Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Midweek Advent Service. December 12, 2012



Advent, December 12, 2012

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Mid-Week Advent,  Wednesday, 7 PM Central

The Hymn #81   Gerhardt         Thy Manger Is            3.60
The Order of Vespers                                             p. 41
The Psalmody            Psalm 100                             p. 144
The First Lection                      
The Second Lection           
 The Sermon Hymn #90  Gerhardt   Come Your Hearts 3.83

The Word Brings Christ To Us

The Prayers and Lord’s Prayer                         p. 44
The Collect for Peace                                           p. 45
The Benediction                                                   p. 45
The Hymn # 93        O Lord We Welcome    3.40

KJV John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. 6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. 7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. 8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. 9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. 10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. 11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not. 12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. 15 John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. 16 And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. 17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. 18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

 

The Word Brings Christ To Us


KJV John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

This Logos Hymn teaches us about Christ and also about the Holy Trinity. Jesus is the Creating Word, there at the beginning. And yet, we have the Word used three times in the same verse – typical of Trinitarian references. When God is revealed to us in the Word, we often find groups of three. This verse shows us the Unity of the Three Persons and the Three-ness of God. And yet, the Son of God as the Logos (the Word) is emphasized.

The Gospel of John begins with the same words as Genesis, the only book of the Bible to do this.

As Luther taught, the Word brings Christ to us as the Gospel proclamation. This is the One who died for our sins. The Holy Spirit teaches us about the Father/Son relationship especially in the Gospel of John, in the words of Jesus Himself. Simply describing that means naming the Persons of the Trinity.

The Word brings Christ to us, which means the Holy Spirit creates and sustains faith in us through that Gospel of Christ. Through that faith we receive forgiveness of sins and the promise of eternal life.

2 The same was in the beginning with God.

The text could be translated – That Same Word. It is an emphatic statement, used when there is a possibility of confusion. It creates absolute clarity.

You could ask, “Who was in the beginning with God”?

The answer is  - “He was. Jesus the Son of God, the Word.”

3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

Not enough can be said about this in a large book. Every single aspect of “nature” of Creation is from the Creating Word, the Son of God. The hymnal you hold in your hand. The gold in the wedding ring. The diamond. The chemicals that make up your body and the give life to your loved ones. Wood, stone, metal, air – every single element came from the Son of God, the Lord of Creation.

The Lutherans grasp this best in their hymns, especially in Gerhardt. Jesus was enclosed in the stone cave, the very stone He created and could destroy with one Word.

4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

Wherever the Word is, there springs eternal life. This is not just biological life, but eternal life. How could ordinary life be the light of men? This can only mean another expression of the Gospel.

As you recall from many repetitions, God created light before the sun and stars. In other words, truth existed before the sources of created light. Those lights are subordinate to the Light of Men – the Son of God. He is truth, as He said, “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life.”



5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

This truth illuminates the darkness, but the darkness (evil) cannot grasp or extinguish it. These two must exist until the end – light and darkness, good and evil, those who believe and those who do not.

6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. 7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. 8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.

This is a type of side-bar, to show people that John the Baptist was famous as a prophet, but sent by God to prepare people for the Messiah. These three verses are more like prose in the midst of poetry.

9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.

Here emphasis is used again, to distinguish between Jesus as the Son of God and John as the prophet going before Him. This contrast makes it clear – that John was the promised prophet, Jesus the promised Messiah and Savior.

10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. 11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.

This is the cross. From the lofty verses of the Creation we come to the rejection of His mission and message of forgiveness. They did not believe. His own people, His own creation, did not receive Him.

Notice the parallel – receive and believe. This is what many miss. Some turn faith into “making a decision” which is not the same as “receiving.”
Some Lutherans do not like the word “faith” and teach against it, as if faith means something other than “receive.”

Jesus comes to us in the Gospel Word – and we receive it. We hear it with sincerity and trust in its truth – because we know and experience that the Gospel is truth itself, light and life.

12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

Here faith is clearly the parallel term, the synonym for “receive.” As many as believed in Him. If there is doubt, read John 16:8ff – the Holy Spirit convicts the world of sin, because they do not believe on Him.

This is the Gospel – saving faith – that trust which receives the promises and blessings of God.

For that reason, the next segment is a great doxology – praise of God and glory in Christ who comes to us in the Word.

14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. 15 John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. 16 And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. 17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. 18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.


Comments from 29A and Brett Meyer


In a recent communication, 29A pointed out that the avalanche of Biblical translations is having the effect of destroying Biblical doctrine.

I thought that was an astute observation. WELS will adopt and sell the New NIV precisely for that reason. UOJ does not stand up to the plain Word of God, in Greek or English, so the NNIV paraphrase serves a useful purpose in providing the dogma that the mainline denominations want.

Biblical inerrancy is not much of a stance when defending the NNIV, joining with the most Leftist denominations of the National Council of Churches.

Missouri is no better, since their beloved ESV is more accurately called the Calvinist edition of the RSV, which is owned by the...National Council of Churches.

That follows the modern political trickery of providing a safe alternative in the same orbit as the one that must be shunned. Thus RomneyCare versus ObamaCare, Global Warming McCain versus Global Warming Obama; Yale Skull and Bones Bush versus Yale Skull and Bones Kerry.

http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2012/12/how-does-one-interpret-language-in-post.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+IntrepidLutherans+%28Intrepid+Lutherans%29

As reported several times before, the NNIV philosophy comes from an apostate. One advisor was a lesbian, etc.

---

Typical UOJ fanatic.



Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Step Up for a Liter of WELS Kool-Aid":

We see this today in those who openly reject universal forgiveness in Christ. Such people may think they are evangelical and confessional and genuinely Lutheran, but in every case I have seen, they confuse law and gospel in the most wretched way, and most sadly, they deny the fullness, the freedom and the completeness of the gospel. They are unwilling to say in an unqualified and unconditional way, "God has forgiven your sins in Christ! God canceled your debt in Christ!" They speak of the necessity of repentance and the righteousness of faith and the importance of faith and the confessional doctrine of justification by faith—and we deny none of these things!— but finally their aberrant spirit is revealed when it becomes obvious that their “gospel” is qualified and conditional and loaded with “ifs.” They offer potential forgiveness as an unfulfilled promise until the conditions of repentance and faith are met. It is a wrong, legal focus that is more about the individual than it is about the object. Confusion of law and gospel and a preponderance of law expose the sinister, diabolical agenda that robs God of glory and deprives sinners of certain comfort in Christ.
Page 30
http://azcadistrict.com/sites/default/files/papers/Buchholz_2012-10.pdf

This UOJ quote is from (W)ELS DP Pastor Jon Buchholz’ most recent defense of Universal Justification and his excommunication of Pastor Paul Rydecki for teaching Justification by Faith Alone. It is similar to the false statement quoted by (W)ELS Evergreen Lutheran High School in defense of their attack on Justification by Faith Alone written in the WELS Our Great Heritage, “And yet many Lutherans still labor under the delusion that God does not forgive us unless we believe. Instead of seeing faith as nothing more than the spiritual hand with which we make the forgiveness of God our own, they see it as a reason why God forgives us. They believe that Christ has indeed provided forgiveness for all men, that God is willing to forgive them, but before he really forgives he first of all demands that we should be sorry for our sins and that we should have faith. Just have faith they say, and then God will forgive you. All the right words are there. The only thing wrong is that the words are in the wrong order. God does not forgive us IF we have faith. He has forgiven us long ago when he raised his Son from the dead." (p. 59)
"If forgiveness were dependent on faith in the sense that God does not forgive until we believe, we would always have to be sure that we are believers before we would be sure that we are forgiven." (p.60)
Vol. 3

Buchholz is defending the shame of the (W)ELS perversion of the chief and central article of Christ’s doctrine – Justification. If UOJ teaches contrary to Scripture in just one point it is a false doctrine. In fact, it fails in all points and has been clearly shown to be a false gospel, a new and false way of righteousness before God, which perverts the work of Christ, the declarations of God the Father, the righteousness of the Holy Spirit’s faith and the Means of Grace.

Compare the UOJ statements above to Christ’s clear Scripture in John 3:18, “He that believeth on him his not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.” And John 3:36, “He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.”

Buchholz, Webber, Schroeder and the rest are leading the Lutheran Synods away from Scripture and the faithful Lutheran Confessions and into the New Age religion by teaching Universal Objective Justification and that there are multiple realities with God. Little surprise then that they are working with Thrivent Financial for Lutherans to sponsor and support the United Religions Initiative (URI) which is a NGO of the United Nations and the religious arm of the New World Order.


VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - CHARLESTON, SC: Parishes are free to choose their own future, says bishop.
"It Cannot Happen Here," Schroeder and Harrison Hope and Pray

VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - CHARLESTON, SC: Parishes are free to choose their own future, says bishop:


The Bishop of South Carolina, Mark Lawrence told the majority of his clergy and parishes that they have been set free to go wherever they want ecclesiastically. He has made no decision as to what he and those who follow him will do.

Those who stay are free to opt out and free to decide their future, he said. The diocese, under Lawrence, still retains the name and legal seal of the Diocese of South Carolina. It will continue under that name and seal even though it is no longer a diocese of The Episcopal Church.

"Those who are not with us, you may go in peace; your properties intact. Those who have yet to decide we give you what time you need. Persuasion is almost always the preferable policy, not coercion. By God's grace we will bear you no ill," he told his diocese. Earlier in the year Lawrence issued a 'quit claim' to parishes allowing them disaffiliate from the diocese and choose their own ecclesiastical authority.

"We have many friends among the bishops, priests and laity of TEC, and we wish you well. Furthermore, I bear no ill toward the Episcopal Church. She has been the incubator for an Anglican Christianity where God placed me many years ago." He described his differences with the Episcopal Church as a 'lover's quarrel.'

"To all who will continue with us: 'Let us rend our hearts and not our garments.' Let us be careful not to poison the waters of our communities with our differences with TEC. We shall move on."

Lawrence said that having moved on the Standing Committee's resolution of disassociation, disassociation has been accomplished legally and canonically. "The resolutions before you this day are affirmations of that fact. You have only to decide if that is your will and your emotions will follow."

Canon lawyer Ross "Buddy" Lindsay told VOL that the situation with the Diocese of South Carolina is no different from the Anglican Mission in the Americas (AMIA). "The Episcopal Church cannot get its hands on the properties thanks to the All Saints Supreme Court decision."

The Rt. Rev. Greg Brewer, a Communion Partner bishop and TEC Bishop of Central Florida who read Lawrence's speech described it as "heartbreaking."

Interestingly those overseas bishops who sent words of encouragement were all from the same jurisdiction: Egypt, North Africa, Horn of Africa - all under Presiding Bishop Mouneer Anis. Lawrence has been cultivating this relationship for some time. This could indicate from where his future affiliation will come.

Without Anglican authority, the question then becomes: who will Archbishop Justin Welby recognize once he becomes the Archbishop of Canterbury? Welby visited with the TEC House of Bishops last spring and spoke favorably to them.

Another orthodox Anglican Bishop raised the specter of Katharine Jefferts Schori going into Federal court since there is a plurality of jurisdictions (NY vs. SC) and an amount at stake of more than $75,000. By going into federal court, she bypasses entirely the state Supreme Court Dennis Canon ruling and gets a new bite at the apple. 

While Jefferts Schori cannot get her hands on parishes because the Dennis Canon has been ruled out of court, she could go for the diocese's downtown headquarters.

One thing is for sure, TEC's Presiding Bishop will now formally approach Bishop Charles vonRosenberg, a resident retired bishop in the diocese, to lead the rebel FORUM parishes, about a dozen, and form a new diocese with the same name as the current diocese. It is only a matter of time before Lawrence is formally deposed.

