ICHABOD, THE GLORY HAS DEPARTED - explores the Age of Apostasy, predicted in 2 Thessalonians 2:3, to attack Objective Faithless Justification, Church Growth Clowns, and their ringmasters. The antidote to these poisons is trusting the efficacious Word in the Means of Grace. John 16:8. Isaiah 55:8ff. Romans 10. Most readers are WELS, LCMS, ELS, or ELCA. This blog also covers the Roman Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodoxy, and the Left-wing, National Council of Churches denominations.
Martin Luther Sermons
Bethany Lutheran Hymnal Blog
Bethany Lutheran Church P.O. Box 6561 Springdale AR 72766 Reformation Seminary Lectures USA, Canada, Australia, Philippines 10 AM Central - Sunday Service
We use The Lutheran Hymnal and the King James Version
Luther's Sermons: Lenker Edition
Click here for the latest YouTube Videos
Saturday, September 29, 2018
Luther's Sermon on Law and Gospel - Matthew 22:34-46.
The Eighteenth Sunday after Trinity
EIGHTEENTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY.
SECOND SERMON:
MATTHEW 22:34-46.
KJV Matthew 22:34 But when the Pharisees had heard that he had put the Sadducees to silence, they were gathered together. 35 Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying, 36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law? 37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 38 This is the first and great commandment. 39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets. 41 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus
asked them, 42 Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David. 43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, 44 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? 45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son? 46 And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions.
1. In this Gospel Christ answers the question the Pharisees put to him:
Which is the greatest commandment in the Law ? and in turn asks them the question: What think ye of the Christ, whose son is he ? Thus this Gospel presents to us that which we continually hear and should hear, so that these two sermons must continue to be preached in Christendom, namely: the first, the teaching of the Law or of the ten commandments, and the second, the doctrine concerning the grace of Christ. For if either of these fall it pulls the other with it; while on the other hand, wherever the one remains steadfast and is faithfully put into practice, it brings the other with it.
2. And God has ordained that these two themes shall be preached forever in the Christian Church, yea, they have always since the beginning of the world accompanied one another; they were given to our father Adam, while he was still in Paradise, and were later confirmed through Abraham, Moses and the Prophets.
For they are required by the needs of humanity, fallen as it is under the power of satan, so that we live and move in sin and are worthy of eternal death. Adam felt and lamented sin and its injuries; but later the sense of sin soon weakened and was disregarded, so that the heathen did not consider it sin although they indeed felt evil lust and desire in their bodies; but they imagined all that belonged to the character and nature of man. Yet they taught man should restrain such lust and desires and not allow them to go too far; but this nature in itself they did not condemn.
3. Therefore God gave this one simple teaching that reveals what man is, what he has been, and what he should again become. This is the doctrine of the Law, which Christ here cites: “Thou shalt love God with all thy heart, etc.” As if to say: Thus thou hast been, and thus thou shalt still be and become. In Paradise you were in possession of the treasure, and were thus created that you loved God with all your heart; this you have lost; but now you must again become as you were, or you will never enter the Kingdom of God. In like manner he speaks clearly and plainly in other places, Matthew 19:17: “If thou wouldst enter into life, keep the commandments.” Likewise, Luke 10:28: “This do and thou shalt live, etc.” This must in short be kept; and that we wish to dispute so much about it amounts to nothing, as if one might be saved without it, namely, without that which is called loving God with the whole heart and your neighbor as yourself. This divine law must be fulfilled by you as purely and completely as the angels in heaven fulfill it.
4. Therefore it is wrong and not to be allowed, as some in ancient times said and as some stupid spirits now say: Although you do not keep the commandment, and do not love God and your neighbor, yea, although you are even an adulterer, that makes no difference, if you only believe, then you will be saved. No, dear mortal, that amounts to nothing; you will never thus gain heaven; it must come to the point that you keep the commandments, and abide in love toward God and your neighbor. For there it stands briefly determined; “If thou wouldst enter into life, keep the commandments.” Again, to the Galatians, 5:19-21: “Now the works of the flesh are manifest, of which I forewarn you, even as I did forewarn you, that those who practice such things, shall not inherit the Kingdom of Heaven, etc.”
5. And Christ wishes this doctrine to be observed by the Christians so that they may know what they have been, what they are still lacking and what they should again become, that they continue not in the misery and filth in which they find themselves now; for if they do, they must be lost.
Christ speaks right out plainly in Matthew 5:17-18: “Think not that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets; I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, the Law must be so taught and observed that not the smallest letter or one tittle of it shall in any wise pass away, till all things be accomplished.” Again, Christ says further in Matthew 12:36: “And I say unto you, that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof on the day of judgment.” And St. Paul in Romans 8:4: “God sent his Son in the flesh that the righteousness, required by the Law, might be fulfilled in us.” And in Romans 3:31: “Do we then make the Law of none effect if we teach man is justified through faith, and not through works. That is far from us; nay, we establish the Law.” That is, for this very reason we teach faith, by which the law is fulfilled.
6. For this is indeed a glorious doctrine that teaches what we are to become; but that it may also be realized and not continue to be preached in vain, the other doctrine must be added, namely, how and through what means we may again return to our former state. We return when we hear what we lost in Paradise; when Adam lived in full love to God, and in pure love to his neighbor, and in perfect obedience without evil lust, and that had he remained thus we would still be so; but now, since through sin he fell from this command, we also lie in the same misery, full of sin and disobedience, under God’s wrath and curse, and fall from one sin to another, and the Law stands there, holds us guilty, urges and requires us to be pious and obedient to God.
7. What shall we then do here, since the Law continually commands and drives us, and we are powerless? For here my own conscience argues ever against me: Since I am to love God with my whole heart and my neighbor as myself, and I do not do it, I must therefore be condemned and God approves and confirms the sentence of condemnation. Who will counsel me in this instance? I do not know what to counsel you, says the Law; but it decrees and demands plainly that you be obedient.
Here the Prophets come now, and preach Christ, and say: One is coming who will give counsel how man may regain what he lost and again enter the state from which he fell, to which the Law points him. This is the other sermon that should and must be preached until the day of judgment, namely, the help from sin, death and satan, and restoration of our bodies and souls, so that we may come into the state that we love God and our neighbor from our hearts. This is to be done fully and perfectly in the future life, but here in this life it should be commenced.
8. For in the life beyond there will be no longer any faith, but perfect love, and all the Law demands we will do with our whole heart. Therefore we must now preach what we should become and should forever continue to be, namely, that we are to love God and our neighbor with our whole heart. This I will commence, says Christ, and complete, not alone as to my own person, but I will aid you to make a beginning, and to continue ever in it, until you come where you will also fulfill it perfectly.
9. Now this will come to pass thus. Since we are unable to keep the Law and it is impossible for the natural man to do so, Christ came and stepped between the Father and us, and prays for us: Beloved Father, be gracious unto them and forgive them their sins. I will take upon me their transgressions and bear them; I love thee with my whole heart, and in addition the entire human race, and this I will prove by shedding my blood for mankind. Moreover, I have fulfilled the Law and I did it for their welfare in order that they may partake of my fulfilling the Law and thereby come to grace.
10. Thus there is first given us through Christ the sense that we do not fulfill the Law and that sin is fully and completely forgiven: however, this is not bestowed in a way or to the end, that we in the future need not keep the Law, and may forever continue to sin, or that we should teach, if we have faith then we need no longer to love God and our neighbor. But there is bestowed upon us the sense that the fulfilling of the Law may now for the first time be successfully attempted and perfectly realized, and this is the eternal, fixed and unchangeable will of God. To this end it is necessary to preach grace, that man may find counsel and help to come to a perfect life.
11. But the help offered us is, that Christ prays the Father to forgive us our sins against this Law, and not to impute what we are still indebted. Then he promises also to give the Holy Spirit, by whose aid the heart begins to love God and to keep his commandments. For God is not gracious and merciful to sinners to the end that they might not keep his Law, nor that they should remain as they were before they received grace and mercy; but he condones and forgives both sin and death for the sake of Christ, who has fulfilled the whole Law in order thereby to make the heart sweet and through the Holy Spirit to kindle and move the heart to begin again to love from day to day more and more.
