Sunday, April 3, 2011

Tanks for the Memories, Bishop Hanson


For the record: 743 congregations take first votes to leave the ELCA (Click on this, Mequonites. It is called a link.)

As of March 3, the ELCA Office of the Secretary reported that 743 congregations have taken a total of 791 first votes to leave the ELCA.

Of those 791 first votes, 551 passed and 240 failed. It said 437 second votes have been taken, a requirement to cut ties with the denomination.

Of those, 414 second votes passed and 23 failed. Most of the votes came in reaction to the 2009 Churchwide Assembly's actions on sexuality.
***

GJ - ELCA's only doctrine is UOJ - everyone is forgiven, except those who left ELCA.

Just a Coincidence!



raklatt (http://raklatt.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Edward Fredrich's 1979 Essay on Gausewitz:Or - Ana...":

So it took but a short five years after Gausewitz' death for Missouri to establish its Brief Statement, introducing UOJ formally, no longer under the watchful eye of the President of the Synodical Conference.

Coincidence?

***

GJ - Good point, Mr. Klatt. I am just starting to realize how significant Gausewitz was - as a WELS leader and Synodical Conference leader. I wonder if Gausewitz suppressed UOJ while he was around.

Gausewitz was already a forgotten man when I joined WELS. John Seifert bragged up the Kuske Talmudic Catechism. I remember reading the Fredrich essay when I was at Mequon. Two things increased my interest in Gausewitz. One was the initial analysis sent to me by someone in WELS. The second was a WELS layman saying he was confirmed in WELS with the Gausewitz catechism by one of the older pastors at that time.

The 1932 Brief Statement was a F. Pieper project, and the other brief statements did not mention UOJ.

Of course, Luther's Small Catechism has no UOJ in it - no hint of it. To overturn justification by faith and install Fuller doctrine was a monumental achievement. More needs to be known about this.

Remember, readers, that the architect of Seminex and board member of Seminex was Jungkuntz, who was hotter than Georgia asphalt for UOJ.
Jungkuntz, unmasked at Northwestern College, upgraded to Concordia Seminary, Springfield; 
promoted to the doctrinal board, LCMS; promoted to ELCA college provost.
He was a Seminex leader and board member of the rebel Seminex school.

For Good Schadenfreude, Joel Lillo,
First Make Sure of the Schaden



Joel has left a new comment on your post "Forward in Reverse - Making Each New Version Worse...":

The first catechism used by the Synod was the Dresden Catechism--in German, of course. This was followed by the Gausewitz catechism of 1917, written by Pastor Carl Gausewitz, who was the pastor of Grace Lutheran Church of Milwaukee from 1956 to 1927.

Quite an accomplishment, considering that he passed away in 1927. So let me get this straight, he went into the future and then served as a pastor backwards through time. That certainly gives Einsteinian physicists something to think about.

***

GJ - The article was copied verbatim from the infallible WELS server, from an article in FICL (nee The Northwestern Lutheran).

As anyone can see, the title in the body of the post is linked to the source.

How sad, that a graduate of The Sausage Factory--a pastor in Fox Valley WELS--would fail to see the significance of Gausewitz teaching justification by faith while the next guy (David Kuske) embedded UOJ in the innocent minds of WELS catechumens.

As Ichabodians suspect, I was waiting for someone to jump on me like a hobo on a hotdog - for the WELS mistake in dates.

This happened before, when I posted a verbatim article about Jeske preaching or participating at a Missouri Synod installation service. Someone attacked me for making up information because the same information was not in a different news release. I had the news release that I used linked in the post. Did that accuser go to me for a possible correction? No, he accused me me to another person, and that person forwarded the false accusation to me.

Lillo has a sense of humor and he is really quite pleasant, so I am not equating him with that person at all. Someone should do some editing at FICL or their server.

Those who never studied German (most Mequon grads) would like to know the definition of the term above. Schadenfreude is the joy felt from the shame of others. Schaden is the shame part and Freude is the joy part.

Schadenfreude is a good description of WELS, with its gay college video, pointing a finger at ELCA for promoting homosexuality.

Laetare - The Fourth Sunday in Lent

By Norma Boeckler




Laetare Sunday, The Fourth Sunday in Lent, 2011

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn # 151 Christ the Life 2:78
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual
The Gospel
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #429 Lord Thee I Love 2:54

Children of Freedom, of the Gospel

The Communion Hymn #508 Thou Whose 2:72
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 45 Now the Hour 2:95

KJV Galatians 4:21 Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law? 22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. 24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. 25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. 26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all. 27 For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband. 28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. 29 But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now. 30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman. 31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.

