Tuesday, August 5, 2008

No Place To Go



Run for the border, but which border?


Pastor X has left a new comment on your post "Meta-Funny at Bailing Water":

Don't forget to mention those of us who don't want to "go East" or to Rome, but seem to have nowhere else to go. I'm not suggesting that those are viable alternatives, just that many of us exist in a kind of "Where are we supposed to go now?" state.

***

GJ - Lutherans seem to be stuck on the present synodical setup. Applying the Word will create the opportunities God has willed. Management by Objective has not worked so well.

No Wonder LCMS Pastors Are Fleeing to Rome




Paul McCain said...

I realize it is essential for the continuing existence of the WELS to continue to put distance between itself and The LCMS, but slander is now (sic) way to do that.

This statement:

[i]A conservative Concordia Seminary professor recently affirmed that no one he knows at the seminary still teaches that all of the Bible is God’s inspired and inerrant word.[/i]

Is absolutely and completely false and slander.

WELS folks need to be extremely careful not to permit the right-wing newspaper Christian News shape their opinions of The LCMS.

It is disgraceful that you would spread such slander and lies on your web site.

August 3, 2008 6:41 PM


Anonymous said...
"I realize it is essential for the continuing existence of the WELS to continue to put distance between itself and The LCMS, but slander is now way to do that."

Wow. A warning against slander which contains slander within it. I've never seen hypocrisy in such a concise form.

August 3, 2008 8:10 PM


Rev. Fr. Spence said...
Rev. McCain - Nice "dig" at the WELS, i.e. we "need" to stay apart from LC-MS to survive. I'm not so sure that's true. Hmmm, let's see, how long did WELS exist while in fellowship with Missouri? I believe it was more than 100 years. Besides being inaccurate and churlish, the comment was beneath you, Rev. McCain. I expected better from you. As for Christian News, I'm sure Herman would be happy to give you space to point out all the instances where he has been wrong. Go for it, or leave him alone.

***

GJ - Christian News was absolutely essential in getting Barry elected. That is why McCain worked closely and covertly with Otten to get Barry elected. Christian News was so radioactive then that open courting of Otten would have sent Barry and McCain to the ELS Gulag.

McCain continued to work secretly with Otten once Barry was elected. Previously Bohlmann and Jack Preus used Otten to get themselves elected.

Otten also got Kieschnick elected but never faced the truth about that debacle. Otten accepts Cascione's twisted version of everything and reproduces it in the paper. Thus Casione's attacks against Ft. Wayne, via Christian News, served to divide the conservatives and split that vote.

McCain calls attention to his past by making Christian News his straw man.

McCain Gets Bailing Water to Retract the Truth



"Do not arouse the wrath of the great and powerful Oz."


I realize it is essential for the continuing existence of the WELS to continue to put distance between itself and The LCMS, but slander is now (sic) way to do that.

McCain, who helped pull the rug out from under Robert Preus, got Bailing Water to withdraw the truth about LCMS seminaries.

So far, there is no retraction of McCain's snide comments about WELS. That is how apostates work. First, they demand absolute proof of any statement made. If the proof is in writing, they immediately change the subject. If anything less than a videotape (certified by the Attorney General) is not available, they demand a retraction. But they are too haughty to withdraw their own insulting comments. McCain is justly famous for those.

Lutherans would be grateful if he spent less time charming the ELCA pastors at the ALPB website and more time warming up to conservatives.

But, as Orson Welles learned, that is the problem with peaking too early in one's career.

Besides, if an editor wants to post snarky comments on Bailing Water, he should do a little proof-reading first. No?

Monday, August 4, 2008

Martin Luther College Chapel Blows Budget


McGavran Chapel at Martin Luther College has blown through its initial budget. Obviously they were looking at a low-cost church, with rubber mats instead of red carpeting, for only $7 million.

The bids came in $800,000 above the budget, so WELS leaders did what everyone expected. They said, "So what! We'll take $300K here and $500K there, and pay the difference."

At $8 million, the building deserves to be called a cathedral. McGavran Chapel sounds so pedestrian. But imagine the PR value of this title - The Cathedral of Church Growth.

MLC Costs 2008-2009
Tuition $10,350
Room & Board $4,020
Total $14,370

They never had a place to worship before.

Mrs. Ichabod is reading over my shoulder again. She says, "The college is almost 125 years old. Surely they had worship services before."

I knew that. They got by for 125 years without the Cathedral of Church Growth. They need a separate building, they say, to continue their progress in the Church Shrinkage Movement.

Larry Olson (DMin, Fuller)--the Waldo Werning Professor of Church Shrinkage--should be the preacher at the dedication.

Progress, as Kelm, Olson, Huebner, and others have claimed, should be specific, achievable, and measurable. Kelm used a longer acronym, but I cannot remember it.

Here are the S.A.M. results of the Church Shrinkage Movement in WELS:
1. Lower baptized membership every year since 1970.
2. Lower communing membership every year since 1970.
3. Vastly increasing number of staffers at the Love Shack.
4. Huge increase in budgets, deficits, and skims (internal loans from designated funds).
5. Closing and merging of congregations.
6. Closing of synodical schools (two preps and one college already).
7. Closing of parochial schools.

Meta-Funny at Bailing Water



Paul McCain, MDiv


Paul McCain said...
I realize it is essential for the continuing existence of the WELS to continue to put distance between itself and The LCMS, but slander is now way to do that.

This statement:

[i] A conservative Concordia Seminary professor recently affirmed that no one he knows at the seminary still teaches that all of the Bible is God’s inspired and inerrant word.[/i]

Is absolutely and completely false and slander.

WELS folks need to be extremely careful not to permit the right-wing newspaper Christian News shape their opinions of The LCMS.

It is disgraceful that you would spread such slander and lies on your web site.

August 3, 2008 6:41 PM

***

GJ - Who sought out and leaked to Herman Otten when he was campaign manager for Al Barry? Paul McCain! Who sent materials to Otten secretly, so Christian News could publish them promptly while denying they were leaked by Barry? Paul McCain!

Who denied working with Otten? Paul McCain! Who bragged to me that he did this? Paul McCain!

Who confirmed to me that Otten and McCain worked together? Herman Otten!

Once McCain got what he wanted from Otten, he told me the news that he was the assistant to Barry (after three years parish experience). He said, "Don't tell Otten."

I ended up seeing Otten soon after. He told me all about their work together and that McCain was Barry's assistant. I told him I knew. Otten said, "How did you know?" I told him what McCain said.

Otten also denied working with McCain - in print, no less.

Bailing Water gave me a good laugh today.

---

Anonymous on Bailing Water said...
"The people in the Missouri Synod have big enough messes in their own synod to deal with before they start worrying about what's going on in the WELS."

Ain't that the truth. Here's a perfect example: "Non Lutheran Female Pastor Featured at LCMS Youth Retreat" (www.ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.
blogspot.com)

And the WELS is supposed to take advice on church and ministry from the LCMS?!? I don't think so.

August 4, 2008 5:11 PM

***

GJ - I also find it amusing that McCain's attitude toward Missouri is the same as Wisconsin's pastors toward their own sect. How dare anyone say Holy Mother Synod is less than perfect!

I have my own little anecdote about seminary professors. One of the St. Louis professors said to me, "When Karl Barth was the president, we had to be so careful about what we taught. Now under Johnson we can teach anything we want."