12. Thus begins in us not only love, but also truth, that is, a true character, as the Law requires; like St. John says in 1:17, that Christ is full of grace and truth, and through him grace and truth grow in us, which neither Moses nor the law can give us. For the Law is not abolished thus by grace, that the truth is to be overlooked, and that we should not love God; but through him we experience that we do not as perfectly keep the Law as we ought in the kingdom of forgiveness or of grace. But besides the Holy Spirit is given us, who kindles a new flame or fire in us, namely, love and desire to do God’s commandments. In the kingdom of grace this should begin and ever grow until the day of judgment, when it shall no longer be called grace or forgiveness, but pure truth and perfect obedience. In the meantime he continues to give, forgive, to bear and forbear, until we are laid in our graves.
13. Now if we thus continue in faith, that is, in what the Holy Spirit gives and forgives, in what he begins and ends, then the fire on the judgment day, by which the whole world is to be consumed, will cleanse and purify us, so that we will no longer need this giving and forgiving, as if there were something unclean and sinful in us, as there really is at present; we will certainly be as the brightness of the dear sun, without spot and defect, full of love, as Adam was at the beginning in Paradise.
Thus will it then be truly said, the Law is established and fulfilled, Romans 3:31. For it will then no longer blame and rebuke us; but the Law shall be considered satisfied, and the debt paid, even by ourselves; since all is now fulfilled, not through us, and yet by it we are freed and saved, so that we creep under Christ’s mantle and wings, that he makes satisfaction for us until we lie under the earth and then come again out of the grave with a beautiful, glorified body that will be nothing but holiness and purity, with a cleansed soul full of the love of God. Then we will no longer be in need of his mantle and of his prayers, but we will all be there perfect and complete, as we should be. Now, since I believe in him, my sins are forgiven and I am called a child of grace. And moreover, the truth also should arise in me, that is, a new righteous character, that shall continue until it perfects me; since Christ, the truth, has come, not to destroy the Law, but to establish it, not only in himself, which was done long ago. but in me and in all Christians.
14. These are the two doctrines that should accompany one another, since they belong together or the one is in the other, and they must always go together as long as we live here, by which the Law or God’s commandment may begin to work in Christians, so that the wicked, disobedient persons of the world may be restrained and punished. Since they will not fear and love God like Christians and believers, they are obliged to fear eternal fire, perdition and other punishments. Others, however, will be taught by it from what they have fallen and how sorely and fully they have inherited sin.
15. For when I compare my life with the Law I see and experience always the contrary of what the Law enjoins. I shall entrust to God my body and soul, and love him with my whole heart; yet, I would rather have a dollar in my chest than ten gods in my heart, and I am happier when I know how to make ten dollars, than when I hear the whole Gospel. Let a prince give a person a castle or several thousand dollars, what a jumping and rejoicing it creates! On the other hand, let a person be baptized or receive the communion which is a heavenly, eternal treasure, there is not one-tenth as much rejoicing. Thus we are by nature; there is none who so heartily rejoices over God’s gifts and grace as over money and earthly possessions; what does that mean but that we do not love God as we ought? For if we trusted and loved him, we would rejoice more that he gave us the sense of sight than if we possessed the whole world. And the word of consolation he speaks to me through the Gospel ought to give me higher joy than the favor, money, wealth and honor of the whole world. But that it is not so and ten thousand dollars can make people happier than all the grace and possessions of God, proves what kind of fruit we are, and what a distressing and horrible fall it is in which we lie. And yet we would not see nor realize it, if it were not revealed to us through the Law, and we would have to remain forever in it and be lost, if we were not again helped out of it through Christ. Therefore the Law and the Gospel are given to the end that we may learn to know both how guilty we are and to what we should again return.
16. This now is the Christian teaching and preaching, which, God be praised, we know and possess, and it is not necessary at present to develop it further, but only to offer the admonition that it be maintained in Christendom with all diligence. For satan has continually attacked it hard and strong from the beginning until the present, and gladly would he completely extinguish it and tread it under foot. For he cannot endure that the people continue in it and conduct themselves uprightly and he seeks a hundred thousand arts and wiles only to crush it. Therefore I so gladly preach it, as it is greatly needed; for until the present it has never been heard nor known in the Papacy.
17. For I myself was a learned doctor of theology and yet I never understood the ten commandments rightly. Yea, there were many highly celebrated doctors who did not know whether there were nine, ten or eleven commandments, and much less did we know the Gospel and Christ.
But the only thing that was taught and advocated was: Invoke the Virgin Mary and other saints as your mediators and intercessors; fast often and pray much; make pilgrimages, enter cloisters and become monks, or pay for the saying of many masses and like works. And thus we imagined when we did these things we had merited heaven.
18. That was the time of blindness when we knew nothing of God’s Word, but led ourselves and others into misery by our own idle talk and dreams.
And I was one of those who indeed bathed in this sweat or in this bath of anxiety. Therefore let us give heed that we may thoroughly grasp and retain this doctrine, if other fanatics and false spirits wish to attack it, so that we may be fore-armed and learn, while we have the time and the beloved sun again enlightens us, and buy while the market is at our door.
For it will come to this when once these lights, which God now gives, have departed, satan will not take a furlough until he raises up other fanatical spirits to do harm; as he has already commenced to do in many places during our generation. What will take place after we are gone?
19. Therefore learn, who can learn, and learn well, so that we may know, first the ten commandments, what we owe to God. For if we do not know this, then we know nothing and we will not inquire about Christ in the least. Just like we monks did who either held Christ to be an angry judge or despised him entirely in the face of our imaginary holiness. We fancied we were not in sin, which the ten commandments show and punish; but we had the natural light of reason and free will, and if we lived according to that, as much as we were able, then God would have to bestow upon us his grace, etc. But now, if we are to know Christ as our helper and Savior, then we must first know, out of what he can help us, not out of fire or water, or other bodily need and danger, but out of sin and the hatred of God. But whence do I know that I lie drowned in misery? From no other source than from the Law, that must show me what my loss and disease are, or I will never inquire for the physician and his help.
20. Thus we have both parts of the help of Christ: the one, that he must represent us over against God and be a cloak to cover our shame, as the one who takes upon himself our sins and disgrace; a cloak, I say, for us, as the one who takes our sins and shame upon himself, but before God a throne of grace in whom there is no sin or shame; but only virtue and honor. And like a hen he spreads out his wings against the buzzard, the devil with his sin and death, so that God for his sake forgives all, and to us he can do no harm. But on the condition that you only remain under these wings. For while you are under his mantle and protection and do not come out from under it, sin that is still in you must not be sin for the sake of him who covers you with his righteousness.
21. Then in the second place Christ does not only thus cover and protect us, but he will also nourish and feed us as the hen does her little chickens, that is, he gives us the Holy Spirit and strength, to begin to love God and to keep his commandments. And this shall continue to the last day when faith and this cloak of shame will cease, so that we will behold the Father without any medium or covering, and we ourselves stand before him, and there will be no longer any sin in us to be forgiven; but all will be again restored and brought back or perfected, as St. Paul says in Acts 3:21, purified and perfect, what satan from the beginning disturbed and ruined.
22. Now Christ wishes to teach this by his answer and the question, with which he in reply upbraided the Pharisees. As if he should say, you know nothing more than to speak of the Law, which teaches you that you should love God and your neighbor and yet you do not understand it; for you imagine you have fulfilled it, though you are still far from doing so. Just like the one in Matthew 19:20-21, who boasts he had kept all the commandments from his youth; but Christ says to him: “If thou wouldst be perfect, go sell that which thou hast, and give to the poor.” This is as much as to say: Whoever will love God aright and keep his commandments, must be able to sacrifice his possessions, body and life. Therefore another thing is necessary, Christ will say, for you to know, namely, that you know and possess the man called Christ, who helps us to the end that this doctrine of the Law may be established and perfected in you.
23. But what does it mean to know Christ aright? This the Pharisees and scribes do not know; for they do not consider him more than David’s son, that is, he who is to sit on David’s throne (as born from his flesh and blood) and is lord and king, also greater and mightier than David was, and yet only to be a temporal ruler to make his people the lords of the world and bring all heathen under his rule, etc. But that they should need him in their lost state, to help them out of sin and death, of that they knew nothing. Therefore the Holy Spirit must teach that he was not only David’s son, but also God’s Son, as was taught after his resurrection.
