Saturday, June 9, 2012

Creflo Dollar Chokes Under Pressure

Creflo Dollar lacks sense.
Have Ski and Glende studied his growing ministry?


http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/06/creflo_dollar_megachurch_pasto.html


ATLANTA — The 15-year-old daughter of megachurch pastor Creflo Dollar told authorities her father choked and punched her, and hit her with his shoe during an argument over whether she could go to a party, according to a police report.

Dollar's 19-year-old daughter corroborated most of her sister's story, but Dollar disputed it, telling a sheriff's deputy he was trying to restrain her when she became disrespectful. When she began to hit back, he wrestled her to the floor and spanked her, according to the police report.

Dollar is one of the most prominent African-American preachers based around Atlanta. His World Changers Church International has 30,000 members in the Atlanta area, and the ministry has satellite churches across the U.S.

Dollar faces misdemeanor charges of simple battery and cruelty to children. He has been released from jail and his lawyer said he is expected to preach Sunday.

Dollar said in a statement Friday he loved his children and would never hurt them.

Around 1 a.m. Friday, his 15-year-old daughter called 911. She told a Fayette County sheriff's deputy that she and her father argued when he said she couldn't go to a party Saturday night, according to the report.
She went into the kitchen with her older sister. When her father asked why she was crying, she told him, "I do not want to talk right now," the report said.

Her father charged at her, put his hands around her throat, began to punch her and started hitting her with his shoe, she told the deputy. The deputy noted a scratch on her neck.

Dollar told the deputy he wouldn't let his daughter go to the party because of poor grades.


The deputy also interviewed Dollar's 19-year-old daughter, who said her father grabbed the younger girl's shoulders and slapped her in the face and choked her for about five seconds. She said her sister tried to break free, but did not fight back. When her father threw the 15-year-old on the floor, the older girl ran to get her mother.

The deputy also spoke to Dollar's wife, Taffi, who said she did not see the fight.

After interviewing Dollar and the two girls, the deputy asked for written statements. The older daughter initially wrote a statement that contradicted what she had told the deputy and was more in line with what Dollar said. When the deputy confronted her about the discrepancies, she told him it was because her parents were with her. Later, when separated from her parents, she wrote what she initially told him.
The 50-year-old Dollar leads the Creflo Dollar Ministries and is the pastor for World Changers Church International in the Atlanta suburb of College Park. World Changers Church-New York hosts over 6,000 worshippers each week.

Satellite churches are also in Los Angeles, Indianapolis, Washington, Cleveland, Dallas and Houston.
He and his wife, a co-pastor at the church, have five children, according to the church's website.
Dollar is a native of College Park and says he received a vision for World Changers Ministries Christian Center in 1986. He held the first service in front of eight people in an elementary school cafeteria.
His ministry grew quickly and the church moved into its present location, an 8,500-seat sanctuary, on Dec. 24, 1995.

Dollar said in a 2007 interview with The Associated Press that he renounced his church salary, and his income only comes from personal investments, including a real estate residential property business and horse breeding company called Dollar Ranch. He's also published more than 30 books, focusing mostly on family and life issues, including debt management.

He said he also sometimes got up to $100,000 for a single appearance on his packed schedule of speaking engagements.

Along with Bishop Eddie Long, Dollar is one of the most prominent African-American preachers based around Atlanta who have built successful ministries on the prosperity gospel, which teaches that God wants to bless the faithful with earthly riches. Ministers in this tradition often hold up their own wealth as evidence that the teaching works.

Long and Dollar were among six televangelists investigated by Iowa U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley from 2007 to 2010, following questions about personal use of church-owned airplanes, luxury homes and credit cards by megachurch pastors and their families. The report did not find any definitive wrongdoing, but it expressed concern about the lack of financial oversight at such large ministries.

Is Mark Jeske a Descendant of Augie Pieper?




Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Glad You Asked - Simpleman.Errors of Knapp Magnifi...":

If a person claims that faith is synergistic (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/synergism?s=t) if sins are forgiven solely by faith in Christ alone, precluding any forgiveness declared before and without faith, than they are teaching faith is a work of man. And since false teaching Lutheran UOJists believe faith is a work of man they declare that faith is nothing but an empty hand doing nothing but receiving what was already declared to be true before they believed.