In his message to the diocese, Lawrence stated, "South Carolina has been and continues to be a microcosm of North American Anglicanism-with all that is good and vital, and all that is most troubling. In an address at the Mere Anglicanism Conference last January I noted that there were some six overlapping jurisdictions within the boundaries of our diocese all making claims one way or another to being Anglican.

"With the exception of this Diocese of South Carolina, the oldest of these Churches is the Reformed Episcopal Church. There are many REC congregations throughout South Carolina. They reach a good number of people with a vital faith and a strong Anglican tradition. They have a goodly heritage and a seminary just up the road in Summerville. Then there's the Anglican Mission in America (AMiA) which has until recently been the mother church of their movement at Pawleys Island. Recently the All Saints' Pawleys Island congregation voted to associate with the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA). But AMiA has still other congregations scattered across the Low Country-some with bishops and some with rectors. 

"Then this year ACNA ordained a former rector of this diocese, The Rt. Rev. Steve Wood, of St. Andrew's Mt. Pleasant as the first bishop of their new Diocese of the Carolinas, which includes North and South Carolina. St. Andrew's offers dynamic ministry and many within this diocese have kept bridges of relationships with these brothers and sisters in Christ and for this I give thanks. There are other Anglican bodies as well, some of whose bishops I know and some I do not."

Lawrence called the situation "un-Anglican."

"All these bishops overlapping one another - South Carolina may well be the most 'Anglicanized' turf in North America. Everybody's talking about Anglicans. You know what happens when everyone's talking about Baptists? They grow churches. Everyone's' talking about Anglicans. It's our moment."

When asked about affiliation at a press conference following his address, Lawrence commented, "For now-no one. As any wise pastor will tell you, if you been in a troubling, painful or dysfunctional relationship for a long period of time and then the marriage or relationship ends, you would be wise not to jump right away into the first one that comes along and tie the knot. You'd be wise take your time. God will guide us, we will stay in."

You can watch a video of Bishop Lawrence's speech here:
http://www.anglican.tv/content/diocese-south-carolina-special-convention-bishops-address

'via Blog this'

VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - An Open Letter to Sewanee VC McCardell Concerning Status of Diocese of SC.
Big Money Involved at Sewanee




VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - An Open Letter to Sewanee VC McCardell Concerning Status of Diocese of SC:

An Open Letter to Sewanee Vice Chancellor McCardell Concerning Status of Diocese of South Carolina

From VirtueOnline: The Voice of Global Orthodox Anglicanism

David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org 
November 20, 2012 

Dear Dr. McCardell, 

As Vice Chancellor of Sewanee: University of the South, you must be distressed over the horrific news about the long anticipated schism between the Diocese of South Carolina, an owning diocese of the University, and The Episcopal Church, headquartered at 815 Second Avenue in New York City.

VOL's sources tell us that the ugly turmoil will hurt Sewanee's fundraising efforts among South Carolina's finest Episcopalians and best alumni. If this is untrue, please respond accordingly, and I will share the news.

Given the seriousness and rapidity of recent harsh developments for the worse, the Anglican Communion and the Sewanee community of faculty, staff, students, alumni, and donors can no longer wait for your much anticipated and needed statement about the general conditions of the breach; therefore, as the editor of the leading and most reliable Anglican alternative news website, I am posting online this letter of inquiry.

You may reply directly to me, and I will respectfully post your response in a follow up news story.david@virtueonline.org

Your own Low Country South Carolina cottage is located in a safe and non diverse section of beautiful and historic Old Beaufort, which makes St. Helena your home parish. St. Helena still claims membership in Bishop Mark Lawrence's Diocese of South Carolina.

1. Do you consider Bishop Lawrence to be your bishop? 

As of today, Sewanee's website still lists Bishop Lawrence as a Trustee of the University. Based on TEC's hostile attack against Lawrence, and the resolutions confirming withdrawal from TEC that were passed by his diocese yesterday in Charleston, resolutions which included your Parish of St. Helena as a sponsor, your home diocese has now returned to its historic and non integrated independent ecclesiastical existence. 

2. Is Bishop Lawrence still a trustee of Sewanee Episcopal University? 

Based upon news reports, TEC is now organizing rump leadership for a replacement Episcopal diocese in South Carolina, with Bishop Charles vonRosenberg, the retired Bishop of East Tennessee and former Sewanee trustee, as its leader.

3. Is Bishop von Rosenberg your bishop, and do you expect him to replace Bishop Lawrence on Sewanee's board of trustees? 

4. If you do expect Bishop von Rosenberg to replace Bishop Lawrence, or if such a change is probable, why have you not yet notified your alumni and donors in South Carolina of this pending material change in University governance, especially now when many families are considering year end gifts to Sewanee's annual fund? 

5. In general, why have you not kept in constant communication with your most prominent South Carolina donors during this time of grief and regret? Why have you delayed in issuing any statements?

6. If you do issue your forthcoming statement and take a strong stand in favor of Bishop Lawrence, whom at Sewanee, especially at the Seminary, and even at 815, do you most fear will make retribution against you? 

The prominent anti Lawrence, pro TEC lawyer, Josephine Hicks, is a feminist Sewanee alumna. She serves on her law firm's "Diversity Committee."

"Parker Poe was one of the first law firms in North Carolina to have a lawyer provide this type of central oversight of diversity and inclusion initiatives. The Firm also created a Diversity Committee which is charged with developing, monitoring and evaluating Parker Poe's initiatives and progress in recruiting and retaining a diverse workforce and creating a firm-wide atmosphere of inclusiveness."

"In order to further diversify our attorney base, the Firm also actively recruits lateral women and minority partners and associates."

"Our female and minority attorneys are involved in leadership positions within the Firm. One female partner serves on the Board of Directors, a female partner serves as a Practice Group Leader, a female partner serves as Chairperson of the Firm's Diversity Committee, another female partner serves as the Chairperson of the Professional Review Committee, and a female partner serves as the Chairperson of the newly formed Community Service Committee. Our women attorneys also hold a variety of community leadership roles including serving as Chairperson of the North Carolina Symphony Society, Chairperson of the Carolina Ballet, member of the Board of Directors of the Charlotte Women's Bar, Past President of the Wake County Bar Association, and Past President of CREW (Commercial Real Estate Women)."