24. Now here Christ does not explain this, but he only broaches that David in <19B001> Psalm 110:1, called Christ his Lord: “How then,” he says, “doth David in the Spirit call him Lord?” It does not sound right and it is against nature for a father to call his son lord, and to be subject to him and serve him. Now David calls Christ his Lord, and a Lord, to whom Jehovah himself says: “Sit thou at my right hand until I make thine enemies thy footstool,” that is, be like me, acknowledge and worshipped as the right and true God; for it becometh none other to sit at his right hand; he is indeed so jealous that he allows no one aside from himself to sit equal to him, as he says in the prophesy of Isaiah 48:11, “My glory will I not give to another.” Since Jehovah now places Christ equal with himself, he must be more than all creatures. Therefore he proposes to them a great question, but lets them thus stick; for they did not understand it and it was not yet the time to make this known public. But the meaning is as our articles of faith teach us to believe; that Christ was both David’s true natural son of his blood and flesh and also David’s Lord, whom David himself must worship and hold as God. However it was impossible to make these statements harmonize, as it is still impossible for human reason, where the Holy Spirit does not reveal it, how the two should be at the same time in the one Christ, both that he was truly David’s seed and God’s Son by nature.
25. Now Christ propounded this question to teach it is not enough to have the Law which is the only thing that shows from what state we have fallen; but whoever will return again to it and become renewed, that Christ must do through a knowledge of him, who is indeed born of David and is his flesh and blood, but not born in sin, as David and all men are born, but had to be born without man of a drop of the pure blood of a virgin, sanctified by the Holy Spirit, that he was born a real and true man without any sin.
26. He is the only man that has been able to keep and fulfill the Law; like all other men by nature, and yet not in the same guilt, but reared without sin and God’s wrath. This one had to intercede in our behalf before God and be our right hand and protection, be to us what the hen is to her little chickens, in whom we have forgiveness of sins and deliverance from God’s anger and hell. And not only this, but he also gives us the Holy Ghost to follow him, and here begins to extinguish and slay sin, until we come to him and be like him without any sin and in perfect righteousness; for he was raised from the dead to the right hand of the Father to totally abolish sin, death and hell and bring us to the new eternal righteousness and eternal life. Amen.
Labels:
Luther's Sermons,
Matthew 22:34-46
Friday, September 28, 2018
WELS College Graduate Sent X-rated Messages and Weird Photos Today
Someone did not like a post and sent a series of emails with very strange photos and x-rated comments. Yes, that is from a graduate of Martin Luther College, WELS, their School of Ministry.
The sender's address and domain are marked trash and disappear faster than beer at a WELS clergy meeting.
This has happened before, when the pastor who sent the message (no photos) begged me not to expose him.
Before doing such a thing, would it not be wise to consider whether one's place of employment approves of such behavior? I imagine that insurance companies and financial institutions frown on signed, x-rated messages with photos.
Labels:
Martin Luther College,
WELS
WELS Front Door Closed - Back Door Spring-Loaded To Open.
The Synod President Who Glories in Sewage Water Hazing Will Not Fix the Sect
Close the Front Door! Spring-Load the Back Door!
The brand new program to expand WELS must be packing the mourner's benches in each parish. I am just imagining that, since WELS copies all the worn out gimmicks. The mourner's bench was up front so people could publicly and loudly lament their sins with copious tears. But they would need a Golden Buzzer. "Hey, I was born forgiven. Pow." Golden glitter would fall as everyone cheered.WELS stands for Wisconsin Eigene Lehre Sect - Wisconsin's Peculiar Dogma Sect. The clergy's professed love for GA hazing makes them unique among the Lutheran groups. No one else celebrates looking for the pope's bowling ball in a pond full of septic drainage, only to strip completely outdoors before going inside.
Am I exaggerating? ("All he does is lie and exaggerate and slander.") At the latest call day, SP Mirthless Mark Schroeder smiled warmly about "the pond," shorthand for everyone going into the septic drainage pond to look for the pope's bowling ball. The pope I saw run a GA did his gig gay and is now the Michigan DP - District Pope.
Of all the posts that WELS loyalists loathed, the one they hated the most was the post about GA hazing and crude songs. They told each other that I published it in Christian News (not), as if to prove how they always make their case with deception.
WELS is a closed society, so the old-timers go along with the abuse. If anyone objects to the abuse and false doctrine, "he is not trying to fit in."
One example should illustrate this plainly. Ski and Bishop Katy worked together at the Jeske Crime Family Headquarters in Milwaukee (urban church, posh parsonage for the boss). Then both moved to Appleton because Glende got him a call there for The CORE, not a new church but another campus for St. Peter in Freedom. Ski and Katy were all over the US, going to Fuller style seminars. Katy quit suddenly but "there were no problems. She just wanted to do something else." Katy said so, Ski said so, Glende said so.
The next assistant to Ski quit because of his abusive behavior, but she was told to tell everyone there were no problems. Dost thou begin to smell the pot roast?
The highly sensitive, spring-loaded back door made sure than anyone who told the truth about Ski would be launched into the outer darkness and sued four ways from Sunday, if necessary. And they did. Ski, Glende, and two staffers sued the assistant's husband for telling the truth - Two WELS Pastors and Four Meritless Lawsuits.
Did anyone laugh out loud during this presentation? If so, sue their pants off. |
WELS rewarded Glende, who was also accused of abuse, by making him the speaker at the WELS Teachers' Conference.
And Ski was "popular" with his brother pastors. What better condemnation of the Anything Goes District could one find than that? Thus they featured him speaking to the youth at the local WELS high school. "Yeah, I want to grow up and be like Ski, you know, and like get away with murder. Way cool."
While WELS is melting away, because no one dares to tell the truth, the Love Shack launches another program to fix things with another coating of Public Relations whitewash.
![]() |
If you know someone who cannot spell, foward this to them. Ski is the expert - just ask him. |
Thursday, September 27, 2018
UOJ and the Resurrection, Rambach, Stephan, Walther, and Webber
Easter Absolution and Pietism < Must read
Brethren: It has been brought to my attention by an LCMS pastor friend that the doctrine of Objective Justification can also be taught under the Second Article, in the explanation of the Resurrection of Christ.
With reference to the Synodical Conference synods Catechisms prior to 1966, these were my findings when I examined the Second Article in the Catechisms (caps added:)
1912 LCMS (Schwan) Catechism, Second Article, the Resurrection of Christ, "Qu. 163: Why is the resurrection of Christ so comforting to us? A: Because it conclusive evidence,--1, That Christ is the Son of God, and that His doctrine is the truth; 2. That God the Father has accepted the sacrifice of His Son FOR THE RECONCILIATION OF THE WORLD; 3. That all believers shall rise unto eternal life."
1943 LCMS (Intersynodical) Catechism: "Qu. 152: Why is the resurrection of Christ of such importance and comfort to us? A: Christ's resurrection definitely proves--A. That Christ is the Son of God; B. That His doctrine is the truth; C. That God the Father has accepted the sacrifice of His Son for the RECONCILIATION OF THE WORLD; D. That all believers shall rise unto eternal life."
The other Catechisms when speaking of the Resurrection of Christ used terminology which indicated that the Atonement of Christ was being referred to rather than to an Objective Justification of all people, so there seems to have been a difference between the Catechisms about how to teach the benefits of the Resurrection if Christ which has continued to this day. Of the 16 different Synodical Conference synod Catechisms which I consulted, 8 apparently taught the doctrine of Objective Justification under the Second Article and 8 under the Third Article, the Forgiveness of Sins. Some Catechisms taught it under both Articles, the rest only under the Third Article. The 2017 LCMS Catechism was vague regarding both Articles.
I sincerely apologize for not having checked the Second Article before sharing my earlier findings; I have ONLY heard of Objective Justification being taught under the Third Article, and even then--as an adult convert to TALC, then the LCMS--only when I attended the Fort Wayne seminary. Prior to that I had only been taught JBFA.