KJV John 6:1 After these things Jesus went over the sea of Galilee, which is the sea of Tiberias. 2 And a great multitude followed him, because they saw his miracles which he did on them that were diseased. 3 And Jesus went up into a mountain, and there he sat with his disciples. 4 And the passover, a feast of the Jews, was nigh. 5 When Jesus then lifted up his eyes, and saw a great company come unto him, he saith unto Philip, Whence shall we buy bread, that these may eat? 6 And this he said to prove him: for he himself knew what he would do. 7 Philip answered him, Two hundred pennyworth of bread is not sufficient for them, that every one of them may take a little. 8 One of his disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter's brother, saith unto him, 9 There is a lad here, which hath five barley loaves, and two small fishes: but what are they among so many? 10 And Jesus said, Make the men sit down. Now there was much grass in the place. So the men sat down, in number about five thousand. 11 And Jesus took the loaves; and when he had given thanks, he distributed to the disciples, and the disciples to them that were set down; and likewise of the fishes as much as they would. 12 When they were filled, he said unto his disciples, Gather up the fragments that remain, that nothing be lost. 13 Therefore they gathered them together, and filled twelve baskets with the fragments of the five barley loaves, which remained over and above unto them that had eaten. 14 Then those men, when they had seen the miracle that Jesus did, said, This is of a truth that prophet that should come into the world. 15 When Jesus therefore perceived that they would come and take him by force, to make him a king, he departed again into a mountain himself alone.

Fourth Sunday In Lent
Lord God, heavenly Father, who by Thy Son didst feed five thousand men in the desert with five loaves and two fishes: We beseech Thee to abide graciously also with us in the fullness of Thy blessing. Preserve us from avarice and the cares of this life, that we may seek first Thy kingdom and Thy righteousness, and in all things perceive Thy fatherly goodness, through Jesus Christ, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God world without end. Amen.

Children of Freedom, of the Gospel

Lenski:
It has been well said that, although he is at a loss because he is so far away from the Galatians, the fertile mind of Paul, in his attempt to separate them from all legalism, finds another effective mode of approach. From personal appeal he turns to a clear case that is recorded in Scripture, which is illustrative of both bondage and freedom, the account of Hagar and Ishmael and of Sarah and Isaac. To the subjective and personal Paul thus adds the Scriptural and objective.
The use of this Scriptural account has been termed a rabbinical argumentation by which Paul seeks to turn the arguments of the rabbinical Judaizers against themselves. But this is not an argumentum ad hominem, not a turning of the Judaizers’ guns against themselves. The argument is not merely negative, it is powerfully positive. Nor does Paul convert the history into an allegory. He uses the history, for only as historical fact has it the power of conviction that Paul needs. But this Paul does: he brings out God’s own thoughts that are embedded in this history as they teach and instruct us Christians for all time. This is far beyond the old or the new rabbis. It is divine reality. How the Old Testament histories ought to be read, not superficially for their mere externals, but for their real content, Paul shows us in many places, notably in Rom. 4 (Abraham), Rom. 5:12, etc. (Adam and the patriarchs before Moses), also Gal. 3:16 (Abraham having the covenant hundreds of years before Moses and the law came into existence).
The substance as well as the absence of a connective indicate the beginning of a new section. Tell me, you who want to be under the law, do you not hear the Law?
The question at the head of this exposition is arresting. The Galatians and certainly those who were becoming enamored of law as a means of salvation had heard the Law. But that is exactly to what Paul refers: hearing the Law and yet wanting to be under law. “Tell me,” Paul says, “how this can possibly be.” Whatever one may say about the old Jews (2 Cor. 3:14, 15), the Galatians had at least learned to read the Torah without such a darkening, blinding veil. Distinguish between “under law” without an article and “the Law” with the article, here in the sense of the Torah, the Pentateuch, “Moses” (2 Cor. 3:15; John 5:46). “Under law” is under law in general, a state which these Galatians were trying to achieve by getting to be under the Mosaic ceremonial system. One gets under law by means of some legal system or other.
The fact that “the Law” refers to the Pentateuch we see from what follows, namely the story of Hagar who lived long before the ceremonial law was given (3:17). Paul is citing one of the histories of the Pentateuch. The Books of Moses were constantly read in the synagogues; they were divided into paraschas or regular lections, the other Old Testament books were likewise divided into sections, their lections being called haphtharas. The early Christian congregations continued this practice of reading the Old Testament until the New Testament canon was gradually formed when lections were selected from these New Testament writings. We see no reason for excluding reference to these readings in the Christian assemblies, nor for intensifying “do you not hear” as meaning, “do you not understand?”
Lenski, R. C. H.: The Interpretation of St. Paul's Epistles to the Galatians, to the Ephesians and to the Philippians. Columbus, O. : Lutheran Book Concern, 1937, S. 232.

This is one of the great passages about Law and Gospel. The non-Lutheran Protestants do not pay attention to Law and Gospel, and they tend to fall into the diagnosis of Law (correct) and the prescription of more Law to fix the problem (not correct).

The difference between Law and Gospel is the same as X-ray versus medicine. An X-ray only identifies the problem. The X-ray does not heal anything. They tried. In the old days of medicine, X-rays were promoted as healing. That maimed a number of people and probably led to many cases of cancer. Likewise, fascination with radium led people to drink “perpetual sunshine” or radium water, with disastrous results.

Paul’s brief letter to the Galatians is a frontal attack on salvation by the Law. The great divisions of the Scripture relate to each other:
Law and Gospel
Faith and Unbelief
Works and Grace
Sin and Forgiveness
The Kingdom of God versus the Kingdom of Satan

Every religion has law in it, and that law is always a reflection of the origin Law of God revealed in the Old Testament. Pagan religions add their own laws, and these laws are often at war with the Word of God.