Further proof that UOJists are teaching decision theology in their doctrine of Universal forgiveness and by their attack on the Holy Spirit's faith:

WELS MLC President Mark Zarling, "Faith does nothing more than receive the forgiveness which is offered in the Gospel. It is not a condition we fulfill nor is it a cause of forgiveness. We are already forgiven. God's message of justification in Christ is there whether we believe it or not. Faith then receives the blessings." And, "Faith that accepts the good news of universal justification is the work of God the Holy Ghost." Page 7
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/ZarlingJustification.pdf

WELS Our Great Heritage states, "And yet many Lutherans still labor under the delusion that God does not forgive us unless we believe. Instead of seeing faith as nothing more than the spiritual hand with which we make the forgiveness of God our own, they see it as a reason why God forgives us. They believe that Christ has indeed provided forgiveness for all men, that God is willing to forgive them, but before he really forgives he first of all demands that we should be sorry for our sins and that we should have faith. Just have faith they say, and then God will forgive you. All the right words are there. The only thing wrong is that the words are in the wrong order. God does not forgive us IF we have faith. He has forgiven us long ago when he raised his Son from the dead." (p. 59)"

WELS Siegbert W. Becker
"Faith does nothing more than accept the forgiveness proclaimed in the Gospel. It is not a condition we must fulfill before we can be forgiven. It is not a cause of forgiveness on account of which God forgives us. The forgiveness comes first. Faith is merely the response to the message. God says to us, “Your sins are forgiven.” This is objective justification, and God’s message to us is true whether we believe it or not. Faith makes God’s message its own and says, “My sins are forgiven.” This is subjective justification. The whole doctrine is just as simple as that." Page 12, The Place of Faith
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/BeckerJustification.PDF

WELS AZ/CA DP Pastor Jon Buchholz
"Faith doesn’t bring anything into existence that doesn’t already exist. Faith doesn’t cause something to happen. Faith simply grasps— trusts—something that already is in place." Page 14
http://archive.wels.net/cgi-bin/site.pl?2617&collectionID=1161&contentID=76707&shortcutID=26388

August Pieper (as quoted by Holy Trinity Lutheran Church and School and Evergreen Lutheran High School in defense of their teaching of UOJ), third volume of the Quartalschrift , "But whoever molests the doctrine of justification stabs the gospel in the heart ...even if he ever so much emphasizes justification by faith."

I believe he was  a key factor in the Protest'ant split.
Here is an easy to remember WELS formula: Not WELS, then damned.
That applies to the ELS (but not to Sweet, Stetzer, Stanley, Driscoll, Hybels, et al.)
If you question this, you are obviously not WELS or soon to be ejected.
***

GJ - My Icha-widow wants me to hurry up. Luther warned that foul errors creep in when the Means of Grace are denied.


The SynConference is a perfect example. Once F. Pieper got his 1932 Brief Statement turned into canon law, above and beyond the Scriptures and the Confessions, Missouri began to tank.

The ONE dogma uniting the SynConference is justification without faith.

---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Is Mark Jeske a Descendant of Augie Pieper?":

Ichabod -

UOJ (universal objective justification) enthusiasts diminish Scripture's teaching about "justification by faith" with their all encompassing declarations of humanity's blanket forgiveness based upon Christ's sacrifice for human sin. They are so myopic in their view that they fail to give the Holy Spirit his divine due. Hence, they ignore the importance of personal faith and belief. I quote from my [this] week's "The Christian Message" topical message:

.........Sinner – Do not think that you will escape God’s just judgment upon your sorry soul. In your unrepentant state without saving faith, you, in your damning unbelief, are like the faithless wealthy church goers, who will share your same eternal everlasting torment death fate. Your eternal death doom will be exacted upon you for the same reason it will be for those whose church going did not make a difference to the Triune God who expects personal faith to be present with the hearing of His Scripture Word. The Scripture teaches that God’s Word can be present, - and, even “heard” by those in Christian worship circles, - but if it isn’t met with faith, it is useless for one’s eternal welfare:

"For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it." - Hebrews 4:2

May I add here, that American churches are plenteous with false preaching and teaching about Christ’s sacrifice on the Cross. As one person commented, on a Christian website, that false gospel is, a "Universal Forgiveness before and without faith."............

"Why Reliance Upon Human Wealth Is So Spiritually Damning"

http://www.thechristianmessage.org/2012/06/why-reliance-upon-human-wealth-is-so.html

I think that it was Brett Meyer who coined those six words of  "Universal Forgiveness before and without faith," on this very own Ichabod website.

Nathan M. Bickel - emeritus pastor

http://www.thechristianmessage.org/

Should I Stop Teaching the Non-Lutherans in the Synodical Conference?