When I asked this seminary professor about the supposed shortage of pastors, he said, "I don't know and I don't care." Later in the conversation, he said, "So, you are that Greg Jackson?" He took some copies of CLP from me.

We can judge the tree by the fruits. Missouri produces Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox priests and WELS produces ELCA, Pentecostal, and Baptist ministers - both while teaching Church Growth doctrine and denying they have departed from their oh-so-strict doctrinal standards. Not one Lutheran sect today teaches justification by faith in harmony with the Book of Concord (the ruled norm) and the Scriptures (the ruling norm). They stand around the statues of their dead synodical leaders and bow to them.

Non Lutheran Female Pastor Featured at LCMS Youth Retreat



The next frontier, but only legalists will oppose it.


Click here for the link about the LCMS Youth Conference.

This should not be a big deal for the conservatives. LCMS SP Al Barry had no trouble with a husband and wife giving a joint Bible study (so they would not seem to be leading a service). The Sunday service - no, Bible study - looked just like a regular worship service. The Biblical phrase is - a woman in authority over men, or teaching men. She was definitely teaching men.

Women teach men throughout the old Synodical Conference. Women exert authority over men throughout the old Synodical Conference. Changing the issue to voting and ordination is a red herring.

Also, when ELCA Pastor Barb Lundblad preached at an LCMS congregation, nothing was done. I recall that was during the golden Barry era.

I tried to tell Paul McCain that ELCA women vicars were preaching, baptizing, and consecrating at LCMS congregations, but he did not want to hear it. They wrote up their vicarage stories for the Trinity (ELCA) Seminary Libary in Columbus. I read the stories myself.

Doctrinal discipline in the old Synodical Conference (and the nano-sects) = excommunicating anyone who tells the truth. Extending the Left Foot of Fellowship is reserved for conservatives alone to enjoy receiving.

Sunday, August 3, 2008

The Lutheran Hymnal




I am not impressed by the recent Lutheran hymnals, which seem to multiply as they decline in quality. How many new hymnals omit Luther's very first hymn - Flung to the heedless winds? The MDiv editors include their buddies' tone-deaf, atrocious hymns, but they cannot print Luther's first, written in memory of the first Lutheran martyrs, burned at the stake.

Flung to the Heedless Winds

1. Flung to the heedless winds
Or on the waters cast,
The martyrs' ashes, watched,
Shall gathered be at last.
And from that scattered dust,
Around us and abroad,
Shall spring a plenteous seed
Of witnesses for God.

2. The Father hath received
Their latest living breath,
And vain is Satan's boast
Of victory in their death.
Still, still, though dead, they speak,
And, trumpet-tongued, proclaim
To many a wakening land
The one availing Name.


Crucial doctrinal war verses are also missing from the new hymnals. Where is "false sons within the pale" in The Church's One Foundation? Are those words too painfully frank a description of the editors? The same omissions can be found in classic Lutheran hymns, where false doctrine is denounced.

I understand The Lutheran Hymnal can still be bought at Bethany Lutheran College. Many hymnals are still circulating, since they were used and then suddenly orphaned by the watered down and feminist editions.

Below are some resources I found with Google:

A collection of links to TLH resources, from Concordia, Ft. Wayne.

Lutheran Hymnal.

Wikipedia has some details.

TLH hymn texts.

---

Brian P Westgate has left a new comment on your post "The Lutheran Hymnal":

You can still buy TLH at Fort Wayne as well.

Paul Speratus: Salvation Unto Us Has Come




I was going to feature some remarks about Paul Speratus for the service today, but Norm Teigen stole a march on me and posted first.

Speratus wrote this hymn in prison during the Reformation. The tune and words are beloved classics of hymnody. I wonder how many Lutheran clergy today would risk prison and death for the Faith.

Salvation unto Us Has Come

Salvation unto us has come
By God’s free grace and favor;
Good works cannot avert our doom,
They help and save us never.
Faith looks to Jesus Christ alone,
Who did for all the world atone;
He is our one Redeemer.

What God did in His law demand
And none to Him could render
Caused wrath and woe on every hand
For man, the vile offender.
Our flesh has not those pure desires
The spirit of the Law requires,
And lost is our condition.

It was a false, misleading dream
That God His Law had given
So sinners could themselves redeem
And by their works gain Heaven.
The Law is but a mirror bright
To bring the inbred sin to light
That lurks within our nature.

From sin our flesh could not abstain
Sin held its sway unceasing;
The task was useless and in vain,
Our guilt was e’er increasing.
None can remove sin’s poisoned dart
Or purify our guileful heart—
So deep is our corruption.

Yet as the Law must be fulfilled
Or we must die despairing,
Christ came and hath God’s anger stilled,
Our human nature sharing.
He hath for us the Law obeyed
And thus the Father’s vengeance stayed
Which over us impended.

Since Christ hath full atonement made
And brought us to salvation,
Each Christian therefore may be glad
And build on this foundation.
Thy grace alone, dear Lord, I plead,
Thy death is now my life indeed,
For Thou hast paid my ransom.

Let me not doubt, but trust in Thee,
Thy Word cannot be broken;
Thy call rings out, “Come unto Me!”
No falsehood hast Thou spoken.
Baptized into Thy precious Name,
My faith cannot be put to shame,
And I shall never perish.

The Law reveals the guilt of sin
And makes men conscience-stricken;
The Gospel then doth enter in
The sinful soul to quicken.
Come to the cross, trust Christ, and live;
The Law no peace can ever give,
No comfort and no blessing.

Faith clings to Jesus’ cross alone
And rests in Him unceasing;
And by its fruits true faith is known,
With love and hope increasing.
Yet faith alone doth justify,
Works serve thy neighbor and supply
The proof that faith is living.

All blessing, honor, thanks, and praise
To Father, Son, and Spirit,
The God that saved us by His grace—
All glory to His merit!
O Triune God in Heav’n above,
Who hast revealed Thy saving love,
Thy blessèd Name be hallowed.

Obamessiah - The Video




The best satire ever.

The Eleventh Sunday after Trinity



Hummingbird, by Norma Boeckler


The Eleventh Sunday after Trinity

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

Bethany Lutheran Worship, 8 AM Phoenix Time

The Hymn #16 – Liebster Jesus
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual 1 Corinthians 15:1-10
The Gospel Luke 18:9-14
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn # 377:1-6 Speratus – Es ist das Heil
Justification by Faith

The Hymn #313 by Luther – Gott sei gelobet
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 316 by Rist - Nun lob, mein seel


1 Corinthians 15:1-10 (King James Version) King James Version

Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: 5And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve: 6 After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep. 7 After that, he was seen of James; then of all the apostles. 8 And last of all he was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time. 9 For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10 But by the grace of God I am what I am: and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not in vain; but I laboured more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me.

Luke 18:9-14 (King James Version)
9 And he spake this parable unto certain which trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others: 10 Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican. 11 The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. 12 I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess. 13 And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner. 14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.

Lord God, heavenly Father, we beseech Thee so to guide and direct us by Thy Holy Spirit, that we may not forget our sins and be filled with pride, but continue in daily repentance and renewal, seeking our comfort only in the blessed knowledge that Thou wilt be merciful unto us, forgive us our sins, and grant us eternal life; through Thy beloved Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

In six verses, Jesus teaches the difference between self-justification and justification, in a parable everyone seems to know and remember.

