Saturday, January 24, 2009

The Third Sunday after Epiphany



Cover for Liberalism, by Norma Boeckler



The Third Sunday after the Epiphany

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

Bethany Lutheran Worship, 8 AM Phoenix Time

The Hymn #339 Coronations
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual Romans 12:16-21
The Gospel Matthew 8:1-13
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #423 Hyfrydal

The Effective Word

The Hymn #341 Diademata
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #401 Freu dich sehr

KJV Romans 12:16 Be of the same mind one toward another. Mind not high things, but condescend to men of low estate. Be not wise in your own conceits. 17 Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men. 18 If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men. 19 Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. 20 Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. 21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.

KJV Matthew 8:1 When he was come down from the mountain, great multitudes followed him. 2 And, behold, there came a leper and worshipped him, saying, Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean. 3 And Jesus put forth his hand, and touched him, saying, I will; be thou clean. And immediately his leprosy was cleansed. 4 And Jesus saith unto him, See thou tell no man; but go thy way, shew thyself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them. 5 And when Jesus was entered into Capernaum, there came unto him a centurion, beseeching him, 6 And saying, Lord, my servant lieth at home sick of the palsy, grievously tormented. 7 And Jesus saith unto him, I will come and heal him. 8 The centurion answered and said, Lord, I am not worthy that thou shouldest come under my roof: but speak the word only, and my servant shall be healed. 9 For I am a man under authority, having soldiers under me: and I say to this man, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doeth it. 10 When Jesus heard it, he marvelled, and said to them that followed, Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel. 11 And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. 12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. 13 And Jesus said unto the centurion, Go thy way; and as thou hast believed, so be it done unto thee. And his servant was healed in the selfsame hour.

Third Sunday After Epiphany
O almighty and everlasting God, mercifully look upon our infirmities, and in all dangers and necessities stretch forth Thy mighty hand, to defend us against our enemies; through Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

The Effective Word

This Gospel lesson gives us two healings, and we should remind ourselves of a basic lesson in all these healings. No matter how Jesus responded at the moment He was asked, He always answered the prayers of the petitioners. All were healed. This alone is reason to take our troubles to Him.

The second healing is especially worthwhile to note at this time. The most basic doctrine of the Bible is under attack by Lutherans who were trained by false teachers at heretical institutions.

The basic doctrine is the efficacy or effectiveness of the Word.

Sad to say, the Lutherans of the last 100 years or so have built upon a weak foundation – their own. They have largely neglected or attacked this basic doctrine. For example, when I decided to study the efficacy of the Word for Thy Strong Word, I found almost no scholarly literature at all. In contrast, I found hundreds of Luther quotations where he made it absolutely clear that God’s Word alone is effective – nothing else. The same message is emphasized throughout the Book of Concord and elsewhere among the great Lutheran theologians.

There are 19th century Lutherans who taught the same, but the 20th century saw a growing embarrassment over God working through His Word alone. Perhaps the growth of evolution and shame about Creation generated this apathy or neglect.

The Old Testament makes it clear that God works through His Word. I ended up studying Hebrew and Judaism more than most, and I know this concept has carried through to this day. Whatever God commands happens. That is even applied to rabbis. For example, when a rabbi said, “He must be dead,” his son-in-law fell over and died. That story was told to illustrate the power of the rabbinic Word. Once spoken, it must be true.

The story of Creation in Genesis 1 is one of the Word creating. Clearly, if the power of the Word is removed through evolution, all perspectives are changed. That is why all the miracles were explained away with rationalism. If man cannot do something, then God cannot. Soon God is out of the picture altogether and man is the measure of all things.

There is no difference between the Old Testament and New Testament views. The more someone is an authentic Jews, the more he realizes that the New Testament is a continuation of the Old. There is no gap or contrast because the New Testament takes the Old as the authority, the very Word of God.

When the liturgical service is ending, the Trinitarian Aaronic blessing is used.

KJV Numbers 6:24
The LORD bless thee, and keep thee:
25 The LORD make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee:
26 The LORD lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace.

That is God speaking, even when an ordinary person is saying those words. God is actually blessing each believer as the Lord God Father and Creator, the Lord God Jesus Christ, the Lord God Holy Spirit, the unity of the Three, the three-ness of the One.

I often mention Isaiah 55:8-11 as a key passage about the Word. That passage shows how the Word’s effect is just as inevitable as the effect of rain and snow.

Paul addresses the same issue in Romans 10

We preach the Word of faith –
KJV Romans 10:8 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach; 9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

The Apostle made it very clear, first of all, that salvation itself is simple and clear. (Remaining in the Faith is very tough.)

Then he explained in reverse how the Word works:

KJV Romans 10:13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. 14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? 15 And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things! 16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report? [GJ - report could be translated as preaching, meaning the hearing of our preaching]

Unless Paul was hiding pop music, marketing methods, Seeker Services, Friendship Sundays, grinning greeters, and how-to messages [no sermons!] from this formula, the Apostle was relying upon the Word alone to bring salvation to all those who heard and believed.

To teach Biblical theology correctly, it is necessary to say the Word of God alone, because all the sects yak about the Word, but they have their little additions, such as the Word and obedience, the Word and sanctification, the Word and witnessing, the Word and marketing.

In the same way, we often need to say the Means of Grace alone, to speak about how God’s grace comes to us. The false teachers speak about grace, but apart from the divinely appointed instruments of grace (the Word and the visible Word of the Sacraments). The Reformed generally make prayer the only way in which God’s grace comes to people, confusing people in the worst possible way. Prayer is the fruit of faith, not the cause of salvation.

Once again I received a message, anonymously, from someone who insisted that God declared the entire world forgiven, quoting this passage:

KJV Romans 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. [judgment came, the free gift came – both phrases are added to the original text]

That seems convincing on surface, like many other tricks of these people. They insist this means every single person received grace without the Word, without the Means of Grace, without faith.

But what about Romans 5:19?

KJV Romans 5:19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

The many are not all, and there is no possible way to turn “the many” into “God declared the world righteous.”

In fact, as Lenski shows with great clarity, verse 17 states exactly how this happens:

KJV Romans 5:17 For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

Those who receive the abundance of grace will reign with Christ. The repeated use of one is to show that by one (Adam) all inherited sin and death, so also by One (Christ) will grace come to all who believe.

This is consistent with the message of Romans 10 that preaching the Word creates faith, that faith in Christ brings forgiveness and salvation.

The marketing salesmen keep saying, “Don’t you want to know how all this works?” – as if it has never been revealed by the Holy Spirit. These windbags offer every single thing except that which really does work – the Word of God in its truth and purity.

The word for effective or efficacious in the New Testament is the root for our word energy. And energy simple means – works in. Or, to use the lingo of Fuller Seminary – the Word alone works.

Centurion’s Servant
The miracle of the centurion’s servant shows us that a Roman soldier understood and believed in the power of the Word. That is, someone does not have to be an Old Testament Jew to understand.

The soldier asked Jesus to cure his servant, who was still at home. The officer knew all about commands. He had the power to order a decimation, where the other soldiers killed 1 out of 10 soldiers. That was used to enforce discipline. If he commanded it, the soldiers obeyed.

Rome tested bridges by having the engineer stand under it while loads were brought across it. That reduced the number of incompetent engineers and increased the motivation of the builders.

No one sued Rome or said, “That’s not fair.” Orders were orders and obeyed.

So when Jesus offered to visit the centurion’s place, the officer said it was not necessary.

Matthew 8:8 The centurion answered and said, Lord, I am not worthy that thou shouldest come under my roof: but speak the word only, and my servant shall be healed. 9 For I am a man under authority, having soldiers under me: and I say to this man, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doeth it.

Jesus marveled at the man’s faith, but He also warned that many would come into the Kingdom of God from outside of Judaism, while the heirs of Abraham would face eternal torment.

He encouraged the centurion by saying the servant would be healed just as the officer believed. So the Word of Christ took effect from a distance – no surprise to children. As they say, “He is God. He can do anything.”

How do we apply this?

We are so surrounded by how-to books that it is no surprise that we think everything is up to us.

How can God, so far away, take care of our problems? We have to compromise here, finagle there, do whatever it takes.