Jack Cascione quoted this with approval, as Robert Preus once did, to prove to everyone that Preus taught UOJ.
My point was clear - Preus once taught UOJ but rejected the dogma in Justification and Rome.

Two things are clear:

  1. The LCMS, WELS, and ELS will continue to make justification without faith their central dogma. 
  2. They will tell any lie to disguise what they really believe, teach, and confess.
The Appleton plagiarists are terribly offended that I teach non-Lutherans in graduate school - actually at two different graduate schools. I have taught world religion over 60 times - to Mormons, Catholics, and "an ordained pagan Egyptian priestess."

The so-called Lutherans could have hired me to teach in their institutions of higher education. I am more qualified than most of their faculties. That is the beauty of the parochial system - someone with the right family connections can be hired to teach at a college or seminary, without any credentials. The current ELS pope, John Moldstad, was hired to teach New Testament without having a bachelor's degree. Larry Olson calls himself "Dr." by virtue of a drive-by D.Min. from Fuller Seminary. Jay Webber was "rector" of the Marvin Schwan UOJ Gospel Lighthouse. Roger Kovaciny, who claimed to be a founder of Church Growth in WELS, served on the faculty, as the Floyd Stolzenburg Professor of Church Growth.

Not one of these men is qualified to teach as an adjunct professor anywhere else but their little parochial schools.

Tim Glende argued that he was infallible by virtue of his EIGHT STRAIGHT YEARS OF EDUCATION, when he was in the process of excommunicating Rick Techlin. Did I mention - TIM STUDIED GREEK!

The solution to the Appleton offense would be to hire me to teach at Martin Luther College, Bethany College, The Sausage Factory, or The Little Schoolhouse on the Prairie. Why didn't they? John Brenner had to take a year of remedial education before he could be admitted to the UW graduate program - after he was hired to teach at Mequon. Brug has a doctorate in Hebrew, so they gave him the yellowed lecture notes of J. P. Meyer and made him dogmatics professor too. That would never happen at an accredited school, where people have to be formally trained in the discipline they teach.

Apart from studying at Fuller Seminary, Bivens and Valleskey had no other education beyond their seminary program. The same could be said for many of the pivotal positions in the WELS and ELS. The most unifying educational factor in the WELS, ELS, and LCMS is study at Fuller Seminary. That is also the best way to get promoted.

Infallible synod popes - Harrison, Schroeder, Moldstad.
Justification by faith offends them.


Lutheran Doctrine Professor, Synodical Conference
My role is to teach the non-Lutherans of the Synodical Conference, a much bigger challenge than teaching Lutheran doctrine at online universities, where the students respect the professors. They thank me for posting Gerhardt hymns, for quoting Luther, for emphasizing the efficacy of the Word.

Lutherans need to admit to themselves that SP Harrison, SP Schroeder, and SP Moldstad are not Lutheran. All three men reject justification by faith, no matter what they protest to cover their tracks. They have no concept of the efficacy of the Word, so they do not trust God's Word to accomplish His will - contrary to Isaiah 55 and many other passages.

Harrison, Schroeder, and Moldstad are unable to teach the Means of Grace, although they may toy with the words from time to time. So does the real Pope in Rome. Roman Catholics teach the Means of Grace, but read the fine print. The three Synod Popes are just bad imitations of Holy Father Antichrist. They are the little Antichrists of Scripture, aiding and abetting, small potatoes.

Discipline for Harrison, Schroeder, and Moldstad does not mean condemning impenitent sinners and false teachers, but condemning and expelling those who question their infallibility.

What did Harrison do when it was proven that LCMS District Presidents put a known sex offender into the pastoral office and kept him there to rape again? Harrison silenced his robotic followers - and they fell into stupefied silence, content to let more sex offenders have their way in the ministerial office. Will Harrson back the lawsuit of the Pennsylvania victim of child abuse? The man has an eye-witness who saw it happen, but that witness is a famous professor. Missouri's policy is to destroy evidence, as the lawsuit points out.

Will Missouri, WELS, and the ELS give back their Marvin Schwan indulgence commissions, since they know the truth about his "Scriptural divorce"? No, their hands are stretched out for more.

Short version - make up whatever you want, because the Confessions approve!