The two men represent polar opposites. A Pharisee was someone who was extremely rigorous in the observation of the Law. We quite a bit about the Pharisees from various sources, but also from Paul, who was one.

Acts 23:6, the Apostle Paul declares, "Brethren, I am a Pharisee, a son of Pharisees..."

"Though I myself have reason for confidence in the flesh also... circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew born of Hebrews; as to the law, a Pharisee..." (Phil. 3:4-6).

Paul’s observance included the active, violent persecution of the Christians. He truly believed he was doing God’s will. The Pharisee is someone who measures worth by his own efforts and good works. As Luther observed, the upright citizen is most in danger because he is conscious of his strict observance of all the rules. Luther knew the spirit of the early Paul, because the monks were also fastidious in their observance of all the rules. No one was more observant of the rules than Luther.

The modern equivalent of the Pharisee is the Pietist. There are many variations on the Pietistic themes. Among the tee-totalers, there is the claim, “I have never touched a drop of liquor my whole life.”

In various synods, the question is, “Do you know who father was?” Or, a minister will say, “I did this and that.” The spirit of Phariseeism--or Pietism--is ideal for the Church Growth Movement. “Do you know how big my congregation is?” I met one of the famous CG pastors by accident in St. Louis. We did not discuss the topic itself. The pastor obviously knew what I had written. He gloried in telling me how big his congregation was, how many seats he had in his auditorium.

However, we would miss the whole message of this parable if we thought this parable was about them rather than about us. We are all Pharisees by nature, unless converted by the Gospel and kept in the faith by the Means of Grace.

The interesting aspect of the Pharisee’s prayer in this lesson is how it relates to a common prayer of the time. Here is Jesus’ example, from the parable:

11 The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. 12 I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess.

The rabbis had a prayer that included many different expressions of thankfulness, including “that I was not born a woman.” When Judaism hardened after the resurrection of Christ and the conversion of so many Jews to the faith, the Talmud helped Jews focus on salvation through the Law, through works.

Jewish conversion is perhaps too strong a word, because Old Testament Judaism is the foundation of the Christian faith. The Christian faith is simply the fulfillment of everything taught in the Old Testament. Jewish Christians appreciate this far more than non-Jewish Christians.

I used to be blind to Jewish Christians. Now I realize how many there are. Some are openly Christian. Others keep the fact from their families. At one point I said, “I don’t think many Jews convert to Christianity today.” A communing adult member said, “I’m Jewish.”

The other example is the publican. A publican was a tax-collector, but more than that. He collected taxes for the hated Roman occupation. In many cultures, taxes were farmed out, which caused enormous oppression and hatred. The tax farmer had to collect his quota. Whatever he extorted beyond this was his to keep.

The publican’s prayer did not list his virtues and works, did not denounce the sins of his neighbors:

13 And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.

His prayer, first of all, shows a humble and contrite heart. Genuine contrition is the effect of the Holy Spirit working through the Law. The simple prayer also shows faith, trust in God’s mercy.

Jesus clearly taught the difference between the two examples:

14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.

I have known so many church leaders who were flying high and scornful of all other clergy. Then those high-flyers tumbled, thanks to their own arrogance and pride. The formula for success in this world rewards the worst attitudes, until one day, when everything falls apart. On the other hand, I have seen many clergy hounded out of the ministry, not by the wolves outside the flock, but by the wolves within the flock, their own fellow clergy. In the end, rich and poor, we end up in the same place. Titles, honors, and riches are meaningless.

My wife and I were talking about fame, since we were just in Branson, Missouri. The time before we saw the Roy Rogers museum. We both grew up on Roy Rogers, Dale Evans, and Trigger. Roy’s son sang and did a show in honor of his father. Very few were there. People have forgotten the star of TV and movies, the restaurant owner. I said, “No one remembers Tom Mix anymore either.” My wife said, “Who?” I said, “Tom Mix, the famous movie cowboy.” Then she laughed. She had me again.

Those who place their trust in earthly honors, prestige, power, and money will be more than disappointed. They will be crushed when they find it is all a deception.

The quotations I selected for this sermon all use the term treasure. It is no accident that the Book of Concord uses this term for the Gospel repeatedly. People use many different analogies for justification and salvation, but this comparison is the one used more than once by the Lutheran Symbols. (Symbol is another name for Confessions.)

The image is easy to remember. In New Testament times, a treasure was located in one place, and it consisted of precious metals and jewels. Sometimes certain art objects were extremely valuable as well. The Silk Route from China to the West was really a jade route, since so much was paid for so little (in weight and volume) for those carved objects.

The atonement of Christ is the treasure of the Gospel. That is the message of reconciliation. Jesus has paid for the sins of the world. The atonement is universal and objective. Jesus paid for the sins of the whole world (universal). This act of reconciliation is true whether anyone believes it or not (objective). We base our salvation on the truth of the Gospel message, not on our feelings or works or merits (objective).

A limited atonement is taught by the Calvinists, who hold that Christ died only for the elect. Someone who grew up Presbyterian said recently that Jesus holding the lamb is an example of the shepherd who broke the legs of lambs who ran away too much. The lambs had to be carried until their legs healed. Then they strayed no more. I thought, “What a way to scare kids to death and ruin the Gospel.” The Isaiah passage says, “He shall feed His flock like a shepherd. He shall carry the lambs in His arms, and gently lead those with young.” But, that is Calvinism for you – turning Gospel into Law, hellishly turning a portrait of comfort into an image of terror. So the Calvinists have determined in advance that the treasure is only for a few, the predestined elect. As Twain liked to joke (in Tom Sawyer), they whittle the number of the elect down so far that it hardly seems worth the trouble to try.

Luther’s use the same image, from Luke 15, is quite different. He said, “Christ is just as anxious for me as I am for Him.” What a touching description of the lost sheep parable.

A partial atonement is taught by Roman Catholics. They teach all the right things about Christ dying on the cross. But they say, “Your sins are forgiven, but not paid for. You must spend the rest of your life paying for your sins. And the afterlife in Purgatory paying even more for your sins.”

The atonement is objective and universal. Otherwise, something else would have to be added. That is where the UOJ fanatics fall off the cliff. In struggling to make their statement about Christ dying on the cross, they confuse the atonement with justification by faith.

The atonement is the treasure. But it lies in one pile and does no one any good until it is distributed by the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit works exclusively through the Word, so we have no doubt that God is at work through the Means of Grace.

"For neither you nor I could ever know anything of Christ, or believe on Him, and obtain Him for our Lord, unless it were offered to us and granted to our hearts by the Holy Ghost through the preaching of the Gospel. The work is done and accomplished; for Christ has acquired and gained the treasure for us by His suffering, death, resurrection, etc. But if the work remained concealed so that no one knew of it, then it would be in vain and lost. That this treasure, therefore, might not lie buried, but be appropriated and enjoyed, God has caused the Word to go forth and be proclaimed, in which He gives the Holy Ghost to bring this treasure home and appropriate it to us. Therefore sanctifying is nothing else than bringing us to Christ to receive this good, to which we could not attain ourselves."
The Large Catechism, The Creed, Article III, #38, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 689. Tappert, p. 415. Heiser, p. 194.