I find it amazing that few seem to realize that the Church grew the most when under persecution and the least when fat and spoiled.

When the Christian faith was hounded, banned, and driven from place to place, the Gospel spread across the earth. Now, with all the money from the wealthiest nation in history, the Gospel is shrinking in the face of Buddhism, Hinduism, and materialism. In many cases, the guardians of the Gospel have traded the Faith for anti-Christianity: spirit guides taught (the occult), Christian Buddhism (impossible), Yoga taught (the basis for all Hinduism), and Feng Shui taken seriously (magic, but really dumb magic at that).

Is it possible to rely on the Word alone and accept what God brings with His Word? Or must we rely on a little of God’s Word with a lot of man’s superior reasoning powers?

As Professor Deutschlander shows so brilliantly in his new book, The Theology of the Cross, the Gospel without the cross is not the Gospel at all.

Those who reject the cross as part of the Christian faith, subsequent to faith, are rejecting the Christian faith altogether. The two cannot be separated. That is why Luther often used the term “the dear cross.” Chytraeus, an editor of the Book of Concord, taught that a mark of orthodoxy was “opposition.”

So when leaders tell a pastor, “Make everyone happy. Avoid conflict,” they are saying “Remove the cross from the Gospel, the Gospel from the church.”

Just a little listening will show how the religious leaders teach the institution, not the Gospel. That is why they fell for marketing and management. If the object of worship is material, then material means are needed. If the object of worship is Christ, then people concern themselves with the Means of Grace alone.

Most congregations would be better off if they got rid of all their activities and just offered worship, education, and pastoral visitation.

The Bible does not teach against the basic elements of common sense. The Book of Proverbs is full of practical knowledge. But the Word elevates God’s role and blesses man with the knowledge and hope of God’s mercy.

God may delay His answer for a long time. He may seem to have forgotten. My cousin was married 25 years before he had his first child. He said, “We wanted to see if our marriage worked out first.” He must have felt like Abraham at that point.

God always listens and answers according to His wisdom. We can rest easy at night because the troubles we trust to Him are answered in the morning. Gerhardt’s beautiful hymn says it so well. My translation is literal and not poetic; the German is clear, simple, and powerful:

2. Der unser Leben, das er uns gegeben,
in dieser Nacht so väterlich bedecket /
und aus dem Schlaf uns fröhlich auferwecket:
Lobet den Herren!

He who our life has given,
in this night has covered us so fatherly
and wakes us joyfully from sleep,
All praise the Lord.

--

Efficacy Quotations

"The Word of God is efficacious not only when it is being read from the Bible, but also when it is being spoken or preached, and when it is recalled by memory. The Word of God, properly speaking, is really not the letters which we see or the sound which we hear, but the divine thoughts, the truths designated by these signs."
E. Hove, Christian Doctrine, Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1930, p. 27.

"'When the Word is read at home it is not as fruitful or as forcible as in public preaching and through the mouth of the preacher whom God has called for this purpose.' (Luther, Erlangen edition, 3:401)."
Henry Eyster Jacobs, A Summary of the Christian Faith, Philadelphia: General Council Publication House, 1913, p. 290.

"The efficacy of the Word, unlike that of the seed, always has a result. The man to whom the Word of God comes, and who repels it, is not as he was before. Where long and persistently refused, hardening at last comes, Exodus 8:15; 9:12; John 12:40; Hebrews 4:1, and the Word becomes a 'savor of death unto death,' 2 Corinthians 2:16. Every word heard or read, every privilege and opportunity enjoyed, leaves its impress either for good or for evil. It is not so properly the Word, as man's abuse of the Word; not so much the efficacy of the Word, as the sin taking occasion of the efficacy that produces this result, Romans 7:8."
Henry Eyster Jacobs, Elements of Religion, Philadelphia, Board of Publication, General Council 1919 p. 155. Exodus 8:15; 9:12; John 12:40; Hebrews 4:1; 2 Corinthians 2:16; Romans 7:8

"Since the Word of God is this weapon [sword], it behooves us to make use of it at all times and to this end become acquainted with it both by means of public preaching and by earnest Bible study at home. Cursory reading must be supplemented by careful memorizing of proof-texts and strong passages. Only in this way shall we be able to make the proper use of the Word of God as a true weapon of offense at all times."
Paul E. Kretzmann, Popular Commentary of the New Testament, 2 vols., St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, II, p. 292. Ephesians 6:17

"God has chosen despised and frail human beings for the ministry of the Word that the divine power of the Word might become apparent—
a power impossible to suppress even in the weakest of persons. Moreover, if the mighty of the world were to preach the Gospel, people would be captivated more by the authority of the person preaching than by the Word itself."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed. Ewald M. Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House 1959 III, p. 1118 W 25, 255; SL 6, 484; brief comments in 1532-34 #3571; Isaiah 40:10

"Quenstedt (I, 170): 'Whether the Word be read or not, whether it be heard and believed or not, yet the efficacy of its spiritual effects is always intrinsically inherent in it by the divine arrangement and communication, nor does this divine efficacy only come to it when it is used. For the Word of God, as such, cannot even be conceived of apart from the divine virtue and gracious working of the Holy Spirit, because this is inseparable from the Word of God.'"
Heinrich Schmid, Doctrinal Theology of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, trans., Charles A. Hay and Henry E. Jacobs, Philadelphia: United Lutheran Publication House, 1899, p. 506.

"Hollazius (993) uses the following figures: 'It possesses and retains its internal power and efficacy even when not used, just as the illuminating power of the sun continues, although, when the shadow of the moon intervenes, no person may see it; and just as an internal efficacy belongs to the seed, although it may not be sown in the field.'"
Heinrich Schmid, Doctrinal Theology of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, trans., Charles A. Hay and Henry E. Jacobs, Philadelphia: United Lutheran Publication House, 1899, p. 506.

"Only little weight is attached to the ministry of the Word, to worship services, the Sacraments, to confession and absolution, and to the observance of Christian customs; a thoroughly regenerated person does not need these crutches at all. Pietism stressed the personal element over against the institutional; voluntariness versus compulsion; the present versus tradition, and the rights of the laity over against the pastors."
Martin Schmidt, "Pietism," The Encyclopedia of the Lutheran Church, 3 vols., ed. Julius Bodensieck, Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1965, III, p. 1899.

"But if ordination be understood as applying to the ministry of the Word, we are not unwilling to call ordination a sacrament. For the ministry of the Word has God's command and glorious promises. Romans 1:16 The Gospel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth. Likewise, Isaiah 55:11: So shall My Word be that goeth forth out of My mouth; it shall not return unto Me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please...And it is of advantage, so far as can be done, to adorn the ministry of the Word with every kind of praise against fanatical men, who dream that the Holy Ghost is given not through the Word, but because of certain preparations of their own...."
Apology Augsburg Confession, XIII. #11. Number/Use Sacraments Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 311. Tappert, p. 212. Heiser, p. 95. Romans 1:16; Isaiah 55:11.

"And it is of advantage, so far as can be done, to adorn the ministry of the Word with every kind of praise against fanatical men, who dream that the Holy Ghost is given not through the Word, but because of certain preparations of their own, if they sit unoccupied and silent in obscure places, waiting for illumination, as the Enthusiasts formerly taught, and the Anabaptists now teach."
Apology Augsburg Confession, XIII. #13. The Sacraments. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 311. Tappert, p. 213. Heiser, p. 95.

"This power {the Keys} is exercised only by teaching or preaching the Gospel and administering the Sacraments, according to their calling, either to many or to individuals. For thereby are granted, not bodily, but eternal things, as eternal righteousness, the Holy Ghost, eternal life. These things cannot come but by the ministry of the Word and the Sacraments, as Paul says, Romans 1:16: The Gospel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth. Therefore, since the power of the Church grants eternal things, and is exercised only by the ministry of the Word, it does not interfere with civil government; no more than the art of singing interferes with civil government."
Augsburg Confession, XXVIII. #8. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 85. Tappert, p. 82. Heiser, p. 23. Romans 1:16

"Know, therefore, that you must be concerned not only about hearing, but also about learning and retaining it in memory, and do not think that it is optional with you of no great importance, but that it is God's commandment, who will require of you how you have heard, learned, and honored His Word."
The Large Catechism, The Third Commandment, #98. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 609. Tappert, p. 378. Heiser, p. 175. Exodus 20:8-11.