7. Have you ever had any communications from Josephine Hicks regarding either your or Sewanee's relationship with Bishop Lawrence and his diocese?

In the coming months, massive and horrendous legal attacks are expected from TEC as further assaults against Bishop Lawrence, the Diocese of South Carolina, and even your own St. Helena in Beaufort. As Sewanee is very rich with $318,000,000 of income generating endowment investments, much of it contributed by faithful Episcopalians in South Carolina from generations past and present, Sewanee is in a unique position to help promote justice, reconciliation, and healing in South Carolina. 

8. Will you offer strong leadership to the budget committees at Sewanee to do the right thing by issuing a sizable and Christian affirming financial grant to Bishop Lawrence to help fight off TEC in court?

9. If you do come to the financial and moral aid of "the least of these" in South Carolina, but TEC's brutality against dissent is victorious in the end, will you ask Bishop Lawrence to return his Sewanee honorary degree? 

Sewanee boasts a large contingent of students from South Carolina, as it has for decades. The tenor of your campus for these students can be either positively or negatively affected by TEC's next steps. If not already, Sewanee can quickly become unsafe for these students. 

10. What are you now doing in your position of authority and leadership to engage the pro TEC forces on campus and to guaranteed that South Carolinians at Sewanee are protected from the kind of ugly bigotry and prejudice that creates a hostile learning environment, as well as fuels the kind of unsustainable changes is social climate that permit reprisals and recriminations against those from South Carolina who are institutionally vulnerable because of their true Christian faith? 

Furthermore, and in related news, Bishop Scott Benhase, a Sewanee trustee, has forced TEC's anti Biblical, anti Christian, pro-gay Same Sex Blessings upon Episcopalians in the Diocese of Georgia. He is in keeping with the explicit pro-gay trends that are entrenched in Sewanee and are growing in Sewanee's owning dioceses.

11. Will you allow Same Sex Blessings in Sewanee's Chapel of the Apostles, and if not, why haven't you said so yet, and if so, likewise, why haven't you said so yet? 

We look forward to your responses.

David W. Virtue DD 
VIRTUEONLINE 

'via Blog this'

VirtueOnline - News.
PB Kate Goes Down South To Make Matters Worse.
Learning from John Moldstad?




VirtueOnline - News:

SOUTH CAROLINA: Back Room Politics Begin as Presiding Bishop Heads South to Revamp Diocese
Diocese responds to Presiding Bishop's intrusion: "They cannot assume our identity," says Lawrence

By David W. Virtue 
www.virtueonline.org
December 10, 2012

As the head of the national Episcopal Church, Katharine Jefferts Schori, heads south in January to attend a special convention to choose a new provisional bishop in South Carolina, VOL has learned that fresh political intrigue is figuring into the picture, even as Bishop Mark Lawrence maintains he is the lawful bishop of The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina.

The Presiding Bishop will visit Charleston Jan. 25-26 for the election of the bishop and other diocesan leaders, said Hillery Douglas, chairman of the reorganization steering committee. She will convene a special convention at Grace Episcopal Church, 98 Wentworth St. in Charleston.

VOL was told that there are strong indications that retired Bishop Charles von Rosenberg is Jefferts Schori's provisional bishop of choice and she will appoint him the new leader of the diocese for those dozen or so parishes that wish to form a rump Episcopal diocese. Von Rosenberg was the third bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of East Tennessee.

The South Carolina diocese formally severed ties with the Episcopal Church on Oct. 17, 2012, after long-standing disagreements over same-sex marriages and the ordination of gay bishops.

Jefferts Schori will be welcomed with a reception and other special events Jan. 25. On Jan. 26 a committee of local Episcopalians will work with Jefferts Schori to find a nominee who already is a bishop and could immediately go to work in South Carolina to meet the needs of parishes and people here, said Holly Behre, steering committee communications chairwoman.

In recent years, provisional bishops have been called to serve in other dioceses where groups have broken away from the Episcopal Church. They lead until those dioceses are ready to install a non-provisional bishop, Behre said.

The new rector at Holy Cross/Faith Memorial, The Rev. William J. Keith who was called as recently as July 29 is one of the stalwarts for remaining in TEC. He was nominated and encouraged by von Rosenberg who was his bishop and some say a mentor in East Tennessee. Von Rosenberg is stacking the deck, said the source. 

"Von Rosenberg is purported to be making ecclesiastical decisions as a diocesan so this has obviously been the plan well before the mid October confirmation of what he was telling his friends. 

"He will meet Monday night on Kiawah Island where he has teamed up with Warren Mersereau, the activist layman who signed charges against Bishop Lawrence as well as steering committee member The Rev. Callie Perkins. They will speak to those in the area who want an Episcopal Church presence.

However the Rev. Mike Clarkson of Church of Our Saviour on Johns Island issued a statement today saying they would be following Bishop Mark Lawrence and would therefore be leaving the Episcopal Church. You can read his full statement here http://tinyurl.com/bhkqflf 

Jefferts Schori's last visit to the Diocese of South Carolina was in February 2008.

*****

Diocese Responds to Announcement of January TEC Meeting

Media Release 
December 10, 2012

Following the announcement that the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church plans a trip to Charleston for a January 25-26 convention of those wishing to re-associate with the Episcopal Church, the Diocese of South Carolina released the following statements: "They are certainly free to gather and meet, but they are not free to assume our identity. The Diocese of South Carolina has disassociated from the Episcopal Church, we've not ceased to exist. 

We continue to be the Diocese of South Carolina - also known, legally as the Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina and as the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina, of which I remain the Bishop. 

We are eager to get on with the ministry of Jesus Christ to a broken world. I suggest that the Steering Committee of this new group will want to do the same. A good first step for them would be to select a new name or choose another Diocese with which to associate." 

