical) Text with the patchwork (now called eclectic) Westcott-Hort text.
  8. Westcott-Hort, like Tischendorf, were sneaky liars who forced their own text on the 1881 KJV revision, overall a failure but 50 years later the new way to publish the Greek New Testament. All the colleges and seminaries follow Westcott-Hort in the name of Nestle-Aland, the modern stooges.
  9. All objections to this con job have been silenced under a blanket of personal attacks.
  10. The modern text critics ignore dealing with this swindle and praise each other, but the overwhelming majority of Bible readers still use the King James Version. 

Westcott-Hort came up with their own patchwork or "eclectic" Greek New Testament, basically the one all Lutheran college and seminary students use. TLH used the KJV, but the newest WELS worship book is all New NIV.

 This is how the WELS New NIV was snipped and clipped together, so they warned members about snip and clip Bibles! Those guys are so much fun when they are drinking, which is most of the time.


Monday, November 15, 2021

So Much Fun Today

 

 TBS Facebook Page

One reader really likes the Icha-peek post, the last one before bedtime. I had a great day today, enjoying beautiful sunshine and working on The Bible Book.

I decided I would work on the book primarily and subordinate everything else. The Military Gardening Group gathered late in the day to enjoy the garden in almost 70 degree weather. We had Italian chicken and Southern biscuits. 

Our painter neighbor came by and I gave him one Queen Elizabeth rose and two Enchanted Peace roses for his wife. She loves roses.

I worked on adding more quotations about appreciating the KJV, which I posted below. Cue superfluous link for the KJV quotations, just to increase views.

I was very impressed with the Trinitarian Bible Society material, so I joined. I will be posting their eloquent defense of the KJV. 

Now I am going to listen to Letis, who studied under Edward Freer Hills.


 Theodore P. Letis


A More Complete List of Quotations about the Value of the King James Version of the Bible

 


Alister McGrath

"Aiming at truth, they achieved what later generations recognized as beauty and elegance." Alister McGrath, In the Beginning, p. 254.

+++

From Christian History Institute[1]

“ENGLAND HAS TWO BOOKS: the Bible and Shakespeare. England made Shakespeare, but the Bible made England.” — Victor Hugo (1802–1885)

George Bernard Shaw

“The translation was extraordinarily well done ­because to the translators what they were translating was not merely a curious collection of ancient books written by different authors indifferent stages of culture, but the word of God divinely revealed through His chosen and expressly inspired scribes. In this conviction they carried out their work with boundless reverence and care and achieved a beautifully artistic result . . . they made a translation so magnificent that to this day the common human Britisher or citizen of the United States of North America ­accepts and worships it as a single book by a single author, the book being the Book of Books and the author being God.” — George Bernard Shaw (1856–1950) Quoted in G. S. Paine, The Men Behind the King James Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1959, 1977), pp. 182–183



H. L. Menken, Famous Journalist and Agnostic

“It is the most beautiful of all the translations of the Bible; indeed, it is probably the most beautiful piece of writing in all the literature of the world. Many attempts have been made to purge it of its errors and obscurities. An English Revised Version was published in 1885 and an American Revised Version in 1901, and since then many learned but misguided men have sought to produce translations that should be mathematically accurate, and in the plain speech of everyday. But the Authorized Version has never yielded to any of them, for it is palpably and overwhelmingly better than they are, just as it is better than the Greek New Testament, or the Vulgate, or the Septuagint. Its English is extraordinarily simple, pure, eloquent, lovely. It is a mine of lordly and incomparable poetry, at once the most stirring and the most touching ever heard of.” — H. L. Mencken (1880-1956).

+++

From HolyBible.org

Winston Churchill

"The scholars who produced this masterpiece are mostly unknown and unremembered. But they forged an enduring link, literary and religious, between the English-speaking people of the world." The King James Bible Translators; Olga S. Opfell; Jefferson and London: McFarland, 1982.

+++

Compton’s Encyclopedia, Online Edition.

"One of the supreme achievements of the English Renaissance came at its close, in the King James Bible...It is rightly regarded as the most influential book in the history of English civilization...the King James Version combined homely, dignified phrases into a style of great richness and loveliness. It has been a model of writing for generations of English-speaking people."

+++

Downloaded from America Online, May 26, 1995.

