Sunday, February 5, 2012

A Simple Summary about UOJ and Justification by Faith - From A Stranger



Comment Link: http://steadfastlutherans.org/?p=4190&cpage=3#comment-282261
Author: John Standley
Comment:
I'm not saying they are like the Papists who reprimanded Luther. I'm saying that they are all open to interpretation according to the Scriptures and the Confessions. Both parties can be promoted as the "mascot" of the UOJ or anti-UOJ position. It's up to the Confessions to see who is interpreting Scripture correctly.

I'm going to have to agree with those who say that because Justification was the most argued point between the Papists and Protestants that obviously Objective Justification would have been covered exhaustively in a separate article. But it wasn't! I think that is profound! To say that one passage of Scripture or the Confessions is grounds for an Objective Justification that imputes righteousness to everyone prior to faith is crazy. The Papists have done the same thing with the book of James who completely interpret it out of the context of the whole of Scripture. To support their claims from James about works righteousness they throw "Synod essayists" at people and say that because of what they say it is true...because those in "power" say it is.

I don't agree with anyone who forms a doctrine from ONE passage among a sea of other contextual passages about justification by faith alone.

To be clear: I agree with those who say that OJ means justification has been won. SJ means that the justification that has been won has been imputed through faith.

I disagree with those who say that OJ is justification imputed to the whole unbelieving world apart from faith (when Christ died and/or was raised). And also that SJ is simply accepting this already declared imputed righteousness.

The brief statement says this: “Scripture teaches that God has already declared the whole world to be righteous in Christ.”

To me, that interpretation of OJ is what I defined as justification being imputed to each and every person on earth prior to faith which therefore negates the need for SJ because it has already been imputed objectively.
Permalink: http://steadfastlutherans.org/?p=4190

***

GJ - I do not know who this man is. I have no contact with him. I wanted to quote his statement from Steadfast Enthuisasts to show that people can discern the difference between crypto-Universalism and justification-by-faith.

Meanwhile, Brett Meyer and Dr. Lito Cruz are also making hash out of all the UOJ arguments. I think over 450 comments have been made so far.

The UOJ-widows may wish that their husbands were football fans instead.




Interfaith community is his legacy | Tulsa World

The Rev. Clarence Knippa, 98, takes a ride on his power wheelchair last week at Montreau, a retirement community. MICHAEL WYKE/Tulsa World

Interfaith community is his legacy | Tulsa World:


The Missouri Synod Lutheran Church did not endorse Knippa’s interfaith work, but they did not trouble him about it.

And he never felt that he compromised his Christian faith by working with other faith leaders, he said.

Read more from this Tulsa World article at
http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=18&articleid=20120128_18_A17_TheRev570964


'via Blog this'

Concordia Seminary basketball is a throwback



Concordia Seminary basketball is a throwback:


CLAYTON • It was about time for the tip-off at Concordia Seminary's Pederson Fieldhouse, but before the Preachers could start their game against visiting Williams Baptist College, there was the matter of the national anthem.

A crowd of some 25 people rose from their seats to hear the anthem — sung by the Concordia players.
That's standard practice at Pederson Fieldhouse. This clearly was no ordinary college basketball game. It was more, or less depending on your point of view.

There was no admission charge, no bleachers, no concession stand and no game programs. The fieldhouse on the Concordia campus in Clayton is named for the Preachers' longtime coach, the late Eldon "Pete" Pederson. I didn't know Pederson, but I remember him as an imposing figure when I attended Preachers games as a youngster in the late 1950s and early '60s. It was during that era when I was a neighborhood gym rat and got to serve as a ballboy for the St. Louis Hawks during their preseason camp at Concordia.


Read more: http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/faith-and-values/concordia-seminary-basketball-is-a-throwback/article_dedeb2df-99f0-5f35-9cc7-51623e275c33.html#ixzz1lZH3FgSM


'via Blog this'

But He Was Born Forgiven, According to Eduard Preuss, Jack Kilcrease's Favorite Theologian



bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Nineveh the Great Has Fallen!":

NFL supporting pedophile via song royalties, even during SuperBowl 2012:

Super-Bowl Sized blunder by NFL:

http://m.washingtonexaminer.com/2090472/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2093888/Paedophile-Gary-Glitter-pocket-thousands-pounds-royalties-hit-used-Superbowl-final.html?ITO=1490 

***

GJ - WELS is looking for a new Director of Communications.

Nineveh the Great Has Fallen!