Bethany Bombers (WELS terminology)


Norman Teigen has left a new comment on your post "SP Mark Schroeder - Success Perspective":

I did not know that WELS had a low regard for the Bethany program pastors. That is news to me. Can you provide any more information on this subject? Why, for example, was there such a program in the first place? I think that there might be some interesting history behind your comment.

***

GJ - The WELS pastors will say to an ELS pastor, "We cherish our fellowship with the ELS," but they won't drive a few miles for an ELS installation service. I was the only WELS pastor at one ELS installation. The congregation had a dozen WELS clergy within a short drive, but not one came. We drove up from Columbus.

The WELS pastors call their fellow pastors "Bethany Bombers" if they went through the Bethany program, which was once an alternate way to be prepared for attending The Sausage Factory. The guys who went through the official WELS system never let the Bethany program guys forget that they were third-rate (if that). I found the Bethany guys were far more Lutheran and far less brain-washed than the born-in-a-WELS-parochial-school guys.

WELS ended the Bethany program some years ago.

Baptist Theologian Takes Congregation Out of LCMS: Charges Missouri with Unionism



Kent Heimbigner, PhD (Baylor Baptist University), demonstrates the importance of removing red-eye from flash photos.
(Hint - try Picasa from Google.)


Baylor University in Waco, Texas, is a private Baptist university, and a nationally ranked liberal arts institution. Chartered in 1845 by the Republic of Texas, Baylor is the oldest, continually operating university in the state. Though 80% of our students come from within Texas, we are home to students from all 50 states, and 70 countries.


Rev. Kent A Heimbigner, Ph.D., Senior Pastor
Home: 817-426-0783
Email: icxcnika@flash.net

Pastor Kent A. Heimbigner was born on 08 October 1961 in Anaheim, CA. He was baptized in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost two weeks later, on 22 October 1961 at the Lutheran Church of Our Savior in Fullerton, CA. He was confirmed in that same congregation in 1975.

Pastor Heimbigner was installed as the Pastor of Charity Lutheran Church, Burleson, TX in October of 1997. He was ordained and installed at Grace Lutheran Church, Marlin, TX on 22 August 1990. Pr. Heimbigner served there as Pastor for seven years, prior to becoming Pastor of Charity Lutheran in Burleson.

A graduate of Point Loma College in San Diego, CA, Pr. Heimbigner earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1985. Thereafter he enrolled at Concordia Seminary in St. Louis, MO, receiving his Master of Divinity (M.Div.) degree in 1989 and a Master of Sacred Theology degree (S.T.M.) in 1991. With a concentration in Dogmatic Theology, his primary research had to do with the relation of the Office of the Holy Ministry to the celebration of the Lord's Supper in Scripture and in the early liturgical writings of the ancient church.

While serving full-time as a Pastor, Pr. Heimbigner worked part time as a student at Baylor University in Waco, TX, earning a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree in 2001, with a concentration in church history and a teaching minor in philosophy. His dissertation focused on the relation of Christ to Baptism and the Lord's Supper in selected dogmatic and devotional writings of Johann Gerhard (17th century orthodox Lutheran theologian).

As a clergyman of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod from 1990 through the end of 2008, Pr. Heimbigner served the Synod in various capacities, including being a member of the Texas District floor committee on theology and church relations for the 2003 Texas District convention, LWML zone counsellor, LFL pastoral advisor, Lutheran Music Enrichment instructor, and currently instructor for all religion and philosophy classes offered by Concordia University at Austin's extension campus in Fort Worth, TX. In November of 2008, he received the "Excellence in Teaching" award from the Commission on Accelerated Programs (CAP). Three times, he has been given the opportunity (and accepted it) to teach Reformation History at the Lutheran Theological Seminary in Novosibirsk, Siberia, Russia. Pr. Heimbigner also served on the working group for Eucharistic Liturgies in connection with the Lutheran Hymnal Project, which project has now resulted in the production of the "Lutheran Service Book."


In his community, Pr. Heimbigner has long been a member of the Rotary Club, first in Marlin and now in Burleson. He has served on the board of directors of the Burleson Rotary Club in several different capacities. Pr. Heimbigner has also served as President, Vice-President, and Treasurer of the Dallas / Fort Worth Area Metro Beekeepers' Association.

Pastor Heimbigner has published one book (a reworking of his S.T.M. thesis), and anticipates publication of his Ph.D. dissertation in the not too distant future. He has also published articles in the Lutheran Witness, Logia, TableTalk, and other venues. Pastor Heimbigner occasionally is asked to be a guest on the radio talk show Issues Etc.

Pr. Heimbigner and his wife, Denise, celebrated their 22nd anniversary in August of 2008. They have five children, and live in a home they are purchasing in north Burleson.

***

GJ - Kent was on his way out of Missouri some years ago. He has been seen around ELDONA events. His bio says he worked on the new LCMS hymnal. Will he join the Eastern Orthodox, like Fenton?

The reasons given are here.

Todd Wilken (comment) missed the ironic humor.

In His Steps (Neuhaus' Steps)



B-16, gloating.



Married priest is first in Seattle Archdiocese

By JOHN STARK
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

BELLINGHAM -- The day after his ordination as a Roman Catholic priest, the Rev. Tom McMichael stood in front of the altar at Assumption Church after Sunday Mass, while members of the congregation raised both hands in a gesture of welcome and blessing.

The welcoming of a new priest is a special moment for any church, but this moment may have been more special than most: At McMichael's side was Karin McMichael, his wife of 23 years.

McMichael, 48, is the first married priest in the Archdiocese of Seattle, which includes all of Western Washington. He and his wife have two sons, aged 19 and 21. McMichael expects to be working at Assumption part time at least until this summer, while also celebrating weekend Masses at Skagit County churches.

The Jan. 11 event was no surprise to the parish. McMichael had been on the church staff as a seminarian and deacon for several months, the culmination of a process that began in November 2005. That was when McMichael informed his congregation at Lynden's Hope Lutheran Church that he was resigning to become a Catholic.

McMichael took that step with no assurance that he would be able to continue the religious vocation he loved.

"Perhaps the most difficult part of this was giving that up, and not being sure if I would be able to continue," he said. "There was no guarantee that this door would open."

While priestly celibacy remains the rule in the Roman Catholic Church, there are exceptions. In the 1950s, McMichael said, the Roman church allowed some married Lutheran pastors in Germany to be ordained after conversion. And some small Eastern-rite churches that accept the authority of the pope have a long tradition of married priests.

In the U.S., Pope John Paul II approved the ordination of converted, married clergymen from other denominations in 1980, according to information on the archdiocese's Web site.

If some Catholic priests can have wives, why not all?

"That's not a question I can answer," McMichael said.

McMichael and every other would-be priest in his situation must apply to the Vatican for permission to be ordained, and must undergo seminary training in Catholic doctrines.

"They make it very clear ... that this is the exception," McMichael said. "The rule, if you will, in canon law is celibate clergy. But they also acknowledge the possibility of exceptions."

At present, there are somewhere around 100 such priests in the U.S., McMichael said. He doesn't think he and others like him are paving the way for the general acceptance of marriage for priests.

"It's not a step toward married clergy as the norm, and I think that's made very clear throughout the process," McMichael said.

As McMichael tells it, his transition from Lutheran to Catholic, and from Lutheran pastor to Catholic priest, was a long one.

He was born into a Swedish-rooted Lutheran congregation, where pastors and congregation are, in his words, "very comfortable with Catholic forms, with the Eucharist, with vestments, with a high view of the clergy. ... That was the kind of Lutheran I was, and the kind of Lutheran religion I was attempting to live."

He got his religious training in a seminary that included other young men training for the Catholic priesthood, and he always felt comfortable with an inclusive view of the Christian faith. As he saw it, reunification of all Christian churches was the ultimate goal, and the reunification of Lutherans with Catholics was part of that.