A final thought: I noticed in my research that a crucial element in the teaching of Objective/Subjective Justification in the Catechisms was to "move" the IMPUTATION of Christ's righteousness from when a person is brought to faith in Christ by the Holy Spirit through the Gospel in the Means of Grace (JBFA) to the "Easter Declaration," by which God the Father justified and reconciled and forgave the whole human race at the SAME time as imputing Christ's righteousness to them. --WM
With reference to the Synodical Conference synods Catechisms prior to 1966, these were my findings when I examined the Second Article in the Catechisms (caps added:)
1912 LCMS (Schwan) Catechism, Second Article, the Resurrection of Christ, "Qu. 163: Why is the resurrection of Christ so comforting to us? A: Because it conclusive evidence,--1, That Christ is the Son of God, and that His doctrine is the truth; 2. That God the Father has accepted the sacrifice of His Son FOR THE RECONCILIATION OF THE WORLD; 3. That all believers shall rise unto eternal life."
1943 LCMS (Intersynodical) Catechism: "Qu. 152: Why is the resurrection of Christ of such importance and comfort to us? A: Christ's resurrection definitely proves--A. That Christ is the Son of God; B. That His doctrine is the truth; C. That God the Father has accepted the sacrifice of His Son for the RECONCILIATION OF THE WORLD; D. That all believers shall rise unto eternal life."
The other Catechisms when speaking of the Resurrection of Christ used terminology which indicated that the Atonement of Christ was being referred to rather than to an Objective Justification of all people, so there seems to have been a difference between the Catechisms about how to teach the benefits of the Resurrection if Christ which has continued to this day. Of the 16 different Synodical Conference synod Catechisms which I consulted, 8 apparently taught the doctrine of Objective Justification under the Second Article and 8 under the Third Article, the Forgiveness of Sins. Some Catechisms taught it under both Articles, the rest only under the Third Article. The 2017 LCMS Catechism was vague regarding both Articles.
I sincerely apologize for not having checked the Second Article before sharing my earlier findings; I have ONLY heard of Objective Justification being taught under the Third Article, and even then--as an adult convert to TALC, then the LCMS--only when I attended the Fort Wayne seminary. Prior to that I had only been taught JBFA.
A final thought: I noticed in my research that a crucial element in the teaching of Objective/Subjective Justification in the Catechisms was to "move" the IMPUTATION of Christ's righteousness from when a person is brought to faith in Christ by the Holy Spirit through the Gospel in the Means of Grace (JBFA) to the "Easter Declaration," by which God the Father justified and reconciled and forgave the whole human race at the SAME time as imputing Christ's righteousness to them. --WM
Links from the Small Catechism Quotations Here.
Gideon - And Many Others - Appreciate the Catechism Data.
Pastor Jackson,
After reading the survey of catechism texts, I was reminded that these are actually facts not mere opinions that demonstrate the shift of American Lutheranism since the 19th century.
There it is. Makes me feel like a Catholic— or maybe marginally better than one.
Indeed, what one sees when studying the change through the decades is a microcosm of the theological shift in the Catholic Church herself through her first 1500 years.
You don’t want to believe it, but there it is. The TRUTH never changes, but institutions do.
SDG,
Gideon
Links to Historic Small Catechism Quotations
Labels:
Gideon,
Justification by Faith,
Small Catechism,
UOJ
Moving the Big Leafy Weeds, Planting Bubls, Logrolling
When people order bulbs, they are looking at colorful, glossy photos of the flowers, not at shovels to be employed in digging them in.
I ordered some for us, Ranger Bob, and our lawn crew. So Bob showed up with bags of additional bulbs - oh, my aching back.
But first we had fun digging up a double stand of Wild Ginger Hidden Lily, which I call Big Leafy Weeds. They have a lot of appeal, because I got them on sale for almost nothing, and they multiply like Canna. The best part - they are cold hardy. I gave some to the lawn crew, some to the dentist's wife, and I still had more than I first planted. I am using them for green fencing now.
Earlier, I brought the Cinnabon shrub (Summersweet - Clethra) to the rose garden, leaving gaps in the bird feeding area. We adopted the two craters for the BLWs. The tall plants will thrive and multiply with watering. Another bonus - they were easy to dig up. They also seem useful along the western fence, where I would like more growth but not a lot of bending, stooping, weeding, etc.
After stalling with the BLWs, we attacked a promising spot in the front of the rose garden. Promised rain had not arrived - twice, but we had a fairly damp clay area to dig up. We dug and cleared a wide hole about six inches deep.
I opened the box for various bulbs:
- Daffodils - colorful, yukky to animals, multiplying in time.
- Iris - interesting, but I do not buy them myself.
- Hyacinth - expensive and good for one year of good blooms. Why? They are fragrant so I planted them.
- Crocus - I gave up on them because squirrels love them, dig them and replant them. They come up in the strangest places.
We ran out of back muscle but not bulbs. I get to select and soften a spot for our next attempt. Blooming bulbs are great fun and represent an investment in time and muscles. Several times people have stopped to tell me how much they enjoyed the spring display.
Our helper laughed with me about the dead Chaste Tree that is currently leafing out like it is spring.
Ranger Bob had me come over and give his roses Milky Spore, to kill off Japanese Beetles. That natural cure increases in value as the grubs die and spread the disease, which only hurts white grubs.
I was happy to receive some giant Alium (garlic) bulbs from Bob. His brother Mike came over to help load logs into the truck. I have conceded that the lumber got in the way in the garden. I noticed the soil creatures really ate into them, so I harvested bark to use as mulch. Bark also serves as potential toad shade.
Our helper laughed with me about the dead Chaste Tree that is currently leafing out like it is spring.
Ranger Bob had me come over and give his roses Milky Spore, to kill off Japanese Beetles. That natural cure increases in value as the grubs die and spread the disease, which only hurts white grubs.
I was happy to receive some giant Alium (garlic) bulbs from Bob. His brother Mike came over to help load logs into the truck. I have conceded that the lumber got in the way in the garden. I noticed the soil creatures really ate into them, so I harvested bark to use as mulch. Bark also serves as potential toad shade.
Labels:
Creation Gardening,
fall bulbs
Wednesday, September 26, 2018
More Shocking Revelations about the Antiquity of OJ in the Synodical Conference
First of all, a correction: The Foreward to the 1966 ELS CATECHISM says that the text of the previous ELS Catechism was from 1905, not 1906 as I had said. The 1966 Foreward says that it has been
"61 years" since the previous ELS Catechism, which I previously quoted as teaching JBFA.
In the following passages one will be able to note how the Synodical Conference synods Catechisms from 1966 to the present have consistently taught UOJ, whether or not they actually use the terms "Objection/General Justification" or "Subjective/Personal Justification."
Ironically, the Norwegian Synod/ELS English Language Catechism of 1905 was the first English language Synodical Conference synod Catechism, and it clearly taught JBFA; the 1966 ELS CATECHISM was the first English language Synodical Conference synod Catechism to teach OJ/SJ.
[GJ - I believe this is the heart of the Madison (Opgjoer) Settlement issue. The Pieper OJ crowd want to be pure OJ, not OJ and JBFA. So the ELS marched off and took 1,000 OJ people from the Norwegian Synod to become the ELS or "Little Norwegians", a term they loathe. The Norwegian Preus clan adhered to OJ, so they imagined that made them orthodox rather than Pietistic. So when Jack and Bob Preus got fed up at Luther seminary, off to the ELS.]
All the following quotations will be taken from the Explanation of the Third Article, the Forgiveness of Sins of the different Catechisms; Bible passages are omitted:
AN EXPLANATION OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER'S SMALL CATECHISM (ELS) 1966. "Qu. 254: How were you justified? A: I was justified by God the Father, when by His grace He DECLARED ME RIGHTEOUS. Qu. 255: How can God declare the sinner righteous? A: God can declare the sinner righteous because, on the basis of the redemptive work of Christ, He has ACQUITTED ALL MEN of the guilt and punishment of their sins, and has imputed to them the righteousness of Christ; HE THEREFORE REGARDS THEM IN CHRIST AS THOUGH THEY HAD NEVER SINNED. Qu. 256: How does the sinner receive this justification? A: The sinner receives this justification when the Holy Ghost, through the means of grace, leads him to believe that God has forgiven all his sins for Christ's sake. [Note: Throughout these passages it will be noted that the teaching of "Subjective Justification" BY ITSELF is acceptable, but NOT when joined to the teaching of Objective Justification.]
