Friday, November 18, 2011

The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests Issued a Statement to WELS

WELS headquarters - Hochmuth had pornographic photos and videos of young boys here.


SNAP Response

The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests released a statement on this case.

"If the charges against Hochmuth turn out to be credible, it is important to know what steps the Synod president is going to implement to protect children. (The synod president) should immediately notify the congregations of the Synod of the charges that have been made against Hochmuth," SNAP said.

 Read more: http://www.wisn.com/news/29790392/detail.html#ixzz1e7mE5HLS

SNAP News

---

Journal Sentinel Update

---

Viewing is possession, the court rules.

---

Faith Watch


Wisconsin Synod President Claims Uncertainty 48 Hours after Hochmuth Confessed to Federal Crimes.
Hochmuth Fired Friday

WELS Synod President Mark Schroeder


AC V has left a new comment on your post "Readers' Comments on the WELS Child Pornography Ca...":

Time line:

Thursday night, Schroeder "Together":

"We take allegations such as these very seriously and emphasize that WELS has absolutely no tolerance for the kind of behavior that has been alleged. Hochmuth’s employment with the synod has been suspended until the facts of the case are fully known."

Wednesday night, various news sources:

"The Rev. Mark Schroeder, president of WELS, said he learned about Hochmuth’s arrest Wednesday evening ... The church official knows limited details about Hochmuth’s arrest, he said, mostly gained from a police report and information in the media."

Tuesday, various news sources:

"A Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod employee was arrested Tuesday on child pornography charges, according to Waukesha police."

"Hochmuth told authorities that the number of images found on his computer in Waukesha 'was nothing compared to what they would find in his office,' the complaint states."

----

Criminal Complaint:

Tuesday:

...and officers obtained a warrant to search the defendant’s residence on November 15, 2011...


The defendant admitted to using the home computer in the basement to upload and download these images at least once.  At one point, the defendant’s wife caught him viewing these images, and they had gone to counseling as a result...

Officers then executed a search warrant at the defendant’s office, and they located a computer as well as three thumb drives.  


---







by Michele McCormack
Story Created: Nov 18, 2011 CST
Story Updated: Nov 18, 2011 


WAUKESHA- On Friday, Joel Hochmuth, the communications director of a local church group posted bail after being arrested on child porn charges.


Bail had been set at $20,000 Thursday after the 52 year old was formally charged with three counts of possessing child pornography.


Within hours, The Rev. Mark Schroeder, president of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, released the following statement:


"We immediately suspended Mr. Hochmuth after learning of this matter and effective today his employment was terminated. Communication duties have been reassigned internally, and we are moving forward with our work and our ministry.


"WELS holds it employees to high ethical and moral standards; we will not and cannot tolerate behavior that goes against these principles. As we've shared with our Church leadership nationwide, we continue to pray for all who have been affected by these events, and we are cooperating fully with the authorities as this matter works its way through the legal process."




The criminal complaint say Hockmuth admitted to struggling with a pornography problem.


His lawyer later qualified the statement that it was an adult porn addiction not child porn.


Investigators executive a search warrant on his Waukesha County home Wednesday and say they found multiple images of child porn.


---


Criminal Complaint:


"The defendant stated that he has been struggling with an addiction to viewing pornographic photos and videos of young boys in sexually explicit poses."
 

Catholics are buying bankrupt Crystal Cathedral megachurch | The Lookout - Yahoo! News

Catholics are buying bankrupt Crystal Cathedral megachurch | The Lookout - Yahoo! News:

Schuller started the Church Growth Movement.
Now he is watching the monument to his ego sold to the Roman Catholic Church.
If only Paul Kelm had organized his cell groups there...


'via Blog this'

Intrepid Lutherans: Some musings on the article of election

Intrepid Lutherans: Some musings on the article of election:

GJ - The article on election in the Formula of Concord should be studied and re-read by everyone.

'via Blog this'

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Intrepid Lutherans: Some musings on the article of...":

Note that there is additional significance to the Book of Concord addressing the doctrine of Election.

Those who defend and promote the false gospel of Universal Objective Justification know that the teaching is not taught in the BOC. When challenged on this they will invariably state that the BOC was only intent on addressing the Roman Catholic Church's false gospel of Work Righteousness by teaching Subjective Justification and as such never addresses Objective Justification. This is a baseless lie since the doctrine of Election was not under contention but included in the BOC in order to make a clear confession. If the authors of the BOC clarified their confession on the unchallenged doctrine of Election why didn't they clearly and fully document their confession of UOJ? UOJ is even more offensive to the RCC since it declares not only those with faith forgiven but the whole unbelieving world forgiven and righteous -regardless of works.