The Catholic Church has taken significant steps in that direction in the past 50 years, McMichael said, shifting to celebration of the Mass in local languages and working to smooth out theological differences over the role of faith, good works and divine grace in human salvation.

But as McMichael saw it, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America was moving in a different direction in the years leading up to his decision to leave, away from the traditional liturgy and becoming more "Protestant," more concerned with maintaining a separate denominational identity.

"Some of us had to deal with the question of whether we belonged," he said.

McMichael and his wife decided they didn't. Both made the conversion to the Roman Catholic Church, and both had to submit to "a stack of paperwork" as the first step toward McMichael's Catholic ordination.

"Rome, and the Archdiocese of Seattle, wanted to have a sense of who I was, and why I was coming," McMichael said.

He acknowledges that not everyone in his new church, or his old one, may be supportive of what he has done. But he has received support aplenty. Some former parishioners at Hope Lutheran went to Seattle for his ordination, and members of Assumption also have been welcoming, he said.

He said he especially values the diversity of the Catholic Church: The Assumption congregation is a rainbow of ethnic groups, income levels and theological viewpoints.

"It has been especially gratifying to be received by people who are coming from very different theological perspectives," he said. "I just rejoice in the gathering for Eucharist with this incredible diversity of people. ... "

He hopes that his own ministry will further unite, rather than divide.

"Not everyone can do what I did or would want to," he said.

UOJ Stormtroppers Getting Nervous



UOJ Stormtroopers like to remain anonymous. So do the Church and Chicanery fans. But they are really the same people.


Robert Preus
"But the imputation of Christ's righteousness to the sinner takes place when the Holy Spirit brings him to faith through Baptism and the Word of the Gospel. Our sins were imputed to Christ at His suffering and death, imputed objectively after He, by His active and passive obedience, fulfilled and procured all righteousness for us. But the imputation of His righteousness to us takes place when we are brought to faith." [procured in italics in text]
Robert D. Preus, Justification and Rome, St. Louis: Concordia Academic Press 1997, p. 72.

Abraham Calov: "Although Christ has acquired for us the remission of sins, justification, and sonship, God just the same does not justify us prior to our faith. Nor do we become God's children in Christ in such a way that justification in the mind of God takes place before we believe." [Apodixis Articulorum Fide, Lueneburg, 1684]
Robert D. Preus, Justification and Rome, St. Louis: Concordia Academic Press 1997, p. 131n.

Lenski
"The danger is that by use of the term 'subjective justification' we may lose the objective divine act of God by which He declares the individual sinner righteous ex pistews pistin in the instant faith (embracing Christ) is wrought in him, leaving only the one divine declaration regarding the whole world of sinners, calling this an actus simplex, the only forensic act of God, and expanding this to mean that God declared every sinner free from guilt when Christ was raised from the dead, so many millions even before they were born, irrespective of faith, apart from and without faith. This surely wipes out 'justification by faith alone.' Only his faith is reckoned to him for righteousness."
R. C. H. Lenski, Interpretation of Romans, Augsburg Publishing House: Minneapolis, 1963 p. 85. Romans 1:17.

"Nowhere in the bible is any man constituted or declared righteous without faith, before faith; all asservations and argumentations to the contrary notwithstanding." Lenski, Romans, p. 382? Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 86.

"As to the doctrine in general, he [Lenski] repudiates and ridicules the teaching that on Easter morning God forgave, really forgave, all the world all its sins, really and truly justified the world. He protests against making objective reconciliation, general justification, mean that God on Easter morning did actually pronounce the world, all individuals making up the world, really innocent of all sin and guilt."
Theodore Engelder, Objective Justification, Concordia Theological Monthly, 1933, Ft. Wayne: Concordia Seminary Press, n.d. p. 508. 2 Corinthians 5:18-20.

***

GJ - And yet the dual justification scheme can be found - in Pietism, before C. F. W. Walther adopted the nonsense of everyone forgiven without the Word, without the Means of Grace, without faith.

Church and Chicanery Trademark -
Permission Required for Use




The Church and Chicanery Board, by a vote of 6-1, has graciously allowed me to use their official trademark, Busta Gut. I think Ski held out, something about hurting Babtist feelings. Kelm is worried about the image being borrowed.
Doebler said, "What's wrong with copying cool graphics?"



Anonymous said...:

Making a charge stick against the C&Cers will prove next to impossible when it comes to heresy. C&Cers can bob and weave, rationalize, and mislead with the best since facts and reasoning must be checked at the door. The insidious harm comes in shifting the focus from the efficacy of the Word to the efficacy of marketing and buildings while draining WELS’ coffers. They threaten to render the synod anemic and unable to continue

January 23, 2009 4:04 PM
Freddy Finkelstein said...:

For what it is worth, I'll agree: there is little to celebrate, other than the fact that Synod has finally and officially opened the matter to discussion. But to say they won't find “scriptural reasons to condemn” the importation of sectarian worship practices is to miss the point. The COP is correct. The issues involved are extremely complex, and the concerns regarding so-called “non-traditional” worship do not boil down to a matter of opinion. This is the tired line that finally failed – the COP admitted that the “underpinnings of this 'non-traditional' type of worship cannot be ignored.” The “underpinnings” are not a matter of opinion, but a matter of grave concern. Moreover, these concerns are not satiated by a congregation's casual explanation that they “follow a lose liturgical framework based on the Western Rite, and don't really rock-out” in the Divine Service.

The point is, not only the Scriptures, but the Lutheran Confessions will play a direct and decisive role in deciding this matter. At its foundation the very nature of Confessionalism and the Confessional Principle is at stake, as is a distinction between merely rhetorical unity and true (visible) Unity in doctrine and practice, along with the breadth of this unity with respect to our catholicity. The efficacy of the Means of Grace is at stake, particularly with regard to the troubling fixation and reliance on statistical measures and human methods that assault the Means and very much seem to overshadow them. Fellowship is at stake, not only regarding open association with groups like Willow Creek, but the unmistakable overtures of Fellowship that result from adopting the worship forms of heterodox pop-church Evangelicals. The disruption of christocentric focus in liturgical worship is at issue, especially considering the anthropocentric nature of these sectarian innovations -- which also introduces consideration of the falsehoods that sectarian worship forms inevitably teach to those who practice them. And so, lex orandi, lex credendi also enters the picture, not only from the standpoint of orthodox practice but also that of Fellowship with the heterodox.

But who knows, Tim may well be right. The Synod in Convention recently resolved to merely “recommend” that Lutheran congregations retain the term “Lutheran” in their name – a recommendation roundly ignored by those the resolution was intended to address – begging the question, “How can a congregation which subscribes to the Lutheran Confessions be Lutheran in everything but name?” Subscription to the Confessions, along with many other things, is a declaration of identity! We must all be diligent to ensure that the next time the Synod in Convention has the opportunity to act, we are not forced to subsequently ask the question, “How can a congregation which subscribes to the Lutheran Confessions be Lutheran in everything but name and practice?” For all the work that has resulted in the COP's official recognition of this issue, the real work lies ahead.
Freddy Finkelstein

January 23, 2009 5:41 PM
Freddy Finkelstein said...:

And I forgot, in my previous post, at least three other issues related the mess created by CG Church Changers and so-called “non-traditional” worship: (1) the tension created by a call to Divine Worship, that can only be directed to believers, while at the same time consulting unbelievers and accommodating their demands with respect to the ordering of the Divine Service (i.e., church practice) as if they are included in such a call; (2) the nature and extent of Public Ministry and the role of supposed lay “Worship Ministers;" and, (3), directly related to this is the true role of women in congregational ministry, especially those who are positioned in the worship chamber during the Divine Service, either singly or together with an ensemble, specifically to draw attention to themselves, that as objects of attention they may more effectively make use of the Keys in ministering to the congregation in word and song. Are such worshipers Public Ministers? Then why are women involved in preaching to the congregation in word and song? Are such ensembles merely co-worshipers? Then why are they positioned and functioning to address the congregation at all? (If one reads Kretzmann's Christian Art one will readily see the position of Lutherans at his time and before -- the notion of Lutheran "Worship Ministers" is directly rejected).