AN EXPLANATION OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER'S SMALL CATECHISM (ELS) 1981. "Qu. 206: Why do you "believe in the forgiveness of sins:? A: I believe in the forgiveness of sins because the Bible assures me that God the Father has by grace FORGIVEN ALL SINNERS AND DECLARED THEM RIGHTEOUS. 207: How can God declare sinners righteous? A: God can declare sinners righteous because, on the basis of the redemptive work of Christ, He has ACQUITTED ALL MEN OF THE GUILT AND PUNISHMENT OF THEIR SINS, AND HAS IMPUTED TO THEM THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF CHRIST; HE THEREFORE REGARDS THEM IN CHRIST AS THOUGH THEY HAD NEVER SINNED (GENERAL OR OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION.) Qu. 208: How do you receive this forgiveness or justification? A: I receive this justification when the Holy Ghost through the means of grace leads me, the sinner, to believe that God has forgiven all my sins for Christ's sake (PERSONAL OR SUBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION.)"
CATECHISM LESSONS PUPIL'S BOOK by Adolph F. Fehlauer (WELS) 1981. "Lesson 49. Forgiveness of Sins/The Third Article [I believe in] the forgiveness of sins. What does this mean? [I believe that in the Christian church the Holy Ghost] daily and fully forgives all sins to ME AND ALL BELIEVERS {Note: JBFA!!! Then, note the teaching of OJ/SJ following:]...What did Jesus earn for all people? Jesus earned forgiveness for all people. On whom did Jesus put the sins of all people. (A. On Jesus) God accepted Jesus' sacrifice for the sins of the world. What did God do for all people? (A. HE DECLARES THEM RIGHTEOUS.) For whose sake does God declare ALL PEOPLE RIGHTEOUS? GOD DECLARES THAT ALL PEOPLE ARE RIGHTEOUS FOR JESUS' SAKE. What good news did Jesus tell the paralytic man? (A. That his sins were forgiven) What word do we use for the good news of forgiveness of sins? (A. Gospel) What does God offer through the Gospel? Through the Gospel God offers forgiveness of sins. Not all people accept this free offer of forgiveness. Why didn't the Pharisee ask for mercy and forgiveness? (A. He believed that he was just and needed no forgiveness.) Why did the tax collector pray God to have mercy on him? (A. He knew that he was a sinner and believed that God would forgive him his sins.) Who gives us faith to believe in the forgiveness of sins? The good news of forgiveness through faith is proclaimed in the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Who gives us faith to believe the Gospel? The Holy Spirit gives us faith to believe the Gospel. Summary: Jesus earned forgiveness of sins for all people. GOD DECLARES ALL PEOPLE RIGHTEOUS FOR JESUS' SAKE. Through the Gospel God offers forgiveness of sins. The Holy Spirit gives us faith to believe the Gospel. We receive forgiveness through faith in the Gospel. What this means to me: In the Bible God tells me that all my sins are forgiven for Jesus' sake. He is my holy and righteous Savior. God looks upon Jesus' righteousness as my righteousness, and therefore He declares me just and holy (justified). There is nothing I can do to earn my forgiveness and salvation. Jesus has done all that can be done and need be done. But in return for Jesus' love and God's mercy I will want to show my appreciation by thinking, praising, serving, and obeying my merciful Lord and Savior..."
LUTHER'S CATECHISM by David P. Kuske (WELS) 1982. "Qu. 253: How many people did GOD DECLARE RIGHTEOUS? A: GOD DECLARED ALL PEOPLE RIGHTEOUS. (OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION)...Qu. 255: Why is it important, then, that the Holy Spirit work faith in me? A: It is important that the Holy Spirit work faith in me so that I do not trust in my own works but only in the righteousness God gives by grace in Christ.
(SUBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION)"
MARTIN LUTHER'S SMALL CATECHISM: A HANDBOOK OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE by Pastor Mike Sydow (CLC) 1988. "Qu. 208: Whom has God justified--declared 'Not guilty'? A: GOD DECLARED ALL PEOPLE IN ALL THE WORLD 'NOT GUILTY' OF THEIR SINS. THIS IS SOMETIMES CALLED UNIVERSAL JUSTIFICATION (OR OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION) For Personal Justification, cf. question 210...Qu. 210: How do the benefits of Christ's death become our own? A: The Holy Spirit provides the benefits of Christ's death by giving people faith. THIS IS SOMETIMES CALLED PERSONAL JUSTIFICATION (OR SUBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION). Personal justification is believing that God has declared me 'Not guilty.'" [Note: Same text in 2000 and 2006 (current) editions.]
LUTHER'S SMALL CATECHISM WITH EXPLANATION (LCMS) 1991. "Qu. 180: Why do you say, 'i believe in the forgiveness of sins'? A: I believe in the forgiveness of sins because through Christ God has DECLARED PARDON AND FORGIVENESS TO ALL SINFUL HUMANITY...Qu. 182. How is it possible for a just and holy God to declare sinners righteous (justification)? A: GOD DECLARES SINNERS RIGHTEOUS FOR CHRIST'S SAKE, THAT IS, OUR SINS HAVE BEEN IMPUTED OR CHARGED TO CHRIST, THE SAVIOR, AND CHRIST'S RIGHTEOUSNESS HAS BEEN IMPUTED OR CREDITED TO US. Qu. 183: Where does God offer the forgiveness of sins?
A: God offers the forgiveness of sins in the Gospel. Qu. 184: How do you receive this forgiveness of sins? A: I receive this forgiveness through faith, that is, by believing the Gospel." (Note: Does this sound similar to the 1981 ELS Catechism, but without the use of the terms "OJ/SJ"?) (Same explanation in both 1991 LCMS Catechism with the NIV and the 2005 LCMS Catechism with the ESV.)
AN EXPLANATION OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER'S SMALL CATECHISM (ELS) 2001: (Note: "Qu. 210-212" are virtually the same as the 1981 ELS Catechism "Qu. 206-208." 2018 edition of 2001 ELS Catechism using the WELS/ELS Wartburg Project's Evangelical Heritage Version translation has identical Explanation to the 2001 ELS Catechism.)
LUTHER'S CATECHISM: THE SMALL CATECHISM OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER (WELS) 2017: "Qu. 218: What did our gracious God do to overturn the judgement against our sin? A: GOD RECONCILED THE WHOLE WORLD TO HIMSELF, THAT IS, HE DECLARED THE WHOLE WORLD NOT GUILTY. Qu. 219: How is it possible that God, who is holy and just, would declare sinners righteous? A: GOD CAN DECLARE SINNERS RIGHTEOUS without violating his justice because he declared Jesus to be guilty of every sin that has ever been or will ever be committed. God made the only one who was without sin to be sin for us. On the cross, Jesus was punished for every sin. BECAUSE OF THE CROSS, THE ENTIRE WORLD HAS BEEN DECLARED TO BE NOT GUILTY. THIS IS TRUE, NOT BECAUSE PEOPLE BELIEVE IT BUT BECAUSE IT TRULY HAPPENED (UNIVERSAL/OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION)...Qu. 222: How do we receive the forgiveness of sins that God DECLARED FOR ALL PEOPLE? A: We receive the benefits of what CHRIST DID FOR THE WORLD when the Holy Spirit works the gift of faith in our hearts. WE BELIEVE THE OBJECTIVE TRUTH, THAT GOD HAS DECLARED THE WHOLE WORLD JUSTIFIED BECAUSE OF JESUS' SACRIFICE. THE PERSONAL POSSESSION OF FORGIVENESS BY FAITH IN JESUS IS CALLED SUBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION."
LUTHER'S SMALL CATECHISM WITH EXPLANATION (LCMS) 2017: (Note: As with the 1991 and 2001 ELS Catechisms, the 1991 and 2017 LCMS Catechisms are very similar, not using the terms "OJ/SJ," but whereas the 1991 LCMS Catechism says in Qu. 180 "God HAS DECLARED..." the 2017 LCMS Catechism says in Qu. 206 "God DECLARES..."