The Rt. Rev. Mark J. Lawrence XIV Bishop, Diocese of South Carolina "I would like to make a point of clarification for those who think we became a new entity upon our disassociation. A brief history lesson seems in order. We were founded in 1785 (prior to the founding of the Episcopal Church). 

We were incorporated in 1973; adopted our current legal name, "The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina," in 1987; and we disassociated from the Episcopal Church in October of 2012. 

We did not become a new entity upon our disassociation. A new entity will need to be created by those who choose to leave the Diocese and re-associate with the Episcopal Church." 

The Rev. Canon Jim Lewis 
Canon to the Ordinary, 
Diocese of South Carolina 

"They insist on what others must do yet there is no written standard to support them, and at the same time they run roughshod over their own constitution and canons. They have created a tails we win, heads you lose world where the rules are adjusted according to their desired outcomes--no wonder we dissociated from a community like that." 

The Rev. Dr. Kendall S. Harmon 
Canon Theologian, 
Diocese of South Carolina

'via Blog this'

VirtueOnline - News.
The Battle Over the Soper Trust Should Remind WELS of Gurgle Losing in Court Over the MilCraft Estate Gift



VirtueOnline - News: "Ruth Gregory Soper"

Soper Trust Trial Pits Diocese of Washington versus PNC Bank over control of Legacy 
Public Testimony about the Diocese of Washington Anticipated

By Sarah Frances Ives 
Special to Virtueonline
www.virtueonline.org
December 11, 2012

The long-awaited, adversarial trial between the Diocese of Washington and the PNC bank begins the third week of December. From court documents recently released, the trial promises to be a conflicted one as the Diocese of Washington attempts to wrest control of the Soper Trust away from its legally designated manager, PNC Bank. With both sides in this court fight listing the Chief Operating Officer and Canon to the Ordinary Paul E. Cooney as a potential witness, the inner workings and thinking of the Diocese of Washington may be exposed. This fiery engagement will take place in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.

Recently filed papers offer insights about the legal arguments in this long fight between the Diocese of Washington and PNC Bank. Both sides agree that following Mrs. Ruth Gregory Soper's death in 1973, her will bequeathed outright grants of money to nineteen groups, including George Washington University and St. Alban's School.

Yet for the Diocese of Washington, Mrs. Soper set up a trust in perpetuity and gave the Diocese only the interest income only from her trust. Court documents written by PNC Bank point out that Mrs. Soper herself was the recipient of two trusts set up by her father; after her experience living under these managed accounts, she intentionally chose a trust for the Diocese of Washington.

Both sides agree that under PNC's management, the Trust grew from 3.75 million to about 26 million. The Diocese has received 20 million dollars since 1995 from interest alone from the trust managed by PNC Bank. 

Since its beginning, this respected trust had originally been used for charitable works by the Diocese of Washington but since 2002 has been used for operating costs for the diocese. In 2002 the Diocese of Washington Convention passed a resolution stating that they did not want the Soper Trust money to go for operation expenses but this practice has continued to this day. In 2010 the financially-strapped Diocese of Washington challenged the powerful PNC Bank, attempted to claim control over the Soper Trust, and stated that they did not want to pay fees to PNC Bank anymore. 

The Diocese's argument states that Mrs. Soper chose Riggs Bank (now PNC Bank) to oversee her trust because she was not aware of their qualified Diocesan Investment Committee. In Diocesan thinking, Mrs. Soper would have given the money directly to the diocese if she had known of this committee that had been founded in 1950. Diocesan attorneys write, "In the case at bar, circumstances not knowable or foreseeable by Mrs. Soper call for the termination of the Soper Trust. . . .There is no evidence that Mrs. Soper was aware of the existence of the Diocesan Investment Committee." In an argument that seems to compliment PNC Bank's investment, diocesan lawyers also argue that the trust is now larger than was expected at its inception. "There is likewise no evidence that Mrs. Soper foresaw the growth of the Soper Memorial Fund from approximately $3.75 million at her death to approximately 26 million today." (Document 100, pg. 3)

Both of these arguments have the potential of backfiring upon the Diocese with their expression of the unexpected amount of the current Soper trust coupled with the relative inexperience of the Diocesan Investment Committee in handling $26 million dollars. 

In the Diocese of Washington's Proposed 2013 Diocesan Operating Budget, the Interest and Investment Income only totals $120,000 in comparison to the $1,216, 000 from the Soper Trust. In this same budget, the Interest and Investment Income offered 3.2% of the revenues, while the Soper Trust interest managed by PNC Bank offers 32.3% of the revenues. The fitness of the Diocesan Investment Committee to handle $26 million needs to be proven.

The Diocese argues that Mrs. Soper's money is now their money. "It cannot be rationally argued that Mrs. Soper's intent in establishing her trust was for any other purpose aside from benefiting the Diocese." (Document 100, pg. 3) PNC argues that the charitable trust was meant to benefit the community at large and not the Diocese specifically. PNC states that Mrs. Soper intended that the interest would go for charitable works and the trust would continue forever. Indeed, she was knowledgeable about trusts because she had dealt with the two trusts left to her and specifically chose a trust as a way of maintaining her fortune forever, while keeping the corpus of money at arm's length away from the Diocese of Washington.

PNC Bank differentiates between private and charitable trusts and states that charitable trusts are never given to beneficiaries outright. "The Diocese is asking the Court to do something that has not been sustained in any reported court decision-terminate a perpetual charitable trust pursuant to the Claflin doctrine." (Document 98, page 6 of 27.) PNC continues with, "Termination of the Trust would also run contrary to important policies of the law promoting the freedom to give property as one chooses and the creation of charitable trusts. For all these reasons, the Trustee asks the Court to deny the Diocese's Petition."

The court documents state that this case is important for all trust laws and may "open a Pandora's box of new law and litigation" (pg. 24 of 27) The Diocese of Washington has already opened many a Pandora's boxes, this litigation of which is only the latest. With both legal experts and Anglican leaders watching this Soper Trust trial, watchers wait to see what other secrets of diocesan leaders will be exposed in public testimony that is sure to include information about the financial difficulties and inner workings of the Diocese of Washington.