UOJ isn't in the BOC because it isn't taught in Scripture and in fact contradicts and perverts Christ's pure Word.

***

GJ - Because the Book of Concord is not taught adequately, few realize the genius level of the theologians around Luther. God certainly provided two or more generations of faithful, orthodox, prolific Gospel leaders.

  • Luther and Melanchthon were two of the greatest theologians of all time.
  • Both men trained Martin Chemnitz, senior editor of the Book of Concord.
  • Chytraeus wrote works that were kept in print over 100 years.
  • Polycarp Leyser also served as an editor of the Lutheran Symbols (as they are sometimes called).
  • Chemnitz worked with J. Gerhard, co-authoring a giant work.
  • Gerhard produced some of the finest works of Christian theology, now available in English through Repristination Press.


This is significant because the men from the Book of Concord generation slapped down the ridiculous UOJ of Samuel Huber and kicked his Enthusiastic rear off the faculty at Wittenberg.

Leyser, who wrote the biography of Chemnitz, was one of those men. Huber taught that every single person was justified, forgiven, saved.


WELS Northwestern College Professor Was Chairman of the First Gay Lutheran Seminary,
UOJ Advocate

Richard Jungkuntz taught UOJ at the WELS convention.
Later he became chairman of the board for Seminex,
the official seminary of the Metropolitan Community Church.
David Deppe was one of the Seminex professors.
Here is the UOJ WELS essay.


Readers' Comments on the WELS Child Pornography Case.
Joel Hochmuth Confessed.
Why Is He Suspended, Not Fired?
Who Is Paying His High-end Lawyer?



bored has left a new comment on your post "What is Child Pornography? Violating Federal Law a...":

WHO is paying for Bucher to defend him? That guy ain't cheap. Whose going to be paying for the 20 large to get him out of jail?

I kinda doubt that a Communications Director for the synod is taking enough in to afford that sort of Attorney and Bail. I dunno, maybe I'm a wrong, but it kinda seems like the WELS might be paying for this stuff.

Now THAT would be a good thing for us to find out.

---

AC V has left a new comment on your post "The Olde Synodical Conference Can Stop Blaming the...":

Re: "Since the WELS counseling agency was involved with Joel Hochmuth's problem (dates not given), why was this scandal and crime allowed to worsen?"

If it was a WELS counseling agency, that is a good question, especially since Schroeder said, "We take allegations such as these very seriously and emphasize that WELS has absolutely no tolerance for the kind of behavior that has been alleged." ("alleged"? Hochmuth himself admitted it!!)

---

SuzieQ has left a new comment on your post "What is Child Pornography? Violating Federal Law a...":

Thank you for posting this. It seems many are adopting the it depends what is "is" in this case.

I am shocked and horrified at the response by Synod.

They need to do the RIGHT thing and Fire him!!

---

Emmy0417 has left a new comment on your post "The Olde Synodical Conference Can Stop Blaming the...":

Until you have walked in any of these men's shoes, do not be so quick to judge. You are assuming that Schroeder knew about this when you have no proof other than your own judgement. The WELS is neither Anti-Lutheran nor Anti-Confessional. Ichabod needs to focus on the people involved and not tarnishing the names of those affected by the outcome.

GJ - Possession of child pornography is a federal crime, a crime that took place at the Wisconsin Synod headquarters building.

---

SuzieQ has left a new comment on your post "More on Frey's Resignation - From WELS Laity, Curr...":

From a lay persons point of view - do you understand how much damage is being done?

SOULS are in the balance.

What exactly do you mean by sanctioned apostasy?

Why is there no transparency in what is happening in the Synod and in our congregations?

Maybe if there was it would lessen these serious blows to the membership. (You know the less worthy people you are suppose to be serving.) The pity party for leaving the ministry is lost on me. Or am I wrong it's not suppose to be about YOU. I've heard this whining for too long.

I'd appreciate some dumbing down for us laypeople who care about WELS and want to stay WELS. (For the RIGHT reasons.)

I'd also like to know if Joel is Hochmuth? I am shocked at SP prayers first going for the deviant sexual offender and then to unspecified children of molesters.

Anyone who buys or downloads child porn is guilty of raping that child.

Hochmuth isn't repentant or he'd cough up his suppliers and all the others he's shared with. Instead of having his attorney say it's just adult porn.

Why haven't they asked him to resign like Frey?

I hope the FBI searches all the Synod offices. They obviously won't police themselves. They are not above the law.

Remember the Millstone - who's all wearing it?

I want to know!