"The greatest English Bible is the Authorized, or King James, Version. Based on Tyndale's translation and original texts, it was produced in 1611 by six groups of churchmen at the command of King James I. The King James Bible became the traditional Bible of English-speaking Protestants. Its dignified and beautiful style strongly influenced the development of literature in the English language. The influence can be seen in the works of John Bunyan, John Milton, Herman Melville, and many other writers."

Volume 3; Crowell-Collier Educational Corporation; 1967, 1972 ed. p.p. 137, 138 Rev. Holt H. Graham; Rev. Joseph M. Petulla; Mr. Cecil Roth.



+++

Charlton Heston

In the Arena: An Autobiography, pp. 554-555.

"...the King James translation has been described as 'the monument of English prose' as well as 'the only great work of art ever created by a committee'. Both statements are true. Fifty-four scholars worked seven years to produce the work from its extant texts in Aramaic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin, and English. Such an undertaking can be expected to produce great scholarship, but hardly writing as spare and sublime as the King James....

“The authors of several boring translations that have followed over the last fifty years mumble that the KJV is "difficult" filled with long words. Have a look at the difficult long words that begin the Old Testament, and end the Gospels: 'In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; darkness was upon the face of the deep.' and 'Now, of the other things which Jesus did, if they should be written every one, I suppose the world itself could not contain the books that would be written.' Shakespeare aside, there's no comparable writing in the language, as has been observed by wiser men than I.

Over the past several centuries it's been the single book in most households, an enormous force in shaping the development of the English language. Carried around the world by missionaries, it provided the base by which English is about to become the lingua franca of the world in the next century. Exploring it during this shoot [Ten Commandments] was one of the most rewarding creative experiences of my life."

+++

Theodore P. Letis

“Moreover, those clergy who have obediently fallen in line with the New Tradition have sent a clear signal to their parishioners and colleagues that, unlike William Tyndale, they no long find the verbal view of inspiration compelling.”

The Ecclesiastical Text: Text Criticism, Biblical Authority, and the Popular Mind, 1997.

 


+++

Trinitarian Bible Society

“The Authorised Version translators continued in the textual tradition which the church had used and accepted for hundreds of years. In doing so, they continued the solidarity of both original language texts and also of Earlier English translations upon which they based their work.”

The Authorised Version: What Today’s Christian Needs To Know about the Authorised (King James) Version, 2012, p. 2.

 

TBS – The Excellence of the Authorised Version

"The conspicuous merits of the ‘new version’ of 1611 gradually gained recognition. It was not only pronounced more scholarly, but it was found to be more readable than any other English translation of the Scriptures. Many of the changes incorporated in the Authorised Version were not designed to give a new meaning to the Scriptures, but to express the old meaning in another way, for the sake of literary improvement.

Changes were made to make the English agree better with the truth of the original, but far more were made for the sake of good, plain English and pleasant cadence in reading. The translators introduced a sweeter, smoother and more stately diction into our English Bible, and this was a great gain.

Public reading

The English Bible is designed for public reading, and whatever makes it read more smoothly, and in a style of pathos or majesty more accordant with its subject matter, is a help to the reader and a benefit to the hearer. The statements of the Bible that bear on our conduct and comfort, on our salvation and sanctification, are meant to be remembered, so as to be present in our minds whenever temptations or afflictions come our way. Whatever choice or arrangement of words makes these statements of the Bible more striking or more impressive, more pleasant to the ear, or more fascinating to the imagination, makes them also more easily remembered, and more potent for good.

It is not enough that our English Bible be a mathematically correct translation from the original Scriptures, word for word, point for point. It should, both in its literary grace and in its Divine revelations, be a well-spring of spiritual life in the broadest and highest sense of the terms. We cannot be too grateful, therefore, that the framers of our Authorised Version were not only skilled in ‘the discernment of tongues’, but were gifted with an ear for melody. This particular excellence of the AV was recognized even by Roman Catholic scholars who feared that it would make a deep impression upon the minds of many readers. Archbishop Faber declared,

Who will not say that the uncommon beauty and marvellous English of the Protestant Bible is not one of the great strongholds of heresy in this country? It lives on the ear, like a music that can never be forgotten, like the sound of church bells, which the convert hardly knows how he can forgo. Its felicities often seem to be almost things rather than mere words. It is part of the national mind, and the anchor of national seriousness.

At the present time one might well inquire whether any such testimony could be borne in praise of any of the numerous modern versions that are offered in its place.”

Trinitarian Bible Society Booklet[2]