Sarah Frances Ives is a regular correspondent for Virtueonline. She resides with her family in Washington DC

'via Blog this'

Down They Go - Episcopal Dioceses Face Financial Losses - U.s. - Catholic Online

Down They Go - Episcopal Dioceses Face Financial Losses - U.s. - Catholic Online:

"NEW YORK, N.Y. (Virtue On Line) - The Episcopal Church is imploding as dioceses, cathedrals and parishes face huge financial losses as the stock market reels and aging parishioners on fixed incomes rein in their giving. Large well-heeled cardinal parishes have taken tens of thousands of parishioners and their money with them to orthodox Anglican jurisdictions leaving liberal dioceses scrambling for money. At least two dioceses are living mainly on endowments.

It was recently revealed that the Episcopal Church's endowment funds have decreased by 30 percent this year. Treasurer Kurt Barnes told the Executive Council recently that every 5 percent decline in the value of the church's endowments equals $87,000 less revenue for the budget. Ironically, as the overall budget of TEC sinks, millions of dollars in legal fees are being spent to keep parish properties. To date, that figure is $2 million, but it is expected to rise to more than $5 million with coast- to- coast lawsuits in several dioceses.
National Episcopal documents show a large differences in all dioceses between total operating revenue verses total pledge revenue. Many are living off endowments, and many have been hurt by market declines because of heavy investments in the stock market. 

Another official church document shows a decline in numbers of pledging units from 2006-2007. In a number of dioceses, they are going down quicker than attendance indicating that people are not committed. Furthermore, these dioceses will probably see a large Average Sunday Attendances (ASA) declines over the next few years. Also, the large declines in the dioceses that are leaving TEC indicate people are diverting their giving elsewhere, years ahead of those dioceses leaving. 

Across the country, diocesan attendance figures show massive decline. Latest statistics for attendance in 2007 reveal that almost 100,000 fewer people are attending domestic dioceses than in 2003. Many dioceses are down 20%+ since 2003. In short, at least 1 in 5 Episcopalians has left The Episcopal Church. 

The following is a sample of diocesan budgets around the country. 

Recently, it was announced that the Diocese of Eau Claire was in "juncture" talks with the Diocese of Fond du Lac. One of the besetting issues is that Eau Claire doesn't have enough money to hire a bishop following the departure of the Rt. Rev. Keith Whitmore to Atlanta. One of the diocese's options includes fully dissolving the diocese. If the diocese were to dissolve, the 22 congregations and all other assets would be absorbed by the dioceses of Milwaukee and Fond du Lac, which would then revert to their 1927 boundaries. 

The Diocese of Pennsylvania is in crisis mode. Giving has dropped so dramatically that more parishes are expected to close. An $11 million diocesan camp is a financial albatross around the dioceses' neck following the disastrous episcopacy of Charles E. Bennison. 2009 will see diocesan programs cut by as much as 50% with pledges to the national church declining by 43%, Millennium Development Goals payments dropping by 37%, and with investment income to the diocese dropping by 11%. The diocese passed a budget of $1,089,392, but recognized this was a "stretch goal" with no Unrestricted Net Assets (UNA's,). Leaders said the diocese must be prepared for a less than favorable cash flow by as much as $500,000 which would cause a "serious shortfall" and "discomfort." 

Even as delegates boosted salaries and bonus compensation for clergy in 2009 by 5.1%, one delegate told VOL that the parish guidelines are still based on false assumptions that the money will be turned in. "I don't think this budget has a prayer." 

Recently, Washington National Cathedral, the Episcopal Church's flagship cathedral, announced dramatic cuts to its budget, programs and staff. It will slash its budget by 40 percent next year, from $24 million to $14.4 million. More than 40 staffers will be laid off, retail operations at the cathedral's gift shop will be outsourced and the Cathedral College's residential course offerings will cease as of March 31, 2009, according to the cathedral. The cathedral's endowment was valued at $66 million last spring, but has since declined by about 25 percent, according to Michael Hill, executive director for external relations. In May, the cathedral cut $3.5 million from its budget by firing 33 employees and closing its greenhouse. 

The Diocese of Washington lives primarily off of the income from the Ruth Gregory Soper Memorial Trust, (valued in excess of $27 million) the Bishop's Appeal, and other interest and investment income. Parishes, which form the base of diocesan giving, are in decline. Parish giving has not risen as anticipated. The diocese has needed to use more than $1 million each year from the available income to balance its budget, an independent report revealed."

'via Blog this'

The Continued Deterioration of the Washington National Cathedral and Diocese of Washington | anglicansunited.com.
The Episcopal Mark Jeske Is the DC Bishop!

"Now I have them in my power!"


The Continued Deterioration of the Washington National Cathedral and Diocese of Washington | anglicansunited.com:


The Continued Deterioration of the Washington National Cathedral and Diocese of Washington