---

SuzieQ has left a new comment on your post "WELS Love Shack - Update: $20K Bail for WELS Commu...":

It's reported Joel's wife and he attend counseling for his addiction. Was this provided by WELS Synod (as it is in most cases)? If so then WELS would have known about their employee's problem. This is not the first time WELS has had this type of problem and had to pay for it.

Why don't they don't check their employees computers for inappropriate usage?

The WELS Synod sent out an email which asks for prayers:

1st for the accused pedophile Joel and his family, and 2nd the children who were raped, photographed and videotaped against their will - do they not realize their employee was satisfying his deviant sexual appetite using children - and in their offices? They have their priorities and thinking backwards.

"FBI agent used peer-to-peer software which allowed him to connect with Hochmuth's computer and browse for files, and says Hochmuth was sharing child porn. The agent says he also chatted with Hochmuth online, and Hockmuch allegedly told him he likes pictures of males 10 years of age or older. " "Investigators found several hundred images on his home computer and 310 photographs and 38 videos on a purple thumb drive recovered from his WELS office."

Child Porn charges filed against church official

If this man is guilty and repentant he wouldn't allow his Attorney to lie and say he only had an adult porn problem.

---

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "What is Child Pornography? Violating Federal Law a...":

SuzieQ is right. Hochmuth is not contesting the charges, so there's no reason to think it's all a big mistake, and therefore there's enough information to fire him. Hochmuth is not a victim of credit card fraud, for instance, where a sicko used stolen credit card info to access a child porn site, for instance.

The suspension is really a reflection of UOJ in action, similar to how the daughter of a deceased DUI victim said God had already forgiven the drunk driver without knowing the first thing about that drunk driver! One would think the WELS is practicing theology under the influence!

The synod's wrath and swift punishment are reserved solely for those who question the synod or UOJ, the only unforgivable sins according to them.

---

LutherRocks has left a new comment on your post "The Olde Synodical Conference Can Stop Blaming the...":

Leading with the Law instead of the Gospel (universal absolution - WELS version) in preaching would go a long long way in the WELS. For every case like this there are dozens of others swept under the rug. Jesus said to go therefore and teach and baptize all nations...teaching them to observe what I have commanded you. That does not mean just preach the Gospel. That means preach Law and Gospel...repentance and only then forgiveness. It is time to turn that upside down evangelism right side up.



---

ea5d4cfc-1238-11e1-be9d-000bcdcb8a73 (https://openid.aol.com/opaque/ea5d4cfc-1238-11e1-be9d-000bcdcb8a73) has left a new comment on your post "Readers' Comments on the WELS Child Pornography Ca...":

http://www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/134144148.html

(notice the time stamp...)

Get your facts straight...your overall assumption that Hochmuth is Satan incarnate is sinful in and of itself. Who are you to judge? Can you read his heart? Concerning the counseling appoints, those are confidential by law. They cannot and could not be shared with the synod. This site and your biased and sinful gossip and opinions make me sick. But then, you probably can't quite here me because the plank is so long...I digress.

---

AC V has left a new comment on your post "Readers' Comments on the WELS Child Pornography Ca...":

One lawyer's opinion:

http://www.cphins.com/LegalResources/tabid/65/iid/228/siid/0/Default.aspx

---

AC V has left a new comment on your post "Readers' Comments on the WELS Child Pornography Ca...":

Time line:

Thursday night, Schroeder "Together":

"We take allegations such as these very seriously and emphasize that WELS has absolutely no tolerance for the kind of behavior that has been alleged. Hochmuth’s employment with the synod has been suspended until the facts of the case are fully known."

Wednesday night, various news sources:

"The Rev. Mark Schroeder, president of WELS, said he learned about Hochmuth’s arrest Wednesday evening ... The church official knows limited details about Hochmuth’s arrest, he said, mostly gained from a police report and information in the media."

Tuesday, various news sources:

"A Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod employee was arrested Tuesday on child pornography charges, according to Waukesha police."

"Hochmuth told authorities that the number of images found on his computer in Waukesha 'was nothing compared to what they would find in his office,' the complaint states."

---

MaryJo (https://openid.aol.com/opaque/c6ef936a-1260-11e1-be45-000bcdcb2996) has left a new comment on your post "WELS Love Shack - Update: $20K Bail for WELS Commu...":

Words cannot even express my disappointment as I view the hurtful words and the visual mockery of someone who clearly needs prayers and forgiveness at an incredibly difficult time. Let he who has no sin cast the first stone. Each of us struggles with sin throughout our life, many of us pet sins, and all are equally detestable in God's eyes. Unfortunately, some sin is more public or illegal in nature. Let's all search our hearts and take a look in the mirror lest we find ourselves guilty of sin against the eighth commandment, especially against a fellow Christian who already knows he has done wrong. It makes me want to cry for Joel and his wife and teenage son that such horrifying treatment is given to his story here on this blog. No truly Christian person could possibly delight in this website. Satan, I'm sure, has it set as his online home page, however.