This was the great challenge of Paul’s ministry. He was not teaching against the Law of God itself, but the misuse of the Law, salvation by the Law, with man-made traditions added as well.

We are vulnerable to Law motivation and Law salvation because our natural state is oriented toward the Law. People are easily led into salvation by the Law and they get angry if that is questioned.

Salvation by the Law is never comforting in the long run, so people increase the Law requirements with the thought that they have fulfilled them.

Thus the era of Pietism focused on works and the Law rather than God’s grace and the Gospel. Out of that era came a Holiness Code, which made certain outward acts forbidden of all Christians. Of course, this code varied. It included tobacco and alcohol, but the German Pietists never included alcohol as a sin. Gambling was naturally bad, so even Old Maid was a sin, because playing Old Maid could lead to gambling. (I don’t see any Old Maid websites, enticing people!)

Some denominations were overwhelming Pietistic. Baptists and Methodists were very much against drinking any alcoholic beverages, including wine in Holy Communion (which they denied anyway and neglected even in its altered state).

We live in a Baptist county now, and the Christian faith is very important to the typical resident here. One example of Pietistic legalism is rather obvious. Every restaurant is considered a private club, because this is a semi-dry county. No one can buy alcohol in a store, but every restaurant (private club) has a bar. The bars are quite prominent. Customers must sign a book as club members every time they eat, even if they do not drink. The government sends people around to make sure the customers sign the book. The employees insist because they will be in trouble if snitches are there who do not get asked to sign the book. So I sign in as William and Katy, Clark Kent and Lois Lane, Sam and Ella, etc.

Most importantly, this does nothing to stop alcoholism. It drives people across the state line to buy it, and it puts drinking in front of everyone as they enter most restaurants.

Jesus came to give us the Gospel and to plant faith in our hearts. That faith is faith in Him, in His power to forgive and His compassion to absolve our sins.

Notice that when Jesus rebuked His disciples, He did not say, “O ye card-players” or “O ye drinkers.” He berated them for their lack of faith. “O ye of little faith.”

Lack of faith in Him is the beginning of all sin. So it is tragic that Lutherans have spent the last 30 to 50 years making faith bad.

I often discuss this with laity who are perplexed that this happened. It was cleverly done in the name of grace.

When a class was asked about salvation, one person answered, “We are saved by faith.” A pastor responded, “By grace!” One does not replace the other. That is like correcting a person about baptism by saying “Communion!” How is one forgiven of all his sins?
“Baptism!”
“No, communion!”

Grace describes God’s attitude toward us. Instead of demanding that we pay for our sins, He has His beloved Son pay the price for us. Knowing we are still sinners, as long as we live, He forgives us because of Christ.

We receive this forgiveness through faith. “O ye of little faith” is a rebuke against our weak and faltering faith. The Gospel promises of forgiveness, the declaration of God’s grace, the examples of God’s work – all move us to trust His Word.

Luther called this the “unfree will.” The Holy Spirit works upon us to convert us to faith in the Savior. We can exercise our will in rejecting the Word and following false teachers. People do that all the time. But faith is a creation of the Word. We are New Creations through the Word of the Gospel.

Therefore it is a great shame that a generation or two of Lutheran pastors have taught against faith in Christ. The longer they prattle about forgiveness without faith, the more extreme they get. They are blinded by their own false doctrine, like those drug-addled celebrities who think their jabbering is profound wisdom. For example, how can anyone say babies are born justified, before baptism? Yet Eduard Preuss was quoted saying that, as if that settled matters.

Using Martin Luther as an example – he talked about praying to Mary in his early years. That never settled it for Lutherans or for me. He grew away from the Marian piety he was taught in the priesthood.

But why do people cling to unfaith? They are taught unfaith and loyalty to people, rather than the Word, instead of the Word.

Throw away all the books in the world, and the Bible is still clear. We are declared forgiven by faith, not by works.

Those who follow false doctrine are be-deviled by the results of their bewitched state. They say they are all Gospel, since everyone is forgiven in advance and saved too! – but listen to their words – they are all condemnation and Law. Tim Glende’s infamous blog is a good example of unwarranted and unsubstantiated accusations, holier than thou while posing with Katy Perry and proud of it.

They imagine forgiveness without faith is all Gospel, but their words betray them. They brag about their works and demand works. Everyone has to do more and pay more. In the name of grace and salvation, they enslave people and abuse people, just as much as the famous abusive sects. They are no different because they have the same Lord and Master, the Prince of this World, Satan, their Father Below.

Our Gospel Comfort
We know through the Scriptures that God has provided many aids for us in our weakness. His grace-filled forgiveness comes to us through the Means of Grace. Do you doubt? Here is the visible sign of His forgiveness – His body and blood. Do you question His presence? Every rainbow is a sign of God’s promise in ancient times, never to command a global flood again.

A forgiven person is a forgiving person. Where the Gospel abounds, the fruits of the Gospel also abound.