Notice the key phrase – God has caused the Word to go forth. The Bible teaches monergism, a fancy word for everything being done by God. God has made sure that the Gospel will be preached to the ends of the earth. (“God has no arms but ours, no legs but ours, no money but ours” – that is a sick, manipulative statement designed to extort money by demeaning God’s power.” Ask Jonah how limited God’s reach is, when a mission is determined by Him.)

God moves people to faith through the Gospel, so He provides the main solution to our sinful condition—the atoning death of His Son—and the means to obtain this forgiveness.

No one is justified apart from faith. The Bible is utterly consistent in giving all honor to the Word, which conveys Christ to us. We could also say, as Luther wrote, that the Means of Grace bring us before Christ. Just as Christ comes to us in the invisible and visible Word, so we come before Him. He knows us individually and gives to us His righteousness, His forgiveness, His salvation.

I recall some Lutherans (under the influence of Baptists at that point) saying, “If that is true, then what role do we have?” Believers who understand this aspect of Biblical teaching realize that God has already provided for them. They need to do nothing. The Word of God does not teach that “we must witness or God won’t let us grow as Christians,” as one person tried to say. The Gospel creates countless opportunities to freely share the message. Cult members come to our doors. Friends and relatives discuss their doubts and questions. Fellow clergy begin to fall away from the faith. The best and greatest opportunity is in our own families. If we baptize our children, teach them the Word, and worship with them, the blessings of the Gospel will influence them their whole lives.

How many clergy have handed their children over to cynicism and hatred of the Gospel by spending all their time building up a career? Their influence would be far greater if they had trained and loved their own children. America has more Christian clergy than all the nations of the world combined. Children have only one earthly father. But that depends on the definition of treasure.

Matthew 6:19 Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal:
20 But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal:
21 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.
Matthew 19:16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?
17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
18 He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,
19 Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
20 The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet?
21 Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.
22 But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions.
23 Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven.
24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

Mark 10:17 And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?
18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.
19 Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Defraud not, Honour thy father and mother.
20 And he answered and said unto him, Master, all these have I observed from my youth.
21 Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me.
22 And he was sad at that saying, and went away grieved: for he had great possessions.
23 And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!
24 And the disciples were astonished at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!
25 It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

Luke 6:20 And he lifted up his eyes on his disciples, and said, Blessed be ye poor: for yours is the kingdom of God.

Luke 6:24 But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation.

Luke 12:15 And he said unto them, Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man's life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth.
16 And he spake a parable unto them, saying, The ground of a certain rich man brought forth plentifully:
17 And he thought within himself, saying, What shall I do, because I have no room where to bestow my fruits?
18 And he said, This will I do: I will pull down my barns, and build greater; and there will I bestow all my fruits and my goods.
19 And I will say to my soul, Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry.
20 But God said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided?
21 So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God.
22 And he said unto his disciples, Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat; neither for the body, what ye shall put on.
23 The life is more than meat, and the body is more than raiment.
24 Consider the ravens: for they neither sow nor reap; which neither have storehouse nor barn; and God feedeth them: how much more are ye better than the fowls?
25 And which of you with taking thought can add to his stature one cubit?
26 If ye then be not able to do that thing which is least, why take ye thought for the rest?
27 Consider the lilies how they grow: they toil not, they spin not; and yet I say unto you, that Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
28 If then God so clothe the grass, which is to day in the field, and to morrow is cast into the oven; how much more will he clothe you, O ye of little faith?
29 And seek not ye what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink, neither be ye of doubtful mind.
30 For all these things do the nations of the world seek after: and your Father knoweth that ye have need of these things.
31 But rather seek ye the kingdom of God; and all these things shall be added unto you.
32 Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom.
33 Sell that ye have, and give alms; provide yourselves bags which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that faileth not, where no thief approacheth, neither moth corrupteth.
34 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.
Luke 16:19 There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day:
20 And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores,
21 And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores.
22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;
23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.
25 But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.
26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence.

Luke 18:18 And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?
19 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.
20 Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother.
21 And he said, All these have I kept from my youth up.
22 Now when Jesus heard these things, he said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me.
23 And when he heard this, he was very sorrowful: for he was very rich.
24 And when Jesus saw that he was very sorrowful, he said, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!
25 For it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
26 And they that heard it said, Who then can be saved?
27 And he said, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God.
28 Then Peter said, Lo, we have left all, and followed thee.
29 And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or parents, or brethren, or wife, or children, for the kingdom of God's sake,
30 Who shall not receive manifold more in this present time, and in the world to come life everlasting.

1 Timothy 6:17 Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not highminded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy;
18 That they do good, that they be rich in good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate;
19 Laying up in store for themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life.

James 5:1 Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.
2 Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.
3 Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.
4 Behold, the hire of the labourers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth: and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord of sabaoth.
5 Ye have lived in pleasure on the earth, and been wanton; ye have nourished your hearts, as in a day of slaughter.
Revelation 3:17 Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:
18 I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.
19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.


Justification by Faith Quotations – The Treasure

J-520
"It is a faithful saying that Christ has accomplished everything, has removed sin and overcome every enemy, so that through Him we are lords over all things. But the treasure lies yet in one pile; it is not yet distributed nor invested. Consequently, if we are to possess it, the Holy Spirit must come and teach our hearts to believe and say: I, too, am one of those who are to have this treasure. When we feel that God has thus helped us and given the treasure to us, everything goes well, and it cannot be otherwise than that man's heart rejoices in God and lifts itself up, saying: Dear Father, if it is Thy will to show toward me such great love and faithfulness, which I cannot fully fathom, then will I also love Thee with all my heart and be joyful, and cheerfully do what pleases Thee. Thus, the heart does not now look at God with evil eyes, does not imagine He will cast us into hell, as it did before the Holy Spirit came...."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 279. Pentecost Sunday. John 14:23-31.

J-528
"Faith is that my whole heart takes to itself this treasure. It is not my doing, not my presenting or giving, not my work or preparation, but that a heart comforts itself, and is perfectly confident with respect to this, namely, that God makes a present and gift to us, and not we to Him, that He sheds upon us every treasure of grace in Christ."
Apology of the Augsburg Confession, IV. #48. Of Justification. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 135. Heiser, p. 36.

J-545
"These treasures are offered us by the Holy Ghost in the promise of the holy Gospel; and faith alone is the only means by which we lay hold upon, accept, and apply, and appropriate them to ourselves. This faith is a gift of God, by which we truly learn to know Christ, our Redeemer, in the Word of the Gospel, and trust in Him, that for the sake of His obedience alone we have the forgiveness of sins by grace, are regarded as godly and righteous by God the Father, and are eternally saved."
Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III. #10. Of the Righteousness of Faith before God. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 919. Tappert, p. 541. Heiser, p. 250.

J-590
"For neither you nor I could ever know anything of Christ, or believe on Him, and obtain Him for our Lord, unless it were offered to us and granted to our hearts by the Holy Ghost through the preaching of the Gospel. The work is done and accomplished; for Christ has acquired and gained the treasure for us by His suffering, death, resurrection, etc. But if the work remained concealed so that no one knew of it, then it would be in vain and lost. That this treasure, therefore, might not lie buried, but be appropriated and enjoyed, God has caused the Word to go forth and be proclaimed, in which He gives the Holy Ghost to bring this treasure home and appropriate it to us. Therefore sanctifying is nothing else than bringing us to Christ to receive this good, to which we could not attain ourselves."
The Large Catechism, The Creed, Article III, #38, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 689. Tappert, p. 415. Heiser, p. 194.