***

GJ - MaryJo has an opaque ID to hide her identity. This is from the Church and Change sorority. Hochmuth and his enablers mocked the Gospel by victimizing underaged boys, downloading and sharing extremely pornographic photos and videos. Like the MLC gay video, those files will exist forever on the Net.

This is not new. Luther said that the people of his time worshiped those cardinals who were satisfied with a woman. The WELS church workers--pastors and teachers alike--have a serious underground network of offenders. That has been ratified by three different knowledgeable sources.

---

norcal763 has left a new comment on your post "Readers' Comments on the WELS Child Pornography Ca...":

To "MaryJo": I know Hochmuth's family-at least his father and sister, and I know them WELL. They are good people. His father, a Pastor, was a spiritual mentor to me. I met Joel once and I really liked him. But Honey, I read the Police Report and I ain't cryin' for NOBODY tonight but the kids that were brutalized so Joel could get his jollies. I am especially not crying for his wife, who should have turned his sorry butt IN!

***

GJ - Various people had a duty to report this crime. They did not. Others failed in their supervisory responsibilities and pastor roles. This happened in a sect where pastors excommunicate someone for asking questions - within weeks. Right is wrong, and wrong is right.

When I published the truth about the MLC gay video, Synod President Mark Schroeder rebuked me through Pastor Herman Otten (who sided with him). And yet, when federal crimes were committed by his own communications director, in his own office , Schroeder was publicly hoping the police raid and the charges were a mistake.

What is Child Pornography?
Violating Federal Law at WELS Headquarters -
But Hochmuth Not Fired?

What is Child Pornography?:

http://www.wels.net/spiritual-help/my-life-issues/homosexuality?page=0,0
---

rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "The Olde Synodical Conference Can Stop Blaming the...":

At my place of employment, viewing porn on company computers will find you on the outside looking in very quickly. Many private businesses are more ethical and moral than some church denominations. I gathered from the TV news report that the investigation is not over. There are leaving the door open for any possible victims to come forward and also anyone else who may have had contact. The WELS way does not cut it with prosecutors and law enforcement. If only the WELS leadership had been as forthright with their members in the past as President Schroeder promises to be with secular authorities, Ichabod might have fewer daily page reads.

---



What is Child Pornography?

Under federal law (18 U.S.C. §2256), child pornography1 is defined as any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where  
  • the production of the visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
  • the visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
  • the visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.  
Federal law (18 U.S.C. §1466A) also criminalizes knowingly producing, distributing, receiving, or possessing with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting, that
  • depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene, or
  • depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex and such depiction lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
Sexually explicit conduct is defined under federal law (18 U.S.C. §2256) as actual or simulated sexual intercourse (including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex), bestiality, masturbation, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.

Who Is a Minor?
For purposes of enforcing the federal law (18 U.S.C. §2256), “minor” is defined as a person under the age of 18.

Is Child Pornography a Crime?
Yes, it is a federal crime to knowingly possess, manufacture, distribute, or access with intent to view child pornography (18 U.S.C. §2252).  In addition, all 50 states and the District of Columbia have laws criminalizing the possession, manufacture, and distribution of child pornography.  As a result, a person who violates these laws may face federal and/or state charges.  

Where Is Child Pornography Predominantly Found?
Child pornography exists in multiple formats including print media, videotape, film, CD-ROM, or DVD.  It is transmitted on various platforms within the Internet including newsgroups, Internet Relay Chat (chatrooms), Instant Message, File Transfer Protocol, e-mail, websites, and peer-to-peer technology.

What Motivates People Who Possess Child Pornography?
Limited research about the motivations of people who possess child pornography suggests that child pornography possessors are a diverse group, including people who are
  • sexually interested in prepubescent children or young adolescents, who use child pornography for sexual fantasy and gratification
  • sexually “indiscriminate,” meaning they are constantly looking for new and different sexual stimuli
  • sexually curious, downloading a few images to satisfy that curiosity
  • interested in profiting financially by selling images or setting up web sites requiring payment for access2
Who Possesses Child Pornography?
It is difficult to describe a “typical” child pornography possessor because there is not just one type of person who commits this crime. 
In a study of 1,713 people arrested for the possession of child pornography in a 1-year period, the possessors ran the gamut in terms of income, education level, marital status, and age.  Virtually all of those who were arrested were men, 91% were white, and most were unmarried at the time of their crime, either because they had never married (41%) or because they were separated, divorced, or widowed (21%).3
Forty percent (40%) of those arrested were “dual offenders,” who sexually victimized children and possessed child pornography, with both crimes discovered in the same investigation. An additional 15% were dual offenders who attempted to sexually victimize children by soliciting undercover investigators who posed online as minors.4