Quotations
"Christ is speaking here not of the word of the law, but of the Gospel, which is a discourse about Christ, who died for our sins, etc. For God did not wish to impart Christ to the world in any other way; he had to embody him in the Word and thus distributed him, and present him to everybody; otherwise Christ would have existed for himself alone and remained unknown to us; he would have thus died for himself. But since the Word places before us Christ, it thus places us before him who has triumphed over death, sin, and Satan. Therefore, he who grasps and retains Christ, has thus also eternal deliverance from death. Consequently it is a Word of life, and it is true, that whoever keeps the Word shall never see death."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 177. John 8:46﷓59.

"Scripture therefore uses these words, 'We are justified by faith,' to teach both: 1) What the reason (or merit) for justification is, or what the blessings of Christ are; to wit, that through and for the sake of Christ alone we are granted forgiveness of sins, righteousness and eternal life; and 2. How
these should be applied or transferred to us; namely, by embracing the promise and relying on Christ by faith alone."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith (1568), p. 107.

"What is the difference between Christianity and paganism? Paganism has no sure Word of God and no true faith in Christ. It is unsettled. In place of the one true God, pagans worship various factitious deities and countless idols with ceremonies, works and sacrifices selected according to human judgment. They imagine that they compensate for their sins with this worship, pacify their gods and make them gracious and purchase, as it were, blessings from them."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith, (1568), p. 19.

"What is the reason for certainty in Christian doctrine?...7. the hatred of the devil over against this doctrine;
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith, (1568), p. 21.

"Creation is the external action of God by which God, seeing all other things, visible and invisible, fashioned them out of nothing with this plan of His that He might establish for Himself an eternal Church to acknowledge and praise Him and in which He might dwell forever."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith, (1568), p. 45.

"The good angels are spiritual beings, created in the beginning after the image of God; that is, they are intelligent, truthful, just and free. They are not part of another species or the souls of people; and they are immortal, ordained by God to praise Him and to be servants of the Church and protectors of the devout, Hebrews 1, Psalm 34, Psalm 103, and Psalm 104."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith, (1568), p. 47. Hebrews 1; Psalm 34; Psalm 103; Psalm 104

"There are eight sins which militate against faith: 1. Epicurean and Academic doubts about God, His providence and the certainty of the doctrine handed down through Christ and the Apostles. 2. A lack of faith toward God. 3. In regard to the forgiveness of sins, to entertain doubts as to whether we arein the grace of God or if we please God. 4. Despair. 5. Stubbornness of presumption. 6. Confidence in human aids. 7. Superstition. 8. Witchcraft."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith, (1568), p. 65f.

"The sins which militate against the Third Commandment are the profanation of the Sabbath through neglect and contempt of the ministry, through Judaic and superstitious observance of the Sabbath, or through a shifting of the ministry into the kingdom of this world. The faithfulness of those who teach is the virtue by which the ministers of the Church, aware of their modest skill in Christian doctrine, carefully and zealousy discharge and steadfastly protect all the duties of the faithful dispenser of the mysteries of God in teaching, debating, comforting and setting their hearers an example of true devotion and of all the virtues. The other extreme are faithlessness, heedless teaching or negligence in office, or deserting the ministry because of excessive anxiety or concern over one's own weakness."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith, (1568), p. 71f.

Edward Fredrich's 1979 Essay on Gausewitz:
Or - Anatomy of a Fraud

Gausewitz was respected as a leader in the Wisconsin Synod. His catechism never mentioned UOJ (unlike Kuske's) and was used by almost all the members for decades.
WELS praised Gausewitz while swapping his catechism with Kuske's.
Too clever by half.
Here is Morton "Salty" Schroder for the final kick under the bus, 1982.


http://www.wlsessays.net/files/FredrichGausewitz.pdf

Carl Gausewitz: Church Man and Catechist
By Edward C. Fredrich
[This essay is part of a series of essays produced by a joint effort involving Dr. Martin Luther College and Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary for the 450th anniversary of Luther’s Large and Small Catechisms in the spring of 1979.]

It would be safe to assume even without statistical evidence that 90 percent of the members in our church body learned the rudiments of the Christian religion from the Gausewitz Catechism in either its original or revised form. Who was Gausewitz? Even without statistical evidence it would be safe to assume that 90 percent of these learners would not even know the rudiments of a Gausewitz biography. That situation should be rectified.

Already in 1927 the obituary writers were hinting at a reluctance of Gausewitz to have writings of his or about him appear in print.1 Add to this the built-in aversion of our church body to heroes and hero-worship and a definite difficulty has been created for any biographical endeavors. Nevertheless some biographical material is required in a Quarterly issue that concentrates on the anniversary of Luther’s Catechism. Who was Gausewitz?