There are probably many other issues, but these at least are sufficient to recognize the complexities involved.
Freddy Finkelstein

January 23, 2009 7:46 PM
Anonymous said...:

Will WELS deal with the C&C issues? While it generally skirts issues, how far will it let the camel's nose of the C&Cers go under the tent flap before tearing down the tent?

January 24, 2009 8:16 AM
Anonymous said...:

The coffee church in Waunakee already has a woman pastor who "administers the Means of Grace."
Bespoke

January 24, 2009 9:15 AM
Anonymous said...:

"The coffee church in Waunakee already has a woman pastor who 'administers the Means of Grace.'"

So? The WELS has long admitted women to the Office of the Holy Ministry.

January 24, 2009 10:50 AM

---


Rev. Kristen proves what I predicted long ago - WELS would be the first after ELCA to ordain women. All the Church and Chicanery leaders need Worship Leaders. What is the pastoral ministry?


As Staff Minister of Worship, Kristen is responsible for planning and implementing all worship opportunities at St. Andrew. She also oversees the large corps of worship volunteers who serve in many and varied capacities each week. Music is the largest part of the worship ministry at St. Andrew, but the worship ministry also includes lay readers, dramatic and visual arts, hospitality ministries and audio/visual tech support. Kristen works closely with Pastor Hunter to study and understand biblical worship principles and practices, evaluate current worship practices at St. Andrew, and define future directions for St. Andrew’s worship ministry.

Kristen graduated from Wisconsin Lutheran College in 2003 with a B.A. in Psychology and minors in Communication and Theology. While at WLC she worked for two years in the Campus Ministry Office planning and implementing daily chapel services, organizing various musical groups for worship, and learning from Campus Pastor Nathan Strobel. She is currently pursuing Staff Ministry certification from Martin Luther College.

Kristen grew up in the Pacific Northwest and always intended to return there after college, but God had other plans for her. He has planted her firmly in the family of faith at St. Andrew and for this she is truly and deeply grateful. When she’s not writing services or running rehearsals, Kristen spends her time reading science fiction and classic literature, playing piano, writing music, taking long walks in good weather, staying connected with friends and family, and generally enjoying life.

“The best part of my job is knowing that my work directly impacts the spiritual lives of those who worship here and enables them to connect with God. I say this with a full and complete understanding (and appreciation!) of the fact that the actual work is done by the Holy Spirit through the means of grace – but it is a great privilege and a great joy to be an instrument in ‘administering God’s grace’ in the form of worship gatherings. The second most rewarding aspect of my work is assisting all sorts of members of the congregation in bringing their gifts to God and to each other as joyful offerings. How exciting it is to see brothers and sisters in Christ – of all ages! – learning and working together to serve God and His people. The interpersonal connections made and the spiritual lessons learned through this ministry are invaluable blessings from our gracious God.”

The Minister of Worship can be contacted online.

Friday, January 23, 2009

The Rules versus The Synod Rules



The charges are definitely stickical,
When all the rules followed are Biblical.


Anonymous said...(Bailing Water:

Making a charge stick against the Church and Changers will prove next to impossible when it comes to heresy. C&Cers can bob and weave, rationalize, and mislead with the best since facts and reasoning must be checked at the door. The insidious harm comes in shifting the focus from the efficacy of the Word to the efficacy of marketing and buildings while draining WELS’ coffers. They threaten to render the synod anemic and unable to continue

January 23, 2009 4:04 PM

***

GJ - Yes and no. I have heard this excuse before. I was able to prove Floyd Luther Stolzenburg a heretic with one question - "If an evangelism effort fails, is it because the wrong methods were used?"

Stolzenburg jumped in and said, "Yes!" and began to explain.

DP Mueller said, "No," only to have Kuske jump in and defend Floyd's doctrine, as he always did.

Mueller had to talk over his vapid VP and point out the Biblical doctrine of the Word.

Previously, Mueller promised that if I proved Stolzenburg a heretic, LPR would be shut down.

Nothing of the sort happened. Instead, Mueller, Kuske, and Schroer all insisted that it never happened. At another meeting to silence me, Schroer said, disingenuously, "I have nothing in my notes."

Their problem was that I told a lot of people what happened, so the officials were caught in another lie. But what was one more lie in a string of them?

Zehms and Stolzenburg--aided and abetted by Mueller-Kuske--caused so much damage in Colubmus with their precious Church Growth Movement that LRP was finally shut down. The goal all along, as Wally Oelhafen explained, was to get Floyd a call in the Wisconsin Synod. No effort was spared. Wally, with "I love CGM" tatooed on his right deltoid, was in Kuske's corner.

So they supported Stolzenburg in getting a call to an independent Lutheran congregation. He is still there.

The moral of this story is - it depends on which rules are followed. The Wisconsin sect has a thousand unspoken but understood rules. If purely doctrinal questions are asked and follow up questions are permitted, the heretics could be identified in a few minutes.

For instance, Kelm has paraded his love of Reformed doctrine for decades. At 64, is he going to find a way out of his published errors? Why is he in fellowship with the Willow Creek Association? WELS supposedly left unionism in the 19th century. Kelm and Parlow brought it back officially at St. Mark, Depere. Trapp did the same at his Willow Creek franchise, jointly operated by WELS.

Bruce Becker has attacked the efficacy of the Word alone. One of his latest communications asked congregations what worked in addition to the Word. He insisted on hiring Kelm and adding to the synod's financial burdens.

When the synod politicians start explaining how difficult it is to deal with a pastoral adulterer (with clout) or a heretic, the sect rules are being followed. So this will really depend on which rules are normative.

WELS Layman Questions



The marks (notae) of Pietism.



Dear Dr. Jackson,

Greetings, from yet another disgruntled WELS layman. I wasn’t sure how to ask you a long question on theology. Do you like them to be asked through Ichabod? Anyway, I really appreciate your hard work: you have done a great service to laymen everywhere who would otherwise be left in the dark. I am very close to leaving the synod, but, for some reason, I have gotten hung up on how justification relates to election. I’m not sure if that should hinder my withdrawal; I suppose, if the WELS is suffering from a specific false doctrine which they’ll never change, that would make me lose more hope than if they were just suffering from pietism.

I have read TSW, especially chapter five, quite thoroughly. I think I am close to understanding justification. What made me think about justification in relation to election was a little reference in an article by Jacob A. O. Preus, “Martin Chemnitz on the Doctrine of Justification,” http://www.wlsessays.net/files/PreusChemnitz.pdf on p. 7,

[The Council of] Trent urged that “justification does not consist only in the remission of sins and free reconciliation, but it also includes the renewal of the mind and the will through the Holy Spirit.” This, of course, is a perversion of the distinction between law and Gospel and makes our justification before God contingent in part on our obedience to the law. It was this very error, creeping back into Lutheranism, which caused Walther, Pieper, H. A. Preus, and others to stress the objective aspect of reconciliation and justification.

But, with my resources limited to the WLS essay file on the web (and Ichabod, of course) I cannot find any reference as to how the Election Controversy led Missouri and the WELS to stress objective justification, at least in WELS essays. (I know you have been focusing on A. Hoenecke’s historical connection to UOJ on Ichabod, but in other essays dealing with the controversy, he isn’t even quoted mentioning justification at all. So could it have been that important to them?) I know that this is the one of the most difficult areas of theology, where we reach the obvious limitations of our reason and the revealed will of God. But none the less, it was important enough for Lenski to write against, and since few understand him today as well as you do, I would like to ask you the following:

Should your view of election affect your view of justification?

Do you agree with the stance that Lenski and the Ohio synod took in the Election controversy?

Or was he wrong on election, and right on Justification?

Here are some quotes that I have found in two WELS essays on the subject:

From The Election Controversy in the Synodical Conference By R. Dennis Rardin: http://www.wlsessays.net/files/RardinElection.pdf p. 32.

Lenski’s rejection of objective or universal justification results from his belief in election iniuitu fidei. Calling faith a cause or condition of election warps its role as purely an organon leptikon. Lenski simply gave faith the same role in justification as he gave it in election—to him it became a cause or condition of justification.

