Saturday, February 23, 2013

Roma Downey and Mark Burnett To Broadcast "The Bible" in March.
Guests at Walmart Saturday Meeting Today.
Sean Combs Spoke about His Efforts To Succeed

Roma Downey is known for "Touched by an Angel,"
and her husband is known for many series and specials.
LI and I attended the Saturday Morning Meeting for Walmart, followed by a fun family day.

I knew nothing of Mark Burnett, so I learned quite a bit when he was introduced. Roma Downey also came to the meeting, causing all the women to ooh and aah.

Little did I realize that they finished a TV project on The Bible, for The History Channel, to be shown next month, climaxing on Easter Sunday, March 31.


The Bible starts in March.
We also heard quite a bit from Sean Combs, who described his childhood, getting five newspaper routes going so he could buy tennis shoes and support his mother.

He impressed the audience with his dedication to work and creating opportunities for others. I knew a little about him as an entertainer, but he is more of a businessman who has used celebrity to branch into many new opportunities.


Sean Combs spoke today in Bentonville, Arkansas.

WELS and Missouri Use the Same Stewardship Principles.
Local megachurch navigates precarious path : Munster News

Local megachurch navigates precarious path : Munster News:





MUNSTER | While the Family Christian Center was spending millions of dollars annually on leadership compensation, travel, meals and jet fuel, it was falling behind on its mortgage payments and racking up a list of past-due bills, a Times investigation found.
Five properties owned by the megachurch were sold last year in the Lake County treasurer's tax sale because of unpaid property taxes, though Family Christian Center later reclaimed four of them, county records show.
Family Christian Center's financial situation grew so precarious, it agreed to turn all its money and financial records over to a court-appointed administrator in 2012.
"When I saw some of the expenditures being made in this church when there was a mortgage not being paid, I was astounded," Lake Superior Court Judge Diane Kavadias Schneider told attorneys during a Dec. 4 hearing relating to a California-based credit union's attempt to foreclose on the church.
At the time the mortgage foreclosure case started in 2011, Family Christian Center had been bringing in about $10 million per year and had a $98,000 monthly mortgage payment, a transcript of the Dec. 4, 2012, hearing states.
'via Blog this'

Reminiscere: The Second Sunday in Lent. Matthew 15:21-28.
Then Jesus answered and said unto her,
O woman, great is thy faith: be it done unto thee even as thou wilt.



REMINISCERE. SECOND SUNDAY IN LENT

German text: Erlangen edition 11:121; Walch 11:744; St. Louis 11:544.

TEXT:

Matthew 15:21-28. And Jesus went out thence, and withdrew into the parts of Tyre and Sidon. And behold, a Canaanitish woman came out from those borders and cried, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a demon. But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. But he answered and said, I was not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. But she came and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. And he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children’s bread and cast it to the dogs. But she said, Yea, Lord: for even the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters’ table. Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it done unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was healed from that hour.

CONTENTS:

THE FAITH OF THE SYROPHENICIAN WOMAN, AND THE SPIRITUAL INTERPRETATION OF THIS GOSPEL.
I. HER FAITH.

1. Her faith was truly perfect

2. How and whence her faith originated 2-3.

3. How Christ tries her faith.

A. The First Trial. a. The trial itself 4. b. The conduct of the woman during this trial 5.

B. The Second Trial. a. The trial itself 5-6. b. The conduct of the woman during this trial 7.

C. The Third Trial. a. The trial itself 8. b. The conduct of the woman during this trial 9.

II. THE SPIRITUAL INTERPRETATION OF THIS GOSPEL.

1. The first part of this interpretation 10-12.

2. The second part of this interpretation 13.

3. The conclusion of this discourse

1. This Gospel presents to us a true example of firm and perfect faith. For this woman endures and overcomes in three great and hard battles, and teaches us in a beautiful manner the true way and virtue of faith, namely, that it is a hearty trust in the grace and goodness of God as experienced and revealed through his Word. For St. Mark says, she heard some news about Jesus, Mark 7:25. What kind of news? Without doubt good news, and the good report that Christ was a pious man and cheerfully helped everybody. Such news about God is a true Gospel and a word of grace, out of which sprang the faith of this woman; for had she not believed, she would not have thus run after Christ etc. In like manner we have often heard how St. Paul in Romans 10:17 says that faith cometh by hearing, that the Word must go in advance and be the beginning of our salvation.

2. But how is it that many more have heard this good news concerning Christ, who have not followed him, and did not esteem it as good news?