---


The charge of being anti-Christian and specifically the charge of being an Antichrist made to those who act contrary to Christ while declaring they do it by his authority is very serious.  I agree with Pastor Jackson that the title of Antichrist not only applies to the anti-Christian Pope but also to those in the Lutheran Synods who declare the false gospel of Universal Objective Justification, UOJ (aka: Objective Justification or General Justification).  There cannot be a more heinous crime in the church than to pervert the central and chief article of Christian faith – the doctrine by which a person, if faithfully believed, instantaneously receives Christ’s righteousness for the forgiveness of all sin (which is justification), is adopted as God’s child and is saved eternally.  This same doctrine if believed and confessed contrary to Scripture separates a person from Christ and thereby remains under God’s wrath and condemnation over sin, and does not obtain Christ as Mediator through faith alone.  All doctrine, churches, denominations and people stand or fall by their confession of this chief and central Christian doctrine.  Uncorrected errors in doctrine and practice are a fruit of confessing trust in the false gospel of UOJ.  Defense of false doctrine and practice is an absence of the Holy Spirit in those who reject His faith, worked solely through the Means of Grace, which clings to Christ alone for the forgiveness of sins and salvation.  Apathy concerning the outward expressions of false doctrine and practice is a significant trait of laity who, having been fed putrid doctrines taught by false teachers, are exchanging their Baptismal faith in Christ for the false comfort of group think, Synod worship and the theology of glory.  Fortunately, the defense of false doctrine and practice by the equally false teachers in the Lutheran Synods comes at a price.  They are incorrigibly contradictory in their speech concerning the Word of God.  It is the Holy Spirit alone who works faithfulness and clarity of thought and speech in faithful Christians.  Having rejected the Holy Spirit’s faith, UOJists lack the guidance of the Holy Spirit and instead become puppets for their father below and are unable to remain consistent and faithful to Scripture and the Christian Lutheran Confessions.  Below I quote from the Confessions that the forgiveness of sins is only declared and imputed to those with faith in Christ alone.  The (W)ELS quotes show the depth of Scriptural depravity that the Lutheran Synods have traveled in their journey into apostasy.

“10] These treasures are offered us by the Holy Ghost in the promise of the holy Gospel; and faith alone is the only means by which we lay hold upon, accept, and apply, and appropriate them to ourselves. 11] This faith is a gift of God, by which we truly learn to know Christ, our Redeemer, in the Word of the Gospel, and trust in Him, that for the sake of His obedience alone we have the forgiveness of sins by grace, are regarded as godly and righteous by God the father, and are eternally saved. 12] Therefore it is considered and understood to be the same thing when Paul says that we are justified by faith, Rom. 3, 28, or that faith is counted to us for righteousness, Rom. 4, 5, and when he says that we are made righteous by the obedience of One, Rom. 5, 19, or that by the righteousness of One justification of faith came to all men, Rom. 5, 18. 13] For faith justifies, not for this cause and reason that it is so good a work and so fair a virtue, but because it lays hold of and accepts the merit of Christ in the promise of the holy Gospel; for this must be applied and appropriated to us by faith, if we are to be justified thereby. 14] Therefore the righteousness which is imputed to faith or to the believer out of pure grace is the obedience, suffering, and resurrection of Christ, since He has made satisfaction for us to the Law, and paid for [expiated] our sins. 15] For since Christ is not man alone, but God and man in one undivided person, He was as little subject to the Law, because He is the Lord of the Law, as He had to suffer and die as far as His person is concerned. For this reason, then, His obedience, not only in suffering and dying, but also in this, that He in our stead was voluntarily made under the Law, and fulfilled it by this obedience, is imputed to us for righteousness, so that, on account of this complete obedience, which He rendered His heavenly Father for
us, by doing and suffering, in living and dying, God forgives our sins, regards us as godly and righteous, and eternally saves us. 16] This righteousness is offered us by the Holy Ghost through the Gospel and in the Sacraments,<b> and is applied, appropriated, and received through faith</b>, whence believers have reconciliation with God, forgiveness of sins, the grace of God sonship, and heirship of eternal life. 17] Accordingly, the word justify here means to declare righteous and free from sins, and to absolve one from eternal punishment for the sake of Christ's righteousness, which is imputed by God to faith, Phil. 3, 9. For this use and understanding of this word is common in the Holy Scriptures of the Old and the New Testament. Prov. 17, 15: He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the Lord. Is. 5, 23: Woe unto them which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him! Rom. 8, 33: Who shall lay anything to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth, that is, absolves from sins and acquits.”
http://www.bookofconcord.org/sd-righteousness.php

AAC That We Obtain The Remission of Sins By Faith Alone In Christ, "80] The wrath of God cannot be appeased if we set against it our own works, because Christ has been set forth as a Propitiator, so that, for his sake, the Father may become reconciled to us. But Christ is not apprehended as a Mediator except by faith. Therefore, by faith alone we obtain remission of sins when we comfort our hearts with confidence in the mercy promised for Christ's sake."