From The Doctrine of Conversion By T.R. Adascheck: http://www.wlsessays.net/files/AdascheckDoctrine.PDF p. 2

The Ohio and Iowa Synods also taught that man's conversion was entirely due to the grace of God. But they limited this grace. They taught that it was effective only in those who offered natural resistance to God's grace, while it was ineffective in those who offered willful resistance.

p.3:
Dr. Lenski repeatedly uses the expression "natural and willful" resistance. They teach that natural resistance is present with all men when the grace of God approaches, but this natural resistance can be overcome by the Holy Ghost. It is not obstacle to conversion. But willful resistance that they define as a mysterious wickedness that goes beyond the natural depravity of man, the Holy Ghost cannot overcome.

On the Chronicle of the Predestinarian Conflict By G.Fritschel as quoted and translated by a seminary student http://www.wlsessays.net/files/SchroederHoenecke.pdf on p. 19

Fritschel is commenting on Hoenecke’s second thesis of election which is: “2. The eternal election of God is the cause of the faith of the elect.”

However, the election did not happen in view of the faith of the elect. One sees (here most decidedly Missouri’s doctrine is pronounced) that not the general gracious will of God concerning all men, but the special grace of election of only a certain few is designated as the source from which faith flows forth. The result is that those who are not predestined cannot even come to faith; and one sees therefore that it was completely true, when Prof. Loy explained in The Lutheran Standard that the second thesis contained “an open denial of Lutheran doctrine.”

It is interesting to note that in the two articles by Hoenecke included in this student’s paper, not one mention is made of Objective Justification. The first article is from the Gemeinde-Blatt in 1878, Volume 13, Number 9. “Wenn Gott allein die Menschen bekehren kann und muß und solches thut ohne des Menschen Zuthun, woher kommt es denn, daß so viele Menschen unbekehrt bleiben?” and the other article is from the April 15, 1880 issue of Evangelish-Lutherisches Gemeinde Blatt, Volume 15, Number 16. entitled “Zur Lehre von der Gnadenwahl.”

Thanks,

WELS Layman

***

GJ - I would not be in a hurry to quit WELS over this issue. Many laymen are well read on this subject and forcing the issue. Besides, the other synods are also wedded to UOJ through Walther and Pieper. Hoenecke has been largely ignored, especially by WELS. If they take any longer to translate his slender Dogmatik, it will be too late. Christ will return sooner than they can finish.

Lenski did not agree with OJ at all. As he wrote, no one is justified--apart from faith--in the Bible.

A researcher I know has already found the two justifications in a Pietistic dogmatics book widely used in Germany and America, in use in English for about 60 years in America. There are earlier instances, my scholarly friend says. I do not have all the material, which will be revealed in the fullness of time.

Simply put, the two justifications are not found in the Bible, Luther, the Book of Concord, Chemnitz, Melanchthon, or the later orthodox theologians. What Jack Preus wrote is pure hooey. Robert Preus finally backed away from UOJ in his final book.

I will write a book on this, but not in 2009. I am trying to gather background information now.

I hope my review of the History of Pietism will help provide more insights about this. There may be some synodical exceptions, but I think all the Lutherans in America passed through Pietism before coming here, and many stayed with it. That started with the Muhlenberg tradition (ULCA, LCA) and continued with Scandinavian Lutheran migration and the LCMS.

Because of Pietism, the efficacy of the Word in the Means of Grace was neglected, even ignored, in the Synodical Conference.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Coming Soon - Review, Deutschlander's Theology of the Cross



This book is better than any Lutheran could expect or hope.


I just received a review copy of Deutschlander's Theology of the Cross. This is a theology book for all synods and for all denominations. I think it will become a classic, like Krauth's Conservative Reformation.

I will write a review as soon as I finish the book.

Northwestern Publishing House is to be commended for offering a masterpiece like this in time for Lent.

---

The Theology of the Cross
Reflections on His Cross and Ours
Series: Impact Series
Daniel M. Deutschlander

A book on Christian doctrine that reminds readers that all biblical doctrine relates to Scripture's central teaching that God sent his Son to save lost sinners. The Old and New Testaments make it clear that our salvation is found in the cross of Christ. However, there is a seeming paradox between the theology of the cross and the theology of glory. Sinful people tend to overlook the cross and its demands and, instead, focus on the glory that they think they should now enjoy because they call themselves Christians. This is a matter of urgent concern. Deutschlander helps us to see Christ's cross as our cross. He reminds us that our good works have no value for our salvation. Yet good works are valuable as fruits of faith done out of gratitude to God for his gift of salvation. It deepens our understanding and appreciation for God's gift of life in Christ. It warns us of Satan's efforts to turn us from Christ to ourselves. It comforts us with the assurance that the cross of Christ leads to heavenly glory. Softcover, Size is 5 3/8" x 8.5" inches, 292 Pages. Published 2008.

Review by Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary Professor James Korthals.

Catalog Item Number: OL-150746. Order at: (800) 662-6022.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Coming Soon - Review, Deutschlander's Theology of ...":

I'm looking forward to reading this. I would encourage everyone to listen to Prof. Deutschlander's lecture on the Western Rite: Its Development and Rich History and its Relevance for Our Worship Life Today. It's in two parts on the Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary web site.

http://www.wlsessays.net/node/2047


http://www.wlsessays.net/node/2048

***

GJ - I suggest ordering early - as many as needed, because the initial printing will sell out as soon as people catch on. I hope CPH has the sense to offer it through their catalogue, perhaps to atone for other offerings of the past.

This book would be great for adult Bible studies, for Lenten series, for pastoral study clubs, for confirmation gifts, and for any occasion gifts.

PSST - For those of you who like to plagiarize sermons: Here is a great place to start. There is even a Lenten series appendix in the back. Go ahead. You know how to do it. Just give credit where it is due this time. Thanks Paul, Ski, John, and Matt.

SP Mark Schroeder - Success Perspective




How do you define success?

President Mark Schroeder

By most standards, his ministry was not much of a success.

Becoming a pastor or a missionary was never in his plans. In fact, it was the farthest thing from his mind. Preparing himself for a high-powered secular career, he attended a prestigious university. But sometime later, in spite of his reluctance, his mind was changed. God called him into the ministry.

From almost the beginning he was embroiled in public controversies and disagreements with his co-workers and fellow believers. He never stayed long in any one congregation. No matter where he went, there were those who had no use for him and who did all they could to make his life and work miserable. Often he would leave for his next congregation quickly, painfully aware that not everyone appreciated his efforts.

He never viewed himself as a particularly gifted preacher; he often stated that he was not up to the task either in terms of his speaking skills or his ability to craft well-reasoned and logical arguments. He looked at his own personal failures and remarked to himself and others that he was not worthy to be doing this work. He struggled continually with some kind of ailment, either mental or physical or spiritual, that made his life and work difficult (although he didn’t mention what it was). In one congregation he served, some of the members reinforced his views of himself, making it clear that they much preferred the pastor who followed him.

Throughout his ministry disagreements with co-workers would continue. They would argue and disagree about the strategy and direction that the ministry should take. Sometimes the disagreements were harsh and personal. Some of his closest friends and co-workers actually abandoned him when he needed them most.

One congregation seemed to fall apart shortly after he left, with members becoming tolerant of open immoral behavior, quarreling with each other, and easily adopting teachings and doctrines that were not true.

In the end, he died alone, and the world did not much notice.

His was not a very successful ministry -- unless you measure “success” in ministry by other standards. The pastor and missionary whose career had little going for it on the surface was, in fact , the greatest missionary that this world has seen. This pastor, judged to be a failure by any human standards, was the Apostle Paul.

Paul would agree that his personal abilities and accomplishments were few and far between. But he did not – nor should we -- measure the success of his ministry in those terms. This was the man who recognized that the words he preached were not his words; they were the words of God himself. He recognized that the power of his message was not in himself, but in the gospel of Jesus Christ. He had no desire for his ministry to be measured in terms of human glory or accomplishment ; his was a ministry of the cross, proclaiming that God’s way of saving people through the cross, while foolish to the world, was nothing less than the wisdom and power and love of God. Paul’s purpose was not to meet the “felt needs” of people, but to lead them to see their real need: the need for forgiveness and redemption from a Savior who bled and died on the cross. His mission was not to make the church grow in terms of numbers; his mission was to pummel hardened sinners with God’s law in all its condemning force, and to follow with the precious news of forgiveness bought and paid for with the blood of the Son of God. He knew that his role was to plant the seed with the Word of God and that others would water the seed the same Word. But his confidence rested in knowing that it was God and God alone who would make it grow.