From SP Mark Schroeder, WELS:

I apologize that the earlier copy of En Christo contained two errors. Please note that two pastors from each district attended the symposium, not three. Also note that an important word was omitted in the paragraph that begins "In addition to the fact that the TEC has . . ." The word "not" was omitted: the sentence should read, ". . . a number of other factors indicate that it may not be wise to make a final decision this summer." The corrections are included in the version below.

Fellow servants,

As you know, for more than a year we have been involved in discussions about the selection of a translation to be used in WELS publications. For a church body like ours, firmly committed to the truth of the inspired and inerrant Scriptures and to the Reformation principle of sola scriptura, few discussions could be more important. I know this is one more e-mail in your already full in-box, but I believe it's important for all of our called workers to be well informed of the facts of this process and what will be happening in the coming months.

As part of the ongoing effort to foster brotherly discussion and to clarify the issues involved in a translation choice, the Translation Evaluation Committee (TEC) organized a symposium held in early January. The symposium was attended by two pastors from each district (appointed by their respective district presidents) and the members of both the TEC and the Translation Feasibility Committee (TFC). Its purpose was not to promote one translation or to achieve consensus on a particular translation. Rather, it was intended to provide a forum to hear and discuss all sides of the translation issue and to work toward consensus on the translation principles that will guide our decision.

According to those who attended the symposium, it was a fruitful and beneficial gathering. Unfortunately, a summary of the symposium was circulated rather widely that unintentionally conveyed some inaccurate information. President Paul Wendland asked me to relay this message to you:

"There seem to be some misunderstandings circulating regarding the nature, the purpose, and the outcome of the TEC committee's recent symposium on translation. Out of a sense of love and fairness to all who were there, I offer the following as an attempt to clarify matters.

We (the TEC) felt that the symposium had served a good purpose. All of us came away with a deeper understanding of the complex choices that need to be made in translating God's Word into English. All of us were given ample opportunity to speak about our translational preferences and concerns, especially as those concerns applied to the NIV 2011. United in the belief that the Bible is God's inspired word and in our conviction that Christ is the center of the Scripture, we were able to discuss our preferences in a frank, and yet in a very fair and brotherly way. To that end, the symposium achieved its purposes. It was never envisioned that the symposium as such would draw any conclusions or make any recommendations to the synod or to the districts about a preferred translation. As a matter of fact, we did not do so."

Contrary to the impression the circulated summary gave, no "vote" was taken at the symposium regarding a preferred translation. In fact, there was a wide range of opinion expressed about the NIV 2011; both favorable opinions as well as various concerns were expressed. In keeping with the purpose of the symposium, the participants focused their attention on translation principles and the process of translation, agreed that more discussion and study is needed, and specifically determined not to take such a vote or as a group to express a preference for any particular translation.

So where are we now? What will happen in the coming months?

After the symposium, the TEC has come to the informal conclusion that continued discussion and further study is needed before any final decision can be made. Again, President Wendland has said,

"Is it wise for us given the time constraints we've all been working under to make a final decision this summer? For one thing, have we really—either as a synod, as districts, or even as an evaluation committee—had sufficient time to make a comparative evaluation of the various versions? Since July 2011, the TEC has been active, attending conventions and gatherings in all twelve districts, writing articles and reports and e-mails. We have done our best to do as the convention asked, namely 'to educate the synod on the general principles that we ought to use to evaluate the Bible translations mentioned in its reports, and so to help build a consensus among us on which translation to use for synod publications.' But the committee is still left with the question, 'Can a delegate really say that he has been provided with enough information to compare the merits and demerits of the NIV 2011, for example, with the merits and demerits of the Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB) so that he can vote accordingly?' "

In addition to the fact that the TEC has not had the time to study alternatives to the NIV 2011 as completely as it would like, a number of other factors indicate that it may not be wise to make a final decision this summer. When the convention determined that a decision should be made at the districts, the information available indicated that the NIV 1984 would not be able to be used in WELS publications after 2013. This has turned out not to be accurate. The "fair use" principle in copyright and publishing law indicates that Northwestern Publishing House would be able to continue using the NIV 1984 in its publications, provided that the quotations do not comprise more than 20% of the published material. In other words, NPH will be able to use the NIV 1984 in nearly all of its publications, including Meditations and Forward in Christ. Furthermore, NPH has said that it does not want its publication needs in any way to drive a final decision on translations and will find alternate solutions if necessary. For example, in the Christ-Light materials, NPH is considering a "translation neutral" approach, printing only Bible references and not the passages themselves.

All of this—the continuing concerns about NIV 2011 as well as the new information regarding the use of NIV 1984—means that the option to delay a decision may be one of the choices put before the district conventions this summer. The Conference of Presidents will be discussing this in upcoming meetings. If the COP adopts a recommendation to delay a decision, that recommendation will be forwarded to the districts for consideration.