Saturday, August 2, 2008

Justification by Faith - The Treasure
Book of Concord




From Thy Strong Word:

J-520
"It is a faithful saying that Christ has accomplished everything, has removed sin and overcome every enemy, so that through Him we are lords over all things. But the treasure lies yet in one pile; it is not yet distributed nor invested. Consequently, if we are to possess it, the Holy Spirit must come and teach our hearts to believe and say: I, too, am one of those who are to have this treasure. When we feel that God has thus helped us and given the treasure to us, everything goes well, and it cannot be otherwise than that man's heart rejoices in God and lifts itself up, saying: Dear Father, if it is Thy will to show toward me such great love and faithfulness, which I cannot fully fathom, then will I also love Thee with all my heart and be joyful, and cheerfully do what pleases Thee. Thus, the heart does not now look at God with evil eyes, does not imagine He will cast us into hell, as it did before the Holy Spirit came...."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 279. Pentecost Sunday. John 14:23-31.

J-528
"Faith is that my whole heart takes to itself this treasure. It is not my doing, not my presenting or giving, not my work or preparation, but that a heart comforts itself, and is perfectly confident with respect to this, namely, that God makes a present and gift to us, and not we to Him, that He sheds upon us every treasure of grace in Christ."
Apology of the Augsburg Confession, IV. #48. Of Justification. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 135. Heiser, p. 36.

J-545
"These treasures are offered us by the Holy Ghost in the promise of the holy Gospel; and faith alone is the only means by which we lay hold upon, accept, and apply, and appropriate them to ourselves. This faith is a gift of God, by which we truly learn to know Christ, our Redeemer, in the Word of the Gospel, and trust in Him, that for the sake of His obedience alone we have the forgiveness of sins by grace, are regarded as godly and righteous by God the Father, and are eternally saved."
Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III. #10. Of the Righteousness of Faith before God. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 919. Tappert, p. 541. Heiser, p. 250.

J-590
"For neither you nor I could ever know anything of Christ, or believe on Him, and obtain Him for our Lord, unless it were offered to us and granted to our hearts by the Holy Ghost through the preaching of the Gospel. The work is done and accomplished; for Christ has acquired and gained the treasure for us by His suffering, death, resurrection, etc. But if the work remained concealed so that no one knew of it, then it would be in vain and lost. That this treasure, therefore, might not lie buried, but be appropriated and enjoyed, God has caused the Word to go forth and be proclaimed, in which He gives the Holy Ghost to bring this treasure home and appropriate it to us. Therefore sanctifying is nothing else than bringing us to Christ to receive this good, to which we could not attain ourselves."
The Large Catechism, The Creed, Article III, #38, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 689. Tappert, p. 415. Heiser, p. 194.

Quoting Ichabod Quoting Luther and Others




Mild Colonial Boy

L P Cruz said:
July 23, 2008 at 11:23 pm
I finally got in to comment on your blog.

I believe Dr. Ichabod has some wise things to say. Those who do not listen to their critics will one day be left alone in their own self delutions.

LPC

Meanwhile, On Bailing Water...



SP Schroeder: "Faster."


People are posting furiously, but anonymously, on Bailing Water.

Most of the posting about Lutheran doctrine on the Net is either done anonymously, through secret email lists, or on closed blogs.

No one wants to risk the wrath of the apostates, but they should be afraid of our wrath (more significantly, of God's wrath). As I recall, Robert Preus published in his own name. Jack Preus published in his own name. Marquart published in his own name. When WELS had problems with Missouri liberalism, they organized public forums, not secret meetings.

The timidity evident today comes from a lack of faith in God's Word, in His Promises. The timid trust in the mighty synod pension plan, but not in God's power. The timid love their beloved synod, but they scorn God's Word. The timid say they love God's Word, but in Jerusalem they whisper low the name of Lutheran Confessionalism - lest it be heard on the streets of Gath (2 Samuel 1:20; Schmauk).

God does provide. His Word never fails.

I have been young, and now am old; yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging bread. Psalm 37:25 KJV.

Defeating the Church Growth Movement



Church Growth Enthusiasts, like the WELS Church and Change leaders, love Leonard Sweet. Methodist Sweet was a featured speaker (videotaped) at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis.
Seminex won, my friends.


The only way the Church Growth Movement will be defeated in the Lutheran Church is by opposing its doctrine. Sure the Lutheran CG leaders are unstable, their methods embarrassing, and their sneaker services tacky. But complaining about them is not going to accomplish anything more than it has - which is nothing so far. Thirty years of ineffective grousing should convince us that another route is better.

Here are the basic doctrinal errors of the Church Growth Movement:

1. They deny the efficacy of the Word, which is a foundational Biblical doctrine, essential to all aspects of the Christian faith.

2. They believe they can enlarge the Church by adulterating the Word. In fact, they advocate adulterating the Word.

3. Their favorite word - method - is used once in the New Testament, negatively. Pastors should get out their Greek lexica--or ponies--and look up method in the Greek NT. Hint - it is spelled the same way in Greek, only with Greek letters.

4. They confuse the visible church with the true, invisible Church.

5. Most are closet Universalists, which is fine with Lutheran UOJ fanatics, who are also Universalists. As the WELS CG campaign said, "I am saved, just like you."

6. They do not comprehend Law and Gospel, often confusing the two. They turn Moses into the Savior and the Savior into Moses, to quote Luther.

7. They speak about the Holy Spirit all the time, but they deny the exclusive work of the Holy Spirit through the invisible Word of teaching and preaching, the visible Word of the Sacrament. (This is directly related to the efficacy of the Word.)

8. They follow Calvin and Zwingli in mocking the Sacraments.

9. They claim the Word of God is dead without man's help.

10. Since worship reflects doctrine, they destroy worship in the name of recruiting people.

11. They despise the Confessions, especially the Lutheran Confessions, but also their own confessions, a half-way step on the road to Unitarianism.

12. They are ecumenical to a fault, as long as their fellowship includes only those people who agree with their Church Growth principles. Those who critique their nonsense are excommunicated with prejudice.

***

If nothing is done about this among the Lutherans, there will be no Lutheran doctrine taught in 20 more years, perhaps 10. The names will still be there. The Kool Aid drinkers will be getting in line, taking a number, talking about their "beloved synod." But Lutheran doctrine will be as scarce as a Triglotta at St. Mark's, De Pere.

The upcoming doctrinal study by WELS has already given an ominous hint of things to come. The sect is going to study the Means of Grace, but the official announcement was openly scornful about those who trusted in the Word alone, slandering faithful pastors with the implication that they did not work as hard as their CG counterparts.

I read the announcement as, "The fix is on," but Wayne Mueller took a call soon after. The offical wording definitely had his spirit. Now there is some hope, if some pastors can grow a spine. The District Popes will not help.

Kool-Aid Drinkers All



My sect is perfect and in total harmony, so we do not need Luther's doctrine.