This 2017 LCMS edition of the Small Catechism frequently quotes from the Lutheran Confessions, the only English language Synodical Conference synod Catechism to do so since the J.C. Dietrich Small Catechism, printed by CPH for the LCMS. However, when a quotation is given to support the teaching of the Forgiveness of Sins in the 2017 LCMS Catechism, the quotation which is given is FC Ep III:4, which says (LCMS CONCORDIA Edition, p. 480) "Our righteousness before God is this: God forgives our sins out of pure grace, without any work, merit, or worthiness of ours preceding, present, or following. He presents and credits to us the righteousness of Christ's obedience [Romans 5:17-19]. Because of this righteousness we are received into grace by God and regarded as righteous." What is NOT quoted is what DIRECTLY FOLLOWS in FC Ep III:5: "3. WE BELIEVE, TEACH AND CONFESS THAT FAITH ALONE IS THE MEANS AND INSTRUMENT THROUGH WHICH WE LAY HOLD OF CHRIST. So in Christ we lay hold of that righteousness that benefits us before God [Romans 1:17], FOR WHOSE SAKE THIS FAITH IS CREDITED TO US FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS (Romans 4:5)."
In summary: Before 1966 no Synodical Conference synod Catechism taught Objective/Subjective Justification. That changed with the ELS Catechism of 1966. The 1981 ELS Catechism influenced the 1991/2017 LCMS Catechisms as well as the 2001 (current) ELS Catechism. The WELS Catechisms have been the most open in teaching Objective/Subjective Justification.
You've all heard of the fact that Mormons have to go to their "temples" for certain "ordinances" which teach "secrets" kept from both the "Gentiles" and other Mormons who haven't been to the "temple" themselves, thus creating a "dual Mormon membership," some of whom learn the "secrets" while others don't, and those who don't can't progress to "godhood" without "temple ordinances." Why is it that the Synodical Conference synods taught Objective/Subjective Justification through their English language college and seminary doctrinal theology texts (e.g., A. Graebner, Th. Engelder, J.T. Mueller, EWA Koehler, F. Pieper ) since 1910 (and in their German and Latin language texts before 1910,) but only in their Catechisms for their laity and their children since 1966, if OJ/SJ is such a precious, necessary doctrine to know? --Warren
"61 years" since the previous ELS Catechism, which I previously quoted as teaching JBFA.
In the following passages one will be able to note how the Synodical Conference synods Catechisms from 1966 to the present have consistently taught UOJ, whether or not they actually use the terms "Objection/General Justification" or "Subjective/Personal Justification."
Ironically, the Norwegian Synod/ELS English Language Catechism of 1905 was the first English language Synodical Conference synod Catechism, and it clearly taught JBFA; the 1966 ELS CATECHISM was the first English language Synodical Conference synod Catechism to teach OJ/SJ.
[GJ - I believe this is the heart of the Madison (Opgjoer) Settlement issue. The Pieper OJ crowd want to be pure OJ, not OJ and JBFA. So the ELS marched off and took 1,000 OJ people from the Norwegian Synod to become the ELS or "Little Norwegians", a term they loathe. The Norwegian Preus clan adhered to OJ, so they imagined that made them orthodox rather than Pietistic. So when Jack and Bob Preus got fed up at Luther seminary, off to the ELS.]
All the following quotations will be taken from the Explanation of the Third Article, the Forgiveness of Sins of the different Catechisms; Bible passages are omitted:
AN EXPLANATION OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER'S SMALL CATECHISM (ELS) 1966. "Qu. 254: How were you justified? A: I was justified by God the Father, when by His grace He DECLARED ME RIGHTEOUS. Qu. 255: How can God declare the sinner righteous? A: God can declare the sinner righteous because, on the basis of the redemptive work of Christ, He has ACQUITTED ALL MEN of the guilt and punishment of their sins, and has imputed to them the righteousness of Christ; HE THEREFORE REGARDS THEM IN CHRIST AS THOUGH THEY HAD NEVER SINNED. Qu. 256: How does the sinner receive this justification? A: The sinner receives this justification when the Holy Ghost, through the means of grace, leads him to believe that God has forgiven all his sins for Christ's sake. [Note: Throughout these passages it will be noted that the teaching of "Subjective Justification" BY ITSELF is acceptable, but NOT when joined to the teaching of Objective Justification.]
AN EXPLANATION OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER'S SMALL CATECHISM (ELS) 1981. "Qu. 206: Why do you "believe in the forgiveness of sins:? A: I believe in the forgiveness of sins because the Bible assures me that God the Father has by grace FORGIVEN ALL SINNERS AND DECLARED THEM RIGHTEOUS. 207: How can God declare sinners righteous? A: God can declare sinners righteous because, on the basis of the redemptive work of Christ, He has ACQUITTED ALL MEN OF THE GUILT AND PUNISHMENT OF THEIR SINS, AND HAS IMPUTED TO THEM THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF CHRIST; HE THEREFORE REGARDS THEM IN CHRIST AS THOUGH THEY HAD NEVER SINNED (GENERAL OR OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION.) Qu. 208: How do you receive this forgiveness or justification? A: I receive this justification when the Holy Ghost through the means of grace leads me, the sinner, to believe that God has forgiven all my sins for Christ's sake (PERSONAL OR SUBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION.)"
CATECHISM LESSONS PUPIL'S BOOK by Adolph F. Fehlauer (WELS) 1981. "Lesson 49. Forgiveness of Sins/The Third Article [I believe in] the forgiveness of sins. What does this mean? [I believe that in the Christian church the Holy Ghost] daily and fully forgives all sins to ME AND ALL BELIEVERS {Note: JBFA!!! Then, note the teaching of OJ/SJ following:]...What did Jesus earn for all people? Jesus earned forgiveness for all people. On whom did Jesus put the sins of all people. (A. On Jesus) God accepted Jesus' sacrifice for the sins of the world. What did God do for all people? (A. HE DECLARES THEM RIGHTEOUS.) For whose sake does God declare ALL PEOPLE RIGHTEOUS? GOD DECLARES THAT ALL PEOPLE ARE RIGHTEOUS FOR JESUS' SAKE. What good news did Jesus tell the paralytic man? (A. That his sins were forgiven) What word do we use for the good news of forgiveness of sins? (A. Gospel) What does God offer through the Gospel? Through the Gospel God offers forgiveness of sins. Not all people accept this free offer of forgiveness. Why didn't the Pharisee ask for mercy and forgiveness? (A. He believed that he was just and needed no forgiveness.) Why did the tax collector pray God to have mercy on him? (A. He knew that he was a sinner and believed that God would forgive him his sins.) Who gives us faith to believe in the forgiveness of sins? The good news of forgiveness through faith is proclaimed in the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Who gives us faith to believe the Gospel? The Holy Spirit gives us faith to believe the Gospel. Summary: Jesus earned forgiveness of sins for all people. GOD DECLARES ALL PEOPLE RIGHTEOUS FOR JESUS' SAKE. Through the Gospel God offers forgiveness of sins. The Holy Spirit gives us faith to believe the Gospel. We receive forgiveness through faith in the Gospel. What this means to me: In the Bible God tells me that all my sins are forgiven for Jesus' sake. He is my holy and righteous Savior. God looks upon Jesus' righteousness as my righteousness, and therefore He declares me just and holy (justified). There is nothing I can do to earn my forgiveness and salvation. Jesus has done all that can be done and need be done. But in return for Jesus' love and God's mercy I will want to show my appreciation by thinking, praising, serving, and obeying my merciful Lord and Savior..."
LUTHER'S CATECHISM by David P. Kuske (WELS) 1982. "Qu. 253: How many people did GOD DECLARE RIGHTEOUS? A: GOD DECLARED ALL PEOPLE RIGHTEOUS. (OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION)...Qu. 255: Why is it important, then, that the Holy Spirit work faith in me? A: It is important that the Holy Spirit work faith in me so that I do not trust in my own works but only in the righteousness God gives by grace in Christ.
(SUBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION)"
MARTIN LUTHER'S SMALL CATECHISM: A HANDBOOK OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE by Pastor Mike Sydow (CLC) 1988. "Qu. 208: Whom has God justified--declared 'Not guilty'? A: GOD DECLARED ALL PEOPLE IN ALL THE WORLD 'NOT GUILTY' OF THEIR SINS. THIS IS SOMETIMES CALLED UNIVERSAL JUSTIFICATION (OR OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION) For Personal Justification, cf. question 210...Qu. 210: How do the benefits of Christ's death become our own? A: The Holy Spirit provides the benefits of Christ's death by giving people faith. THIS IS SOMETIMES CALLED PERSONAL JUSTIFICATION (OR SUBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION). Personal justification is believing that God has declared me 'Not guilty.'" [Note: Same text in 2000 and 2006 (current) editions.]