What about the possibility of producing a new or revised translation by Lutherans? This matter is still under discussion by the TFC. If a decision is delayed by the districts this summer, additional time would be available to explore this option further. It is my personal opinion that this possibility should be pursued vigorously. While I recognize the obstacles and challenges (and many of those have been clearly voiced), it's an idea that should not be dismissed until we have carefully looked at all the factors involved. A translation (either a new one or a revision) by Lutherans would be a tremendous gift to the church. Admittedly, this option would not solve our more immediate problem with translations, but it could be a long term solution that proves to be a blessing for decades to come.

Some are concerned that this entire translation issue is an unfortunate cause of division among us. But in many ways, this entire discussion can be a blessing to us. We are not divided on doctrinal issues or the nature of Scripture itself. In all of our discussions—even those with some passion and heat—it is evident that we are completely united in our commitment to the inerrancy and inspiration of the Scriptures. It is clear that we have a fervent desire to communicate God's truth as clearly and as accurately as we can. Even among brothers there will be differences in how this can best be done. But we stand together, as Luther did, on Scripture alone. It's my prayer that our commitment to his Word will be deepened and strengthened by this process, difficult as it may sometimes be. After all, it is that Word that unites us in a common faith, committed to work together with one voice to preach the crucified and risen Christ.

Serving with you in Christ,

President Mark Schroeder

***

GJ - Scrape away all the PR and self-congratulations; the core message is - "Nineveh is dead."

On the other hand, the Left is good at push-back and the Right is good at premature celebration. Look at the Komen/Planned Parenthood fiasco. Komen abandoned Planned Parenthood for about 24 hours but fell on the murderous necks of the Margaret Sanger disciples, weeping that the price of their reconciliation not be too high. Komen is loud and proud for abortion again. It's about women's rights. It's about justice. It's about freedom.

That could happen with Nineveh, too.

The Love Shack Fire Department,
putting out fires all over the nation.
Guys. Guys! Look behind you!



Septuagesima Sunday, 2012:
The Unfair Wages Parable.
Matthew 20:1ff




Septuagesima Sunday, 2012

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn #479   Zion Rise                            2:13
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn # 151            Christ the Life                       2:78

Jesus Illustrates God’s Grace

The Hymn # 227     Come Holy Ghost                             2:72
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #409   Let Us Ever Walk                              2:91

1 Corinthians 9:24 Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize? So run, that ye may obtain.  25 And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible.  26 I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air:  27 But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway. 10:1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;  2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; 3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat;  4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.  5 But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.

KJV Matthew 20:1 For the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which went out early in the morning to hire labourers into his vineyard. 2 And when he had agreed with the labourers for a penny a day, he sent them into his vineyard. 

3 And he went out about the third hour, and saw others standing idle in the marketplace, 4 And said unto them; Go ye also into the vineyard, and whatsoever is right I will give you. And they went their way. 5 Again he went out about the sixth and ninth hour, and did likewise. 6 And about the eleventh hour he went out, and found others standing idle, and saith unto them, Why stand ye here all the day idle? 7 They say unto him, Because no man hath hired us. He saith unto them, Go ye also into the vineyard; and whatsoever is right, that shall ye receive. 

8 So when even was come, the lord of the vineyard saith unto his steward, Call the labourers, and give them their hire, beginning from the last unto the first. 9 And when they came that were hired about the eleventh hour, they received every man a penny. 10 But when the first came, they supposed that they should have received more; and they likewise received every man a penny. 11 And when they had received it, they murmured against the goodman of the house, 12 Saying, These last have wrought but one hour, and thou hast made them equal unto us, which have borne the burden and heat of the day. 

13 But he answered one of them, and said, Friend, I do thee no wrong: didst not thou agree with me for a penny? 14 Take that thine is, and go thy way: I will give unto this last, even as unto thee. 15 Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? Is thine eye evil, because I am good? 

16 So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.

Septuagesima Sunday

Lord God, heavenly Father, who through Thy holy word hast called us into Thy vineyard: Send, we beseech Thee, Thy Holy Spirit into our hearts, that we may labor faithfully in Thy vineyard, shun sin and all offense, obediently keep Thy word and do Thy will, and put our whole and only trust in Thy grace, which Thou hast bestowed upon us so plenteously through Thy Son Jesus Christ, that we may obtain eternal salvation through Him, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

Jesus Illustrates God’s Grace


KJV Matthew 20:1 For the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which went out early in the morning to hire labourers into his vineyard. 2 And when he had agreed with the labourers for a penny a day, he sent them into his vineyard.