I was going to write a post about Kool-Aid drinkers when the following posts appeared on LutherQuest (sic):



Dianne Dexter (Searching)
Member
Username: Searching

Post Number: 158
Registered: 1-2005
Posted on Saturday, August 02, 2008 - 2:25 pm:

-------------------------------
Jonathan,
Isn't that what the CLC (Church of the Lutheran Confession) did? The ones that formed the CLC had the will...and they organized out of the 3 above-mentioned synods. Politics and power are absent in the CLC...except the power of the Word of God.

(Just my thoughts when I read your last sentence.)

^^^^

Rev. Stephen Kurtzahn (Hville79)
New member
Username: Hville79

Post Number: 13
Registered: 6-2008
Posted on Saturday, August 02, 2008 - 3:44 pm:

----------------------------------
Dianne:
I'm a rather new poster on LutherQuest. I am a pastor who colloquized into the WELS in 2002 from the CLC, the Church of the Lutheran Confession. I was in the CLC for 27 years (after being raised mostly in the WELS and attending WELS synodical schools) and a pastor in the CLC for 23. I served on several boards and committees, including the Board of Doctrine. I also served as Conference Visitor (like a circuit pastor in the WELS but for a larger geographic area). I can tell you from personal experience and observation that politics and power are just as present in the CLC as it may be in the WELS, the ELS or the LC-MS. That's because these are all human organizations made up of sinful human beings.

Yes, as a WELS pastor I would have a problem with one of my members participating in the Lord's Supper at a non-WELS, non-ELS church.

Jonathan:
The basic premise is not flawed. Scripture teaches there should be complete unity in the teachings and practices of Scripture for there to be any expression of fellowship. 1 Cor. 1:10 comes to mind as just one of many passages. The WELS has defined this as the Unit Concept of Fellowship. In our imperfect world, the best way to express this unity and oneness is through our church and synod membership. To say "There is a stream of unity in doctrine and practice between the three synods that is ignored and marginalized in the name of politics and power" is simply an unwise statement to make. If there are people in the LCMS or the CLC that believe all the same things I do, that would be wonderful. Our unity is found in the Holy Christian Church! But as long as such people subscribe their names to a denomination that clearly teaches false doctrine or officially is legalistic, then I dare not give the impression there is unity when there is not. To express unity in such situations would be to trivialize error, whether the error be in a doctrinal formulation or in a legalistic practice or in an un-evangelical emphasis. I don't think any confessional Lutheran would want to trivialize error.

^^^^

Jonathan Townsend (Jtownsend)
Intermediate Member
Username: Jtownsend

Post Number: 299
Registered: 1-2005
Posted on Saturday, August 02, 2008 - 6:10 pm:

----------------------------------------------------
Pastor Kurtzahn:
Three years ago I moved. I left the most confessional LCMS Lutheran congregation I was ever a member of, Emmanuel Dearborn, for an equally confessional WELS congregation St. Peter's in Plymouth. There are two basic differences: I have a different pastor, and the synod is different. In doctrine and practice both are unabashedly UAC Lutheran. There is no trivialization here. There is either UAC Lutheran or not. That should be the standard for fellowship.

I think Luther and Chemnitz would be ashamed of us for the current division.
------------------------------------------------------
Feld Unbekannt

^^^^

Rev. Stephen Kurtzahn (Hville79)
New member
Username: Hville79

Post Number: 14
Registered: 6-2008
Posted on Saturday, August 02, 2008 - 7:29 pm:

--------------------------------------------------
Jonathan:
Not only wold (sic) Luther and Chemnitz be ashamed, but I know the Lord himself would be ashamed of us for many things. Praise God we are covered in Christ's righteousness!

That being said, if Emmanuel, Dearborn is unabashedly UAC Lutheran, why does it stay in a synod that has officially strayed from the Word in so many different areas in both its doctrine as well as its practice?

***

GJ - Wait until the cyber-minders of WELS find out Kurtzahn is posting on LQ (sic). I am sure that is a breech of fellowship. Too bad the LQ (sic) site does not have a spell checker or a doctrine checker. If those tools were installed, there would be precious few posts.

Recently Jack Cascione (former ELS colloquy reject) stated that the Gospel required the Voters' Assembly to be effective. Even the normally docile Rolf Preus opined that Jack needed a longer vacation. Coming from Preus, a man who thinks everyone in the world is already forgiven, without faith or the Means of Grace, that is pretty severe. Will Jack join the Rolf Synod? Will Rolf join the Cascione Synod?

Dianne Dexter, having finished a quart of CLC (sic) Kool Aid, is certain she has found a synod without politics, without a zephyr of false doctrine. Their missionary-force-of-one, David Koenig, praises Roman and Reformed doctrine while denouncing Lutheran doctrine. His buddy, Paul Tiefel, joins him in this farce. That nano-sect is consistently opposed to the Confessions, but they claim otherwise.

This is really funny--> When I claimed Valleskey went to Fuller, Koenig contacted Valleskey to see if it was true. Valleskey confessed, and did not deny, but confessed that he did go to Fuller. (Remember that Valleskey called me a liar six ways from Sunday for saying he did go there.) Next Koenig wrote me that Valleskey was angry with him for telling me the truth, which I publicized for the good of Valleskey's soul. So Koenig was angry with me for telling the truth and naming him as the source. Poor David was also in close contact with Larry Olson (DMin, Fuller). The Church Growth fellowship is far more true and loyal and united than any synodical ties. Meanwhile, buddy Paul Tiefel was working with his first cousin James Tiefel.

All these sects are really Pietistic movements with some hints of Lutheranism in them. That is why some of the apostate ministers end up as honest Baptists or Pentecostals, others as honest Romanists or EO priests.

The trouble is, the Lutheran sects in America no longer have any doctrinal leadership. They have Kool Aid drinkers who constantly apologize for all their doctrinal errors or silence everyone with "I am fat and dumb," (to quote a WELS circuit pastor.)

I post Episcopal news because they have leaders who are visibly and audibly fighting error in their own denomination. I have no interest in promoting their latitudinarianism. Lutherans today do not have enough fight to knock the skin off a pudding.

PS - Rev. Jim Jones was a Marxist bi-sexual minister of the Disciples of Christ, the same denomination as Donald McGavran. The Disciples had a discipline committee (ironic name) that did nothing about the well known abuses of Jones, long before the tragic massacre.

Friday, August 1, 2008

Typical Apostate Behavior - Anglican Style



Even Donald Trump Scowls at a Tranny GOP Mayor


LAMBETH: Bishops Tackle Homosexuality in Bid to Avert Schism

News Analysis

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
8/1/2008

Bishops of the Anglican Communion threw in the towel today finally admitting that they could not "avoid homosexual/lesbian relations" in their Indaba groups, and that there was no way forward on such a communion-breaking issue. They hoped against hope that their inability to find answers would not split the Anglican Communion.

Bishops here are pinning their hopes on a Covenant that protracted talks could take years to agree upon, and that may keep the communion glued together.

GAFCON leaders, already chaffing at the bit over the intransigence of homosexual acceptance in The Episcopal Church, will get no joy or relief from the indecision by these Lambeth bishops. Archbishop Gregory Venables of the Southern Cone held out little hope that the Communion will now hold together. He foresees an eventual split.