The following are self indicting statements from (W)ELS District President Jon Buchholz given and approved at the 2005 WELS Convention.  Note how they declare a doctrine contrary to the Christian Confessions and are immediately contradict what was previously stated.

Buchholz, “In each example, the mark of heresy is to go as far as Scripture goes—and then to go one step further”.  P.7

"God has forgiven the whole world. God has forgiven everyone his sins." This statement is absolutely true! This is the heart of the gospel, and it must be preached and taught as the foundation of our faith. <b>But here’s where the caveat comes in: In Scripture, the word "forgive" is used almost exclusively in a personal, not a universal sense. The Bible doesn’t make the statement, "God has forgiven the world</b>."  p. 7

"God has forgiven all sins, but the unbeliever rejects God’s forgiveness." Again, this statement is true—and Luther employed similar terminology to press the point of Christ’s completed work of salvation.16 <b>But we must also recognize that Scripture doesn’t speak this way</b>."  p.8

"God has declared the entire world righteous." This statement is true, as we understand it to mean that God has rendered a verdict of "not-guilty" toward the entire world. It is also true—and must be taught—that the righteousness of Christ now stands in place of the world’s sin; this is the whole point of what Jesus did for us at Calvary. <b>However, once again we’re wresting a term out of its usual context. In Scripture the term "righteous" usually refers to believers</b>. "  p. 9
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/BuchholzJustification.pdf

And in his June 2012 Emmanuel Church newsletter he makes this statement, “Our unity centers in our connection to Jesus Christ, our one Savior.  We are united by complete agreement in our teaching.  We are united in God’s Word and in complete agreement with everything it says. We hold unswervingly to God’s teaching in the Holy Bible as the only reliable, unchanging source of truth.  We do not wish to depart one iota from what God says.

(W)ELS quotes promoting UOJ in Mark Zarling’s paper, Stand in Awe of Justification. (former WELS MLC president)
“the glorious Gospel: In Jesus, God has declared the entire world righteous and forgiven, irregardless of whether or not the world believes it. Such is the jewel described by objective, universal, or general justification.” Page 2

Quoting Permit Stoeckhardt, “If God has already in Christ justified all men and forgiven their sins, then I also in Christ have a gracious God and the forgiveness of all my sins.” Page 5 “Irregardless of man's faith, God declares the world just.” Page 6

“Our salvation is an accomplished fact. It is done. It is finished. The resurrection is the proof that God has declared the sinners justified!” Page 6

“Faith does nothing more than receive the forgiveness which is offered in the Gospel. It is not a condition we fulfill nor is it a cause of forgiveness. We are already forgiven.” Page 7

“Simply present Law and Gospel. Warn sinners that unbelief damns, and rejection of Christ will bring eternal torment. Then comfort them with the glorious objective reality that all sins are already forgiven in Christ.” Page 7
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/ZarlingJustification.pdf


---


From Pastor Nathan Bickel:



Dr. Jackson,


Count it God's blessing that you were never asked or called to teach higher education in Lutheran synodical schools. [Else if it had turned out for you, as such, Lutheran UOJ (universal objective justification) inbreeding may have taken its toll upon you, also] 


The good Lord apparently had other plans for you, - that being, teaching heathen and non-Lutherans. Despised in Lutheran circles as you must be, should be no shame [for you]. Rather, it is the mark of the suffering Christ. Did He not say:


"Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets." - Luke 6:26


Dr. Jackson - be content with the prophetic ministry the Lord has apparently laid upon your Arkansas backwoods [often rejected] lap......


Nathan M. Bickel - pastor emeritus


www.thechrisitanmessage.org


www.moralmatters.org


DP Engelbrecht on Plagiarism « Light from Light

The District Pope is never wrong.


DP Engelbrecht on Plagiarism « Light from Light:


Last Fall, District President Engelbrecht presented a paper entitled “A Clarion Call” to be faithful to the word and tenor of the gospel.  He presented this paper at a WELS pastors’ conference in Autumn 2011.  This “clarion call” was subtitled: “A Presentation And Discussion Of Various Concerns That Have Been Raised Recently In Our Midst.”

One issue dealt with in this paper was plagiarism.  The District President dealt with this issue because there were complaints about pastors in the Northern Wisconsin District plagiarizing the sermons and words of false teachers, and passing them off as their own.