One person asked recently, “How do we know whether the verse is to be taken literally or figuratively?” My answer was, “Context.”

Here is the context – “For the kingdom of heaven is like unto” – that is the language of a parable. We know that from the larger context of all the parables Jesus taught. Many times the words “like unto” are used. At other times they are called parables. They are also called figures.

Clearly they were intended for the catechism of believers, not for anyone who happened to be in the crowd. Jesus said so explicitly. Also we can see the effect when he spoke a parable, and the religious opponents realized it was spoken against them.

In other words, the Savior revealed as much as He chose to reveal. If a non-believer makes fun of a parable and mocks it in some way, that is the idea. He sees without seeing and hears without perceiving. Although the Word has this blinding effect, it also irritates and disturbs so that unbelievers cannot get it out of their minds. In trying to dispose of it they often grasp the Word so strongly that the Word converts them.

That is the mystery of election. God works through the Word, so we are not to investigate those things that belong only to Him. However, we are supposed to share this Word generously since God’s divine energy is bound up in it and He lets us see the results of it.

So one part of context is the parable. This is a short story, fictional, to teach one or more points. Since it is so brief, every detail is important.

The larger context is also important. The Bible never contradicts itself, so no one can assert one point that is against another position in the Bible. On the positive side, we say, “Scripture interprets Scripture.”

False teachers do the opposite of studying a passage in its immediate and larger context. They pixelate Scripture. Pixelation is a modern term for enlarging a graphic so much that we only see some pixels, which do not give us any concept of the picture.

In Photoshop I pixelate graphics so I can edit them, pixel by pixel. I can see the dark edges I want to remove but I cannot even tell how that looks until I use the full screen view again, to see my editing work in context.

So every false teacher will pixelate Bible verses. They often play with words and distort them too. Symbolic language is their little sandbox to play in. I have to know all of John’s Gospel to deal with someone who says the entire world was forgiven, because John said, “Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” The verse by itself does not teach world absolution at all, but pixilation plus some authorities quoted will make it seem that way.

World absolution collides with

KJV John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

Some will say, but I have several more verses that prove world absolution. But each verse has to pass the test of John 3:36 and many other passages. Besides that, it is not a question of one verse against another. The verses were added later for convenience. The question is, “What does the entire Scripture teach?”

Roman Catholics use pixilation and authorities. I could go to my favorite Vatican owned seminary (the only one in America) and use their library in Columbus. I had sign out privileges. They had an entire wall of books about Mary, one recent set being 3 volumes long. I could use those to say, “This verse in the Bible teaches that about Mary, because I have 100 theologians who agree with me.” Of course, the effect of those Mariology books was just the opposite on me, but I could see the power of deception, having all those highly trained academics on one side of the issue.

The Hiring
We can see that we have a parable with an obvious agricultural parallel. Anyone who owns a farm or vineyard is going to hire people to help with the labor-intensive workers. The framework of the parable is hiring laborers at a penny day for their work.

3 And he went out about the third hour, and saw others standing idle in the marketplace, 4 And said unto them; Go ye also into the vineyard, and whatsoever is right I will give you. And they went their way.

More laborers are needed, so they are hired. But there is no pay established. That was only for the first hired – a penny a day.

5 Again he went out about the sixth and ninth hour, and did likewise. 6 And about the eleventh hour he went out, and found others standing idle, and saith unto them, Why stand ye here all the day idle? 7 They say unto him, Because no man hath hired us. He saith unto them, Go ye also into the vineyard; and whatsoever is right, that shall ye receive.

Three more sets of laborers are hired. This is the way they hired in Phoenix. The day laborers, as they were called, stationed themselves near the big hardware stores or another hiring place. People came by, made a deal, and took men home for a day’s work.

Payday

8 So when even was come, the lord of the vineyard saith unto his steward, Call the labourers, and give them their hire, beginning from the last unto the first.

Now the plot develops. The Lord of the Vineyard is clearly God, and the Promise will be fulfilled, beginning with the last contacted.

Minimum Wage Dispute

9 And when they came that were hired about the eleventh hour, they received every man a penny. 10 But when the first came, they supposed that they should have received more; and they likewise received every man a penny.

Those hired later assumed that the very latest getting one penny meant they would get more than that.

Arguing the Law

11 And when they had received it, they murmured against the goodman of the house, 12 Saying, These last have wrought but one hour, and thou hast made them equal unto us, which have borne the burden and heat of the day.