Some Episcopal Church bishops today apologized to members of their Indaba groups saying they had no idea that their action in consecrating the homosexual Bishop of New Hampshire had caused such a negative impact in many parts of the communion, despite the fact that the consecration of Gene Robinson occurred more than five years ago.

It is disingenuous for liberal and revisionist bishops to suddenly say they did not know the harm they had caused by consecrating Robinson. The Internet weekly explodes with reports of the behavior of American liberal and revisionist bishops who have blessed same-sex unions, hired openly partnered same-sex priests, inhibited and deposed orthodox priests and much more.

The bishops said that while there is a desire to end the spiral of chaos around this issue, "there appears to be no desire to be so decisive at this stage." The bishops are looking for a "no win, no lose" scenario to hold the communion together. The bishops said there was a need to "develop further trust" if the Anglican Communion was going to survive.

That now appears unlikely.

The bishops said it was important not to make "judgments" because both sides have done careful Bible study. They said both sides need to repent of positions that have "damaged the dignity of homosexual/lesbian people" but did not call upon pansexualists to repent of their behavior.

They acknowledged that in some parts of the communion homosexual/lesbian relations are "taboo" in others it is a "justice" issue. The bishops cannot agree whether it is a first or second order issue.

The bishops also admitted that this is not a "single act", but is something that will happen again. They also admitted that any unilateral action by any province without consulting the Communion would "profoundly disrupt the church."

The bishops said the impact on the Anglican Communion has resulted in "lost and damaged partnerships", and that in some places the church is ridiculed as the "gay church" resulting in lost membership. In other places, it is seen as a betrayal of the teaching of missionaries who brought the faith and is viewed as a "new form of colonization".

The bishops further admitted that the whole issue of homosexuality diverts attention from the communion's "primary focus", lead to "sexual license", affected "ecumenical and interfaith relationships" and bishops cannot be a symbol of unity when the consecration of Robinson divided the church. "The unique focus of catholicity in the Communion is lost," they said. "In some regions the issue has become a test of orthodoxy and a basis for hostile actions."

Reviewing their options, the bishops said they "keep walking, keep talking", and let God be God and allow Him to transform the attitude and behavior of people, exercise more "listening", "patience", "reaffirm Lambeth 1:10 resolution" and accept that it was a mistake to ignore it, and, above all, cease cross provincial and diocesan borders to "create space for creative responses."

There can be little doubt that the Lambeth Conference is now fully polarized and could split into multiple networks. GAFCON bishops are committed to the Anglican Communion, but not in its present form or necessarily with Rowan Williams as its head. Archbishop Henry Orombi made that very clear in a recent letter from Uganda. Loyalty to Holy Scripture does not mean continued loyalty to the Queen as the Governor of the Church of England or to Rowan as the Archbishop of Canterbury.

The Global South is committed to Holy Scripture as its primary authority. They have rejected the Instruments of Unity and might well enthrone Nigerian Archbishop Peter Akinola as the titular head of a new reinvigorated Anglican Communion with the Great Commission as its primary mission thrust and the 1662 Prayer Book as its primary book for worship.

GAFCON currently represents 75% of the Anglican Communion (40 out of 55 million church-going Anglicans) and after this week that figure could rise significantly. Moderate or "open" evangelicals like Fulcrum, Global South Associates, Anglican Communion Institute and bishops like Tom Wright, (Durham) John W. Howe (Central Florida) will be forced to make a decision. Fence sitting is finished. The 2009 Episcopal General Convention will be a triumph of pansexual behavior in The Episcopal Church. The Episcopal Church is incapable of reversing itself.

It is clear that the Lambeth Conference, one of the four Instruments of Unity, is in total disarray. Many of the bishops believe it is breaking up. A number believe it will be the last Lambeth. They may well be right.

Two ELS Pastors Leave the Little Sect on the Prairie


The Pope Speaks:

Rev. Karl Kuenzel is no longer on the clergy roster of the Evangelical Lutheran Synod. Karl has colloquized into the LCMS.

Rev. Michael Langlais is no longer on the clergy roster of the Evangelical Lutheran Synod. Michael has colloquized into the ELCA.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Team Yakov




We designed Team Yakov t-shirts for everyone when we went to see Yakov Smirnoff in Branson, Missouri. Mrs. Ichabod executed the plan. Once all the spelling was correct, we took the shirts on our trip.

Yakov thought we just wanted him to sign our shirts. He does that often. We said, "We came to give you your own and one for your mother." She was watching his show and working the gift shop, as she always does.

Yakov was startled and moved. He said, "In 15 years no one has ever given me a t-shirt. I am always signing them."

He signed ours while we talked about his show. I watched him gather his two shirts up when he left for the second half of the show. Afterwards he signed a book for one of the grandchildren.

The shirts feature a picture of the Statue of Liberty, the climax of his show.

No Jokes or Salacious Stories on Ichabod




The old Synodical Conference is funny enough and salacious enough on its own, so no outside jokes or stories are needed.

Church Growth Commentary




Lutheran Notes:

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Church Growth Model Married to WELS union lethal for congregations

Another pastor who doesn't do anything because he follows the CG model even though he only has 45 members to task: see this post that Ichabod's Dr. Jackson already linked to, and this comment on that post, and this comment on another post.

The CG model creates the "too many chiefs and too few Indians scenario" in many WELS churches, which tend to be on the smallish side.

The WELS is a union--make no mistake about it--so when you marry a CG "Pastor as CEO" model to the WELS union, the pastors end up doing no evangelism--big time! The members refuse to do it all, and he refuses to implement any program at all unless the members commit to more than they are willing to do. So nothing gets done evangelism-wise.

Perhaps some independent churches can be successful with the CG model--despite it being bad theology--because their pastor is not a part of a union, and can more readily be forced to do evangelism and visitation whether the congregation does enough to meet the pastors expectations, or not.

When pastors do no evangelism because they can't implement the CG model, they sit around and blame the mega-community churches for stealing all their members and potential members, causing the church to shrink so it has to be merged with other shrinking WELS churches.

I'm not for CG, but I'm (at least) for doing what pastors and elders did in the past, which is visiting people and teaching them, encouraging them to come to church,
and maybe even leading neighborhood canvassing efforts where people are invited to church--like was done in the old days--since shoe gum and tracts were affordable even during the Depression-era.

related post:

By Rob, 1 July 2008

WELS is run by the pastors & teachers union. Most delegates to national and district conventions are members of the union. In my experience, even some lay delegates are former or retired teachers, therefore members of the union. (BTW, Synod Constitution prohibits this practice, yet it's done.) The COP is 100% union. The SC contains non-union members, and maybe this contributes to occasional friction between SC and COP. In our culture, unions expect two pay increases per year: longevity (step) increase, plus inflation cost of living adjustment. Under union rules, pay never goes down.

---

Bailing Water Commentary

twissted_sisster said...

Better get used to it. If the church and change gang have their way, our good old historical lutheran way of conducting worship services is a thing of the past. We traditional people are just not 'with it'. C'mon- you don't want to be one of those 'head-in-the-sand people', do ya?

Until people stand up and demand that these pastors do THEIR jobs, they'll continue to guilt you into doing it for them. Not everyone IS a minister. It's a gift that has been given to some. What about these pastors going out to visit the members that ARE on the books before you go knock on doors in an attempt to run up your numbers? C'mon laity, hold their feet to the fire. Many of the these pastors are getting paid a pretty penny to do their jobs and turn around and try to get you to do it for them.