LUTHER'S SMALL CATECHISM WITH EXPLANATION (LCMS) 1991. "Qu. 180: Why do you say, 'i believe in the forgiveness of sins'? A: I believe in the forgiveness of sins because through Christ God has DECLARED PARDON AND FORGIVENESS TO ALL SINFUL HUMANITY...Qu. 182. How is it possible for a just and holy God to declare sinners righteous (justification)? A: GOD DECLARES SINNERS RIGHTEOUS FOR CHRIST'S SAKE, THAT IS, OUR SINS HAVE BEEN IMPUTED OR CHARGED TO CHRIST, THE SAVIOR, AND CHRIST'S RIGHTEOUSNESS HAS BEEN IMPUTED OR CREDITED TO US. Qu. 183: Where does God offer the forgiveness of sins?
A: God offers the forgiveness of sins in the Gospel. Qu. 184: How do you receive this forgiveness of sins? A: I receive this forgiveness through faith, that is, by believing the Gospel." (Note: Does this sound similar to the 1981 ELS Catechism, but without the use of the terms "OJ/SJ"?) (Same explanation in both 1991 LCMS Catechism with the NIV and the 2005 LCMS Catechism with the ESV.)
AN EXPLANATION OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER'S SMALL CATECHISM (ELS) 2001: (Note: "Qu. 210-212" are virtually the same as the 1981 ELS Catechism "Qu. 206-208." 2018 edition of 2001 ELS Catechism using the WELS/ELS Wartburg Project's Evangelical Heritage Version translation has identical Explanation to the 2001 ELS Catechism.)
LUTHER'S CATECHISM: THE SMALL CATECHISM OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER (WELS) 2017: "Qu. 218: What did our gracious God do to overturn the judgement against our sin? A: GOD RECONCILED THE WHOLE WORLD TO HIMSELF, THAT IS, HE DECLARED THE WHOLE WORLD NOT GUILTY. Qu. 219: How is it possible that God, who is holy and just, would declare sinners righteous? A: GOD CAN DECLARE SINNERS RIGHTEOUS without violating his justice because he declared Jesus to be guilty of every sin that has ever been or will ever be committed. God made the only one who was without sin to be sin for us. On the cross, Jesus was punished for every sin. BECAUSE OF THE CROSS, THE ENTIRE WORLD HAS BEEN DECLARED TO BE NOT GUILTY. THIS IS TRUE, NOT BECAUSE PEOPLE BELIEVE IT BUT BECAUSE IT TRULY HAPPENED (UNIVERSAL/OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION)...Qu. 222: How do we receive the forgiveness of sins that God DECLARED FOR ALL PEOPLE? A: We receive the benefits of what CHRIST DID FOR THE WORLD when the Holy Spirit works the gift of faith in our hearts. WE BELIEVE THE OBJECTIVE TRUTH, THAT GOD HAS DECLARED THE WHOLE WORLD JUSTIFIED BECAUSE OF JESUS' SACRIFICE. THE PERSONAL POSSESSION OF FORGIVENESS BY FAITH IN JESUS IS CALLED SUBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION."
LUTHER'S SMALL CATECHISM WITH EXPLANATION (LCMS) 2017: (Note: As with the 1991 and 2001 ELS Catechisms, the 1991 and 2017 LCMS Catechisms are very similar, not using the terms "OJ/SJ," but whereas the 1991 LCMS Catechism says in Qu. 180 "God HAS DECLARED..." the 2017 LCMS Catechism says in Qu. 206 "God DECLARES..."
This 2017 LCMS edition of the Small Catechism frequently quotes from the Lutheran Confessions, the only English language Synodical Conference synod Catechism to do so since the J.C. Dietrich Small Catechism, printed by CPH for the LCMS. However, when a quotation is given to support the teaching of the Forgiveness of Sins in the 2017 LCMS Catechism, the quotation which is given is FC Ep III:4, which says (LCMS CONCORDIA Edition, p. 480) "Our righteousness before God is this: God forgives our sins out of pure grace, without any work, merit, or worthiness of ours preceding, present, or following. He presents and credits to us the righteousness of Christ's obedience [Romans 5:17-19]. Because of this righteousness we are received into grace by God and regarded as righteous." What is NOT quoted is what DIRECTLY FOLLOWS in FC Ep III:5: "3. WE BELIEVE, TEACH AND CONFESS THAT FAITH ALONE IS THE MEANS AND INSTRUMENT THROUGH WHICH WE LAY HOLD OF CHRIST. So in Christ we lay hold of that righteousness that benefits us before God [Romans 1:17], FOR WHOSE SAKE THIS FAITH IS CREDITED TO US FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS (Romans 4:5)."
In summary: Before 1966 no Synodical Conference synod Catechism taught Objective/Subjective Justification. That changed with the ELS Catechism of 1966. The 1981 ELS Catechism influenced the 1991/2017 LCMS Catechisms as well as the 2001 (current) ELS Catechism. The WELS Catechisms have been the most open in teaching Objective/Subjective Justification.
You've all heard of the fact that Mormons have to go to their "temples" for certain "ordinances" which teach "secrets" kept from both the "Gentiles" and other Mormons who haven't been to the "temple" themselves, thus creating a "dual Mormon membership," some of whom learn the "secrets" while others don't, and those who don't can't progress to "godhood" without "temple ordinances." Why is it that the Synodical Conference synods taught Objective/Subjective Justification through their English language college and seminary doctrinal theology texts (e.g., A. Graebner, Th. Engelder, J.T. Mueller, EWA Koehler, F. Pieper ) since 1910 (and in their German and Latin language texts before 1910,) but only in their Catechisms for their laity and their children since 1966, if OJ/SJ is such a precious, necessary doctrine to know? --Warren
Labels:
LCMS UOJ Preus
WELS - Will My Grandchildren Have a Place To Worship the Synod?
![]() |
Together, they destroyed more congregations than the Chicago Fire, but they made a lot of money doing it. Give them that much. |
The WELS money-grubbing letter from Jonathan Hein is a hoot, to paraphrase Steve Spencer. Ever since the sect embraced the Church Shrinkage Movement (now called Attritional), they have lost members faster than Sears has lost customers. What have they done in response? The sect has pumped up the volume of praise bands, pipe organ bashing, sermonless rants, and munchies during the sneaker service (imitating that prince of a man, Hybels, Willow Creek).
Mirthless Mark Schroeder went to Appleton to bail out Ski, as Engelbrecht bragged in writing. However, I was the cause of all the troubles in the Anything Goes District. Did I write and post the infamous Ski sermon? Ha. |
Let us pause to consider the pastoral care offered by Glende and Ski at St. Peter in Freedom, Wisconsin. When a long-standing member challenged them correctly about their plagiarized sermons, the DP backed up the Booze Brothers and Glende/Ski excommunicated the member. Open the back door - extend the Left Foot of Fellowship.
They were so full of themselves and the suds that they drove one staff member after another away - one pastor after a few months, Bishop Katy, and then the woman whose husband they sued four ways from Sunday. That was Glende's genius in Illinois, bullying members so he could get what he wanted. That is another WELS congregation closed instead of serving a university population. No one will say that, because the Boy Wonder is Brug's nephew.
That is just a microcosm of the abusive sect. The slander tossed at the Kavanaugh family now is a nice sample of what WELS clergy, DPs, and SP do when crossed. Do you think the evil lies against the judge are bad? WELS does the same to their workers, the families of the workers, and even the extended families. But it all depends, of course. If someone is from the right family, he can do no wrong and gets another call. If he knows the right people, the same is true. But the vast majority are treated like plantation slaves and cringe at the voice of the DP.
![]() |
Katy Perry lights the dreams of the Booze Brothers. |
The WELS Tetzel says it is up to the congregations to increase in size. Pardon me while I reach for my oxygen hose. Laughing this hard makes my lips turn blue. This wonderful solution comes from the sect that has:
- Abandoned and repudiated Justification by Faith.
- Promoted the evil, false NIV on its members and publications.
- Choked the traditional liturgy to death.
- Mocked the Book of Concord while devilishly posing as Quia Marias in public.
- Allowed the Mark Jeske Crime Family to run the synod without being elected, skimming money from all the funds to lubricate their ELCA-centric agenda.
- Welcomed the Odd Couple Ministry of Starr, Barefoot, and the Boys in the Band.