Preparation
One would want Carl Gausewitz to have strong and long synodical roots. That is exactly the way it was. His father was a pioneer pastor of the Wisconsin Synod. Way back in 1860 President Muehlhaeuser reported to the synodical convention:

In the month of November [1859] there appeared Candidates Gausewitz and Strube, trained by the Barmen Mission Institute and sent out by the Langenberger Society. Brother Gausewitz went to Pastor Koehler and Brother Strube to Pastor Reim, where they were for a limited period to receive practical guidance to make them ready for service. Under the prevailing circumstances I
was compelled to authorize Pastor Koehler and Pastor Sprengling to ordain Brother Gausewitz
so that he could take over the field of the deposed Rueter in Maple Grove.2

In the following year, on August 29, Carl Gausewitz, Sr. and his wife Amalie nee Lobscheid became the parents of Carl, Jr. The birthplace was what is today’s Reedsville in the Manitowoc area. The father, who was in seniority the twenty-first member of the synodical body at the time of his admission, also served pastorates at West Bend and Iron Ridge while his son Carl was growing up. In 1868 the father would affix his name as one of the five Wisconsin signers to the historic Missouri-Wisconsin Agreement that paved the way to fellowship relations between the bodies.

In the fall of 1872, in his eleventh year, Carl Gausewitz entered the worker-training school at Watertown. He completed the Northwestern course in 1879. Among his teachers there were A. Ernst, A. Graebner, and F. Notz. At the Milwaukee seminary he studied under Professors A. Hoenecke and E. Notz. In 1882 he was sent out into the ministry. Two days before his twenty-first birthday he was ordained and installed at East Farmington, Polk County, Wisconsin, by Pastor Philip von Rohr and the retiring Pastor F. Seifert.3

Pastor
The pastorate at East Farmington would last only three years. The Zion congregation, now a member of the Minnesota District, was then young and small. It had its beginnings in the mid 1860s, was served from Lake Elmo two decades, and erected its first church building in 1874. Carl Gausewitz was the first resident pastor.

The three-year service at East Farmington demonstrated that the fledgling pastor had outstanding ability and abundant zeal. The communicant roll grew steadily until it stood at about 225 the year that Gausewitz accepted another call.4

The large St. John’s Church in St. Paul had a vacant pastorate in 1885 because Pastor Hoyer had been called as head of the synodical school being opened at New Ulm. St. John’s reached across the state and synodical boundary line to call as its new pastor Carl Gausewitz. He arrived just in time to become involved in an ambitious relocation project.

There had been a movement of the membership away from the original location in the lower city toward the east.5 Property was purchased at the corner of Hope and Margaret Streets in 1886. First a school was built, utilized also for evening services. By the end of 1891 a new church building seating 1500 had been erected at the site. Obviously there were debts.

Before they could be retired, the 1893 Panic struck. The old church property brought only one-fifth of the anticipated sum. An excerpt from the congregation’s sketch in the synodical golden anniversary history provides this summary:

In these difficult years the dear Father in heaven graciously preserved the congregation from despair. The Word of God demonstrated its power in the members and preserved them steadfast and immovable, even supplying courage for new undertakings. Although a considerable debt was still burdening the congregation, more property was acquired on Margaret Street and a roomy, attractive parsonage was erected at considerable cost in 1902. In 1903 provisions were made for the future through the purchase of three lots across from the church building on which a school was to be built. Through all this time the congregation was strengthened inwardly and outwardly in peace through the grace of God. In the summer of 1906 the Reverend Pastor C. Gausewitz accepted a call to Grace Church in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.6
In 1906 as well as a score years later Grace Church’s pulpit ranked as one of the most prestigious in the Wisconsin Synod. Muehlhaeuser had filled it from the founding to 1867. Jaekel, long-time synodical secretary and treasurer, served there from 1868–1906. The membership was large and still growing. An able and dedicated pastor was needed.

Carl Gausewitz had left the Wisconsin Synod in 1885 to serve the neighboring body. He returned two decades later recognized as one endowed with administrative and leadership talents. He had been entrusted with the presidencies of the Minnesota Synod and the Allgemeine Synode. The years 1906 to 1927 would be good for both pastor and congregation.

They were busy years for the pastor. Apart from large responsibilities to be described in subsequent pages, Carl Gausewitz served on the editorial committee of the Gemeinde-Blatt from the time that committee was formed in 1908 to assume work previously in the hands of the faculty of the Theological Seminary until thetime of his death. He was a member of the governing board for both Northwestern College and the Theological Seminary. For seventeen years he was chairman of the Lutheran city missions of Milwaukee.


President
Most people never get elected president. Gausewitz was president of three large church bodies: the Minnesota Synod, 1894–1906; the Allgemeine Synode, 1901–1907 and 1913–17; the Synodical Conference, 1912–1927.

After six years of service in the Minnesota District Gausewitz was elected vice-president. In 1894 he was chosen to succeed C.J. Albrecht as president. Bemoaning previous debts and deficits, the Minnesota historian points out that it wasn’t until the bleak panic years and the new regime that improvements were made.

Only in the year 1894, when Pastor C. Gausewitz was elected president, did the Synod find the right way to rid itself of its debt. It was resolved that the congregations should according to their ability share in the synodical debt and should themselves gather their offerings. Thus paid collectors were rendered superfluous and the Synod was spared a yearly expense of about $1000. Carrying out the resolution may have left much to be desired, but at least we could again breathe a sigh of relief and the threat of bankruptcy was averted. The debt was decreased year by year and with but a slight effort will soon be liquidated.7

The Gausewitz presidency in the Minnesota Synod is generally characterized by a businesslike attention to such details as budget, debt retirement, and joint work with fellow believers in other synods. There is a minimum of the spectacular that gets attention in the pages of church history. Most noteworthy activity perhaps was the development of the Belle Plaine Home. President Gausewitz, together with Pastors Moebus and Stiemke, served on the committees that saw the charitable endeavor develop from a legacy in 1897 to a dedicated building on Nov. 6, 1898.