Who Produces Child Pornography? Based on information provided by law enforcement to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children's Child Victim Identification Program, more than half of the child victims were abused by someone who had legitimate access to them such as parents, other relatives, neighborhood/family friends, babysitters, and coaches. 

What is the Nature of These Images?
The content in these illegal images varies from exposure of genitalia to graphic sexual abuse, such as penetration by objects, anal penetration, and bestiality.
Of the child pornography victims identified by law enforcement, 42% appear to be pubescent, 52% appear to be prepubescent, and 6% appear to be infants or toddlers.
What Are the Effects of Child Pornography on the Child Victim?
It is important to realize that these images are crime scene photos – they are a permanent record of the abuse of a child. The lives of the children featured in these illegal images and videos are forever altered.

Once these images are on the Internet, they are irretrievable and can continue to circulate forever. The child is revictimized as the images are viewed again and again.


End Notes

1 As stated by Janis Wolak, Kimberly Mitchell, and David Finkelhor in Internet Sex Crimes Against Minors: The Response of Law Enforcement (Alexandria, Virginia: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, November 2003, page vii), “The term ‘child pornography,’ because it implies simply conventional pornography with child subjects, is an inappropriate term to describe the true nature and extent of sexually exploitive images of child victims. Use of this term should not be taken to imply that children ‘consented’ to the sexual acts depicted in these photographs; however, it is the term most readily recognized by the public, at this point in time, to describe this form of child sexual exploitation. It is used in this [document] to refer to illegal pictorial material involving children under the standards developed by statute, case law, and law-enforcement-agency protocols. It is hoped a more accurate term will be recognized, understood, and accepted for use in the near future.”
2 Janis Wolak, David Finkelhor, and Kimberly Mitchell.  Child-Pornography Possessors Arrested in Internet-Related Crimes: Findings From the National Juvenile Online Victimization Study (Alexandria, Virginia: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, 2005, page  x) citing Eva J. Klain, Heather J. Davies, Molly A. Hicks.  Child Pornography: The Criminal-Justice-System Response (Alexandria, Virginia: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, March 2001) and M. Taylor and E. Quayle. Child pornography: An Internet crime. Hove: Brunner-Routledge, 2003.
3 Id., pages 1-3.
4 Id., page viii.


'via Blog this'

---

US Department of Justice


By the mid-1980's, the trafficking of child pornography within the United States had been almost completely eradicated through a series of successful campaigns waged by law enforcement. Child pornographers had become lonely and hunted individuals. Producing child abuse images was both difficult and expensive, and reproducing images was equally difficult and expensive. Purchasing and trading such images was extremely risky. Anonymous distribution and receipt was not possible and it was difficult for pedophiles to find and interact with each other. Unfortunately, technology has changed the situation.

Producing child abuse images has now become easy and inexpensive. The Internet allows images and digitized movies to be reproduced and disseminated to tens of thousands of individuals at the click of a button. The distribution and receipt of such images can be done almost anonymously. As a result, child pornography is readily available through virtually every Internet technology (web sites, email, instant messaging/ICQ, Internet Relay Chat (IRC), newsgroups/bulletin boards, and peer-to-peer). The technological ease, lack of expense, and anonymity in obtaining and distributing child pornography has resulted in an explosion in the availability, accessibility, and volume of child pornography.

CEOS works with the 93 United States Attorney offices around the country and investigative agencies to vigorously combat this growing problem. By maintaining a coordinated, national-level law enforcement focus, including coordinating nationwide and international investigations and prosecutions, CEOS works to deter the production, distribution and possession of child pornography by aggressively investigating and prosecuting of these crimes. Additionally, CEOS works with law enforcement to identify victims used to produce child pornography with the goal of rescuing the victims and preventing continued abuse of these children.

Reporting Child Pornography

To report an incident involving the possession, distribution, receipt, or production of child pornography, go to the website operated by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). Your report will be forwarded to a law enforcement agency for investigation and action.

The Olde Synodical Conference Can Stop Blaming the Catholics:
Lessons from the WELS Joel Hochmuth Arrest.
Penn State at WELS Headquarters Building

Joel Hochmuth, WELS Commuications Director, right,
and his criminal defense attorney, at Hochmuth's arraignment.