Answer: The physician is helpful and welcome to the sick; the healthy have no use for him. But this woman felt her need, hence she followed the sweet scent, as is written in the Song of Solomon 1:3. In like manner Moses must precede and teach people to feel their sins in order that grace may be sweet and welcome to them. Therefore all is in vain, however friendly and lovely Christ may be pictured, if man is not first humbled by a knowledge of himself and he possesses no longing for Christ, as Mary’s Song says, “The hungry he hath filled with good things; and the rich he hath sent empty away,” Luke 1:53. All this is spoken and written for the comfort of the distressed, the poor, the needy, the sinful, the despised, so that they may know in all times of need to whom to flee and where to seek comfort and help.

3. But see in this example how Christ like a hunter exercises and chases faith in his followers in order that it may become strong and firm. First when the woman follows him upon hearing of his fame and cries with assured confidence that he would according to his reputation deal mercifully with her, Christ certainly acts differently, as if to let her faith and good confidence be in vain and turn his good reputation into a lie, so that she could have thought: Is this the gracious, friendly man? or: Are these the good words, that I have heard spoken about him, upon which I have depended? It must not be true; he is my enemy and will not receive me; nevertheless he might speak a word and tell me that he will have nothing to do with me. Now he is as silent as a stone. Behold, this is a very hard rebuff, when God appears so earnest and angry and conceals his grace so high and deep; as those know so well, who feel and experience it in their hearts. Therefore she imagines he will not fulfill what he has spoken, and will let his Word be false; as it happened to the children of Israel at the Red Sea and to many other saints.

4. Now, what does the poor woman do? She turns her eyes from all this unfriendly treatment of Christ; all this does not lead her astray, neither does she take it to heart, but she continues immediately and firmly to cling in her confidence to the good news she had heard and embraced concerning him, and never gives up. We must also do the same and learn firmly to cling to the Word, even though Go with all his creatures appears different than his Word teaches. But, oh, how painful it is to nature and reason, that this woman should strip herself of self and forsake all that she experienced, and cling alone to God’s bare Word, until she experienced the contrary. May God help us in time of need and of death to possess like courage and faith!

5. Secondly, since her cry and faith avail nothing, the disciples approach with their faith, and pray for her, and imagine they will surely be heard. But while they thought he should be more tenderhearted, he became only the more indifferent, as we see and think. For now he is silent no more nor leaves them in doubt; he declines their prayer and says: “I was not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” This rebuff is still harder since not only our own person is rejected, but the only comfort that remains to us, namely, the comfort and prayers of pious and holy persons, are rejected. For our last resort, when we feel that God is ungracious or we are in need, is that we go to pious, spiritual persons and there seek counsel and help, and they are willing to help as love demands; and yet, that may amount to nothing, even they may not be heard and our condition becomes only worse.

6. Here one might upbraid Christ with all the words in which he promised to hear his saints, as Matthew 18:19: “If two of you shall agree on earth as touching anything that they shall ask, it shall be done for them.”

Likewise, Mark 11:24: “All things whatsoever ye pray and ask for, believe that ye receive them, and ye shall have them;” and many more like passages. What becomes of such promises in this woman’s case? Christ, however, promptly answers and says: Yes, it is true, I hear all prayers, but I gave these promises only to the house of Israel. What do you think? Is not that a thunderbolt that dashes both heart and faith into a thousand pieces, when one feels that God’s Word, upon which one trusts, was not spoken for him, but applies only to others? Here all saints and prayers must be speechless, yea, here the heart must let go of the Word, to which it would gladly hold, if it would consult its oven feelings.

7. But what does the poor woman do? She does not give up, she clings to the Word although it be torn out of her heart by force, is not turned away by this stern answer, still firmly believes his goodness is yet concealed in that answer, and still she will not pass judgment that Christ is or may be ungracious. That is persevering steadfastness.

8. Thirdly, she follows Christ into the house, as Mark 7:24-25 informs us, perseveres, falls down at his feet, and says: “Lord, help me!” There she received her last mortal blow, in that Christ said in her face, as the words tell, that she was a dog, and not worthy to partake of the children’s bread.

What will she say to this! Here he presents her in a bad light, she is a condemned and an outcast person, who is not to be reckoned among God’s chosen ones.

9. That is an eternally unanswerable reply, to which no one can give a satisfactory answer. Yet she does not despair, but agrees with his judgment and concedes she is a dog, and desires also no more than a dog is entitled to, namely, that she may eat the crumbs that fall from the table of the Lord.