After describing this effort, the Minnesota history continues: “Regarding the development of the Synod since the founding of the Allgemeine Synode [1892], there is little more of significance to report. There is a slow outward growth. There is faithful labor in the fields alotted with the powers God has given and the Lord is acknowledging the efforts.”8 The time described encompasses all the years of Gausewitz’ Minnesota presidency.

Before that presidency was completed Gausewitz was involved with another. In 1901 the Allgemeine Synode or General Synod of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, and other States elected him to be its president and reelected him in 1903 and 1905. As vice-president he had already functioned as president when Dr. Ernst resigned the office abruptly on Oct. 1, 1900.

Gausewitz does not seem to have been too happy serving in this post. After the first two-year term he declared in the presidential address: “According to the non-prescriptive opinion of the undersigned many a difficulty in our joint endeavors would be obviated if the presidency of the General Synod would again be entrusted to a member of the Wisconsin Synod.”9 At the next meeting he repeated the request and in 1907 it was the same story.10 In 1907 the convention yielded to the pleas of the man who had just begun his pastorate at Grace Church.

Having given Gausewitz a period of grace to adjust to the new post, the General Synod in 1913 once again entrusted him with the presidency and subsequently reelected him in 1915. These were busy and important years for the General Synod, the time when it was transforming itself from a loose federation of synods into the merged Joint Synod with districts. The administrative skills of Carl Gausewitz helped make smooth and easy a transition that could easily have been difficult, if mishandled.

When Wisconsin’s President Bergemann assumed the leadership of the newly created Joint Synod, Gausewitz must have been happy to step down to a seat on the Board of Trustees. Once again he was down to one presidential responsibility, but that was the presidency of the Synodical Conference, the largest Lutheran federation in the United States.

When in 1912 ill health prevented Bading from continuing his long Synodical Conference presidency that had begun in 1882, the Conference elected Carl Gausewitz to succeed him. Reelection followed reelection and Gausewitz was still president of the Synodical Conference at the time of his death in 1927. Those early years of the present century were halcyon days for the Conference. Past were the turbulent times of the controversy over conversion and election. Still in the future were the fellowship problems that would bring about the end of the Conference. The presidential years of Gausewitz, 1912–1927, saw the Synodical Conference demonstrating brotherly unity in word and in deed.

What Gausewitz as Conference leader could concern himself about most in the absence of great doctrinal or administrative problems, was a work of the Conference dear to his heart, the mission to the Blacks in this country. His obituary testifies that he, “as president of the Synodical Conference always showed a keen interest in this Synodical Conference mission endeavor in that he regularily attended meetings of the committee.…At these meetings Pastor Gausewitz…followed the deliberations with great interest and aided matters with his well-considered, sensible advice.”11 The 1928 Synodical Conference convention paid this tribute to its former president: “Especially the Negro Missions have lost in him a valuable friend and a zealous promoter of their cause.”12

Pedagogue
These presidential posts obviously received much attention when obituaries had to be written in 1927 for this outstanding leader in our Lutheran circles, who died suddenly in the Grace sacristy just before the Holy Communion service on Sept. 4. More important, however, then and especially later was the service Gausewitz rendered through work on the synodical Catechism.

The first special Catechism project that engaged the attention of Carl Gausewitz was working on a Synodical Conference committee charged with the responsibility of editing Luther’s Small Catechism. The committee was busy at the turn of the century.13

It is this assignment that may well have led to the appointment Gausewitz received to serve on the committee to which President von Rohr assigned the task of carrying out a 1907 synodical resolution: “A double commission to be appointed of which the one will have the assignment to undertake a revision of our German Catechism and the other the assignment to provide a good English translation of this revised German Catechism.”14 The committee, which could have rivaled any synodical committee of that time in prestige and ability consisted of Prof. Ernst, Prof. Schaller, President Soll, and Pastor Gausewitz.15 Catechism work was serious business in those days.

The committee seems to have had difficulty in getting on with its assignment. The 1909 Proceedings are silent on the subject and the 1910 Preceedings insist that “the Synod ought to proceed as quickly as possible with the publication of the German Catechism” and that Teacher R. Albrecht should be added to the committee.16 After another silence in 1911 the synodical convention in 1912 must have taken cum grano salis the promise that the revised Catechism would be out in fall, for it specifically resolved that the committee on publications “should speed up the production of the new German and English Catechism.”17

That there were good reasons for such concerns soon became evident. The next synodical convention accepted a floor committee report that expressed “regrets that the new edition of the Catechism in German and English had not yet appeared.” Then it resolved that “the present committee for producing the Catechism be discharged and the production of the Catechism be entrusted to one man.”18 That one man was Carl Gausewitz. President Bergemann, who selected the one man, was in later years, when dispensing administrative lore, fond of citing this as the classic instance of the superiority of one good man over a committee in getting a difficult task well done.19 Despite the heavy work load described previously, Gausewitz went to work and by 1917 the Catechism in both languages was available at the Northwestern Publishing House.