July 31, 2008 12:11 AM

rlschultz said...

I am getting that funny feeling in the pit of my stomach that many of these pastors and lay leaders are attending the same CG seminars. We have a ministry plan at our WELS congregation as well. Our pastors don't talk about it directly too often. The plan seems to manifest itself in all of the new and allegedly great ideas to bring in more people and save more souls. Maybe you are fortunate that your ministry plan is all talk right now. The devil is in the details. When the plan is actually implemented, watch what they do more than what they say. You just might get the pastor parading around like a TV evangelist and lay lectors doing the readings.

July 31, 2008 6:54 AM

Anonymous said...

In my experience, church growth methodology is almost always pushed by the laity, not the pastors. Most pastors fight it all the way, but get overruled by a council or by the voters.

It's always faster and easier for a pastor to do all of the work by himself. When you have to start to training and supervising people, that's when the huge investment of time comes into play.

So before people start blaming pastors for everything wrong in a congregation or synod, the members of that congregation or synod ought to look seriously at themselves first.

July 31, 2008 8:06 AM

***

Ten Basic Facts about Church Growth

GJ - Anonymous may have experienced laity pushing CG, but the CGM is the first fad ever forced from above on all the congregations by the leadership. Here are some facts:
1. Almost all the world mission executives (of all denominations) went to Fuller for CG training. That is why the Mission Vision Statement by the Assemblies of God is just like WELS' and Missouri's.
2. Fuller expanded their business model by applying their marketing and statistical ideas to American missions. They roped all those executives in as well.
3. ELCA, Missouri, WELS, and the ELS sent men to Fuller (later to Willow Creek too) and various other CG franchises.
4. The pan-Lutheran CG effort was enhanced by AAL-LB, now Thrivent money.
5. Because of executives being training at Fuller, any Lutheran pastor with a Fuller degree (Larry Olson, DMin, Fuller) was given preferential treatment, even though "all WELS pastors know Larry is a false teacher." Ergo, he is harmless?
6. Kent Hunter and Waldo Werning, both Fuller trained, have worked in all the synods to promote their false doctrine. Werning does his best to drive CG critics out of the ministry. Hunter has become a major pan-denominational CG guru, in spite of his ridiculous books. Hunter and Werning are both LCMS, both Who's Who in Church Growth.
7. Both LCMS seminaries teach CG as part of their curriculum. Robert Preus started the CG program and endorsed CG principles when he was president of Concordia, Ft. Wayne.
8. David Valleskey and Frosty Bivens built their careers by promoting CG, ending up as professors at the Sausage Factory. Both bragged about going to Fuller. Both denied going to Fuller. Every sausage is sauteed in CG before graduating.
9. WELS, probably led by Wayne Mueller, established Church and Change to push CG even more, to the extreme point of registering people for the C and C conference from the official WELS website. This registration was going on while WELS pastors were being told that C and C was utterly destroyed by Gurgel (Honest Abe Gurgel, now in a secure, undisclosed location). Adam Mueller (son of Wayne) is a leader in C and C.
10. American mission leaders in all the synods, from the lavender ELCA to the dysfunctional CLC (sic) are united by CG doctrine.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

WELS Worship a Joke



Fuller Baggage

From Bailing Water:

I have been sitting back reading the comments about everyone's a minister. I just thought I would share another recent visit to a WELS worship service. This service actually used hymns from CW and followed parts of the liturgy. What is interesting is that the only part the pastor partook in was the sermon and communion. Meanwhile, the staff (or is it staph) minister led the service and lay men did the Bible readings. Maybe the sermon is all the young minister can handle since he was parading around the altar and up and down the aisles during the 35 minute sermon. This is a church of about 400-500 members. I just found it odd that the called pastor did not lead the service.

My Harvard and Yale College



Church Growth leader shepherds his flock.


Herman Melville said the ship was his Harvard and Yale College. Mine was Columbus, Ohio, where the cancer of Church Growth was funded and promoted by WELS.

District VP Paul Kuske set up a way to let Floyd Luther Stolzenburg pretend he was a WELS pastor, even though Floyd was recently forced out of the LCMS ministry--for cause--and divorced by his wife. Kuske tried to set him up as the resident Church Growth expert, but the board refused Floyd for being so obnoxious. More money was thrown on the table, and Roger Zehms, another divorced pastor, was imported from St. Louis, to give Lutheran Parish Resources two experts in CG.

Even though Floyd was scornful of WELS and never joined WELS, VP Paul Kuske and DP Robert Mueller were eager to treat him as a WELS pastor and make it official. The Columbus pastors sat around Floyd like puppies and listened to all his attacks on the Gospel, joining in where they could. Money made them wag their tails, sit up and beg.

That was how I learned so much about the Book of Concord. I read it before, studied it from time to time. Hardly any pastors would say anything about CG. If they did, they backed down. Like the war elephants of ancient times, they were more dangerous in retreating than they were in attacking. So I turned to Luther, Chemnitz, and the Book of Concord. Everything about the CGM was there.

I quoted Luther, the Book of Concord, Walther, Pieper, Lenski - and the WELS leaders were furious. They constantly meddled with the parish, joined by the Columbus pastors and the divorced CG experts. The CG critics trembled in their warrens, afraid someone might find out they had Lutheran tendencies.

The District Mission Board was robotic-Church Growth - Adrian and Oelhaven.

So how did all this work out for Columbus?

1. VP Kuske endorsed Floyd as the pastor Emanuel Lutheran, Columbus, but Kuske denied it, of course. Floyd is still operating there.
2. Zehms suddenly left Columbus for LFL, then left there for Texas. His first wife can sing, "All my exes live in Texas."
3. M. Schroeder was kicked out of WELS, so his congregation went with him. WELS still takes money from him. Can you see the tails wagging? Look up Salem Foundation at the Sausage Factory.
4. Schroeder's assistant pastor left WELS for Missouri and left Missouri for the Baptists.
5. Roger Kovaciny headed to the Ukraine with David Jay Webber. Kovo resigned from the ELS ministerium. Webber came back from the Ukraine to work in Scottsdale.
6. Schuman, who was Floyd's CG buddy, was forced to resign from St. Paul's. He became a Thrivent salesman but is not listed with them now.
7. Fred Adrian, DMB chair, was furious (like Oelhaven and Kovo) that I dared to criticize CG in my conference paper. Adrian supervised Vicar Zerbe, who went to the state hoosegow for having an affair with a minor girl. Fred later resigned from the ministry. He never did his DMB work. I heard he was too busy...
8. Pilgrim Community Church, started by Zehms, Floyd, and Kuske, folded. They did not want any WELS visitors or transfers to their little CG experiment. In that regard they were successful beyond their wildest dreams.
9. Likewise, the Brazilian video tape ministry fiasco ended with Richard Starr coming home with a lot less fanfare than when he left.

By the way, when I say that WELS leaders were angry about my criticisms of CG, I mean incoherent with rage. Oelhaven, Adrian, and Kovo went bonkers in front of the conference. Later, I saw Paul Iiefel (CLC sic) uncorked the same way. Readers need to know how invested the ELS-WELS-LCMS clergy are in false doctrine.