DIYGirl has left a new comment on your post "The Olde Synodical Conference Can Stop Blaming the...":

Now is not the time for your trademark "humor" in tearing the WELS apart.

You should be offering prayers for this man as he struggles, and especially prayers for anyone affected by his problems.

Your cartoons are distasteful this time around and you ought to be ashamed. 

***

GJ - A WELS member created the graphic. You ought to  be ashamed of leaders who re-victimized abused boys by letting this go on at The Love Shack. The graphic expresses his or her feelings about the synod's doctrine and practice.

---


Count me as one of the few people not surprised by the arrest of a WELS headquarters staffer. The WELS approach to all scandals has been:
  1. Deny the facts.
  2. Hide the evidence.
  3. Play stupid.
  4. Attack anyone who questions this approach.
  5. Trash the families of the innocent.
  6. Reward the offender.
WELS is a corrupt, abusive sect, anti-Lutheran and anti-Confessional.

Some questions need to be asked:

  • Since the WELS counseling agency was involved with Joel Hochmuth's problem (dates not given), why was this scandal and crime allowed to worsen?
  • WELS has an overpaid Shrinker in charge of technology at The Love Shack, but no one knew hundreds of deviant photos and videos were being used there? 
  • No uploading or downloading? No viewing? Why were all those files at WELS headquarters when some were also at his home, where the first raid took place?
  • How many WELS workers were sharing files with Hochmuth, since they have such strict fellowship rules?
  • How can Synod President Mark Schroeder cluck his tongue in public about ELCA's gay agenda, work with ELCA, support the MLC gay video, and act surprised at the results?
  • When will WELS connect its universal absolution (UOJ) nonsense with its own antinomian behavior?

Mark Schroeder shredded his own credibility when he acted dumb about a police raid on a staffer's home, a staffer's arrest, and a police raid on 2929 Mayfair Road, WELS headquarters. He hoped it was all a big mistake, but he must have known about Hochmuth's problem.

WELS is a sect where a DP will march in and fire a pastor on the spot - for questioning the synod. But Hochmuth has the WELS headquarters building involved in federal crimes against children. Hochmuth is "suspended."

Schroeder knows that the official complaint lists photos and videos found at his own office building. The media contents are described as graphic acts involving young boys, aged 10 to 14.

"The defendant stated that what would be found on his home computer was nothing compared to what they would find in his office." 


---







We have some very sad and disturbing news to share with you.

On Wed., Nov. 16, we were informed that WELS Director of Communications Mr. Joel Hochmuth was arrested on charges of possessing child pornography. Acting on a tip from the FBI Cyber Crimes Task Force, officers executed search warrants at his home and at the synod administration building and seized computers and other items as a part of their investigation.

At this time, we know only what was contained in the police report and reported in the media. Those reports indicate that images of child pornography were found on the seized computers and on data storage devices.

Hochmuth has been employed for the past five years in the WELS administrative headquarters as the director of communications.

We take allegations such as these very seriously and emphasize that WELS has absolutely no tolerance for the kind of behavior that has been alleged. Hochmuth’s employment with the synod has been suspended until the facts of the case are fully known.

We have informed the authorities that we are committed to cooperate fully with them in their investigation.

We pray for God’s gracious care and healing for the Hochmuth family.

We pray for the innocent victims of the production and distribution of child pornography wherever and whenever it occurs.

We also ask for your continuing prayers for our synod. Satan is truly a powerful enemy seeking to undermine and destroy God’s people and his church. But we pray that our heavenly Father would remind us that we have a more powerful God who promises that the gates of hell itself will not prevail against his church.

Serving with you in Christ,
Rev. Mark Schroeder, WELS President

More pedophilia scandal in Pennsylvania, Secret Sex-Crime files, & trial this winter



More pedophilia scandal in Pennsylvania, Secret Sex-Crime files, & trial this winter:


The five co-defendants sit close enough to shake hands in the Philadelphia courtroom, but they never once acknowledge one another. Father James Brennan, a 47-year-old priest accused of raping a 14-year-old boy, looks sad and stooped in a navy sweater, unshaven and sniffling. Edward Avery, a defrocked priest in his sixties, wears an unsettlingly pleasant expression on his face, as though he's mentally very far away. He and two other defendants – the Rev. Charles Engelhardt, also in his sixties, and Bernard Shero, a former Catholic schoolteacher in his forties – are accused of passing around "Billy," a fifth-grade altar boy. According to the charges, the three men raped and sodomized the 10-year-old, sometimes making him perform stripteases or getting him drunk on sacramental wine after Mass.