Now we see that the parable is answering the question of Peter, just before this parable began. The workers are those believers who have labored in the Church (an image from Old Testament times for the Kingdom of God) and see people getting the same reward for working one hour.

This response is logical but also sinful. We used to say in Phoenix, “You will never mow the law at noon after you try it the first time.” Likewise, in this parable the workers are talking about the burning of the sun and the drying winds. It is exhausting to work under such conditions. So they argue, “We worked the hardest time of the day but you give them the same pay.”

13 But he answered one of them, and said, Friend, I do thee no wrong: didst not thou agree with me for a penny? 14 Take that thine is, and go thy way: I will give unto this last, even as unto thee. 15 Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? Is thine eye evil, because I am good?

The parable begins with a specific promise for the first workers and another promise to the rest.
This is a good example of man looking at God’s management from a human point of view. If those who work so little in comparison get 1 penny, they get far more.

But this is a matter of grace (Promises of God) rather than Law. The main point is leading up to another matter, which is far more serious. The first part shows what grace means, that God showers grace according to His will, not according to man’s measure.

The ending is a solemn warning, often not heeded.

16 So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.

Many Christian leaders prosper and win admiration for many different reasons. That goes to their heads and they think they can handle the Gospel so well that they can flaunt the Ten Commandments. So they do. They risk lives on the highway (DUIs). They destroy their own families and others with infidelity – first to the Word, then to their wives and children. They decide all the money is theirs, since they have worked so hard, so they live like royalty and steal like thieves. The longer they get away with it, the greater their daring. But when natural law catches up, they are drop-kicked into the abyss.

In contrast, many who think they are nothing are really the greatest in the Kingdom because of their child-like faith and the way that bears fruit over time. They do not think they matter at all, but God knows who they are and how they are fruitful for the Kingdom.

As Luther says, this verse warns the great against arrogance and encourages the downtrodden not to despair. Many are called but few are elect. The Gospel invitation goes out to the entire world, but that saving faith is lost through many temptations, the Old Adam, the assaults of the unbelieving world, and Satan’s work.

In the context of the preceding passage, we can see how the parable illustrates what Jesus taught.

KJV Matthew 19:24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. 25 When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, Who then can be saved? 26 But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible. 27 Then answered Peter and said unto him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore? 28 And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. 29 And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life. 30 But many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first.

Sound Doctrine


"Since now, in the sight of God and of all Christendom [the entire Church of Christ], we wish to testify to those now living and those who shall come after us that this declaration herewith presented concerning all the controverted articles aforementioned and explained, and no other, is our faith, doctrine, and confession, in which we are also willing, by God's grace, to appear with intrepid hearts before the judgment-seat of Jesus Christ, and give an account of it; and that we will neither privately nor publicly speak or write anything contrary to it, but, by the help of God's grace, intend to abide thereby: therefore, after mature deliberation, we have, in God's fear and with the invocation of His name, attached our signatures with our own hands."
            Thorough Declaration, Of Other Factions and Sects, Formula of Concord, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 1103.

"'If there ever was a strictly conservative body, it surely is the Missouri Synod. Nevertheless, this growth!...It is a mark of the pastors and leaders of the Missouri Synod that they never, aye, never, tire of discussing doctrine on the basis of Scripture and the Confessions. That is one trait that may be called the spirit of Missouri. People who thus cling to doctrine and contend for its purity are of an entirely different nature from the superficial unionists who in the critical moment will declare five to be an even number. God will bless all who value His Word so highly.'"
            (Dr. Lenski, Kirchenzeitung, May 20, 1922)
            cited in W. A. Baepler, "Doctrine, True and False," The Abiding Word, ed., Theodore Laetsch, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1946, II, p. 515f.

"We should not consider the slightest error against the Word of God unimportant."
            What Luther Says , An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 637.

"Error and heresy must come into the world so that the elect may become approved and manifest. Their coming is in the best interests of Christians if they take the proper attitude toward it. St. Augustine, who certainly was sufficiently annoyed by wretched sectaries, says that when heresy and offense come, they produce much benefit in Christendom; for they cause Christians industriously to read Holy Scriptures and with diligence to pursue it and persevere in its study. Otherwise they might let it lie on the shelf, become very secure, and say: Why, God's Word and the text of Scripture are current and in our midst; it is not necessary for us to read Holy Scripture."
            What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 639.

“You cannot of a truth be for true doctrine without being unalterably opposed to false doctrine. There can be no 'positive theology' where the God-given negatives have been eliminated from the Decalog."
            Norman A. Madson, Preaching to Preachers, Mankato: Lutheran Synod Book Company, 1952. Preface.