When the book appeared Prof. John Schaller, who had served with Gausewitz on the original committee, provided a substantial review in the Theologische Quartalschrift running to almost six pages.20 He stated, “One could boldly claim that our publishing house has up to now not brought out any book that is of greater practical significance for the edification of the church than this explanation of the Catechism.”21

After 39 years a revision appeared that is currently being revised. Much of Gausewitz, however, remained in the revision and his pedagogical and catechetical labors are still providing benefits in the present time.

Outstanding features of the Gausewitz edition that Schaller pointed to in his 1917 review were: footnotes that defined difficult terms; carefully selected Bible history material used, not as proof of a point of doctrine, but in order to present and develop the point of doctrine; clear and pointed questions and answers.22

Above all, the gospel tone of the work is praised. “Here the gospel appears,” writes Schaller, “not only as one of the matters that are also treated, but as the precious bond that runs through the whole Catechism, ties all of its sentences tightly together, and alone makes possible its biblically correct understanding…Whoever has actually recognized and experienced this special feature of the new Catechism will because of it love the book the more and will therefore gladly accept as part of the bargain the flaws he finds in it.”23

Ten years after the Catechism appeared Gausewitz died, very likely never imagining how long and how much the work would be of benefit. One wonders if he even regarded it as his chef d’oeuvre. President Bergemann commenting on Gausewitz’ death in his next convention report doesn’t even mention the Catechism. He says:

Pastor Carl Gausewitz has been taken from our midst by a sudden death. That was sad news! The man, who in our midst was a leader, who just a few weeks previously had strengthened and stablished the synodical convention in its trust in the Scripture through his magnificant essay, the man who with his discerning eye, with his quiet, sober judgment just in this difficult time could render us outstanding service, has been taken from us.24

President Bergemann certainly appreciated the catechetical labors of Carl Gausewitz. It was just that there were so many other good and important things to be said about the man at the time of his passing that the one item was not included. Those other things are being blurred for us by the passing of a half century and more. The one item, however, still looms large. And that is the reason why in this Catechism anniversary publication Gausewitz is being given attention “as churchman and catechist.”

Notes
1 W.H. (Walther Hoenecke) “† Pastor Carl Gausewitz †” in Ev.-Luth. Gemeinde-Blatt, LXII (Sept. 25, 1927), 305. Hereafter referred to as Gemeinde-Blatt Obituary.
2 Wisconsin Synod Proceedings, 1860, p. 7.
3 For the details see the Gemeinde-Blatt Obituary and the Northwestern Lutheran counterpart, issue of Oct. 2, 1927. 
4 Wisconsin Synod Proceedings, 1885, p. 78.
5 This detail and those that follow are supplied in A. Kuhn, ed., Geschichte der Minnesota Synode und ihrer einzelnen Gemeinden (St. Louis: Louis Lange Publishing House, 1909). The story of St. John’s of St. Paul is found on pp 230–238. The work is hereafter cited as Minnesota Geschichte.
6 The previous footnote supplies the general location. The specific page is 236.
time of his death. He was a member of the governing board for both Northwestern College and the Theological Seminary. For seventeen years he was chairman of the Lutheran city missions of Milwaukee.
7 Minnesota Geschichte, p. 38.
8 Minnesota Geschichte, pp. 49–50.
9 General Synod Proceedings, 1903, p. 6.
10 General Synod Proceedings, 1905 and 1907, p. 8 in both instances.
11 Gemeinde-Blatt Obituary, p. 306.
12 Synodical Conference Proceedings, 1928, p. 60.
13 Synodical Conference Proceedings, 1896–1902. This project is mentioned in the following places: 1896, p. 65; 1898, pp. 49–50; 1900, pp. 60–61; 1902, pp. 74–75.
14 Wisconsin Proceedings, 1907, p. 92. Reports in the Proceedings on the production of the new Catechism appear here and subsequently in the Bericht des Buchhandlungkomitees, usually printed in the Proceedings as one of the last reports. The Catechism being revised was that which resulted from the early 1880s catechetical efforts at providing a simplified, uniform publication. For details see H. Wicke, “WELS and Luther’s Small Catechism,” in the Northwestern Lutheran, LXVI (Feb. 4, 1979), p. 37.
15 Wisconsin Proceedings, 1908, p. 32.
16 Wisconsin Proceedings, 1910, p. 95.
17 Wisconsin Proceedings, 1912, pp. 112–113.
18 Wisconsin Proceedings, 1913, pp. 114–115.
19 Obviously this is not written down any place in the record. Bergemann wrote little, but he was at his best when providing orally guidance and correction to young men who needed it badly. The writer was one of those who benefited from such invaluable on-thejob training.
20 J. Schaller, Dr. Martin Luther’s Kleiner Katechismus, Theologische Quartalschrift, XIV (April 1917) 165–170. Hereafter cited as Schaller, Review.
21 Schaller, Review, p. 165.
22 Schaller, Review, pp. 165–166.
23 Schaller, Review, pp. 168–169.
24 Wisconsin Proceedings, 1929, p. 7. The 1927 Gausewitz essay referred to is “Why Do I Believe That the Bible is the Word of God?” The convention ordered that it be printed separately in English and German for free distribution in the congregations. The “difficult time” is a reference to the Protes’tant matter.