- Driven away faithful members and workers.
- Absolved felons (murder, child sex trafficking, love letters to children).
- Wasted money at Fuller Seminary, Trinity Divinity, and Willow Creek.
- Squandered the Schwan money, just as furiously as the MilCraft estate was ruined (which was the estate's fault, doncha know).
- Looked the other way when all the clergy and teachers were being trained that the only path to success was in following the anti-Lutheran, feminist, mainline growth hives. Management by Objectives - that is the cure - not the efficacious Word in the Means of Grace.
- Pretended to be awash in the Gospel when really legalistic, self-centered bullies of the worst kind, even when sober.
Jonathan Hein: "Open the front door and shut the back door."
I am helpless with laughter. When I confronted DP Bob Mueller about his anti-Scriptural reign, he said angrily, "If you don't like it, leave." The solution in WELS is never to face their failure to follow the Scriptures and Confessions. No, "in our circles, orthodoxy means whatever we say it means." When they say "Write a letter," they mean, "Please take the first step in being excommuncated."
![]() |
Sadler - his graphic. Belch. Alcoholism is a career enhancer in WELS. |
"We have a program."
Has anyone heard that before? The Babtists always have a program of sanctification. This is going to cost a lot of money, I am sure.
"This is not about WELS. This is about souls."
They were soooo concerned, they let a healthy congregation in Illinois be ruined by Tim Glende, and he urged everyone to close the parish after he abandoned it - so everyone could forget.
"We need your prayers, your service, and your moolah."
WELS had the biggest charitable gift ever, the Schwan Foundation, gushing all kinds of money. The bosses hired their buddies and doubled the staff at the Love Shack. They spent money like Congressmen and the results were even worse.
The WELS executives get the highest salaries and benefits, doing the least work in the Means of Grace.
Mordor in Mequon does not have a single Lutheran professor.
![]() |
Martin Luther College - looking for a few good men, cuz "We make a good man better." |
Martin Luther College is openly LBTQ, but shhh, do not tell anyone. They have to be, to get their gubmint money. It too is failing, shrinking, but still staggeringly expensive.
![]() |
WELS/ELS could not get enough of this genius. They love adulterous false teachers. |
Labels:
Becoming Missional,
Church Growth Movement,
Glende,
Jonathan Hein,
Mark Schroeder,
New NIV,
SKi,
WELS
From the Secure, Undisclosed Warren of the Ichabunker
![]() |
Martin Chemnitz, like Luther and the Concordists, considered themselves Theologians of the Augsburg Confession. |
I just received from CPH my copy of the newly-published translation of the APOLOGY OF THE BOOK OF CONCORD from 1583, which defends the teachings of the BOOK OF CONCORD of 1580. It was written by Martin Chemnitz and Nicolaus Selnecker (two of the
six authors of the FORMULA OF CONCORD) and by Timothy Kirchner.
The APOLOGY was primarily directed against the Reformed Church's rejection of the Scriptural doctrines of the Two Natures of Christ and of the Real Presence of Christ in the
Sacrament of the Altar, and therefore it does not deal directly with the doctrine of the Justification by Faith Alone.
However, on page 428 of the APOLOGY I did find this confirmation of the precious doctrine of Justification by Faith Alone with the citation of John 3:16 against the Reformed doctrine of Election apart from faith (caps added):
"We are also not unaware that all who are truly repentant are elect and that such people certainly ought to conclude that they are elect and the children of God in and through Christ ON WHOM THEY BELIEVE. Whomever God GIVES ETERNAL LIFE THROUGH FAITH (John 3 [:16]) must certainly be elect and God's dear child. We also know that the question about salvation does not begin with the question about eternal election. Rather, we follow the order of St. Paul in his letter to the Romans, where he first leads us to repentance or the knowledge of sins, then to FAITH IN CHRIST, then to the cross and suffering; then, when we have studied in this school for a while and have been tested and humbled under the cross and all kinds of temptations, we ourselves find how useful and beneficial it is that we are elected in Christ to eternal life and that no creature can separate us from His hands (Romans 8[:38-39])."
The APOLOGY was primarily directed against the Reformed Church's rejection of the Scriptural doctrines of the Two Natures of Christ and of the Real Presence of Christ in the
Sacrament of the Altar, and therefore it does not deal directly with the doctrine of the Justification by Faith Alone.
However, on page 428 of the APOLOGY I did find this confirmation of the precious doctrine of Justification by Faith Alone with the citation of John 3:16 against the Reformed doctrine of Election apart from faith (caps added):
"We are also not unaware that all who are truly repentant are elect and that such people certainly ought to conclude that they are elect and the children of God in and through Christ ON WHOM THEY BELIEVE. Whomever God GIVES ETERNAL LIFE THROUGH FAITH (John 3 [:16]) must certainly be elect and God's dear child. We also know that the question about salvation does not begin with the question about eternal election. Rather, we follow the order of St. Paul in his letter to the Romans, where he first leads us to repentance or the knowledge of sins, then to FAITH IN CHRIST, then to the cross and suffering; then, when we have studied in this school for a while and have been tested and humbled under the cross and all kinds of temptations, we ourselves find how useful and beneficial it is that we are elected in Christ to eternal life and that no creature can separate us from His hands (Romans 8[:38-39])."
Labels:
Apology of the Book of Concord,
Chemnitz,
Selnecker
From the Research Arm of Team Ichabod - Loehe Small Catechism
Loehe Small Catechism quotations
278) Where do you find a description of Creation?
In the first two chapters of the Bible.
279) In how many days did God make heaven and earth?
In six days.
![]() |
I am so impressed with the loyalty of so many Dead Last Lutherans, who imitate their idol CFW Walther in covering up for gross clergy sexual abuse of members, collecting their rewards for that malfeasance, moving along praising themselves, world without end. Some of them are Roman Catholic; some of them are not. Not one is a Lutheran, according to Loehe's standards. |
![]() |
Scheer madness. |
418) And which is the true Church?
That which teaches and confesses God’s Word purely, and administers the Sacraments according to the institution of Christ. John 8:31; 10:27.
419) What Church does this?
The so-called Lutheran church, to which therefore the titles Christian and Apostolic belong especially.
420) How can you find out what the Lutheran Church teaches?
From her confessions, which no Lutheran preacher dare contradict.
421) What are those Confessions?
The three General Creeds, the Augsburg Confession and the Apology, the Schmalkald Articles, the two Catechisms of Luther, and the Formula of Concord. They are all printed together in the Book of Concord, published in
1580)
43) What may
be the meaning of the two tables of the Law?
The human heart, in
which the commandments of God ought to be written.
44) What may
be the meaning of the first tables, which God Himself made?
The human heart, as
it was created by God.
45) And of
the tables which Moses made?
The human heart, as
it was made by man through his fall.
Reminds me of
Ezekiel:
And I will give them
one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will
take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an
heart of flesh: Eze 11:19
***
GJ
The Watherians and their thralls would have us believe that CFW is the standard of Lutheran orthodoxy, but they clearly oppose and repudiate the Biblical doctrine of Justification by Faith, replacing it with the faddish Objective Justification of rationalistic Pietism. These pompous blowhards hate each other and get along like Calvinist factions (which they are), not only ignorant of the true Gospel but archenemies of it.
Labels:
Book of Concord,
CFW Walther,
Loehe,
Steadfast Lutherans
Tim Glende Keeps Moving On - New Call to Iowa.
Hasn't Iowa Suffered Enough?
![]() |
Tim Glende created a healthy and happy Eastern Orthodox congregation, by selling his paid-for building and shopping for one that matched his ego. |
![]() |
Pastor Mike is both the new Ski and the new Jeske at Time of Grace. |
The Booze Brothers launched four lawsuits against one of their victims - linked is the report from the lawyer they excommunicated for telling the truth about their plagiarism.
Call Report – September 24, 2018
Rev Timothy Glende | St Peter LC – North Campus Appleton WI | Good Shepherd LC Cedar Rapids IA Pastor | 9/23/2018 |
![]() |
Synod President Mark Schroeder, DP Engelbrecht, DP Zank, and DP Kudu Don Patterson - five WELS poentates - teamed up to rescue Ski from his follies. |
Labels:
Don Patterson,
Doug Engelbrecht,
SKi,
Tim Glende,
WELS,
Zank
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)