In defining plagiarism, the District President relied heavily on Wikipedia.  However, Wikipedia is an online collaborative free encyclopedia.  In other words, anyone with internet access can change or alter Wikipedia.  That is why no reputable paper should authoritatively cite Wikipedia.

Sadly, the District President’s reliance upon Wikipedia in framing the issue of plagiarism resulted in numerous problems.  The first problem is that after the District President presented his paper, someone (not me or anyone known by me) changed Wikipedia’s definition of plagiarism.  At the time of this writing, it no longer agrees with the previous definition, the one cited by District President Engelbrecht.

The second problem is that a section of District President Engelbrecht’s citation appears to have been itself plagiarized from plagiarism.org.  (http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_what_is_plagiarism.html).  It is ironic that in attempting to teach others about plagiarism, the District President inadvertently included plagiarization in his own paper.  This is not to say that District President Engelbrecht intentionally deceived the pastors of his district.  Putting the best construction on this he is just sloppy and unprofessional.

The best construction is that the District President was aggressively sloppy.  This is because he had a well written definition of the issues of plagiarism that had been given to him by an attorney, but that professional information apparently did not suit the District President.  So instead, he scraped together a half-plagiarized definition from Wikipedia.

Quoting from Wikipedia.com, District President Engelbrecht said: “‘In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud.  It involves both stealing someone else’s work and lying about it afterward.’”  Then District President Engelbrecht immediately came to the conclusion that by “definition, then, using someone else’s material with their permission would not be considered plagiarism per se.”  (Page 2.  Emphasis altered).

However, if the District President had gone to the original source, plagiarism.org (a source that I cited in my November 2009 and January 2011 letters), then he could have read that sentence in its original context.  There he would have seen on the same page it also says:

All of the following are considered plagiarism:

•    turning in someone else’s work as your own
•    copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
•    failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
•    giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
•    changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
•    copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on “fair use” rules)

The District President continues to confuse copyright theft with plagiarism.  In Pastor Glende’s case, he was accused of plagiarism, which is deceit.  He was not accused of copyright theft.  When the issue of plagiarism was presented to the District Presidium, the differences between copyright infringement and plagiarism were clearly presented.  Here is an extended excerpt from the letter sent to the District President in November 2009:

According to plagiarism.org:

“plagiarism is the use of another’s original words or ideas as though they were your own.  Any time you borrow from an original source and do not give proper credit, you have committed plagiarism . . .”  (Plagiarism FAQs).

Plagiarism usually involves two parts:  First, there is a copyright theft from the original author.  Second, there is a fraud as the plagiarist passes off the other’s work as his own.  However, plagiarism does not necessarily involve copyright theft.  For example, if a student purchases a term paper and hands it in as his own; that is obviously not a theft, however it is still a fraud.  Copyright theft and plagiarism are not the same crime.  Copyright theft is a violation against the author, while plagiarism is essentially a fraud perpetrated against the audience.

In the case of the purchased term paper, it is of no significance to the professor that the student has the original author’s permission to plagiarize.  A man who sells term papers cannot authorize students to deceive professors.  Likewise, a man who gives away sermons cannot authorize other pastors to deceive their congregations.

Just as a journalist is hired by a news organization to write news reports, and is expected to write his own news reports; so also Pastor Glende has been called by our congregation to write pure gospel sermons, and is expected to write his own sermons.  Does the seminary accept plagiarized sermons from its students?  If not, then why should a congregation?

(Footnotes omitted).

That letter provided ample evidence of plagiarism both in the form of documented facts and applicable law.  Was there something wrong with that standard definition of plagiarism?  If not, then why did the District President undertake to redefine what is and is not plagiarism?  Why did the District President not even acknowledge the above definition in his so-called presentation of the concerns that were brought to the Presidium?

According to District President Engelbrecht’s twisted definition, a student who purchased a term paper, and handed it in as his own would not be guilty of “plagiarism” because he would have had the permission of the original author.  Yet, that is the very definition of plagiarism.

The District President has finally come out against “deception” and “plagiarism,” and that is good.  The District President has finally agreed that in theory “plagiarism” is wrong and pastors should not deceive while preaching.  This is some progress.  However, why did it take over a year to get this admission?  And why in the process did he redefine the meaning of plagiarism to mean it is not “plagiarism” if the original author gives permission to plagiarize?

The result of the District President’s twisted redefinition of “plagiarism” is that Pastor Glende gets to claim he is not guilty of plagiarism because the District Presidium says so.  And the men of the District Presidium get to maintain publically that they have dealt appropriately with the issue, when they have not.  Plagiarism is a fraud and a deceptive sin, and it becomes a doctrinal issue for the Church when the words of false teachers are used in this deception.  There are pastors in the WELS who have engaged in and/or defended this sin, and they are unrepentant.