[Ed. Note:  Money and theological problems continue in the Diocese of Washington. Someone/organization will eventually come forward to restore the National Cathedral, damaged in an earthquake in 2011.  But the diocese? The new bishop Mariann Budde will have a voice in the selection of placement of clergy in Truro and the Falls Church buildings- both massive evangelical parishes with huge costs on historic buildings.  We will continue to watch and report results here.  Cheryl M. Wetzel]
Reprinted by the kindness of David Virtue
By Sarah Frances Ives
Special to Virtueonline
www.virtueonline.org
March 15, 2012
Washington National Cathedral continues its desperate search for money. On March 14, 2012, Associated Press reporter Brett Zongker reported that the Cathedral now acknowledges that they need $20 million for repair costs, as well as $30 million for preexisting preservation needs. They have raised $2 million for repairs and $5 million for operating costs.
In late 2011, in conjunction with cathedral leaders, Mayor Vincent Gray declared the cathedral an “icon” and requested FEMA money. Cathedral officials finally recognized that FEMA money does not fund religious organizations and their application was withdrawn. (See more on this see www.virtueonline.org 10-28-11)
In its frantic search for revenue, the Washington National Cathedral now charges money for admission. When it opened following the August 23 earthquake, they had entirely reshuffled the entrance so that people entering the Cathedral must walk by carefully designed aisles leading to a cashier sitting by a sign with admission fees. No one escapes the cashier’s intent gaze as she requests money.
In the Diocese of Washington, the lawsuit that the Diocese initiated over the Soper Trust fund still moves ahead with a trial scheduled for late March. The Diocese of Washington hopes to gain complete control over the money left by the late Mrs. Ruth Gregory Soper.
Other news from the melting-down Diocese of Washington includes more lay-offs.
On March 8, 2012, Bishop Mariann Budde realized that she was dismissing two long-term employees, Lucy Chumbley, who was the editor of the Washington Window, and Sheryl Wilcox, an event planner for the diocese. The cursory dismissal of the long-term popular writer and editor of the Washington Window has caused both dismay and perplexity in the Diocese of Washington. At least one source said that with Chumbley’s reputation for integrity, she might have threatened Budde by knowing too much about the inner workings of the diocese.
Another diocesan leader states that even though the diocese does face severe financial difficulties, the reason behind these lay-offs is at least partially Budde’s desire to be seen as changing the regime of Bishop John Bryson Chane. The leader who spoke off the record said that the new bishop is largely seen as insecure. Budde frequently speaks of her time as rector in Minneapolis and tells the same stories repeatedly, as if her limited experience will help spark growth in the Diocese of Washington.
Budde’s Continued Adulation of Poet David Whyte
On March 8, 2012, in her weekly “Message from Bishop Mariann”, Budde released her usual weekly thoughts and once again stated that she takes guidance from atheistic guru David Whyte. She writes, “I am well aware this week of that gap between what I, by exertion and discipline, can make happen and what depends on the grace and power of God. I’m reminded by the poet David Whyte that velocity is not always the best answer to complexity.”
What does this mean? Budde’s reference seems to be to an interview David Whyte gave on “Courageous Conversation.” Whyte says that every human must have “intimate conversation with the unknown.”
In the interview, Whyte talks of his time working at a company under duress. He became so stressed that he walked into a meeting of colleagues and asked, “Where is David?” In other words, Whyte asked where he himself was and did not know. His learning from this was that you cannot move faster and faster (i.e. in velocity) when complex situations arise.
Whyte proclaims that he uses some unnamed spiritual force for his thoughts. He states that he does not believe in God. So the Bishop of Washington, Mariann Edgar Budde, follows a man who doesn’t even know what spiritual force he uses. This force is surely not our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ who reveals himself and calls us by name.
Because of Whyte’s connection with his unnamed power, the Diocese of Washington is now led by this same power. The resulting confusion and chaos breeds increased fear among the people. As one person said, “I am just trying to stay out of sight of her.”
We fear that Bishop Budde is already to the point of asking where she herself is. Surely some in her diocese are asking this. Her dismissal of the scriptures is of primary concern. Her continued following of Whyte as her guru promises disaster to the Diocese of Washington.
In response to her thoughts on a blog, two people posted desultory comments thanking her for using David Whyte. No other vigorous comments or debate surfaced. But really, what could be said? The Diocese of Washington has a bishop whose only mission seems to be to turn the Episcopal Church into a David Whyte fan club. Probably only Whyte and his publicists are currently delighted in Budde’s work.
Sarah Frances Ives is a frequent contributor to Virtueonline


'via Blog this'

Breaking up is hard, but right thing for the UMC - The United Methodist Reporter

Breaking up is hard, but right thing for the UMC - The United Methodist Reporter:


By Jack Jackson, Special Contributor…
After years of debate over progressive views of lesbian and gay ordination and marriage, the United Methodist Church reaffirmed its traditional stance at the 2012 General Conference in Tampa, Fla. Due to the UMC’s growth in Africa and Asia and decline in Europe and North America, many progressives fear the denomination will retain current prohibitions around LGBT inclusion for years to come. Advocates of inclusion are, therefore, left with four choices of how to proceed: covenanting to partner with the majority (whether or not it reflects a progressive vision), leaving the denomination for progressive ones, civil disobedience, or starting a conversation for an equitable division of the UMC.