Is not that a masterly stroke as a reply? She catches Christ with his own words. He compares her to a dog, she concedes it, and asks nothing more than that he let her be a dog, as he himself judged her to be. Where will Christ now take refuge? He is caught. Truly, people let the dog have the crumbs under the table; it is entitled to that. Therefore Christ now completely opens his heart to her and yields to her will, so that she is now no dog, but even a child of Israel.

10. All this, however, is written for our comfort and instruction, that we may know how deeply God conceals his grace before our face, and that we may not estimate him according to our feelings and thinking, but strictly according to his Word. For here you see, though Christ appears to be even hardhearted, yet he gives no final decision by saying “No.” All his answers indeed sound like no, but they are not no, they remain undecided and pending. For he does not say: I will not hear thee; but is silent and passive, and says neither yes nor no. In like manner he does not say she is not of the house of Israel; but he is sent only to the house of Israel; he leaves it undecided and pending between yes and no. So he does not say, Thou art a dog, one should not give thee of the children’s bread; but it is not meet to take the children’s bread and cast it to the dogs; leaving it undecided whether she is a dog or not. Yet all those trials of her faith sounded more like no than yes; but there was more yea in them than nay; ay, there is only yes in them, but it is very deep and very concealed, while there appears to be nothing but no.

11. By this is set forth the condition of our heart in times of temptation; Christ here represents how it feels. It thinks there is nothing but no and yet that is not true. Therefore it must turn from this feeling and lay hold of and retain the deep spiritual yes under and above the no with a firm faith in God’s Word, as this poor woman does, and say God is right in his judgment which he visits upon us; then we have triumphed and caught Christ in his own words. As for example when we feel in our conscience that God rebukes us as sinners and judges us unworthy of the kingdom of heaven, then we experience hell, and we think we are lost forever. Now whoever understands here the actions of this poor woman and catches God in his own judgment, and says: Lord, it is true, I am a sinner and not worthy of thy grace; but still thou hast promised sinners forgiveness, and thou art come not to call the righteous, but, as St. Paul says in 1 Timothy 1:15, “to save sinners.” Behold, then must God according to his own judgment have mercy upon us.

12. King Manasseh did likewise in his penitence as his prayer proves; he conceded that God was right in his judgment and accused himself as a great sinner and yet he laid hold of the promised forgiveness of sins. David also does likewise in Psalm 51:4 and says: “Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, and done that which is evil in thy sight; that thou mayest be justified when thou speakest, and be clear when thou judgest.” For God’s disfavor in every way visits us when we cannot agree with his judgment nor say yea and amen, when he considers and judges us to be sinners. If the condemned could do this, they would that very moment be saved. We say indeed with our mouth that we are sinners; but when God himself says it in our hearts, then we are not sinners, and eagerly wish to be considered pious and free from that judgment. But it must be so; if God is to be righteous in his words that teach you are a sinner, then you may claim the rights of all sinners that God has given them, namely, the forgiveness of sins. Then you eat not only the crumbs under the table as the little dogs do; but you are also a child and have God as your portion according to the pleasure of your will.

13. This is the spiritual meaning of our Gospel and the scriptural explanation of it. For what this poor woman experienced in the bodily affliction of her daughter, whom she miraculously caused to be restored to health again by her faith, that we also experience when we wish to be healed of our ,sins and of our spiritual diseases, which is truly a wicked devil possessing us; here she must become a dog and we become sinners and brands of hell, and then we have already recovered from our sickness and are saved.

14. Whatever more there is in this Gospel worthy of notice, as that one can obtain grace and help through the faith of another without his own personal faith, as took place here in the daughter of this poor woman, has been sufficiently treated elsewhere. Furthermore that Christ and his disciples along with the woman in this Gospel exhibit to us an example of love, in that no one acts, prays and cares for himself but each for others, is also clear enough and worthy of consideration.


Hiding The Decline | Orphans of Liberty



Hiding The Decline | Orphans of Liberty:

"I’ve just finished Andrew Montford’s book Hiding The Decline, about the Climategate affair, its background, impact and the various inquiries it stimulated. The author is of course the chap who runs the well-known and respected climate blog Bishop Hill.

As with Montford’s earlier work, The Hockey Stick Illusion, Hiding The Decline is clearly written with technicalities kept to a bare minimum, making it easy to read if a little dry in places.