In March 2011, the pastors of St. Peter Congregation and the District Presidium met with some concerned area pastors and laymen for the purpose of resolving this issue among others.  However, instead of seeking to resolve the issues in good faith, they secretly planned to terminate fellowship with the layman who pointed out the truth and who was seated across the table from them.  (That deceitful ambush termination of fellowship was finalized approximately two weeks after the above mentioned meeting).  So instead of repenting the sin of plagiarism, they redefined sin, and rent the Body of Christ.

The District President said in his “clarion call”:

Over the past couple of years a number of issues and concerns have been brought before the District Presidium by various individuals, involving doctrine, practice, and approaches to ministry.  Some of them were cleared up immediately, some were the result of misunderstandings and miscommunication and were resolved through extensive discussion, some fall under the category of legitimate differences of opinion on approaches to ministry, and some called for continued evangelical warnings to the brethren to help them avoid straying from the Word, the Lutheran Confessions, and the tenor of the gospel.  It must be stated that at no point in time did the District Presidium find false doctrine being espoused or promoted by anyone.

This gives the impression that everything has been resolved.  However, I am not aware of any issue being resolved.  For example, how can the issue of plagiarism be resolved when the pastors involved are unrepentant, and have gone so far as to terminate fellowship with those who pointed out the truth?

There needs to be repentance.  Sin is real.  Sin is not like a thought that can evaporate if we cover it up.  Hiding the truth does not cure sin.  Sin is like a malignant cancer, and it will continue to rot until it is cleansed by Christ.  The District President cannot cure sin or cancer by twisting words and making up his own language.  Cancer is cancer.  Sin is sin.  If sin is not cleansed, the result is spiritual death.  (Romans 6:23).  Thus, there needs to be repentance.

Repentance and forgiveness is easy.  There have been so many opportunities to say, “Hey, we screwed up.  How can we fix this together as brothers?”  That would have been so easy.  So easy.  The debt of sin has been paid.  (John 1:29).  Repentance and forgiveness is as easy as drawing a breath and exhaling.  Why cannot we tread this beautiful path together?  Unfortunately, that question points to a deeper theological problem in this district: the teaching that Christians can choose to believe.  Can the dry bones of Israel live and breath?  God alone knows.  (Ezekiel 37:3).  Repentance consists of contrition and faith, and like life itself, faith is 100% the gift of God.  (Ephesians 2:8, Acts 11:18; Apology Augsburg Confession, Art. XII Repentance).

Kyrie eleison.


'via Blog this'

***

GJ - UOJ is plagiarized from Rambach and Knapp, Pietists. One cannot build on a foundation of cardboard.

Glad You Asked - Simpleman.
Errors of Knapp Magnified by the Current Crop of Enthusiasts



Simpleman Jones has left a new comment on your post "The Rock Is Justification by Faith - Not Justifica...":

What is the problem with the Knapp quote? Isn't he saying the same thing you say, only he uses the phrase "objective justification"?

***

GJ - I have answered this before, in Luther versus the UOJ Pietists, and various posts.

The Woods/Knapp Error, Part I
The most basic problem is the distortion of the Biblical word "justification." That word means "a declaration of innocence." Woods, a Calvinist, interpreted Knapp (a Halle Pietist) as saying - the entire world has been given a universal declaration of forgiveness.

A Lutheran could misinterpret this Woods explanation as saying that God has redeemed the world through Christ. The key difference is justification, which is where the UOJ Enthusiasts start howling. Woods and Knapp merge the atonement with justification, making the death of Christ the absolution of the world.

That error is leveraged by Woods using the term pardon: justification is pardon in his lexicon.

To clarify, the Scriptures teach that the atonement is universal, because Christ paid the price for all sins for all mankind. That point is not disputed, although the UOJ Stormtroopers always want to confuse the issue with false charges.

The Woods/Knapp Error, Part II
The Word of God is utterly consistent. The Scriptures are in perfect harmony, all parts agreeing with each other.

Therefore, an error about the atonement will necessarily lead to many other errors. The language makes me grind my aging molars - "an act of man." Do Lutherans want to plant their banner there? An act of man means making a decision for Christ. God offers a transaction, which man completes - the classic definition of synergism.

And it is worse yet - "he accepts the pardon freely offered," leaving no doubt that this gives man the glory for  doing the right thing.