Heinous as the accusations are, the most shocking – and significant – are those against the fifth defendant, Monsignor William Lynn. At 60, Lynn is portly and dignified, his thin lips pressed together and his double chin held high. In a dramatic fashion statement, he alone has chosen to wear his black clerical garb today, a startling reminder that this is a priest on trial, a revered representative of the Catholic Church, not to mention a high-ranking official in Philadelphia's archdiocese. Lynn, who reported directly to the cardinal, was the trusted custodian of a trove of documents known in the church as the "Secret Archives files." The files prove what many have long suspected: that officials in the upper echelons of the church not only tolerated the widespread sexual abuse of children by priests but conspired to hide the crimes and silence the victims. Lynn is accused of having been the archdiocese's sex-abuse fixer, the man who covered up for its priests. Incredibly, after a scandal that has rocked the church for a generation, he is the first Catholic official ever criminally charged for the cover-up.

"All rise," the court crier intones as the judge enters, and Lynn stands, flanked by his high-powered lawyers, whose hefty fees are being paid by the archdiocese. The implications of the trial are staggering for the church as a whole. In sheltering abusive priests, Lynn wasn't some lone wolf with monstrous sexual appetites, as the church has taken to portraying priests who have molested children. According to two scathing grand-jury reports, protocols for protecting rapists in the clergy have been in place in Philadelphia for half a century, under the regimes of three different cardinals. Lynn was simply a company man, a faithful bureaucrat who did his job exceedingly well. His actions were encouraged by his superiors, who in turn received orders from their superiors – an unbroken chain of command stretching all the way to Rome. In bringing conspiracy charges against Lynn, the Philadelphia district attorney is making a bold statement: that the Catholic hierarchy's failure to protect children from sexual abuse isn't the fault of an inept medieval bureaucracy, but rather the deliberate and criminal work of a cold and calculating organization. In a very real sense, it's not just Lynn who is on trial here. It's the Catholic Church itself.

The deluge of sexual-abuse cases in America's largest religious denomination began in 1985, when a Louisiana priest was sentenced to 20 years in prison after admitting to sexually abusing 37 boys. But it wasn't until 2002, when civil suits in Boston revealed that Cardinal Bernard Law had shielded rapist priests, that the extent of the scandal became widely known. In Germany, the church is overwhelmed by hundreds of alleged victims, and investigations are under way in Austria and the Netherlands. In Ireland, the government recently issued a scathing report that documents how Irish clergy – with tacit approval from the Vatican – covered up the sexual abuse of children as recently as 2009.

Battered by civil suits and bad press, the church has responded with a head-spinning mix of contrition and deflection, blaming anti-Catholic bias and the church's enemies for paying undue attention to the crisis. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops helped fund a $1.8 million study of sex-abuse cases against priests, but the results read like a mirthless joke: To lower the number of clergy classified as "pedophiles," the report redefines "puberty" as beginning at age 10 – and then partially blames the rise in child molesting on the counterculture of the 1960s. The church also insists that any sex crimes by priests are a thing of the past. "The abuse crisis," the study's lead author concluded, "is over.

That echoed statements by Archbishop Timothy Dolan of New York, who went on 60 Minutes declaring the scandal "nothing less than hideous" and then, with a sweep of his hand, announced, "That's over with!" Dolan, in turn, sounded a lot like Bishop Wilton Gregory, the former president of the USCCB, who framed the lie more eloquently: "The terrible history recorded here is history." That was in 2004, seven years ago.

Given how the innermost workings of Catholic culture have long been cloaked in secrecy, the case in Philadelphia offers a rare opportunity to understand why the cover-up of sexual abuse has continued for so long, despite the church's repeated promises of reform. The answer, in large part, lies in the mindset of the church's rigid hierarchy, which promotes officials who are willing to do virtually anything they're told, so long as it's in God's name. "It's almost like the type of stuff you see in cult behavior," says a former Philadelphia priest who asked not to be identified for fear of retribution. "Someone on the outside would say, 'That's crazy.' But when you're on the inside, you say, 'It's perfectly right, because everything is divinely inspired.' If you have a monopoly on God, you can get away with anything.

Long before he became the guardian of the church's secrets, Bill Lynn was a boy with a higher calling. In the fall of 1968, after graduating from Bishop McDevitt High School in the suburbs of Philadelphia, Lynn arrived at St. Charles Borromeo Seminary, a stately campus whose soaring chapels, somber libraries and marble sculptures with heads bowed in prayer gave off an aura of reverence, history and costly precision. Lynn, a friendly, overweight boy whose acne-scarred face was topped with jet-black hair, was ready to begin his eight-year path to priestly ordination, a process the church calls "formation."