What kind of pastor do you want to serve as the shepherd of your congregation? A powerful and dynamic speaker who draws people by the sheer force of his personality? Someone with fantastic organizational skills? Someone who is up on all the latest techniques for connecting with people? Someone who seems to be “successful?” Or would you prefer someone like the Apostle Paul: always preaching Christ, always pointing to the cross, always demonstrating a love for souls by faithful proclamation of law and gospel?

Success, I suppose, all depends on how you define it.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "SP Mark Schroeder - Success Perspective":

Interesting that Joe Krohn is silent when it comes to Pres. Schroeder's perspective.

I wonder if he is worried his church will be bounced from the syond. Then again the COP called for the ad hoc committee and the DPs are the ones who have allowed free reign for the Rock and Roll churches.

---

Bailing Water comments:

Anonymous said...
I like President Schroeder and hope he can, with God's help and the support of the members, root out the liberals who've infested our synod.

January 22, 2009 6:38 PM
Anonymous said...
Wow - what a relief this article is, and thanks for posting it. I haven't read the Feb. issue of FIC.

I'm sure Prez. S. will rattle a few cages with this article.

I am wondering who will be placed on the ad hoc. I'm sure there will be a lot of political manuevering by the C&Cers.

January 22, 2009 8:10 PM

***

GJ - Don't worry, when Gunga Don Patterson gets done with his latest zebra-hunting trip, he will advise Doctrinal Pussycat Glaeske on the things he can say - to appear critical of Church and Change. Yes indeed, one WELS leader told me about Glaeske actually saying something critical once. A second pronouncement is somewhere on the Net: I copied it to Ichabod.

The DPs have done nothing so far, but they are starting to feel the utter disgust of the congregations and one segment of the ministerium. There are some pastors in WELS who have studied the Confessions and the Scriptures. The best way to find them is to search the backwaters of WELS. The best calls were handed to Church Growth zombies for decades. How well has that worked?

Here is one little example of Church Growth at work. Curt Peterson came to WELS from Missouri, loving the Church Growth Movement. WELS treats colloquy pastors as lepers, even lower than Bethany program pastors. Yet Curt was immediately on the world missions board with Valleskey and in a large congregation in Milwaukee. Coincidence? Nevertheless, God's justice eventually reveals itself. Curt, after complaining bitterly about criticism of the Church Growth Movement, became an atheist and joined Freedom From Religion - as a former conservative Lutheran pastor.

Valleskey has quite the touch. I was told his hand-picked successor at Apostles had to leave the ministry, due to depression.

I said, "Oh? What was her name?"

My informant said, "Who told you?"

Chemnitz: "The devil breaks wind before leaving the room"




Anonymous has left a new comment on your post ""Doom Has Come Upon Us All! Behold, Lutherans Emph...":

Ooh...I'm really scared now. (insert cutesy pic here) I have yet to see an arguement (sic) on here that proves (scripturally) that C&C is in error. It is all random rhetoric, hyperbole, speculation and lies. (insert another cutesy pic here with cutesy mis-spelled caption)

What a joke.

***

GJ - Chemnitz quoted an old proverb about an mephitic decree from the Council of Trent, "They say the devil always breaks wind before leaving the room."

The Change and Chicanery leaders wanted to strut around, leading people to and fro. They put their names out on the Internet, bragging on their websites, and filled the ether with their odious secret emails. But they howled when people began reading the truth about them.

With not a drop of martyr's blood in their own veins, Church and Chicanery leaders have been bleeding foundations dry to support false doctrine from Fuller and Willow Creek. St. Mark, Depere, the Mother Church of C and C, is a member of the Willow Creek Association. They are rolling in loot because they have the answers, so why do they need money? They should be giving, not taking.

St. Marcus hides the name Lutheran for its television show, which God has blessed with everything but money and sound doctrine. "I have been young and now am old, but I have never seen the righteous go hungry or his children begging for bread." That verse works the other way too. St. Marcus and St. Mark (the odd couple of C and C) beg for a reason.

If these congregations are so successful, as they crow, why are they so dependent on foundation grants and charity from the synod? VP Patterson should be ashamed to have his well established congregation begging the synod to pay for his vicars.

Everywhere I look, I see Church and Chicanery leaders with their hands out, looking for a hand-out. They are not givers but takers. They absorb vast amounts of Love Shack salary and benefits while driving the synod down financially and numerically - but in the name of growth! Even at Citibank, with $2 trillion in assets, that kind of growth gets a doofus fired.

If these C and C leaders (Doebler, Kelm, Parlow) know so much, as they claim, why do they need to crib their sermon material from false teachers? Like most plagiarists, their laziness (spiritual sloth) is exceeded only by their dunderhead assumptions.

We can find the originals of the sermons they copied from the Internet. We can find the same artwork. Worst of all, we can find the same doctrine.

I predict that some (not all) the congregations will leave WELS for the LCMS. They will make a big stink before they leave, as Chemnitz suggested.

Kieschnick eats up this stuff, loving women's ordination more than Church and Change.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Chemnitz: "The devil breaks wind before leaving th...":

Hmmm....not much strutting going with you Mr. Ichabod, is there? What a putz....It's interesting, all of your arguments could actually be turned around on you and all the Ichabodians. Now that is food for thought. How many folks are in your parish again, Greg? Ooh. That's gonna leave a mark.

***

GJ - We broadcast to the world for free and make the files available to everyone. The exact number is no one's concern, certainly not mine. We have regular participants from one coast to another, and that astonishes me.

Some recent anonymous (what else?) claims have been:

1. No one reads Ichabod, except A. Nony Mouse on a daily basis. So do I generate the world map through secret software known only to me?
2. I invent positive comments and publish them myself. Sure, I also make up the names of Lutheran laymen who post. And I create the followers list on my own too.
3. Plus - "I don't believe this," and "You haven't proven that." The answer is - find another site, such as Oprah's or ELCA's, and find satisfaction there.

Thanks again, Mouse, for confirming that Ichabod is a thorn in your side.

"Doom Has Come Upon Us All!
Behold, Lutherans Emphasizing the Biblical Means of Grace!"



How many Rock and Roll WELS churches would there be
without grant money?


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "We Built This Synod on Rock and Roll":

Very funny parody. Word has it that the Rock and Roll church did get a partial grant.

Also, the C&Cers (Kelm, Parlow, Hunter, Gunn, Patterson, Becker, & others) are in alarmist mode about the latest from Pres. Schroeder.

Looks like the fireworks will be going off soon.

***

GJ - Faithful Lutherans - post your comments about this news, so people can tell where the real support is. More importantly, study what Freddy Finkelstein wrote earlier and follow his advice.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "SP Mark Schroeder - Success Perspective":

I have it from a reliable source that the COP's latest conference was actually in Texas and not far from the Rock and Roll church in Round Rock. Matt Doebler was in attendance even. I also have it from a reliable source that Christ the Rock will be having a worship service this Sunday. Seems CTR is actually preaching the Word of God in it's (sic) truth and purity.

These are interesting, anonymous, misspelled claims. Doubtless Gunga Don Patterson ran interference for Doebler. They may have a common affection for Mars Hill Church preaching. However, being at a COP meeting does not suggest orthodoxy. Instead, it suggests questions being asked.

Today I had major problems getting to the Rock and Roll Church website. The website crashes. Anyone else?

We Built This Synod on Rock and Roll



The original.


Joseph F. Schmidt's excellent parody:

Chorus:
We built this synod, we built this synod on Rock and Roll
Built this synod, we built this synod on Rock and Roll

Say you don’t know me or recognize my face,
Say you don’t care who goes to that kind of place.
Knee deep in the hoopla sinking in your fight,
Too many Fuller grads eating up the night.

Joey plays the mamba, listen to the radio, don’t you remember
We built this synod, we built this synod on Rock and Roll.

Chorus:
We built this synod, we built this synod on Rock and Roll,
Built this synod, we built this synod on Rock and Roll.