Missing from Woods/Knapp and UOJ, Part III
The silence is as important as the errors. Woods and Knapp are silent about the Means of Grace.

Everyone wants to associate grace with forgiveness, and that is good. This quotation dis-associates (hyphen in the original manuscript) grace from the Word, grace from the Means of Grace.

How exactly did God pardon all of mankind from Adam to Zelda? How can it be, that the Holy Spirit always works through the Word, except in absolving all people of sin, so they are born forgiven, as E. Preuss claimed?

The Scriptures teach, as the Book of Concord witnesses, that Christ earned forgiveness through His atoning death, that this grace is distributed by the Holy Spirit through the Instruments of Grace, the Word and Sacraments.  The power of the Gospel imparts and sustains faith, so forgiveness is received through that faith  that the Promises give.

Medium Rare observed that Knapp and UOJ are prime examples of blaspheming the Holy Spirit. The first part of the blasphemy is attributing absolution to mankind without the work of the Holy Spirit. This great miracle just happens, even though the Word of God failed to record it. The second part of this blasphemy is giving man credit for saving himself, by making a decision for Christ. Look in your NIV Bible for "the sinner's prayer."

I am not going to say what Calvin always taught, because he contradicted himself, just as Spener did in his own voluminous works. Both were tireless workers, so their efforts spread everywhere. One can read Zwingli (hard to find) but Calvin's commentaries are everywhere, including Lutheran pastors' offices (sorry to report). Spener's cell groups are everywhere, especially the SynConference today. In contrast, Luther always taught the efficacy of the Word in the Means of Grace.

Spener was the first union theologian, merging Calvin's doctrine with Lutheran teaching. Halle University was established to teach Pietism. The true founder of Missouri, Bishop Martin Stephan, studied at Halle and imparted his version of justification to C. F. W. Walther.

Walther adopted the Rambach spin on UOJ, an emphasis on Easter absolution rather than Good Friday absolution. The Stormtroopers have never resolved this contradiction.

Walther was not a great theologian. He graduated from a rationalistic university with a four-year degree. His "conservative" training consisted of attending a Philobiblicum (Halle Pietism) cell group, following a fierce and demanding Pietist, and finally submitting to Stephan's cell group leadership.

Both of Walther's Pietistic mentors demanded absolute submission to their authority, as Zion on the Mississippi records with meticulous detail. When Stephan was caught giving syphilis to the young women in his group, Walther took over the authority of the bishop, after organizing the mob, robbing Stephan, and leaving him to die on the Illinois side of the Mississippi River.

One can trace the habit of UOJ deception with the Mormon-like tales of the Great Walther leading a confused and bewildered group out of the wilderness. Walther took over the congregation his brother founded and took over the episcopate that Stephan established. The LCMS histories still claim that Walther and his good buddy were "shocked" to discover Stephan's adultery.

But Stephan left his wife and family (except his healthy son) in Europe, came across with his mistress and groupies, and lived in open sin in St. Louis. Everyone knew he was an adulterer, so the shocking confession story had to be pedaled later to explain the violence and venom of the mob that Walther brought down to Perryville. No one wanted to admit how many women caught syphilis from their bishop. His children and wife were dying from the dread disease in Europe.

Walther explained (privately) that Stephan's adultery was the fault of his wife. And Marvin Schwan had a "Scriptural divorce." Remember that, folks, whenever you see a gushing reference to St. Marvin in the LCMS, ELS, and WELS. Marvin's wife, the mother of his children, is blamed in the same way. Remember her anguish when she killed herself, whenever you use a Marvin Schwan building or retreat center.

That is the ultimate damage of Knapp's UOJ. False doctrine hardens the heart and makes deception and slander necessary in maintaining the Pietistic illusion of sanctity.

---

AC V has left a new comment on your post "The Rock Is Justification by Faith - Not Justifica...":

Simpleman Jones,

The error that jumps out at me about Knapp's quote is that he makes faith an act of man. That's what happens when you use the terms "Objective Justification" and "Subjective Justification." Are there two Justifications?

Faith is an act of God. It is every bit as "objective" as God's mercy, Christ's merit, and the gospel which proclaims it. Knapp should have refreshed his memory of the Formula of Concord III:25 "The Righteousness of Faith":

"...the article of justification, in and to which belong and are necessary only the grace of God, the merit of Christ, and faith, which receives this in the promise of the Gospel, whereby the righteousness of Christ is imputed to us, whence we receive and have forgiveness of sins, reconciliation with God, sonship, and heirship of eternal life.