At St. Charles, Lynn was plunged into an environment in which every moment was accounted for. Strict rules governed all aspects of life, especially the personal. Besides the obvious prohibitions on sexual contact – including with oneself, or even in one's imagination – no seminarian was allowed to get too close with his peers, since he was to concentrate on developing bonds with God and the church. Seminary is a form of military-style indoctrination, molding men to think institutionally, not individually. "It's like a brainwashing, almost," says Michael Lynch, who attended St. Charles for nine years but was rejected for priesthood after repeatedly butting heads with his superiors. Lynch recalls a priest barking at his class, "We own you! We own your body, we own your soul!

The goal of priesthood is a lofty one: a man placed on a pedestal for his community to revere, an alter Christus – "another Christ" – who can literally channel the power of Jesus and help create the perfect society intended by God. To model that perfection and elevate themselves above the sinful laity, clergy adopt a vow of celibacy, which has served as a centerpiece of Catholic priesthood since the 12th century. It's a tall order to sculpt chaste, living incarnations of Jesus out of the sloppy clay of your average 18-year-old male. Even many of those who wind up being ordained fail to maintain their chastity: According to a 1990 study by psychologist Richard Sipe, only half of all priests adhere to their vows of celibacy. It is not just the sex-abuse epidemic the church seeks to deny, but sex itself.

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/the-catholic-churchs-secret-sex-crime-files-20110906#ixzz1e1xz3NFm




---------------




PEDOPHILE SEX RING AT PENN STATE?



IS THIS A PEDOPHILE SEX RING



By Jon Rappoport
www.nomorefakenews.com
November 10, 2011.



MarkMadden, a Pennsylvania radio host, wrote a piece about Jerry Sandusky, the accused Penn State pedophile, back in April, while a grand jury was deciding whether to indict Sandusky.



Madden alerted readers that something very nasty might leap out at them soon. Well, now it has. Sandusky has been indicted on 40 counts of child abuse. For years, he was Joe Paterno’s assistant football coach at Penn State.



And Paterno, and the school’s athletic director, and the school president have all been fired, because they were told (in one form or another) about Sandusky raping a young boy in the Penn State locker room shower, and they didn’t make sure the cops knew about it and took action.



Well today. Madden, this radio host, has more to say. He states there is a chance that Sandusky, who has been running a foundation to help young kids, has been pimping some of these kids out to rich Penn State donors.



I was speculating about this to a friend last night. I was also telling him about the mysterious case of Ray Gricar, the local prosecutor who considered filing charges against Sandusky back in 1998, when the first report came in accusing Sandusky of washing two naked boys in a shower. Gricar eventually decided not to prosecute.



No one can ask Gricar about his reasoning now, because he disappeared a few years ago, after leaving his home to do a few routine errands.



Eventually, his car was found. Inside the car was his cell phone. His wallet and keys were gone.



Sometime later, his laptop was found in a river, with the hard drive missing.



Sometime later, the hard drive was found in the river bank, but it was too damaged to collect data from.



Police, at Gricar’s home, examined his desk computer, and discovered that Gricar (or someone) had been doing searches on how to disable a hard drive.

<

Gricar has never been found.



What was so important on the hard drive? Evidence of wider pedophile activity?



Did Gricar commit suicide? Was he murdered?



Jerry Sandusky, the accused pedophile, was once one of the most respected assistant college football coaches in America. When he abruptly retired, in 1999, people were shocked. Equally strange, no college since that time has signed him up to coach.



But since 1999, Sandusky has had access to Penn State football facilities, and was seen there as recently as last week.



Sandusky’s foundation for at-risk kids, The Second Mile, is well known. It has major funding. It’s also, of course, a perfect setting for a pedophile.



Nothing has been proved in court against Sandusky. There could be a trial, there could be a plea bargain.



Yesterday, several sports writers, in the wake of the firings at Penn State, said, “Let the healing begin.” They always do. They always refer to sports programs as “the point of pride” for a big university. As if without that religious component, the whole institution would go down the drain. Well, now they may have to wait for the healing. Because if this latest suggestion about pimping out kids to rich donors is true, football will fade out. The University will crumble, and that’s just for starters.



There will be secret payoffs, certain men will be boarding planes out of the country, various cover-up crimes will be committed. There will be massive stonewalling.



Keep watching. See if this accusation of pimping kids to rich men is dismissed as irresponsible incitement…and vanishes with no follow-up, no investigation.



Jon Rappoport
www.nomorefakenews.com



'via Blog this'