Someone always playing corporation games,
Who cares they’re always changing corporation names.
We just want to dance here someone stole the stage,
They call us irresponsible write us off the page.

Joey plays the mamba, listen to the radio, don’t you remember,
We built this synod, we built this synod on Rock and Roll.

We built this synod, we built this synod on Rock and Roll,
Built this synod, we built this synod on Rock and Roll.

Its just another Sunday, in a tired old street.
Doctrine’s got the choke hold, oh then we just lost the beat.

Who counts the money underneath the bar?
Who rides the wrecking ball in two rock guitars?
Don’t tell us you need us, cuz we're the ship of fools
Looking for America, embedded in your schools.

Don’t you remember (member)(member)

Joey plays the mamba, listen to the radio, don’t you remember,
We built this synod, we built this synod on Rock and Roll.

We built this synod, we built this synod on Rock and Roll,
Built this synod, we built this synod on Rock and Roll,
Built this synod, we built this synod on Rock and Roll,
Built this synod, we built this synod on Rock and Roll.

(we built, we built this synod) built this synod (we built, we built this synod).




VP Patterson's Rock and Roll Church in Round Rock has a group called Little Rockers. Do they teach toddlers how to snort coke and trash hotel suites?

The new sermon series is shamelessly borrowed from Mars Hill.

Joe Krohn likes to post all the time and even has his own blog to defend and promote Rock and Roll Churches?

Did they get the grant, Joe? $200,000 from Antioch?



Mark Driscoll of Mars Hill, preaching.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

The Grocery Bagger and Check Out Girl



This is a true story.

KURTIS THE STOCK BOY AND BRENDA THE CHECKOUT GIRL

In a supermarket, Kurtis the stock boy, was busily working when a new voice came over the loud speaker asking for a carry out at register 4. Kurtis was almost finished, and wanted to get some fresh air, and decided to answer the call. As he approached the check-out stand a distant smile caught his eye, the new check-out girl was beautiful. She was an older woman (maybe 26, and he was only 22) and he fell in love.

Later that day, after his shift was over, he waited by the punch clock to find out her name. She came into the break room, smiled softly at him, took her card and punched out, then left. He looked at her card, BRENDA. He walked out only to see her start walking up the road. Next day, he waited outside as she left the supermarket, and offered her a ride home. He looked harmless enough, and she accepted. When he dropped her off, he asked if maybe he could see her again, outside of work. She simply said it wasn't possible.

He pressed and she explained she had two children and she couldn't afford a baby-sitter, so he offered to pay for the baby-sitter. Reluctantly she accepted his offer for a date for the following Saturday. That Saturday night he arrived at her door only to have her tell him that she was unable to go with him. The baby-sitter had called and canceled. To which Kurtis simply said, "Well, let's take the kids with us."

She tried to explain that taking the children was not an option, but again not taking no for an answer, he pressed. Finally Brenda, brought him inside to meet her children. She had an older daughter who was just as cute as a bug, Kurtis thought, then Brenda brought out her son, in a wheelchair. He was born a paraplegic with Down Syndrome.

Kurtis asked Brenda, "I still don't understand why the kids can't come with us?" Brenda was amazed. Most men would run away from a woman with two kids, especially if one had disabilities - just like her first husband and father of her children had done. Kurtis was not ordinary - - - he had a different mindset.

That evening Kurtis and Brenda loaded up the kids, went to dinner and the movies. When her son needed anything Kurtis would take care of him. When he needed to use the restroom, he picked him up out of his wheelchair, took him and brought him back. The kids loved Kurtis. At the end of the evening, Brenda knew this was the man she was going to marry and spend the rest of her life with.

A year later, they were married and Kurtis adopted both of her children. Since then they have added two more kids.

So what happened to Kurtis the stock boy and Brenda the check-out girl? Well, Mr. & Mrs. Kurt Warner now live in Arizona. If you tune in on 1 February ,

you can watch him quarterback the Arizona Cardinals in the Super Bowl against the

Pittsburg Steelers! Is this a surprise ending or could you have guessed that he was

not an ordinary person? Some athletes are also great people.

It should be noted that he also quarterbacked the Rams in Super Bowl XXXVI.

He has also been the NLF's Most Valuable Player twice and the Super Bowl's MVP.

Snopes has an alternate version of this story.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Welcome DK



Rose by Norma Boeckler


On the list of those who follow Ichabod is DK, who reads such books as Albert Howard's work on Soil and Health, plus another fine book - The Plowman's Folly. Howard is the first of the organic gardening authors, in history and the estimation of others. Folly is a great book on rethinking modern agricultural practices.

CGM Troglodytes: The Sausage Factory, Class of 1970



John Huebner, Board Member, Church and Change.



Wayne Mueller taught at The Sausage Factory, became head of Parish Services (a job created for him), and became First VP of WELS. One of the first Church Growth gurus of WELS, he denied there was any CG in WELS.



Ron Ash, chairman of the board, Church and Change, godfather of Ski's latest cool adventure: CORE.




Harry Hagedorn has been head of American missions forever.
Like Norm Berg before him,
he has championed all the fads of Fuller Seminary and Willow Creek:
open communion, women teaching men, felt needs, non-Lutheran worship.



Paul Kelm, 64, is the elder statesman of Reformed doctrine in WELS. Always in trouble but never out of an influential job, Kelm is back at The Love Shack, proving "a dog returns to his vomit." (2 Peter 2:22)


---

James Radloff and David Valleskey, both Church Growth gushers, were in the class of 1962.

Some interesting associations can be found in the class of 1971: Richard Stadler, John Trapp, Forrest Bivens, Adolph Harstad, and John Brug. The doctrinal attitudes of this group run from "No problems with women's ordination" (Brug) to double back-flips for Church Growth (Bivens, who went to Fuller Seminary before he never went to Fuller Seminary).

The Sausage Factory, Class of 82



Peter Pan-denominational is now a chaplain. He extols The Simple Church.


Only a True Blue WELS pastor can appreciate the meaning of graduating in the same class from The Sausage Factory, where souls are fused together through the sadistic secret rituals of GA.

This may just be a coincidence, but here are a few graduates of The Class of 1982:

  • Peter Panitzke, Church and Change.
  • Jeff Gunn, Crosswalk - Church and Change.
  • Paul Jahnke, the Doctrinal Pussycat who let Gunn's stealth church alone while he fired other pastors. He was asked to vacate the episcopal chair.
  • James Mattek - WLCFS CEO: Patterson is on the board.
  • Michael Albrecht - Helped Stadler take their congregation out of WELS.
  • Mark Freier - Crossroads, S. Lyon, Michigan. CGM star of WELS: no longer Lutheran.
  • Bruce Becker - Church and Change board member, WELS Parish Services top dog.
  • Kingpins of Church and Change



    ELS Pastor Nathan Krause used to prop up the Concordia Triglotta on his desk each morning at The Sausage Factory and rest his chin on it, to sleep. Class of '87.



    Two board members of Church and Chicanery are from St. Marcus' staff, no surprise to Mark Jeske.



    Parish Services is the Magna Cloaca of Church Growth at The Love Shack, and Bruce Becker gets big bucks to run it. He is also a board member of Church and Change, so WELS pays him a princely salary to destroy Lutheran doctrine. How cool is that? as Ski would say.



    WELS funded Church and Change, which first met at John Parlow's church, I believe. Parlow--photographed at a Babtist conference--graduated from The Sausage Factory in 87, just like Krause above. Some other CGM stars from that class: Bill Favorite (Crosswalk, Phoenix); Randy Cutter (Florida CG disaster, no longer Lutheran); Rick Miller (founder of Mueller-Kuske's Crossroads Community Church in S. Lyon, Michigan). Wayne Mueller and David Valleskey were both on the faculty.



    Gunga Don Patterson, VP of a Babtist district with DP Glaeske. WELS members wish the two would grow a pair...of spines, and insist on Lutheran doctrine and worship. Who got the Rock and Roll Church started?


    ---

    GJ - These people have been bragging and strutting for years about their destructive programs of apostasy. Patterson has let others come out as Church Growth leaders, while he remains one of most influential.