The two books complement each other, but it is not essential to have read the earlier book in order to understand Hiding The Decline. In fact the first part of Hiding The Decline covers the Hockey Stick story in order to set the scene for those extraordinary Climategate revelations.

Most people interested in the subject will already know "

'via Blog this'

One of the Worst Degrees - Return on Investment.
Best ROI - Fuller or Trinity Divinity - in the WELS/LCMS/ELS

"MDiv from our seminary?
Sorry - we do not want you now.
Too bad about all that debt."


bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "LCMS Seminary Cost Scandal: Fabulous Costs To Supp...":

A Theology Degree is the degree with the fifth worst Return on Investment (ROI), but that's assuming it's just a 4-year degree for comparison purposes. If eight years of schooling were assumed before one could obtain a decent job, and a pricey education at private colleges and seminaries rather than state schools were assumed, the formula would judge it to be the degree with the worst ROI by far:

5. Religious Studies/Theology Degree 5th Worst ROI:

http://salary.com/8-college-degrees-with-the-worst-return-on-investment/slide/6/

Methodology/Formula:

http://salary.com/8-college-degrees-with-the-worst-return-on-investment/slide/2/


To determine ROI, we subtracted the cost of the degree from the gains over 30 years, then divided that figure by cost.

Using data from a recent College Board study, we assigned a figure of $37,343 as an average cost of a four-year public liberal arts degree, and a figure of $121,930 for degrees earned at four-year private colleges.

"What if we go multi-cultural?"

David Clearwood Boisclair - Trying To Rescue Romans 4:25 for UOJ



David Boisclair has left a new comment on your post "Another Plea for UOJ: Tragedy, Pity, Incomplete Se...":

I appreciate the courteous conversation, which LPC continues. As to the "us" of Romans 4:25 it could also refer to the "us" of all humanity as well as to the "us" of the regenerated (renati).

LPC states, "...there is no justification of the unbleiver (sic) while he is in the state of unbelief" is true if one speaks of justification here as the conferral and reception of forgiveness by saving faith--such conferral and reception is necessary for salvation. When a person is an unbeliever, he is not saved (Heb. 11:6). I reiterate: I am not a Universalist.

The doctrine of Objective Justification is solidly opposed to Calvinism with its teaching of a limited atonement. Objective Justification is the perfect atonement of Christ that is the object of saving faith. Christ died for the sins of the whole world of sinners, and His resurrection is God's declaration that all sins are atoned for.

Lutheran doctrine also opposes the Calvinist doctrine of Irresistible Grace because it is the biblical doctrine of the resistibility of grace as it comes to us through means, the means of grace. While we teach the divine monergism that if a person is saved it is all God's doing (sola gratia) yet we believe that the person does have the power of resisting God's saving grace as it comes to him in the means of grace. I would add too that God only comes to us by Gospel Word and Sacrament. As you can see I am not an Enthusiast (Schwaermer).

Another point is that it is wrong to speak of two justifications: there is only one. It involves the following: 1) God's saving grace, 2) Christ's perfect vicarious atonement, 3) the Gospel of Christ, and 4) the Holy Spirit's gift of saving faith in the heart of the individual who hears that Gospel or who receives Baptism or the Lord's Supper.  




---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "David Clearwood Boisclair - Trying To Rescue Roman...":

Rev. Boisclair, your entire statement is contrary to Scripture. They are classic UOJ defenses but because Scripture never teaches Objective Justification they are taken out of context and thereby change and pervert Christ’s Word.

You state that “us” in Romans 4:25 could mean all of humanity and thereby teach the whole unbelieving world has been justified by Christ’s atonement. Here is the context of that verse:

Romans 4: 22 through Romans 5:2
22 And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness.
23 Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him;
24 But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead;
25 Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification
1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:
2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.

Dr. Cruz was correct when asserting Rom. 4:25 refers only to believers. Verse 22-24: the imputation of Christ’s righteousness is only through faith unto those who believe in Christ. Verse 1 of Chapter 5 extends and clarifies the declaration in verse 25 of Chapter 24 that the justification in 24 is by faith alone. And the peace, or grace, with God through Christ’s atonement is a result of being justified by faith.