Jack Jackson
This summer, the Western and Northeastern Jurisdictions, along with numerous pastors and churches in other jurisdictions, chose civil disobedience. While calling for noncompliance to the Book of Discipline heartens many progressives, it may destroy the possibility of their progressive Wesleyan vision coming to fruition. Of the four options, I propose that for missional reasons the best alternative for progressives is to begin a conversation about an equitable division of the denomination. By missional I mean a vibrant community of churches that lives its corporate understanding of Christ’s call to ministry in the world.
But let’s look at all four options. The first, to stay in covenant with the UMC while working toward inclusion, is the one most progressives chose over the last 30 years. Despite the demographic shifts mentioned above which indicate United Methodism will retain its theological stance against inclusion, some progressives will choose unity over protest or division. But this is increasingly untenable for many progressives, as evidenced by their recent embrace of the second and third options.
The second option is to leave, or never join, the UMC in favor of progressive, fully inclusive denominations. While it is difficult to quantify the popularity of this option, I know many laity and seminarians who have changed denominational affiliation because of the UMC’s lack of inclusion. Even at General Conference, I talked with people who said they were tired of the conversation, concerned about the poor prospects for change and were leaving for other denominations. My suspicion is that many people simply don’t become United Methodist because of the ongoing conflict over inclusion: progressives because of the UMC’s lack of inclusion; and traditionalists because they don’t want to be part of a denomination that’s in constant turmoil over the issue.
The third option for progressives, one increasingly in play, is civil disobedience. The growing appeal of this was evidenced this summer in three acts: retired Bishop Melvin Talbert’s call to the California-Pacific Conference to act as if denominational prohibitions do not exist; the Western Jurisdiction’s “Statement of Gospel Obedience”; and the Northeastern Jurisdiction’s call to work against the Discipline when conscience dictates. Many progressives now choose to defy General Conference when they believe it acts unjustly and unbiblically.
Destructive option
Yet exercising this option, for a number of reasons, may destroy the possibility for a more progressive vision of Christian mission to flourish in the UMC.
First, progressives don’t seem to have the resources to both stem the tide of decline nationwide and work towards inclusion. The UMC in the West and Northeast is retreating at an alarming rate. Choosing disobedience means resources of time, energy and money will continue to flow to the debate instead of bearing down on the reasons behind the UMC’s plummeting membership. If the UMC is to survive we must focus on the critical problems that plague our denomination. Yet it is the belief that inclusion is a justice issue, worth any cost, along with a belief that time is on progressives’ side, which justifies to some their advocacy of civil disobedience.
Second, there is little if any chance the denomination will become inclusive over the next generation. Africa and Asia, where the UMC is growing, voted almost 100 percent in support of current language. Even if 25 percent of these regions voted for inclusion in the coming years, a highly speculative assumption, General Conference as a whole would still vote to retain current prohibitions. While progressives may grow as a percentage of the UMC in North America, they almost certainly will not grow globally.
Therefore, after another generation of fighting, progressives will be little, if any, closer to making the UMC inclusive. But with 30 additional years of diverted resources and of progressives leaving the UMC for other denominations, the opportunity for a vibrant progressive vision of Christian mission in the UMC will have faded. Progressives will have a sense of pride in fighting the fight, but the result will be a shell of a progressive movement within the UMC. Time is no longer on the progressives’ side.
Third, the civil disobedience option ignores the reality that many progressives are choosing the second option of leaving the UMC or never entering it. People who might have chosen to live out their call to ministry or membership in the UMC are actively looking for, or have already moved to, other denominations. Many young progressives care about the LGBT inclusion, but are not willing to fight in a denomination they see as unfaithful. The longer progressives live in this third option of civil disobedience, the more their future lifeblood drains away.
Fourth, many advocates of civil disobedience ignore, or seem unaware of, the way many traditionalists will respond if current prohibitions are overturned. It is impossible to give percentages, but a significant number of traditionalists will not be part of an inclusive denomination. Were the UMC, either in the United States or globally, to become progressive on LGBT ordination and marriage, many traditionalists would simply exit for new or existing denominations (Wesleyan or otherwise). The result would be an enormous financial and material burden to progressives who remain. Let’s imagine only 10 percent of North American membership were to leave over a few years. The resulting financial burden would overwhelm the current apportionment system, crippling the UMC infrastructure.
These reasons make the choice for civil disobedience a destructive option with little chance of establishing a sustainable, progressive vision of United Methodist mission.
True endgame
If what progressives desire is a vibrant Wesleyan movement rooted in progressive values, especially as they relate to LGBT ordination and marriage, as opposed to an inclusive UMC at any cost, I propose a fourth option. Let’s begin serious discussion about dividing from one UMC to at least two new, distinct denominations.
This conversation would of course have to navigate many significant issues. They would include property (local church, Annual Conference, Jurisdictional Conference and denominational property), clergy pensions and seminaries, to name but a few. Other issues—such as the fact that the progressive/traditionalist divide is not purely geographic as a number of congregations and clergy in the West are rather traditionalist, while many progressives find their home in the Southeast—will also be problematic. Furthermore, the majority of the UMC that tries to live in the middle may be hesitant to claim a home in either a progressive or traditional vision of United Methodism.
Nevertheless, out of missional necessity, and in the light of the denomination’s continued decline, it is time for a conversation to begin on an equitable split of the UMC.
Beginning the conversation acknowledges the true endgame of our current direction: division. Progressive and traditionalist visions of human sexuality are simply incompatible. Most of Protestantism recognizes this. We can argue all we want, but there is no solution to our theological quandary that offers unity, common visions of Christian mission and an ability to focus on the deep systemic issues which plague the UMC.
Starting this conversation will require humility from progressives and traditionalists alike. Progressives will have to realize that time is not on their side and ask for an equitable division, or at least be given the chance to create a new Methodist denomination that reflects their progressive values. They will have to recognize that traditionalists could simply leave the denomination were progressives to succeed, and that their departure would leave a financially unsustainable UMC.
Traditionalists in turn will need to recognize that equitable divisionor allowing progressives to take appropriate assets and form a new progressive denomination, is actually in their best interests. Not allowing a split means a generational fight that they may win, but which will drain their already declining resources for years to come. United Methodism, even its most traditionalist vision, is barely holding its own in the United States. Turning resources towards a vibrant missional future, instead of continuing the fight, will allow traditionalists to focus on the broader mission to which they feel called.
We’ve reached gridlock. The UMC continues its  decline and there is no solution to the stalemate over human sexuality. Division may provide space for the Holy Spirit to bless one or both visions. If Christ’s mission is our goal, and if progressives and traditionalists love our church, then it is our vision of mission, not unity, which must be our prize.
The Rev. Jackson is E. Stanley Jones Assistant Professor of Evangelism, Mission and Global Methodism at Claremont School of Theology and an ordained elder in the Florida Conference.

'via Blog this'


***

GJ - I found this link on the ALPB discussion forum. ELCA is having the same slow-mo split, effectedby one congregation after another leaving - or just not giving any more money. The second style is difficult to measure. Sometimes the ELCA congregation will join the LCMC or NALC officially without leaving ELCA, just so ELCA will kick them out.

The Episcopal Church began splitting before ELCA. Active Episcopal bishops began the departure in some cases.

In ELCA, only retired bishops left - after they had collected plenty in salary and benefits.  I imagine the LCMC (formed from The ALC) wondered where all the NALC leaders (LCA bishops) were in those lonely years before the 2009 ELCA decision. The 2009 decision was made especially famous by the ferocious storm that knocked down the cross on the downtown church where they worshiped.

WELS and Missouri love to work with ELCA while looking down on ELCA. That makes them "confessional."