Save Money - Attend Yale Divinity Instead of Concordia Seminary



bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "One Year at Yale University--Room, Board, Tuition,...":

While it's true that Yale U does charge that much for normal degrees, the seminary part (divinity school) of Yale U charges less than Concordia Ft. Wayne does at $21,642. Ft. Wayne wants its conquistadors to raid the US Treasury and otherwise come up with $21,150, and Concordia St. Louis wants not much less from its conquistadors.

Now, a M. Div from Yale U is probably worth every penny they charge (in worldly terms, of course), but a student paying that much for a LCMS M. Div. is taking a real risk--testing God even.

Someone might say that the Concordia sems help the student with tuition, but all the other universities and seminaries do as much or more proportionate to the total student bill, and nearly all of them are much less expensive to start with.

Seminary Costs Compared:

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2010/12/bruce-church-httpsbruce-church.html

Forward in Reverse - Making Each New Version Worse Than Before - Just Like Their Translations


Carl F. W. Gausewitz wrote the catechism used by WELS until 1956, when it was revised and expanded. In 1982, it was replaced by Kuske's. NPH no longer sells Gausewitz and will have to shred their NIV books.



New WELS catechism, 1982





For the fourth time in the 132-year history of the Wisconsin Synod a new edition of Luther's small catechism is being offered to its churches. On July 1 the Board for Parish Education published the new book, Luther's Catechism: The Small Catechism of Dr. Martin Lather and an Exposition for Children and Adults Written in Contemporary English.

The first catechism used by the Synod was the Dresden Catechism--in German, of course. This was followed by the Gausewitz catechism of 1917, written by Pastor Carl Gausewitz, who was the pastor of Grace Lutheran Church of Milwaukee from 1956 to 1927.The Gausewitz catechism was available in both English and German, but the German, according to one chronicler, "was never in much demand." In 1956 a thorough revision of the Gausewitz catechism was published, a cooperative work of eight years. The revision with its 247 pages added 100 pages to the Gausewitz original.

Professor David P. Kuske who teaches in the Christian education department at Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary wrote the 1982 edition of the catechism. The 247 pages of the Gausewitz revision are replaced by an entirely new exposition of 392 pages in a page size somewhat larger.

The prepublication offer lists a number of features in the new catechism:
* Bible passages from the New International Version
* Pertinent words and phrases of Bible passages in italics
* Original diagrams illustrating doctrines and Scriptural truths [UOJ introduced]
* A glossary of terms and pronouncing vocabulary
* Two-color printing

***

GJ - I have ordered the original Gausewitz and the expanded 1956 version. Notice that Kuske's new version was even larger than the expanded Gausewitz. That is why I prefer Luther's Small Catechism, without Talmudic growth and expansion and obfuscation.

Ignoring the Central Doctrine


Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "There Is Only One Road":

Scott states, "I do believe both sides are fighting."

My personal opinion is that unless they are fighting to defend and promote Justification by Faith Alone they are simply beating the air. They oppose the flamboyant New Age Emergents in their midst but ignore their handlers and enablers. When they both trust, confess and defend the false gospel of Universal Objective Justification both sides stand condemned by Christ and likewise the Lutheran Confessions.

The Intrepids have not identified this core problem with their denomination and, on a larger scale, Lutheranism as a whole.

Here is a quote from an Intrepid that was sent via personal email to me: "3.) While I agree that UOJ is alive in well in WELS, I've got to tell you the honest to heaven truth - most of the guys spouting this stuff don't even know what they're talking about, and would NOT know the difference between UOJ and the real, confessional, orthodox teaching if you put a gun to their feeble little heads and were going to blow their brains out! Sad, but true. Why do I know this? Real simple, my friend - and I'm not proud to say this, but neither am I bashful - because for years and years such was true of ME! (And sometimes still is!) The old "opinio legis" is, after all, alive and well, in WELS Pastors as much as anyone else.

So - bottom line - if you want to continue to beat this tired, old, dead, rotting horse, have at it. Maybe we need a few good, stout, fellows like you around all the time, just to remind us of the nasty little secret that lies within us.

But, maybe, just maybe, you might want to turn your vinegar hose on - oh say - the lack of confessional study, or the dearth of doctrinal discipline, or the women ministers, or the puny sacramental theology, etc., etc., etc., in the WELS instead.

Truly, and I really mean this, I for one am happy to have you around on commenting on Intrepid. I don't mind it at all. I just thought perhaps I'd give you some food for thought. If you consider it Cheeze-Whiz, so be it. If you think it some fine filet, that's good. Whatever.

Don't wear yourself out, ol' boy, on UOJ. There's just not much of a battle there, whether there should be or not.


The Lutheran Synods perversion of the Gospel of Christ, Justification by Faith in Christ Alone, is seen by the only openly contending Lutheran group as being a tired, old, dead and rotting horse and not worth fighting over.

A sign of the times.