Rev. Boisclair states, ”LPC states, "...there is no justification of the unbeliever (sic) while he is in the state of unbelief" is true if one speaks of justification here as the conferral and reception of forgiveness by saving faith—“

Please note that the BOC rejects UOJ’s perversion and only acknowledges two teachings regarding the use of Justification in Scripture and neither apply to unbelievers as Rev. Boisclair and the false gospel of UOJ would have everyone believe.
The Christian Book of Concord, 71] “but we maintain this, that properly and truly, by faith itself, we are for Christ's sake accounted righteous, or are acceptable to God. And because "to be justified" means that out of unjust men just men are made, or born again, it means also that they are pronounced or accounted just. For Scripture speaks in both ways. [The term "to be justified" is used in two ways: to denote, being converted or regenerated; again, being accounted righteous. Accordingly we wish first to show this, that faith alone makes of an unjust, a just man, i.e., receives remission of sins".
http://www.bookofconcord.org/defense_4_justification.php

Rev. Boisclair, “Objective Justification is the perfect atonement of Christ that is the object of saving faith.”
No, it is false teaching to make OJ the object of faith. Throughout Scripture, as you were abundantly shown during the Intrepid discussion, the object of faith is Christ. UOJ: false object, false gospel.

Cont... 


---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "David Clearwood Boisclair - Trying To Rescue Roman...":

Cont...

You deny being an enthusiast but the doctrine of UOJ teaches the whole world of unbelievers were declared by God’s divine verdict to be forgiven all sin: justified, righteous and guiltless before God and worthy of eternal life – all while remaining under the Law, at war with Christ, alive to sin, under the dominion of the Devil and under God’s wrath and condemnation. You deny being a Universalist but you have used Romans 5:18, “Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.” as a sedes passage for Objective Justification which applies to the whole unbelieving world – when Rom 5:18 teaches that the justification spoken of is eternal life – “…unto justification of life.” You claim not be a Universalist (as most UOJists attempt) just as Jeffrey Dahmer said he wasn’t a cannibal. Your confession speaks for itself.

An important point for everyone studying the doctrine of Objective Justification. UOJists definition of Atonement, Redemption, Faith and the three solas are all contrary to Scripture’s definitions. Note how Rev. Boisclair’s phrase, ”saving faith.” The faith of a UOJist is not the righteousness of Christ by which an individual clings to Christ alone for the forgiveness of his sins. Faith is simply the receiving instrument by which the individual receives the benefit of the forgiveness God already bestowed – eternal life. So the phrase “saving faith” is a denial of Christ’s righteousness, the effect of being forgiven by God and the Gospel of Christ.  

Romans 4:25 Teaches Against UOJ - Dr. Lito Cruz

Walther - Now you must make a decision for UOJ,
and you will be saved.


LPC has left a new comment on your post "Another Plea for UOJ: Tragedy, Pity, Incomplete Se...":

I imagine Rev. Bosclair knows the original text and was taught proper exegesis in Seminary such as respecting context, or was he?

Romans 4:25 refers to believers and it is prospective. In fact even if it is taken as retrospective, it is blocked by the meaning of "our" in that verse - it refers to believers. Ichabod pointed out also that the continuing verse in Romans 5:1 shows that there is no justification of the unbeliever while he is in the state of unbelief.

This is indeed where the UOJ Lutherans are so peculiar to the rest of the 

a.) the Lutheran world, 
b.) to the rest of the Protestant world also.

I (as a former Calvinist) admonish Rev. Bosclair -- that if he buys the dual justification scheme, he has adopted unwittingly the presuppositions of Calvinism's central doctrine of their church, predestination and rationalism, not Justification By Faith Alone.

LPC





***

GJ - Dr. Lito Cruz is correct. Calvin's divine decree of double-predestination is completely separate from the Word of God and from faith in Christ. As many Calvinists teach, this "terrible decree" (Calvin's words) was uttered before the Creation of the universe.

No wonder it was never recorded in the Scriptures.

According to Calvin, God decreed that the vast majority were doomed to eternal punishment before they were born, while the elite were elected to eternal bliss, apart from faith. That sounds terribly UOJish. Read and marvel at Walther separating election from the Gospel and faith. Compare and contrast. 

Calvin even calculated that only 20% of Christians were really saved, an opinion that has plagued his followers ever since. They wonder, "How do I really know?" Faith in Christ has nothing to do with the terrible decree. Nor does church membership, although it is a plus. One would hope that the elect actually belonged to a church.

Twain remarked humorously that a good Calvinist sermon whittled down the numbers of the elect to such a tiny number that it was not worth the effort to be one.


KJV Romans 4:22 And therefore it was imputed to him [Abraham] for righteousness. 23 Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; 24 But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on Him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead; 25 Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.

[The argument continues with the next two verses and all of Romans 5.]


5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: 2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.